which is to look for common ground a with hatred by chinese media reveals china preparing for military exercises in the taiwan straits. that as you, as healthy commences, begin for officials with paid despite numerous warnings from beijing. china strongly condemned to visit, saying it was a leaky, defend its territorial integrity and accuses b u. s. of provocation. this again proves that some us politicians have become the trouble makers of china. us relations in the us has become the number one savage or of the peace and stability of the taiwan strait.

and some people in taiwan all concerned over the us health because members of the public told us below says that the place to be you if domestic audience and will not benefit to tie one at all for the low see touch china's bottom line. she touched the red line, so both of us and china have to take actions accordingly. they just use a tension for domestic market. lo, she's to visit with attention to cross the taiwan strait, which has no benefit at all for the taiwan people with him here in moscow, 1 pm in taipei and you with auntie international. hello, and welcome to today's program. i'm point clear, thanks so much for joining us. china has begun military drills in areas surrounding tie one. the move comes in response to the visit of you as how speaker nancy pelosi

is visit to taipei, which kicked off her to a earlier with a meeting with high ranking type. these officials, including the deputy later such a speaker and president, ty, one's defense, ministry has already accused mainland china of allegedly encroaching on the islands territory and threatened to respond. china hasn't commented on these allegations. here's some of the latest footage shade by chinese media. 21 chinese warplanes passed through ty, once a defense identification zone, and according to beijing, military sources tools will include non nuclear missile launches from the sea, east of the island territory. and also include live fire exercises and coordination between warships and fighter aircraft. ty, ones, islands are say to have been put on for combat alert. as chinese media are flooded by footage of a major military preparations, china had already warned washington of serious consequences of the us because visit

china will definitely take all necessary measures to resolutely safeguarded sovereignty. and territorial integrity in response to the us speakers visit. all the consequences arising there from must be borne by the us side and the tie want independence, separatist forces. ah, he has a quick look at what constitutes china and tie one's military sources. ty, paste, total active forces are just a fraction of what stands behind beijing. the number of chinese aircraft, navy, ships and tanks, also well to pass as ty,

one's military forces. while top us officials have repeatedly stated that washington does not support taiwanese independence. nancy pelosi being a key official herself met the president of taiwan and received an award from anita on behalf of the u. s. congress for her contribution to us the taiwan relations. earlier, pelosi pledged corporation and full support for tyler taiwanese authorities during the meeting in parliament building team. so we want to increase enter parliamentary cooperation and dialogue. and we do so at a time when our president has put forth an asian pacific initiative, which we support. and we want to be specific in terms of how we work with taiwan in that regard. clearly it's a publication of china. and if you are talking about cooperation in the atmosphere, that's here at the moment of confrontation, military confrontation,

you're talking about building up the american presence or support of taiwan, which is basically at aircraft carrier for the united states and foreign policy coming. so visit, i'm sure, despite the controversy over who in the white house supported it with miracle ministration, who didn't, must have the okay from president biden and from others. so it's a publication of china and it's part of the whole process that has been laid out in the madrid summit declaration of later to contain china could have to continue the publications of china. and of course, russia as well. the 2 countries being joined together because both represent opposition and a poll of attraction in the world to the united states. this is the moment nancy

pelosi arrived at function, a port in tie pay the flight tracking fight flight rate on $24.00. the come through the number of people following her j, which almost 3000000 people at the court figure for the service the us health because said her visitors, evidence of the u. s. commitment to support taiwanese democracy and he has become the highest ranking american official to visit the self hold island in 25 years. the white house, meanwhile, has stated that a dialogue between washington and beijing will be kept open and that the u. s. does not want to crisis with china. the united states will not and does not will not seek and does not want a crisis. we are prepared to manage wellbeing chooses to do. at the same time, we will not engage in sabre rattling. we will continue to operate in the seas and the skies of the western pacific. as we have done for decades, we will continue to support taiwan. defend a free and open indo pacific and seek to maintain communication with beijing. mom

and he seems to see nothing special in a visit when it comes to china's reaction. while china has stood in the way of taiwan participating and going to certain meetings that they understand that they will not stand in the way of people coming to taiwan. and to show a friendship of support, but also a source of learning about how we can work together better in collaboration. so it, yeah, no, i don't. i think that that they made a big fuss because on speaker, i guess, i don't know if that was a reason or an excuse because they didn't say anything when the men however, if the u. s. inconsistency of china's territorial integrity that has become a cause of contention for beijing. since it's switched recognition from taipei to beijing, washington has held an ambivalent position on china anti one. it officially acknowledges

