for a most little gloss over head in the russian city own build a fact quite defensive and newly published revelation from the greens. the media outlets claims the u. k. property tax require mean great months ahead of the actual october attack . we learn more about the plan with very, very detailed proposal, spelling out exactly where to strike the bridge,

how it can be achieved, either through cruise missiles or t a. the un general assembly a resolution to condemn moscow for the recent referendum in the former ukrainian territories as the russian. and we've lost the west double standards. a lot of those are the international life from mazda is just on my way. i'm here. i'm glad you joined us. i'm much mommy. let's take a look at the latest top stories on this. how. we start with the latest conflict in ukraine, how the latest from the company, and as, as strike alerts. i found it in regions across central ukraine, including the capitol of key made, made air explosions, have been reported in the mail, and the needs meetings on russian soil. you,

when the forces are reported. shell, the border city of belgrade. ah, your yearly model as well. her in the city as air defense is intercepted, an incoming track wants by keep forces. there no reports of any casualties. the, the crating shelling turned deadly in the done as republic as 2 civilians were killed in the city of coral of car, according to law local mer, and in the hairs on reason. russian air defenses intercepted 12 us supply high miles rockers. the nearby city of and nowhere colker is under repeated shilling like huge forces. ours, his crew were on the ground and spoke with locals about their old, you call us his teacher thought it was around 6 p. m. i was on the 2nd floor in one to the quarter, and then the bowman started. 3 dolls were tone of their hinges and i was covered by

them and fragments hid them. had my legs and arms injured by fragments, but said ally, she was then i had people crying to help and ran out on to the streets. it was already over when i got here. there was a huge crater, ancient people, broken glass, everything was destroyed inside. one room was completely destroyed, 2 walls were demolished, which is i don't know how to restore all this. i don't know yet green yet here, then you can wish new to punish. we can't live like this. there are only civilians here. and this place was bombed and everything was destroyed. it's hard. how are we supposed to restore all of this? according to an investigation conducted by the razor media outlet, the british secret service posted to destroy russia's coach bridge when king crimea to the mainland long before it was a tax. on the 8th of october, the grey zone obtained correspondence,

an intimate internal documents plotting the operation. the files appear to be from a presentation in april of this vehicle or dashes in support of hughes mouse. i'm rate operations. it was compiled by high ranking british intelligence officers and outline compet scheme to blow up the coach bridging crimea. this was to be done with the involvement of specially trained ukrainian soldiers. the main objective was the destruction of the bridge and the erosion of moscow's war. fighting capability, the destruction of a breach of the catch trite, would require a cruise missile battery to aid. the 2 concrete pillars are the sights of the central steel arch, which will cause a complete structure failure. this will prevent any rotary supply from the rushing main lines to crimea and temporarily disrupt the shipping line. the planned operation included not only the british secret service but high ranking european politicians. now, according to the revelations,

one of these was the former lithuanian defense minister orders of chemicals who had been previously accused of working from british intelligence. another participant claim to have been veteran high ranking nato advisor chris donnelly, while a bridge military veteran, hugh ward is said to have created the proposal and detailed the roadmap kit karen burger took part in the investigation outlined the main details. my colleague, rory, sushi essentially this is a proposal that was put together by a senior and rather obscure british military veteran who he was at the requested an individual in chris donnelly. i his request that on behalf of order is a bit yes, it was safe for me to do any defense ministers. and since that has been gotten all sorts of robert g. b effective, it is like funneling boss amounts of weaponry from bulk area to ukraine. yes. these

are very, very detailed proposals, spelling out exactly where it strikes the bridge, how it can be achieved, either through cruise missiles or via or team lead scuba divers damned with particular incendiary devices or in the underwater drones. the attack never happened in the way that was outlined in this plan that you've been exposed to that you've got your hands on. why do you think that is? yeah, it differed actually in execution to watch it or the horror, the over the not february. it was, was different, but the curiously, in the hours within mere hours of, of, of the, the bombing on a separate commemorative postage stamp, immortalizing the event was released in ukraine. now that poster stamp could take 2 explosions in the exact spot that she would identify as target. one of the ukrainian benefits from the rod, he said in the wake of the coach bridge bombing,

