how that strategy will be successfully, very difficult time to sit down and talk with dominating the world is somebody the west is put at stake it guy. what is going to do a lot of my peers thought assessments of quote, the west, the game against the world in a speak to the annual session of the vogue discussion club, the russian need to address the number of political issues for the scale back a plan report say the u. s. administration plans to rework it. price count on russian oil. i mean growing great to find out to market with toys that

have reportedly admitted to trying to empower different social movements around the world. i made a long mask, the ongoing plan to purchase, to company with a very well welcome because off the international with the latest that world news update is great to happy with our bloody, dangerous, and dirty game. that's how vladimir putin has described. the west's current international policy, it was speaking it be annual session of the val die international discussion club here in moscow where he addressed a number of major global issues. here are some highlights of the president's speech that goes away with the so called collective west them. it's a nominal term, of course, just as no unity there in the past few months is made a number of steps towards escalation folks, listener, miram dominating the world is some of the west has put

a stake in its game. but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody, and i would say that dirty up near the dispute is univision. we assume not the systemic was a doctrinal crisis of the american stone, neo liberal model of world older. they simply have nothing to offer the world except for the continued had gemini at the, when you're selling their prayer. today's universal rule to the west is to turn everybody into instruments used to achieve its goals. and if anyone doesn't want to become such an instrument that they are targeted with sanction worship, or even face organized coups. and if none of this works is the ultimate goal is to destroy them. so she has a, let's go now to work on a boy co host of ortiz, it well to pass ox on. i good to see you. i present piercing was speaking for a long time. the q and a session was particularly interesting. could you just break it down for some of the main points? well i, it was a fairly long more than 3 hours. and the very wide ranging speech in which i put in

a position to himself, not only is the head of state or the commander, hugh, but i think also as both the historian and future ologist. as you pointed out, his main idea was that the current arrangement of power in the world, in which western elite deemed themselves to be both the leaders of the world and the and in which they approach the rest of their world as a, as a resource base as something that is, i came to that old property was unsustainable, not only because the west failed and what it assumes itself to be that is the leadership. it failed to address any number over global issues. be climate change, global inequality, food and energy crisis. in fact, we have wouldn't suggested that it was through the very short sighted policies, political policies of western, at least that those crisis where exacerbated with he went even further than this.

he said that we have come to a point in mobile development and human development. when countries around to will no longer be one to be held in servitude to the interest of the powers that be at those interests, according to him, serv, not even the western societies. he talked a lot about russia having lots of allies in the west. many of the people in the western countries do you know, resonate with what the russia stands for. but according to large human pollutant, washington leads everything that they do ultimately serves that own very, very narrow interest. and he believes that this is going to continue for some time . he predicted that the next decade is probably going to be one of the most dangerous decades since world war 2. nevertheless, he tried to reassure both the vol die audience. and i think global audience is that

russia on the stands is responsibility before the rest of the world. that it will act responsibly, 1st and foremost as a, as a nuclear nation. and that it wants to secure and nothing more than its own security interest security and national interest here is exactly what the russian president has to say. meet you when you go to, then you go. and if we have never said anything about the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia, but tony him to the state of western countries and that is not my chance. however, he did it. but we have published special service data about the fact that some kind of incident with the so called dirty bomb is being compared. grandma scott is easy to make them. we even know where it is being prepared. remnants of nuclear fuel have to be slightly transformed and technology and ukraine allows us to be dr. with them put in place when an explosion happening. and then they will say, russia has done it, not a nuclear strike,

but we don't need to do it. neither politically nor militarily, and you do it you know, in the russian language to we're world and peace is actually the same, are actually the same worth it's meal. and that was one of the sort of refrain messages in vladimir put in speech. he said that russia is interested in a fair and a peaceful world. and one way, the major way of achieving that is through the respect to global diversity, economic diversity, political diversity, ideological diversity, social diversity, cultural diversity of religious diversity. and he said that that would benefit from the symphony of civilizations from the symphony of cultures. and this sort of unification that the west tries to impose on the rest of the globe. arguing that its weight is the only way,

was not only abusive and disrespectful of other cultures, but also extremely exploited. and he said that i like the soviet union during the cold war. russia doesn't want to impose anything on anyone. it's not fighting for anything but its own national interest, but it tries to do ultimately, it tries to do it responsibly and it also tries to be mindful of everybody's interest. in fact, this a phrase, balance of interest or balance of power was one of the most common phrases in the speech. and let me put in believe that that kind of approach resonates with the rest of the world. you said that the russian doesn't need to offer the world, any new ideology. and this is something that many russian political scientists were trying to suggest to him that the russian needs to be a sort of the new global ref. a revolutionary trying to replace

