ah, i'm, i'm with, these are the kind of fun shell fragments that we found here. there is a city named chatsworth, california usa, our correspondence finds what appears to be part of westerns, applied munitions in a city where local authorities say, a boarding school and bus station, or shell by ukrainian force it archie. when's a legal battle against google as a russian court rules, the u. s. tech giant loss for access to the network to plot youtube channel. and moscow says nuclear conflict is unacceptable. i'm in western media hysteria

over russia, potential use of atomic weapons. we discussed the issue with our dat there we have to have the boogeyman, they always have to have an if the central thread, it's clear to me that this is hyped of rhetoric. russia has always been a very responsible here because united states that walked out on the mtv and mtv, with, from las go to the world. this is our t international. i'm rachel blevins. and these are the top stories. this our we began the, our, with the latest from the ground and the russia, ukraine. conflict or alert sirens have been heard in the city of know, via coca in her song region. local authorities say about 15 explosions were heard. partial mobilization continues and russia around $200000.00 have joined the armed

forces so far. 1 according to the country's defense minister, thus, as russian forces hit ukrainian positions and the north of the darnedest republic, with more than a 100 ukrainian troops killed and 14 pieces of military hardware distort, dannetta authorities, se ukrainian forces shall the city of dough chavez, using western supply munitions, including i. mars rockets, artes roman coaster up reports from the scene. a ukrainian nationalist forces attack the city of zachary shyest. very early in the morning. at least 5155 millimeter shells, landed at this insert city bus station. thankfully, it was closed at that time. that means there were no people around here. if that, that happened a bit later, that could have been many, many victims. mm

mm. mm mm. mm. mm. something who do use people to part from the space station heading towards danielle, or vulnerable. huh. the schedule here is tight. a bus to parts almost every hour. usually there are lots of people. if it had happened during the rush hour, there would have been victims. it's horrible using as it since a hold of the these are the kind of a shell fragments that we found i here and i actually found it sag away from here. and clearly it's marked in english. and there's a q r code. there is a city named chatsworth, california usa, now local authorities are saying that the city was attacked by

nato made shells. this city is not that far away from the front line at least 15 to 20 kilometers. however, this place where we are, there are absolutely no ministry positions. there's a boarding school right over there, the europe with us, i am a school employee and our school has also been damaged with the windows having been shattered. we arrive there early in the morning. thank god, nobody suffered though we shall precisely, with no restraint. it's not for the 1st time earlier, 2 buildings and electrical plant was shelled. as i wanted to get a job that there are no military facilities over there. this can only mean that he crenan nationalist, continue to terrorize civilians continue to spread panic among the local population over the last 24 hour period. at least 2 people were

injured. boy, ukrainian, shelly romano, cauthrin r t done as people's republic. the director general visit pro, she nuclear power plant has been sacked and deported ukrainian home territory. in footage shown on russian television, he admitted to sending information about the plant to ukrainian security services. acknowledging that key ab was likely to shall this facility. so with his book, i was in touch with the security service of ukraine agent on whatsapp. i gave him information about the situation at the plant. the damage to the plant could lead to an emergency. the shilling most likely came from the ukrainian side. the personnel were and still are in danger while restoring the plant after the showing the a confirmed, the former director is now in ukraine controlled territory. it comes as the director general of the agency is set to visit both kiev and moscow to discuss the

situation at the plant. the facility is controlled by russia and has come under repeated shelling with mosque out blaming the ukrainian army for the attacks kiev. it denies the allegations and claims that it is russia which is targeting the plant he ev is ready to hand over control of its intended russian targets to the united states and exchange for a new batch of long range rocket systems. according to a c n n report, ukraine is trying to overcome the biden administration's resistance to providing army tactical missile systems, rockets, they can reach targets at around 300 kilometers. that's nearly 4 times the range of the americans applied high mars rocket system. while washington claims it doesn't want to escalate the conflict and ukraine, u. s. secretary of state antony blanket says key. i can use western weapons to

