ah, a with ukranian forces, a shell, a kindergarten in the done yet republic, reportedly wounding for children, wanting these images are disturbing us while a ukrainian strike kills an entire family, including 2 children in a pearson is set to arrive today. it was becky, it's done for a shanghai cooperation organization summit. and the thing is also the 1st over the trip for the chinese president since the condemning also on the program, the international committee of the red cross says the global hunger problem predate ukrainian conflict. despite the west flaming russia for being responsible for the

wealthy crisis with july, for my headquarters here in moscow, you're watching the internationally system 5 am here in the russian capital. i just got here with the top stories this hour. we start off with the latest from ukraine where family in fair to song was killed after ukrainian troops showed a residential area, not according to russian appointed. local officials are wanting to view as you may find the following images disturbing. 2 children and 2 adults died instantly at the scene as they crossed the road authority say that the u. s. livid high mars rocket was used in the attack. ukrainian city of care on is currently under russian control. over in the city of pet evolves kinda look, guns, republic, ukrainian shilling hits a local high school. according to local authorities,

one child died in the attack with 6 students wounded as well as a teacher. under the neighboring done, yet republic, ukrainian forces allegedly shelled a kindergarten in the city of dr. chives. 7 civilians were reportedly wounded including 4 children. now these are some unverified images from eye witnesses. meanwhile, russian lead forces have advanced in the dumbass forces of the wagner private military company have taken control of the key points near the city of shaw mosque . and these are the latest images from the area you can see an abandoned bunker here used by ukrainian forces. the entire area is located on a hill overlooking the surrounding area. the voted group is also engaged in battles for the city of offshore must. meanwhile,

a video has gone viral on ukrainian social media showing 2 children speaking to ukrainian soldier, boasting about killing russians. let's take a look. and yesterday we blew up a truck full of mines. we put gasoline on it, attached to grenade, said it on fire and it exploded. we also killed the russians. they began to bother us and we threw a grenade. it was a lot more called a bouquet. rwandan, genocide, survivor and co author of survivors uncensored so mean that such experiences can leave children deeply traumatized for the rest of their lives. i found the video extremely disturbing and actually discussing to the adults flooding children, taking part in a war. and it also brought a bunch of a lot of p p d for me personally being somebody who experienced the war at a young age. and so it was very disturbing for me to see adults why

around children walking about being a part of or you know, in this case, these children may not have actually done what they're saying they've done. still being exposed to such extreme violence is very damaging to children's brain and they grow into traumatized. adult children are usually very impressionable and it's easy to indoctrinate them with a certain ideology, especially when the ideologies popular. so whether it's not the, whether it's any other hate group, the targeting of children actually makes it easy because it's quite a round in the ground to, to, to plant the seeds of head and extremism. and be brought with that idea. let me approve is that arrive in summer county and south eastern is beckett's done later today. thursday where he will be one of 15 global leaders attending

a sun high corporation organization summit. we talked on major global issues on the agenda and some it starts on thursday and see if maria phenomena is down on the ground and massive gathering at a time of isolation while western institutions and the lion says, may be in decline. the shanghai corporation organization, or the as seo is fortunate, had to be a lead in power. hain, both military and economic fields globally. the shanghai corporation organizational f, as a real alternative to western century economic alliance. since all s c o members are committed to the formation of a more representative democratic justin, multi poder weld order based on university recognized principles of international law. security issues will be a priority. the 4th come and discussions as well as a move away from a western centric world order. the current summit, without exaggeration, is of a special nature since it takes place against the backdrop of large scale

geopolitical changes. there is presently a rapid and irreversible transformation in the entire arena of international relations, politics and economics. a new model is coming into being based on genuine multi polarity and dialogue. today their organization is uniting 18 states indifferent status as high their members observe his old dialogue partners with a combined population of 3000000000 people, literally as super power lines. and it is ready to expand as iran is getting ready to become a member state. and egypt and caught her have just received the status of 30 g partners. this year's summit is expected to become the biggest yet in the shanghai corporation acquisitions, more than 20 year history. 15 world leaders are coming to his becky storm to attend the event. russia's president wide more potent is expected to meet with his counterparts from china ended turkeys in by john and other countries to discuss global and regional issues for c. this would be the 1st in person meeting with the

