a what i see the senior bus is the little gear lation says, do you don't bob? with 411th grade, we learned that natural socialism or not is good. they were heroes of ukraine, or correspondence uncovered nationalist propaganda in school textbooks as it travels to the city of scott, those in ukraine, scarce on region. nato admit it had been planning to expand its military presence along russia. border years ago before the war and ukraine begun completely ignoring moscow's red line. a betrayal of the afghan

people that are local so funded us plans to transfer 3 and a half $1000000000.00 of frozen african assets per swiss franc. we hear from the cowboy central bank, i had left one of the rightful owners of the frozen assets or the afghan people, the decision of the us to transfer one part of that amount to a swiss bank is totally illegal according to international law. and not so happy birthday as the cia marxist 75th anniversary. we look at the track record of the agency, flaws and control. this is a very warm welcome see from the russian capital this monday morning. my name is peter scott and welcome to the program. wherever you join us, we start off with the latest developments in ukraine where battles continue for the kafka region. here for how to preview, they announced

a complete takeover of the city of coupons saying that russian led forces that left the eastern part of the city. however, it has been reported that fighting is ongoing and that russian troops continued to hold defensive lines along the osco river, which runs through the settlements and controlling the eastern parts of co pianist . amid battles following a ukrainian counter offensive in the region are thieves from rud goes? dea has travelled behind the front line to the city of scot dorski in the harrison region, and he sent us this report. the russian national guard behind the front lines. they wage a different kind of war. fresh intelligence is coming. ukrainian nationalist, part of a sleepless shelf has given himself away. national god sped, thou get the go ahead. do you have anything illegal? no. stay down hans, behind your head. with hands up. what with the bay,

they asked me to keep an eye on something back there by the gate, the modem. you know, what do you have? you have this one. i have no idea. i didn't even have a look at this is get a sapir over there. these are our g, d, 5 grenades, 2 f, one grenades, also 210 rounds of 5.45 caliber ammunition. in almost every case, the excuse is the same. someone asked them to watch a weapon or a bomb cache for a couple of days. it almost every case turns out they live in, craig is waging a massive terror campaign in areas his abandoned loss. he of has opted for car bombings, assassinations, and tara almost entirely aimed at civilians. those ukrainians who dare side with

russia. it can be a death threat, a bullet, a bomb, or a tactical misha. sca dobbs far from the front lines and the little military value was recently targeted by a barrage of ukrainian touch. good me, selves. 2 was shot down. one wasn't for the vowels. hello, guys. cliff alyssa, no, but i would honestly wear, but if as a thing of which coal don't i tell stella ne lasonya are you fighting region? one of us can last. i didn't usually if both of whatever thought in the by needful whitfield. but at the morning, i do wish to simulate your model to use the peculiar adventure in a copy of abuse and vienna from dr. for me. the steps that have been used in the eyes of ukrainian nationalists, the locals, deadly seen, was to accept russian control. they adjusted to a new life, t, f,

that he's unforgivable and makes seem surprising. the school rather what was found here to be to misers rushes argument that is had no choice but to white schools were being turned into temples for radical nationalism. these are some of the textbooks that have been removed, miss rickland, ukrainian students, for example, here in these textbook, 5th grade, the textbook, we learn that the, my dog revolution was the right and just thing. and this was written by the people who were behind the my dod revolution. they went straight to the kids in another textbook. they seized 411th grade. as we learned that natural socialism or nazis were good. they were heroes of ukraine. here you have own bach, propaganda posters. he's with nazi collaborators. yet, kids a towards that they were heroes of ukraine, that russia has always been

a drag on ukraine and has always abused ukrainians. we learned that i'm on to k, which was a hero. you crate. these zonati collaborator behind the deaths of thousands of jews in, in just one instance that has been verified and proved you also found the number of course, works with essays, written by students. 11th grade, this again, they were made to write as a about step on by better step on but better. who is people normally collaborated with nazis offered them their help put in money. since lou massa could $60000.00 to push civilians to make way for pure blooded ukrainian, that's of course includes indoctrinating the young pumping them full of hate before they know any better. but that is now the past. they stood him until j at that,

