is the reality of what we're facing, which is fashion with the headlines right now here and also you international. russia says here the tax and the black c a responsible for putting it in to the ukranian great deal reached in july. i'm also gonna quit the agreement off the key target is naval ships, with drug inflation has just pretty much come about from nowhere before the head of the use central bank. it says all time high inflation and the euro's own has literally come out of the blue, but it does take them. i went to blame most of it on russia. also ahead for you in this program, trying to take a report. the u. s. is planning to build

a base for its b, $52.00 bombers in australia with beijing warning it could trigger at arms race with the government kind of surgeons from the northern take right region, hold their highest level peace told since the civil war there erupt, it nearly 2 years ago with very well welcom do from all of us here. it all t international in moscow, straight tia top stories right now. so moscow says that a key as a recent attacks in the black sea, what's put a stop to the ukranian grain deal. the comments came during the un security council session, currently in effect right now in new york. moscow pulled out to the agreement in response to a recent large scale ukrainian drone attack against it ships. a key, if an anchor put in place a transit plan for 16 cargo ships, as we understand, one of them has already been granted. passage of the security inspections keeps

attack on the black sea fleet puts an end to the humanitarian dimension of the assembled agreements. the black sea grain initiative should not be carried out without russia's presence. we are surprised that the un did not condemn calves attack on the ships of the black sea fleet. lamazzo requested a un security council meeting monday. it's, as i said already, in effect right now, it is following allegations to the ukrainian drone attack used the maritime grain, cordova cover, rushers defense ministry says the intelligence obtained from the wreckage of the drones shows a path of travel through the lanes originating ultimately from the port city of odessa, latino at donald court has been taking a closer look at what many calling the conflicting attitudes towards the great deal and recent developments surrounding outrage among western leaders. as russia halts, compliance with a un agreement that was supposed to secure grain deliveries for countries in dire

need. it's purely outrageous. it's going to increase turbo ation. there's no merit to what they're doing. the u. n. negotiated the deal, and there should be the end of it. rushes decision to suspend participation in the black sea deal puts at risks the main export route of much needed grain and fertilizers to address the global food crisis caused by its war against ukraine. the e u. urges russia to revert its decision, but listening to just one side of things doesn't provide the whole story for months now, rush has warned that the grain corridor deal would be untenable if the west and especially kiev didn't hold up their end of the bargain. and what happened this week, a drone attack on russian ships defending the grain corridor, allegedly carried out by ukraine with the help of british intelligence. taking into account the act of terrorism, committed by the key of regime with the participation of british experts on october the 29th this year, against the ships of the black sea fleet and the civil vessels involved in the security, the grain at corridor, the russian sy suspends its participation in the implementation of the agreements

on the export of agricultural products from the ukrainian ports, although ukraine's leadership hasn't confirmed or denied involvement. and the attack key of did to find the time to accuse russia of blackmail for its decision to suspend the agreement. but that's the recent attack is not the only reason moscow decided to back out. according to you and statistics, the majority of grain being exported under this deal has gone to high income countries. only about 3 percent has gone to places like somalia and sudan, which are on the brink of a food supply catastrophe. it should come as no surprise that russia thinks it's outrageous to be criticized for suspending a deal that isn't even fulfilling its established purpose. washington's reaction to the terrorist attack on the port of savannah, i suppose, truly outrageous. this happened because of the reckless actions by the ukranian authorities. as for the insinuations about provoking hunger, we would like to remind you of our repeated calls to sent food shipments. first of all, to countries in need, instead, however,

a good half of all carriers under the green deal went to developed countries for some cargoes 60 to 100 percent, went to e u countries. these are not the states that are experiencing a real problem with food, taking into account that russia has been and remains a reliable partner and is ready to provide the world with the necessary amount of food. our country is ready to supply the poorest countries with up to half a 1000000 tons of grain free of charge. the west's apparent failure to back up its words with action has already led to moscow drawing wider conclusions about the future of co operation with the west. it is becoming obvious that any food deals should be concluded without the participation of the west, including its mediation, read, speculative price setting, and with affective international control of supplies to the countries in real need . russian ships are attacked as they attempt to defend the agreed upon corridor. the west essentially turns the deal into a grain import scheme and russia as the bad guy for suspending the deal. the logic

