wanda cells will support, we choose to look for common ground. a with ukraine wants to draw nato into or direct war with russia using a dirty bomb falls block as a pretext that's according to russia's deputy envoy to the un. 13 people are reportedly injured and the done as were public after ukrainian forces launch multiple strikes on its capital and adjacent areas. and the u. s. department left 325000 afghan rescue program applications and read a mid promises for the vitamin ministration. help those who worked with the u. s. military during the complex

ah, from moscow to the world. this is our international. i'm rachel blevins, and these are the top stories this our t at wants to drag nato into or direct war with russia by using a so called nuclear dirty bomb. that's according to russia's deputy envoy to the un students. katie xen wants to avoid 1st of all defeats secondly wants to involve need, so for their ex, flesh with russia, which is very dangerous, and, but which we will be profitable for him to remain in power. dmitri pollyanna ski with the, the russian deputy ambassador to the us. he spoke and made clear that russia is not threatening the use of nuclear weapons, but it's simply not accurate. prior to that survey lab,

rob the foreign minister of russia, has referred to such claim this frivolous and fiction. now, when fully anthea was speaking to the breast, emphasized that the un security council meeting was held behind closed doors for security reasons. they wanted to present information, the other members of the security council. they did not want to be public. what we understand the ministry of defense of russia has come forward saying it has evidence that apparently is planning some kind of dirty bomb provocation, nuclear provocation, that they would then blame on russia in order to hurt russia, you know, its image around the world and also draw in nato forces to intervene. now russia share this information with the defense ministries of the united kingdom of france, of turkey and the united states. after the un meeting us officials called out russia for daring to accuse ukraine from a u. s. standpoint, the allegations that ukraine is building

a dirty bomb or false. we have not seen at this time though, any indication that russia has made a decision or intends to employ nuclear weapons or a dirty bomb. but there would be consequences for russia, whether it uses a nuclear weapon or dirty bomb lensky, the ukrainian president has been hands it. then it is possible that ukraine itself may be proliferating nuclear weapons. and recent remarks zelinski talked about the need to get beyond the boot of past memorandum of 994. and that is an agreement that stipulates that ukraine cannot proliferate nuclear weapons. and we have heard similar comments from ukranian officials since 2014 president. this negotiations and consultations fail again, or concrete decisions on security guarantees for ukraine or not taken based on

their results than the ukranian side will have the right to believe that the budapest agreement does not work and will question all the package decisions of 994 and the obligations of guarantor countries. we will use all the resources we have including to create effective weapons, dirty or clean. this is a separate technological issue. ukraine has no other choice either. we are part of in the lines such as nato and do our part to make europe stronger. we have the only option, which is dawn by ourselves and may be think about nuclear status again. now, the russian ministry of defense is indicated that it's possible the united kingdom could be cooperating with ukraine around this issue, a possible nuclear proliferation, which is quite a serious issue. now it's important to know that western leaders are not emphasizing or addressing this concern about a possible nuclear dirty bomb provocation. political analyst alexander patch told us that ukraine's government could potentially stage

a false flag attack to get more support from the west. keeps western backers have repeatedly mentioned on nuclear weapons and war russia against using them. and of course, russia had no reason to use them. but then i, when, when, when the russian allegations came out, i think they sound very credible because kim is definitely starting to feel war. they're desperate to get any sort of western support. and about the only way they can really gather direct western support is by staging, some sort of a false flag and accusing russia that knows that their only chance at all that they have left is to pull in the entire western alliance on their side. and ukraine at

the cost of causing world war 3. the ukrainian conflict now has another direct participant or wrong. at least according to white house officials. to ron is now directly engaged on the ground and through the provision of weapons. that's how it impacts and civilians and civilian infrastructure in ukraine. meanwhile, the u. s. hospital, nancy pelosi is also criticized a wrong denouncing around a large support from russia and contracting it to us, attempts to make the world a quote safer place. i think iran is making a big mistake. we've been trying for a while now to have a nuclear agreement with iran so that we can make the world a safer place. and now they're going off aiding the russians and making boat a less safe place. in the weeks since rush, i began an aerial strike campaign on ukraine's military and energy infrastructure.

