of host lower with regard to joe by imposing these sanctions on russia has destroyed the american economy. so there is your boomerang self. ah, we have pledged to guarantee security. if you create attacks, these vessels, we will be to blame and accuses key of opposing a threat to that black sea weak corridor. as moscow expresses concerns over ukraine, abusing the un brokered weak deal for military attacks. also ad on the program today, south africa as president lashes out the u. s. embassy for causing panic about a terrorist attack potential on that never occurred. china warns all of a potential arms rates pushed forward by washington that says the u. s. reportedly

plans to deploy 6 nuclear capable b, $52.00 bombers in australia with around the clock across the globe. this is our team from the team and myself, you know, lead hello, and welcome to the program. russian president vladimir putin has clarified that the country is not quitting the ukrainian grain deal, but only suspending it's participation. it came about because of security concerns following a ukrainian drone attack on the russian navy tools, the new rules. they pose a threat both to our shifts, which must ensure the safety of the grain exports and to civilian vessels that are engaged in this, we have pledged to guarantee security. if you crate attacks these vessels, we will be to blame. every one is now talking about what russia is doing without

thinking about what has led to this, the creation of a threat to this humanitarian corridor. russia also focused on the issue during a un security council meeting, the accusing key of a triggering the halt with a recent grown attack on a russia naval base in the black sea. with moscow. further notice that the safety of shipping along the corridor cannot be guaranteed until ukraine commits not to use it for military purposes. our teeth kill up not then takes us through the main points of the heated discussion of the un tickets on the the meeting took place and we heard from you an official describing the grain deal, the fact that it now suspended the impact that'll have on the global economy on the price of grain globally cetera. then from there we did hear from the russian representative ambassador and then the took to the floor in the security council chamber, and just laid out the facts about why the actions of ukraine using the corridor for

military purposes. the recent attack has forced russia hands, and the deal is now suspended. this was not russia using. this is a response to action from ukraine that were carried out with the support of the wet . this is what he said. kim's attack on the black sea fleet puts an end to the humanitarian dimension of the stumble agreements. the black sea green initiative should not be carried out without russia's presence. we are surprised at the un did not condemn kim's attack on the ships of the black sea fleet. now there were some voices at the security council chamber who did speak in support of what russia said, referring to this attack as essentially an active mirrors are preventing moved from being distributed, violating agreements. now we heard from the united states and their usual ally to ignored what russia backs russia presented, and simply proceeded to demonize russia as they usually do in meetings of this type, claiming that everything russia does is somehow a conspiracy theory. every threat of evidence that russia has presented is somehow

all fabricate. not going into any detail, and that we not acknowledging the fact that russia brings before the council, the typical actions and words of the usa and their allies before the council. however, there was a moment of optimism that we did see which was we heard un officials announcing they will be conducting an investigation of the attack on the blacks. the fleet was present. it would indeed be a grave abuse of the black sea grain initiative. if it were used in any way for military operational advantage, united nations has the solemn privilege of assisting the parties to implement this unique arrangement. acting as a secretariat, the u. n. is ready to investigate along with member states, party to the initiative. any and all evidence, if requested quite a day at the un headquarters in manhattan. let's remember this very building that

house the, the un security council. we also posted the world food program and all kinds of n g o. the hands that are responsible for dealing with the situation regarding world hunger. so the day in that very building, we had the un security council of 15 member body that leads the united nation reconvene to discuss the aftermath of an attack on a humanitarian corridor. and candidate for enabling food to be bored and graham. i'm just returning to the russian president speech on monday. he also calls the sabotage, have been nord stream pipeline system, a quote, terrorist attack that's after russia was finally allowed to examine the site of the explosions. a full month after the damage was done. the question is sitting, the skunk of cielo renewed his desk. prom has been allowed to examine the explosion site on the north stream pipeline systems. there were 2 craters, 3 and 5 meters steep. a pipe 40 meters long was ripped out of place, bent at