here is questionable to say the least will, despite the western countries of founding, the alarm of a global food crisis over 6000000 pounds of ukrainian grain. when 2 developed countries from august talk tobar this year. that while nations facing extreme hunger received just over a 1000000 tons of grain of winter, and all of that number less than half a 1000000 tons went to the poorest countries in africa. earlier in the day, my colleague neal discussed the grain crisis and recent developments in the world with the head of the bricks. international forum, a per nima non here in this junior ford security is very important issue for the world. and recently we saw that it was a cv food crisis and ukraine and reshay's, a big lead producer and some other agriculture products, the noise for that and they are supplying too many countries. but during sanctions, this deal is very become very important because in july you do negotiation with

united nation 30, it was decided that the 218 ships will go to the united nations security council and from their new date. but now this is saying that few couple of days before they don't attack on our never ship in premium. so they suspended the dean. and it is i thing that to which countries are in need they should take this need. it should not be stored by united nation. we're downs. so need is important security. so i hope the nation is stake is right. and it should be transferred to the needy countries for people who need it the most. get it 1st. yeah. you mentioned that you could asian and african nations know clearly realizing

that the importance of her own resources which the west has wanted for quite some time. i will this realization change international business, the global picture as a whole. just, you know, western countries utilize their natural resources in multiple fords. ok, and now they're having scares of the natural resources like the observing that in london. i know the guy is, is happening in italy. people are not able to pay the electricity bills. so this kind of crisis i'd happening because they don't have natural resources. so they are depending on other countries like russia and so the to be in countries. so this is very important that this. busy important to alliances need to work in proper shape and another month, another record, and you will inflation in europe,

reaching a new all time high. in october it's nearly 11 percent across the entire european block. energy is the biggest component of the inflation, but food prices are rising fast. meanwhile, the european central bank cheap said the record breaking increases came out of nowhere, but moscow should shoulder much of the blame. inflation has just pretty much come about from nowhere. we had been fighting deflation and then as a result of very speedy recovery, plus the energy crisis caused by mr. put in, who's decided in an unjustifiable way to invade another country. yes. and to put it, you know, in off kale lost a lot of chaos. yes. yeah, and that's what he's trying to do as well, you know, to cause kills and to destroy as much of europe as he can. no one force the union to sanction its own energy supply. bam. take that. couldn't remember that? well, it blew up right in their faces. the, you broke up with russia committed,

howard curies for ukraine by jumping straight off a cliff with the citizenry strapped back. and this is all such blatant nonsense from la gabbert. it's quite frankly, therapy for someone in her position with her background because long before christine gammon was president of the p and central bank. and she was friendship. connie minister, under a former french president equinox that was made so she would have had to look no further than the website of the french central bank with which she intimately familiar, and which pointed out in october 2021. that inflation had quote, risen sharply from the start of that year. the boat this call attributed that inflation, which had already had a 13 year high a year ago, to quote tensions between supply and demand following the reopening of the world economy. in other words, the heavy handedness of european union and world western leaders in micromanaging everything during the cold. a crisis adding out stimulus checks like hallow, candy,

it all completely deregulated their economy. now the front central bank also site quote, energy transition policy. so basically, europe ideological push towards green energy as a factor that would cause the price of high carbon energy like gas and fuel to rise well into the future. again, they said that last year like this now try to absolve western release of any responsibility for their self make crisis by blaming russian president vladimir putin. and here's how she describes him. and he had this sort of flashing freezing lies. so that's what i'm saying, that just just terrifying aspect about him. anybody who is behaving in that way has to be driven by evil forces which is terrifying. not quite as terrifying as some of legalities, policies on those of her colleagues, but tries. she might log out is not likely to fall the average citizen who is well

aware that their bills went off a long before the conflict in ukraine, and they still keep rising with inflation now at 10.7 percent across the u. so here are some folks from palermo, italy explaining how they're coping. they don't pay separately, no money to leave the house with one price and returned the next day, and it's another every day changes. so if you go shopping with a plan and end up with you, or i can send you expected i only by the necessity serrano but it has everything. seems strange to me when i see the exponential increase in prices. i realize that transport costs have risen, and as a result, prices have risen, but not to such an extent, in my opinion. you know, big another good, blue light gas and spending all rise day by day. is there anyone who can live on the minimum pension as it is? how do you keep going like this when i miss you wonder legality and her colleagues even here, these people? brussels engineered this, this crisis and just keeps tinkering with it. she had interest rates 3 quarters of

