i'm time to sit down and talk with him dominating the world. if somebody the west is put at stake and it's guy, but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody. and i would say a lot of americans stark assessment of quote the game against the world. and then speech at the annual session of the bow tie discussion. 6 the russian leader, address and number of global issues and information terrorist a u. s. senate candidate is blacklisted by ad for suggesting a diplomatic, a war. we spoke to diane clar herself i don't think it's, you know,

the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing these terms around information, terrorist laying the blame game as canadian police claims there were foreign actors involved in the truckers profiles last winter the nation security intelligence survey says no evidence of foreign invoices about we take a closer look at the story with moscow for the world. this is our to international. i merger blevins and these are the top stories, this our a bloody dangerous and dirty gang. that's how vladimir food has described, the west current international policy. he was speaking at the annual session of the valve. i international discussion club here in moscow where he address a number of major global issues. here are some of the highlights the consumer reserve, but the so called collective west them, it's a nominal term of course,

since is no unity there in the past few months is made a number of steps towards escalation, listening, miram dominating the world is some of the west has put at stake in its game, but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody. and i would say dirty up last night with a dispute issue using we are seeing not the systemic, but a doctrinal crisis of the american style, neo liberal model of world older. they simply have nothing to offer the world except for their continued had gemini, if a, when you're saying their prayer, today's universal rule to the west is to turn everybody into instruments used to achieve its goals. yes. and if anyone doesn't want to become such an instrument and they are targeted with sanctions, or even face organized coups. and if none of this works, the ultimate goal is to destroy them. a little oksana boy, gout host of ortiz worlds apart, brings as the main points of the russian president. speech is that main idea was

that the current arrangement of power in the world, in which western elite deemed themselves to be both the leaders of the world and in which they approach the rest of their world as a resource base. as something that is, i came to that old property was unsustainable, not only because the west failed and what it assumes itself to be that is the leadership. it's failed to address any number of global issues. bead climate change globally, the quality of food and energy prices. in fact, let me put in suggested that it was through the very short sighted policies, political policies of western and leave that those crises were exacerbated. but he went even further than this. he said that we have come to a point in mobile development and human development when countries around will no longer want to be held in servitude to the interest of the powers that be at

those interests. according to him. serv. not even the western societies, according to logic pollution, washington to leave everything that they do ultimately serves that own very, very narrow interest. and he believes that this is going to continue for some time . he predicted that the next decade is probably going to be one of the most dangerous decades since world war 2. nevertheless, he tried to reassure both the vol die audience. and i think global audience is that the russia understands this responsibility. and before the rest of the world, that it will act responsibly. first and foremost, as a, as a nuclear nation. he said that russia is interested in a fair and a piece will, will, than one way. and the major way of achieving that is through the respect to global diversity, he said that the benefits from the symphony of civilization from the symphony of

cultures and this sort of unification that the west tries to impose on the rest of the globe. arguing that its way is the only way, was not only abusive and disrespectful all other cultures, but also extremely exploited. if you said that right now, the world is prime for liberating itself from the old servitude of the western civilization. all the western power is because we good as soon as the benefits of globalization began to profit, not only western countries, but also major agent states, the west immediately change or even abolish the rules that with such arrogance has been in place in colonial times when they considered all peoples 2nd cause, but themselves today new centers of power are appearing takeisha or africa. yes, africa is a poor continent as of yet, but it does have great potential and look at latin america. all these countries

will continue that development. he also made a very interesting and repetitive point that russia was not fighting against the wasn't, wasn't actually even fighting against western elite. and that it, it had a lot of allies in the was specifically, was asked whether he has any message or, you know, ordinary people in western countries. and he said that yes, people in the west, ordinary people who do i need to know that russia is not there. and the me, a russia is not trying to take anything from them. it only wants to have the right to develop according to its own culture. according to its own vision, and in balance and fairness with other countries. geo politics expert pierre emanuel to mom told us that he believes the russian president speech has an offer of an alternative world order. are very interesting to hear, but benjamin put in,

emphasized on the fact that there are 2 type of, of west there is the west which is refusing or murky port richey. and it will neighbor to, to, to find a, come on the agreement with russia. but there is also in another west, the west, which is based on traditional values in europe. but traditionally her, the approach to society balance of power or for maintain no roots in the european civilization on this part of europe could thank you. negotiate an agreement with russia or visa nations. we which are part of a great a west, i would say. but to weaver, emphasizing a traditional value sovereignty balance of power between nations can or, or for it. now turn that motor to, we're newly pull our world and do a b,

