cell support, we choose to look for common ground. with dominating the world is some of the west is put state game this game with danger. a lot of my pay things talk assessments of quote the with the game against the world in a speak to the annual session of the vanguard discussion club, the russian need to address the number of global issues, forced to scale back a plan report, say the u. s administration plans to rework its price count on russian oil. i mean growing great to finance with the bumper toys and ha, reportedly admitted to trying to empower different social movement around the world

. that the mid e long must be the ongoing plan to purchase to company with a. a very well welcome. this is off the international with the latest that world news update is great to happy with our bloody, dangerous, and dirty game. that's how vladimir putin has described. the west's current international policy. he was speaking at the annual session of the val die international discussion club here in moscow where he addressed a number of major global issues. here are some highlights of the president's speech that goes away 0, but the so called collective west them, it's a nominal term, of course, is no unity there in the past few months is made a number of steps towards escalation. cousin listener, miram dominating the world. if some of the west has put a stake in its game,

this game is certainly dangerous, bloody, and i would say that dirty up near the dispute is showing that we assume not the systemic was a doctrinal crisis of the american stone, neo liberal model of world older, they simply have nothing to offer the world except for the continued had gemini, at the, when you're selling their prayer, to those universal rule to the west is to turn everybody into instruments used to achieve its goals. and if anyone doesn't want to become such an instrument yet, they are targeted with sanction worship, or even face organized coups. and if none of this works in the ultimate goal, is to destroy them of shackles. let's go now to work on a boy co host of ortiz, it well to pass ox on. i good to see you. i present piercing was speaking for a long time. the q and a session was particularly interesting. could you just break it down for some of the main points? well i, it was a fairly long more than 3 hours. and the very wide ranging speech in which i put in

a position to himself, not only is the head of state or the commander, hugh, but i think also as both a historian and future ologist. as you pointed out, his main idea was that the current arrangement of power in the world, in which western elite deem themselves to be both the leaders of the world and the and in which they approach the rest of the world as a, as a resource base as something that is, i came to that old property was unsustainable, not only because the west failed and what it assumes itself to be that is the leadership. it failed to address any number over global issues. speed, climate change, global inequality, food and energy crisis. in fact, we have wouldn't suggested that it was through the very short sighted policies, political policies, uh, western elite that those crisis where exacerbated with he went even further than

this. he said that we have come to a point in global development and human development when countries around will no longer be a one to be held in servitude to the interest of the powers that be at those interests. according to him. serv, not even the western societies. he talked a lot about russia having lots of allies in the west. many of the people in the western countries do you resonate with what the russia stands for. but according to logic pollutant western leads, everything that they do ultimately serves that own very, very narrow interest. and he believes that this is going to continue for some time . he predicted that the next decade is probably going to be one of the most dangerous decades since world war 2. nevertheless, he tried to reassure both the vol die audience. and i think global audience is that

russia understands is responsibility. and before the rest of the world, that it will act responsibly, 1st and foremost as a, as a nuclear nation. and that it wants to secure and nothing more than its own security interest security and national interest here is exactly what the russian president had to say. meet you when you go to then you go and if we have never said anything about the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia, but tony him to the state of western countries and that is not my chance. however, he did it, but we have published special service data about the fact that some kind of incident with the so called dirty bomb is being compared. grandma scott is easy to make. am we even know where it is being prepared? remnants of nuclear fuel have to be slightly transformed and technology and ukraine allows that to be dr with his m put in place when an explosion happening. and then they will say, russia has to launch a nuclear strike, but we don't need to do it. neither politically nor militarily,

and you do it you know, in the russian language to we're world and peace is actually the same, are actually the same worth it's meal. and that was one of the sort of refrain messages in vladimir put in speech. he said that russia is interested in a fair and a peaceful world. and one way, the major way of achieving that is through the respect to global diversity, economic diversity, political diversity, ideological diversity, social diversity, cultural diversity of religious diversity. and he said that will benefit from the symphony of civilizations from the symphony of cultures and this sort of unification that the west tries to impose on the rest of the globe. arguing that its way is the only way, was not only abusive and disrespectful all other cultures,

