ah, a with dominating the world is somebody the west is put at stake and it's guy, but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody. and i would say that the bottom airport and star assessment of quote the game against the world in a speech at the annual session. of all day discussion club, the russian leader address a number of global issues with an information terrorist, a u. s. senate candidate as blacklisted by p ad for suggesting a diplomatic solution to the frame. more research to diane far so i don't think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing,

please turn around information, terrorist playing the blame game. as canadian police claim there were born actors involved in the truck or protests. last winter nation security and tell it service says no evidence was found a foreign influence. we take a closer look at the story show of diplomacy and strained relation, india and china exchange awards of support as bilateral trade between the 2 powers cross is $100000000000.00 despite un results territorial dispute. ah, from moscow to the world, this is our t international. i'm rachel blevins, and these are the top stories, this our a bloody, dangerous and dirty game. that's how vladimir putin has described, the west current international policy. he was speaking at the annual session of the

vall, by international discussion club here in moscow, where he addressed a number of major global issues. here are some of the highlights that goes away in reserve, but the so called collective west. it's a nominal term, of course, since is no unity there. in the past few months is made a number of steps towards escalation. folks, listen and miram dominating the world is some of the west has put a stake in its game. but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody, and i would say dirty up us near the dispute issue in losing we are seem not a systemic, but a doctrinal crisis of the american stone, neo liberal model of world older. they simply have nothing to offer the world except for their continued had gemini at the, when you're selling their prayer. today's universal rule to the west is to turn everybody into instruments used to achieve its goals. and if anyone doesn't want to become such an instrument, they are targeted with sanctions,

or even face organized coups. and if none of this works, the ultimate goal is to destroy them with and joining me now to go further in depth on this is r t 's maria phenomena. maria, it's great to have you here in studio. now what were some of the main points that president putin made during his speech? good morning, rachel. yes, it has been a very long, almost 3 hours speech followed by another hour off question and answer sasha. and a lot of that was why reporting is harsh, merciless, sharp critique off the west. neo colonial had gemini policy, as the russian leader called the west library. potent sat is blinded by the same superiority in its aspirations, to rule and dominate the world. it imposes the rules of the game white more potent continued, and punishes all those who is disagreeing with that tend to illustrate the west is common and outrages policy of interfering in other countries. affairs like my

portion reminded everybody about the you as ordered. assassination. all the round top diplomat, they killed silly money on the territory of another state and said, yes, we killed him. why putting the cried question. what's world we'll leave a name. but he said that the situation is dramatically changing right now. as the west is losing its dominant power influence and trust and is quickly becoming quotation and minority on the global page. and therefore, it is in a very deep crisis because it is actually unable, he said to accept or meet or adjust to this new multi polar reality in which new centers of power are quickly emerging, global, especially in asia and africa. this is what, why my food i had to say when we good, as soon as the benefits of globalization began to profit, not only western countries, but also major agent states,

the west immediately change or even abolish the roles that was such arrogance has been in place since colonial times, when they considered old people with 2nd cause, but themselves today new centers of power appearing, take asia africa. yes, africa is a poor continent as of yet, but it does have great potential and look at latin america. all these countries will continue that development solution that why report know so kids the west of destabilizing the global situation in many spheres and in many parts of the globe here mentioned provocations and taiwan gas pipeline destruction, food and energy crisis. that why may put in repeatedly blames the west for speaking about conflict in ukraine. why put in called the civil war and said that the west is actually able to ended simply by directing the ukrainian government to seek peace. but they do not do that. why report and also claim that the west should

global finance system and that the dollar discredited. the world of finance reserves as dressing. but if the west is selling something to other countries, it admittedly request national production to stop and that kills local national economists and local producers. but the west partner continued does not care about that. it is only thinking about its own interest, benefits and profits. and this is why he said the use of national current is, should become at priority. and why wouldn't also said that we leave in a historic moment. and the next 10 years will be the most unpredictable dangers. but at the same time, the most important decade since world war 2 and in this literally hostile environments live with me said rushes, trying to fight for his tone, interests, and is actually get some support from around the globe. this is what he had to say rapidly, but western partners are doing everything to slander and humiliate russia,

to ignore it interests. and when we fight for our interest, opening and courageously. this very fact is contagious, attractive to a 1000000000 people on the planet. look, there are russian flags, many african countries now in latin america as well as in asia. we have a lot of friends and we don't need to force anyone. it's just that many leaders and citizens, a tired of living under external dic tat you later. but at the same time, what am i putting said the pressure does not fundamentally see itself as the enemy of the west, but it opposes the west attempts to impose strange valleys and other countries and in ratio as well. barbara said that the raw, at least, to west one, the west of traditional, primarily christian values. freedom, patriotism reaches culture. and this is something that russia is very close to, but there is another west aggressive christmas paula to neo colonial. that is used as a tool for new liberal leads why set and russia will never submit to the dominance

of the 2nd west. but at the end, why sad that he hopes that pragmatism will win and the west will be able to get back to the dialogue with the rest of the world. lot of important information. there are 2 maria phenomena. thank you so much for joining us and taking us through that speech. the focus of this years of all the forum and moscow, which president putin addressed was the outlook of a post hedge, a monic world guess from $41.00 countries attended the annual discussion club with the russian president, also taking questions in a 3 hour session. we spoke to a former member of the most open parliament who told us people in moldova to favorably on the prospect of talks with russia on key issues. young people to see what you see for you. i'll give you a figure from the surveys i've accessed with 85 percent of them, although the population support the countries constant and guaranteed neutrality.

