[000:00:00;00] a, [000:00:00;00] a little lost all her over head in the russian city of belgrade is local authorities, confirm, and reception incoming planning and rocket by defenses and new need published revelation from the range. the media outlets,

hopefully you can post it at the fact of the climate embrace months ahead or attack . we learn more about the plan from the project investigative journalist. these are very, very detailed proposals, spelling out exactly where to strike to parade, how it can be achieved either through cruise missiles or with scuba dive on the un general assembly adults, a resolution to condemn last over the recent referendums in look for me putting territories as the russian envoy, gloucester, with hello and welcome to our international my from last goes. just gone for a. i'm here, i'm glad you joined us. i'm right mommy. let's take a look at the latest top stories on this out. we start with the latest from the

conflict and ukraine as an asteroid alert has founded in regions across central ukraine, including in the capitol. heave, made explosions, have been reported in the mail, and we need so regions on russian soil, ukrainian forces all reported to shell, the border city of belgrade. a multiple as logins, lahood, and a city. as a defense intercept, an incoming attack, lord spike bull says there are no reports of any casualties. the grading shilling turned deadly in the dentist republic, as 2 civilians were killed in the city of gold. of course, according to the local mer and in the has on region. russian air defenses intercepted 12 us supplied hi, mom brought it in the nearby city of nevada. cough cough,

cough is under repeated shelling by cubes. forces ortiz cru were on the ground and spoke with lucas about my old colas. his teacher thought it was around 6 p. m. i was on the 2nd floor and went to the corridor and on the bowman started. 3 dolls were torn off their hinges and i was covered by them. and fragments hid them . had my legs and arms injured by fragments, but said alive, she was then i had people crying for help and ran out and to the streets. it was already over when i got here. there was a huge crater, ancient people, broken glass, everything was destroyed inside one room was completely destroyed, 2 walls were demolished, which is i don't know how to restore all this. i john, nancy, marina. here then you can reach me because we can't live like this. there are only civilians here and this place was bombed and everything was destroyed. it's hard. how are we supposed to restore all of this? according to an investigation conducted by the greys a media outlet, the british secret service plotted to destroy russia's current bridge linking

crimea to the mainland. long before it was a tax. on the 8th of october gray zone obtained correspondence and internal documents floating the operation. the files appear to be from a presentation in april of this year old or dangerous, and supportive heath maritime rate operations. it was compiled for high ranking british intelligence officers and outlined a complet scheme to blow up the catch bridge in crimea. this was to be done with the involvement of special trained grain soldiers. the main objective was the destruction of the bridge and the erosion of moscow's war fighting capability. the destruction of a breach of the catch trite, would require a cruise missile battery to aid. the 2 concrete pillars are the sights of the central steel arch, which will cause a complete structure failure. this will prevent any rotary supply from the russian

main lines to crimea and temporarily disrupt the shipping line. now, the final operation included not only the very secret service but the high ranking european politicians. now, according to the revelation, one of these was the former lithuanian defense minister orders book can because who had been previously accused of working for british intelligence. another alleged part has been said to have been the veteran high ranking nato advisor chris the only while a bridge military veteran, hugh ward, created the proposal and detailed the roadmap kit car. ember who took part in the investigation outlines its main details. essentially, this is a proposal that was put together by a senior and rather obscure british military veteran who he was at the request of an individual in chris donnelly, i his request that on behalf of order is to bitchy. it was safe for me to do any

defense minister since that has been both in all sorts of robert g activities like funneling boss amounts of weaponry from bulk area to ukraine. yes, these are very, very detailed proposals. spelling out exactly where it strikes the bridge. how it can be achieved, either through cruise missiles or via or team lead scuba divers armed with particular sensory devices or in the underwater drones. the attack never happened in the way that was outlined in this plan that you've been exposed to the you've got your hands on. why do you think that is? yeah, it differed actually in execution to i was going to pull that of the horror, the unfolding february. it was, was different. but curiously, in the hours within mere hours of, of, of the, the bombing on a separate commemorative, postage stamp, immortalizing the event was released in ukraine. now that post system to take 2 explosions in the exact spot that she would identified as target. one of the