but also extremely exploitive. and he said that i like the soviet union during the cold war. russia doesn't want to impose anything on anyone. it's not fighting for anything but its own national interest, but it tries to do ultimately, it tries to do it responsibly and it also tries to be mindful of everybody's interest. in fact, this a phrase, balance of interest or balance of power was one of the most common phrases in the speech. and let me put in believe that that kind of approach resonates with the rest of the world. you said that the russian doesn't need to offer, there was any new ideology. and this is something that many russian political scientists were trying to suggest to him that the russian needs to be a sort of the new global ref. a revolutionary trying to replace

the united states to try trying to offer the world some new ideas. he said, no, the only thing that we need to do is to fight for our own interest and do it fairly . do open me and that me gain russia sympathy of the rest of the world. now are a couple of delegates, a fall die for? i'm sad that within dark countries including western countries, but also countries in africa, in china, in asia and latin america. there were many people who rouzan and nathan with not only what russia has been doing, but many of the pieces of logic with him. and he said that he knows that he knows that russia has support from the rest of the global community. let's listen to what he had to say. we good as soon as the benefits of globalization begun to profit, not only western countries, but also major agents, states, the west immediately change or even abolish the role step was to such arrogance has

been in place since colonial times when they considered all peoples 2nd cause but themselves renew today. new centers of power are appearing. take asia, africa. yes. africa is a poor continent as of yet, but it does have great potential and look at latin america. all these countries will continue that development socialization with. now this is not the 1st time he draws parallels between the and to colonial struggle of the 20th century and, and he had to monica struggle of our times. he made a point earlier that the anti colonial struggle reach, by the way, most eagerly support created many, many save without necessarily liberating them from economic political dependence. right now, the world is primed for liberating itself from the old servitude of the western civilization or the western powers. but he also made

a very interesting and repetitive point that russia was not fighting against the west. it was not actually even fighting against western believe that if it had a lot of allies in the west pacifically was asked whether he has any message or you know, ordinary people in the western countries. him, he found that yes, people in the west ordinary people and there was need to know that russia is not the enemy. russia not trying to take anything from them. it's only once you have the right to develop according to its own culture, according to its own vision and in balance and fairness with other countries on the many thanks for that, that's all on a boy. i hope all is well appreciated. while another topic they're not going to have to touch upon and his speech was the united nations security council. me president saying that the world should think about changing the council,

the structure. so we were flex global diversity. we got reaction from finish journalist the younger put code in who also believes that the un doesn't reflect the multi polar world. as we see, the more people are world use actually implementation off to you and charter in general. but, but the problem in the body of us security commercial doesn't reflect the reality of today's world. and let's say that the un security council is too much controlled by the so called golden 1000000000 of the western countries, which are actually only one voice in the world. and in the same time, the growing nations like india in china, and many major players, when the geopolitical field are totally without them, they're all in an independent voice. european union actors want to have

a role in the, in the, in the world politics. but they don't have the base from where and like whose voice they are giving. and i think the beast, the whole fundamental problem of the credibility of the west in the geopolitical arena. and certainly they want to force the european union as federation. but this battle is only to begin the haven't been full, but yet. and i think that when these a plan having european union as a geopolitical player, it will face with huge resistance from the battery as all around the europe or us administration has reportedly been forced to rework his plans to put a price cap on russian oil or the invest the warnings and they growing risk to financial markets in the claims america is not likely to come up with a more loosely policed cap or the higher price than before the contributor rachel

mawson has no. so this russian oil price chap was washington's idea, and the only countries willing to buy into it right now or the western dominated g $7.00 group of countries, lots australia and maybe south korea as well. and at a higher price than what us treasury secretary, janet yellen want it. so more like the $60.00 bow mark instead of $40.00 a barrel. and by the way, year old crude is currently averaging around $74.00 a barrel. so why the higher cap? because washington is worried about spooky investors and the free market, which is after all, a cornerstone of western capitalism. so the last thing that market need right now is more volatility to add to the high inflation. but europe isn't happy with washington right now because it needs much cheaper energy in the wake of sanctioning its own cheap gas supply from russia. brussels is also reportedly upset that the u. s. isn't as willing to act more recklessly with its oil supply like the you have and figures that this high priced cap won't hit russia's revenue hard

