you want the fondest the little she my new. i know. i know i isn't all 7 long, but you know, put them out to give us the in the headlines when off you international, at least one civilian is killed and 3 others wounded off the residential areas. of don't yet come under ukrainian shelling all of this as president putin worn to hear the tax on the new regions of russia woke go unpunished. also germany seeks alternative energy suppliers that a winter approaches going as far as to reverse bias on a weapons sales to saudi arabia of the previously implicating the middle east and country and the quote monstrous killing of a journalist and a 2nd military coup this year in kena 5, so rocks,

the west african nations coming as the country is already suffering from a spring of deadly terrorists. the pushing back on the mainstream narrative to thought into national life from moscow . so glad you can join us. but this was program. now residential areas in don. yeah, it's kind of again come under intense artillery fire by ukrainian forces, at least one civilian killed, 3 wounded, sold according to local authorities. i should warn you quickly in advance. now there are some pretty troubling images coming your way. at the following footage, showing the moments off to a residential building was struck. a man reportedly died from shrapnel wounds and local officials claim. the key of forces had fight specifically at that neighbourhood. and here at t, as we understand at least one school was also damaged in the attack. now saying,

don't ask republic of the russian ministry of defense that it has now withdrawn. a troops from the city of leman to avoid being encircled by ukrainian troops in the area as care apparently has a much larger contingent, right. the, despite key of advance of the russian ministry of defense claims ukraine has been suffering heavy losses. $200.00 troops killed in the last 24 hours while 5 tanks and 9 the combat vehicles were also destroyed. now of course, all of us come shortly after president putin urged kia to stop all hostilities in the region. he made that statement during a speech welcoming the accession of for new territories, including dawn, gets into that of the russian federation. who i am, please get, is you need, we call on the key of regime to immediately cease fire all hostilities the war it on lease back in 2014 and returned to the negotiating table were ready for this is been said more than once, but we will not discuss the choice of the people and against dynette. he is on and zap rogia,

it's done. russia will not betray them. celebrations erupted off the documents, were signed up to look at his pictures right here. the night sky lit up emitter, one of the fireworks displays and the dynamic republic in as f rogers biggest city millet topple people, reacted putin's announcement with cheers while in her san residence took to the streets. although not too long due to were lingering security concerns. but in case you missed it aeronautics international, we had the coverage just just less than 24 hours ago. the biggest event was held in central moscow. the heart of the iconic reads that lot of effort and addressed the crowd right there together with leaders, all the new regions with rallies and concerts held all throughout russia in support of the re unification. well, the thousands of people might at the streets to celebrate that you can see all the

pictures here, waving national flags. you can see more of those videos right now. if you like at r t dot com my see what that will. meanwhile, a key evans, several of its own western allies, have condemned the accession. you as president biden has said that washington would not recognize the new boarders, and promised to provide more aid to ukraine. the u commission, chief ursula van de leon, she said, the move by russia quote won't change anything. and the you case new prime minister las truss promised to ensure that russia would lose what she called an illegal war . or in response, the russian president vladimir putin really guess i'm with strategic security agreements, fly into the trash or we here is the west defends in order based on rules. where did these rules come from? who's ever seen these rules, solid deception, double already triple standards? it's easy to count on fools. russia is a 1000 year old civilization and it will not live by such false rules. the west uses suppression, exploitation, and enslavement instead of democracy. the unipolar,

well that is built is anti democratic, deceitful and hypocritical through and through. but will be held from a former pentagon security i've list, michael mal of he says, the world order is in up here, ukraine was only the instigator. it's been building for quite for many, many years. the u. s. has envision itself as the us lead unipolar world order. and now we're seeing a multi polar world or re merging. and, and part of that is to continue for the united states to contain its so called enemies and, and if adversaries. and this is the way to do it. and, but, but what's happened is that the united states is, is, is we can do have and other countries beginning to say we've had enough of this. and they're, they're reacting as a consequence. we're, we're already seeing countries wanting to join the bricks,

countries. they want to join the shanghai cooperation organization. these are all your asian oriented groups that both moscow and beijing or heading. and it's creating an interesting dilemma here and major changes that we're seeing in the world or letter address. some news just in here at auto international coming from the crimean peninsula is where as we understand a military plane report, the court fire while coming in to land in the city of sever stapo. and the following unverified video is believed to show clouds of smoke coming from a military air base just north of self estoppel. the regions governor says the plane caught fire as it landed and the celebrated down the runway. now some eye witnesses report hearing a number of explosions and local officials claim some of the ammunition on board.