he said this is just the beginning. do you think there are other potential plans that have been drawn up by various intel communities? this wasn't meant to be one of this was only meant to be the beginning of a wide ranging campaign targeting crimea and russian assets in and around the area . and you know, it was very telling with the wall street john mentioned that the crimea was the new focus and you spoke with one of the war and that's where you'd be targeting. and i mean, i think if there in this massive retaliation by moscow starting on monday, we might have seen more elements of that proposal become very, very, very real report via the neal sciences, raised questions on line over what it calls, not as deadly russian of facts this comes off the russia and launched over a 100 missiles targeting critical infrastructure across the plane on monday days. also phase one moment tack on the catch bridge. so because they had intended

targets and minimize collateral, it is now spun to russian missiles being inaccurate. that would imply that they intended to strike targets to cause mass casualties. how do you know this? i guess civilian casualties is synonymous with the way the u. s. conduct warfare. is this how we demonstrate, how great our weapons are? those looked like powerful explosions. is it possible they tried to minimize casualties while taking out their intended target? what one us drone strike killed 10 civilians including 7 children in kabul. a year ago. the russian defense ministry has stated that russia's armed forces, it only objects of ukraine's military decision centers and critical infrastructure . enjoying the special murphy operation. he said that the russian missile of many energy and the possible facilities in ukrainian cities work. so for the repair of military equipment and medicine command centers on monday during the targeted

attack, the new york times is not, is not the only media outlet raising questions over the quality of weapons. and russia is implying iranian made kamikaze, drums used by russian earlier reported to be ineffective on the battlefield. while just a few days in several media outlets. prided those same unmanned vehicles as a huge problem and a headache for you creating trips. let's go live and add to the us. larry joseph is a full sci alice and ceo berg associated larry, thanks for joining us here. are see now is interesting. this report how they focus on the strength of these weapons as opposed to, i mean, as opposed to lives lost. isn't it strange that the western media reporting when the cleaning conflict like this, you can be sure that if there were tons of civilian casualties,

ukrainian to be parading the bodies in the streets. and they are not. what's interesting as well. they are covering up the actual casualties of senior ukrainian military intelligence officials, as well as it would appear, some foreign military advisors and intelligence officers that may also have been killed. it does also appear that the casualties that occurred in kiev among civilians were caused not by the russian muscles, but by the failed attempts of the ukrainian air defense system to take out those terms. so the ukrainians fire, there are anti or missiles they crush to the ground and they kill civilians that has occurred in the don bass. when the, i mean, i was told a little bit about actually, you know, when we talk about the number of casualties of pools as casualties on both sides.

we are in a conflict zone after all. but when we focus on the quality of rushes weapons, i mean, does that play into the fires of the narrative that the russian weapons just not good the world. you apparently haven't received a memo from the west that the russians are a bunch of drunken slobs who can barely string together a sentence. they're capable of doing anything that's technologically sophisticated . all the while ignoring the reality that there was russia that had to haul american astronauts to the international space station. because the united states no longer had the ability to construct rockets to carry out that technical mission . the the mean in the west is to denigrate and portray the russians as fools. i think that frankly is a very foolish and dangerous strategy and propaganda on the part of the west because what they're ignoring is, well, like,

what happened in belgrade recently with those the attempts of the ukrainians to launch those missiles. i understand they were harm muscles, us missiles that range in price from $300000.00 to a $1000000.00. and yet the russian air defense system shut them down. those missiles were specifically designed to take out the rushes air defense system fail to do so. so this is actually sending a message is going to be very troubling for the u. s. defense industry. and to. ready the rest of the world that when it comes to wanting to buy modern weapons that actually work and are proven to work on the battlefield. russia is demonstrating very much that it has that capability. and that the capability of the west is very limited. indeed, and that is interesting that the focus shifts between the strengths as if to add, as if to add, you know, there's a, there's a problem with, with the weapon me,

