well hey i, we have pledged to guarantee security. if you create attacks, these vessels, we will be to blame. vladimir putin accuses kiev of posing a threat to that black sea wheat corridor as moscow against loans ukraine for using the un brokerage a passageway to launch military attacks. also had on the program, south africa's president lashes only to the u. s embassy for golding panic about a potential terrorist attack, but never occur. ma'am john, a warns of a potential arms raised pushed forward by washington. that's as the u. s. reportedly plans to deploy 6 nuclear capable. b, 52 bombers,

terrestrial. yeah. with from moscow to the world, this is r t. my name is gina neil on 30 minutes of news and views start. no russian president vladimir putin has clarified that the country is not quitting the black sea grain daily, but only suspending its participation in it. the move came about because of security concerns following a ukrainian drone attack on the russian navy blue rule. they pose a threat both to our ships, which must ensure the safety of the great exports and to civilian vessels that are engaged in this. we have pledged to guarantee security if you create attacks, these vessels, we will be to blame. every one is now talking about what russia is doing without thinking about what has led to this, the creation of a threat to this humanitarian corridor. russia also focused on the issue during

a un security council meeting, accusing ukraine of triggering the halt with a recent grown attack on russian naval assets in crimea. moscow further noted that the safety of shipping along the corridor cannot be guaranteed until he had commits not, not to use it for military purposes. ortiz kill up. it takes us through the main points of the heated discussion. the. you have a lot tickets on the meeting, took place and we heard from you an official describing the grain deal, the fact that it now suspended the impact that'll have on the global economy on the price of grain globally cetera. then from there we did hear from the russian representative ambassador and then the took to the floor in the security council chamber, and just laid out the facts about why reactions of ukraine using the corridor for military purposes. the recent attack have forced russia hands, and the deal is now suspended. this was not russia using this is

a response to action from ukraine that were carried out with the support of the when this is what he said. kim's attack on the black sea fleet puts an end to the humanitarian dimension of the stumble agreements. the black sea grain initiative should not be carried out without russia's presence. we are surprised that the un did not condemn, gives attack on the ships of the black sea fleet. now, there were some voices at the security council chamber who did speak in support of what russia said, referring to this attack as essentially an active terrorism. preventing moved from being distributed, violating agreement now we heard from the state and their usual ally to ignored what russia backs russia presented and simply proceeded to demonize russia as they usually do in meetings of this type, claiming that everything russia does is somehow a conspiracy theory every shred of evidence that russia has presented is somehow all fabrication not going into any d. simply not acknowledging the fact that russia brings before the council,

the typical actions and words of the usa and their allies before the council. however, there was a moment of optimism that we did see which was we heard un officials announcing they will be conducting an investigation of the attack on the blacks. the fleet. mister president, it would indeed be a grave abuse of the black sea grain initiative. if it were used in any way for military operational advantage, united nations has the sullen privilege of assisting the parties to implement this unique arrangement. and acting as a secretary it. the u. n. is ready to investigate along with member states, party to the initiative. any and all evidence, if requested quite a day at the un headquarters in manhattan. let's remember this very building that house the, the un security council also hosts the world food program and all kinds of

n g o. the hands of use that are responsible for dealing with the situation regarding world hunger. so today in that very building, we had the un security council of 15 member body that leads the united nation convened to discuss the aftermath of an attack on a humanitarian corridor. and candidate for enabling food to be ex bored in graham. when returning to his speech on monday, the russian president also call the sabotage, have been nord stream pipeline system, quote. terrorist attack that's after russia was finally allowed to examine the site of the explosions, a full month after the damage was done. the question is sitting the skunk of ceiling. miss gas problem has been allowed to examine the explosion site on the north stream pipeline system. there were 2 craters, 3 and 5 meter steep. a pipe 40 meters long was ripped out of place, bent at a 90 degree angle, and hurled 40 meters to the side in the direction of the north train to pipeline,