a 90 degree angle and hurled 40 meters to the side. in the direction of the nor trained to pipeline which was also damaged by the explosion and fragments of that pipe. bruce, this was clearly a terrorist attack. it is difficult for us to maintain control over this part of the system because it's within the territory of the special economic zone of denmark, sweden and germany. extra to achieve some background to the explosions on the nord stream pipelines occurred on september 26 than were quickly declared as sabotaged by both the west and russia. an international investigation was launched, but moscow was denied participation in it. russia claims that the u. k. was involved in the attack and accusation london has dismissed. former pentagon security analyst, michael maloof offered his thoughts to r t on why sweden and denmark did not initially allow russia to inspect the site of the north stream pipeline explosions. and the 1st impression that comes to mind

is that they may have been involved or some special forces may have been involved. you cannot rule that out and it just doesn't make any logical sense for russia to, to damage or, or destroy its own pipeline. so, and there may be other entities involved and those, those countries may be trying to hide through the real culprit is from the west. i mean, you cannot buy deduction. it had to come from the west, and i suspect it was either great britain or the united states to they're never going to admit it. and we probably will never know for sure. i think it's reason why we, it would be good for russia to go down and, and check it, check and investigate its own on its own. and to, to see if they can find any evidence as to who might have been involved.

ok, let's turn to another of our headline stories today. china is warning of a potential arms race push forward by washington. after the merge that the u. s. is plumbing to deploy up to 6 nucular capable of b, 52 bombers in northern australia. the relevant us behaviors have increased regional tensions seriously undermined regional peace and stability and may trigger and arms race in the region. the investigation by a st in a b. c. television network claim, washington is seeking to how is the bombers of the tindle or a base south of darwin, the regional capital of the northern territories. it said the project will cost upwards of $100000000.00. all the work is true to be completed within 4 years. well, we got to comments on the deployment of the b, 52 bombers from the pentagon. they say they rotational presence of us or a craft in australia. is part of the 2 states cooperation,

also highlighting the pentagon school investment and commitment to australia. well, the director of the center for country hedge a monic studies thinktank of tim anderson says that people in australia are concerned that a military conflict could break out between the u. s. and china. it's really a terrible development, which is scaring a lot of people who strike no matter what they political persuasion because they know that china, which is non threatening to australia and which is the straightest largest trading partner, has been for some time. it's an impossible task to step into a conflict with how big and for no real reasons. and unfortunately, it's being done simply because of the dependence of successive governments in australia, on the, their role to play a supporting role to the us. it which the u. s. as in launched itself onto this

aggression against china because of extreme jealousy, it seemed so unfortunately, the pendant politics is really creating a huge dilemma. meanwhile, in a separate military development, japan things its considering increasing the range of its new high speed missile to beyond the 1000 kilometers would put coastal areas of china and north korea within range. however, sources within the country claim the improvements to the projectile, which is still under development, would facilitate better defenses of japan's remote islands where politics and china for a specialist. joseph gregory mahoney, safety u. s. has long been brandishing its weapons in the asia pacific region. this has been something that we've seen sequenced again and again, starting really with the, with the obama administration, with the, with the so called at it. i think there's already an arms race. there's an arm, there's a race to rearm japan to upgrade weapons in south korea. to sell advanced weapons

to taiwan again to sell nuclear submarines to australia and station the bombers there. we know the u. s. the new bomber class entering service. we know the major powers are working on hyper solving missiles. i. japan has made the decision to take more responsibility for the national fence on the one hand, many of the region will find this provocative. on the other hand, it's a historic opening for japan to start to make itself less reliant on the u. s. was the security and this is a necessary did on a given the lack of trust that many have in their alliances with us. you know, if you depend too much on the us than you risk abandonment or simply declines leaving you vulnerable another story to bring you today. so for his president, has slum the american embassy in the country for causing panic with a warning about a potential terrorist attack that never happened. the u. s. did not consult the south african government or disclose any details. it has been alleged r t corresponding corolla tuttle. i can fill in the blanks,