following the attack on the crimean bridge, the u. s. has accused ron of direct involvement in the conflict by supplying so called kamikaze drones. though both russia under ron, deny these claims, washington and ukraine, the other nato allies have made no secret of their large weapons shipments to kiev, but maintain, they are not involved directly despite ukraine using the weapons to strike russian territory. nato chief johnstone bert has described this as defensive cooperation. our cooperation with ukraine is defensive. it's built in the way it fits to russia. the aggressor is russia. let's cross lived to can stone from the hamilton coalition to stop the war. to discuss this further. ken, it's great to have you on the program today. now, do you think that the world should be worrying about iranian drones and why do you think that we're having this conversation now, especially when drones from another country being the u. s. has been used

extensively globally, often to a devastating effect. so why the sudden is there all of this concern? i think the world should be worried about the unrelenting u. s. nato. proxy war and ukraine. ah, that war is the aim of that. what war is to do to the russian federation? what it did, those, the u. s. a. nato did to you. it's la via and the $990.00 s. they defeated, they divided it, they gobbled it off, and that's what they'd like to do to russia. what's really worrisome is that the u . s. and nato are pushing and out of the envelope. they are raising the stakes all the time with more and more dangerous provocation such as the sabotage of the north stream pipeline. and all this talk of a dirty bomb. people in the world should be worried that this conflict,

which is instigated by the u. s. and nato may push the war in ukraine into a nuclear conflagration. and why are they talking about it now? i think i'm, why are they talking about iran now? i think it's a projection or of ups for cation because for years the u. s. has run, as you pointed out, a drone program, a deadly lethal drone program. in many countries, the world killing thousands of people, mostly innocent women and children. and that's only half the story. the other half of the story is that thought that lethal drone program is illegal under international law because it essentially is extra judicial assassination. and it takes place on the national territories of countries that haven't given us permission to do. so if you wanted to talk about drones, if the, if nancy pelosi wanted to talk about drones without having

a double standard. she could look at the city where i'm sitting right now, hamilton, ontario, canada were most of the optics for us in turkish drones or hey, how come she doesn't say the canada might be a danger to the world. it's a double standard. in my opinion. you make an excellent point. now speaking of that double standard, why do you think that washington and nato prefer to turn a blind eye on attacks on russian territory with the weapons that they supply to crane? i mean, doesn't that make them a direct participant in the war, especially in the same way that they're wanting to claim that are wrong, is well, as your correspondence pointed out, it's hypocrisy again. i double standard that the canada u. s. u k, and many other countries are port billions, tens of billions of dollars into ukraine and inter dissolve in the form of weapons funding, volunteers, and training. chanda, for example, has

a project called project unifier. and which canada spend hundreds of billions of hundreds of millions of dollars since 2014, to turn the ukranian army into our defacto nato army. and when our government rep pork found that the canadian army knowingly trained neo nazis as part of this operation, the only thing they were concerned about was not stopping the operation by preventing the canadian people from finding out about it. right? is that knowing part of it that seems to be the part that they really care about there? now another aspect of this is nancy. pelosi is claim that iran is making the world unsafe right now. but at the same time, us authorities are pushing a one must supply iranian protesters with starling satellites. now what do you

think is the u. s. motives to get involved in or wrong domestic affairs, especially when they're handing out these accusations about what they think that iran is doing on a global stage. well, we have to remember who nancy pelosi is. she is, i want a corrupt us politician who has enriched her spouse while in office. she is a millionaire many times over. thanks to the will you, alas, a military industrial complex. and she is a part of our government that for years has supported regime change in iran and is now supporting arm the opposition groups in order to overthrow the government in iran. she has been involved, she has a trouble maker wherever she goes. just a few weeks ago, she was in taiwan and almost sparked a war between the u. s. and china. so this woman,