85 percent agree that our president must come to moscow and talk to vladimir putin on a number of issues. including cooperation on energy. there's no alternative for moldova, other than to buy russian gas and much higher prices. that's because our authorities have to follow the western agenda, including the stance on the ukranian war and anti russian rhetoric. thus, we're cutting off any space for us to make any maneuvers latin america and also raised his concerns over a possible dirty bomb false flag operation by ukraine warnings which the west has repeatedly dismissed as false. the russian president, stress there would be no political or military game from the use of such weapons in ukraine. you know, it is no coincidence that we have published information from our security services that ukraine is preparing an incident with the use of a dirty bomb. this thing is very easy to make. we even roughly know where it is

being prepared. the place where remnants of nuclear fuel are converted. ukraine has the necessary technology for this and they can load it on to touch. can you blow it up somewhere and say russia did it? russian launched a nuclear strike. we did not need this. there was no point in it. neither political, no military. it was i who instructed defense minister showing it called all his colleagues and informed them about it. we cannot pass by such things michigan, yet this russian defense minister survey shows you how the theories of phone calls with his counterparts from the u. s. u. k. france enter kia on this issue. it comes after russian media published a report claiming that the government and he was preparing a provocation involving a so called dirty bomb. our cheese roman coast europe has more russia's real novice denise agency claims to have a source that revealed the key if regime has already completed technical

preparations for a provocation with a dirty bomb. according to their news release specialists from the ukranian rocket manufacturer, huge marsh, have prepared a replica of a russian is cancer, a missile, which will be filled with radioactive material. the next step in the provocation will be ukraine, allegedly intercepting the rocket over the exclusion zone of the chernobyl nuclear power plant. and announcing that it was russia that launched it after the supposed downing of the dummy rocket. the key of authorities intense to present to the world . it's fragments and electronic elements in order to convince the western public of russia's guilt. the source also claims that the replica model of these come, their missile was made on the basis of the projectile. from the tosca oh, missile system. russian authorities have been warning the world for weeks now that ukraine is preparing a provocation using a dirty bomb, but for now all calls to pay attention have falling on deaf ears,

including in the un security council. meanwhile, in the united states, i can left for the senate has been blacklisted by the ukrainian government as an information terrorist for expressing opinions that fly in the face of washington narrative on the ukraine conflict. and i do want a better answer because the state department is funding it. i've been on the website for the center for countering disinformation, which has my name on the list and says, i am an information terrorist who should be charged with war crimes. and that does put me in danger, people on it have been attacked and killed. i got a package today in the mail that had rattling noises in it. that said something about you crane. and i had to call the police because i didn't know what was in it . they are killing people. the website which the senate candidate mention works

under the ukraine defense council. the names of people who promote so called pro russian propaganda are published on the site. we spoke to diane's our herself on what it felt like to be put on a traders list. so far as i know, knock on wood know american has been attacked in the united states on this list. but there is only about an hour from my office, a camp for a band arest youth. so i don't think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing these terms around information, terrorist things like that. senator schumer has refused to answer inquiries both from myself and a former un weapons inspector, scott ritter, were both new york state residents. were both on this list and rid or raised the question. given that i'm an opponent of schumer is this some indirect way of

silencing me at least, or putting me in danger as we have a narrative, which frankly is wearing thin in the united states. and i think. busy overwhelming sentiment in the united states is that this war must be ended diplomatically with legitimate security concerns of both russia and ukraine addressed congress and the united states. frankly, as largely unaware of how overwhelmingly opposed americans are to our involvement in this conflict. and the more that we can get that message across to them, the more i think we have a chance of getting the policy changed. this comes as political consensus over age . ukraine is under strain with midterm elections, fast approaching democratic party, congress members have retracted a recent letter urging joe biden to engage with russia and direct peace talks. the chair of the progressive caucus of the us house of representatives says the letter

