very dramatic and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successfully, very difficult time to sit down and talk with dominating the world is some of the west is put at stake in its game, but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody. and i would say in a wide ranging speech to the vol died discussion called vladimir putin critiques western foreign policy. which as he says, is responsible for recent global cry fees, including taiwan, ukraine, as well as the global food shortage and information terrorist us senate candidate is blacklisted by keir for suggesting a diplomatic solution to the ukraine war. we speak to diane say herself i don't

think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing things terms around information, terrorist new intelligence paints a very different picture of the canadian truckers unseat vaccine mandate protests last year. the bunking police claims that they were caused by foreign or even russian interference. we bring all the details later in the program. on the show of diplomacy amid strained relations, india and china exchange words of support that bilateral trade between the 2 powers across the $100000000000.00 mark. and that's despite the results territorial dispute with a very warm welcome see from the russian capital this friday morning. my name is peter scott taking over from rachel blevins and welcome to the program where be joining us for dinner and our, the dangerous and dirty game. well,

that's how vladimir putin has described the west's current international policy. he made those comments on the annual session of the vall day international discussion club writes here in moscow where he addressed a number of major global issues. harris. some of the highlights from that that goes away with that is open the so called collective west them. it's a nominal term, of course, since, as no unity there in the past few months, it has made a number of steps towards escalation. listening, miram, dominating the world is some that the west has put a stake in its game. but this game is certainly dangerous, bloody, and i would say dirty up us near the dispute issue in the living we are seeing not the systemic, but a doctrinal crisis of the american star, neo liberal model of world order. they simply have nothing to offer the world except for their continued had germany at the when you send their prayer, today's universal rule to the west is to turn everybody into instruments used to achieve its goals. and if anyone doesn't want to become such an instrument,

they are targeted with sanctions, or even face organized coups. and if none of this works, the ultimate goal is to destroy them. earlier r t 's, maria finacialow, that's all my colleague, rachel blevins. more about the key points of the russian president's speech. it has been an almost 4 hour sasha, and a lot of that was watermark pollutants. merciless, harsh critic of the west's neo colonial hatcher moni policy. this is how the russian president called it the west y report and went on hays, blinded by its own superiority and its aspirations to rule and dominate the world. it imposes the rules of the game warmer, put and continued, and punishes all those disagree with that. to illustrate the west common but outrageous practice to interfere in other countries affairs. why am i putting reminded about the u. s. ordered assassination off the top iran in general. they

killed so the money on the territory of another state and said yes, we killed him. why putting the cried question, what world we'll leave a nice, but he said that the situation is dramatically changing right now as the west is lose, and installment ends power influence and trust, and is quickly becoming quotation and minority on the global page. and therefore, it isn't very deep crisis, it is actually unable, he said, to accept or meet or adjust to this new multi polar reality. which new centers of power are quickly emerging, global, especially in asia and africa. this is what the library had to say because we could as soon as the benefits of globalization began to profit, not only western countries, but also major age in states. the west immediately change, or even abolish the roles. such arrogance has been in place since colonial times when they considered all peoples 2nd class, but themselves today new centers of power repairing. take asia, africa. yes,

africa is a poor continent as of yet, but it does have great potential and look at latin america. all these countries will continue that development. why report to know so kids the west of the lives in the global situation in many years and in many parts of the globe here mentioned provocations and taiwan, gas pipeline destruction, food and energy crisis. that's why we're putting repeatedly blames the west for picking about conflict in the ukraine. why my put and called it a civil war and said that the west is actually able to ended simply by direct teams, the ukranian government to seek peace. but they did not do that, why report and also claim that the west should global finance system and that the dollar discredited. the world of finance reserves. stressing that if the west is selling something to other countries,