this woman is part and parcel of the u. s. war machine. and partly, and her personal goal is to try and cause as much trouble for the countries of the world to, to create instability in which the u. s. can intervene and militarily and politically. and so a lot of arms, that's her game, i troublemaker, wherever she goes. and she's certainly, it seems to be going a lot of places now. and brian, you know, i'm saying if i could, rachel in that is that across north america. 2 last week, anti war groups in 60 or 70 different cities pro, to tested against the kind of escalation that the u. s. is doing and ukraine. and i think that, that people in the west are realizing more and more that this is a dangerous situation. and there should be a d escalation, there should be

a div id feeling of the conflict and there should be peace talks to bring about a political settlement. well, i'm glad you bring that up. and i know that, that certainly the hope is that that conversation will continue, especially as the average people continue to be affected by their governments on policies. now, do you think that there is a correlation between the amount of weapons at the u. s. supplies to ukraine and the chances of a negotiated solution here. and do you think that that public pressure is going to have an impact on what politicians decide to do when it comes to this conflict moving forward? absolutely. public pressure has been important in stopping or ending every us war, at least since vietnam. and i think that if enough pressure can be brought to bear by the american people on their elected representatives to send a political signal to you. to tell mister zalinski that the jig is up and it's

time to negotiate. then i think we'll see a change in change in ukrainian policy. and i'm a beginning towards a new, a settlement, a and negotiated settlement to this war. if, as a lensky does not want to agree to such as a settlement, then the u. s. by cutting usaa nato by cutting off arms and funding to ukraine would drive the message home. it's time to bring this war to an end before it gets any bigger. certainly a lot of stake there can stone from the hamilton coalition to stop the war. thank you so much for your time and insight. my pleasure. ah, 13 people had been wounded in the non us republic following tuesday, shelling by the ukrainian army according to local territorial defense officials.

the capital city was shelled at least 6 times throughout the day. ukraine's forces reportedly use multiple launch rocket systems in the attacks. the explosion, scattered, shrapnel across the area, damaging several buildings and cars in a residential district artes roman coast, euro visited the scene. great, now we are in one of the areas that was struck by ukrainian nationalist. this is a cafe and it was so full of people during rush hour right now you can see that it's well destroyed and there are so food on the table. people apparently were able to finish their meals and people who were outside phil victim to this. you create in shutting now this is just one of the districts that came on to fire this tuesday, according to official information. ukrainian nationalist fired at least $250.00 shills. by the way, those shows were a very high caliber various weapons were used,

including those that were produced by nato countries. room on culture of archie, the nest people's republic. you, as democrats have withdrawn their letter to president joe biden, calling for a d escalation of the ukrainian conflict and negotiations with moscow. according to the chair of the congressional progressive caucus, the letter was sent to the white house without proper venting. the letter was drafted several months ago, but unfortunately was released by staff without vetting every war ends with diplomacy. and this one will to after ukrainian victory the letter, although re stating that basic principle is a distraction at this time and we withdraw the letter. more than 2 dozen congress democrats initially signed the letter calling on the president to push for a ceasefire and a negotiated solution to the conflict. this comes as the white house pledges more cash and military support for ukraine urging ki, have to keep fighting while some

u. s republicans feel voters want the white house to focus on domestic issues. but i'll tell you when i've been on the campaign trail, laura about 500 and i think 8 days now. nobody ever asks about what that commission is up to. nobody ever asked about ukraine. everyone's asking about are wide open border drugs pouring in, illegal immigration. they're asking about the education system. this brainwashing are children. they're concerned about the crime that's rising on the streets. and that's why they're voting republican, because republicans and the new republican party have the common sense ideas to the problems that we're facing. talk show her steve mas barrick says the letter withdrawal is a political game with democrats worried it could hurt their election prospects. i think that withdrawal of the letter is all politics. i mean that, that that's why i mean they're claiming this letter was written in july. it was just sent to the president monday. and on tuesday they panicked and they withdrew