the united states to try trying to offer the world some new ideas. he said, no, the only thing that we need to do is to fight for our own interest and do it fairly did openly. and that may gain russia sympathy of the rest of the world. now are a couple of delegates, a fall die for i'm sad that within dark countries including western countries, but also countries in africa, in china, in asia and latin america. there were many people who rouzan and they could with not only what russia has been doing, but many of the pieces of life with him. and he said that he knows that he knows that russia has support from the rest of the global community. let's listen to what he had to say good as soon as the benefits of globalization begun to profit, not only western countries, but also major agents, states,

the west immediately change or even abolish the role step was to such arrogance has been in place since colonial times when they considered all peoples 2nd cause, but themselves today, new centers of power are appearing. take asia, africa. yes, africa is a poor continent as of yet, but it does have great potential and look at latin america. all these countries will continue that development solution that if you're with now, this is not the 1st time he draws parallels between the and to colonial struggle of the 20th century, an antique head, to monique struggle of our times, he made a point earlier that the anti colonial struggle reach, by the way, moscow eagerly support created many, many save without necessarily liberating them from economic political dependence. right now the world is prime for liberating itself from the old servitude of the

western civilization or the western powers. but he also made a very interesting and repetitive point that russia was not quieting again. the west was not actually even fighting against western believe that if it had a lot of allies in the west, typically was asked whether he has any message or, you know, ordinary people in the western countries. him, he said that people in the west, ordinary people who do i need to know that russia is not the enemy rushing, not trying to take anything from them. it's only once you have the right to develop according to its own culture, according to its own vision. and in balance and fairness with other countries, many thanks for that, that's all on a boy co host. well, depart appreciated. well, another topic they've got to me if he touched upon in his speech was the united

nations security council. me president, saying that the world to think about changing the council, the structure. so we were flex global diversity. we got reaction from finish journalist the younger put code in who also believes that the un doesn't reflect the most polar world. as we see, the more people are world use actually implementation off to you and charter in general. but, but the problem in the body of us security commercial doesn't reflect the reality of today's world. and let's say that the un security council is too much controlled by the so called golden 1000000000 of the western countries which are actually only one voice in the world. and in the same time, the growing nation is like india in china. and many major players. when the geopolitical field are totally without them, they're all an independent voice. actors want to have

a role in the, in the, in the world politics. but they don't have the base from where and by whose voice they are giving. and i think the beast, the whole fundamental problem of the credibility of the west in the political arena . and certainly they want to force the european union as federation. but this battle is only to begin. you haven't been full but yet. and i think that when these a plan having european union as a geopolitical player, it will face a huge resistance from the battery as all around the europe or us administration has reportedly been forced to rework his plans, put a price cap on russian oil or the invest the warnings and they growing risk to financial markets in the claims america is not likely to come up with a more loosely police cap or the higher price than before to contribute to rachel

marston has no. so this russian oil price shop was washington's idea. and the only countries willing to buy into it right now are the western dominated g 7 group of countries plus australia, and maybe south korea as well. and at a higher price than what us treasury secretary, janet yellen want it. so more like a $60.00 bow mark instead of $40.00 a barrel. and by the way, year old crude is currently averaging around $74.00 a barrel. so why the higher cap? because washington is worried about spooky investors and the free market, which is after all, a cornerstone of western capitalism. so the last thing that markets need right now is more volatility to add to the high inflation. but europe isn't happy with washington right now because it need much cheaper energy in the wake of sanctioning its own cheap gas supply from russia. brussels is also reportedly upset that the u . s. isn't as willing to act more recklessly with its oil supply, like you have and figures that this high price cap won't hit russia's revenue hard

enough. so brussels is learning pretty quickly that when push comes to shove, washington is not going to sacrifice its economy and industry are purely ideological purposes to the extent that the u has in the interests of sticking to russian president vladimir couldn't. so the whole idea of the west trying to control global energy market is pretty absurd. any way, not like india or china or africa or the middle east are going to sign onto this. so this idea of a western buyers cartel at some kind of counter to opec plus is like fantasy football, a game that nobody seems to be interested in, except for their little clique. and washington is really upset that the saudis, as a member of opec plus, are calling the shots on oil prices at the time when washington's goal is to force those prices down with a strict oil price cap. in order to start russia, revenues, saudi arabia is accusing team america,

