vast event, how successful baited what does custody and starvation wasn't by rising food prices thus complicating can yes. roadmap to was delivering good quality of life to our citizens. we cannot afford to waste another moment debating the merits of doing something because of the doing nothing. it would soon be too late to revise the course of events and then even the best possible interventions would not suffice. wagner potent has also pointed out that in this unstable situation in the world where i should think about its own food security and here. sure, there will be no problems with that as base here, the harvest promises to be a record, har experts say that it may easily reach 150000000 tons of grain of which 2 thirds will be so desperately needed wheat. that's all for now. we should check out our t, v dot com for all the latest breaking news and up days we'll see you right back

here at the top of the hour. ah, ah, i with welcome to wells and for being a generous friend and enemies, and maxim advocated by many ethical and religious traditions, which until recently, also had its place in geo politics. the whole corpus of international law was written and upheld on the promise of a minimum of stability that states would show to one another as

a safeguard against an all out war. possibly bring that spirit back to global affairs. well, to discuss that, i'm now joined by a drill cassandra london base political analysts and a week consulting. and drill is great to talk to you. thank you very much for your time. thank you for having my pleasure. given the fact that you're joining us from london, which is a very rare treat for me to say, i want to start from afar and mention the lecture that i attended just this past weekend, about the arthurian legends which are very, very popular in russia as well. as this whole spirit of dignity and honor that can author, he's nice espoused and it was just about the values. it was also about their dedication and loyalty to one another. got me thinking, you know, we hear these things a lot about the western unity and how it's been solidified in opposing russia.

but when we look at their fax and the policies, the western countries are conducting towards one another. other being fair or generous to to each other or even to their own people. oh, thank you for asking me this question. i think that the 1st of all, i would start with saying that you know, this on and dignity. it should be placed on the part of the fairy tales because we are fed with the information that you know the being truthful to your fellow human being. go to your fellow country, man, is something that should be, you know, out when you grow up as an other person. but what we can see, and what we can see before our, in our own eyes, is that, you know, each car and see is for themselves. the european union can't have a coherent foreign policy because each country has its own national interest. so if

you have a thumb of, of different countries with different geographical positions, different historical heritage is, is really difficult to, to, you know, to, to form certain coherent, geopolitical or g o cannot make a policy. what we are seeing now is the block is divided or split. and also when you asking the question whether europe in countries are coherent or whether they, they, they, they don't agree when it comes to the policy of the ukraine. we can see that the populations within each and every country in europe is against this very night rate, if on this very foreign policy push against russia. 2 because it is backfiring, i mean they high energy prices which are just contributing to the high inflation

guarantee. people want using the food banks. i mean, the situation on the ground is horrible, but we saw time and 5 again from, from the so called lead us, that this is the price to pay for our values. you mentioned the, the issue of narrative and what is being sold to the people and i think it's also parallel. the typical lot of they are who are legends in a sense that there would be a fair maiden. that was abused in some sense that would come to this round table and ask for support them. this is essentially the narrative that we're hearing from the was this innocent pure ukraine that was for some reason attacked by this horrible monster from the north without no prior, no justification. does this narrative correspond to the dual political realities of the last couple of decades as you perceive them or, you know, as has been documented in global history?

not really, not really. anyone who is familiar with this equation from the very beginning. i mean, it started with, i mean, in 2006, the robert kagan was quite explicit. the color revolution and moving nato was to ukraine, will serve to expand the west and liberal germany. so if one is wants to say truthful to, to, to the fact rather than the rate of it doesn't correspond. but the plot that you mention corresponds with the people's imagination because we all prefer when the good, you know, be evil, right? so it is triggering a certain path has been our thinking in order to, you know, to manage a consent with them within the populations throughout the world, or predominantly in the, in the west to, to, you know, to support even though that it is backfiring. and it's, i think,

the size in the west and other parts of the region as, especially in the global out. so no, it doesn't correspond, but it, it, this skillfully used to, to, to make this aside the compliance and, and willing to suffer. but as we seem in from, in the possibly, in italy, in germany, people are resisting, they are not willing to sacrifice their life. they, they will be, they economies day, you know, a livelihood, or even when it comes to a conflict between nato and russia, which is, god forbid, i hope, far away their lives. now i know that the tension between russia and nato for quite some time, and back in 2014. you wrote that for the sake of ukraine. the u on the united