ukranian admin, it says from the rod he said in the wake of the coach bridge bombing, he said, this is just the beginning. do you think there are other potential plans that have been drawn up by various intel communities? this wasn't meant to be one of this was only meant to be the beginning of a wide ranging campaign targeting crimea and russian assets in and around the area . and you know, it was very telling with the wall street john mentioned that the crimea was the new focus and you spoke point of the war and that's where you crave be targeting. and i mean, i think if the in this massive retaliation by moscow starting monday, we might have seen more elements of that proposal become very, very, very real. they know they has general assembly as adopted a resolution to condemn moscow for the recent referendum,

while 143 members voted in favor of the resolution. 5 nations voted against it with another $35.00 abstaining. why let's go live now to new york city. speak to odyssey is caleb nope, and thanks for joining us here in the seats now. okay, the, what can you tell us about the latest boat in the u. n. well, there was a resolution before the un general assembly. that's the body that contained all member states of the united nation. the resolution was urging countries not to recognize the territories that just voted in referendums to join with russia. now at this point, the results are in the past. a 143 countries voted in favor of it. 5 countries, including russia, voted against nicaragua, voted with russia bela roost loaded with russia. north korea voted with russia as did the syrian era republic. and in addition to that, there were 35 countries, including china and india, and

a number of african countries that made the decision to abstain and not vote on this resolution. now, at this point, the results are in and before the voting we heard from the russian representative and then via took the floor and pointed out that these referendums, it was almost a 100 percent vote to join with russia. the people in these regions have spoken and made it abundantly clear that they do want to be part of the russian federation. they don't want to be part of ukraine. the country has been bombing and shelling them for the past 8 years. and the referendums were carried out in accordance with international law, despite claims and attempts by the west to prove otherwise, no concrete evidence that international norms weren't followed and the referendum was actually put forward. now comes, the resolution was highly politicized. and it simply was not a manner for enforcing international law, but simply carrying out the geopolitical aims of the united states. the usa even use economic and political coersion to make sure countries voted in line with it.

they did everything to prevent a secret vote from taking place. they wanted to force countries to be on the record . and so they could retaliate against countries that might both the wrong way and their opinion. so this is some of what we heard from the russian representative before the voting took place. the susan briggs up loose adopting this resolution. the western countries try to achieve their geopolitical goals. and again, use the members of the general assembly as extras expressing commitment to the protection of the international law, which we heard from the representatives of us and other natal members today is a bright example of hypocrisy and double standards. let's remember the situation with kosovo. those criticising our recent referendums were one of the main supporters of kosovo, independence they insisted, kosovo had a right to gain independence if their population was threatened and the rights were violated. this was the official western position which was presented in the

international court of justice. but there was no threat to the albanians in kosovo in 2008. there were no referendums in kosovo. they just declared their independence . but the west accepted doubt back then they insisted the international law did not prohibit them from gaining independence. but what do we hear from them now? you that kosovo is a different thing. so nato was ready to rescue albanians in kosovo from non existent threats. but the people have done boss, her son in saratoga, apparently, according to their logic, are 2nd class people. and they're killing by the key of regime gets no attention from the highly civilized west, because they support russia. washington is one more example. they are now the most passionate critics of the referendums, and they talk repeatedly on the territorial integrity of ukraine's little. they recently said that they were ready to use forces to protect taiwan, which is part of china. it illustrates that there is no sanctity of the principles of the territorial integrity among the u. s. and members of nato,

they support it only when it serves their interest. now, russia made clear that they felt the results of today's vote were due to economic blackmail and coercion by the united states. use disposition in the center of the world economy, 2 strong arm countries into voting in line with what the united states wanted. and even then there were $35.00 countries that abstain and 5 countries, including russia that voted against it. so it's also important to note that we heard some very important speeches from countries that voted to abstain. the chinese representative took to the floor of the un security council and pointed out that it was needed to resolve the conflict in ukraine peacefully. and on top of that, they called for dialogue between russia and ukraine. regarding the situation, they emphasized that sanctions against russia are not going to resolve the conflict . and in addition to that, they made clear that this resolution was only going to intensify the disagreements . now we also heard from the representative of india and when india took to the