russian. anyway, let's talk a little bit about how things are reported. we try to report here are we want to get both sides of the story and this will be multiple sides of the story. but are we witnessing different ways of reporting in, in the west when it comes, when we talk about the conflicts and ukraine? i'm old enough to remember the weather that the good old days of the battle days of the cold war when the soviets had profit and were notorious for not telling the truth. now it's the united states media, which is behaving in ways much worse than proper shutting down opposition, voices, and spreading out. now lies. you can go back if you'd, if you collected the stories over the last 7 months, where the media was reporting that russia is running out of missiles. i think the last, the last count i solve is like over 60 such stories. so every week or 2, they're coming out, st. all rushes running out of weapons,

yet russia continues to fire. and what it reflects is just a gross ignorance of the industrial capability. the russia has rushes defense, industry exists and is constructed to provide for the national defense. in contrast to the u. s. defense industry, which is designed to cater to, to enriching, if you, well, the defense industry and not necessarily fielding weapon systems that are strategically relevant, or actually tactically function. so it's the, the media on this side. the i've taken sort of the rule of thumb, whatever the reporting, i assume the opposite is true, because they have time and time been proven to be wrong. larry, thanks so much on the i've been great tools into that. so that's true. the balance in media reporting comes back to us in our day and age anyway, and i said fullness analyst,

thanks again for joining us. thank you. i says, move on. now, western politicians are effectively destroying the global energy market. that's what vladimir putin said as he addressed the russian energy weak forum here in moscow, his hues, western governments are being guided only by their ambitions. but if you go, you could click on the screen. if they fail to reach their aims, they undermine and destroy the infrastructure of their rivals. of course, i'm talking about the attacks on the north stream, one nor stream to the light line you attacks are undoubtedly active in the national terrorism. to block your from energy sources to deprive millions of people of resources and force other countries to buy energy resources at higher price in the area. not only did the russian, rather than latimer called the north stream, the pipeline disruptions an act of international terrorism. he also hinted at the possible culprits. he said that the nations responsible for the attacks on

a north stream are those who want to fully cut ties between the european union and russia. and in fact, he eventually mentioned the name's ukraine, the west and poland. and he also added, quote, unquote, like they say, in the west, highly likely everything is clear. the russian lead a went on to say that both north street one and north stream 2 can be repaired. but moscow will only begin working on it. if eventually the 2 pipelines are launched and if their security is guaranteed otherwise, according to the russian president, there is no point in touching the pipelines, among other things. president fulton doubled down on his own assessment that russia wasn't responsible for the global energy crisis. he blamed it on the policy mistakes by western decision makers that are taking their toll on developing

countries to do but the expense estimate this year alone. this is gas pricing mechanism will bring losses to europe in more than 300000000000 years, which is near to percent of the years g, d p. right? this could have been avoided if they use long term contracts with an oil binding. the current difference between spot prices and long term contract prices is $3.00 to $4.00 times and who was responsible for that? i have imposed this model of trade on us. they forced gas prone to switch impact to binding to the spot market. and now they grown that they themselves are to blame them. and other countries, primarily developing ones will have to over pay for these energy resources. the results that comes to the european market is sold there 3 times more expensive. along the chain, these price fuel inflation, which in the eurozone has reached 10 percent video, ordinary europeans, the suffering, the population as in the middle ages began to stalk up on firewood for the winter. what does russia got to do about it? they are always trying to shift the blame for their own mistakes on someone else,

in this case on russia, they deserve that. also vladimir putin refuted claims that russia was trying to make life worse for europeans by using energy as a political tool and reminded how moscow came to the rescue. when american ellen, g exporters abandoned their european buyers and sent their tankers to asia, where a higher price was being offered, you may have expected. we've seen american tank as carrying l n. g supplies change their course move towards other destinations just because they are expecting to be paid more. surely these deliveries are not reliable, and russia was the only one that actually made gas delivery to europe reliable. however, on western counterparts, wouldn't like to remember that. in fact, they say it is moscow that doesn't want to supply them with gas. it's wrong. or if we are guided by contractual obligations under insuring the supplies are made in full. if they don't want to receive our products, we have nothing to do with that. plus the russian president reacted to the decision