a percentage point yet again last week in an effort to break inflation. and that despite some block opposition concerned about the impact on growth. as long as the e. u is blindly willing to keep doing whatever the us wants, washington's own interest, 1st and foremost, while its citizens are destined to suffer while their elite just keep trying to shift the blame. it looks like she may have been out of downing street for just about a week now, but less trust is certainly not out of the headlines. former u. k. prime minister has found herself in another scandal. several british media outlets reporting her phone was hacked when she was the foreign secretary under bars. johnson is claimed she had to change her personal phone number when she became prime minister because it was compromised. daily mail source even claims the phone had to be placed in a locked safe inside a secure government location. and the messages obtained by the hackers reported included trust as discussions with senior foreign ministers about the war and

ukraine. or many other details of the hack remain unclear. it's already been blamed on russia by the media list just became the shortest serving british premier in history office. she resigned from the post just 44 days into the job. let's learn more crossing live. now it's a journalist option returns to here on the program. actually, great to see you a very good evening to a, you know, it never, never rains, but it always pours for poor old lives. she can't really catch a break can she? if she thought she was going to sit quietly into a corner after the bottle of a premier ship, it seems the media has other ideas. what do you make of a hacking story? action cor, old liz rory and getting sentimental in your old age? clearly, i should just say that the subject of security let alone the former prime minister, disgrace prime ministers i phone use as opposed to the proper use of g, c, h, q, m, i 5 in my 6 phones is being discussed right now, because maybe we should be saying poor richie soon act is

a home secretaries in big trouble at the moment, giving some kind of speech. but in the british media that everyone is now interested in whether richie sex choice for the person that runs and my 5 and my 5, the own security secret services should resign, which would be the 1st calamity for this government as regards personnel. but as to the story that you mentioned, i should say the british government in response to the newspaper report in of i can't draw the me as a daily mail newspaper already opposition. m p. 's asking, why was it leaked to the daily mail at this particular time? when within the story, it says, it was covered up by senior civil service and former disgraced prime minister boris johnson. british government says you the u. k. as robust systems in place to protect against cyber threats, including regular security briefings for ministers. this comes as the follow up to the story suggesting that liz trust was using an unsecure line and i phone some

would sympathize with a given, as i say, the g. c. h q phones apparently rubbish. and she likes to instagram a lot. there is a bombshell speculation about kim dot com. the legendary security analyst has a 1000000 followers on twitter who claims that it was not a phone that was act. it was being backed up on to the icloud, and there are suggestions completely unconfirmed. i've tried to reach out to him for further confirmation that she texted or messaged anthony blink and joe biden's, hapless secretary of state, saying it's done shortly after the worst environmental catastrophe of the century. the terror attack on the north street pipeline supplying energy to much needed energy to germany for inching your is interesting. you bringing the other kim dot com angle. i do advise anyone who's curious to, to take that further and have a good read into what he would be saying about it. and it's certainly he,

he's an authority when it comes to hacking or internet piracy. you name it, that guy. certainly a bit of an authority on this kind of stuff. i was gonna ask you though, you know, actually when it, when it comes to, when it comes to the blame game here, a cynic might argue that this story, the, they, the, they're the hacking of a phone or ha, disclosing information accidentally. perhaps it's a convenient way to, to devote public attention for a while when, when you got all these new problems facing the new prime minister, do you think there's anything to that? absolutely. news management is a constant feature of the government. we know that from diaries of johnson and already there's a autobiography or some sort of biography that said to be rushed out about the list, trust premier ship, even though it only lasted 40 odd days. but, you know, britain is a country with no freedom of expression, no press freedom, they close down channels. as we often say, they torture journalists in britain. so news, even despite all of that news management is crucial. so the fact that there's drugs

that phone has had to be put in a safe at one point according to these newspaper reports, is by the boy in comparison to much more, much more terrifying revelations that we may not hear about it in terms of confirmation for 50 years under the 50 year rule, if that as to what kind of dirty tricks are being used by the british at this moment. i mean, it took, you know, seymour hersh to tell us about syria. it took her, some of the gracious journalists, or for the 20th, and really for centuries to give us a glimpse of how dirty of the tricks being played by britain or we know is on the surface that britain has been there pouring arms into kiev. does not want to have negotiations, i'm sure the negotiated piece of a ukraine and has a history of the past few decades of killing, wounding, or maining,