so we'll keep it all in an archive. we won't destroy the books, they will be captain allen museum. we will replace them with textbooks. the trasha has already started to supply, and i'm sure there will be more supplies in the future. the school somehow kept its heritage the museum here choose history as it was a modified by political trends and nationalist dogma. ukrainians and russians learning and living side by side in peace and harmony for generations. but i wanna show you something as we from here, a little girl. her 2nd read what that to our driver and gave them these picture her and the soldier and the rainbow. life here is going to be very, very different. more i'd gasdio r t from scott dos his own region.

and moving on. now, nato has revealed it punter increases military presence on russia's borders. years ago, before the conflicts and ukraine broke out enough despite moscow wanting the lions not to cross, it's red lines with more on how nato reneged on the promised that it would not move one inch to the east. his fiorella isabel, despite russia's clearly marked red lines on nato expansion. the west has been blaming russia all this time painting putin as the villain and saying his actions in ukraine were, quote, unprovoked nato is a defense alliance. they said, however, it turns out the blog had planned to expand its presence eastward towards russia's borders. years ago, long before the current conflict began and ukraine, we're talking about the biggest overhaul of our military structures. since 1949, the planning for that started several years ago. but now we're implementing it. it

seems nails defense chiefs didn't hold back, emphasizing a need to sustain and increase allied support to ukraine, the addition of finland and sweden and highlighting that nato will back ukraine for as long as it takes with one collective priority. collectively, we must deny russia the possibility to change today's rule based international order. yet if you look at nato's official policy with russia and the promises from western politicians, things read a little different. nato enlargement is not directed against russia, nato, as a defensive alliance. every country that joins nato undertakes to uphold its principles and policies. this includes the commitment that nato does not see confrontation and poses no threat to the russian federation. we set out to build a good relationship with russia. if we maintain a presence in germany, that is

a part of nato, there would be no extension of nato's jurisdiction for forces of nato, one inch to the east. it appears that the west is peaceful words have it exactly followed their actions as russian president vladimir putin pointed out, back in february. them when we have promised that they would not push nato's infrastructure eastward even one inch. every one is well aware of that. they said one thing, and they did another, as we say, in our country, they cheated us. they deceived us, and put in isn't the only one. many western analyst and journalists have long admitted to nato's arrogant and toned death policy towards russia over the last quarter of a century. warning that continued expansion eastward would not end well. it would be extraordinarily difficult to expand nato eastwood without that actions being viewed by russia is unfriendly. even the most modest schemes would bring the alliance to the borders of the old soviet union. and what these actions of

expanding eastward actually accomplished for the west other than higher energy cost and a potential dark winter. well, it looks like european nations have rapidly angered their own citizens into mass protests against nato and its disastrous economic consequences. ah . though all nato nations promised not to cross russia's red lines, promised not one inch east, and promised that pose no threat to russia. a detailed paper trail of their actions shows the complete opposite. their most recent admission vindicates russia, but also shows that the block hasn't been transparent. and that pompous attitude has not done them any favors economically or with their own increasingly outraged

populations. well, jonah's live now is brian better take former us marine and geopolitical analyst. brian, thanks so much for joining us here on ot see this monday morning, and thank you for having me. just pleasure to have, you know, these, these, this nato official. he's admitted that they begun to plan to increase the presence closer to russia. how significant do you think this admission is, brian? i think it adds to a body of evidence. that's clear for all to see that nato has, has never been a defensive alliance. that has always been an alliance of a russian. people can just look at a map of nato expansion, post cold war, and see that all it has done is expand toward brushes, borders, and we have people from st. tanks like the atlantic council under, by, by nato and data members, openly admitting that there and goals to eventually include russia under this