by g 7 and e. u. countries to put a price cap on russian oil experts by quoting a famous american noble prize winner. the bottom line is that if you artificially try to limit the prices that only leads to deficit and higher prices plus once again, mister putin threatened to stop selling oil altogether to the countries that join these restrictions against russia. when you stand in pesto let in that we will not supply energy resources to those countries that put on a price cap to those countries, which instead of business partnership and market mechanisms prefer cheating tricks and shameless blackmail. i want to say that we will not act to our own detriment. our principal position is that stability and a balanced energy market and a secure future for people can only be in short through combined efforts in an open and honest dialogue based on the principles of joint responsibility. am all taken into account each other's national interests. but this is the kind of dialogue we

have established without an under the opec class agreement with a major point of discussion at the form has been whether ease current gases or will be enough to get through the upcoming winter this as germany just so that will not take russian gas, why no seem to pipeline of the russian president offered to resume supplies via the lost track link. however, a german government was when i did that, it would receive gas and wire the nose in one which lies broken on the baltic sea floor. the head of the russian energy giant gas from shed his assessment. the situation was our chaise, glucose returning to the question whether europe can survive was injected gas volume that they currently have an underground storage. the answer is very simple and no one can give any guarantee. if we talk about the act of guest volume and underground storage facilities in europe, then we must course talk about germany. the volume of active gas injection

capabilities in germany. amounts to 21500000 cubic meters of gas, or the 100 percent injection. that's germany apparently will pump. about 20 it is estimated, the germany will consume 6 to billing cubic meters of gasoline coming autumn, winter period. this means that gas on the underground storage facilities in germany is enough for 2 or as the most 2 and a half months. that's more resin present, as said, the old white cat being discussed by european lathe is an economic threat to billions of people. we talk to the lebanese ambassador to russia, he says, at the u. s. i'm the e policies towards russia will, 4th, russia to change is energy ex, woke partners. actually, the relations in general between lebanon and russia, is a very good relation. we have longstanding history of far friendship and corporation to put a ha cab on the prices rise cab. i think it contradicts the rules of the market as president putting himself what it right and,

but it's clear that and other rational fishes. i believe that if this have been, than simply a rational, not sal, it's oil as simple as this. it will sell it to other market would in which they don't put the price gap or price ceiling on this. and i believe that the european now public are suffering of that because, you know, as we are hearing from news that there is shortage in adversity, in oil and gas stations. and this, i mean, so we believe in lebanon from the 1st beginning, that all the problems and the whole world should be dealt with a through dialogue, through political solution. not lou sanks is, especially when this century is, is not imposed or approved by the united nations. which the only, i mean, a international organization that can impose sanctions, you know, after the cooperation and the approval of all countries before him is scheduled to

last for 2 more days than last week is going to discuss the prospects and challenges for global energy sectors. will of course, be bringing you more on this coverage as it happens. a united nations general assembly has adopted a resolution to condemn moscow for the recent references in which full territories voted overwhelmingly in favor to join the russian federation. while i'm 43 members voted in favor of the resolution, 5 nations voted against the another. 35 abstaining the russian ambassador to the you and condemned the resolution before the vote. cooling out the critical double standards the plugs up against adopting this resolution. the western countries try to achieve their geopolitical goals, and again use the members of the general assembly as extras, expressing commitment to the protection of the international law, which we heard from the representatives of us and other natal members today is

a bright example of hypocrisy and double standards, there was a resolution before the un general assembly, that's the body that contains all member states of the united nations. the resolution was urging countries not to recognize the territories that just voted in referendums to join with russia. now at this point, the results are in the vote. his past, the 143 countries voted in favor of it. 5 countries including russia, voted against it. nicaragua voted with russia. bela bruce voted with russia. north korea voted with russia as did the syrian arab republic. and in addition to that, there were 35 countries, including china and india, and a number of african countries that made the decision to abstain and not vote on this resolution before the voting. we heard from the russian representative then zia to the floor and pointed out that these referendums, it was almost a 100 percent vote to join with russia. people in these regions have spoken and