floor, they can down the death of all civilians who have been killed in the conflict. they went on to call for dialogue and they talked about how developing countries that are not party to the conflict that are not aligning with russia or the grain of those countries are being affected. the energy costs in the rise in fuel costs, the food shipments and the global food supply that the developing world countries in africa, countries in latin america are bearing the brunt of this conflict. and that there is a responsibility on the part of the international community, not simply to, to grandstand and pound the podium and pass, you know, big resolutions, but to actually bring the conflict to a close. that was the point that india said and that lives across the developing world are depending on that taking place. now. it's also interesting to note that in the aftermath of the vote, we did hear from the un secretary general,

did also urge dialogue on a d escalation of conflict and mediation between forces and a resolution of what's taking place. and that, you know, call from the un secretary general is essentially a call to do the opposite of what the united states is doing. united states is not pushing for dialogue, negotiations. they just pouring more and more weapons, billions and billions of american taxpayer dollars into ukraine. in the hopes of prolonging this conflict. so quite an interesting day at the united nations, i was, was a public vote. every country was forced to make a public statement. we heard from different countries, different aspects of this conflict and how it's affecting the world. we're certainly reflected on in the un general assembly. ok, and thanks for joining us. i'm bringing us up to speed. we'll see you again soon. thanks again. ah. right, you claim seems to be turning it back on the american. i must. this comes out of

his recent spots and outrage online. we suggested a roadmap for peace between moscow and keith via a video showing the billboard was even mosque and other hollywood stalls being removed, paid on social media platforms. yesterday, a city council has commented, saying that publicly thanking loss for supporting ukraine is no longer relevant. despite the world's richest mind, providing free access to the store link into that system for the country. and time magazine and column is even the safety of the evil must discussed the matter regarding securing peace in ukraine with russian president, whether members and we send out to be not true. since the businessman noted that he had not spoken with the russian present in the last 18 months. right, let's live now to discuss the issue further with jill oldman, he is

a polka host of the conservative day. joe, thanks for joining us. here are now a billboard and a loan mosque is being taken down in there. so what's your take on this? i mean, why these are the steps of line? no, i don't think he stepped on a line at all. and you know, the, what's interesting about this is ellen musk is believes in freethought, he believes, and freedom of speech. and he's talking about had a conflict that has resulted in the lives being lost on both sides, both on russia and ukraine. and it was a sensible they basically said that hey, this wasn't a real referendum vote. well, he made the suggestion that they redo the vote under un control of the people wanted russian to leave, that they leave. and he didn't say anything that was insensible. he said things that were sensible, and yet the response from the allies of the united states or the apparatus of the united states is no, we're not going to do that. what we need to do is, is,

is the ball russia and give russia, or she didn't give you crane back. crimea, for me, has been under the control of russia, been a part of russia since 1783. that's true. you can say whatever you want, but it has been a part of russia and 1783 and but by allowing by allowing some sort of peace agreement to go forward, it would allow us to number one saved lives and to set a standard for respecting the sovereignty of other nations, which i don't think this, this cabal, or group of globalist is able to do or wants to do in the united states or in europe. ok, what was said? so i took up a little bit about censoring again. i'm in your opinion, how fall can this. so, censoring of non conforming opinions about nato and ukraine go well, i mean, you just saw ye, connie west get cancelled by chase bank or saying something that was not anti semitic, but then they came out and said it was anti semitic. so they're, they're willing to cancel people for things that they make up and lie about. and

it's just another one of those, you know, i called the radical, this radical agenda, this, this ideological band. it's like a cancer to not only our society but other societies across the world. and if they're willing to do whatever it takes in order to silence anyone that talks with common sense was always interesting. yeah, i mean, in the day, if you do have an opposite opinion about something, i mean it doesn't conform with gen pulpy, feel like you're cancelled. but i mean, house was freedom of speech. i mean, and democracy in the west or the war around the world really? is it being affected in today's society? well, i mean look, what is democracy? what is democracy? what is free speech? i think that it's being challenged around the world and they're redefining the words of what free speech mean are saying, ok, it's free speech. want to be. busy tower, and if it follows our ideological bend, that's not free speech at all. that's, that's totally terrorism. that's,

