not to another school because he doesn't feel good breed global. i'm saying is about how she took on hub these to broadview enough with you with a you have something to hide, not to the accusation made by rushes foreign ministry against western powers after they refuse to disclose information from an investigation into the recent explosions on russia's nord stream pipeline system, also i had on the program with little under sometimes one do i do regional countries. there's kinda things for experimenting. south africa is energy minister accuse is developed countries of recklessly experimenting with the continent. economies on treating african nations with

a severe lack of respect with washington. this decision to curb the supply of mike brit ships may create a less stable world. singapore, as prime minister responded to the recent us, move all the imposing restrictions on tech exports to china. with across the globe or run the clock, this is our t pleasure to have your company today. my name's unit. no. rush is foreign ministry spokeswoman said western powers at pier complicit in the recent explosions that damage the nord stream gas pipeline system. under the baltic sea, laurie is a heart of directed the following remarks to swedish officials. i still am douglas . what is it that have found that he didn't want to show any one wasn't something

from nato. something fell into her hands and you can't show it to any one, but it doesn't work like that. do you know why? because you just say that you have something to hide. it means that what you found there shouldn't be seen by anyone else because it proves that it is the collective west that is behind everything that happened. there was that hospital, so i'm used to the last month multiple ballasa damage the major pipeline route, which had been a crucial source of russian gal supplies to the you. the incident calls mass quantities of the fuel to bubble up to the surface. sweden has refused to a law, russia to participate in its investigation on has stonewall mosque, was efforts to access information from its saying that it is strictly classified with ashcroft live now to our to contribute our rachel mars. then for more in this hi there, rachel? yeah, moscow has singled i'd sweden in it's accusations, take us through maria, the harvest statement. well,

not only is sweet and refusing to share its findings in the north stream, attacks that earlier this week, germany was also acting tight lips refusing to disclose any details to its parliamentarians. now member german parliament and former leader of the left sarah wagner. nach had this to say in response the federal government is telling us that had no something but for reasons of the states well being, it can not even disclose it to the members of parliament in the javin, bundis tech security agency. in any case, this approach means that any control and criticism of the federal government by the opposition is impossible. does anyone seriously think that if russia blown up its own gas pipelines, the centerpieces of its economic trade links to europe in the west, that sweden and germany would, wouldn't even hesitate for a 2nd, decry from the rooftops. they had proof. this incident happened right off the coast of these countries. now surely their investigations would be able to detail what

was present in the waters off of those coast at the time of these attacks. and now we're being told that the findings are so sensitive to national security that they just can't be shared. that's interesting because how many times as national security evoked by the west in western countries to bury the truth about politically sensitive incidence. they just conveniently slap on a top secret classification label and everyone's left to speculate and nothing ever gets confirmed until maybe many years later, you know everything from the j, f. k, assassination, u. c. i a and allied regime change initiatives in iran, latin america, africa, all over the globe when western allies get caught spying on each other than they can get hushed up all under the guise of national security. those things has just been snuffed out and disappeared. now the big question that some of us were half jokingly asking right after these pipeline attacks was how the european union would react. if it ever came out that the u. s. responsible for these attacks?

would they sanction the us? because now without rushing gas, the you most recently for president not coin germany, connie, mr. robert havoc, whining about paying exorbitant prices for american liquefied natural gas as one of the only viable options that they now have left. so having to sanction the us would be pretty much the final nail in the coffin and would risk turning it into a sort of west or north korea. but if it's any consolation pentagon spokesman, general patrick rider does that, washington is ready to help say, quote, remain, of course, ready to tory, if necessary in these investigations that the west is conducting. well, not even russia whose infrastructure this is as they invite to assess, actually russia been told pretty much to just go take a hike. so washington right now is kind of like the guy who saddles that to you, offering support. right after a really bad break up because he sees it as

a chance to make his big move as sometimes well, you know, it's not even unheard of to find out much later when you're with him. that he actually may lay a role in instigating the breakout from which he alternately benefited. thanks for taking us through all of our t contribute our rachel marston. or i, let's say bring, you know, some hard hitting remarks from south africa as minister of mineral assets and energy from this week. at gwinnett, a mantell. she said that developed nations exploit african countries with crippling loads and isolation. he was speaking during the africa power week forum where top business men on policy makers gather to address critical challenges in the energy sector. developed countries. sometimes one do use o d regional countries as can impeach for experimenting as painful. i must say that because when that happens you'll get didn't sector as a, as