is in all hands on deck for the south african law enforcement and intelligence services. they were sent scouring for any information and the evidence of a potential tara tag announced by the u. s embassy in pretoria. the u. s. government says that it had intel that terrorists were planning on taking large groups of people in the greater sent an area of johannesburg. this did not please officials in pretoria at all. presidents, aurora, pasa said that it was unfortunate that the u. s. government issued such an alert and so to panic among the people. but is this diplomatic route caused by the failure of intelligence to inform the precedent and used proper channels? the relations between the 2 countries will be likely negatively affected by blood for long, the ease long established trade relationship that goes way beyond issues of

security. yes, indeed to people anger to buy the behavior of the u. s. in this instance. but it's something that the 2 countries are most likely gonna be at work in $1000.00 city. if africa's richest square mile. and as a prominent list of tenants in both retail end of the space, it regularly attracts business travelers and holiday makers. true and this weekend, the city hosted various events which attracted thousands and a comedy show if thought to have been a possible target of the attacks. the eminent warnings were echoed by the french and german embassies, as well as the high commissions of britain, canada, in australia. but for the south african authorities, they say that by not sharing any of the information or evidence the united states is showing just how much they do not trust the south african law enforcement authorities. to investigate countries in the developing world would always be sensitive to the attitude of the super

a counter puts. so this doesn't bode well for that and especially implemented which south africans are doubting the capabilities of the south african state to, to protect them. but it was good that the government responded to say they were following up on the matter the you have empathy, seth. it issued the alert that are wanting to its citizens and that it has done so before in 2016, a similar situation happened. the u. s. embassy issued a terror alert saying that islamic terrorist groups were planning on taking malls in johannesburg and kicked out places, americans frequent. but the south african authorities, i choose the united states of causing a panic. there is a sense of responsibility about issuing such an a lead, but also a sense of impunity in the way washington goes about in a sovereign state. they know that even if their information is wrong or lacking in

the weight of evidence, there will be no consequences. indeed, there is a sense in which the developed world how it relates we've come to as of the global . so it has got a, an underlying tone off continued domination men power. however, attempts made more towards softer and deploy a diplomatic ways of approaching south africa rather than the forceful approach that we've seen historically. following the terror alert in 2016, there was only a dispute between us ambassador and the spokesperson for south africa, international relations department. and very little has changed since day. and as much as the south african intelligence community may be this made in the manner that the terror load was issued,

the united states is only expecting noise. and no consequence. got a letter for r t driver. germany's top diplomat says the e u is preparing to ramp up at sanctions against iran and is considering labeling the middle eastern countries as la mac revolutionary guard corps as a terrific grip. i made it clear last week that we will launch another package of sanctions that we will examine how we can also list the revolutionary guards as a terrorist organization. the economic revolution regard core is an integral parts over runs armed forces charged with defending the country against foreign interference. the u. s. s. sam native, the key member of the guard general, sullen money 2 years ago, sparking demonstrations throughout the country at the time runs regional rivals, saudi arabia and bahrain. already from the, the guard corps, a terrorist organization, the german foreign ministers,

words the do run country somewhat to the current state of the use relations with tyrann as the blocks by law for trade with iran reached almost 3000000000 euro in august. germany dominates as well in trade with iran among the you countries, 1200000000 euro and exports and a 192000000 and imports so far this year. political analysts christopher halle, however, believe that western governments are primarily seeking regime change in terror. the i or just the court has done nothing to europe, but the i r g c is the military force, the legitimate armed forces of iran. it has done nothing to europe, it has attacked europe. it hasn't done anything that would bring about any need to classify it today as a terrorist organization. this is simply a political move and move in line with the us. you need to listen, which is ultimately the goal is for regime change in iran. they don't want the

atomic republic anymore, and i believe strongly that they are looking to bulk and nice iran and to destroy this very proud nation. germany is be asserting itself as a major power military power in central europe. and will now use the power to do the bidding of the united states in europe, which is to slowly taking the noose and tear run. so pulling it away from having a, a policy done aligned with the u. s. on this issue. but bringing a closer in line with the us and israel in saudi arabia, in tightening distinction. and, you know, really cutting off iran from the diplomacy. and by labeling the i r g c as a terror organization, they try to accomplish that. i believe bill fail, but this is what their goal in the u. s. saves russia is responsible for,

