on one side. 2 and the, it was a big thing when you have absolute evil on one side, absolute good on the other. and of course one side is the victim of on just a vote. what was that to say? always that always on the back end. so when amnesty comes along, as you say, be the stuff that we've known from the start, which is that the gradient forces have been using as military bases, schools and hospitals. then that of course, calls the whole equation to question. so that's why the most furious onslaught has come from liberal media outlets such as the guardian, which you naturally, you know, give, highlight all the stories from ukrainian government official, including the american british government of actual nonsense. this is

a very poorly researched report. the am, is the people on the ground? no, absolutely nothing. but they say, well, we've known all along, they're using schools and hospitals for reason in order to draw retaliatory fire. and why do they want to draw retaliatory fire so that they can then point to rushes, asking, making all kinds of media. and the western, the plate along the left, repeating ad nauseam that the russians are committing walk right. when we know that they deliberately, i mean this is when they deliver to them plenty of other places where they could have had a military basis. and then they went to school when that school was destroyed, they moved to another school to get when one hospital to just read the novel. so that's, that's, that they did, this is, these are places where they want to locate or so naturally when this equation russians are absolutely well, great news or absolute good is shatter,

then all hell breaks loose it with every passing day, the reality is infringing upon the propaganda, this is the most propagandistic war we have ever seen in our life. i thought iraq was about, but this is much worse. and so i just have been, you know, that when the curtains pull back you see a very different reality. and that's why these people, they are, their hair gets on fire because you're not supposed to say that you're not supposed to even think these kinds of things. but it's, like i said, what georgia says here is that this has been very well documented. if you really want to know and be natural, didn't just come across something unusual, i came across something very common place. unfortunately, i had well, this is the most frustrating thing about this, all the russian media and excuse me, the local media in us then have been reporting about these thousands of thousands

of times during the fight in, in march, during the fight. and in several years, they all was the ukrainian forces keep using came to god and schools while they are military bases. and there was blank for each and there was 0 dash and back to that in the west. so the me of the more tried to is that if you want to attract attention to your death, to the risks of your life, you will have to go to these people groups. because i can see that these people, you know, why i saw they are press one, for instance in moscow you, the 9th is the thousands and thousands times. to be frank with you, you know, the language used by amnesty international about the war in change. not about the or it was right. it was very keep it or i mean i don't like these people. i hate the other agent language that they use, but they are the only ones who can attract attention. the was just doesn't and be

a, are there going to is ations the west? don't believe it's opponents. so the only way you can attract attention is by wanting to these people. and this is not the 1st time you know, human rights watch in 2014 report that the use of class can munitions by the brain forces. i'm closure. 2014 ukrainian government was used class to munitions. this is from human rights watch. this is again, the was a war and may amount to crimes. this was documented at least 14 times in the nav. this was documented by the international committee there at ross who was killed in october with the use of cost of munitions. so i remember when this report came out, how the western media try to push it up. you know, of course, you know, people who don't, yes, were very enthusiastic about it because jesus,

for the 1st time, the western media stand out and, and the media. there was a lot of criticism. and as you know, human rights watch, just like amnesty international, had to balance it with a lot of reports on, you know, crimes committed by the other side. so, i mean, for me, the most frustrating thing is that this is something, this is something obvious. something that you don't have to be a specialist to see if you see them anywhere in your grade and all the international. finally reports are there is some of that bait and mr. williams, he gets angry. and the head of that i missed the international ukrainian euro. ok song because you suddenly leaves saying that there use cracked up to be different from the amnesty international values. now, you know, you need about themselves,

and the mediately she has to resign because jesus, they don't know just the software. no rush and speakers. all thing was, you know, you know that george, i mean, i guess it's kind of an interesting juxtaposition, you know, being on the cover of vogue magazine and amnesty international. i guess you kind of get your pick as it were here. but that's just the point. you know, isn't it? i mean, it's not, you know, the, the suffering of the people. all people suffer on the ground. very wars. ok, let's be honest about that. ok. but i mean, this western media propaganda it's, you know, i mean, how many times if, you know, we've seen situations like this and they make it on the cover of both magazine. i mean, they're really scraping the bottom of the barrel, aren't and of course, i didn't do the lensky any good at all because that was even too much for the biggest fan. but they're going to go back to the sea into these international humanitarian organizations. they are part of the western propaganda machine because