states have to come to terms with russia having its legitimate national interest, just like any other country. russia has legitimate security interest, intent on protecting, and it sounds self evident. but yes, if we look at the last 7 years, be very persistent that i think very deliberate, rough efforts to sabotage any peace making in your graham. it's pretty clear that there was simply gathering that promise. what do you think is the current goal of western policy on the russian or on the ukrainian track was they would ideally like to achieve, or they're not specifying, they're just saying that you have to win. so we don't know what exactly this this, this, this, this when would look like. we know that for several times. and even henry kissinger said, perhaps ukraine should be, or president zelinski should be more realistic about the settlement

between a moscow and here. but if we see what is being done, you know, a constantly, a new weapons are being sent with the longer range. i'm not sure whether it will, you know, set up a lot of times. because if someone wants to achieve a diplomatic solution to the conflict which is already a volvic into a direct conflict between nato and, and russia. because we have to bear in mind that the moment that the republics in easton, ukraine are participating. referenda, which what president putting exclusively said, and it was also repeated by say, again, love a foreign minister, russia, a russian federation is that ones that those republic will join russia, that the country will use any means to, to protect them. i think that's

a very important point. then there are several of the factors that go into that decision making as far as the crime is concerned. but one of them is definitely a tactical military strategy because i, regardless of whether it was accept those referendums, the, the character of the war will change for russia in terms of its tactics, in terms of the me that it can use. and in terms of the means that it will employ you achieve its goals. now, do you think that will change the conduct as far as the conduct this conflict as far as the west is concerned? well, i would, i would like to change that it will change, but i'm not sure. because as i previously said, they, i mean we have to look up what they are doing and what they are saying. and it, even though the this month that there was a certain proposal called a key of defense document that was presented by the former

prime minister and foreign minister from the nato countries where they were proposing basically to here a fact. so nato a member. 1 so i think dis, referenda should have take place 8 years ago. in my opinion. i think the president may have put in a drop the ball when it comes to this referenda when the people were suffering. i mean, russian population of eastern europe. ukraine was something by den where they were harassed in queue, but apparently the human rights don't don't apply to russian citizens or russian population in this and you're going but there's a separate, separate topic. but you, you might be said that this is a technical maneuver because 1st and foremost, although everyone is trying to portray president but even put in as a madman,

i'm not sure whether he's a madman because he's a person who finished law. he's a lawyer and he has a ph. d in economics, so he's quite well, but with all, everything that happened in history has been many tensions did there in russia and the west before. but during the cold war, there were some mechanisms of sort of managing those tension, arm controls that you know, as far as to de escalate some back channel diplomacy. but we are not seeing anything at the moment, both sides as sort of going full speed towards the choosing the objectives. there are no negotiations, any efforts to come to the negotiating table between the russians and the ukrainians. that being to pito by, by the west, are there any safe guards law as far as you are concerned, concerns against an all out war against the 3rd world war? oh, well, they know, we know the united states withdrew from any agreement. you know,

the proliferation of weapons and nuclear treaties are concerned. so it's open a gate to nuclear change and i would say that western media and western politicians are misinterpreting. well, the russian government is saying it's not blackmailing, but it's just saying as well, perhaps mother would say to his child, don't you know, touch or hook up because you will get done. so it's not a threat is just the stating a fact. so, you know, there's a saying in geopolitics, that nuclear power never, it's never defeated. because the last, the rest of being pushed to the wall is using this nuclear weapons. otherwise we wouldn't have nuclear weapons. and i can assure that united states, if, if the country would have been pushed to, to, to, well, would do the same. because this is that the, the, the, the rational of having

a nuclear weapons. and we have to take a very short break right now. but we will be back in just a moment. ah ah, the me ah, welcome back to the park with andrea to london base political analyst and risk consulting edge rail. before the break, we were talking about the world covering on the and bringing over another global complex and the lack of any safeguards to prevent that. and you know what got me

really concerned the other day. i heard one well respected and very even tempered russian. emily school used to be very well received in the web. so just that, the only thing that can bring western decision makers back to reality would be a credible threat to that old countries, not to ukraine, not even to euro, because the american can care less about you are but a credible threat. you don't marry can mainland, this is not the person who is known for any war promoting statements. i wonder if, if you agree with that, and how concerning is that is concerning. because we know that america unfortunately has already sacrificed europe and its development. i mean, america has succeeded in the, in the us julys in europe. i mean,