target the for regents, which voted overwhelmingly to join the russian federation. ukraine has the absolute right to defend itself throughout its territory, including to take back the church where we that has been illegally seized one way or another. i wrote less cross live now to scott ritter, a former us marine corps intelligence officer. scott, it's great to have you on the program today. now cnn reports that ukraine is ready to give washington full target control in exchange for a longer range missiles, but isn't p have already using military data provided by the u. s. what is the difference in the latest offer? this is pure political mumbo jumbo. united states already controls how you train a uses weapons such as the high mars system. we also. ready control

a much of the fire support provided by nato artillery systems that have been turned over to the ukraine. so the, the, the notion that there's going to be a qualitative change where you create is going to suddenly say, here, we're going to allow you to tell us what to do and how to do it. we're already doing that. so this is, this is absurd and then just keep in mind with lincoln said, you know, ukraine saying that we're going to give the united states the ability to control the targets of blinking. the said that the united states will allow ukraine to strike targets in the territories that are now constitutionally part of russia. i don't see the united states doing this. this is, this is trickery that even the united states realizes, will lead to nothing more than an escalation of a conflict, both united states and they don't make clear. they don't want escalate. yeah,

now given the weapons and supplies that the u. s. has already been giving to yeah, i mean, ukrainian troops have showed residential areas and crucial civil and infrastructure allegedly using those us applied high mars missiles. so what is your take on that, and is the us showing at all here that it's concerned about that civilian infrastructure, or is it more so just showing that it isn't quite ready to escalate that conflict directly with russia? well, i think it's, it's, look, the u. s. is clear that they don't want to escalate to. they don't want to turn this into a direct conflict between nato and russia. on the other hand, the united states has shown an absolute disregard for the strikes that ukraine has been doing a regular and ongoing basis against civilian targets, purely civilian targets. it says if the united states is bought into

a ukrainian strategy, punishing the civilian populations of a, you know, territories that are now part of russia previously been occupied by russia to punish russian populations, punish people who are align themselves with russia. this is a war cry, plain simple in the united states is not only turning a blind eye to these ongoing crimes against international humanitarian law. but the united states is actively facilitating this by providing intelligence information about the locations of targets. and in many cases, coordinating the actual use of the weapons against civilian targets. so this is not just arrogance. this is criminal of behavior on the part of the united states. yeah, the u. s. wants to act like it's not involved on one hand. and then on the other hand, to brag about how involved it is. now you mentioned those 4 regions that are now

constitutionally a part of russia. so what do you make of blank and statements where he's saying that it's all fine and good? if you train continues to use those us supplied weapons to target those regions, then what well, i mean the united states and indeed are europe have put themselves in the box themselves into a corner, so to speak, by saying that they will not recognize of these newly acquired territories. they therefore must treat them as if their ukrainian sovereign territory, which means logically, they can't deny ukraine the ability to attempt to recapture them. so that's why you have a blank and making the statements it is making. but the reality is, of the united states doesn't want to further

a conflict between nato and russia. so there's rhetoric and then there's actions. we've seen the united states say for instance, they're not going to support the fast track. you know, they don't membership for nato. you see other nations, like germany say we're not going to provide or heavy weaponry. i think you're gonna start to see nato back tracking in terms of the practicalities of their assistance while they continue to use very heated rhetoric. that reflects no the, the political posturing that they have, that they will never recognize your russian sovereignty over these acquired turtles . certainly a lot at stake. their former us marine corps intelligence officer. scott ritter. thank you so much for your time and inside the trim ah, an arbitration court and moscow has ruled in favor of a claim large my r t against ghoul to restore access to 27 of its channels currently blocked on