the aircraft may have detonated a fight, as i said, to have brought the situation now under control. so early on friday, ukraine demanded fast track membership to nato just hours off and making that request the allies, his chief didn't appear all of a sudden, quite so accommodating. jordan greener the fact. so we have already made our way to nato to day ukraine is applying to do. did you read were taken out. the findings tab by signing ukraine supplications will fast track, accession tomatoes in this. cecil membership, of course, has to be taken by all 3rd allies and we take these decisions. boy consensus. all refocus now is all providing an immediate support to ukraine and to help you can defend itself against the russian brutal invasion. now we discussed this with

a political scientist mug. slow bowed up. he says, you creighton shouldn't hang its hopes on being brought into the military alliance . i do not believe that it is on the table for ukraine to be brought into nato at the point because there's too much disagreement within nato. certainly, hungary, but several other countries as well. certainly are not willing to bring you crane in when that would automatically at this point preclude direct military conflict with russia. nato is of course, completely a political organization, a, a platform for the u. s. global military hedge mon 2 project power around the world . it, it serves both as a physical platform, any political, fig leaf of multilateralism. that's, that's what it does. the impromptu, i mean, rather quite unexpected nato press conference. it did come on the heels of our russia beginning the process for the new territories to join the country. nato's

secretary general fully rejected that move, saying that accepting the new status would be consenting to what he called nuclear blackmail. this is against open book state, that while the alliance is focusing on, supporting key of nato has no intention of being dragged into a direct wall. there's also risk of escalation beyond ukraine evolving old. and it's alice. are we all to be medically on us? needless not talking to the conflict, we support ukraine, but that doesn't make us pointed to the conflict. they're trying to wash their hands off what, what they've been doing. of course, their party to the conflict. they've been sending arms. they've been depleting their own stocks in order to send arms to ukraine. course their party to the conflict. but you know, they want to, like they want to just kind of weasel out on through legalese talk saying, well, we haven't declared war on russia. we're not in war, russia, but in fact,

they aren't war with russia. they're sending all sorts of arms to ukraine that are killing people that are killing russians that have killing ukrainians that don't want to live under the key regime. so nato is a party to the war, but, you know, now they're a little bit worried, because russia may just dispense with the niceties and just say, well, yeah, you are new to the war, whatever. no matter what you say. so i think, you know, sold timber wasn't, wasn't acting, he is truly jittery. he's truly nervous. and all those, you know, his real losses, of course, in washington. obviously didn't give in good enough instructions because they don't know what to do now either because they're not really anxious to flight russia. so it seems that the season of demonstrations is just getting warmed up. protestors have gathered on the streets of berlin, demanding an end to both shipments of nato weapons to ukraine,

and that of the war itself. a 100 to send it on the german capital waving peace flags, and calling for the tax payer's money being sent abroad to ukraine. to be brought back home, demonstrators also want to old side to negotiate and for the conflict. meanwhile, germany's nato ally, the u. s. signed one of the largest packages of military and economic gates ukraine . this time for $12000000000.00 for quote, immediate security assistance. that is, despite what appears to be growing the domestic opposition to such huge sums of money being sent overseas. the legislation narrowly pass off to being opposed by almost half of congress ukrainian military will get around a quarter of the funding. while another $2000000000.00 is to be used to replenish depleted stockpiles of weapons that washington previously sent to key f. another portion of all the money will go to america's military mission in europe. and some