made it abundantly clear that they do want to be part of the russian federation. they don't want to be part of ukraine, a country that's been bombing and shelling them for the past 8 years. and that the referendums were carried out in accordance with international law, despite claims and attempts by the west to prove otherwise, no concrete evidence that international norms weren't followed in the referendums was actually put forward. the usa even use economic and political coersion to make sure countries voted in line with it. they did everything to prevent a secret vote contains play. so they wanted to force countries on the record. and so they could retaliate against countries that, that might go wrong way. i in their opinion now russian ambassador to pansy, it out it's locker. see how the united states and its allies seem to recognize the sovereignty and independence of regions at their own convenience. when it came to the situation in kosovo, they had

a very different reaction to the votes and feelings of populations. those criticizing or recent referendums were one of the main supporters of kosovo. independence they insisted, kosovo had a right to gain independence. if their population was threatened and the rights were violated, this was the official western position which was presented in the international court of justice. but there was no threat to the albanians in kosovo in 2008. there were no referendums in kosovo. they just declared their independence, but the west accepted that back then they insisted the international law did not prohibit them from gaining independence. but what do we hear from them now that kosovo was a different thing? so natal was ready to rescue albanians in kosovo from non existent threats, but the people have done boss, her san in saratoga, apparently, according to their logic are 2nd class people. and they're killing by the key of regime gets no attention from the highly civilized west. because they support russia, it's also important to note that we heard some very important speeches from countries

that voted to abstain. not the chinese representative took to the floor of the un security council and pointed out that it was needed to resolve the conflict in ukraine peacefully. and on top of that, they called for dialogue between russia and ukraine. a regarding the situation. they emphasized that sanctions against russia are not going to resolve the conflict . and in addition to that, they made clear that this resolution was only going to intensify the disagreements . now we also heard from the representative of india, and when india took to the floor, they came down to the deaths of all civilians who had been killed in the conflict. or they went on to call for dialogue and not simply to, to grant and an audi am and pass, you know, big resolutions, but actually bring that on to a close. that was the point that india sat and that lives across the developing world are depending on that taking place. so why don't interesting day at the

united nations, i was, was a public boat. every country was forced to make a public statement. we heard from different countries, different aspects of this conflict and how it's affecting the world we're certainly reflected on in the un general assembly. you claim seems to be turning it back on the american tycoon anal mosque. this comes off as reason to sponsor an outrage online. we suggested a roadmap for peace between moscow and keith. a video showing the billboard with isla moss and other hollywood saws being removed appeared on social media platforms . yesterday. this a city council has commented, saying that publicly thanking must for supporting ukraine is no longer relevant despite the will, richest man providing free access to the starling internet system. for the country . time magazine column is stated that must discuss the matter regarding securing peace in ukraine with russian present realm in person. this turned out not to be

true, as the businessman noted that he had not spoken with russian present in the last 18 months. joe alden podcast, host of the conservative daily says us politicians want to silence anyone who goes off script this stablish narrative. what's interesting about this is elan mosque is believes in free thought. he believes and freedom of speech and he's talking about how to end conflict that has resulted in the lives being lost on both sides, both on russia and ukraine. so he made the suggestion that they redo the vote under un control of the people wanted russia to leave that they leave. and he didn't say anything that was insensible. he said things that were sensible. and yet, the response from the allies of the united states or the apparatus of the united states is now we're not going to do that. what we need to do is d, ball russia and give you crane back a crimea they're willing to do whatever it takes in order to silence anyone that

talks with common sense while they're up. so this is our nation fidela with cross talk. will the back of the top of the out with a look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except we're such orders that conflict with the 1st law. and just in case we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. and the point obviously is to place trust rather than a various job with artificial intelligence. we're somebody with.