e. peace and stability in the new mercury put our wall. so i think this speech a was a, a novel to europe. vladimir putin also raised his concerns over a possible dirty been false 5 operation by ukraine warnings which the west has repeatedly dismissed as false by ukraine has accused moscow of escalating its rhetoric on the potential use of nuclear weapons. the russian president, stress there would be no political or military gain from the use of such weapons and ukraine. ms. latina knows, it's no coincidence that we have published information from our security services that ukraine is preparing an incident with the use of a dirty bomb. this thing is very easy to make. we even roughly know where it has been prepared. the place where remnants of nuclear fuel are converted. ukraine has the necessary technologies for this. they can load it on to tosca. you blow it up somewhere and say russia, did it. russia launched a nuclear strike. we do not need this. there was no point in it. neither political

nor militarily. we do not need this. there was no point in it. neither political nor military. it was i who instructed defense minister sugar to cold old his colleagues and informed them about it. we cannot pass by such things as any table was laid him. russian defense minister survey showing you how the series of phone calls with his counterparts from the u. s. u. k. france and turkey on this issue. it comes after russian media published a report, claiming that the government in kiev was preparing a provocation involving a so called dirty bomb artes roman coast. europe has more russia's real novice denise agency claims to have a source that revealed the key if regime has already completed technical preparations for a provocation with a dirty bomb. according to their news release specialists from the ukranian rocket manufacturer, huge marsh, have prepared a replica of a russian is cancer,

a missile, which will be filled with radioactive material. the next step in the provocation will be ukraine, allegedly intercepting the rocket over the exclusion zone of the chernobyl nuclear power plant. and announcing that it was russia that launched it after the supposed doubting of the dummy rocket. the key of authorities intent to present to the world . it's fragments and electronic elements in order to convince the western public of russia's guilt. the source also claims that the replica model of these comes, are missile, was made on the basis of a projectile. from the tosca oh, missile system, russian authorities have been warding the world for weeks now that ukraine is preparing a provocation using a dirty bomb. but for now all calls to pay attention have falling on deaf ears, including in the un security council. meanwhile,

in the united states, a candidate for the senate has been blacklisted by the ukrainian government and call than information terrorist for narrative that flies in the face of washington's plans for ukraine. and i do want a better answer because the state department is funding it. i've been on the website for the center for countering disinformation, which has my name on the list and says, i am an information terrorist who should be charged with war crimes. and that does put me in danger. people on it have been attacked and killed. i got a package today in the mail that she had rattling noises in it that said something about ukraine, and i had to call the police because i didn't know what was in it. they are killing people. we spoke to diane sar herself an independent candidate for the us senate in this state of new york on what it felt like to be put on a traders list. so far as i know, knock on wood know,

american has been attacked in the united states on this list, but there is only about an hour from my office, a camp for a band arest youth. so i don't think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing these terms around information, terrorist things like that. senator schumer has refused to answer inquiries both from myself and a former un weapons inspector, scott ritter, were both new york state residents. were both on this list and rid or raised the question. given that i'm an opponent of schumer is this some indirect way of silencing me, at least for putting me in dangerous. we have a narrative which frankly is wearing thin in the united states. and i think. busy overwhelming sentiment in the united states is that this war must be ended

diplomatically with legitimate security concerns of both russia and ukraine addressed congress and the united states. frankly, as largely unaware of how overwhelmingly opposed americans are to our involvement in this conflict. and the more that we can get that message across to them, the more i think we have a chance of getting the policy changed. this comes as political consensus over 80. ukraine is under strain with midterm elections, fast approaching democratic party. congress members have attracted or recent letter urgent joe biden, to engage with russia and direct peace talks. the chair of the progressive caucus, the u. s. house of representatives. so the letter was a mistake paul show, though that american voters seem to be unwilling to buy the narrative, unlimited aid to ukraine, increasingly challenging politicians car like no man. no, no,

that's not the nuclear war. would you vote to send you the money to ukraine? i have every right to disrespect you because you're the one probably in a place with 80000000 ukraine data. also a 1000000000 target. read your right if a credit because you are funding neo nazis and ukraine, they are wearing the ukranian. they are wearing the black sun symbol. you say you want, i advance the black car. but you are funding the same people who you kill in the name of white supremacy. i could say, not only are we not changed our approach the cream, but we haven't seen any definition or any, any concern expressed by our allies and partners. either these democrats, as you know, that they pull the letter back or let them speak to, to their decision making. but we have enjoyed and continue to enjoy terrific

bipartisan support for our approach to ukraine. presidents not worried about that. the candidate for the us senate believes washington is out of touch with us voters . we have to cut the budget. we can't afford it. that's. i would be happy for that . but i would hope that people would have a more enlightened view that perhaps the united states should consider changing its relationship to the rest of the world. other nations being independent and developed should not be perceived as a threat to us. why is russia an enemy? who, why is the world defined that way? i think we have to take a step back and reconsider everything. perhaps the enemy of mankind is poverty, or the enemy as an asteroid that might corene into the earth. and we should, we should reorganize the entire thing the, the possibility of an accident when you have these nuclear drills being done by nato. and then the response from russia and the rhetoric that we see. and frankly,