must protest the hover opted in moldova, thousands of demonstrators. the mom, the pro western president resigned over failed economic policies of the same time. of course, washington has staunchly supported protests and other countries, challenging governments. it doesn't like ortiz dollar quarter. no, it takes up a story. dozens of protesters detained a mile, dove over the weekend, turns out they have some pro russian views, and washington's ringing the alarm bells. but it's all a kremlin ploy. russian influence operations attempt to exploit weaknesses and target countries in order to stabilize them from within. the united states continues to support mold of on efforts to combat corruption and counter russian influence. us didn't give us any proof that the protesters were somehow agents of moscow. here's what we do have proof of though washington and supports agitators challenging governments. it doesn't like all over the world. take the protests and ran. the state department openly says it's working in support of their goals. we're

working together to hold the iranian regime accountable for its vicious crackdown on brave young women who continue to come into the streets to demand their rights. back in 1979 though the us didn't think iran's absolute monarchy was all that vicious political prisoners were tortured in mass under the pro western shaw. but apparently that was no big deal. even now in haiti, the tone of u. s. officials is a lot different than dealing with protesters when the state there are opposing represents the interests of the red, white, and blue. the united states strongly condemned the acts of violence, bleeding, and destruction that have recently occurred in haiti. and those who instigated these events for their own ends. haitians throughout the country and across the social spectrum need to create the conditions that will allow a democratically elected government to take office as soon as possible. a full 180 degree turn from 2004. when the u. s. was widely believed to have been on the other side of the barricade supporting the violent regime change in that very same

country. by the way, if we go back to mall, dover, we see the same jekyll and hyde style foreign policy. the us says, these current protests are controlled by moscow, but when they were in pro russia, it was a different story. we encourage government authorities to continue to show restraint . citizens of democracy have the right to assemble and express their views in a peaceful manner. we encourage all mold of all citizens to work together and resolve their differences amicably. even joe biden came out in support of those protests back then. america will walk with you on this journey you've undertaken for a simple reason successful. moldova will benefit this region. it will benefit europe, and it will benefit the united states of america. america is definitely proven. it's ready to walk the journey of resistance with foreign agitators right up until the goals of the revolution start to diverge with u. s. foreign policy objectives.

a familiar scene once more in israel for the 5th time and just for years, dozens of parties are competing in elections for the national parliament. recent polls suggest the right wing party of former prime minister benjamin netanyahu is a head, possibly restoring him to the premier ship. while the liberal party of the current prime minister, your love, it is expected to come in 2nd, no background to that. a local human rights watch dog has raised concerns that palestinians in contest territories, can become candidates in the elections or even cast votes. whereas is really living in those areas of such rights. the organization saves israel has reduced palestinians also to the state of apartheid on the human invoice for the palestinian territories has also slammed israel for quote, settler colonialism. the palestinian authority prime minister has criticize the really election restrictions to claiming that even campaigning has

led to more bloodshed, committed against his people doesn't have a slightly lantus habit. i am the campaigning for israel's elections has led to more killing, more israeli settlements and blockades against our people. we know these elections will not bring about a partnership for peace. the world must force israel to allow our palestinian people to exercise their right to vote during these elections, including in the city of jerusalem, bazaar in the state in if you like in the 1st place, it's an apartheid ecolog nearest estate. so the violence is part of this colonial project anyway, all the time since the establishment was that was right. it was based on violence. and today the violence is even more with the atrocities by the israel army on the one hand. and the settlers, who are protected by this army, who are also violating the international law and violating the human rights for the