international rules based order, conveniently, led by the united states. now russia is oversee, over the years, repeatedly warned nate, so of its red lines. this has been going on for decades. now. do you think the hard nato engaged more proactively with russia? we've been a very different situation today. i mean, there was a time when russia was even talking about jordan, nate, so a couple of decades ago. absolutely. the, the collective west had a choice. they were at a crossroads where they could have chose to begin a construct of relationship with the rest of the worlds. but instead they chose to attempt to assert themselves upon the rest of the world, including russia. nato expansion of russia's orders is just one part of that story . we can see a western lead aggression unfolding all around the globe all during the decades. now, do you think the u. s. would feel if the situation were reversed and resort china

how to base as close to america as nato does, you know, to russia. exactly, and that's what people need to do as they are skeptical about the claim that nato was crossing all of these red lines. just think about it. if it was reversed the united states when tolerate it, not for a moment. now we have this phrase, the not one inch forward, phrase that russia believes nato broke, and there is some debates around it. some people think it refers to all of europe. some people think it's just germany. but what do you see for the future expansion of nato, obviously filling in sweden adjoining? do you think that in the future of a fund as far as the asia pacific reason, obviously, region, obviously there's the concerns about china and taiwan. they will certainly try it's, it's up to the bay will the, they'll be successful or not. we can be the high cost that not just the victims of nato, but the, the membership of nate out the,

the high price that they are paying for this policy of aggression, expansion and belligerence. i think we're going to be that highlighted, especially this winter across europe. do you think it's sustainable to support the nato can keep supplying to ukraine? now i, we already see nato members reaching the limits of, of their inventories. they're talking about supplying weapons that they are going to produce. and that the timeline is not in weeks or months, but actually years not that that buy at face value is not sustainable. well, yeah, we've definitely heard some, some stories about this countries actually really low on supplies now. and would you agree with the nature of the search and that is a defensive parts exclusively now, and we, we can just look at afghanistan or libya and we can see to clear examples where nato claimed that it was acting in its self defense, but was clearly waging wars of aggression,

wars of aggression that are still impacting the people in, in both countries to the day. well, brian bell at tech, i'm afraid that's all we have time for former us marine geopolitical analysts. thank you very much for sharing your thoughts for those today on that. the admission that nato plans to expand towards russia years ago. thank you very much. thank you. the u. s. is set to transfer parts of afghanistan's national bank in switzerland. the central bank of afghanistan has condemned. the decision is illegal, miss mila had let the rightful owners of the frozen assets or the afghan people. yeah, we had this money for foreign trade payments. the decision of the us to transfer one part of that amount to a swiss bank, establishing an institution there to disperse the money to hand it over to some private organization. setting their own rules for political purposes is totally illegal according to international law. how can they refuse to transfer that money

to our central bank? this is a betrayal of the afghan people, the people's will and consent was totally ignored. and the afghan central bank was not consulted. we denounced c u. s. decision make that the u. s. administration says it's will not release money directly to an afghan institution as there's no guarantee that civilians that will benefit from it. as the taliban sees power in afghanistan, the u. s. froze around $7000000000.00 of afghan assets. us presidents then ordered half of that amount, $3500000000.00 to finance payments from lawsuits by $911.00 victims. meanwhile, afghanistan faces a severe humanitarian crisis. on saturday, hundreds of afghans protested against the us. fun to send parts of afghans us as to that. swiss bank demonstrates his waived banners with slogans blame in the us for the humanitarian crisis in the country. they called for the immediate, on freezing of the assets and the prosecution of soldiers who committed war crimes in the country. america won the americans have no rights to seize. are

$9000000000.00. they have violated human rights and have gustavo, it is unfair if they don't give us our money back. we are a poor country and face a terrible situation to, to are very low per capita income. america seized $9000000000.00 from us and now they see they will transfer a $3500000000.00 to a swiss bank. we're a stubborn country under taliban rule, and our central bank is fully functional. that would amanda united nations and other world bodies influence the united states to transfer the money directly to our government can be spent on getting people. during the last 2 decades, the americans did not serve our nation. they instead betrayed us by bombing, or homeless and massacring our people at a large scale they killed our children, attacked our wedding parties, and bombed our funeral. we appeal to the united nations to convict american and british military generals and bring them to justice,