the, what i would call a shocking lack of conscience in certain intelligence and military enclave is i don't know what to call them factions in the united states. i'm wondering where they say this is too much. we're gonna step too far. really. i think that they have somehow cut off from the people. they don't hear what people are saying and morning that that has to change. there is fair elections, which is also a big question in the united states. i think that it reads who nami is extremely likely, and unfortunately the parties tend to be unified on matters of war. but i think there is really a faction around former president trump that wants out of this conflict. you may have seen that congressman goes star from arizona actually offered to hold peace

talks. he sent a letter inviting both putin and lensky to arizona, saying that he said, i'm not a diplomat, but i can't sit by and allow this to continue. the last winter at the canadian convoy protests made headlines, and hundreds of checkers opposed. coven mandate. canadian police have claimed the foreign actors including russia, have been involved in the saga. the canadian security intelligence service, however, has allegedly painted a different picture. our keys fear is about takes up the story. funded by far right extremist, with russian influence. those were some of the claims suggested by the ontario provincial police about the protest led by canadian truckers in february against mandatory vaccination canadian pierre trudeau even invoked an emergency act stating a high level national threat posed by the protesters.

ah the block? the occupations are illegal. there are a threat to our economy. relationship with trading partners. ah. turns out canadian m p 's are now demanding answers the an inquiry as to why those claims on the security threat or widely different between what the o p p commissioner told the committee and march about the protests. and what it's had of intelligence recently said, on one end, the documents in a confidential police intelligence report warned that the freedom movement protests

were a long term security threat. and that foreign adversaries may have been behind the protest. previous reporting noted controversial political figures in the us voicing support for the blockades and ottawa, in windsor, and foreign funding of the auto a blockade. much of it from the u. s. the recent reporting regarding the possible use of bogus social media accounts by foreign actors overseas to promote the blockade. so just another external influence in domestic affairs. but the documents made public by the inquiry contradicted these statements with the director of the canadian security intelligence service c, as i s saying that there were no foreign actors financing the convoy in another report. the o. p. p. intelligence analyst had flagged an interview that an ontario and p p and convoy supporter gave to r t. r t. formerly russia today is reported to be a russian government control platform for directing disinformation at the west to

benefit the strategic foreign policy objectives of the russian state. but c, s i s, disagreed with the prevented all operational intelligence bureaus. view that the protest fit the minimum threshold to be labeled a potential national security threat. yet deputy m p. krista freelance that a dangerous president and froze bank accounts based on that claim using the unsubstantiated specter of foreign influence to quash legitimate public domestic descent. and when some republicans in the us raise their voices in support of the freedom convoy. they were accused by canadian politicians of interference themselves. we need to be vigilant about potential for an interference. whatever statements may have been made by some foreign official are neither here nor there were canadian, we have our own set of laws, we will follow them to stop the funds that are flowing in from the united states. very clearly, foreign interference. it seems like canada was looking for anybody to blame for an

organic public discontent with the current mandates and the expected scapegoat was, of course, russia given canada support of ukraine in this current crisis with russia a. i don't know if it's far fetched to ask but, but there is concern that russian actors could be continuing to fuel things. remember the freedom convoy? well, it has telegram channels in the collective audience of about $48000.00 participants . but instead of posting about trucks and vaccines, a lot of the posts are now saying stuff like missed this one please. student is invading ukraine to destroy us, run bio weapons law. and yes, we are t, we're later blame for covering this protest more than the mainstream media who are flat out ignoring the freedom convoy protests in favor of accusing russia or trying to tie it to neo nazis. even as canada itself continued funding ukraine's as of

extremists with weapons. and when a researcher analyzed the hours major for an outlet spec covering the truck, convoy over the course of $11.00 r t came out on top. so is canadian intelligence has admitted that neither russia nor the u. s. nor anyone else is to blame. who is now we're finally getting to a point where things like courts and other proceedings like the emergencies acting, where you can actually take a look back and evaluate what happened. i think the sudden, 1st of support we saw for the protest came from the fact that it came after 2 years of covey restrictions, 1st law downs than vaccine mandates. people lost their jobs, their livelihoods. and there was a lot of frustration that people felt like they weren't being heard. and i think what started as a proper convoy sparked that and became a focal point for that. for those feelings. in fact, this was just