which was also damaged by the explosion. and fragments of that pipe, but this was clearly a terrorist attack. it is difficult for us to maintain control over this part of the system. because it's within the territory of the special economic zone of denmark, sweden and germany, extra to achieve v. a reminder, the explosions on the north stream pipelines occurred on september 26th and were quickly declared as sabotaged by both the western russia. an international investigation was launched, of moscow was denied participation. russia claims that the u. k. was involved in the attack than accusation london has dismissed. former pentagon security analysts, michael maloof, offered his thoughts to r t on why sweden and denmark did not initially allow russia to inspect this site of the north stream pipeline explosions. the 1st impression that comes to mind is that they may have been involved or some special forces may have been involved. you

cannot rule that out and it just doesn't make any logical sense for russia to, to damage or, or destroy its own pipeline. so, and there may be other entities involved and those, those countries may be trying to hide the food. the real culprit is from the west. i mean, you cannot buy deduction. it had to come from the west, and i suspect it was either great britain or the united states to they're never going to admit it. and we probably will never know for sure. i think it's reason why we, it would be good for russia to go down and, and check it, check and investigate its own on its own. and to, to see if they can find any evidence as to who might have been involved. china is warning of a potential arms race pushed forward by washington. after them merged up the u. s. s. plumbing to deploy up to 6 nuclear capable. b,

52 bombers in northern australia. the relevant us behaviors have increased regional tensions seriously undermined regional peace instability. and may trigger and arms race in the region. the investigation bias really as a b. c television that we're a claim, washington is seeking to how's the bombers of the $10.00 base of darwin, the regional capital of the northern territory. it said the project will cost upwards of $100000000.00. all the work is due to be completed within 4 years. well, we got comment on the deployment of the b, 52 bombers from the pentagon. it sees the rotational presence of us or craft industry as a part of the 2 nations cooperation. the statement also highlighted the pentagon, quotes investments and commitment to australia. while the director of the center for country hedge a monic studies the think tank, tim anderson sees people in australia are concerned about a military conflict cut breakout between the u. s. and china. it's really

a terrible development, which is scaring a lot of people who strike no matter what they political persuasion because they know that china, which is non threatening to australia and which is the straightest largest trading partner, has been for some time. it's an impossible task to step into a conflict with a how that's big and for no real reason. and unfortunately it's being done simply because of the dependence of successive governments in australia, on the, their role to player, supporting role to the us in which the u. s, as in launched itself onto this aggression against china because of extreme jealousy. it seems so. unfortunately, the pendant politics is really creating a huge dilemma. meanwhile, in a separate military development japan phase, it's considering increasing the range of its new high speed missile to beyond a 1000 kilometers. that would put co still areas of china and north korea within

range. however, military sources within the country claim the improvements to the project, which is still under development would facilitate better defenses of japan's remote islands or politics and china, for especially as joseph gregory mahoney says the u. s. has long been brandishing its weapons in the asia pacific region. this has been something that we've seen sequence again and again, starting out really with the, with the obama administration, with the so called pitted. i think there's already an arms race. there's an arm there, there's a race to rearm japan, to upgrade weapons in south korea, to sell advanced weapons to taiwan again to sell nuclear submarines to australia and stationed the bombers. there. we know the us as a new bomber class in service. we know the major powers are working on hypersonic missiles i, japan has made the decision to take more responsibility for its national fence. on the one hand, many of the region will find this provocative. on the other hand, it's a historic opening for japan to start to make itself less reliant on the u. s. was

the for security, and this is a necessary development given the lack of trust that many have in their alliances with us. you know, if you depend too much on the u. s, than you risk abandonment or simply declines leaving you vulnerable care. let's move to another story. nice. south africa's president has slum the american embassy in the country for causing panic. with a warning about a potential terrorist attack, but never happened, the u. s. reportedly did not consult the south african government or disclose any details or t correspondent carumba letter plan can fill in the blanks. it was in all hands on deck for the south african law enforcement and intelligence services. they were st . scouring for any information and the evidence of a potential tara tag announced by the u. s. embassy in pretoria. the u. s. government says that it had intel that terrorists were planning on taking large