russian leader and other heads of states. in a long time. the chinese side is willing to work with the russians side to continuously implement level strategic corporation between the 2 countries safeguard common interests and promote the development of the international order in a more just and reasonable direction. it put in more di meeting. he's also grabbing the attention of the press. the conversation on the international agenda with mr. moody will also take place. the sides will discuss issues of strategic stability, the situation in the asia pacific region. and of course, corporation within major multi lateral format such as the u. n. g 20. and the seo luez is working hard on trying to isolate russia, not only sanctioning the country itself, but also punishing all those who want to be friends with moscow. but with an i c o summit like these here is, it seems their efforts are not quite working revolutionary artie from samarkand in

back, his son or the 50 leaders of the young i corporation organization are expected to hold bilateral meetings with their counterparts. the summit is also the 1st overseas trip for the chinese president since the beginning of the pandemic. but it remains to be seen if you'll meet with the indian prime minister for negotiations. that's after military standoff between the states. back in 202080 india contributor artie ticker feels as in on the possibility of talks between the 2. there's a strong probability that the bilateral meeting with children being and premise from or the will happen because i, you see, recently there has been a disengagement of the chinese troops and the indian troops on the line of factory control in northern parts of india, which is lead doc and that has opened a vendor opportunity for the 2 leaders to actually now sit down and talk about

other issues. i think it's quite likely that this will happen. india certainly looking to be a major player because we have just replaced united kingdom as the 5th largest economy in the world. so we will be seeking our importance and significance as an economy. also remember shown guy, cooperation organization, amounts to 42 percent population of the world. so this meeting is significant. it will represent the point of view of 42 percent of people of the world as well as 25 percent of gross domestic product to which these 42 percent population in the world produces moving on. now global hunger problems long predates the ukranian conflicts, according to the president of the international committee of the red cross. if we talk about hunger today, it's not because of the ukraine warren. we have seen the indicators of

a food security crisis, emerges in africa for much longer than the escalation that we have seen in the ukranian war. it has been as a complicating factor. it has exacerbated some of the problems that we have seen before. but the 1st thing, the k, there's i had more than a year ago when from our hospitals into the health. when comparing notes with doctors without borders and their impressive network of hospitals in africa. we started to look at the weight figures of entries into hospitals. despite the west blaming russia many expert and n g o had warned, looming crisis before the conflicts and ukraine. moscow has long been advocating humanitarian help for countries in need to mitigate ongoing food shortages on the

time to deal with ukraine to ship greens, african countries over the majority of the food has only been taken to wealthy states instead. and this comes amid billions of 8 packages allocated to help you crane a you and agencies worn about farming like conditions in the horn of africa, where the 22000000 people faced severe problems. the more than 7000000 have been forced to migrate us according to the world food program. malnutrition remains high with about 10000000 children under the age of 5 suffering. earlier we spoke to a dom, gaba, who one time intended to run for the nigerian presidency in 2023. and he says, the climate change on the west functions that guns against russia have contributed to africa's crisis. the problem has been ongoing for a long time and it has a lot of things that has to do with the destruction of resources that we have from the wisdom colonial powers. that how long a short time,

major issue that we get from other countries where they come here will to course like russia has a great afternoon equipment. you can ship brains to some part of africa. discontinue, again, ensure that we can issue you security in there. just so that families come over to tom and the thought is that the european powers. 1 department because they have met on 26th regarding the climate change. let don't fulfill just forms the loop and about $100000000000.00 africa. so that we can be able to get a copy of the problem is the telephone shot and what a was in africa to georgia. well, buy a new one about a, you know, he's africa and in the central african republic, like i'm in charge of, i don't get from what i wanted that a willing to offer to just about function blocked them simply because you had