youtube, the head of ortiz, legal team, gave us an account of the case which she does a unique victory to listen to. we went to court since our t channels on youtube had been blocked. and we were convinced that the band violated our rights for the freedom of distributing information. not only the ones we have as a media outlet, but also us citizens and a legal entity. such rights are granted by the russian constitution. we had previously signed an agreement with google on placing our content on their platform . so we were supposed to distribute the content without any obstacles. we didn't violate any of the youtube rules, but still our channels got banned. naturally, we as a media outlet emphasize the fact that the ban as we see it was a censorship move against our coverage. our point of view, particularly when it came to the ukraine crisis, the timing of the band coincided with the escalation. i view this as a unique case,

since we are the 1st to have one in court among the media, dr. channels band for censorship reasons. we see it as a precedent and hope this will help our colleagues and us to provide information without any more censorship. on google side. it is a vital decision and a very important precedent, not only for the practice of russian law, but also for the practice of international law. it's absolutely a big way for our team. because for example, according to the verdict, google has to unblock all 27 channels belonging to r t c, or face of 5. and that find amounts to a $100000.00 roubles per day. and if it doesn't do that, then that amount increases every week. so it doubles per day and every week that will increase and but of course they have 30 days to appeal as with any case. so we will see if they do that. but this isn't the 1st time this all sorted back in march,

basically after russia special military operation and ukraine and the you to block several channels belonging to russian accounts. and the reason that i did that, of course, was because it was trying to lies the voices coming from within russia. anything to do with the rotten angle or why it was happening, and what was happening exactly. so you to bid in one that's viewers to hear that side of the story, something that we've seen before. so of course it blocked it and then we had about 15 to 20 russian meter organizations that filed the lawsuit. and a, one of them, the 1st one being a grad and that actually in march that channel one, the lawsuit, and google was ordered to pay 1000000000 roubles in compensation. so now google has a 30 days to appeal that decision. not only russian state media or affiliated channels that were bad, we also had russian entertainment channels of banned from the use of across europe . i should ads. so it was really

a case of you to go mad. they just didn't want to hear any voices coming from within russia, even if it was a comedy show. so it's happened before it's happening again. so no doubt we will see it happening again in the future. if you to see that there's something there that doesn't fit with their agenda and their agenda is pretty much similar to the western narrative, the western agenda. so whenever they hear something that doesn't suit their narrative, they saw a block in it. and they all they have to say is that doesn't fit within our community guidelines, or you're spreading misinformation that don't even have to explain themselves. and like i said, in the case of the process, we even had entertainment channels blog which they don't mention politics or anything of that kind. initiating a nuclear war is unacceptable. that's a message from russia foreign ministry. it comes amid increasing alarm in the western media over what they fear isn't atomic weapons threat posed by moscow with

some reports, claiming that russia is preparing some sort of nuclear readiness test. amid the conflict in ukraine, comparisons to the cuban missile crisis have even been made. the consensus in washington is that we are closer to the use of nuclear weapons than at any time since the cuban missile crisis 60 years ago. and over what, over, who governs and rules? not even ukraine, but the don bass. over the past weeks, there have been a number of warnings coming from the u. s. including from current and former directors of the cia who accused moscow of reckless rhetoric when it comes to the use of nuclear arms, while claiming nato will respond accordingly. us national security advisor, jim sullivan warned that russia would face catastrophic consequences. this comes after president pollutants said he wasn't bluffing about a possible nuclear weapons response if russian territory is threatened. meanwhile,

on tuesday, the kremlin spokesperson said that russia wouldn't take any part in the current nuclear rhetoric being pushed by the west. my colleague, worry sushi discussed the west narrative over the nuclear threat with a panel of guest. this is part of a campaign propaganda campaign to smear russia. all of these experts in the west and governments which are a few in ukraine with finance, with, with weapons, with all this has since the 2014, not since the beginning of the year since 2014 knew that russia was a nuclear power. they knew that if they were going to start a war ended on best next to a nuclear power, there would be risks one day that begin to wake up this nuclear power, which is russia. i think this is again, part of the western scare mongering campaign where everything coming out of russia has to be. despair has to be threats. has to be scary to some extent. how relevant