they are there to demonize the foe of the day. you know, whether it's that i was saying in the ninety's it was loss of h a p a right? these are both of these people are actually months is like a man. and if you look at how these organizations fund themselves, they a lot of very wealthy people, n foundation, george and i was, you know, give them huge amounts of money. i mean, these are lavishly funded organizations. the people who are on the boards of these organizations are all former politicians, former government officials, for intelligence agency. and that was the, you know, this is bother, you know, was a reputation. but occasionally they want to balance things. and so let's say 10

reports that human rights watch publish is about the horrors, the russians perpetrated. once they might say something about negative, about what the gradient just 10 versus one, but even that one publication. and that's all it all hell breaks loose. ready and then there's an immediate attack saying, you know what, this is, you know, you don't know what you're talking about. you're drawing equivalence between aggressive rules and fictions, and often happens. they need to have to start backing away now. so i'm listening to run by this guy and mark hasn't done so, and she does have a certain reputation because she was the person who wrote that report about the you assassination of really general. so the money and she said that was essentially a war crime. so she, she hasn't back to way as yet, but i think that would be further repercussions with, well, keep it on,

you know, you know, it was a lonely call in the words about why don't we investigate ukraine's all the guards . again, everyone you know, runs in shivering. you know, you can't do that, you know? because, you know, we still have more and more money being bored and we don't know where it's going. nobody really knows where it's going. we don't know who has all the codes and all of that, but it seems to be disappearing. i mean, but no investigation of people that have no criminal history. well again, the here you have the, if you believe this use of language, why don't we investigate your graham oligarchs? why don't you investigate american already got, you know, the one only got it is, you know, it's just, it became effective. if you don't like somebody who is rich, you can only go right. and this is the only way this machine can operate the way. i mean,

these people are very rich and they're very unlike book they can work together. i mean it's, i'm sorry, 2 minds meal starting soviet union. someone who yesterday was a respect the official like you guys are in tomorrow because the paper, school deviation, you know, and left just deviation for right is deviation. suddenly he becomes a criminal and anything can be able to get, you know, the same story here. and then when george said, you know, this is the one, it's not the one that's 100 to one and steel. these people cannot tolerate any criticism. again, it reminds me all of the times of the soviet union and not in favor of today's west, because look in 62 a soviet magazine, moly, me, are published. these are these roles. walk by are excited over newton the one day in the life of denise it. and immediately, you know, why did people believe people all the them believe in started repressions?

well, the saw me, it's a song, it magazine, the saw me stand on us about it. i got to read it real estate. ah, ah, news with

with the aggression today, i'm authorizing the additional strong sanctions today. russia is the country with the most sanctions imposed against it. a number that's constantly growing. i figure which of the problem with the mind the we're, we're, we're banding all imports of russian oil and gas new g. i. k. with regard to joe, by imposing the sanctions on russia has destroyed the american economy. so there's your boomerang. ah ah ah

ah ah, a doubles are going to put well, talking with a, with a lawyer. issue somebody over there, both those with

you up boils up with it is you know, that way. i don't mind ah, well, the most across all things considered. i'm here little this is the home addition to remind you. we're discussing some real news. ah ok. go back to change gears a little bit here. we've heard through official media,

corporate media that the trainings and they're getting a 1000000 man army together and there's going to be a big fan. so i think there may be in a pen. so this mom, i tend to be the ukranian one, but i have the theory about it. it's kind of going to tell us what we said in the 1st part of the program. this is actually a fundraising event. this is the, you know, their fund raising. you know, we're going to get it offensive to get there. you know, if we need support, we need money more, more money, more money. that's what it seems to me. that's kind of like a powerpoint presentation, you know? and because from what i can tell me if i'm wrong, they haven't really had one significant strategic goal. big 3 in all of this. go ahead. yes, i completely. i mean, i think that the ukrainians, a government essentially trying to get more and more money out