world police of trying to police global energy market. now, not just through attempts to cap sale price of russian oil, but by other means as well. people out of depleting emergencies stocks. yes, had depleted, used it as a mechanism to renew it. markets while it is profound purpose waste to mitigate shortages of supply losing emergency stock may become painful in the months to come. we're learning now from western media reports that biden thought that he had to deal with the saudi to boost oil production in order to lower prices in the wake of his visit to re out over the summer. but it sure doesn't sound like the saudis were on the same page. not only has that production hike, not materialized, but at the devil's in the desert forum in riyadh this week. the saudi energy minister said, quote,

we keep hearing argue with us or against us. is there any room for we are with the people of saudi arabia. so clearly riyadh isn't going to sacrifice its own revenues just to appease washington and sticking it to prison. and since bossing around the saudis hasn't really worked out, while the white house warned wall street to think about, quote, reputational concern before heading off to that forum in reality. so there's dwindling unity now, even between washington and wall street over which countries to treat like a pariah. and that list just seems to be getting longer as countries insist on defending their own interests, rather than catering to washington. us president biden claims he doesn't want conflict with china while simultaneously little j. what has been described as a tech war against paging. t correspondent, caleb moore pin brings us the story. joe biden just met with top military leaders

and he laid out his position in relation to china. we must maintain, as i said, no turn around is. we're making a clue. we don't see conflict told, we're looking for competition stitched of competition back. gonna be conflict. but we are going to compete, so just competition, not conflict, that's what joe biden says, but it doesn't look like friendly competition. when the united states is moving to crush china's ability to produce semiconductor chips, these trade policies are being called out as unfair. the reality is that the u. s. is determined to use microchips as a tool to contain china. there is no possibility of reconciliation. and what was nancy? pelosi is trip to taiwan is not an effort to provoke conflict. anything we saw us media cheering on and egging on the possibility of some kind of military confrontation resulting from it. now the u. s. a is piling all kinds of weapons

into taiwan. and there is a bill before the u. s. congress that would essentially renege on the one china policy. the state seems to be prepping its european allies for war, as well, urging them to stockpile weapons, and of course, purchased more of them from the united states. we hear from us colleagues, actually advice, invest in your own strategic enablers because there might come a time and it could be pretty soon when actually we, the u. s. might be engaged fully elsewhere in asia pacific and we will be simply unable to support you. and as washington goes, so goes there allies. a poll now shows that 50 percent of those living in australia would be in favor of military action to defend taiwan. so while joe biden says he does not seek any confrontation or conflict with china, he simply wants competition. his actions tell us something very different and the. busy result of those actions going to have dire consequences for the world war is

a very intense thing. thought that twitter have reportedly admitted to trying to empower different social movements around the world. that's made a long mask on going planned to purchase the company is donald court broke down the story for earlier in the studio with my colleague peter school. while the alarm musk pretty much walked to right through the front doors of twitters headquarters, a with a full sized porcelain sink in his hands. and he later posted the video on twitter with the caption entering twitter h q. let that sink in. so no doubt that was a publicity stunt to build some hyper on the fact that you learn mosque is set to take full ownership over the social media corporation on friday. but while he was there, he also rejected reports that he was planning to get rid of 75 percent of twitter staff. that what that he just said that was not true. and this was a statement he made just several days after we saw

a group of twitter employees apparently write a letter, pleading with eli must not to go through with these plans that was published on by time magazine. well that, let's say, thoughts a lot about how those possible layoffs could affects with his ability to quote the influence, the public. what exactly did he mean by that? the law. yeah. the, the word choice of the honors of this letter was definitely very interesting because alongside all these claims that ilan mosques, decision to lay off workers was, it would be reckless that it would be an act of work or intimidation. there was also a sort of tacit admission that twitter actively tries to influence people's ideas and political opinions around the world. let's take listen to what the letter actually said. isla must splash to lay of 75 percent to we to workers will hurt to it as ability to serve the public conversation. twitter has significant effects on societies and communities across the globe as we speak. twitter is helping to uplift independent journalism in ukraine in iran. as well as power as social