palestinians by all these attacks and atrocities against the palestinians in all of their life aspects. these are aly, thanks to them. they provide us every day with the new evidence of these violations . but if the international community are going to stop that, i think today it's, it's really very hard to say so or to even expect that because they are not going to take any action against it. unless they take action and nothing will happen on the one hand, most of the european who do know that there's a lot of a rating of international law and viability, even the european those, and the human rights close. but at the same time, they say, or they think that their relationship of their interest with america is more important than the, the rights of the best unions, which are quite clear. like what is a kind of, you know, hypocrisy and doubly strengthen. kellett said, returned to african,

now nigerian trips have reportedly neutralized a group of islamic state militants who are trying to break into a prison camp to free senior members of the terrace group. the west african country has been combating extreme this without much foreign assistance, despite the u. s. describing nigeria as a quote close partner on regional security matters. we do cooperate closely with countries around the world. certainly close partners like south africa like nigeria, unshared security concerns. we deeply appreciate efforts that they make to protect their interests and in turn, our interest in the country as well. i mean, escalating concerns about terrorism in nigeria. the u. s. state department has ordered it's non emergency personnel to leave the country. africa focused news outlet. so hard and you said on monday, the scores of islamic state fighters were killed by an interior military forces of they tried to free their imprison leaders. the government troops had reportedly

been waiting to ambush the militants on one of the tara groups come under. it was captured during the local terrorist group know enough as low make state west africa province as reportedly been growing in power of wages, devastating and guerilla war in north eastern nigeria. we heard from barrister and commentator zelma stuff who stays only peace, thoughts can finally in the us diligence. you know, if you thought about these, well, the apple groups no need for groups are different. they don't see eye to eye. they are fighting within them. so if you've got about only 12 is what i've been down. but that is the tendency that they are divided into 4. now that anybody seen a lie, i get the i thank you. but you cannot, for how long that one cannot hear it taking about breakdown or do you think they

only get? and that is why we need to see to and then why an amicable meant to this company is through never mentioned that everything got well be asleep, even come go to the terrible things when they little okay. moving to the us now as some prominent democrats of expressed outrage over the world's richest man, ellen musk, a self described free speech. absolutely. this purchasing twitter, a former senior official under the obama administration. julian castro said, must should be held responsible if he allows hate speech on the platform. this point, i think it's going to be the responsibility of each and every one of us to do what we can to whole de la musk accountable. he will back off when there is pressure. and so folks who care about the truth, who care about protecting vulnerable communities,

who ultimately are the ones who are going to be most hurt by his irresponsible behavior in allowing these voices that have to be elevated on this huge platform. we have to keep pushing back, and my hope is that that is going to make a difference in the long run. well, it comes out must cause a nice the creation of a content, moderation council to revise twitter policies and bonds for expressing certain opinions while simultaneously disbanding the board of directors and cutting stuff. among those fired by the new ceo was the executive who bond former us president donald trump, twitter, and i fact checks president biden statements exposing his gaps and the number of miss fruits. we heard from the host of the conservative daily podcast, jo othman, this is ellen musk taking over twitter is good, not only for the u. s, but also around the world. i think what the democrats are starting to realize is

that by must taking over twitter even if they were to have a mass exodus. it still is a powerful platform where people are too curious to be dragged back to the platform to figure out what is or is not true. and by him doing the things that he did, you know, he, he fact checked hillary clinton, he fact checked. joe biden, he fact checked the new york times, all in one day and which made the talking heads on the radical left. that makes it, he makes their heads explode. because what he's, what he's really saying is, if you're going to say something, make sure it's true. otherwise we're not going to make sure that people actually can hear it. if they do here, we're going to make sure that they know because we do believe in free speech, that what you're saying is a lie. you know, ellen talks about how he wants to restore humanity and the 1st place restoration to get to a place of restoration inside of society is to make sure you can have honest dialogue in by him doing this. the one thing that i see coming out of this is that we're going to get back to honest dialogue and we're going to have conversations rather

feeling like we're oppressed. so i think it's going to be good for the us. it'll be good for people around the world. the origins, the current states and i look into the future of fascism next. will it di, i'd like other extreme ideologies or continue causing division deep into this century. they close for a short documentary with ah ah.