this is the program we asked 3 questions. how is the conflict in ukraine likely to end? why does the west refuse to negotiate an end to the conflict? and how will the international order likely change as a result of the conflict? and you create a new us defense strategy is that the possible use of nuclear weapons in response to non nuclear threats and information terrorist the u. s. senate candidate is blacklisted by key f for suggesting a diplomatic solution from ukraine war we speak to diane say a herself. i don't think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing, please turn around information terrorist. also on the program, new intelligence paints a very different picture of the canadian truckers empty vaccine monday process

debunking police claims that they were caused by foreign or even russian interfere with . thank you for joining us this friday afternoon. my name is peter scott bringing you all the latest news here not see from our headquarters in the russian capital. welcome to the program. that's what's up story, this our, the pence again, that has focused on nuclear deterrence and its newest national defense strategy unveiled on thursday. despite the president biden's previous pledges to restrict the potential use of nukes, the new strategy appears to do the complete opposite. we concluded a thorough review of a broad range of options for nuclear declaratory policy, including both for north, 1st use and sole purpose policies, and concluded that those approaches would result in an unacceptable level of risk.

in the light of the range of non nuclear capabilities, been developed and fielded by competitors that could inflicts strategic level damage to the united states and its allies and partners. r t 's. maria finacialow is joining me now live in the studio. maria, thanks very much for joining us. now. what can you tell us? what exactly is different about the potential use of nuclear weapons in this revised us? defense strategy is actually not that different because the u. s. is new defense strategy, in fact, does not rule out the use of nuclear weapons against non nuclear threats. it has been tamed. a controversial 1st strike policy that biden earlier suggested wouldn't be needed at a more. so apparently the u. s. president has changed his mind and pentagons new strategy. in fact, looks very similar to what i used to be under trump administration. interesting that the publication of this new strategy was expected. 6 months ago. it was postponed and we only saw it now published exactly after weimer putting speaking at

val di, discussion club earlier and thursday explicitly said no to using nuclear weapons. this is what library pollutant had to say which you when you go, then you go and we have never said anything about the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia, but only hinted at statements made by the leaders of western countries. liz truss. the recent u. k. prime minister told the press that britain is a nuclear power. it's the prime minister shop to use it. and she would do so. it's not verbatim, but close. she said, i'm ready for it. and no one reacted with the young woman is a bit out of her mind. how can one say such things in public school? so again, pentagon to answer to why roku, tim saying clearly that moscow is not considering the use of nuclear weapons. and by the way, whitehouse is early claims that he sees no indication whatsoever that moscow's prepare in a nuclear thread. the answer is this new strategy sharp and aggressive. and while

russia is always accused of pushing the world to r, maggard on the question is, actually, is it russia that is escalated the global situation? if he has no intention, why should keep talking to mike? why he talk about the in the use of tactical nuclear webber. second question. when he touched on this before you, your previous comments, marie, but how does this new strategy appear? it odds with joe bought his previous statements regarding nukes, a talked, there is actually a contradiction, a clear one. it's not just a reminder that the u. s. the only country on earth that unprovoked used the nuclear weapons in world history, but it is also a reversal of biden's 2020 campaign pledge in which he was saying that nuclear weapons sit online uniquely be ever used in retaliation or as a deterrent. their opinion that was last by progressive democrats and defense hawks

. here's what mr. biden had to say. then this. so to what extent must have you believe that many countries in the west appeared to be stepping up this certain nucleus? sabre rattling what appears to be almost a nuclear nuclear arms race. yeah, exactly. this is what we're witnessing right now, but we expect something different from the us. but what we see actually that r b are pushing towards this nuclear race. and for example, we are hearing from some sources within the u. s. diplomatic table that washington is speeding up its plans to upgrade nuclear weapons in europe. and with analysts 7 criticising the move as an unnecessary rush and asked for comment. pentagon spokesman answered, it is no way linked to current events in ukraine and has not sped up in any way,

but we know that it was expected. those deliveries are next spring, but now it is happening this december. so the rees is speeding up there and for what reason? we can't say clearing. we'll have to wait to see maria. thank you very much for breaking down the nuances of the updated u. s. defense strategy. thank you very much. sure. meanwhile, and staying in the united states, our candidates for the senate has been blacklisted by the ukranian government, us and information terrorist that's for expressing opinions that appear to fly in the face of washington's narratives. on the ukraine conflict. a me, i mean were i e with wow, this is the, i do want