of the united states and, and they're doing it by going on about how they did amount this huge offensive. and, and, and it's something that works because, right away the media report this on the upcoming events, that if you really are planning and offensive, the one thing you don't do is, you don't publicize it, you know, you don't tell your opponents, you're about to attack them and then get them to move them horses and be ready for your absolutely no military sense whatsoever. yeah, the media report seriously is coming up and then hope campaign will be after. and yes, and sure enough, by just another $1000000000.00 worth of a new nation to event. and that's the way they need to maintain the

stance that they're somehow on the brink of winning this war. because otherwise, the americans and everyone else are going to stop asked the question, where is this going? how can we go on, essentially depleting our own cameras and sending them weapons? we don't know where what's happening to these weapons. they don't seem to be any good because you know, the, the moment we sent you 1000000000 dollars worth of weapons from somebody, we need another 1000000000 dollars. what, what is happening. so they have to keep doing this in order to keep those channels going indefinitely. they may be giving money, seems to be an excuse for everything. ok, good money will solve everything. but considering over the past few months, the amount of western arms in a monetary it hasn't had any impact whatsoever. so throw more money at it. i get, you know,

this is something that is really hard to comprehend. i personally think this is my personal opinion is that the campers in there are just trying to see if they get as much as they possibly can before they have their moment of reckoning. ok, and so we, i make reference to the afghan president with his helicopters leaving the country. you get my point as well. i think this is a disaster situation where we are now control for money, corrupt officials in your grade. and we, well, people in the united states who basically failed with all of their predictions or cost you in charge of saying, and weapons and money. you know, just last week the german press reminded us, or mark me, you know, the joint chiefs of staff, just 2 weeks before the russian special operation began, he predicted that there will be a war. it would last for 72 hours. the russians would take even 72 hours and then

there would be a long, protracted grima fight. you know, everything happened bank 100 percent different. you know, the ukranian army was not able to pay, but i get, it continues to fight. but there is no good re, we're all on the 3rd year, the project control sort of very simple reason. the ukranian army is fighting so well precisely because of the crew to the regime. if you don't go to the army, you get arrested. you go to prison, if you say something against the government. now, you know, look, a member of the shaking chemo ukraine was, was basically assassinated. you shot dead by the rain insecurity force on the suspicion on the suspicion on the trail. so basically these are very clearly the army fights on the 3rd to switch this regime controls when this really leaves, like on the 3rd, you're going boss or,

or you know that there are some people leave completely different life and try to forget, you know, about this was you that won't be afraid that they would come back? that's true faith, they will come back, but there is no good reasonable. it's not against that. you know, the problem with the united states is that it fights was, it starts was in so many parts of the world. but finally these people get confused . you know, they confuse against them from grain, yugoslavia, vietnam, and the other things. so about answering your question, they let me play and all these wars been the same air condition is in a suburb a that's a sad reality. yes. but basically what is really dangerous, it's not just the loss of money. it's that danger, always glacier. and in that sense, there was a pretty interesting article in the economist last week, which was headline, what would push the western russia to nuclear war. and basically, the jonas that he saw the change in a few years of the states. you know,

when all of the predictions failed and will be, became a war of 2 armies. suddenly the united states reviewed this position and starting from april, they started sending very dangerous weapons right. in since june, the position is not the rule not to let you create moves. we're not going to it. ok . you know, like we don't want to bring to wind. because obviously the goals, which is just to say that i don't really, you want all the time to back. and she speaks about a striking of russia. leslie says all will support that, but we don't want to grade to do those. that's a very broad definition. i mean, they use little, that's not a military strategy, that's a, it's not a political strategy need that. so as an article and they want to miss and with a very good book that i will use here are the quote to shannon and call them or