usually you decided to deny i'm opportunity for us to work, you know, to so by newly declassified us intelligence report claims that russia has spent $300000000.00 on meddling in foreign elections in 24 countries over the last 8 years. moscow has consistently rejected all allegations of any instance, though the claims are of great concern to the us. what russia is doing around the world in terms of its election, meddling is also an insult. on sovereignty is an effort to ship away at the ability of people around the world to choose the government that they see best fit to represent them to represent their interests to represent their values. meanwhile, washington has spent a total of 8 trillion dollars on its was across the middle east, north africa,

unself central asia. that's over 2 decades. according to research by the watson institute for international and public affairs brown university. more than 2 trillion dollars was spent on the war and the gun is done, which ended with the u. s. withdrawal. one year ago. or 3rd journalist daniel lazar says that he doesn't believe the u. s. reports about russia's interference thing. the us itself had meddled in dozens of elections in other countries. the state department report, the c i a 4 is just ludicrous. i'm in a corner to a study at carnegie mellon university. the u. s. interfered and 62 election foreign elections during the cold war. after the cold war, interfered and elections intervened in the elections and havi, afghanistan, and elsewhere. i've been no position. however, given the information i put out in

2016, 18 over russian political and interference in the us the, the, the information was that's completely false, totally bad information based on that, there is no reason to believe the latest allegation. united nations special reports has called for the removal of unilateral sanctions on iran in a report. the details, the effects of decades of embargoes in the country. a job insurance in the united states has

imposed most of the sanctions begin in way back in 979. the u. australia and canada have also joined most of them, targets banks, companies and individuals linked to the nuclear field on the military, industrial complex goal trading transactions with iranian currency and public debts, as well as the sale of dollars to the reigning governments have also been targeted back in 2018, a former us president donald trump announced the u. s. would withdraw from the joint comprehensive plan of action which is also known as the rainy nuclear deal. us imposed multiple new non nuclear sanctions, which were condemned by a run as a violation of the deal in the reports which was published on monday ayana. do hon said that they had effected nearly every aspect of life in the country or let's cross lie now to christopher halle, political analyst and researcher, to further discuss this subject refer, welcome, swati. thank you very much for having me. what do you make of this report?

by the un rapport, sir, do you think the sanctions imposed on iran could be lifted in the near future? i think number one that the report is, is a bum show, but it's a bump so that all of us the new was a reality for the past decade. and i think that nothing is going to change. for example, the trump administration elevated the sanctions to what they called the maximum pressure campaign. and the biden administration has further enhanced those sanctions. so it's a bipartisan consensus in washington to increase the sanctions on iran at the behest of israel. and i think that the dangerous part here is that the think sions are not affecting what they are claiming in washington, and that they're affecting the i are just the piece or their, affecting the different factors, be the military new for commercial. they're affecting ordinary iranians and are affecting the ability to get medicine, their ability to get food and their ability to function and live

a dignified life. i mean, i don't see the things and ending anytime soon. and i see this campaign as another act of terrorism in war against the iranian people from the u. s. side, which obviously imposed most of the sanctions they were declaimed, they are aimed at reducing where they believe already an effort to build a nuclear weapon. how would you respond to that christopher? i think that's laughable because, you know, the u. s. is you know, puppets in the region and their, their best ally in the region. israel has nuclear weapon has never publicly stated that they, that they have them. we know from the high venue and all of these heroes who were whistleblowers about their program, it remains top secret. they have not signed the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. they won't allow inspectors into their atomic energy and the nuclear facilities. and yet at the same time, they put pressure on iran civilian nuclear program to open its doors wide open. and