or displacing tens of millions of people from iraq, afghanistan, libya, and syria. let's try to keep it on the u. k, after my last question, i mean from your perspective at the moment the situation in the u. k. the brand new prime minister, it is the situation they're gonna get any better. do you think? i think her, the war is the foremost in the minds of those in parliament. at this moment. they are debating new ways of attacking russia. some would say that that shows how out of touch, the members of parliament are the people of britain. perhaps the majority are looking forward to a winter where suffering is going to be the order of the day. and rather than war, if anything they might prefer some kind of negotiation as regards a war in europe, the foreign policy is not top of their mind even though of course foreign policy is what is affecting their lives in the britain is choosing many analysts believe to sanction itself and heard its own population. $20000.00 on

a good year. some would say, i say that with tragic irony. 20000 die in the winter. in britain, the poorest, the most vulnerable. how many? tens of thousands will day this winter because of richey, synnex government journalist option return to joining us here. live without international. always good to see. thank you. for my u. s. president donald trump is colby, a hammer attack on the husband of the how speak and nancy pelosi, a terrible thing. but he attributed it to a rising crime rates and what he called democrat run cities. at the assault came after a number of democrats were highly critical, of republicans were failing to reign in a rise and violent rhetoric. yeah, was paul pelosi, that's a terrible thing was all of them. it's a terrible thing. look at what's happened to san francisco general look a wood shopping in chicago. it was far worse than afghanistan. well,

as soon after the incident or the democrats branded the assailant a trump supporter, but a number of questions had been raised in the media about the case. at the moment the intruder broke into a house or even didn't break into the house, was not caught on camera. while police body cameras were suspiciously switched off . or surprisingly, someone opened the door to the attacker. and there was no security in the house despite nancy pelosi being the 3rd most powerful person in america, added to that the politicians husband was reportedly calling the intruder by his name and even called him a friend. that's according to police. on friday last week, the 42 year old intruder attacked policies, husband paul, a wealthy businessman, and a stock trader with a hammer. now some reports say that he reportedly been looking for policy herself and was said to be repeatedly calling her name. however, she was not in san francisco at the time. her husband needed surgery for a head injury and the police say the attack it will be charged with attempted homicide. a late at the white house press secretary linked the assailant to the

capitol hill protests from last year. the thing that is probably the most haunting he was, he was yelling out the things that we heard during january 6, which is where is nancy? well, let's take this further crossing, now live to lie. i know the media legal, honest from new york. great to see you line on that before we get into the attack itself. the white house is suggesting that the assault on pull policy is somehow that during an interview, how do we know what we know? how do we take the information and extrapolate and interpolate from that? you know, medical school students are always taught, taught that when you hear hoof beats think horses, not zebras. so we're going to these. i old examples of where this comes from. now. it is reported, let me say, 1st of all, i know nothing about what happened other than what i hear in the news. and that should tell you every which means i know nothing. we don't know when you think it

depends upon who we're talking, whom we're, we're speaking with, unless i'm talking to the arresting officers and get to see the information. i'm just speculating. but let's just work on this. it is a ledge. let's assume argue window that this was correct, that the assailant said, where's nancy? where is nancy? meaning nancy pelosi, ostensibly, it was reported that on january 6 during the insurrection reservation, or the revolution or whatever this, this trespass event was that either some or all said wears nancy as he walked into the capitol. where, where are these and initial? where's nancy? where's mike? pence, where's whomever? so the, the white house spokesman said, i am suspecting nat at her own suggestion, but perhaps she think, ah, because he said, where is nancy? this mimicked and reflected that shibboleth, that, that call to arms. you know,

