show that local supplies has been used up should add to that the draft of the last 2 years. and the result is starvation, hunger, and malnutrition. mostly because amongst the 10 paras countries in africa, situated on the south eastern coast of africa, it's often ignored by the world. but the crisis here is very real and growing by the day policy r, r t, the pu to mozambique. or i time for another visit to the cross talk studios next, county peter. and guess right ahead as need talk on the question. are there any adults left stay close, this is warranty. ah

ah ah

hello and welcome to cross. all things you considered you are the un nato living in alternative realities, sanctions on russia or mr. rating. western consumers in brussels refuses to acknowledge your can replace russian energy in any time. soon, on top of this, nato doubles down on the strategy. it is only yield a disaster. are there any adults in the room? ah, to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by them. i guess. george said, well, we in budapest, he's a guy which can be found on youtube and locals. and here in moscow we have to be bothered, she's a political analyst and you know, it's me, internet media for a gentleman crossed up rules and that means been just me want and i was just kicking off with george and budapest. it's been a somewhat, been a very exciting week. i would say, george, i mean, i believe program

e circus because that's what it was. so they, a new strategy came out of nato, which you and i discussed the venue would quite leg didn't make a whole lot of sense to me. but one thing that's very clear is that g 7, e, u, nato. they are essentially one. now, there is been a complete fusion, and nato appears to be taking the lead, which of course is the back for, for the us to run all 3. and this is what i got from their new strategic concept, which has no original thinking, falls back on this gobbledygook. values are nonsense here, so it is a circus. it's, they're talking to themselves. they're not communicating. essentially what they claimed on the longest projects ability to map back this doubling down and what is already failed your thoughts? oh, absolutely right. no summary. i mean they call it a new strategic concept. i mean there's nothing, nothing strategic,

nothing conceptual about it. so since 1991 loan, that nato has no purpose for existing. and so it's been constantly inventing new reasons to exist as own you know, we've had the humana area and intervention, preventing massive processes. then we have the war on terror. and then we've had all sorts of other things like women and so on. so this, in the sense now they've invented a new concept which is indefinitely expansion. because if you keep expanding in definitely, sooner or later you are going to get into an awful lot of trouble with an awful lot of states would look like you expanding into the neighborhood. and then of course, that it cell becomes a reason for nato to go on the existing. so when they talk now is a civic. so even though the civic is a,

is it that they can they use in the nato domain? we don't exactly know. one thing in the pacific really means it's kind of a concept that they invented like western bulk. you know that there's another thing that they're very preoccupied with. really defining what easton ball consists because like western book and sounds a lot better. but what is it, what will the now do? i mean, it, it sounds like they want to persuade india to join nato against china, which was another, is known as a civic, is last to really the problem that here they do creates the enemy. and what does it know? it's moving into the enemy's neighborhood, provoking and inevitable reaction, and then they don't. we look at how important we are for global stability. so give me your thoughts here because again, we the mentors, the nato is a defensive alliance. but why alliances defensive,

why does it need to expand it as it expands and creates animosity in the areas that is expanding to witness your brain? dema your thoughts? oh, well, let me 1st, let's just remember, how do i need leadership about this expansion about finland, sweden because then you members, you know that they're planning to become members, but the decision, they carry a section. and i remember how young who didn't wanted let so need to get more of nato. and would you destroy the disagreements inside just don't you. which disagreements, i mean, nato was nameless, in florida, in the nato was name in on been and destroying the beer in