right, and iran with the military strikes on their nuclear facilities. i think that this, the double standard is, is part of the nature of the rogue states. that is the united states and that of the region. that is israel. so i think that's absolutely. iran has any, has the inalienable right to have a civilian nuclear program. but this double standard has to end in the region. now, crystal more recently the us impose sanctions on iranian companies that were accused of helping to transfer iranian drones to russia for use in ukraine. how will these functions further affect the country or is it already been saturated by sanctions? and you think that washington is trying to completely isolate iran from the rest of the world. i think i think the west absolutely is trying to isolate iran from the rest of the world. the only problem is that they're isolating everyone simultaneously. the russians, the iranians, the chinese, the venezuela, the cubans, as in bob when everybody,

so everybody's coming together on the other side and thing, we need to build a new world order. we need to build the most of the polar world order, where we are not, you know, under the gemini, of the west and under the petro dollar. and so, i think ultimately, what you're seeing is, is a blowback, that the u. s. is trying to put all the things in the, all the, on the iran, on russia, on other countries around the world over 30 countries or under us sanctions and western things. but what you're seeing is the development of new economic structures to move away from the dominant ones that the u. s. and the west controls . and so ultimately, you know, iran said bring on the thanks and because there is, there is something new brewing and washington is very unhappy with your words. we'll see obviously again, also traction in russia. christopher lolly, political analyst and research. thank you very much for sharing your thoughts today on the un report. thank you very much. the you risk being shackled into slavery. the key of its members approve,

newly proposed ukrainian security guarantees. that's according to the russian foreign minister, earlier our team, corresponding eager has done of discuss the details of the paper with my colleague royce, who she the very basic bottom line is of with these of these proposals that have been drawn up by the way, by cave and nato together is to provide ukraine with all perks that a natal member state gets, but without actually declaring or ukraine and giving it the status of a member state of this block essentially. or there are a few points here. for example, a bunch of european nations and nato members faith, they will be obliged, according to these proposals, to invest into ukraine to provide ukraine with arms shipments. secondly, they would pledge military action in case ukraine's well security is compromised. in case you crane is threatened, or they will be conducting joint exercises, nato,

and key of and so on and so forth. the proposed guarantors of all this would be the u. s. u k, canada, a bunch of european nations like poland, italy, and et cetera. and so they would have the same obligations in front of ukraine are as they do in front of any other nato member state preventive measures like when the realms of the military finance. so it is really an all encompassing an effort is, is an all encompassing proposal that is very, very much global are and in its magnitude, it could be very significant when it comes to both the fates of ukraine and well, the natal block, his house, zalinski, and his nato counterpart, how the, well, how they discussed and how they announced this, these proposals have allison, this one. this is the key issue. this great before step thing as a one. possible way. you've done a great job to all he's done

a lot and work together as a team lead, but this is just the 1st step he put in that the 1st but an essential step. ellen dozer, who is keith once this deal here, once this, out of the proposal state and drawn to something more concrete. because again, it is quite a lopsided key of gets everything. the american military industrial complex gets loads of money, a loads of orders under europe, world, europe has to provide everything kind of sounds like this is all going to be crossing one over putin's red lines. you got to tell me here, what kind of reaction are we getting out of moscow to this? well in moscow, in the kremlin now, they did not missed their words. they said that it was due a direct path to world war 3. this is a quote to, by russia's former president of course, the tree madrid of. and again, this goes of is, brings nothing to the table when it comes to, you know, restoring peace in europe if you like it, it does exactly the opposite. because if you rewind towards, you know,

february january, december, when russia, when moscow was voicing its security concerns, it wanted exactly the opposite. this was the main reason that russia started. it's what it calls a special military operation because it did not want ukraine to potentially sometime become a nato member state. here's how this these proposals were described by the spokeswoman of the russian foreign ministry. marie has a heart of again, have a listen, please good. it this will time hands of the european union in such a way and put them under such savage, several dependent definitely will never recover to their full my economic growth and development is now that they in such a difficult situation. they have proposed such a terrible shackleton and to find in their blood, yet it will be a never ending horror. oh, so we have this kind of further coagulation of ukraine or kia with it. so western professional partners here, we've had a reaction out of moscow that was pretty firm, one might say, any reaction out of brussels yet?