groups of people in the greater sent an area of johannesburg. this did not please officials in pretoria at all. president obama pasa said that it was unfortunate that the u. s. government issued such an alert and sold panic among the people. but is this diplomatic route caused by the failure of intelligence to inform the president and use proper channels. the relations between the 2 countries will be likely negatively affected by blood for long. the ease, long established trade relationship that goes way beyond issues of security. yes, indeed, people be angered by the behavior of the u. s. in this instance. but it's something that the 2 countries are most likely gonna be at work tomorrow. center city, if africa's richest square mile and as a prominent list of tenants involved retail end of the space,

it regularly attracts business travelers and holiday makers to this weekend. the city hosted various events which attracted 1000 and a comedy show is thought to have been a possible target of the attacks. the eminent warnings were echoed by the french and german embassies, as well as the high commissions of britain, canada, in australia. but for the south african authorities, they think that by not sharing any of the information or evidence, the united states is showing just how much they do not trust the south african law enforcement authorities. to investigate countries in the developing world would always be sensitive to the attitude of the super our counterparts. so this doesn't bode well for that. thank. especially in m, environmental. we'd sub africans a doubting the capabilities of the south african state to to protect them. but it was good that the government responded to say they were calling regarding

the matter. do you have empathy, seth? it issued the alert that are wanting to its citizens and that it has done so before in 2016, a similar situation happened. the u. s. embassy issued a terror alert saying that islamic terrorist groups were planning on taking malls in johannesburg and kicked out places, americans frequent. but the south african authorities, i choose the united states of causing a panic. there is a sense of responsibility about issuing such an a lead, but also a sense of impunity in the way washington goes about in a sovereign state. they know that even if their information is wrong or lacking in the weight of evidence, there will be no consequences. indeed, there is a sense in which the developed world how it relates with countries of the global south. it has got a, an underlying toll of continued domination and power.

however, attempts made more towards softer and deploy a diplomatic ways of approaching south africa rather than the forceful approach that you're seeing. historically. following the corral it in 2016, there was only a dispute between us and both of them and the spokesperson for south africa. international relations department and very little has changed that. and as much as the south african intelligence community may be this made in the manner that the terror alert was issued, the united think its only expecting noise and no consequence got well, it had enjoyed an overly familiar scene once more. and israel for the 5th time and just for years, dozens of parties are competing in elections for the national parliament. recent pool suggests the right wing party,

a former prime minister benjamin netanyahu is ahead. at possibly restoring the bus to the premier ship, the liberal party of the current prime minister, your lot is expected to come in 2nd, in the background to all of that though, a local human rights watch dog has raised concerns over palestinians in contested territories. not being allowed to stand as candidates in the elections or even cast votes, whereas is really living in those areas. can. the organization also alleges that israel has reduce palestinians to the state of apartheid while the un and boy, for the palestinian territories, recently slammed israel for, quote, settler colonialism. these really government has previously said such remarks, the goal of defaming and isolating israel by betraying it as a racist entity. while the palestinian authority prime minister also criticize the really election restrictions teaming up, even campaigning has led to more bloodshed committed against his people. doesn't have, it's like really learned to say about the armor. the campaigning for israel's elections

has led to more killing, more israeli settlements and blockades against our people. we know these elections will not bring about a partnership for peace. the world must force israel to allow our palestinian people to exercise their right to vote during these elections, including in the city of jerusalem. is there any state in that? if you like in the 1st place, it's an apartheid, a call on nearest estate. so the violence is part of this colonial project anyway, all the time since the establishment was that it was right. it was based on violence. and today, the violence is even more with the atrocities by these right army on the one hand, and the settlers who are protected by this army who are also very rating the international law. and by letting the human rights for the parisians, by all these attacks and atrocities against the better seamans, in all of their life aspects. these are in the,