2000 do. even last number, it's a military waste. believe me, i don't know why, you know, the result and, and the destruction of the country, you know, basically the civil war there. so tell me, where is this huge disagree? mr. mr. orange just objected some of the new venues or the european union and he was demonized. if you read the western press honda, real more bye. there is vicious, you know, almost alien us, you know, reach out and everything that is good and you're seeing because these people are just 2 or 3, you know, 2 or 3 points it used to, well, so it is absolutely right. the naval region, amos and expands that it also says, oh,

the enemy is so good about all disagreements that we should crush you. so you know that the latest, the latest idea is that there should be no consensus, you know, military action, which i think is a very dangerous thing. was them they to be, will get they can anyone who is not for the why the states and all the pay. so basically, you know, it's the same or stories, the same evolution of the journey made between 1940 is getting more and more area is more and more aggressive and destroying disagreements inside it because they don't have any so. so it's interesting the point that out, and i think there is a difference here. george is that until we, we remember, you know, that, you know, we're not alliance. it's not directed against anyone. you all this nonsense. well, now it is ok. they've taken the basketball, russia, china,

and this is what, this is what they want to galvanized the entire alliance around, which is, it's pretty bad. i mean, one of the things with these big compounds. i've noticed that this isn't a week conversation. they don't really see further down, you know, it's, it's, it's these people that they feel that they're the mandarins of the universe and that they're so very important. but i can tell you, looking in the asian press, ok, you know, if the, the g 7 needs, so what the brussels makes it up. so what i made, having oversight sense of themselves on the world stage. and, and what did, what many people say is that, you know, they are isolating themselves by directing all of their i'll focus on russia and we heard last week now, johnny george. that's exactly right. and that's very interesting, that during the,

in the announcing the strategic process, they several times a repeated every country has the right to determine its own future. that's what they said. you know, some countries allow yeah, but the interesting thing is that everything that nato does is to coerce. so the countries, i mean, i spent all that time going around the world telling india, oh, you have to join us in demonizing and sanctioning russia even though it has nothing whatever to do with the goes against your, your foreign policy goes against your national interest. it goes against your, his introduction, but you have to join up and they were doing that even to china. know them during the g 7, the last statement. they say, i have to join us. you have to start enabling russia. so here is a, yeah, i don't have to determine their own future except those don't determine the future along. ok. so once again, it's like you're, you have

a right to join us. you don't have a right not to join us. so, you know, we obviously have the case with in bytes, russian foreign minister to come and visit, and then they do moves in isn't already gone by over our space. so with, so the, as a future. so that's again, you know, the, the nature of which is we know we're creating these enemies. and that's interesting is not, there's nothing in the strategic said about cooperation leg. that's exactly legal to jim on this. you know exactly where i want to go. you know, you look at this strategic concept that big, i think was last, it was in 2000. and um, we have events we're playing out on the european content right now, of course that make reference to ukraine. not one word of how to resolve. and in that conflict, not one word. okay. so what is the,

what is this the dispenser military alliance all about. ok if they're not going to talk about peace in their own neighborhood. and of course, the argument has been made and i'll be, it's the argument that the russians have made. is it, at the very core of this conflict is nato expansion. no addressing that issue whatsoever. i hadn't a ration but also when legal said i don't, i don't know just how and so now i can again, i mean, we may be some security. i just, wow, you know, i think you discussed it with joe, you know, this is a nato seems to the, you know, come on, you know, a, well, if you're a woman and then you have to have your own military get,

you are listed in the army army can draft you for its own purposes, a nurse. so this is women, peace and security. this is the symbol. oh no. they just spreading. i think is george and i, we were, we did a long video on this on the gap, which i urge everyone to look at. and we were trying to figure out why those 3 words worked together. maybe like less than that. but i mean the, in general, correct me if i'm wrong, but there's something wrong with more than one. so like, for women in the united states, you know, affordable kid a, my, a people at the battle you, this is all very,

all right. but they want us forget about iraq. there is you, people talk about, we was right, you know, you companies, but we do have a for the expenses here. and this is the main point. maybe this is just one more a you mentioned that real quickly here. i mean, this is one of the things in this document is the word values. give me 30 seconds. we go to the break, but i think it's the actual document is 11 pages long and the word values comes up of 17 times. so everything is really about it's bad news because it never really specifies what these values are. you know, so it's assume that there, you know, you know, god, mother, an apple pie and all, and all those things, i mean, are, you know, all sorts of other things as being pointed out, it's about all values are dropping women and sending them out. and it's like,