our award winning journalist and editor march in j does the u. s. has imposed harsh restrictions to gain leverage over the taliban? i think the case of the start of money is just one more element of it. obviously, the initiative defines, taken ministration to transfer the funds to switch to the home, the money in the account, not likely in the short term. so the money's going to be transferred to the conditions, the replies for the money to actually be transferred to afghanistan. very strict. indeed, they're playing the gemini cough and also saying to the africans with tyler bonds. look, let's your central bank distance is elicited from you. let your central bank agree to a few conditions that we lay down and then we'll let you have the money, you know, and we'll trust the central bank distributor accordingly to the very, very desperate corners of the country. this is a way of controlling our country. this is

a way of getting the taliban to itself in order sunday mugs 75 years since the creation of the main u. s. foreign intelligence agency, the ca, while us president joe biden has previous the praise. the agency is the bedrock of national security correspondent, the trend code takes a look back. the ca is often floored and controversial track record. just how old is what supposedly the world's most powerful intelligence force. it may seem the see i should date back to the early years of the us itself. but in fact, it's even younger than the man who's currently president. the agency only appeared after world war 2 and failed at what was most expected of it back in the days to predict the conception of the 1st soviet nuclear weapon, time to flick through the archives thing.

on the basis of the evidence. now in our possession, it is estimated that the earliest date by which it is remotely possible that the ussr may have completed its 1st atomic bomb is mid 1950. but the most probable date is believed to be mid 1953. the words of one of the 1st central intelligence directors from 1948 silenced by the sound of the soviet union's 1st nuclear bomb test. in 1949, as the agency celebrates his anniversary, veterans will probably speak of their own glory, like former director, my compare did. a few years ago, i was the c i director, we live. we cheated was the thought that we had with entire entire training courses into it. remind you of the glory of the american experiment.

the word glory. next to lying, cheating and stealing. perhaps that sounds okay. if your head of the cia glory i was through throughout its history, the cia had multiple failures. it has also been shaken by a large number of scandals and disclosures. surround the operations, it has conducted a significant number of these operations were attempts to topple legitimate governments. heads of states both successful and unsuccessful. once more warriors, or rather long list of the agencies mistakes or cases when it was involved in some of the. busy worlds nastiest practices, nothing to do with america security going back to failures, sticking to nukes. the next thing that comes to mind is how the c, i initially didn't expect soviet warheads at americas doorstep and cuba. we all know how they got that one terribly wrong. staying with the 19 sixties and cuba,

the failed bay of pigs invasion should rang a few bells. events that turned out to be a surprise for the agency include the 1973 young key, poor war in the middle east, or the 1979 revolution in iran. the seventy's, the late seventy's, were high point for the soviet union. the you, us was in terrible state, i think after after the combined setbacks of the being run out of southeast asia, soviet influence in africa and angola with through their cuban clients was growing . and then we moved into 19, we went through the carter period, which was a low period for ca. beyond that supposed low period, even the breakup of the soviet union in 1991, came out of the blue for langley. but most notably the see i couldn't predict and

prevent 911. the intelligence community struggle throughout the nineties and up to $911.00. to collect intelligence on and analyze the phenomenon of transnational terrorism. the combination of an overwhelming number of priorities for budgets. and now it's know, the structure and bureaucratic rivalries resulted in insufficient response to this new challenge. but surprise, surprise, deal with intelligence said they found weapons of mass destruction in iraq hoops, deliberate or not. that was a mistake too. and moving on to the most recent past. oh, that's painful. what did the c i do about the taliban resurrecting in ghana stand last year. we're back to where we were 25 years ago. afghan gorillas have defeated a superpower and made their country and inviting hostile for a new generation of aspiring terrorists. and the ca will have very few american spies on the ground to assess that threat. be it solid. been logged in with his