a better answer because the state department is funding it. i've been on the website for the center for countering disinformation, which has my name on the list and says, i am an information terrorist who should be charged with war crimes. and that does put me in danger. people on it have been attacked and killed. i got a package today in the mail that she had rattling noises in it that said something about ukraine, and i had to call the police because i didn't know what was in it. they are killing people of the websites. the senate candidate was referring to the whigs under the ukraine. defense council are the names of people who promote so cold russian of propaganda all published on the sites where we spoke to diane say a herself on what it feels like to be put on a traits is list. so far as i know, knock on wood know, american has been attacked in the united states on this list,

but there is only about an hour for my office, a camp for a band arest youth. so i don't think it's, you know, the wisest thing to do if you're interested in security to start throwing these terms around information, terrorist things like that. senator schumer has refused to answer inquiries both from myself and a former un weapons inspector, scott ritter, were both new york state residents. were both on this list and rid or raised the question. given that i'm an opponent of schumer is this some indirect way of silencing me at least, or putting me in dangerous. we have a narrative which frankly is wearing thin in the united states. and i think the overwhelming sentiment in the united states is that this war must be ended diplomatically with legitimate security concerns of both russia and ukraine

addressed congress in the united states. frankly, as largely unaware of how overwhelmingly opposed americans are to our involvement in this conflict. and the more that we can get that message across to them, the more i think we have a chance of getting the policy changed. now this all comes as political consensus over 80. ukraine is on the strain with midterm elections fast approaching some democratic party. congress members have retracted a recent letter, which urged joe biden to engage with russia in direct peace talks. the chair of the progressive caucus of the us house of representatives called it a mistake. but suppose do show, however, this some american votes is due, seems to be unwilling to buy the narrative of unlimited a ukraine on the increasingly challenging local politicians. i. 4 the nuclear war, which you voted to send on with

my money to your group. i have every right to disrespect you because you're the one of your employees. you're with 80000000 to you pray. they're also a bill in progress. you're a hypocrite because you're funding neo nazis in ukraine. they are wearing the ukranian. they are wearing the black don symbol. do you say you might ransom black car, but you are bonding the same people? oh, you will kill in the name of white supremacy. i can say not only have we not changed our approach to ukraine, but we haven't seen any diminution or any, any concern expressed by our allies and partners. either these democrats, as you know, they, they pull the letter back, i'll let them speak to, to their decision making. but we have enjoyed and continue to enjoy terrific bipartisan support for our approach to ukraine. presidents not worried about that. and earlier this month, a monmouth university poll revealed that funding ukraine is not on the list of top

issues in the u. s. showing that the american votes is, are mostly concerned with other issues such as inflation and crime. the candidates for the u. s. senate believes that washington is out of touch with voters. we have to cut the budget. we can't afford it. that's. i would be happy for that. but i would hope that people would have a more enlightened view that perhaps the united states should consider changing its relationship to the rest of the world. other nations being independent and developed should not be perceived as a threat to us. why is russia an enemy? who, why is the world defined that way? i think we have to take a step back and reconsider everything. perhaps the enemy of mankind is poverty. where the enemy is an asteroid that might corene into the earth. and we shouldn't. we should reorganize the entire thing the, the possibility of an accident when you have these nuclear drills being done by nato, and then the response from russia and the rhetoric that we see. and frankly,

the what i would call a shocking lack of conscience in certain intelligence and military enclave is i don't know what to call them factions in the united states. i'm wondering where they say this is too much. we've gone a step too far. really i think that they have somehow cut off from the people. they don't hear what people are saying and that that has to change their fair elections, which is also a big question in the united states. i think that it reads who nami is extremely likely, and unfortunately the parties tend to be unified on matters of war. but i think there is really a faction around former president trump that wants out of this conflict. you may have seen that congressman goes star from arizona actually offered to hold peace

talks. he sent a letter inviting both putin and lensky to arizona, saying that he said, i'm not a diplomat, but i can't sit by and allow this to continue. just days after visiting russia, guinea, besides presidents, has become the 1st african leader to visit ukraine since the start of the war. both . while volume is lensky welcomed his counterparts with open arms. the form you create and didn't seem to be dismissive of such visits. on the same day as ukraine was visited by german president, russia finally has a guest to the president of guinea bas out. and the latter looked like he wasn't sure he took the right plane. the comments were made after the idea, putin welcomed president tomorrow c. so embargo to moscow where he discussed relations, various international issues and of course the situation in ukraine, independent african journalists, me o, d b madiba says that the former diplomats remarks are prejudiced for many years i can

speak of been seen as being sick and fast being sick and state compared to those of the way. so you are in any other parts of the africa, you know, and for me, just so it's been new and that's the problem that is facing you create and which is exposing and thought the lead it. so think of an ethical person very, very disgusting. i think those those comments essentially and yet i know the form of oppression was that can people being my keys in a jungle is about being but as if i'm not actually human. so i think those comments essentially, you know, i think the kilowatt people does enough to get you to be the expectation of people, you know, the other can come in what state and you're thinking towards and you're thinking relations of the nation. so i think the treat that the diplomat, she didn't show the form of credit. so the form of a prison and a form of hate was the african people beginning a bizarre president said he had done