was a mistake. post show though, that american voters seem to be unwilling to buy the narrative of unlimited a to crane, increasingly challenging politicians. carla, may not, unless there's a nuclear war with you voted to send on weapons. why you the money to ukraine? i have every right to disrespect you because you're the 112, you inflated with 80000000 ukraine data. also a 1000000000 congress read your right if a credit, because you are funding neo nazis in ukraine, they are wearing the ukranian. they are wearing the black don symbol. you say you want, i advanced the black cars, but you are funding the same people who you tell in the name of white supremacy. i could say not only we not changed our approach to ukraine, but we haven't seen any definition or any,

any concern expressed by our allies and partners. either the democrats, as you know, that they pull the letter back or let them speak to, to their decision making. but we have enjoyed and continue to enjoy terrific bipartisan support for our approach to ukraine. presidents not worried about that. and earlier this month, i'm on my university, paul revealed that funding ukraine is not on the list of top issues in the us showing that american voters are mostly concerned with issues such as inflation and crime. the candidate for the u. s. senate believe that washington is out of touch with us voters. we have to cut the budget. we can't afford it. that's. i would be happy for that. but i would hope that people would have a more enlightened view that perhaps the united states should consider changing its relationship to the rest of the world. other nations being independent and developed should not be perceived as a threat to us. why is russia an enemy?

who, why is the world defined that way? i think we have to take a step back and reconsider everything. perhaps the enemy of mankind is poverty, or the enemy is an asteroid that might corene into the earth. and we shouldn't. we should reorganize the entire thing the, the possibility of an accident when you have these nuclear drills being done by nato, and then the response from russia and the rhetoric that we see. and frankly, the, what i would call a shocking lack of conscience in certain intelligence and military enclave is i don't know what to call them factions in the united states. i'm wondering where they say this is too much. we're gonna step too far. really. i think that they have somehow cut off from the people. they don't hear what people are saying and the morning that that has to change. there is fair elections,

which is also a big question in the united states. i think that it red su nami, is extremely likely, and unfortunately the parties tend to be unified on matters of war. but i think there is really a faction around former president trump that wants out of this conflict. you may have seen that congressman goes star from arizona actually offered to hold peace talks. he sent a letter inviting both putin and lensky to arizona, saying that he said, i'm not a diplomat, but i can't sit by and allow this to continue the last winter. the canadian convoy protests made headlines as hundreds of truckers opposed cobra mandate. canadian police have claimed that foreign actors, including russia, has been involved in the saga. the canadian security intelligence service, however, as now allegedly painted a different picture, are you fear,

isabel takes up the story, funded by far right extremist with russian influence. those were some of the claims suggested by the ontario provincial police about the protest led by canadian truckers in february against mandatory vaccination canadian pierre trudeau even invoked an emergency act stating a high level national threat posed by the protesters. ah the block occupations are illegal. there are a threat to our economy relationship with trading partners. ah.

turns out canadian m p 's are now demanding answers the, an inquiry as to why those claims on the security threat were widely different between what the o p p commissioner told the committee and march about the protest. and what it's had of intelligence recently said, on one end, the documents in a confidential police intelligence report warned that the freedom movement protests were a long term security threat, and that foreign adversaries may have been behind the protest. previous reporting noted controversial political figures in the us voicing support for the blockades and ottawa, in windsor, and foreign funding of the auto blockade. much of it from the u. s. the recent reporting regarding the possible use of bogus social media accounts by foreign actors overseas to promote the blockade suggest another external influence in domestic affairs. but the documents made public by the inquiry contradicted these

statements with the director of the canadian security intelligence service c. as i s saying that there were no foreign actors financing the convoy in another report, the o. p. p. intelligence analyst had flagged an interview that an ontario and p p and convoy supporter gave to r t r t. formerly russia today is reported to be a russian government control platform for directing disinformation at the west to benefit the strategic foreign policy objectives of the russian state. but c, s i s, disagreed with the prevented all operational intelligence bureaus view that the protest fit the minimum threshold to be labeled a potential national security threat. yet debbie m. p. chris or freelance that a dangerous president and froze bank accounts based on that claim using the unsubstantiated specter of foreign influence to quash legitimate public domestic descent. and when some republicans in the us raise their voices in support of the

freedom convoy. they were accused by canadian politicians of interference themselves. we need to be vigilant about potential for an interference. whatever statements may have been made by some foreign official are neither here nor there were canadian, we have our own set of laws, we will follow them the to stop the funds that are flowing in from the united states. very clearly for foreign interference. it seems like canada was looking for anybody to blame for an organic public discontent with the current mandates and the expected scapegoat was, of course, russia given canada support of ukraine in this current crisis with russia. a. i don't know if it's far fetched to ask, but, but there is concern that russian actors could be continuing to fuel things. remember the freedom con boy? well, it has telegram channels with a collective audience of about $48000.00 participants. but instead of posting about