thanks to them. they provide us every day with the new evidence of these violations . but if the international community are going to stop that, i think today it's, it's really very hard to say so or to even expect that because they are not going to take any action against israel unless they take action. and i think will happen on the one hand, most of the european who do know that there are violating the international law and validity, even the european laws and the human rights close. but at the same time, they say, or they think that their relationship as their interest with america is more important than the, the rights of the unions which quite clear that which is a kind of but you know, hypocrisy. i'm doubly strengthened the u. s. sage, russia is responsible for mass protests that recently erupted in moldova, with thousands of demonstrators demanding the pro western president, resign over failed economic policies. of the same time. of course,

washington has staunchly supported protests in other countries, challenging governments. it doesn't like our teeth normal quarter takes up the story. dozens of protesters detained in moldova over the weekend, turns out they have some pro russian views, and washington's ringing. the alarm bells that it's all a kremlin ploy. russian influence operations attempt to exploit weaknesses in target countries in order to destabilize them from within. the united states continues to support mold of on efforts to combat corruption and counter russian influence. us didn't give us any proof that the protesters were somehow agents of moscow. here's what we do have proof of though washington supports agitators challenging governments. it doesn't like all over the world. take the protests and a ran. the state department openly says it's working in support of their goals. we're working together to hold the iranian regime accountable for its vicious crackdown on brave young women who continued to come into the streets to demand

their rights. back in 1979 though the us didn't think iran's absolute monarchy was all that vicious political prisoners were tortured and mass under the pro western shaw. but apparently that was no big deal. even now in haiti, the tone of u. s. officials is a lot different than dealing with protesters when the state there are opposing represents the interests of the red, white, and blue. the united states strongly condemned the acts of violence, looting, and destruction that have recently occurred in haiti. and those who instigated these events for their own ends. haitians throughout the country and across the social spectrum need to create the conditions that will allow a democratically elected government to take office as soon as possible. a full 180 degree turn from 2004. when the u. s. was widely believed to have been on the other side of the barricade, supporting violent regime change in that very same country. by the way, if we go back to mall, dover, we see the same jekyll and hyde style foreign policy. the us says,

these current protests are controlled by moscow, but when they were in pro russia, it was a different story. we encourage government authorities to continue to show restraint . citizens of democracy have the right to assemble and express their views in a peaceful manner. the encourage all mould of on citizens to work together and resolve their differences amicably. even joe biden came out in support of those protests back then. america will walk with you on this journey you've undertaken for a simple reason, a successful. moldova will benefit this region. it will benefit europe and it will benefit the united states of america. america is definitely proven. it's ready to walk the journey of resistance with foreign agitators right up until the goals of the revolution start to diverge with u. s. foreign policy objectives. i guess i'm, we're sorry to bring you to be including this. germany's top diplomat saves that you is preparing to rump off its sanctions against around. now this considering

labeling the middle eastern countries as lumnick revolution regard core a to risk with. i made it clear last week that we will launch another package of sanctions that we will examine how we can also list the revolutionary guards as a terrorist organization. well, the islamic revolution regard core is an integral part of a rounds armed forces charged with defending the country against foreign interference. the u. s. a suff and needed a key member of the guard general custom cilla money 2 years ago, sparking demonstration throughout the country at the time a runs regional rival of saudi arabia and bahrain have already rounded the guard corps, a terrorist organization. the german foreign minister words run contrary somewhat to the current states of the use relations with terror as the blocks by law rule. trade with iran reached almost 3000000000 euro in august. germany dominates in

trade with iran among the countries as well. notching up 1200000000 euro and exports, and 192000000 in import. so far this year the political unless christopher halle believes western governments are primarily seeking regime change in terror. the iron duty court has done nothing to europe, but the iron, you see is the military force, the legitimate armed forces of iran. it has done nothing to europe, it has attacked europe. it hasn't done anything that would bring about any need to classify it today as a terrorist organization. this is simply a political move and move in line with the us. you need realism, which is ultimately the goal is for regime change in iran. they don't want to make their public anymore, and i believe strongly that they are looking to balkanized iran and to destroy this