what we think at the moment is the corpus of europe. we will have during the winter blackouts, they advising us to take a cold shower was, i mean, how ridiculous is that? so when it comes to your question about the credible threat, yes, i think until the united states will not find it. so gonna position that it can be realistically hom, bye bye bye. a russia it will push the country's to unplug a nice russia and move forward. with the threat because as i said, this is not a video game, it is real. people are dying on the ground as many american foreign policy makers and analysts are saying, america is willing to to fight the russian until the last few trains. so they are using ukraine, ukrainian, people today, geopolitical to achieve their jo, geopolitical objectives and they are using them as the common border that got them

the reasons the question of how that threat could be communicated to the united states with russia being a responsible member of the international community because having nuclear weapons settled the country with, with enormous responsibility, not only before the americans of the western residents before the rest of the world as well. but also defined as intro because they had the room for maneuver here is not too broad. i mean, that does that, does that mean to be honest, there's no reason to believe that because how, how many times you can communicate the, you quote, the certain country across a red line. how many red lines have to be crossed in all the for the other party to, you know, come to the conclusion that we have enough. i mean we, we poke the back and the base really angry and it can retaliate. so, you know, move a little bit back from the theory and

a fairy tales to the greek tragedy. and there was a concept of the x mark got from the machine. so when ever there was a story where there was unsold a problem, all of a sudden, you know, there was, i was, was, was appearing, and this problem was automatically sold. so in order to ask the question, i think that i don't know what would be that was in this particular case. but other than that, i don't see any other other me to, to communicate something which has been communicated, time and time again to the western partners of russia. i share your interest in greek literature and i'm sure where the re with me the ancient grief saw a hubert as of the main them and putting themselves into place of god was considered to be something that inevitably would bring ruin upon people or

forces that do that now i'm struggling as a russian who started in the united states. i have many friends there. i love the american and british culture, but i'm failing to understand what could possibly drive this kind of policy because it's one thing to dislike russia. but you cannot pretend that it doesn't exist and you cannot pretend that it's nuclear weapons don't exist. why do you think the west is? so i'm compromising in trying to not only punish russia, but to hold onto it. germany, which by all measures is not held up by the reality itself. well, i'm glad that you've mentioned that constant before brings, but we know that there will be no measures a rational consequence brings. and once someone is in this mentality, it doesn't pass the word as it is. so if you are delusional,

which is i can state by the fact that the, the blog of the policy makers in the united states in capitol hill diluted their risk, you know, immersed in, in who would be, they don't care. i mean, for them is achieved the gemini. so once you are in this load, i mean, how can you be, i mean, you got the entire world. how, how does that mean that, you know, if you will be exceptional country, you don't perceive other countries as an equal. they either comply with your so called rules based, although which should has nothing to do with the public international law. and trust me, i've, i've studied more and i'm a lawyer by, by profession. so there's no, no such a thing as the rules based order. but once you are exceptional country folks,

among many, you walk creating rules of they go and either countries comply or they are being punished. and russia said, no, we have our own national, legitimate interest. they've been trying, as we remember before the special ration or the complex break criminal will sending letters to have the mutual security agreement with the united states and not the countries, but they dismissed that they dismissed. bye bye bye. know he does. they are dealing with the nuclear power. so this, this entire company could easily a preventive, but it wasn't. and if it was done with intent, now let's you mentioned the rest of the world, and i think it's not just russia, but many other countries that i'm not ready to accept the western last order anymore, simply because it's unfair it's, it only balances the west and it ruins the planet and it doesn't even benefit the

western society of western people. it only benefits a very narrow group group of people who for some reason, once you add more trillions, to that trillions. do you think the, how do you think the rest of the world is reacting to what's happening? because if it seems to be hygiene is best for the time being. but deep down do you think. 6 countries would like to see more democratic governance when it comes to global affairs. of course, i mean i myself, i mean my mom is jewish, and my father is transactions. so i quite, i'm quite familiar with the global style voices and especially in africa. and as you probably know, recently the american ambassador to the united nations black lady, african american lady, said explicitly during her visit to africa, that there will be significant consequences if the african countries will deal with,