well, so far there's no indication that these proposals were drawn up in any shape or form together with brussels. it's as if they were held almost like held hostage. so this is what we're getting, this would keep is going to get, this is what the us is going to get and you are going to provide everything. so again, time and time again, we've been hearing these statements coming out of brussels coming out to various european countries. they're saying, okay, we are eager to provide money to loan money to ukraine, to provide weapons heavy military equipment as well. but only to a certain point, and the many nations have already stepped forward saying that the limit has been reached if they were to send more weapons to ukraine than they would be taking them away from their own forces. so, but no can do. and almost up to every statement we, we've seen more and more alms pouring into ukraine, including from europe to, from the united states, of course, a lot of them, but from europe as well. it's as if they're being strong armed into providing more

and more weapons. so that they potentially could, later, will strike deals and, you know, purchase said weapons from the united states because their own safety and security is being compromised by all by this, you know, by, they still flow by the stream of military equipment that they are providing to ukraine. so europe, it doesn't seem that europe is excited about this thing or from on this. let's cost live now to scott ritter form a us marine corps intelligence officer. scott, thank you very much for joining us here on our tea. know, 1st of all, i'd just like to get your thoughts. what do you make of this proposal by these security guarantees? well, i mean, the one hand, we know that security guarantees have been discussed in the past. we know that the, in the a stumble negotiations that took place earlier this year, i know there was discussion about the security guarantees rusher, actually was

a offering itself as a guarantor of security. but those, those discussions fell apart on that. the, his property, you guarantee security. when a conflict is already underway, what guarantee can you provide? one day, you're not part of the conflict the next day. you are, if this was implemented and with the conflict still under way in short nation signing on is guarantors of security. would be declaring war against russia. and that is suicide. so it literally isn't going to happen. i mean, this is, this is something that people can put forward for political purposes to be discussed. but until there's actual cessation of hostilities and we can have a nice foundation based upon 0 hostilities only then does a security guarantee a make any sense. otherwise, literally anybody signing on as

a guarantor of ukraine security, while ukraine is engaged in military operations against russia is signing a declaration of war. and i just think that so absurd, that no serious person would ever consider enough even after the fashion of hostilities. thing thing, even then that the western nato probably wouldn't find these guarantees, given the effect that he would have, you know, on russian how that big accepted here would rush has made it clear that it's not going to accept to still meet that it's going to accomplish the objectives of the, of the special military operation, which include both demilitarization and d. not just for cation. there's no way that the current government and ukraine can survive either one of those cleansing operations. so

i think it's your fantasy to speak about the zelinski government existing in a post conflict environment where it would receive security guarantees. i think whatever ukraine looks like once this conflict is over, it will look anything like what's in there today. it will be a completely different political makeup and only then can the issue of security guarantees a be realistic. and at that point time, i doubt many nato, a european union. you nation would want to sign on because by signing on they would be cementing the legality and the finality of whatever victory russia is able to achieve. here was one of the red lines, the russia lay down before the start of this conflict. now, according to this proposal, bike you have one of the gun and says, is turkey. how suitable do you think uncover is for this role? look to turkey in russia has

a very interesting relationship. one that is simultaneously friendly in nature and the other one which has them on the verge of a military conflict. you know, turkish military forces are in opposition to russian or russian aligned military forces in libya and syria and india, south caucuses, the armenian azerbaijani conflict. but turkey also has been an effective negotiating partner with russia negotiating this is drain deal in working with russia on expanded economic relation. so i think turkey, actually, of all the nations mentioned might be of the most realistic guarantor security. because a turkey isn't going to enter a such a commitment with an anti russian focus. i think they would be entering that such a commitment a with a sincere effort to prevent future conflict. but again, turkey is going to have a problem because.