it immediately requests national production to stop and that kills local national economists and local producers. the west flag report and continued does not care bought that it is only thinking about its own interest, benefits and profits. and this is why he said the use of national current is, should become at priority. and why wouldn't also said that we live in a historic moment, and the next 10 years will be the major, unpredictable dangers, but at the same time, the most important decades since world war 2 and in this literally hostile environment. why, said russia, he's trying to fight for its own interest and is actually getting support from around the globe. this is what he had to say rapidly, but western partners are doing everything to slander and humiliate russia, to ignore interest. and when we fight for our interest, opening and courageously, this very fact is contagious in practice, to a 1000000000 people on the planet. look,

there are russian flags in many african countries now in latin america as well as in asia. we have a lot of friends and we don't need to force anyone. it's just that many leaders and citizens, a tired of living under external dic tat. but at the same time, why don't represent said that russia does not fundamentally see itself as the enemy of the west. it opposes the west attempts to impose strange values and other countries and in russia as well. barbara said that the rock, at least to west is one the west of traditional primarily christian values. freedom, patriotism reaches culture. and this is something that russia is very close to. but there is another west aggressive personal paula to neo colonial. that is used as a tool for new liberal leads, why report and set and russia will never submit to the dominance of the 2nd west. but at the end, why sad that he hopes that pragmatism will win and the west will be able to get back to the dialogue with the rest of the world. well,

the focus of this year is vol. di forum was the outlook of a post hedge, a monic world. guests from 41 countries attended the annual events with the russian presidents, also taking questions in morrison. 3 hour session. earlier, we talk to our freeman, co director of the geopolitical economy research group. and he told us that the world is currently going through a period of change. i think the world is now to a big, huge turning point. i think it's, it's comparable to the, the opening of the last 2 was certainly comparable to the dissolution of the soviet union. my argument, which i'm trying to convince people of here, i don't know. i think people began to listen is that this is actually a sign of the weakness of the west. the figure i love that i gave was that in 197475 percent of the world's growth was a point with accounted for. but the united states 20 years later was 25 percent. now,

you might think that's because of the rise of china because the decline of america . so i did a 2nd calculation. what would have happened if the united states continued to grow off to $974.00, at the same rate as 1974? the answer is there would have been no change in its share of growth. so, did the actions of the united states. so being driven by its own internal decline, the only response it knows is to try and drive everybody else down. in order that it doesn't say hello there level. although the may putin also raised concerns over a possible dirty bomb, false flag operation by ukraine. and those are warnings which the west has repeatedly dismissed as false. the russian presidents dressed that there would be no political old military gain from the use of such weapons in ukraine. is latina now? this is no coincidence that we have published information from our security services that ukraine is preparing an incident with the use of

a dirty bomb. this thing is very easy to make. we even roughly know where it has been prepared. the place where remnants of nuclear fuel are converted. ukraine has the necessary technologies for this. they can load it on to tosca. you blow it up somewhere and say russia, did it. russia launched a nuclear strike. we do not need this. there was no point in it. neither political nor militarily it was i who instructed defense minister should go to court all his colleagues and informed them about it. we cannot pass by such things like you or the russian defense minister said geisha who held a series of phone calls with his counterparts from the u. s. u. k. france until kia on the issue. it comes up to russian media published a report, claiming that the government in keith was preparing a provocation, involving a so called dirty bomb. ortiz rome. acosta. have asthma. russia's real novice denise agency claims to have a source that revealed the key if regime has already completed technical preparations for a provocation with

a dirty bomb. according to their news release specialists from the ukranian rocket manufacturer, huge marsh, have prepared a replica of a russian is cancer missile, which will be filled with radioactive material. the next step in the provocation will be ukraine, allegedly intercepting the rocket over the exclusion zone of the chernobyl nuclear power plant. and announcing that it was russia that launched it after the supposed doubting of the dummy rocket. the key of authorities intense to present to the world. it's fragments and electronic elements in order to convince the western public of russia's guilt. the source also claims that the replica model of these can, their missile was made on the basis of a projectile. from the tosca o missile system, russian authorities have been warning the world for weeks now that ukraine is preparing a provocation using a dirty bomb, but for now all calls to pay attention have falling on deaf ears,