enough. so brussels is learning pretty quickly that when push comes to shove, washington is not going to sacrifice its economy and industry are purely ideological purposes. to the extent that the you has in the interest sticking to russian president vladimir couldn't. so the whole idea of the west trying to control global energy market is pretty absurd any way not like india. 6 or china or africa, or the middle east are going to sign onto this. so this idea of a western buyers cartel at some kind of counter to opec plus is like fantasy football, a game that nobody seems to be interested in, except for their little clique. and washington is really upset that the saudis, as a member of opec plus, are calling the shots on oil prices at the time when washington's goal is to force those prices down with a strict oil priced cap in order to starve russia. revenues. saudi arabia is accusing team america, world police of trying to police global energy markets now,

not just through attempts to cap sale price of russian oil, but by other me as well. people out of the think that emergency stocks, yes, had depleted, used it as a mechanism to renew it. markets while it is profound purpose waste to mitigate shortages of supply. losing emergency stock may become painful in the months to come. we're learning now from western media reports that biden thought that he had to deal with the saudi to boost oil production in order to lower prices in the wake of his visit to re out over the summer. but it sure doesn't sound like the saudis were on the same page. not only has that production have not materialized, but at the devil's in the desert form in riyadh this week. the saudi energy minister said, quote, we keep hearing argue with us or against us. is there any room for we are with the

people of saudi arabia. so clearly riyadh isn't going to sacrifice its own revenues just to appease washington and sticking it. and since bossing around the saudis hasn't really worked out, while the white house warned wall street to think about, quote, reputational concern before heading off to that forum in reality. so there's dwindling unity now, even between washington and wall street over which countries to treat like a pariah. and that list just seems to be getting longer as countries insist on defending their own interests, rather than catering to washington. us president biden claims he doesn't want conflict with china while simultaneously lodging would have been described as a tech war. again staging. correspondent, caleb, more pin brings as the story joe biden just met with top military leaders and he laid out his position in relation to china. we must maintain, as i said,

no turn around is group. we're making a clue. we don't see. conflict told, look, we're looking for competition members stitched of competition back, gonna be conflict, but we are going to compete. so just competition, not conflict. that's what joe biden says, but it doesn't look like friendly competition. when the united states is moving to crush china's ability to produce semiconductor ships, these trade policies are being called out as unfair. the reality is that the u. s. is determined to use microchips as a tool to contain china. there is no possibility of reconciliation. and what was nancy? pelosi is trip to taiwan is not an effort to provoke conflict. anything we saw us media cheering on and egging on the possibility of some kind of military confrontation resulting from it. now the u. s. a is piling all kinds of weapons

into taiwan. and there is a bill before the u. s. congress that would essentially renege on the one china policy. the state seems to be prepping its european allies for war, as well, urging them to stockpile weapons, and of course, purchased more of them from the united states. we hear from us colleagues, actually advice, invest in your own strategic enablers because there might come a time. and it could be pretty soon when actually we, the u. s. might be engaged fully elsewhere in asia pacific and we will be simply unable to support you. and as washington goes, so goes there allies. a poll now shows that 50 percent of those living in australia would be in favor of military action to defend taiwan. so while joe biden says he does not seek any confrontation or conflict with china, he simply wants competition. his actions tell us something very different and the result of those actions going to have dire consequences for the world. war is

a very intense thing. stop at twitter have reportedly admitted to trying to empower different social movements around the world. estimate a long muscular on going planned to purchase the company is donald court broke down the story for earlier in the studio with my colleague peter school. while the alarm musk pretty much walk to right through the front doors of twitters headquarters, a with a full sized porcelain sink in his hands. and he later posted the video on twitter with the caption entering twitter h q. let that sink in. so no doubt that was a publicity stunt to build some hyper on the fact that you learn mosque is set to take full ownership over the social media corporation on friday. but while he was there, he also rejected reports that he was planning to get rid of 75 percent of twitter staff. that what that he just said that was not true. and this was a statement he made just several days after we saw a group of twitter employees apparently write a letter,

pleading with eli must not to go through with these plans that was published on by time magazine. well that, let's say, thoughts a lot about how those possible layoffs could affects with his ability to quote the influence, the public. what exactly did he mean by that? the law. yeah. the, the word choice of the honors of this letter was definitely very interesting because alongside all these claims that ilan mosques, decision to lay off workers was, it would be reckless that it would be an act of work or intimidation. there was also a sort of tacit admission that twitter actively tries to influence people's ideas and political opinions around the world. let's take listen to what the letter actually said. elan must explain to lay of 75 percent to we to workers will hurt to with his ability to serve the public conversation to it to has significant effects on societies and communities across the globe as we speak. twitter is helping to uplift independent journalism in ukraine. in iran, as well as power as social movements around the world. i must cause previously