u. s. allies in the meantime has taken rather a different approach to that of washington bulgaria, as an example has actually rejected at least one request by kia. the ukranian ambassador had requested heavy weapons from us, but my answer to that was clear. there is a decision of the parliament on the rendering of military technical assistance, but not on the provision of weapons. as long as i am occupying my post arms won't be provided to ukraine and while the german but this dog has overwhelmingly rejected the plan of a right wing political block which demanded the tfc. send on that personnel carriers and tanks promptly and in substantial quantities the countries on stocks have been used extensively to supply ukraine. ultimately leading to the point where berlin has said it has reached the limit. but apparently the ukraine shouldn't count on lethal a being sent. that's according to media report, citing a senior european official who says any significant growth in supplies is

improbable, stockpiles among western allies have nearly been wiped out. in here at archie, we spoke with political and financial analyst, angelo juliano, who says that deliveries of alms the ukraine is just not the only issue at stake. what we need is not only the weapons being for us, but you keep in mind that actually ukraine will be exporting nancy ideology into you up. this is the key bone. it is similar to what ice is, did you have a less the movement that he, that has been supported by the, with the queen and you have millions of your queen is know how many of them off nancy, and how much these ideology spread all over europe. i do think that europeans and americans, they do not care about you clean them lives. what they want is to destroy russia.

that was always the plan. so, so when it comes to weapons, you know, did you up is getting so much didn't interest, you know, because the depleting the resources that it's getting dangerous, you know, they don't have enough weapons right now to protect themself in case of war, in an effort to contain skyrocketing energy bills in the e. u of france and germany reportedly backing a pan european platform for gas purchases. a berlin has already been strengthening ties with saudi arabia, including reversing it's bad on a weapons exports to re add to reportedly trying to obtain cheaper fuel commodities . let's get some opinion now. here's the take of artie contributor rachel marston. what's the deal with western nations publicly saddlin up on their moral high horses and looking down their noses at some countries while more discreetly driving economic benefit from those same countries or at least attempting to russia is the

obvious example here with the e. u. constantly bag, melting and sanctioning moscow on one hand, while demanding that it continue to provide it with energy on the other. well, at least until it can wean itself off of the dirty authoritarian gas molecules. and now 4 years after former chancellor angular merkel stopped german weapon sales to saudi arabia citing the kingdoms involvement in the murder and dismemberment with a bone salve. washington post columnist and saudi activist jamal cash o g. inside the saudi consul. in this stumble, while it looks like berlin has had a change of heart, the german government has once again, green lit new arms exports to saudi arabia, including about $36000000.00 euros worth of ammunition for fighter jets. it's surely just a coincidence that german chancellor, olaf schultz wrapped up his middle eastern door knocking, got gas tour,

which included a visit with saudi crown. prince mohammed been sal man. so what were the conditions supposed to be for resumption of weapons sales from germany to saudi arabia? so look at the monstrosity that happened that the saudi arabian consulate and turkey that has to be cleared up and so long as it's not explained, there will be no arms exports to thaw there a bit. i assure you of that explicitly. even those deals that were already approved cannot happen now, as long as the case has not been resolved. and as long as there have been no substantial consequences in riyadh, we would completely lose our credibility. it looks like everything around the cache o g issue has just magically cleared up. now, where did all that moral outrage go? all of a sudden? well, all that's a minor detail, i guess when berlin hasn't stopped making profits from weapon sales, egypt and the u. e. which are also part of the saudi, like co listen in the yemen war against the iranian backed anthea that was overwhelmingly condemned in a resolution passed by the european parliament last year as the quote world's worst

humanitarian crisis. but germany needs fuel and the saudis need wides. so they both need you and me to get a sudden case of really bad amnesia and forget that everything else happened previously. now by him was also intent at one point on making saudi arabia, korea. it looks like he's making about as much progress on that front as he is at mastering the stairs. ah, since that are on nuclear deal hasn't really turned out the way that biden had hoped. and the u. s. is running low on oil reserves. the saudis have been miraculously rehabilitated. these are the moral authorities dictating how the average western citizen must suffer financially and sacrifice for whatever values that the elite evoke at any given time. but they clearly have no qualms changing those values whenever it suits them. a military coup and power