movements around the world. i must cause previously hints, dust off, up, twits, i have a quote to strong left wing bias. do you think that's the case? don't? well, it would probably be better to say more accurate to say that they have an anti republican bias. after all, must made that statement. he pointed towards that bias, after twitter failed to censor a journalist who act openly called for violence against anti abortion conservatives on the platform. and of course, the biggest example of some sort of anti republican bias would be the platforms decision to completely banned the account of former republican president donald trump. so people have been complaining about one sided moderation on this platform for a while now. and that's likely something that's going to change if and when you on must takes control of the company or spain's prime minister has had better days. mistakenly referring to kenya, us and they go twice on in front of the canyon presidents the spain. so sure,

a potential ally on many fields, areas that we can work together to san diego theme you us, kristen, them office and they go on really looking forward to working. ok. can you sorry, sorry. can you are hearing a televised event in nairobi, padre sanchez proclaimed his country's readiness to strengthen bilateral ties, but there mistakenly cold kenya, so they go and then repeated the blunder. shortly off that cooling canyon, president william roots over the precedence of senegal. his hosts laughed off the mistake briefly, interrupting sanchez to correct him. ah, a popular shooter video game franchise has raised eyebrows and it's the latest revision which players seek to kill. a military general here looks uncommonly like an iranian assassinated in an american drones joined in iraq.

the visual general brought a copy in the 1st 5 minutes, the new call of duty has you pilot, the missile that kills sola, money law. the new call of duty starts with assassination of general solar money to the player has to kill him in order to start playing. they have changed the name, but call of duty more than warfare to starts off with an assassination by miss all strike of a military figure who passed a striking resemblance to general cassim for the money the head of around the lead cars force. he was killed in an as strike as baghdad airport in 2020. the installment is not the 1st the call of duty to have cause control the sea and 2009 more than warfare to featured a mission titled, no russian. and which players can participate in a massive shooting at

a russian airport, while in 2019 a level called highway of death depicted russian soldiers as war criminals destroying a convoy on a fictional country major highway. but in reality, the highway of death was a war crime committed by the us who attacks defense. they say rocky soldiers trying to flee to wait during the end of the go for many people. it's another case of western media, inserting its political agenda wherever it can fly. mohammed neuron the professor at the university of toronto, explains why the west chooses such vehicles for soft power in western countries. what they try to do, both through the state and big business which are in bed with one another, is that they try to train the younger generation to teach the younger generation, to show hatred and contempt towards those entities that are

critical of western domination and western germany, just like what we've seen in hollywood, just like what we've seen across the board in western western cultural manifestations. so this is nothing really new. this is to be expected. but i think that as the situation in the west, the periods and as their fortunes decline, and as it becomes clear that their empire is failing, they will become more crude and more abusive in the way in which they depict the other barren victims, the peoples that resist western imperialism and western combination. all the latest news updates. you can check the website

r t dot com. thank you for choosing audience. national. ah. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race is on, often very dramatic development. only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very difficult. time. time to sit down and talk with russian state little never the tires on the most i'm seeing with

anyone else with will ban in the european union, the kremlin. yup. machine the state on russia for date and our t spoke neck. even our video agency, roughly all band on youtube with me. ah

oh russia is the aggression? no. if injured much about we have any quality for russians. we have actual racism, bigotry, against russians. it's now dangerous to be russian. murell. 2, well, one was a food comp ignored soon as possible. it a nation suddenly disliked was the hotel it always there and only now come to the for the most told was the most for, for so for the is router will be

a new one hasn't been seen before in their perspective, a form, some delia. the studies before door a new unit i knew you started with, you know, people not yes. who's dial? it was exact or could go with that here because that's a theme is usually when you got a home was a hotel with conservative. i mean, it was due to mr. you should throw border over here. all we gotta do is get him over the head and just tell him the right way to live near is going to do it as a whole. do it before i let you know the war, but just to be i just play a shy many the kids. i tried to understand why my own colleagues

use a 90 person on tuition for position. i'm in some results and i disco, gurley g or so since long, long time. game it and is a well known journalist and politician. he had the geneva pres club that wrote a famous book, creating loose, a phobia from the great religious schism to anti boot in hysteria, in which he contends the russo phobia in western europe isn't new, but has been there for centuries to source for, for big narrative is set on 2 main arguments. one is russia is with dorsey. it was a tier one. the with thought was a tier one during subject times. and now it's to run you doing to president sure. a lot of times the 2nd phone is worse than expansions russian failure. this is hopelessly.