school said that launching into what is not the sharp edge of a cliff. but one can stand firmly look down and decide whether or not the punch or rather it's a slippery slope. and no one can be sure when the risk is the greatest, you just like know, without long distance how slight a basically a wall between russian. ok, well that's a really modern milli has other issues. ok, i suppose you would want to fight a well, you know, george, everyone knows ukraine ver while has been wishing to get into nato. it's part of their constitution after all. and then, you know, after the conflict started, they made a desperate attempt to get into the you. but on both accounts, you know, your perspective of the conflict. you know, the biggest strike against ukraine was corruption. but suddenly that strike is, is, is not a meaningful. ok, and that's what it seems to me. this is an amazing risk to con job. that the,

the west is more than willing to go along with at the expense of their own people. you cannot, if you go in mainstream, you cannot get you in the base energy security in europe. good security around the globe. and because they, this is this kind of a mirage of what, what they want to have that it's literally a raj, it's going to, it's going to be so many people around the world, particularly in europe and energy in a very, very sober hard way and very very soon, george biando is a remarkable fact is as you said at the expense of their own people, because nowhere in europe or in the united states has the people spoken out in favor of getting involved in ukraine. there's absolutely no support for this poles . and in the none of the polls, is there any interest at all in getting involved in your brain?

so this is entirely or war waged by the lease whose life the very comfortably they were very well remunerated. they go to very nice parties and conferences with lavish entertain. they want to continue this and when you watch them, yes. but what about shorter just what about energy shortage is what's going to happen this winter? wow. you know, the price of freedom, you know, is something that we have to pay, you know, freedom is a free of the buying. so they're happy to sign a sacrifice a wall that they can win. so happy to sacrifice the public for a protracted conflict in which the public is impoverished. and when somebody comes along to challenge us where they go or by again, he's only challenged in a very mild way. he's going along with nato and the sanctions and condemnation

russia. but he does say, hey, we've got to think about ourselves a little bit more immediately on the reject. and you know, we will wait for what's going to happen in italy because i think it's quite likely that kind of italian populace right will come to power sometime in september and it will come on a hearing will elicit payments a years ago. exactly. all the stuff that we know how day you break the consensus that this war has to be full in. definitely a want to turkey. he's the one that says, you know, he's, he's 30 comes up into the k maker. i mean, everyone is going to air on right now, because he's a member of nato and aspirin for the you. and he's just wanting all of his quote unquote out. so he spent a very lengthy trip in, so she came out smiling and was making himself a broker here. and so again,

challenging the united consensus against russia. it's again propaganda. finish up the 45. 0 yes, i mean the air go morally, is not a very good character, certainly is lot. as we say, rush a hero my role. but he's a great magic person and in the world the ruled by a lady all that is ready to sacrifice europeans, not only people who are areas of the world, but your opinions are suffering from their 46 now. and they, these people are ready to sacrifice them in this world as a bread. me just saw them, it stands out. or is it really, he's better than these. so called moral people in the, you know, and that's what it takes these kind of complex here. you see who's ideological, who's not, who's pragmatic and what policies work and policies that don't work. and the way

you get a year or a gentleman that's all the time. you want to think. we get some budapest here in moscow. and i want to thank you for watching us here. are remember, oh, a news media was cards. and like if you speak russian to keep your voice down while out and about a couple, don't put your human symbols on display a guy. so you guys from the bottom don't talk to strangers. i. 7 avoid noisy

gatherings a your friend think you're guilty because you'll rush a glad to with being a good time to work. oh well it shows the wrong one. i just don't know if you have to figure out the same because the answer to an engagement, it was the trail. when so many find themselves, well,

the part we choose to look for common ground and united states has always had a variety of tools to use and tax on other countries. economic sanctions or are often just the beginning. another thing you like to do is place some military pressure on the countries that you're talking about here. and there has to be an effort to demonize that country and the leader of that country. the. so we have a responsibility for the whole world and we need to make room for the rest because without us there will be care. mm.

mm. oh i know the buyer is reach between israel and the islamic. do you have the group in gaza with rockets, fire just minutes after it went into effect? a noticeable concerns on the part of the israeli army that there will be your response? oh, the military's firing right? it and r t correspondent is targeted and shot up by israeli military as firing intensifies that the israel palestine border multiple victims and buildings a blaze as ukraine continues it for a lot less attack on the don. yes, for public with more than 400.