trucks then back scenes, a lot of the posts are now saying stuff like, man, this one place news invading ukraine to destroy us run bio weapons law. and yet we are t. we're later blame for covering this protest, more than the mainstream media who are flat out ignoring the freedom convoy protests in favor of accusing russia are trying to tie it to neo nazis, even as canada itself continued funding, ukraine's as of extremists with weapons. and when a researcher analyzed the hours major for an outlet spent covering the trucker convoy over the course of one month, r t came out on top. so it's canadian intelligence has admitted, but neither russia nor the us, nor anyone else is to blame. who is now we're finally getting to a point where things like courts and other proceedings like the emergencies acting, where you can actually take a look back and evaluate what happened. i think the sudden 1st of support we saw

for the protest came from the fact that it came after 2 years of colby restrictions, 1st, last downs and vaccine mandates. people lost their jobs, their livelihoods. and there was a lot of frustration that people felt like they weren't being heard. and i think what started as a trucker convoy spark that and became a focal point for that. for those feelings. in fact, this was just a massive grassroots protest by average canadians by the chinese in indian officials have stressed the need to resolve differences between their 2 countries and to uphold the principle of non interference and each other's internal affairs. this comes as the stand off between china and india has simmered for more than 2 years. china and india are important neighbors to each other. we should be aware that the common interests of the 2 countries are greater than differences. personally, i'm

a big fan of india. we can work together more closely to solve economic and geopolitical issues. we never view india as a strategic rival or strategic competitor of china. the development of indian chinese relations is guided by 3 mutual agreements. peace and tranquillity, in the border areas is essential. the normalization of indian chinese relations as in the interest of both countries, both of asia and the world at large. meanwhile, bilateral trade has continued to boom, between the 2 countries raging over $100000000.00 in the 1st 9 months of this year . total trade between the countries is increased by more than 14 percent compared to last year during the same time period. and he has trade with china as been growing in recent years, without been shipments rising faster than imports. a large portion of imports from china include iron, steel, and mineral fuels. the bilateral relationship came under severe strain following

a deadly clash and the gao on value valley back in 2020 both india and china said they don't see conflict, but nonetheless moved thousands of soldiers to the region vice president of the center for china and globalization, victor gao thinks the indian and chinese economies can compliment each other. china and india complements each other to a very large extent. at present, the chinese economy is about $5.00 times larger than that of india. and going forward, i think india and china both can maintain very vigorous economic development. and the 2 economies can compliment each other to a very large extent. therefore, politically speaking, to promote peace and cooperation, and friendship between china and india is of utmost importance. it is encouraging

to see that even though china and india have not resolved their territorial disputes, the economic growth of their bilateral relations has continued all these years. and i do sincerely hope that the territorial disputes between the 2 countries can be resolved as soon as possible. through peaceful means. in contrast, the u. s. centers the china are escalating dismay president biden cleaning. he doesn't want conflict with beijing while simultaneously launching. what has been described as a tech war against china. we must be a group. we're making a clue. we don't see conflict told, we're looking for competition stitched of competition back to be conflict. we are going to compete. so just competition, not conflict. that's what joe biden says,

but it doesn't look like friendly competition. when the united states is moving to crush china's ability to produce semiconductor chips, these trade policies are being called out as unfair. the reality is that the u. s. is determined to use microchips as a tool to contain china. there is no possibility of reconciliation. and what was nancy? pelosi is trip to taiwan is not an effort to provoke conflict. anything we saw us media cheering on and egging on the possibility of some kind of military confrontation resulting from it. now the u. s. a is piling all kinds of weapons into taiwan. and there is a bill before the u. s. congress that would essentially renege on the one china policy. the state seems to be prepping its european allies for war, as well, urging them to stockpile weapons. and of course purchased more of them from the united states. we hear from us colleagues, actually advice,

invest in your own strategic enablers because there might come a time. and it could be pretty soon when actually we, the u. s. might be engaged fully elsewhere in asia pacific and we will be simply unable to support you. and as washington goes, so goes there allies. a poll now shows that 50 percent of those living in australia would be in favor of military action to defend taiwan. so while joe biden says he does not seek any confrontation or conflict with china, he simply wants competition. his actions tell us something very different and the result of those actions going to have dire consequences for the world war is a very intense thing. latest defense, strategic pay for the recently come out lists. china is more dangerous than russia. well, the tech industry is choke point for the chinese for their future in 56 generation development, for example, and they're pushing electronics very, very hard. that's

a very significant development and it puts the united states in the position then of trying to catch up. and then in the past we've always been in the forefront. so that's why the united states regards china is the greatest threat, not just economic, but militarily, if the competing sion of, of technologies and staying ahead in order to compete in one sense. but the by the administration is also very, very concerned with the develop, with the chinese development of its belt road of its, of its ability now to bring other countries together under the auspices of the shanghai cooperation organization. as well as bricks in which china is a member and it's becoming and the united states sees that now as a threat. and that's all for now. be sure to check out our t dot com for all the latest breaking news and updates. we'll see right back here