archive or the taliban and it's 2021 resurgence. it's widely seen that washington is still dealing with the consequences of how the c i a flooded of ghana stand with weapons in cash in the 1980s. all to try and deal the soviet union a fatal blow. i had a $1000000000.00 a year. i had a new weaponry. i had $250000.00, more or less the fall and part time afghans willing to stand up and fight. but there are many more archive pages to be flipped through the scope of controversy. the agency has been subject of is truly impressive, ranging from allegations of drug trafficking, when backing the anti communist contrast in nicaragua to claims of widespread portrait and secret prisons all around the world. many cast physical american

legislation, bands, human torture, but only on us oratory. subsequently, there is no american law that forbids using these measures outside of the us. these measures include experiments on people using various medications, hypnosis and other physical impacts. naturally, these are issues that should not be a part of intelligence agencies, scope of activity. oh, what a reputation. sadly, it even makes you want to replace the word intelligence in the name with a few other words folks who were bother him to see how he has performed functions throughout the past. decades that show it is not purely an intelligence agency, but an instrument of the u. s. aggressively imposing its policy and neglecting international norms and laws. this policy is hedge, a monic, and aggressive towards other countries. well, happy birthday ca ah, and finally, the biden administration has recently pointed to the importance of controlling the

digital asset sector. while saying the u. s. government should identify current gaps in crypto currency regulation, british crypto experts, chris ends. it claims that the u. s. is trying to control crypto currency as well as to seek in to monopolize bitcoin. chris ems is on the f. b i's wanted list for organizing a crypto conference in north korea and allegedly helping the country evade us sanctions. he was accused of helping north korea develop block chain technologies to transfer money across borders. it was entertained in february, in saudi arabia, but later released as ria decided not to extradite him to the u. s. while earlier, my colleague donal quarter, got more details from chris m himself in our studio. you were detained in saudi arabia, the u. s. the f b i wants you because you were in north korea and some sort of block chain conference, give us the story. so i was indicted by the by the f

b i back in the end of january this year for violating us sanctions that are only a pickable u. s. people, as you can probably tell from accent on a north american british. and so that was the long parade of trying to leave saudi arabia where i was at the time where i was detained for a month based on an and supposed read notice and the f b i most wanted listing i was in jet the time in which president biden visited saudi arabia. i don't think it went well for him at all. i think that you know, that the days are gone in which the us can truly and cajoled countries even like saudi arabia, one of their closest allies. and so i think that, yeah, you're absolutely right. that played a very big part in, in my freedom to me being his speaking for today. what exactly happened at this conference in north korea? so the thing is done absolutely nothing. this is the crazy thing, right? it's, you know, there's really stories of meeting the sanctions dodging mastermind. it's only cost

me money. i never made a penny. i think the russian federation has a huge opportunity right now to embrace crypto currency to regulate the space. i'm for regulation in order to make sure that you know, sort of money laundering in a sort of crimes. use the crypto, but to really use it to engage in trade with the world. because essentially that's what crypto it's dawn. it's designed to liberate the world from and to create calmness and free trade. and there's a lot more than just bitcoin, right? so, you know, we have, we have stable quincy box one to one on any weaker encrypted currency. but that would be like us dollars roubles years. and those things are of genuine wet, genuine, the right remittance methods that can be used by anyone. but the great thing is that can be used by anyone. no one can stop them, which is exactly why i believe the u. s. targeted me in the 1st place with thing that tried to control control crypt currency. we're seeing them trying

to monopolize specifically bitcoin right now. but they, the, the, one of the things that they don't really understand the underlying technology, it's encrypt. so we wouldn't say multiplied it, we'd say the centralized, right? the centralized community of people, the fed up with this narrative. we're thing these, the sanctions where basically we're being told who you can be friends with, who you can invite to come to your house. you know, if, if, if i live in london, i can't get my friends them off, get to fly in and see me. and people are fed up with it because we live we, we live in this multi part of, well, i believe already the internet has changed the world phenomenally. and what we would call and crypt web to we now moving into web 3, which is just going to enhance that and open up the wall to even more possibilities . those are the main stories at 9 30 am moscow time. that's all for me, peter scott was i'll be passing the button on to don quarter, who will be here in about half an hour's time. thanks for your company. who's.