very proud nation. germany is resorting itself as a major power military power in central europe and will now use the power to do the bidding of the united states in europe, which is to slowly taken the noose on tier run. so pulling it away from having a, a policy done aligned with the u. s. on this issue. but bringing a closer in line with the us and israel and saudi arabia in tightening the sanctions. and, you know, really cutting off iran from the diplomacy and by labeling the i r g b as a terror organization, they try to accomplish this. i, i believe bill failed, but this is what their goal nigerian troops have reportedly neutralize a group of islamic state terrorists who tried to break into a prison camp to free senior members of the military group. the west african country has been combating extremis without much foreign assistance i should on,

despite the us describing nigeria as a quote close partner or regional security matters. we do cooperate closely with countries around the world. certainly close partners like south africa, like nigeria, unshared security concerns. we deeply appreciate efforts that they make to protect their interests and in turn, our interests in the country as well. amid the ask living concerns about terrorism in nigeria, the u. s. state department has ordered it's non emergency personnel to leave the country africa focus current 1st. let's harden you said on monday that scores of islamic state fighters were killed by the jury and military forces. they tried to extricate their imprisoned leaders. the government troops reportedly been preparing for the militants and bush, and long term groups. commanders was captured during the lead. while the local terrorist group, known as this law make state west africa province,

has reportedly been growing in power of wages. a devastating guerrilla war in northeastern nigeria. we heard from forester and commentators zillow ma, stuff who stays only peace talks can finally and the hostilities. you know, if you thought about these, well, the apple groups, now, these 4 groups are different. they don't see eye to eye, they are fighting within them. so if you've heard about only these, well, is what i've been down. but that is the tendency that they are due by the you know, that anybody being alive. but you cannot help for how long that one cannot take in about a breakdown or do you think they only like i get? and that is why we need to feed on cable and then buying an amicable that meant to this company is through never mentioned that everything got well. bursley even can

go to the table, things when they put up some prominent us democrats of express our rage over the world, riches man alone, muskets self described, free speech, absolutist purchasing twitter. a former senior official under the obama administration said musk should be held responsible if he allows hate speech on the platform. this point i think it's going to be the responsibility of each and every one of us to do what we can to hold the law mask accountable. he will back off when there is pressure. and so folks who care about the truth, who care about protecting vulnerable communities, who ultimately are the ones who are going to be most hurt by his irresponsible behavior and allowing these voices that have to be elevated on this huge platform. we have to keep pushing back and in my hope is that that is going to make a difference in the long run will not may have been in response to musk announcing

the creation of a content moderation console to revise twitter policies on bonds for expressing certain opinions while simultaneously disbanding the board of directors and cutting stuff among those fired by the new ceo was the executive who bond former us president donald trump, twitter, and i fact checks president biden statements exposing his gaps in the number of mr routes. but we heard from the host of the conservative dealing podcast, your ultimate, who sees love taking over twitter is good, not only for the u. s, but also the world. i think what the democrats are starting to realize is that by must taking over twitter even if they were to have a mass exodus. it still is a powerful platform where people are too curious to be dragged back to the platform to figure out what is or is not true. and by him doing the things that he did, you know, he, he fact check hillary clinton, the fact checked. joe biden, he fact checked the new york times all in one day and which made the

talking heads on the radical left. maybe he meant he makes their heads explode because what he's, what he's really saying is if you're going to say something, make sure it's true. otherwise we're not going to make sure that people actually can hear it. if they do hear, we're going to make sure that they know because we do believe in free speech, that what you're saying is a lie, you know, even talks about how he wants to restore humanity and the 1st place of restoration to get to a place of restoration inside of society is to make sure you can have honest dialogue and by him doing this, the one thing that i see coming out of this is that we're going to get back to honest dialogue. we're going to have conversations rather feeling like we're oppressed. so i think it's gonna be good for the us. that would be good for people around the world. love is where we'll even use roundup for now, but more programs get going in that moment. see what's showing wherever you are today, right ahead. i forgot. ah

. to what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy even foundation, let it be an arms race, his on offense bearing dramatic development only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very difficult time. time to sit down and talk with her. mm.