it's like, well, it's very fluid, it values what we think at the time, laurie ben, gentleman, company, we're going to go to restore. discussion will stay ah, ah, ah

ah, a russian station to never see a anyone else homes go about with we will van in the european union, the kremlin. yup. machines. the state aunt rush up to date and school r t spoke neck, given our video agency, roughly all band on youtube in san lucas comment. question, did you think even close to chat with

welcome. as all things are considered id labelle, this is the home edition. remind you were discussing some real ah was go back to here in moscow demand, i guess what is it $803000000.00 more dollars than i losing out how much money is being sent there as well over 50 percent of what russian spent on defense a year, but it was a very, it's some interesting stories coming out. and something that we've projected here is some of the high tech stuff that the u. s. and sending very expensive, a missile defense related to missile defense and whatnot. and there are some reports that it's landing, other hands,

it's being sold on the black market. i knew this was going to happen if it isn't true back to we need more cooperation. but the stories are beginning to circulate. so not only is the conflict in the ukraine, not winding down, and that's, that's craven choice on the side of the west. and zalinski backers. but now we have very sophisticated, very expensive, a military hardware floating around in the 3rd parties. what could possibly go wrong? the month ahead. well, the most tragic part of it is that the s russian troops wish the ukrainian troops away, you know, them with a distance from that russian speak in the areas, you know, they're, they're mega audiences in the eastern countries such as, don't. yeah. and, and you saw so unfortunately, a americans are supplying more distance. well, which make it possible for the you bring and i, me to strike, not all the,

at these ages. also just on the on saturday, the stock app builder or russian by people in the center in the downtown. so in fact, these make this work more dangerous. you know, i have a friend, you bring your lives here, you know, he became a rational citizen. he always he so he's family, they all want it for the russian citizenship where there are no. ask him. ok. so unless you want to become part of russian, does your family want? he said yes. but why don't you? 7 were a middle. why has to be mostly politic like dan, there was no, this is not going to work for us. we want the full protection. i mean, you know,

a situation. ok. we want to be part of what it means security. you regime is terrible. where ready to go with that for some time if there is whole but that, but we don't want to leave like the people in donald during these 8 years when they were not just they were all by the way in this situation between the 2. 5 is the worst. so this explains the rush of actions. and the problem with these american weapons is that they make these gray zone been russia and ukraine. the zone, of course, the threat was high, must strike at the distance of 300 kilowatts, which is about 200 miles more than 200 miles. this is a huge distance and you are right. some of these mountains do disappear. i change my american police, you know, the american journalist, look at your own newspaper. look at that range in mind is to $14000.00 how maybe

you bring in weapons off in, locally or in iraq. you know, i mean, so see the bill, lord of war and that's what it's all about. it's a great film. george, this is something you talked about and you're probably one of the 1st actually the talk about it. is it did we did? what did the kind of tell us what dinner was saying? this good can't be any, have measures at this point. it has to be a total inclusive deal and it will be dictated. 5 the russian side at this point. ok. because the most after it, you know, this kind of 5050 gray area think no, it's not acceptable too much. it's not been too much. has been spent too many people have died too much, but this cannot happen again that and that's what the solution of this conflict is going to be a total solution. thoughts a total solution because whatever losses originally tension may have been on

february the 24, which was essentially just to liberate a little gas. and then you know, just leave it, leave it there. i don't think that's the solution now because the americans specially but also the british and the rest of the day. so they want to keep boring in ever more sophisticated and dangerous weapons. you brent, they have to encourage zelinski and his gang gong fighting this war. so there's no point, i just have to say that we've done, we've achieved our objectives because i won't have it because as long as they keep loving these mist and you know what the deal is maybe on saturday, they are the head targets inside russia. when they specifically promised the americans and the americans told the public, no, no, the we haven't a,