at the top of the hour. ah ah. hello and welcome across stock were all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle on this addition of the program, we asked 3 questions. how is the conflict in ukraine likely to end? why does the west refuse to negotiate an end to the conflict? and how will the international order likely change as a result of the conflict in ukraine? ah, i cross fucking the conflict in ukraine. i'm joined by my guess. got rid or in del mar, he's a former intelligence officer and united nations weapons inspector,

and tampa. we have larry johnson, he's a managing partner for a burg associates and a former cia analyst, and us state department counterterrorism official. and in philadelphia, we cross se erin, good, he is a political scientist historian and author of american exception empire and the deep state are gentlemen cross scrolls and effect. that means you can jump any time you want. and i always appreciate, scott, let me go to you 1st and del mar, i know we've been talking about this for months and months now, almost devoted every single program since the start of the conflict on the conflict in ukraine. but i think sometimes it's important to kind of step back and look at the very big picture here. so the 1st question is, i said, a mentor duction. how do you think does conflict in ukraine is likely to end? this conflict will, in, with a complete russian victory of that's the only possible solution. russia can tolerate nothing less than this, having engaged in this conflict to the level it has. russia cannot tolerate a situation that allows this ukrainian government as it's currently configured to

continue to exist and possess a military that's been empowered by nato, for the sole purpose of killing russians to have any anything other than the total defeat of the ukrainian government, ukrainian military means that russia is going to be fighting a forever war of attrition. and that's a strategic defeat for russia doesn't accomplish. it's primary goal in this conflict, which is to create the conditions for a new european security framework. i don't think russia wants a new european security framework that has empowered, emboldened ukraine, acting as a defacto natal proxy, right on its border. so the only way this conflict ends is, as russia has said, with all objectives of the special military operation met. that includes denies vacation, that's the elimination of this lunch government demilitarization, the total eradication of ukrainian military larry, the same question a central if i get it kind of can capsule with that we just heard from scott. i

mean, i've been saying all along is that russia cannot accept a compromise in which it will have to do this again in the next 5 years or the next 10 years. that's why there must be a definitive outcome. there's no win win here and somebody likes to say in the west, larry, i agree with scott that the bottom line is there's not going to be negotiated settlement. this is not going to end to diplomacy. i think russia has come to the correct understanding that there is no basis, no foundation for negotiating with the united states, north nato. they're not to be trusted entities. the issue though, is that russia is not fighting just ukraine. russia is fighting nato and was fighting the united states. and yet, natal in the united states have very, very limited military power. they can actually project. all they can do is,

you know, sort of like a drug pusher continuing to supply fentenol to some addicted attic like ukraine, and just continue to pump it in, hoping that they'll be able to come back and buy more product. but the reality is, ukraine's military capability has been eroded each and every day. it's not, we're not seen the, you know, the sudden arrival of fixed wing aircraft rotary way or improved missile strikes are a lot more artillery. we're actually facing the situation where even the ability of the west, the nato, to resupply ukraine is ended. so ultimately, how this ends, militarily, it will end up with the defeat, not just of ukraine, but the defeat of nato. yes, and that's what i think a lot of people nervous, and that's why they're so nervous about it here. essentially, the same question, there may be praise in a little bit differently. the binding ministration has already made it very clear that he believes it's unlikely that ukraine could ever win on the battlefield,

but they nonetheless continue to supply it with ample amounts of money in arms here . i mean that is very hard to twist your head around because that means a lot of ukrainians are dying and a lot of people are making money in the arms industry and the taxpayer is paying for it. i mean, so there's some, definitely winners and losers and that arrangement, if they can't win, why do they continue the conflict, aaron? well, in 1956, i believe it was. you had the uprisings in hungary, which were backed by cia and other elements of the u. s, and this ultimately why do a crackdown from moscow and the, the u. s. did not intervene. and as a result, these, this movement was crushed and it was used as a propaganda victory for the u. s. perhaps they are thinking that russia and that they can make some case for russian brutality after this, after this war and for propaganda purposes, it's difficult to say russia has yet to turn key into dresden as the, you know,

the british and the u. s. did to drive the world war to basically level the city with conventional weapons. it was russia would seem to have that capability at any moment, which makes it very strange conflict where the, the power imbalance is so vast on the saw in vastly in favor on the side of the russians. and but they have yet, they've been slow in the way that they've gone about this. i think that was a surprise to the us who is, but who and it's been spun a russian weakness, but i don't think that's really been the case. so i don't see how it is without a russian victory and less nato in the u. s. inter overtly, and which would lead to a nuclear war. so i don't see how a russian victory can be avoided the question as to what will happen if there's a lensky regime is still up in the air. and they could russia live with them still existing as a land locked basket can stay the question, i think russia could let deal with that quite easily because it will be use problem