that's the ability to oppress people into a place where they do and say what you want them to do or say it's, it's, it's building a, it's no different than living in north korea. at that point. you get to speak your mind as long as you speak your mind and you don't say anything bad about us. all right. what do you think the west is pushing forward? the idea that must couldn't have come up with his own initiative. and instead is may be side channeling with the russian president. i got to ask your question how, how do we not think that one of the smartest men in the world was able to build a company, a u. s. car manufacturer, one of the 1st ever in nearly 5 or 6 decades that built a rocket that can be shot and come back and land as and be reused. why do they think that this man is not smart enough to come up with a piece agreement that he thinks would would stop the death of people in both countries? how does that go possible? how is that even something that we're even thinking isn't?

he's not smart enough to come up with his own ideas on how to create peace in russia. and they, the narrative does change a lot like that. but how about the people jen? pub? i mean general public in the usa, do they do? they follow the news as tightly as perhaps we think they do or is it just look, i need to focus on my daily needs. my daily requirements. i don't need by then or the u. s. government, you know, interfering or pushing or bullying or, you know, working its way around the world. i don't know. what was, was a feeling like back home where you are. well, we have this movie that was built years and years ago called the wizard of oz. and he had this guy behind the curtain, and he was had this loud voice, and all of a sudden they pulled back the curtain. they saw it was just as anybody, little man. and the same thing can be said for what's happening. the united states, a vast majority of americans do not follow the focus of what is happening in this ca, ball,

this illegal regime that we have that exists in the united states. and most people understand number one, our elections were stolen in 2020 number 2. that these people don't represent the interest of the american people and do not look out for the interest of people across the world. and so i would say that they're just, we're in this place of shock in days of you know, how do we, how do we regain our footing and take back our government and start doing things that are more sensible. so i think that people pay attention, but i think that the radical left and this, this tech technology companies and media companies have created this, is false front. they use this company called them cast. you guys should really look into a dam cast and it takes one person and builds a 1000000 personas. and then those people go out there and they speak the same thing. they just repeat over and over again. this is propagated media and making it seem as if a 1000000 people have that same voice. but it's really only one person that using technology to make themselves look bigger. and that's really what is happening. united states as a use technology in order to steal the voice of the people here. interesting,

interesting, joe. all done. thanks so much for joining me here today and say i wanted to leave you this. i want to say again. yeah, i want to say this really quick, so i was a tech ceo for a decade. so i do a pod cast. but i ran one of the largest 1st party data aggregation companies in the country. and so when i get involved and talk about what's happening with technology, what's happening of media? i don't, i don't, it's not a theory that i have. it's something that i know because i have the experience in building a company that dealt with fortune 500 companies from enterprise level all the way down to s and b's across the country. so. so this is not a theory. i know what they're doing and i think people around the world know that the doing as well. so. gotcha, thanks so much like 5 years. ok. moving on to our next stop. so now, calls are mounting in the united states for punishment of saudi arabia until the reconsider relations with the gulf states. this off, the re add and the

a plus group of oil producers moved to slash production last week in a move that has infuriated washington ortiz marina, across a river delve into the reaction of the u. s. over the recent decision. washington is once again proven attention because it's now getting what it wants. and what does the us do when it switches are ignored? it resorts to threats and intimidation. there's going to be some consequences for what they've done with russia. what kind of consequences manenda says suspend all arm sales? is that something you'd consider? i'm not going to get into what i consider what i'm have in mind, but there will be, there will be consequences. we have a look the other way as saudi arabia has shopped up, journalists, has engaged in mass and political repression. for one reason, we wanted to know that when the chips were down, when there was a global crisis, that the saudis would choose us instead of russia. well, they didn't,

they chose russia and there's gotta be consequences for that. so to be clear, because so he wasn't deal breaker. repressions weren't a deal breaker, but saw them with russia is crossing the line. so we'll go to americans all riled up oil prices. there is such go all after open class decided to reduce oil production by 2000000 barrels a day. we are locked and injuring the energy market. we are providing security stability to the energy markets, press everything as a price, energy security or the price is one. this is humiliating for the us administration, especially from joe by then flew to saudi arabia himself this summer, asking them to increase production in order to reduce global reliance on supplies from russia. this was supposed to hit russia where it hurts, since the beginning of russia's conflict with the crane. the u. s. and other western nations have been calling