including in the un security council. meanwhile, over in the united states, a candidate for the senate has been blacklisted by the ukrainian governments as an information terrorist that's for expressing opinions that fly in the face of washington's narratives. on the ukraine conflict, i, i were i e with wow, there are, i do want a better answer because the state department is funding it. i've been on the website for the center for countering disinformation, which has my name on the list and says, i am an information terrorist who should be charged with war crimes. and that does

put me in danger. people on it have been attacked and killed. i got a package to day and the mail that she had rattling noises in it that said something about ukraine, and i had to call the police because i didn't know what was in it. they are killing people. the websites, the senate candidate mentioned works under the ukraine defense council. the names of people who promote so cold pro russian propaganda all published on the site. but we spoke to dan say a herself on what he felt like to be put on a traces list. so far as i know, knock on wood know, american has been attacked in the united states on this list, but there is only about an hour from my office, a camp for a band arest youth. so i don't think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing these

terms around information, terrorist things like that. senator schumer has refused to answer inquiries both from myself and a former un weapons inspector, scott ritter, were both new york state residents. were both on this list and rid or raised the question. given that i'm an opponent of schumer is this some indirect way of silencing me, at least for putting me in dangerous. we have a narrative which frankly is wearing thin in the united states. and i think the overwhelming sentiment in the united states is that this war must be ended diplomatically with legitimate security concerns of both russia and ukraine addressed congress and the united states. frankly, as largely unaware of how overwhelmingly opposed americans are to our involvement in this conflict. and the more that we can get that message across to

them, the more i think we have a chance of getting the policy changed. well, this all comes political consensus over 80. ukraine is the strain with midterm elections fast approaching democratic party. congress members have attracted a recent letter urging joe biden to engage with russia in direct peace talks. the chair of the progressive caucus of the us house of representatives said that the latter was a mistake. but suppose so though, that american votes seems to be unwilling to buy the narrative of unlimited h ukraine, increasingly challenging politicians. carla, now there's a nuclear war with you voted to send you the money to ukraine. i have every right to disrespect you because you're the 112, you inflated with 80000000 ukraine data. also a 1000000000 pounds of bread. your right if a credit,

because you are funding neo nazis and ukraine, they are wearing the ukranian. they are wearing the black don symbol. you say you want, i advance the black car where you are funding the same people who you tell in the name of white supremacy. i could say not only we not changed our approach the crime, but we haven't seen any definition or any, any concern expressed by our allies and partners. either the democrats, as you know, they, they pull the letter back or let them speak to their decision making. but we have enjoyed and continue to enjoy terrific bipartisan support for our approach to ukraine. presidents not worried about that. earlier this month, a monmouth university poll revealed that funding ukraine is not on the list of top issues in the u. s. so in the american voters are mostly concerned with this use such as inflation and crime. again, the candidates for the us senate believes that washington is out of touch with us voters. we have to cut the budget. we can't afford it.

that's. i would be happy for that, but i would hope that people would have a more enlightened view that perhaps the united states should consider changing its relationship to the rest of the world. other nations being independent and developed, should not be perceived as a threat to us. why is russia an enemy? who, why is the world defined that way? i think we have to take a step back and reconsider everything. perhaps the enemy of mankind is poverty or the enemy as an asteroid that might corene into the earth. and we shouldn't. we should reorganize the entire thing the, the possibility of an accident when you have these nuclear drills being done by nato. and then the response from russia and the rhetoric that we see, and frankly, the, what i would call a shocking lack of conscience in certain intelligence and military