it and the chairman of the congressional progressive caucus is, oh, it was a mistake. the letter was embedded. we didn't mean to send it over. forgive us. this is politics, it's ridiculous. they think that it will hurt democrats in the elections coming up if this letter was to stand. now, i don't see what's so bad about the letter. i'm calling for negotiations between the u. s. and russia taking the letter back was all politics, all political. they're terrified that it's going to hurt them in the election, but you know what? i don't really think it will. and recent polls show that a small minority of republicans filled the u. s. should keep up its support for yet, according to polls, only 29 percent of registered g o. p members support the idea that washington should be helping ukraine. that's in contrast to 56 percent of registered democrats . you feel the same way? the balls also show that overall only 42 percent of americans believe the u. s. she

continues supplying a kiev and had mounting criticism at home by there has been warning voters about the alleged dangers of a republican when in the mid term elections. election is a referendum, is not a referendum. i should say it's a choice. everybody wants to make it a referendum for this. the choice between 2 vastly different visions. for america, democrats are building a better america. very want republicans are doubling down on a mega, mega trickle down economics that benefits to very wealthy. fail the country before and will fail it again if they would. well, i think that the republicans have a very good chance of taking the house and the senate. i mean, they're, they're almost guaranteed to take the house with a large majority in the senate. it's going to be a little closer. i think that the american public is concerned by crime, by inflation, by the economy and by education. and when i say education,

i mean the democrats in all the cities in the school systems indoctrinating young children about transgender is of all the republicans have to do is take the house. and there will be investigations launched into joe biden, hunter bite. and his son, their business dealings and, and several other issues be withdrawal from afghanistan. so i think it's going to be very, very interesting to see how, how the republicans conduct business once they retake the house after the after the 1st of the year. the usda department allegedly left 325000 afghan rescue program applications and red. that's after washington pledge special. the says and relocation for afghan locals who helped us forces and america longest ever war. the state department inspector general reported that tens of thousands of emails from afghan seeking safety were simply left unopened with

the state department breaking guidelines by stalling the applications. the program was launched after the u. s. withdrawal from afghanistan last year, but the white house is promise it has been left unfulfilled. today's an impulse milestone as we continue to fulfill a promise to the thousands of have good nationals who served shoulder to shoulder with american troops and diplomats all the last many years in of garrison. we will quickly to relocate special immigrant resa eligible f kensal to home sway to the united states to us for suitors abroad, all to 3rd countries so that they can wait and safety while they finish their visa applications. afghans are not the 1st have been left with nothing after washington's promises to provide help or rocky refugees faced the very same problems of getting us special visas. more than 1200000 or rockies remain displaced . with 4100000 in need of humanitarian assistance following chaos in their country,

which ensued after the 2003 u. s. invasion. in the aftermath, thousands of iraqis applied for american visas with most not getting a positive response. journalists and former c. i, a analysts, john curious goose as washington has a track record of broken promises, especially when it comes to countries affected by u. s. military operations. i think that this has something to say about nationals of any country that the united states occupies or attempts to occupy over a long period of time. there's always a very well thought out plan to go into these countries, but there's never a well thought out plan, but how to get out of these countries. and we end up just abandoning them. and abandoning the people who, in many cases like you know, spend a lifetime trying to help the united states, the white house, the state department,

and to a slightly lesser extent, the pentagon making promises that they just are not able to keep. we promised iraqis, for example, that we would resettle them. we promised the kurds that we would resettle them. we had a program to resettle syrians. this is a very common bureaucratic problem, not just in the united states, but all over the west, where once we announced the end of a policy, for example, the, the war in afghanistan or the war in iraq. literally everybody loses interest and they move on to other things. so look at it this way in this big, heavy, lumbering bureaucracy. that is the us state department. we always have a plan to go into these countries and we never have a plan to get out on a chinese state own. semi conductor manufacturer has fire fired several american