a message from bloody him. if he didn't lensky calling for dialogue and said that because ready to participate in any possible negotiations, ukraine present, however rebuke the office of thoughts, calling it nothing more than rhetoric. i. busy i was in russia with president putin who asked me to forward you what we spoke about. something he thinks would be very important. he wishes and thinks that the direct dialogue should happen between your 2 countries. if the ukranian president and president putin think that guinea, besides, in africa can bring the solution for peace. we are the 1st to campaign for that feel which so far, all this is not happening. the desire of the russian president to speak. i think that this is nothing more than planned rhetoric, which should work on his internal audience and on the audience of those states that have not yet isolated politics between their country and the state called russia. zeniah bay king through presidents of the union of the african diaspora in russia, says that the west should pay more attention to africa's leaders and stop accusing

russia of meddling in his affairs. mammogram that i am as up and if you are in favor of the atlantic opinion, who are the western countries to accuse anyone of madeline in african affairs? they have been in africa for 500 years. so new players have emerged in the international arena and they don't like it. even though we can't call russia in u player because it is a direct successor to the soviet union, especially in relations with africa. but there is also china, which is also heavily invested in relations with africa. so speaking in intervening in african affairs, each country has its own interests, swore by africa is a large continent. it possesses many resources, not only natural, but also human. the west is afraid of russia coming back to the scale of the soviet union. so they are indeed worried about this and moving on now, burkina faso, new governments is to focus on securing the west african country, which has been ravaged by jihadist violence. earlier this month, president ibrahim tree, or a seized power from left tenant colonel poland,

re sunday. oh, good de amoeba. you later fled to tow go. the countries, new prime minister has said the nation remains on a war footing and called on locals to contribute to stabilization, where we talk to the streets or begin of vessels capital to gauge public opinion. we expect the government will be terrorism. we're going to trust them. there is a need for unity with the president who knows the battle ground, who says he's going to fight until his last breath. we trust him and we're going to support him. we need to wire in our corporation to look for other partners. lab, i am the commercial and we love the path. our prime minister has chosen. we will end this miserable situation. the decision to look for other partners is one of survival because for a long time, france was our only partner. many of our folks passed away, but france didn't help. don't arrazola. i believe that this prime minister will combat terrorism. there is no freedom if we have terrorists controlling our country,

security, prov, priority over government, prime minister, a polar there. kyle: and was enough clear because the security sufficient was bought that me by organized out of the beginning of the year, his ability. and because how would he believes that beaver was fairly hair on $50000.00 gold? 2 would be a group to serve in the army as auxiliaries was, and we will. odyssey work at un security council convened a meeting of russia's request to discuss a legit us bio labs in ukraine, where russia's ambassadors, the un presented new evidence on the subject. little really little, nobody mean your she's going to do it for a long time. russia has repeatedly expressed its concerns about biological military activities. carried out with direct the system some participation of the u. s. military and the board of trees located in former soviet republics. far from the

north american continent and close to the russian border, this constitutes a direct threat, the biological security of the russian federation. throughout the special military operation, we obtained a number of documents convincingly proving the true nature of interaction between the pentagon and ukraine in the bio military sphere. and analysis of these materials indicates noncompliance by the united states and ukraine of the biological weapons convention. un security council was called, and russia presented all kinds of information and evidence regarding the biological weapons labs that are existing in ukraine. russia describe the activities of the ukrainian military and al, there was talk of perhaps implanting diseases that could be transmitted by birds transmitted by mosquitoes and others. they went into great detail documenting the activities of these ukrainian bio labs that are done in coordination with the

united states out. they are a threat to public health, how they violate international law. the representative of the united states dismissed all the evidence and all the claims put forward by russia as being untrue without any explanation, simply arguing that because russia said it, it couldn't be true. now what was even more interesting is that in her remarks before the un security council, the representative of the united states went as far as saying that the united states has no biological weapons program. the united states does not have a biological weapons program. there are no ukrainian biological weapons laboratories supported by the united states. it is widely acknowledged by many voices in mainstream us medium that the pentagon is involved in activities concerning biological weapons. however, we heard the representative of the united states completely flat out,