a smaller economy you off was to be a coin. you don't way, diaz, off of those. you can think you kind of the origin and, and, and then until december and is that we have this partnership between our servers of over and you and you, it is a state of the 8.5. we learned quite impressive and retired. that's a gift. it's another gift, it's a loan, but over a concession alone, that is more about over it is up to a clint. mr. mantell, she statement came ahead of the us climate change conference to be held next month in egypt. south africa is expected to present a plan named up receiving the $8000000000.00 in loans and grants. simplest pledge, last year out the comp summit to help be carbonized. it's a column me, ortiz cut, abo la tough, le outlines the challenges,

know that the continent energy sector faces, as zillow climate negotiates as prepare to haggle over greenhouse gas emissions at the 27th united nations climate change conference in egypt. the better life already draw, according to the global carbon projects. the lion's share of c o. 2 emissions will continue to be led by china asia, europe, as well as the united states, africa accounts for bally 4 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. and the most industrialized economy on the continent, south africa accounts for 1.3 percent of emissions. these, what is numbers? do not quite square up with the pressure being heaped on south africa to turn it back on cold. all in the face of europe's clamoring for the very same cold, the one south africa to stop using the country is being and ties to with lowes to

help them fund their transition. but some critics argue that this is south africa making itself the sacrificial lamb. and the altar of green energy. why are we offering ourselves that there must be? i'm asking the question, because we, i mean, we've got choices we, we can actually not resist but put an argument that our development will depend on secure energy and currently fossil our secure sanctions imposed on russia by europe are increasingly coming back to bade them critic say this highlight the hypocrisy, angie or politics of energy transition in the world. this will also affect the technology choices each country makes to what sustainable energy transition. and according to the international energy agency, i will pass to ned 0 emissions will be much harder and more expensive without the use of nuclear power. it is not only about renewables is really about cleaner and

less technologies. and nuclear is, is one big sauce of and low cabinet, a power cord there post issue there in cape don't is given us in is that for to says or unit. so it has been more division and the lowest cost, every other dignity is catching up with newer. and even though renewable energy's atlanta, they still need baseline back up. and in south africa's case, that means code. and that means that fossil fuels, as well as renewable energy, might have to work in tandem. we still have an option to add more renewables on our base. so we leave you your base lot intact or reduce very, you know, minimally. but you put renewables on top. that's what gemini has done that for us was 3 less doing. they are not taking out that despicable power. the 80 more on top

of that, the spiritual power, if south africa and africa, to win the fight, to use their own energy resources to develop the economies and uplift the people in a well planned and coordinated manner. the continental need to be firma and avoid getting tied up in agendas of with the nations private capital. it's already knocking at the door, trying to own a piece of the developing world energy system. but critics argue, lodge capital inflows only wad instead of restrain unsustainable bad economic policies, and that could help the developing world, even much smaller than climate change itself. got melissa oddity, china's back. what speaking of energy cats are the world's 3rd largest natural gas, 6 sport her has refused to divert more supplies of the commodity from asia to

europe. this winter, it is sure to stark morning at the use energy crisis will only get worse if the block doesn't focus more in fossil fuel to nuclear power to. you just don't have enough volume to bring in to replace the gas for the long term. unless you're saying i'm going to be building huge nuclear plants, i'm going to allow coal, i'm going to burn few oils less welcome live onto the program. now, especially in monetary policy and political economy. dr. kelly's, i'll count her from do how you're most welcome sir. your view of the situation then overall, how bad could things get for the you and mid this gas supply deficit? well, let's order the bad. you know, that's what i'm trying to deduce from russia, barley to 0 by the 2030, however, mr. fortune has started to see months starting to bucket back in june

and supply energy supply and almost completely by the beginning of last month, september was about 70 percent of the original 40 percent due to this crisis. and you said they are almost done our but what, what about what will happen? i've said about the re run off the disorder and how long this will will love then is another problem to julie price. energy buyers in relation with the general information and then to make the public station and so on,

so forth. so they, are you talking about the media to maximize the why fi in your solar by your engineering, from division media, r o homer, how long this will take and how much is on the non you know, the substitute for in ports. and also i would suggest that they also to maximize for some other what about as possible then do was to go to go back to what i will unfold given the available structure in order to do the