hinted thus stuff up, twits, i have a quote to strong left wing bias. do you think that's the case? don't? well, it would probably be better to say more accurate to say that they have an anti republican bias. after all, must made that statement. he pointed towards that bias, after twitter failed to censor a journalist who act openly called for violence against anti abortion conservatives on the platform. and of course, the biggest example of some sort of anti republican bias would be the platforms decision to completely banned the account of former republican president donald trump. so people have been complaining about one sided moderation on this platform for a while now. and that's likely something that's going to change if and when you on mosque takes control of the company or spain's prime minister has had better days. mistakenly referring to kenya than a gall twice on in front of the canyon presidents. this fe new. so shoot potential ally own many fields,

areas that we can work together and they go visiting us or kristen office and they go on really looking forward to working kennesaw opinion on karen gay televised event in nairobi, padre sanchez proclaimed his country's readiness to strengthen bilateral ties but there mistakenly cold can. yes, so they go and then repeated the plunder. shortly off that cooling canyon president william root over the president of senegal. his hosts laughed off the mistake briefly interrupting sanchez to correct him. a popular shooter video game franchise has raised eyebrows and it's that latest revision. ringback which players seek to kill a military general. he looks uncommonly like an iranian assassinated in an american drones joint. in iraq. the visual general brought

a copy the 1st 5 minutes, the new call of duty has you pilot, the missile that kills sola, money law. the new call of duty starts with assassination of general solar money to the player has to kill him in order to start playing. they have changed the name, but call of duty more than warfare to starts off with an assassination by miss all strike of the military figure who passed a striking resemblance to general cassim for the money the head of the wrong. the lead cause for he was killed in an as strike as baghdad airport in 2020. the installment is not the 1st the call of duty to have caused controversy in 2009 modern warfare to featured a mission titled, no russian in which players can participate in a massive shooting at a russian airport. while in 2019 a level called highway of death,

depicted russian soldiers as war criminals destroying a convoy on a fictional countries major highway. but in reality, the highway of death was a war crime committed by the us who attacked defense. a lucky soldiers trying to flee, wait during the end of the go for many people. it's another case of western media, inserting its political agenda wherever it con 5 mohammed mironda professor at the university of toronto, explains why the west choose is such a vehicle for soft power in western countries. what they try to do, both through the state and big business which are in bad with one another, is that they try to train the younger generation to teach the younger generation, to show hatred and contempt for those entities that are critical of western domination and western germany,

just like what we've seen in hollywood, just like what we've seen across the board in western western cultural manifestations. so this is nothing really new. this is to be expected. but i think that as the situation in the west, the period and as their fortunes decline, and as it becomes clear that their empire is failing, they will become more crude and more abusive in the way in which they picked the other, their own victims, the peoples that resist western imperialism and western domination, all the latest news updates. you can check our website, r t dot com. thank you for choosing our scenes national

a aah! on this addition of the program, we asked 3 questions. how was the conflict and ukraine likely to end? why does the west refuse to negotiate an end to the conflict? and how will the international order likely change as a result of the conflict in ukraine? when i was showing wrong, when i just don't a whole new world, yes, to feed out disdain becomes the advocate an engagement. it was the trail.

when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. ah ha.

there's a price on each native person for $5.00 for a piece of indian male $15.00 for women. $15.00 for children. they put me in a legal jail to call it a reserve is not part of canada. never decided so i was in school for 8 years. physician, terrible people it's impossible to forget what they're

ah we always put tobacco. we call dish. i wonder rock and it's a bit shaker rock. it, it's here and it's a big, big rock. and we call it a grandfather rock. we sank a grandfather for looking after us and taken care of us as we travel

they tried to tell us that this was savage. this was a pagan way of doing things here that's with the school. i was electrocuted twice. i was only 7 years old. first too high for me, so somebody put me in the chair and my feet, they're up can even touch the floor and they turn the power on electricity. then you can't. wendy electricity goes, you can like go.