employees in key company positions. the move comes after the u. s. issued a new set of restrictions on selling semi conductors and ship making equipment to china earlier this month. and another attempt to curb the countries access to high tech components. the move is seen as a sign of the increasing stand off between the world's talk to economies which spark concern on social media. i am also confused by the decision of biden regime, the u. s. regards the chip industry is one of the most important industries, while china as its largest consumer market. if the u. s. doesn't sell chips to china, who will fill the market gap strangle his enemy by strangling himself. the americans are quick to present china as predatory and dangerous, but curiously, there are also those who speak in war terms and drive the rivalry to new heights. the u. s. just declared economic war on china with the latest round of sanctions against china's microchips america has proved. they will stop at nothing to contain

china's rise, even if it means destroying america's own microchip. companies. for more details on this, let's cross live now to human rights attorney dan co valid, dan, it's great to have you on the program today. now what do you see is the motives behind the latest restrictions on china's high tech sector? well, clearly this is all part of the u. s. is war on china, warren russia, the u. s. a is now pretty openly, ah, in conflict with these 2 countries. and it's now decided to, to go out to china in this way, in part, over taiwan. but taiwan is just a pretext again, the u. s. is decided it wants to be the only superpower again. and so it's going to try to be cap china. busy through this maneuver, yeah, the u. s. s certainly staying busy when it comes to foreign policy decisions. now

these moves are seen as a significant escalation of the ongoing effort to constrain china's domestic chip ambitions. do you think that these sanctions will have the desired effect on china's development in the long run though? of course not. i mean china is proven time and again that they can develop technology quickly. they're going to figure this out. they're going to make their own ships. and guess what, as your commentator mentioned, the us mike or chip industry will not have its biggest buyer anymore. maybe some of those companies will go out of business in the u. s. and guess what? and we're going to have a shortage microchips again in the us, right? so all these sanctions that the u. s. is imposing on on countries like china and russia are just shooting ourselves in the foot and some gay shooting ourselves in the head. right. and everything seems to be connected at the end of the day. so do you think that this move could backfire?

of course, given the fact that china dominates most of the global supply chain of rare earth elements that are essential to most high tech components. and do you think that the u. s. is really taking that into consideration right now? you know, i do think it will backfire in the way that i mentioned. i think china will end up, you know, making it so mike, with chips on mass and it won't need us microchips anymore. again, they've done that for so many other products. and the us will be locked out in the cold. i mean, the u. s. are they not considering these things? i don't know that the us seems to be acting out of spite. i mean, the u. s. now has worn a foreign policy in spite which is kind of an incredible foreign policy. but you know, they say, you know, if the want to go after the enemy and commit revenge against it and you better dig to great, right? your enemies in your own, the us is digging its own. great. yeah. speaking of really that, back and forth,

we saw that china fired a number of american employees from micro ship producing companies, which is seen as a retaliatory move. do you think that we're going to see further tit for tat actions between the u. s. and china moving forward? i think almost certainly, i mean what's gonna happen is. busy again, china and russia in concert are going to turn away from the west. they didn't want that. they wanted to be, you know, connected to the west, but by necessity, they're going to turn in word towards each other towards new partners. and in the end, it's the west, it's going to be hurt by that. you know, the china makes so many products of the united states. many u. s. companies are based, they're making products. apple probably most famously with their iphones. you know, at some point that man and you know,

maybe that will mean jobs coming back to the us. but i doubt it. probably those jobs will go to a country with even lower wages in china. and again, china will just continue to, to out, compete us. yes. one thing to hear the statements from us politicians is another thing. when those prices are really start to skyrocket when they actually start making move human rights attorney dan co valid things as always for your time and insight. thank you, rachel. and that, that's all for now. be sure to check out our t dot com for all the latest breaking news and updates. we'll see you right back here at the top of the hour. ah ah, the.