. ok the you can take care of a bastard child called the new ukraine. i think that's what's going to be the result here. let me go back to scott here. nothing about ukraine without ukraine, that they love to say that. ok, but that wasn't the case. it's them, bull, i mean. and so, what kind of agency does lensky have in this situation? because it looks like any kind of neglect. we can't use the word diplomacy because diplomacy is to avoid wars. we're in a war right now. negotiations, but lensky said there will be no negotiations. i don't think he came up with that on, on his own scott. no. busy i mean, we, we know, april men in early april, the ukrainian government was in a position to, ah, least, have serious discussions with their russian counterparts about a diplomatic, off ramp from this conflict. russia was, you know, prepared to, you limit the scope and scale of its special military operation objectives. and in

exchange for, you know, the, the termination of this, of this conflict, a ukraine was prepared to discuss it and they were told by the west. no, because the west, i think in bolden bye is your is the your other guests indicated by the. busy the failure of russia to live up to the expectations of american military analyst has perceived the, the low key approach russia was taking as a sign of weakness. and so they said, oh, we can exploit this. and we can actually further our objective of stripping you train away. so we don't want to negotiated settlement that limits our ability or we want to expand this conflict. and so they shot down diplomacy. it began the process of a massive infusion of military assistance transform into ukrainian army into a de facto nato proxy of it. and this is set it up. so even now, when today we have a situation where the west is realizing, holy cow,

we're going to lose, we need a different off ramp to minimize to mitigate the consequences of this last ukrainians have double down. they can't negotiate a way out. there's no way ukrainian government live internally from a domestic perspective if they negotiated settlement that gave russia crimea, the bombast, care songs, upper asia, that just isn't going to happen. so there can be no negotiated settlement. only thing that's going to happen here is unconditional surrender on the part of ukraine . then. oh, fully nato will find a way to, you know, solve its own wounds in a responsible fashion. a not overreacting. don't let you go and go into it. and ukraine, or romania loanable dover, things of that nature. yeah. but then larry mean, what is the use of nato if it can't win against russia? because it was designed against russia. ok. that's why it's so it's existential for this useless, outdated alliance. ok. they made it out to be or not to be and it's their fault and

they're going to pay the consequences for larry. they are, they are a beta, operates much like fantasy war game or a video game in their own minds. they can accomplish a lot of things, but the reality is they don't have the, the true strength, the actual number of soldiers that they can move quickly to the front. the 5 are, i was sort of surprised this last week with cbs news coming out and touting that the 100 for board as well. media ready? ready to invade another playing? well, wait a 2nd. they arrived in june, so they've been there. they've been there at least 5 months. so now why all of the excitement and, and that boils down to the, the simple fact that with the counting the presence of the 100 and 1st year board, along with general david tre, us now to call in for some sort of multinational force modeled after what went

into a rock in 2003. these are signs of weakness and desperation because they realize nato kid, you know, the 404700 members of the 101st airborne, all they are as a lethal speed bump for the russians. russians will roll over them and kill a lot of americans. and it's not like the united states and germany and the u. k. have the 23400000 troops standing by that they could easily deploy nato's fixed wing aircraft ability to penetrate. rush, air spaces, nell rushes, anti or missile defense system is superb. the west has nothing compromise. so when you put all of this together, what, what, what you're seeing is that nato is beginning to recognize that it's just the white elephant. and it has no more relevance to the 21st century. but you know, the parallel as us on the eve of world war 2, the united states still had a horse cavalry, and a horse calvary was no longer,

no longer relevant to war. all right, gentlemen, we're going to go to a short break. and after that, frank will continue our discussion on the conflict in ukraine states with with in 2022. the italian government approved a package of military aid to ukraine, coordination with nature to help ukrainians defend themselves, and fight back about 150000000 euros. well, i make a weep, almost even atomic bombs are here in all the same naco and the you are with you on the want that people will die just for make money. the one that i have i have been yes, good there a while you months you got for if you go through and i she thought completed. i

mean, there's water or she thought if you need to be done to get them for the month is will buy more sir? me my show it bizarre tool or a for orfa zach leila. lesser opinion polls show that over 70 percent of italians are against military support for ukraine. i landed in confront with the date for that last or you flap don't a lot yet, lisa, and more on a skid out and go home and do not she then to the the daily dazzling w l. my last food boy, hello today because he's been a fool. he's and we're not running fun theater. the oh, when i want something wrong, when i just don't hold any world just to shave out.