change has happened in burkina faso for the 2nd time this year. it was mocked by explosions and shootings around the presidential palace and capital y. google or fridays overthrow was announced by army officers. they did so by seizing a national tv channel, the pretty book, enough of the people of burkina faso since the 24th of january 2022. i have been faced with a continually deteriorating security situation. and we, the officers of the national armed forces were motivated to take action with a desire to protect the security and integrity of our territory. president amoeba is fired is no longer president of can a fossil and venue please. the name is captain abraham towel. gay is the 2nd call in it month. people are not allowed to go out because it is, it costs you only to what they said in via integral a speech. it's due to the fact that her present that me by didn't take care.

elsie's commitment, when he came, the new group believed that the dunbar was love. this kind of a good guy and he was not good. also in the management of it talks, i didn't have enough weapons, they don't have enough money to fight them. he ramos geneva has shown us his limits to me were betrayed the people, the people were hoping for real change. but on the diplomatic level, during a period of crisis, our diplomacy was very passive rather than active. l. last but not least, a monday or a convoy of 200 sites was attacked by to his group. and people say that it on 70 a civilian were killed and eaten meters, military is kill us move. we say that france is in collusion with the terrorists. if in reality, france, which colonized us really wanted to in this crisis, it could have ended it. the assault we just heard about was on

a cotton void of some 200. lori's taking supplies to a northern part of the west african country earlier in the week, but such as the most terror toxic i'm rather common in, but if in a fast, so if in 2015, we understand thousands of people killed and nearly 2000000 displaced from their homes now a book in abi security consulting, we talked to says that political dialogue, something severely lacking over the years, is really needed to reduce the violence and the reach. for the moment it is difficult to determine which group is responsible for the terrorist attack. what is absolutely clear is that some group committed atrocities on local people. we know only that this area is in full control of terrorist groups, but such methods are synonymous with actions of islamic states. therefore, it is too early to assert which organisation actually did the terrorist attack. we need to wait for further information. the fact that the government is taking important steps to fight terrorism is very important because political dialogue

might lower the level of violence in the region. we cannot say that the level of terrorist attacks increased after france withdrew its forces from the country because france was never actually present in this region. france certainly provided targeted supportive burkina faso. but our country still continues to call on france to pay more attention to the bar cane operation. the most positive thing is that the government is really engaged in dialog dialog which may reduce the level of violence without the government itself resorting to violence. additionally, the emergence of peoples brigades that provide security and their being allowed to combine and direct the efforts of self defense groups as a good development. the worst thing that we have to admit now is the understanding that the countries army cannot protect its population. and that common people are suffering from the endless violence following a backlash on social media. the new york times article has removed the reference to britain's colonial hand and building quote, democracy in india over 250 years. now. it's not the 1st time some western outlets

of applied, what's been labeled colonial language when covering india, for example. so let's send that over now to our correspondent. here's ortiz, arrangement sharma, is the worst media taking to march liberty when it comes to india. india for long has been complaining about the coverage that it gets in the western dress from the controversial time magazine gobble calling prime minister during the movie. a divider in chief to recent new york times article that said it to britain to 50 years to build a democracy in india, which used a far more needed diplomat observation of indian democracy. you can't impose your values, you have to accommodate them to the values of the country. it took britain, 250 years to build a democracy in india and we had 20. the court imply the 200 years of british repression cultivated egless. terry and values in india weeps,

wat when britain came to india, we were 28 percent of the world g d p. when they left us we were down to 3 percent . so they, in a sense, looted us exploited us and enriched themselves if that, to someone's ideal all for infusing values and democratic norms that i'm not quite sure if they understand what the democracy is all about. but it's not unusual for western media to look down upon rest of the world. and india is no exception. i guess this is white man's burden where they're paying that dad or dean right to discipline and democratize societies which needs the handholding and infusion of values as a comment. and then righty, article also seems to suggest, but i guess they must realize the world has moved on after receiving backlash. the new york times remove the reference of britain's colonialism and building democracy in india. but the court was already shared on twitter. back on the g saltisha