that was said. now i've got to say, oh, come, i mean tell you about come on line. oh, i mean i'm, i'm with you on this, i'm with you on this. but let, let us, you know, look, we're seeing a lot of strange facts or a lack thereof going on with his case as an awful lot of speculation. some of it not fit to print. and for example, the hillary clinton tweeted out a message saying that she thinks this hammer attacker was clearly a mega supporter than elan. musk responded to hillary clinton saying actually there's more to it than you think. he quickly deleted that tweet. but listen, there are all sorts of allegations going around the i've got no confirmation on a lot of this, but so you know, the police are portly, said that pull. pelosi was referring to the hammer, a taca as a friend. there are some that speculated actually they were lovers. there's an awful lot of strange things. they even some people saying that the doorway that was smashed in was smashed in later. and the idea that this guy was calling for nancy pelosi that was added in later to be a part of the story that so much conflicting stuff right here. but what do you

think happened line or what do you think? well, the 1st thing is, as a former prosecutor, i will tell you that this man was savagely attacked. whether this was done initially by some can sensual ron de lord tryst or whether it was a burglar. either way, we've got a guy who was clobbered and is in the emergency room. that's that. but let me ask something that i heard tangentially from friends of mine in the business. the 1st thing i want to know is why words the camera device is that all police officers have. why weren't they activated? why don't we get to see and hear what this person said? now remember, whenever this happens, the 1st thing that you must do is you must say, in an abundance of caution, to protect the rights of the assailant. it is not a good idea to release this information. okay. yeah, yeah, yeah,

fight. but that's question number one. number 2, this was bill the police response as a welfare check in that means here that the police were said, ostensibly not under a 911 or an emergency call, but instead to see if every one's okay. sometimes we have a, an elderly parent will asked the police to do or welfare check to go by and see if everything's okay. that's very interesting. and the reason why that's interesting, some say welfare check versus an emergency response than the information that is gleaned may not be subject to freedom of information or public disclosure because it's not a criminal investigation. that's very interesting. so i 11 to know specifically what was the nature of this call, who calls as a friendly welfare check. hello. yes, i could you come over and check on me i, i no, so i'm,

i'm just guessing. what's also interesting to note is look at and this is the most important, and i will tell you that whenever you have somebody who is, let's just assume out of their tree. they tend to say things that are, are debtor, consistent with lunacy. and it may be of a religious bend, it may be political. so what we do now is those individuals on the left as we say, are looking and calling and perusing everything he ever said. and if there's anything which is pro trump pro maga pro, whatever you say, aha, that is the reason now, interestingly enough, simultaneous to that. and in addition to these statements, he made statements regarding leftist leanings in the light. those have been, interestingly left out in the country to day. if you want to shut anybody down,

just say that what they are saying, their belief, their bases are a conspiracy theory. that's it. it's the dog whistle. it turns off all inquiry. and that's what's going on now. well on, i think you could make a few good points to have a pool flow. so you know his where he of you having he's having a bit of a bad time as of late. you remember his a d u i driving where he crashed his porsche? oh yeah, of course allegations of are inside a trading. and now a hammer attack. according to the song reports he told police of the person who attacked him was a friend. so there i think there are some seedy details we're not getting that are not getting to see the light of day. lionel media and legal analysts who always enjoy a company. thanks for joining us. thank you sir. ah, china is warning of a potential arms re softer in australian t. v. investigation revealed us plans to deploy up to 6 nuclear capable. b, 52 bombers in northern australia. the relevant us behaviors have increased regional

tensions seriously undermined regional peace and stability and may trigger and arms race in the region. the investigation by australia's ab ctv claims washington plans to house the bombers at the tyndall air base south of dall when the capital city of the northern territory. the u. s. also reportedly plans to build its own jet fuel storage tanks and an ammo bunker at the side and a project costing up to a $100000000.00. as we understand all the work is due to be completed by the end of 2026. well, we asked for a comment on the reports about the deployment of b. 52 bombers from the pentagon and the australian defense ministry. we'll let you know what we hear back. meanwhile, no separate military development. japan says it's considering increasing the range of his new high speed missile, which is still under development beyond $1000.00 film of his government sources set . it's in order to have better defend its remote islands, but the mover would put the coastal areas of china and north korea with in range.

while the director of the center, if a counter hedge, a monic studies a tim anderson says people in australia, certainly some of concerned a conflict between the u. s. and china could break out. it's really a terrible ha development, which is scaring a lot of people who stride it, no matter what they political persuasion, because they know that china, which is non threatening to australia and which is the straight as largest trading partner, has been for some time. it's an impossible task to step into a conflict with a pow that big and for no real reason. and unfortunately it's being done simply because.