deny that the united states is in any way involved with biological weapons or research involving the use of biological materials and biological agents for military purposes. many countries spoke about why it is very, very important to make sure that biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction are not use. the representative of china emphasize that de escalation and negotiation was the best way to move towards ending the conflict in ukraine, as well as talking about the importance of opposing biological weapons from, from the organ. and she did as a country who suffered immensely from biological weapons during world war 2. in china stands for a complete prohibition of weapons of destruction including biological ones. the information on biological military activity released by russia, deserves the corresponding response by the party's concern. china's position on the conflict in ukraine is clear. we expect to see fire and colon policies for negotiation and dialogue. however,

the specific words of the u. s. seemed to just dismiss everything russia raise and to claim that russia was only bringing up these very, very serious concerns, which they backed up with evidence only bring it up to distract from russia's own alleged crime. and finally, a recent report claims that finland co host some of nate, those nuclear arsenal, if it joins the alliance that's as russia's again accused by the organization of dangerous nuclear rhetoric. president putin is sailing on the battlefield. he is responding with more indiscriminate attacks on ukrainian cities against civilians are against a critical infrastructure on with dangers nuclear rhetoric reports in finish, newspaper ill toleta says it's sources work in quote foreign unsecure to policy and

states that the new government bill would allow nato to base nuclear weapons in the country, a finland has remained neutral since world war 2, and has been highly critical of nukes it's, it was also one of the 1st countries to sign treaties, limiting the spread of such weapons. that report comes the hot on the heels of an online report from politico which alleges that the u. s. intends to upgrade its main nuclear warheads hosted on european basis the reports which claims to be based on u. s. diplomatic cable says that delivery was originally planned for the spring, which is now his schedule for december agnes, norberg, director of the global network against weapons a nuclear power in space caused a news. horrifying. i think that this mo, the is it comes from the united states of america or the we were not even allowed to assign the tree one needed to abolish

nuclear weapons. this is horrifying. sweden has been one and even thin land have been most against nuclear weapons. i am not sure that it is sweden, actually, because this is hidden and never discussed in public. i think that hiding these from the public, as they do is the only way to accomplish this dangerous mold. i think it is absolutely wrong to say nick, rush from hedge to use nuclear weapons. first last the latest news from around the world. and that's all for me, peter, scott. nick aaron will be in the hot seats on the top of the hour and feel free to head over to our website for the latest in the meantime. thanks for watching.

ah ah ah mm

hm. mm. i to business with. mm hm. boss. with you. i finished with i did miss steward with key at the ocean. just keep a bruce this to the dealer. michael, could you please give us a little bit? it was a new i spoke with of guys, just opponents in the full claims issue. i need video with watching your supplies, superficial, lithium door prevalence, zavala, but yet they use a school. ah

oh, you're a baby with a baby so you can go with a baby so you can have freedom to go. you sacrificing? no. you sacrificing a baby convenience. has nothing to do, it has nothing to do with a a man . so abortion was illegal in the united states until the case of roe vs wade made its way to the supreme court in the early 19 seventies. jane row was not

her real name. there was a woman before her that was known as jane doe. she dropped out of the case. the 2nd woman was jane row. she was pregnant and wanted an abortion, but abortion was outlawed. so she filed a federal law suit and it went through the entire federal court system until finally the supreme court ruled by a vote of i think it was 7 to 2 that a woman has a constitutional rights to privacy. now this, these words right to privacy, opened a door that just changed american society because right to privacy meant a right to have sex with whoever you wanted in the privacy of your own home. so sodomy, laws were overturned, it was a right to have an abortion. it was a right to to be gay. all these cultural laws that we had were thrown out in, in the ro versus we decision. and then abortion clinics opened all around the country

. some states were able to put a cap on abortions in that you could have an abortion if you work less than 3 months pregnant or less than 6 months pregnant after 6 months, only if the woman's life was in danger. i had an abortion. i am a mother today because i had an abortion in 2012 and that abortion saved my life and was the one act of kindness that i could give the child that was not driving inside of me. i'm choosing to terminate that pregnancy meant that that growing fetus had a dignified end to their life. i'm sorry, go what your child diagnosis. oh, yeah. so my son was diagnosed my son had a congenital disorder that was causing all of his joints to fuse and extension. so as he grew in my uterus, his bones were breaking, and my uterus couldn't support

a growing fetus that wouldn't end. i was on trial here at the time and because of the federal ban of the fan and federally funded abortion, despite 3 health care providers saying my health is at risk that i could die carrying this pregnancy. my insurance refused to cover it. so we were forced to travel out of state to find a place where it was affordable, and i'm very grateful to the people of new york who helped take care of me in that time. but it's not the dignified way a person should be able to access their health care. so there's a lot of change that needs to happen now. so if you have a big i, i'm here because women bodies are their own and they should have the right to do whatever is best for them. and this is taking away more than just the person. this will lead to more serious consequences. i think the supreme court like very our, our balance in this country and we don't have that balance right now when you have it is not speaking for the american.