a mass of grass roots protests by average canadians you as president joe biden claims, he doesn't want conflict with china while simultaneously launching. what has been described as a tech or against a shame. we must maintain, as i said, are military. but we're making it clear that we don't see conflict told we're looking for competition statistics, competition back, there may be conflict, but we are going to compete. so just competition, not conflict. that's what joe biden says, but it doesn't look like friendly competition. when the united states is moving to crush china's ability to produce semiconductor chips, these trade policies are being called out as unfair. the reality is that the us is determined to use microchips as a tool to contain china. there is no possibility of reconciliation. and what was

nancy? pelosi is trip to taiwan is not an effort to provoke conflict. anything we saw us media cheering on and egging on the possibility of some kind of military confrontation resulting from it. now the u. s. a is piling all kinds of weapons into taiwan. and there is a bill before the u. s. congress that would essentially renege on the one china policy. the added state seems to be prepping its european allies for war as well, urging them to stockpile weapons and of course, purchased more of them from the united states. we hear from us colleagues, actually advice, invest in your own strategic enablers. because there might come a time and it could be pretty soon when actually we, the u. s. might be engaged fully elsewhere in asia pacific and we will be simply unable to support you. and as washington goes, so goes there allies. a poll now shows that 50 percent of those living in australia would be in favor of military action to defend taiwan. so while joe biden says he

does not seek any confrontation or conflict with china, he simply wants competition. his actions tell us something very different and the result of those actions going to have dire consequences for the world war is a very intense thing to go further in depth on this. let's go live now to former us pentagon official, michael maloof. mike, it's great to have you on the program today. now, do you agree with biden's remarks that he doesn't speak conflict with china? i don't agree at all. in fact, the latest defense strategic pay for this recently come out lists. china is more dangerous than russia, and so that's, that's where they're beginning to put a lot of there. the u. s. just put in a lot of it's spending in and, and trying to concentrate more in the,

in the pacific region. in fact, australia is which it's a funny little country it's, it's always seeking attention and it's doing whatever it can to be one of the big boys and it has now linked up with the us to get nuclear submarines. and in order to patrol in that region and really upset france very recently when they turned down the conventional submarines that they, that there, they had originally ordered. so we see we see australia bite and the bit trying to get attention all the time. but you have others within the australia government who are say, look let's, let's have a little more dialogue with the chinese. japan doesn't want to is less inclined to go to war against china did once and really got spanked. and as a consequence, i think that it's,

it's the u. s. that's continuously priding this thing and, and driving everybody else to get engaged. and because it's the united states, the only superpower in the world, they all want to come on and make it an east west thing. we're seeing this constantly, just like with europe. i mean, it's unbelievable how we have absolutely cut the legs out from under the europe so that, that they've become more dependent on us. but what's happened is that our old infrastructure is not allowing for that. so how can we begin to fight a war? we try to em, and on what basis were per book right after right. after the fall of afghanistan, the united states immediately started playing the, the taiwan card and then it played the, the georgia ukraine card. and now look at the mess we're in. and conceivably, we can be fighting the 3 to 4 front war here pretty soon,

and we can even fight one. so i just, i think it's mindless. what's going on. it's all because of the, by the administration's directed policies to room, to show leadership and to compete with this eastern arise that has occurred that we basically driven them to, to enforce russia and china. they become much more allied with one another as a consequence. and it's the very thing they try to prevent. so it's just bizarre, that the logic, the thinking of the spider ministration. yeah, and you know, the us seems to have a few too many things going on right now. but speaking of the logic from the vitamin ministration or the lack there of when it comes to that competition with china, why do you think that they're specifically looking at the tech market? and do you think we're going to continue to be these escalations in the coming years? well, the tech industry is a, is a choke point for the chinese for their future. in 5th, 6 generation development,

for example, and they're pushing electronics very, very hard. and i, i see where russian china want to get together with in micro electronics development. but that is the for china, that is the, one of the major technology arenas for the future and whatever endeavor it has. i remember when i was at the defense department, one of the critical choke points for them in aircraft development was, was in the engines. and the hot hot the, the, the, the, the hot section technologies of the engines. they couldn't, there they, their engines were constantly breaking down. i think they've improved them significantly as a result of, of exports. they've gotten over time from the west. and they've learned from that and they've built their own base from which now they can further develop. that's

what the united states is trying to prevent. so if the competition of technologies and staying ahead in order to compete in one sense, but the by the ministration, is also very, very concerned with the develop with chinese development of its belton road of it's of its ability now to bring other countries together under the auspices of the shanghai cooperation organization as well as bricks and which china is a member and it's becoming and the united states sees that now as a threat. it won't talk about it, because biden has the chinese to have something on, on bite, and be honest with you. and i don't think that bite and wants to pursue that too far. but so they're going to focus more of their hostile intentions and what have you on russia, which is not as strong as china in, in the military arena a lot of moving.