michael, other comparisons right now, being made to that of the cuban missile crisis of $962.00 when it comes to the, the current tension around ukraine. i mean, are there real grounds for fear, or is it just part of the record? no i, it's clear to me that this is hyped of rhetoric. it's looking for ways to incite a more support around the ukraine. and, and i think that trying to have scare tactics of this nature with nuclear weapons coming emanating from the west and not from and not from russia. i think moscow strategy is, is not going to be trying to launch a tactical nuclear weapons. there's no need, i think what the, what russia will do is hold the areas that it has that and, and in fact, that have voted to join the federation and maintain them. we've certainly be hearing from, from the white house. they've been saying that there's been all sorts of back

channel messages going between the white house in the cabinet, in the white house warning the kremlin, you must not use nukes, and there will be di, catastrophic consequences from washington. if you do unwell over to you, the russian president has earlier stressed that russia would use all means available if was any threat to its territory. so any talk of nuclear arms use, it essentially is in the terms of defense at this point. but the west apparently is not convinced by russia has its nuclear doctrine, which we know what other u. s. what us problems us china with nothing new. i think when president baldwin said he's not bluffing for president bygone felt that it was embedded to on the spot to use equally strong language. and therefore he won a strong concert granted about this is a negative lead. russia is not going to use them. as i said, rush, i have always innovative, responsible nuclear,

all of it. but is it meeting in any effort or do you solve one clause to stop one? stop who it is united states and walk out of the a, b i. and that would be open skies. and russia always fear that the united states was developing a 1st like realty. russia has not a back to any united states or any european country that is that the military operation looking. but how ami ukraine is a defensive war for a guy doesn't make any sense. given the c, i director the u. s. defense secretary, they, they actually admitted there's no evidence of an imminent nuclear threat from moscow to ukraine. but what we're noticing is, is that the news articles, the press agencies, they don't report that they report fear, fear a nuclear armageddon. why is that the case? for several reasons? first of all, this is the way the u. s. is always a waged,

it's wars. they always have to have a bogeyman and they always have to have an existential threat. they always have to have something which is going to destroy the earth or destroy the the order. this is a weapon. busy massive distraction, we're, we're making people in the west believe that in the russia there is some sort of crazy tire, wants to eat up ukraine and this for the rest of the world. if journalists were to say, no, there's not really true. and his job would be at risk with mythics truly important . that real john, it do the job be created to go out there and spread the truth. because at the end we just want peace investigations into the north stream. pipelines damage are being hindered by danish and swedish restrictions. according to its operator, the delays come after powerful underwater explosions last week with both european and russian authorities hinting at possible sabotage. no extreme mac is unable to inspect the damage sections of the gas pipeline due to the lack of previously

requested necessary permits. according to the swedish authorities a ban on shipping, anchoring diving using of underwater vehicles. geophysical mapping has been introduced to conduct a state investigation around the damage sites in the baltic sea. the operator also said that a vessel which has the necessary equipment for the survey can not start work because of restrictions imposed by norway. pressure in the affected lines is said to have stabilized. meanwhile, sweden has a diving vessel to the site to prove the incident that has exacerbated europe's energy crisis. 3 separate leaks were recorded off the coast of denmark and sweden, a few dozen kilometers apart. the pipelines which were full of gas are said to be unusable due to the damage us secretary of state. anthony blinked in that attacking russian pipelines was in no one's interest. washington has

a track record of charging the energy infrastructure of some countries. one of those was nicaragua, which base severe consequences back in the 1980s when us back gorilla attack the countries oil facilities no no no. also curious why sabotaged in under water pipeline at the crudo receiving terminal at 1st sunday. you know, that handles more than 3 quarters of nicaragua, petroleum impulse. mister ortega said commandos of terror from the ca succeeded early this morning and damaging the oil pipeline and porto sandino.