enclave is i don't know what to call them factions in the united states. i'm wondering where they say this is too much, we've gone a step too far. really. i think that they have somehow cut off from the people. they don't hear what people are saying and morning that that has to change. there is fair elections, which is also a big question in the united states. i think that it reads who nami, is extremely likely. and unfortunately the parties tend to be unified on matters of war. but i think there is really a faction around former president trump that wants out of this conflict. you may have seen that congressman goes star from arizona actually offered to hold peace talks. he sent a letter inviting both putin and lensky to arizona, saying that he said, i'm not a diplomat, but i can't sit by and allow this to continue. in the news,

the united nations security council convened a meeting after russia requested a session to discuss the ledger u. s. biological labs in ukraine. kelly morgan takes us to the highlights of that meeting. the un security council was called, and russia presented all kinds of information and evidence regarding the biological weapons labs that are existing in ukraine. russia describe the activities of the ukrainian military and how there was talk of perhaps implanting diseases that could be transmitted by birds transmitted by mosquitoes and others. they went into great detail documenting the activities of these ukrainian bio labs that are done in coordination with the united states. how they are a threat to public health, how they violate international law. the representative of the united states dismissed all the evidence and all the claims put forward by russia as being untrue

without any explanation, simply arguing that because russia said it, it couldn't be true. now what was even more interesting is that in her remarks before the un security council, the representative of the united states went as far as saying that the united states has no biological weapons program. the united states does not have a biological weapons program. there are no ukrainian biological weapons laboratories supported by the united states. it is widely acknowledged by many voices and mainstream us medium that the pentagon here is involved in activities concerning biological weapons. however, we heard the representative of the united states completely flat out, deny that the united states is in any way involved with biological weapons or research involving the use of biological materials and biological agents for

military purposes. many countries spoke about why it is very, very important to make sure that biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction are not use. the representative of china. emphasize that de escalation and negotiation was the best way to move toward ending the conflict in ukraine, as well as talking about the importance of opposing biological weapons from the organ she did as a country who suffered immensely from biological weapons during world war 2. in china stands for a complete prohibition of weapons of destruction including biological ones. the information on biological military activity released by russia deserves the corresponding response by the party's concern. china's position on the conflict in ukraine is clear. we expect to cease fire and call on parties for negotiation and dialogue. however, the specific words of the u. s. seemed to just dismiss everything russia raised and to claim that russia was only bringing up these very, very serious concerns,

which they backed up with evidence. only bring it up to distract from russia's own alleged crimes. moving on now, last winter, the canadian convoy protests made headlines across the world of hundreds of truckers opposed. coven, monday's canadian police have claimed the foreign actors, including russia, had been involved in the saga boats. the canadian security intelligence service, however, has now allegedly painted a very different picture. ortiz fiorella, isabel takes the story, funded by far re extremist with russian influence. those were some of the claims suggested by the ontario provincial police about the protest led by canadian truckers in february against mandatory vaccination canadian pierre trudeau even invoked an emergency act stating a high level national threat posed by the protesters. ah,

the blockades and occupations are illegal. there are a threat to our economy. and relationship with turns out canadian and peas are now demanding answers the, an inquiry as to why those claims on the security threat or widely different between what the o p p commissioner told the committee and march about the protest. and what it's had of intelligence recently said, on one end, the documents in a confidential police intelligence report warned that the freedom movement protests were a long term security threat,

and that foreign adversaries may have been behind the protest. previous reporting noted controversial political figures in the us voicing support for the blockades and ottawa, in windsor, and foreign funding of the auto blockade. much of it from the u. s. the recent reporting regarding the possible use of bogus social media accounts by for an actors overseas to promote the blockade said just another external influence in domestic affairs. but the documents made public by the inquiry contradicted these statements with the director of the canadian security intelligence service c. as i, as saying that there were no foreign actors financing the convoy in another report . the o. p. p. intelligence analyst had flagged an interview that an ontario and p p and convoy supporter gave to r t. r t. formerly russia today is reported to be a russian government control platform for directing disinformation at the west to benefit the strategic foreign policy objectives of the russian state. but c, s i s,