a boy called on russian energy supplies. the us stopped imports in russian oil earlier this year. and the e, you placed a partial, a bar, go on rush and fuel. a price cap is next and they're trying to drag china and india into their scheme. but so for hasn't worked either because they have not only refused to sanction russia over the crime. conflict, what have recently stepped up purchase of russian oil. and now of course there's this. so it's really not going according to plan for america, and not a good look for washington, especially ahead of the mid term elections when americans are already ruling for months of hypothetical prices. with due respect to reason, you have high prices in the united states because you have a refining shortage that has been in existence for more than 20 years. you haven't built refineries in decades. it's a result of the shortage of finding capacity that you have a shortage of gasoline and an increase in the price of gas. it has nothing to do

with the fundamentals of crude oil supply and demand bought. it's easier for america to blame other countries for its own problems, especially if russia is involved. so now it's payback time. i do see it as a deliberately hostile act and what, why would we have troops defending a country that, that behave this way towards us? we sell massive amounts of arms to the saudis. i think we need to rethink those sales. i think we need to lift the exemption that we have given this opec plus cartel from us price fixing liability. i think we need to look at our troop presence in the middle east. what's that about taken away opec community? what did he mean by that? well, there's already a bill circulates in, in washington to sue open plus countries in what they have called, no peck, was dowdy arabia did to help food and continue to wages. despicable,

vicious war against ukraine will long be remembered by americans. we are looking at all the legislative tools to best deal with this appalling and deeply cynical action, including the bill known as no peck. my bipartisan no peck act would crack down on these tactics by the foreign oil cartel. it's already cleared the judiciary committee on a bipartisan basis, and there's no reason why it shouldn't pass as a part of our upcoming defense authorization effort. our energy supply as a matter of national security. and in case that doesn't do the trick, there are planning to put one the 100 on mind vessels in the waters around the red sea, just in case that's what you get after 70 years of friendship. as the former secretary of state, henry kissinger, one said, to be an enemy of america can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal with friends like that a who needs enemies? why this was alive now to canada to read. he could dare say she's

a diary of geopolitical economy and research group where the com, thanks so much for joining us all to this way. now. present by in the highest one, there will be consequences for saudi arabia, off the opec plus oil production cut. okay, let me once this got to do her re add and saudi arabia and what, why these consequences here? well, i think that like all the people who are proposing the know back lo and proposing other laws you to essentially send, show saudi arabia, president biden. this simply electioneering, the fact of the matter is that on the rising oil, the inflation in the united states is only partly due to the war and ukraine and the up he was in the energy market. ah, most of it is gore inflation, which is basically has its roots in the united states, but they've got to blame somebody else. so they, of course, russia always came in very handy. the 2nd thing is that the,

in the decision of opec to got production is actually rather modest decision they're cutting in 52000000 bows. the actual got will amount to even less because at some countries are already producing less than what they, you know, what they are going, what they could produce. partly because of big demand conditions. but nevertheless they, they have decided to make this fact. and it's a purely commercial decision who couldn't blame the producers and suppliers of oil for making a small gotten production to stabilize prices like that's exactly what they're doing and what's more, they have some good arguments in their favor. they're saying that look, you know, if we, if we, on a decent return on, on this resource, we can continue to have the investment that will be necessary in order to keep up a stable supply of oil, etc. so basically, mr. biden is electioneering, and you can also tell that he's election adding because some of his congresspeople

demo democrats in congress have already proposed sort of, you know, again, symbolic legislation that is supposed to, you know, show how much they care about how much americans are being and that bump, et cetera, in reality, they are going to be ineffective. and what's more, they are not going to stop getting the real sources of inflation. which means to tackle the weaknesses of the american economy. well, interesting that inside actually i put it with a little bit about why haps saudi in russia been put in the same sort of, you know, the same. so call them if and i mean all they really trying to plot together is economy reasons. that's why all has been cut so. so bite is politicizing basically what's going on. they say everything that's wrong is russia's fault. i think that