beijing as the only legitimate government for the whole of china, including ty, one in line with the one china policy. but this has not proven to the u. s. for maintaining unofficial relations with taipei and sending military aid to the island . china now accuses the u. s. of stowing trouble in the region. the open political provocation has aroused the fury of the chinese people and as opposed by the whole international community. this again proves that some us politicians have become the troublemakers of china. us relations in the us has become the number one savage or of the peace and stability of the taiwan strait. one, china policy has been a definitive aspect to us china relations for the past 40 year. but today's visit by nancy pelosi seems to put all of that on the brink of destruction. the one china policy is that the united states acknowledges the people's republic of china as the

one chinese government on the mainland. it does not have diplomatic relations with the government on time. one then an advocate, taiwan being peaceably re integrated with the mainland into one giant. now it appears that despite the fact that nancy pelosi has gone to taiwan, the white house and john kirby and others that us state department are maintaining that the one china policy does in fact, remain intact with us. they are not backing away from that. however, we're seeing signals to the contrary, a lot of action by the united states and the lead up to today's big that i have indicated that the us, the one china policy may be on the brink of being revoked. this is what we heard from a representative of the american institute in taiwan observing recent trends, the united states no longer sees taiwan is a problem in our relations with china. we see it as an opportunity to advance our shared vision for a free and open in the pacific and also as a beacon to people's around the world who aspire for a more just safe,

prosperous and democratic world. now, us officials in 5th, they are not wavering on the issue of taiwan. however, it doesn't help when you have the president of united states making remarks like this. are you willing to get involved militarily to defend taiwan if it comes to that? yes, you are. that's a commitment we made. now we see last official giving mixed signals almost as if they're not talking to each other before they make their statement or engage in their actions contradictory messages being sent by washington. the world is quite nervous about this, as they fear it could push things onto the brink of another global crisis. tipsy independent arms control and conflict consultant visibility visit is an ill timed staved provocation. the idea of having a one china policy and then leaving it good and well alone. maintaining the strategic ambiguity has been the backbone of us policy for decades,

and it's largely worked and taiwan is prospered under that policy. so the idea that nancy pelosi somehow needs to go in and rectify a situation that's been working just fine, is bizarre. this was an unnecessary and thoughtless provocation based on the actions of someone who won't be the speaker of the house much longer at age. 82, even if the democrats managed to hold on to the house of representatives november's elections. if this is about or putting your footprints in the sands of history, it's remarkably, the old time. i think it's extraordinary that we're seeing a distancing of the us administration of the executive function in the u. s. to, with the legislative function is represented by speaker pelosi, i think it's, it's the same democratic party in the us controlling both bodies at the moment. other that may not last for much longer, but the fact that they're saying she's on her own is actually, and she can do as she likes, is a total abrogation of the executive functions responsibility to make and execute

foreign policy. they're handing over the foreign policy on china and taiwan to the speaker of the house of representatives. i expect biting to drop this like a rock. as soon as she's back in the, in the us, he's going to try and forget about this as soon as people let him weather people do, let him forget about it as another question. earlier my colleague, always the shade, discuss policies as a to tie one with our correspondent rachel blevins. hello. she's finally touched down there. you know, even an, even in the face of all this rhetoric from china. hello, she apparently had to make her visit. what are your expectations now that she's here? you know, she released that statement right after she touched down in which she claimed that she was there to support what she referred to as taiwan, the vibrant democracy. she also went as far as to say that she does not believe that she is in violation of the one china policy, which is absolutely not how beijing sees it is not what they have worn again and again, when it came to the lead up to this proposed visit now it was also notable that she

talked about democracy there because it makes you wonder how do the people of taiwan see this visit. and what we've heard is from people on the ground there who say they are concerned about the long term impacts of policies, visit that will play out and impacted them. long after she has returned to the united states. take listen to what was said, but it's all about mercury interest. they use taiwan, they, they use that your political mom measure to, to benefit themselves. they only care about how the government can be holding the power in this, in their, in them states. so they just used high one to get our attention for domestic market from good hello, see, touch china's bottom line. she touched the red line. so both the u. s. and china have to take actions accordingly. only pelosi will benefit from the elusive visit.

that's all pelosi visit will attention across the taiwan straits, which has no benefit at all for the taiwan people. i really hope that the americans will not come around to mess things up so that we can live a peaceful life in all of this. it's also been notable to see how the white house has responded to this. right. you've got president biden, who himself has admitted that the u. s. military did not think this trip was a good idea that they concerned about the ways in which you would increase tensions between the us and china, exactly as we have seen. and then at the same time, you also had secretary of state lincoln who spoke out and said that the decision was entirely up to nancy pelosi herself. and you think about all of the possible ramifications that could come out of this between the world's 2 largest economies. and yet you have the white house sitting there saying it is the speaker of the house who is allowed to make this decision and to do something that would lead to the current tensions that we're seeing. and yet when we've looked back at the statements that nancy pelosi has mean,