they were going to do this. and we know that they go to target crimea. i mean, i'm already said that they go to target crimea a going to keep doing this, and the americans are going to another, they going to keep doing this. and they think that this is the way to bring russia down by essentially keeping this will going and humiliating and eventually giving her a rush of them has so essentially take over the rest of the country and remove the people from power, you know, whoever they bring somebody else in with bringing back, you know, which they can allow these people to say, oh it's, it's interesting to say that because there was a western and i went to western pole a 1000000000 conduct the inside of your grade last few days. and i sent you

a 50 percent of the paintings and their, their own government as well as russia. b bear but claimed their own government for the state that they did there, the fall in them. it's very interesting. i can remember places like responsible state grounds and all that say your grade is one of the war, although your grades are completely, you know, and you know, i think that will have to be scrub some point because it's so embarrassing because of the problem so much with western coverage of ukraine, even before the conflict, that it's a very complicated and one united country. and we're seeing this here. i have called what's going on in ukraine. also a civil war. and i think a lot of people, you've already alluded to it how people in different cities of your grade, only gradient. but when something like this happens, they want to total solution. they don't want to have this kind of growing floor that ukraine has been sense. it's independence. go ahead. no, i mean,

just for mary goes on the stand, what's going all, imagine that some kind of very american gama k bought in canada and they receive all the u. s. news in canada. yeah, i'm french and watch them. you know, of course, there will be a lot of people who, if war from so if there is a chance to become a citizen. well, look for that. because there is more freedom, you know, the same story with christina and books right now in odessa. it is refusing to give children russian education, which is why he became english in your case, educational english in your range and you want it. and this has been going on for 8 years. and the late of these has been the one all 430 years. yeah, you're absolutely right. and you spoke to ations all there?

well, i mean, the western probably has been saying, oh, what is plans with all of the american day right here was that there will be a good read all i mean the last, but there will be agree want instructional that nothing. all the saw you bringing armies resisting, right. that's true. bar therapist with russian army. so you could, there is no group, sometimes the keel, a russian official, you know that the ukrainian groups, special forces groups the ball cause you know, the usual terrorist activity. there is no very war. why? because people on a and maybe to the, to the new or just are ready to start the war to the people on the ground. that's one thing. but george

president by said, you know, when asked about high energy prices against me. and you know, and of course, you know what the western publics are going to have to suffer. and he says it is long as it takes. well, i think that you know, that time frame all of the, all of the nato combat, i think it was a, was ray mcgovern at 330 blind mice, which i think even it was a really good way to put it here. but i don't think they have, they actually speak for people on the ground that have to pay such high energy prices. and i think they're all, they're really the day for their bombastic emotional on xpo say, when they go in completely disregarding the interest of their own people go ahead. yeah, completely. and some of the other day they had this why house official was interviewed on cnn. and it was off this very question,

what price we've been to pay and we have to pay, you know, whatever price it takes for the liberal liberal. well, no, no. so we got, we, i mean, it doesn't matter. you don't have any food on the table. you don't have any gas going to your tanks to get to work. the liberal won't order. and that's really, you know, he said he's blotted out the true, which is that this isn't the least war. it's all about, they go, they use you great, very cynically. you know, essentially destroy russia eventually destroy china, has to dominate the, well, they don't go about it. the one they are, they're always the lead this, this is a leading to disaster. you know, the germans a screening. you know, a, you know, a moment ago you were,

you was saying that you were going to basically got them all. i wanted to hear it all. and at this time, i want to say to both you and who are you are the people that want to defend the liberal world order. they don't know what the bread they don't know what a leader of gasoline. they don't know how much electricity they don't care because it doesn't affect them. that is the water ok in the protection at the expense of everyone else. that's the end of my speech. amanda barbara. a he was watching us here. ah. ah.

a with heavy shelling by ukrainian force is continues on done yet. city tides guards a warning, disturbing images follow. busy that person is killed in the also i had a friend lisa calling for months and months everywhere with the city there are dugouts that credit slide please. they take a lot of work on rti cru. explore is what had been the law ukrainian stronghold in the lou counts republic on the same day. russian and allied forces secured for.