disdain becomes the attitude and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. oh no one, no sir. no, no. hon was opener. little more realtor with ship unit 73. 1 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short and build the most powerful and most deadly biological weapons program that the world had ever. no. b. welcome across stock,

where all things are considered. i'm peter le belts remind you we're discussing the conflict in ukraine with okay, let's go back to erin in philadelphia. want to say with this, um the refusal to negotiate. aaron, i don't understand so much about this conflict coming from the west. doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever. huh. we and the entire, you know, this was an unprovoked attack in all of this ridiculous narratives that have come down. meaning that there was no pre history to any of this here. and i can't see how this not negotiating, not talking benefits. ukraine in any way, is matter fact they're then they're the ones they're going to be in the getting the short end of the stick. because yeah, nato will lick it's wounds, it's biden's war is biden's fall, but you know, it be the ukrainian people end up getting the short end of the stick here. because if you don't negotiate, then, then the russians have no reason to stop what they're doing. i mean,

i don't understand the logic here if you, if you crane truly is important to the west. go ahead. aaron. well, they're not really important to the west. i think it was henry kissinger who said it's dangerous to be america's enemy, but deadly to be america's for. and so what are why they negotiate? i would say, i'm assuming that nato is really the sovereign in ukraine, and zelinski knows that between nato and nazis or the neo nazis in ukraine, that are, you know, a minority, but a very violent and well armed intelligence connected minority that he doesn't have a lot of room to negotiate unless the us says so and can get it. he has some kind of protection. i think he, he had been told he could have negotiated peace with russia. he would have done that and been fine with that. that was the platform that he ran on, but yeah, it's a tragedy and the ukrainians are being slaughtered. and i don't see what the u. s. plan is long term. i tend to think more and more these days that the us actually

plans to lower the russians into invading ukraine and expected them to roll over, roll over them over all over the country like the us did in iraq. and that's sort of the gist of an intercept article, although they spin it in a different way. so perhaps the u. s. plan was to get them into some kind of afghanistan occupation, but i don't think russia really wants to occupy those parts of the bitterly anti russian parts of ukraine to begin with. so it's the u. s. seems to be just a string long. maybe hoping for some kind of gambit or miracle, that all reverse their fortunes, but it's hard to see what the strategy even is at this point. and the you can't seem to be be being led to the slaughter really? yeah, scott, you know, it's been mentioned before and in many, many programs. i've done this since the complex started, but it's very interesting how, particularly the americans, maybe the british, when they, when they analyze russians, military efforts in ukraine, they see it through the prism of shocking are they,

they can't seem to comprehend what the russians are doing. the russians are bogged down, they have no ammo, they have no morale, but they see it through the vice and maybe like, you know, and the, the 2003 war against iraq go ahead. i mean, it is, this is a huge problem in the west because we don't have an appropriate metric to do this. you know, and i have to admit, i was guilty of the same thing. when this conflict started. i was applying my experience from desert storm and saying i was mirror imaging, how we approach that conflict on to russia. what i knew were russia's military capabilities. what i didn't factor in was the history of the russian and ukrainian people. i didn't factor in that. you know, this is the equivalent of new york going to war against new jersey. yeah. i know, you know, new jersey girls marry, new york boys, new york boys, mary, new jersey girls. they have family, they have friends that lives communities and some of their war with one another and what you expected the role in there and kill them as if they don't matter of this

war has a, a psychological of reality attached to it because of that, the complex history and in between russia, ukraine that the west just doesn't get, we just don't comprehend that we don't know how to adapt our own prejudices about how war should be wage to this reality that this is almost in effect a civil war. yeah. between people who have coexisted peacefully, you scratch a russian, you get a ukraine, you scratch ukraine, you get a russian, we in the west, don't get it. we don't understand why russia isn't going in whole hog, because that's what we would do against the iraqis. because we have no emotional connection with the iraqis. but i'm telling you right now, new yorkers would not harm new jersey. the way we bond iraq, they would go in soft. they would say, we don't want to do this. let's work this thing out. the new jersey would feel the same way as ukraine in russia. i know the ukranian government is taking a very hard stand. i know that there's this a neo nazi element,

but the right don't hate ukrainian food. and scott is absolutely right here, because this is really what this is with injected into the, my don, this maryland anti russians element. ok. and very much supported by the west, by the way, that was their, their leverage to create this. they wanted to create an ethnic, they do it all over the world. by the way, for the 1st time, larry, i want to talk about for the rest of the program. i think we're all in agreement here, and i know my viewers are, is that scott said it right from the top of victory for russia. what does that mean for the international system? because i don't think the us is the and it's how it's going to take it to well, go ahead. larry. the system created in the immediate aftermath of world war 2 is dead. it just doesn't, you know, like a chicken running around with a check off. doesn't realize that it's dead, washington, london, or land, or much the same condition that started with the, with the imposition of the sanctions on russia and disrupting the international

financial order. once you remove russia from swift and swift is simply just a mechanism for communication between international banks, the incentive to set up an alternative financial system increase dramatically. and then when you couple that if you're trying to pressure and bullying, washington is trying to bring to bear on china, india, other large countries which actually do have some significant economic resources. even brazil. then the, the mechanism of staying within the old international order or the desire to stay with metal old international order evaporates. and you've now had both russia, china, india, brazil, south africa, working towards constructing an alternative financial order. that's number one. and now we're even seen signs of, from, from the russians of, you know, maybe we just need to walk out of the us. the u. n. has become