she's kind of shrugged it off and downplayed the situation to say, believe table is know what she said earlier. the president earlier well, earlier in his term talked about a strong emphasis on the asian pacific. he, he has visited, their vice president, visited the secretary of commerce and others. and we want that congress of the united states to be part of that initiative. of course, as a west coast person, we see that pacific as they're, you know, that they're their home. we're part of that as well. so you can see there, she's almost shrugging it off as if it's no big deal. she's just going to say more of the pacific ocean, and yet we look at all of the ramping of the engines that we're seeing between the u. s. and china right now. that makes you wonder if she truly realizes the impact of this visit. that let's take the politicians rhetoric out of the equation for now . rachel, what's the general view in america regarding this whole thing?

yeah, there seem to be more questions than answers as to why pelosi is embarking on a trip like this. right. with everything that's going on in the u. s. right now with the american people who have repeatedly said that they're concerned about skyrocketing gas prices, about inflation. but all of the issues they have going on at home. they're wondering why the speaker of the house is making a trip like this and why she's costing the american taxpayers millions of dollars of security in order to make this possible. and that really is reflected in some of the voices that we're hearing speaking out now. questioning why now, why this trip and why is this something that blows embarked on? here's the latest on that. nothing good will come of it. taiwan will not be more secure or more prosperous as a result of this purely symbolic visit. and a lot of bad things could happen. these include a chinese military response that could result in the u. s. being plunged into in direct conflicts with a nuclear armed russia and a nuclear armed china at the same time. so nancy pelosi goes to ty,

pay. what's the effect of that? well, we don't need to guess. the chinese government has said repeatedly and clearly that if nancy pelosi lands in taiwan, it could trigger a global war. are you here to provoke a war or to start a war? what the hell are you doing here? hello. see? so we've heard a reaction out of aging. we've heard a bit of muffled reaction out of washington d. c. what about the rest of the world? it's rather quiet at the moment. we have any other international reaction to that. yeah, you know, it was interesting because earlier this week when posey was in singapore, the premier, there actually said that the focus needed to be on maintaining stable relations between the united states and china. that that was something that was in all of their best interest in the region. at the same time, we've also heard from mosque our spokesperson for the kremlin, spoke out and referred to this trip as extremely provocative, noting that russia stands with china. and also that moscow understand that frustration that is coming from beijing when it comes to this visit in the fact

that the united states has continued to carry out. so certainly a lot of moving parts here, a lot to keep an eye on. and these consequences will likely be felt long after this is over, you think is any chance that nancy pelosi could actually get stuck there? because in the coming days, i saw a picture of a map that would china basically publish and said, we're going to be doing these live fire drills on the west side of taiwan on the east side of taiwan to the north and south in the coming days. is it possible that pelosi could actually get stuck, that? you know, that's an excellent question. at the same time. we've seen the u. s. military really focus on trying to build up some sort of buffer zone, but you're right. that is trying to is region that is right in their backyard. and so if they wanted to make it difficult, they arguably could. now the question is going to become what they decide to do. and of course, how the united states decides to react if the by an administration is really going to step in and ramp up tensions even more than what they already are at right now. and the turmoil china has imposed sanctions against to ty when he's fun,

which beijing accuses of supporting separatism and a smear campaign against beijing. meanwhile, the ramifications of policies that have already been felt in local financial markets. shades fell in semiconductor manufacturers and tie one home to some of the largest such companies in the world. overall time when he stocks dropped about 2 percent, which is the biggest for in 3 weeks, the controversial visit of the us house speaker brought down the value of a number of industry giants. in addition to stock for was not any fault anti one, but also with other global semiconductor manufacturers. tom longo, geopolitical market analyst and publisher, the gold boats and guns newsletter says washington is deliberately provoking beijing as part of an economic pressure campaign. visit by philosophy is interesting because it just feels like so much theater to me and but at the same time it is very serious. right. the chinese are vickie, very seriously in the us knows exactly what it's doing in terms of provocation.

this entire affair with policy is actually the giant boss to get the chinese to over commit, or to overreact to the situations. and now we can start putting up the sanctions wall around china and the same way. and that, that we put up or around russia, right? which is clearly, these are lead ups to a wider conflict in many ways i want as a single point of failure. hello things, trip to tie what appears not have received much support in the west, the media. and as a recent article by the new york times, the j, the visit may plunge the us into in direct conflict, not only with russia, but now also with china. us officials are a lot more concerned about ukraine's leadership than they are letting on this ukraine. war is so not over, so not stable, so not without dangerous surprises that can pop out on any given day. given the middle of all this, we are going to risk conflict with china over taiwan,