disagreed with the prevented all operational intelligence bureaus view that the protest fit the minimum threshold to be labeled a potential national security threat. yet debbie m. p. chris are freelance that a dangerous president and froze bank accounts based on that claim using the unsubstantiated specter of foreign influence to quash legitimate public domestic descent. and when some republicans in the us raise their voices in support of the freedom convoy. they were accused by canadian politicians of interference themselves. we need to be vigilant about potential for an interference. whatever statements may have been made by some foreign official are neither here nor there were canadian, we have our own set of laws, we will follow them, need to stop the funds that are flowing in from the united states. very clearly, foreign interference. it seems like canada was looking for anybody to blame for an organic public discontent with the current mandates and the expected scapegoat was

course russia given canada support of ukraine in this current crisis with russia. i don't know if it's far fetched to ask, but, but there is concerns that russian actors could be continuing to fuel things. remember the freedom con boy? well, it has telegram channels with a collective audience of about $48000.00 participants. but instead of posting about trucks back scenes, a lot of the posts are now saying stuff like, man, this one place news invading ukraine to destroy us run bio weapons. and yes, we are t, we're later blame for covering this protest. more than the mainstream media who are flat out ignoring the freedom convoy, protest in favor of accusing russia are trying to tie it to neo nazis, even as canada itself continued funding ukraine's as of extremists with weapons.

and when a researcher analyzed the hours major for an outlet spent covering the trucker conway over the course of $11.00, r t came out on top. so it's canadian intelligence has admitted that neither russia nor the us, nor anyone else is to blame. who is now we're finally getting to a point where things like courts and other proceedings like the emergency acting, where you can actually take a look back and evaluate what happened. i think the sudden 1st of support we saw for the protest came from the fact that it came after 2 years of colby restrictions, 1st, last downs and vaccine mandates. people lost their jobs, their livelihoods. and there was a lot of frustration that people felt like they weren't being heard. and i think what started as a trucker convoy spark that and became a focal point for that. for those feelings. in fact, this was just a massive grass roots protest by average canadians and

finally, beijing's stress, the need to resolve differences between india and china, as well as so hold the principle of non interference in each of those internal affairs. this comes as the stand off between china and india has sim it for more than 2 years. china and india are important neighbors to each other. we should be aware that the common interests of the 2 countries are greater than differences. personally, i'm a big fan of india, we can work together more closely to solve economic and geopolitical issues. we never view india as a strategic rival or strategic competitor of china. india's foreign minister has said that piece in the border regions is essential for maintaining ties. meanwhile, bilateral trade has continued to boom between the 2 countries reaching over $100000000000.00 in the 1st 9 months of this year alone. so it's a trade between the countries has increased by more than 14 percent compared to last year during the same period. in the us trade with china has been growing in

recent years with outbound shipments rising fast and imports which make up large amounts of iron, steel, and mineral fuels. for the bilateral relationship came under severe strain falling, a deadly clash in the gull. one valley in 2020. both india and china said they don't see conflicts, but nevertheless moves thousands of soldiers to the region vice president of the sense of china and globalization. v to gal thinks the indian and chinese economies can compliment each other. china and india complement each other to a very large extent. at present, the chinese economy is about $5.00 times larger than that of india. and going forward, i think india and china both can maintain very vigorous economic development. and the 2 economies can compliment each other to a very large extent. therefore, politically speaking, to promote peace and corporation and friendship between china and india is of

utmost importance. it is encouraging to see that even though china and india have not resolved their territorial disputes, the economic growth of their bilateral relations has continued all these years. and i do sincerely hope that the territorial disputes between the 2 countries can be resolved as soon as possible. through peaceful means. money is peter scott on us, everything for this hour, but you stick with us for more. the highlights of the me, putin speech at the valve discussion club, which is coming up in just a few moments time. ah. with.