a useless organization from the standpoint of both russia and china. and once that happens, we have now completely destroyed the foundation that was the basis of peace in the aftermath of world war 2. so we're, we're on the, we're on raleigh, i think the threshold of a genuine multi polar world as opposed to this unit polar world. that we've experienced over the last 20 years with the united states writing. you know, we're in charge. yeah. but i agree with that, aaron. i mean russia, china, india, brazil can live with a multi polar world. ok. they've actually pushed for it. ok. can the west can the tolerate that because that that's for me, the biggest, if we look at, in the biggest picture, it's about maintaining western had gemini and that is of slowly seeping away. and, you know, a hedge mom doesn't like to see that happen if they can stop it. go ahead aaron. it may well be that the ukraine war is something like the suez crisis for the u. s.

empire. when the u. s. set out during world war 2 to establish a global empire after the war. it was all planned by wall street council on foreign relations. there was a position to that in the u. s. establishment in the form of the vice president henry wallace, who instead called for a century of the common man and this idea of a world world order governed by international law, generally speaking. and that would allow technology to be dispersed to the global south. former colonized countries at the time this they were still colonized. this was abandoned in favor of the american century. ok. so the century of a common man or is very similar to the idea of a multi polar world with national law. like what china has been proposing in recent years, and this may be what happens. it seems like europe is going to be devastated by the fall out of this, this conflict in ukraine. and it seems also like, you know,

the global south has every incentive to want to cut its ties with exploitative, neo colonial system that the u. s. has presided over since the end of world war 2. so henry wallace failed to establish this kind of world to carno, and the non align movement were picked off one by one over decades, or they just died or other things happened. but that, that failed those that attempt in the seventy's for a new international economic order garbage i was calling for something like this at the time of the around the time that the soviet union will dissolve. but it looks like there may be a shift to an actual multi polar world in the wake of this because the u. s. power is evaporating. and that's what makes it so dangerous that where the real risk is the the u. s. empire. that's why the u. s is risky, nuclear doomsday over ukraine, which is absolutely absurd on its face. again, scott, i can't let the progress of the 30 progressive democrats letter go, go unnoticed here. what do you think about that? i mean, never that supposed to be the, the moral, a bastion of

a true foreign policy, a middle class foreign policy. what a flip flop, what an embarrassment, what a shame, scott. and what an exposure of the, the reality ocean, the dissolution of the, the american singularity, the american hedge amman, look, these are people who no one ultimate truth. while their campaigns may be financed by special interests. therefore, they must have policies in place that a fee, the hand held that that makes the hand that feeds them happy. they get elected by the american people and the american people aren't happy with this current policy by large american people are drifting away from the notion of supporting ukraine with billions of dollars while we need help. the democrat, this letter was written because they saw the writing on the wall. they're going to get wiped out in the midterms. i. one of the reasons is because of the economy.

it's very difficult to explain to american people who what it further investment here at home, why we're giving billions in a wasted effort in ukraine. so they wrote a letter, they got ahead of the, on the head of their skis in terms of the white house. so they were slammed back. yea, you know, it's going to happen. you're going to get wiped out in the mid terms and other republicans who come in and the republicans known or to stay in power. it's not big that they have to be pro proven. it just add to an act policies that keep the american public happy so that they can get voted in the next time. and this is what the end of the american empire looks like. it's not going to be some muscular military giant running around the world. going crazy. it's going to be this slough slow death of the american people just saying we're done. we're finished. isolation as of, that's what we're going to see. i don't think you're going to be seen nuclear war be seen in, well, i don't think fingers crossed because these people have do very crazy things again, particularly recently. let's hope your prognosis plays out. are tillman. that's all

the time we have many. thanks them i guess in philadelphia, tampa and, and down are and thanks to our viewers for watching us here at r t c. and next time, remember across ah, [000:00:00;00] for oh, so abortion was illegal in the united states until the case of roe vs wade. i had an abortion, i am a mother today because i had an abortion in 2012 and that abortion saved my life. and we are here to fight for women's rights.

the constitution actually is no life and reward and children are persons. they should be afforded the right to life is every other person they shouldn't be murdered. just because mom thinks that can be murdered. the overturning of roe vs wade. well, it's a tremendous victory. it's historic victory. our role must be very clear. the health life of women of this nation. now at risk, look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings except where such order is a conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence at that point, obviously is to great trust,

rather than fear i would like to take on various jobs with artificial intelligence . real, somebody with a robot must protect its own existence with them dominating the world. is somebody the west has put at stake and it's this game is certainly dangerous, bloody and i would say dirty. that's what america and star assessment of quote, the west game against the world in a speech at the annual session of the val, by discussion club, the russian leader addressed a number of global issues and information terrorist a u. s. senate candidate is blacklisted by yeah. for suggesting