provokes by an arbitrary and frivolous visit by the speaker of the house. all of this would be terribly funny if it wasn't so serious. this ends up being a diversion from the united states offered to support the war in ukraine. what is betrayed by friedman's article is the utter chaos. that is, the biden administration's foreign policy because they keep sending mixed signals. they say they were back the one china policy, they don't recognize independence for taiwan. yet below, she's a rival and all of the other messages and that's going alliance to just that. so this conflict in washington were washington doesn't really know what it's doing anymore. it can't decide if it's supporting ukraine fully. or if it was in the back or their mind, what to support independence for taiwan. but they don't want to get into a conflict with china. is it? it is a confused hot mess. earlier my colleague union o'neill discussed the situation

with alfred desire that professor of international law and angela july. mia, a political and financial analyst. we americans love annoying, although we are focusing our fingers in through their eyes from that shows that we are number one and we don't even realize that we are 6. we do this because it makes us feel good. it's part of the informational war, and it's part of penal for the it's feeding into the fear of the chinese as we have been led to fear russia to fear of russia that are so by definition we're the good guys and we're fighting the good. what i don't believe is how and these are buying it, and the rest of the world is not buying a latin america is not buying it. neither is india and of course, not rush hour,

russia and many other countries in europe with china, apparently not carrying military maneuvers in the area. is this historically recently, at least the closest we've come to a major incident between the 2 powers? yes, absolutely. so keep in mind, this is a sure force, china needs to do something. china doesn't want to lose face. it was, it goes to taiwan. something needs to happen if, if the u. s. is thinking that china bluff, it's making a huge mistake. the international community will not point directly finger at the us and say that ultimately, if there's a refund response, the responsibility would come from china. so it's just, it's been all quality coordinated these. it's not, it's not a private enterprise he of nancy pelosi. what they want to do is to fight china to

the last time when he's there we have other countries fighting the was on behalf of the u. s. one could also ask, just as alfred alluded to their how helpful this is for the taiwanese themselves. is there an argument to be made that they could be left in a much more tense environment done before despite but pelosi is trying to achieve or see she wants to keep in mind that how one is actually the fact talk economically integrated with china. so you have a de facto integration. it is going against how one's interest. well, that brings us to the end of the bulletin for this our p. stay tuned and will bring you more news and updates as and when it happened. thanks so much for joining us. ah,

i for the so called collective west is at war with russia using ukraine as a proxy. the west has made it clear at once a russia that is weaker and isolated on the world stage. today these attempts have ended in failure. in fact, be, office, it is happened, the west is weaker and isolated. ah, with

ah, no one, no, sir, no, no. hon. who are job? no, no. well dog, more shrill than what they should end up unit 73. 1 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short, then build the most powerful and most deadly biological weapons program that the world had ever. no real good, you know, to production issue or sure,

doug did that. they're not eligible. no new son, new rochelle, he on more, more general manager thought this meant union from all one of up on there and i've got to learn much sale. i got your name. i don't understand. i wish to know about doing whole new a new you didn't or got more pushed in jail. it's i had to put on with their mother and all your body build. you do a couch. nice. oh boy. good to go. i was sure on what the on this the wall. she my and new other. i'm all, i can send more on all said mom, good student. i don't the, you know, a lot of all put them out that they give us a lot look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the

orders given it by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about personal intelligence at that point. obviously is too late. trust i rather than fear a on various job with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot must protect his phone existence with oh, barstow pretty well actually this it or she actually with miley on the city on their

punk to dish zillow. karlesha. laura, that the she's us. yeah. i do have school or g f, q 3 up i c h u. she's leeway federal charlotte. so chris you who did verify with e j was still pretty much u. s. e and up on the audio, initially on the phone, see if you wanna talk with us what they do as little should've done, boss, nash them buffer solution, new car that was reasoning you them come on to bring me a check out. okay. studios. yes. yes, marshall. tom mccoy semi ramirez, richly, ukrainian, helped me as diverse there's a huge void between nationalist volunteer battalions and the ukranian military force. the u. a f. also at the for finger thing, but easy to use,

the tongue sold out to get the sodium hopefully more using you doesn't pick up where you're with pretty quick. it's about almost a full grains. come with a comma lunches for you more because you to really subtle from shelf cousin, keep way right. and soccer and the police have all of those either one of you. i mean we've been looking at legal dice. no problem. what did you, i'm yourself or i don't not or chia i'll get cups if a works on a prisoner exchange program. she has met several ukrainian mothers searching for missing subs. ah, if i'm allowed lady about the money was in last and you got lots and lots of dad in a god. i knew somebody when you my live stock was ashlock. nice. please evaluate. why did you approach the no, she yet and these young untrained men are allegedly being sent to the front line with national battalions marching behind it. and you said it was a molar before.