same this time. so solution as we see is bad. other sources of import? no, no, we can only about 1000000000 to meet that. that's also going to decline with maintenance. united state, locked in for the next step to excellence g and europe. lock them, put it on them, but it's still your pipeline on the need with the same situation applies. who are working on the line from other we down on are going to be john is limited under jim was out of when them in the function in creating so you need to be the room. you didn't transfer you

to race for most of the order to construct basis for that. it's not much that can do over the short run unless it's heavily binding. that's what you're given. even given that they haven't been on it claiming that they have that's what i was calling face sort of trust them. but lots of headlines today in the west, talking at by guitar refusing to divert supplies from asia to europe. don't say that the contracts are suckers, some we put them in. we're not going to just get rid of our partners because the west demand that what is your view was guitar justified and not move was. was that i suppose to do that. then do you have

a good use to order the contract that are long term basis or asian, but it's not much less to do to divert to do, to toyota, but got to produce $175.00, about 175000000000. give me a union. busy thing about 150000000000 meter from, from russia. so what was other supposed to do for you is not willing to sign a contract with them and all that it will finally got to put forward huge investment and that would have to be and if you have to secure a customer ahead of the funds. so what is the point then if you, let's say, for example 2 or 3 or 4 years, and then we have a customer for a month and what you do with this investment,

what do you do with that? what about the clock is willing to proven to be a source of energy, a reliable source of energy in even the previous you want to test at the heat distribute between. but i wasn't able to talk about that also need to know that the other was facing with a strong global lawyer. busy can i, can i just put another kind of kind of just point on that to you as well, sir. the opec plus decision recently to reduce oil. i put widely, criticized by the, by the administration. how do you see that situation? not this session affecting the u. s, for instance, oh, well, this decision by the, by the, by the so the was based on our study or for part of the month. it,

they believe that that it could be a global recession in china and other countries. and they are forecasting and going ahead of the market who support all the prices. so this is their argument. united states is again waiving the no, but i don't want it to again to the saudi on to the all because i think this is losing impact because every time you know, the best use it as a bunch of action to in order to support the chain on a on or now you want to increase the production in order to support your other country. so what about the interest of the producer then

you know that's being neglected by being i stayed on by the west and what i want to add that a few post. it might give us one about that there is a put one of the pos for the other with age. it would have been done a long term basis. and well, that was facing strong demand, particularly on us. but because of what you do have to maximize that, you guys ation, it's not that part of the over the coming decade was b to b. p of and i thought does market in order to support, but i'm sure to want to buy it on any away from my go shocks on this ability. and you also need to go to fight it sources not to put it in one bucket before. i mean, there is a common or there is a common wrong for both sites. work on, you know,

and there is no short solution for you. there is none, but you want to over there. sure. even over the medium medium. and we'll have, we'll see if this major the adjusted by or by the reliance on how much. busy this when when i. busy a lot of issues isn't there, as you've just been going through. time has beaten us or as always, we appreciate your time. your thoughts? economist colleague, i'll count her life from day to day. many thanks and the singapore is prime minister has war enough. the u. s. decision the curb, the supply of microchips to chinese companies may create quotes or less stable world. the island nation's leader was responding to the news of sweeping

restrictions on tech exports to china. the bite and administration's latest move is a very serious one. i'm sure they have considered it carefully. we do worry that valid national security considerations may trigger further consequences resulting in less economic cooperation, less interdependency, less trust, and possibly ultimately a less stable world. the us impose large scale restrictions on exports of semiconductors and ship making equipment to china. earlier this month, washington expects taiwan home to the world's largest chip maker to abide by the punitive measures. any nation or corporation that wants to bypass the bon would also need to apply for a special license from the u. s. the chinese government saves the restrictions will weaken the global economy. to van ginger fence, the trolley placing cab for political purposes destabilizes the supply and industrial chain, perhaps others and backfires on 1000 who will only further weaken the already

fragile wild economy. while some western suppliers cut trade ties to chinese chip makers in response to the u. s. export control, the new report has concluded that you countries may have to shut down production in parts of their auto motive sector. that's a soaring energy prices crippled swathes of european industry and cuts in the availability of semiconductors looks at to exacerbate supply chain issues. just to go through this advance computer chips, their vital for high and manufacturing equipment. while beijing has been trying to boost domestic production, that remains heavily dependent on supplies from some of the world major producers in the us. so it crew anti one semiconductor chips are also used in weaponry manufacturing, where china consuming more than 3 quarters of the chips. so globally, henry, whining thunder of the center for china and globalization phase, the u. s. will meet wave of criticism from the foreign companies directly affected