director will enrich now. and liter retreated by the son of india external f as minister do j shanker. this quote almost made me lose my lunch. you can't impose your values, you have to accommodate them to the values of the country. it took britain, 250 years to build democracy in india. hi, it appears the new york times has now abbreviated that quote. and this is not the 1st time the new york times has painted colonial gallows all over its indian coverage in 2014. after the big launch of miles orbital mission. it published a garden featuring an indian man wearing a line cloth and dragging the cow. why knocking on the door of the leak press club with white men reading newspapers inside the newspaper. apologize them and now again, how often do you hear people talking about it or pronouncing it in fact, look at the media coverage. what does the media cover?

what does the media not cover? not cindy, all the external affairs minister in washington dropping to bombs on the american press on the policy makers getting the message across loud and clear. you know, what united kingdom actually was a better country. they had rob rob, indian premiums. they had left the country with the 3 d, b from 27, the global g d b, which was bought from that they had the system, the market. so they basically left the can be broken and devastated. but given the town wanted to follow like this i think so this is basically what new york time as a lot of you don't need to be talking about building democracy in the country, etc. and the nation that does not agree to the liberal democracy lane is

a problem. and they're ready to go to any extent of the country. they're ready to go to any extent to damage the reputation. but one of the thing about this whole thing is that now as i say that been social media, we have a lot of a lot of people. so earlier on, people that finally depend on washington, all sort of new york times, their numbers are reducing. so we've got all that is coming out and a lot of that will be in the west. the media has always been the propaganda or of the watch. and the lobby is politicians policy because in the dual credit to profit these morchinson bankers, then it just got it from them. so they don't really have a choice. could that be with us for the program? now hundreds of iraqis gathered in baghdad. central teddy are square to celebrate the anniversary of anti government protests that broke out in 2019 and made an

ongoing political deadlock in the country demonstrate his way of national flags and demand as a government sold economic crisis, unemployment and other various issues. a local security officers were out in force blocking a number of streets in baghdad and fear gas was fired when protest. i started throwing stones authorities, also claiming some demonstrators through fire bombs unused hunting rifles. more than 17 people reportedly injured in the classes. the us ambassador to sudan has warned the country over its military cooperation with russia. that is, despite our president biden telling the un general assembly last week, the washington doesn't pose any ultimatums to other nations. we do not ask any nation to choose between the united states or any other partner. we do not ask any nation to choose between the united states or any other partner. meanwhile,

the us ambassador, sudan, seems to be going against the tide. as the 1st american diplomat appointed about position in 25 years, it was rather concerned about sudan strengthening its ties with russia. all countries have a sovereign right to decide which other countries to partner with, but these choices have consequences. of course, if the sudanese government moves forward with the agreement with russia to establish a naval base or to renegotiate about it, it would be detrimental to the interests of sudan, apparently lacking experience, as well as thoughtlessly repeating washington's on diplomatic approaches. john godfrey, like his predecessors, is trying to speak to the sudanese people in the language of threats and ultimatums regarding cartoons implementation of its sovereign foreign policy. his arguments concerning the modern world order look absurd. we discussed the story with a political analyst at mickey, elbow grabby who says suzanne wants to make its own decisions without having to consult outside plans. the unit was optimistic,

that a and then a b i. then they can say that they do with it is not something wrong that has the right religion with china, with all and what is going on is that there is improvement. but then proven, is modeled by the battery in for more than to get on was the case and the sand now is little. i'll just tell it. but the problem again, united is many. so many people, if they don't follow the recipe for relation,

there will bring them back to you again as a phrase it, when you have an african can be affected by your action. and when you have russia on the other side, i see now the sanction might or might be able to get that. i think i said that united states should not blame russia lives are they get they should live or that if and out here from moscow without the international rescue the program just for this hour. it's about a half step and saturday night here in the russian capital. thanks for sharing your time with us here. we'll be back soon with a .