with russia. and this met with outrage. i have several conversations with people from gun, from, from, from, came out from, from the boss, from, from danya and people with outrages how united states can you know, whose countries and this goes back to let me give you an example. a famous president of gannon comic chroma iraq and famous book called the neo colonialism, the last stage of imperialism. and it was published roughly 965. so once this book was published, the united states department was outrageous. and they cancel out dramatically this . so called a to gunner, which was worth $25000000.00. so we have to understand that going back to your fed governments, governance on the world stage. the global want to participate in russia and china. communicating that the global government should be democratic

regardless whether the country is per se, according to the west standard as a demo receipt. but the global governance should be democratic, which means one country, one voice. so that's why we see there's a strong support for the global, seldom countries for russia. and it will be a strong support for, for russia and china as well. because there are a lot of grievances and people who in global out in africa in latin america. what the us seeing being now conducted these of the russian is the same treatment that they've been a day that they've been, you know, met with, from the west. well, all these years of colonial era can bring the legend one more time. because i think there's one on metaphor that is very, that are relevant here. and that's the metaphor of the round table. if you remember, it was marilyn the magician who gave the king that round table. and what was it

inscribed on that table was i think by helping each other we become equals initially that was supposed to be the rationale of the united nations. that all countries would see that around that round table. and that they will be able to settle that differences by mutual respect, by some minimal distance towards one another. understanding that they're doing that for the sake of the global piece. do you think that you out has lead up to that noble goal and what could be done to make that organization truly efficient? well this, i think unfortunately, i think of a high probability that the united nations will show the face of legal nations, which was this mental, it doesn't represent the global voice. i mean, the voice of the international community. it is a very, a now not only constructed voice of international community,

which is united states and it's colleagues and friends around the world. in asia, we have japan and how does predominant be in the western hemisphere. but unfortunately, united nation doesn't have tools to, you know, to somehow impose its will on the united states, which is the most powerful country in the world. we, what we can go back to the fact that unit had in the united states invaded iraq. even though the coffee and what's against this. so whenever we hear about the, you and charter, the russia should come, why would you in charge that we should, you know, ask i was so how many times united states has broken the you like the charter? you chop and so sorry. so, so this is double standards. i mean, you can't, you know, require from other countries to comply with you and chart the although they require,

but not applying the same rules and law seal. so this is what, what, what the united states is doing. we've been hearing about this multi polar world or more democratic governance for quite some time. but it's one thing to aspire to something, it's quite another thing you actually practices. do you see any signs around the world that the countries that actually ready to engage with one another on an equal footing that is being a generous front and the enemy to one another? i mean, we have to pay close attention. what is happening in different, you know, frame multilateral frameworks, like bricks, alike, shanghai, a, corporation, organization which are going to be the summit. and we can see that many countries are, you know, trying to, to, to move away from dollar and habit exchanges in the national currency. so these are

the size. people are afraid, we have to understand that it's not so easily that, i mean, it's not so easy to say to the edge. i'm on the, you know, look, i want to participate on equal footing with everyone around the globe. so people, you know, just hedging their best, because they don't know, in what way the united states, i mean the, you know, the, the declining edge, a mom will react. and once this icon of decline is that once you realize that you don't have any other way to, to suppress and make other people complain with your will. you are becoming very much aggressive and countries are afraid. but what we're seeing around the world is that, yes, there is a mutual consensus that the governors and the interactions between countries have to change. and hopefully the, you know, the, the change will be brought by the relationship between china and russia. otherwise,

i can see that we will just start in this multi follow unipolar world, where america is just costing other countries and you know, making life of other people miserable as well. it's been great talking to you. thank you very much for your time. thank you for having. thank you for watching. hooked. you theory again on the wall, depart. ah, me the versus me ah, ah.

a referendum in the dark mass republics and to break away regions of ukraine had ended with all 4 voting to join russia. video evidence emerges, showing what's been described as an unprecedented damage to the more dream pipeline system with german media, claiming possible sabotage. also ahead just to just mean the situation has not changed. it's a complete sham from western countries. russian president vladimir, who says the west of broken promises free printing and brain to go to countries and need as only a small.