by washington's move. this kind of rare gesture, this kind of policy is sending away negative messages throughout the room for protection as well. for i solution for, for unilateral museum and a beach of the food show, the spirit that you as has been printed christian for all those years. and has been leading bad force over the years. it's really sad to see this is really happening. and i mean, you know, comp, i have all those companies a pipeline to china for the largest the market, the but in the lower this is rudy doesn't make sense. you can imagine, you know, maybe 5 percent. but what i was saying was made in china is only chips, and i'm going to hold was company renting china clinical sales, 6 percent of its troops in china. i mean, i do think business makes sense. so i'm, we're thing, you know, is a josh or i'm us government, but i hope that we're not really room for us. that are so much, i'm a really big,

i mean, a lot of the opposition from the business community. i don't think this going. this policies, as well as the can carry that fall. can us turn attention on the program now to the ongoing congress of the chinese communist party, which is laying out the country strategy for the next 5 years and build ah, on the 5th day of the meeting, politicians from the world's most populous nation expanded on china's foreign policy objectives, priorities. beijing single died to western quote, hedge a monic aspiration says the main threat to international order. it also condemn us actions in taiwan, including high speaker policies, recent visit in august. chinese officials, however stressed as well that global cooperation is a main priority for them at citing examples. the belt road initiative on beijing

strategic partnership with moscow. without doing let's go live no to die, kill you. a correspondent child is c g t n news. jennifer moore, on today's developments hello to you. foreign policy at the forefront of the congress on thursday. how does china see the current environment for international relations? well, the current environment, it's quite complicated and i think your coverage on the both the update story of chip, it could be one of the examples where that was trying to dominate the intellectual chip industries throughout the world and to starting up the entire market change in asia and that couldn't rate the fact china, while speaking of the congress itself, there was the or delivered to the national party congress and mention about that the timid them in the nation in the international relationship. and the report says

that so far there isn't had somebody had the money i standard and bullying act of using strength to intimidate the weak and taking from of this by force and playing 0 sum game. and this is kind of a, some of the trend by the western world and a china is absolutely firmly opposed to that. what chinese holding promoting is the week when cooperation taking the belt a role initiative as a sample. so for many perks that prospective china is initiative, it's really providing the varmints for dialogue and conversation, and with mutual benefit, all the time was belton road was now about the forefront of the meeting today. because whatever is a nice, really, is the focus for the, the large part of this decade for china. so what were the main foreign policy priorities outline today?

well, i mean, china is the foreign policy has been very consistent and it's also always filed or peaceful developments among many countries. and besides belt enrolled, there are many other examples that can really help trying to submit into the international entity. it's a promise on the carbon neutrality for the sake of the climate change, tackling climate change, and also it's, it's a commitment to the world he's by sunday, peace keeping tubes. so many, many perspective that china has done is to promote a piece for development in the entire changing world of our di. you mentioned that shyness and that western hedge money and block thinking, our major threats to, to the world order that was being spoken about. how does beijing country those threats? was there anything mentioned learned?

well, you mentioned that you mention about the question that a tie one, take that where that for example, china has been very committed to resolving the taiwan question with a peaceful resolution. but there is the long term of degree of the orient interference to the taiwan question. which side china clearly sees it is a internal question or better because people in the mainland and in the, in the time one are both chinese. so this kind of a little political interference. it's the main purpose purpose. ready is to curb china as development, and china is certainly again if i may just touch another point as well. china is deputy foreign minister highlighted the strategic partnership between beijing and moscow. high, does china seas out developing was not spoken up. the conference the strategic

cooperation really covers multiple perspectives. not only the trade but also from b inter pur, people to people communication mean packaging in a multiple politically has very close ties, but also in the society front. the friendship between china, russia, really life or there are a lot of times, i think this relationship at the very close thing, the former soviet union for a time. and speaking of the crisis between russia and ukraine and china, it's always promoting for ease for days on the prices on one hand, trying to acknowledge that the nature of each word expansion really hard at the both of interest. and on the other hand, trying to then the on the very new tool, our perspective in the, in the old side would be able to sit down where nico.