joining us live now to go further in jobs on this is radio host. kerry harrison kerry, it's great to have you on the program today. now we know that washington funded the contrast in nicaragua and the 1980s to de stabilize the nation's government. do you think the u. s. continues to use proxy forces in a similar way today? it's quite possible though, we don't actually have firm evidence, and i would also add that pretty much every country does whatever they can to frustrate anybody else's lead over them. whether it's china, the united states, whether it's russia, people seem to not care when they're at the top, and they run things those about down here, little upright mammals. we get concerned about this stuff because it affects our lives. absolutely. one of those prices start skyrocketing that certainly affects the general public, much more than the politicians and office. now russia, security council has hinted that there are similarities between the washington

sponsored attack back in 1983, which targeted nicaragua, oil facilities, and the events of today. what you think he meant and are such comparisons fair? they're given everything we know so far. well, you know, if we just look at the facts, we do recall that under secretary of state, victoria newland did say back in january, february including president biden, that if the russians were to invade ukraine than in fact there would be no more nor stream to. and now as of today, there is no more nor stream to asked by a reporter at the time, including covered by spiegel in germany at deutsch avella. how are you going to do that? and a president biden said, we'll just do it. so was this pre cognition was this wishful thinking? it's turned into a reality. so it's hard to separate the united states entirely from

monkey shots, let's say. now there seems to be a little bit of back and forth over who could possibly benefit from the damage that was done to the north stream pipelines. yet we hear from the by an administration saying that no one would benefit from sabotaging north stream. do you see that thus true, especially given everything that we have heard from the same administration so far in regards to the pipeline? well, actually, everyone benefits from the damage of every pipeline, except again, us the people down here, the owners benefit prices go up. anybody who's got natural gas, who's fracking, who's doing shale busting to get more natural gas? who sending it overseas? transporting it. everyone gets a price hike. so the people at the top that run these operations doesn't matter what country they're in, they get to jockey back and forth, the higher the competition, the higher the prices, this benefits every country,

except of course, the consumer. it always gets back to us down here, and the people up top may scream and yell, but it's a bad deal. but it's a great deal if you're the only one that has the ice cream stand in the town in the middle of a summer, you're having a good day. and if somebody blows up half your ice cream and there's only half left and you can triple the price, it's really not a problem. now when it comes to what happens next and where we go from here, and we'll you finish up by telling me if there is an investigation, can we expect any sort of action? well, the swedes are pretty good about stuff. they still maintain a certain level of neutrality, they certainly have a long history of such. the norwegians also being of democratic socialist way of thought, which is it is about the people. and they do share the proceeds of their oil sales and such universally providing health care and other things that

a lot of people find attractive if they live at a place where you don't have such a thing. i would like to think that the swedes are actually quite interested in finding out this problem since they are on the bad end of not getting things like heat in the winter. already, germany has announced that people may not have hot water. they may not have heat. germany is not used to that since after world war 2 ended. and, you know, the people will follow orders is they tend to like to do. but the reality as nobody wants that. so whatever they can do to figure out a fix, even if it's an official excuse through nato saying, well, we believe it's this or that case closed. let's move on. don't come up with some resolution. we'll certainly continue to follow to see what comes out of this radio host carry. harrison, thank you for your time and announces the

violent clashes between protesters and police forces have broken out in haiti as the countries economic and political instability plunges deeper into chaos. tear gas has been fired to disperse the crowds, while gunshots had been heard in the capital of a prince. oh, at least one person is reported to have been wounded during the clashes. haitians have been burning tires and marching in the streets and chanting, anti government slogans. citizens are protesting against the high cost of living, which have already driven many to hunger and poverty. people are also calling for the resignation of hades, prime minister, god, i and that's all for now. be sure to check out our t v dot com for all the latest breaking news and updates was the.