elsewhere in lodge obs companies would lose millions and millions, or is business businesses good? and that is the reality of what we're facing, which is fashion. with we have pledged to guarantee security. if you create attacks, these vessels, we will be to blame. vladimir putin accused his kiev, posing a threat to that black sea weak kara door, does multiple again, slums, ukraine, for using the un roper safe passage way to launch military attacks. also had on the program, south africa's president lashes knowledge up the u. s. embassy for causing panic about a potential terrorist attack that never occurred on china for a potential arms race pushed forward by washington. the u. s. reportedly plans to deploy 6 nucular capable b,

52 bombers to australia with heavier catching the program from today across the globe. welcome to moscow on the news roundup on our team. my name is unit oneal. russian president vladimir has clarified that the country is not quitting the black sea grain deal, but only suspending its participation. now the move came about because of security concerns following a ukrainian drone attack on the russian navy tools, the new rules they pose a threat both to our ships, which must ensure the safety of the grain exports and to civilian vessels that are engaged in this, we have pledged to guarantee security if you create attacks, these vessels, we will be to blame. every one is now talking about what russia is doing without thinking about what has led to this, the creation of

a threat to this humanitarian corridor. russia also focused on the issue during a un security council meeting, accusing ukraine of triggering the holes with a recent drone attack on russian naval assets in crimea. moscow further notice that the safety of shipping along the corridor cannot be guaranteed until commits not to use it for military purposes. are to kill us law and takes us through the main points of the heated discussion of the un tickets the meeting took place and we heard from un official describing the grain deal, the fact that it now suspended the impact that'll have on the global economy on the price of grand globally cetera. then from there we did hear from the russian representative ambassador and then the took to the floor in the security council chamber and just laid out the facts about why reactions of ukraine using the corridor for military purposes. the recent attack have forced russia hand,

and the deal is now suspended. this was not russia using. this is a response to action from ukraine that were carried out with the support of the west. this is what he said. kim's attack on the black sea fleet puts an end to the humanitarian dimension of the stumble agreements. the black sea grain initiative should not be carried out without russia's presence. we are surprised that the un did not condemn, gives attack on the ships of the black sea fleet. now, there were some voices at the security council chamber who did speak in support of what russia said, referring to this attack as essentially an active terrorism. preventing moved from being distributed, violating agreement now we heard from the state and their usual ally to ignored what russia backs russia presented and simply proceeded to demonize russia as they usually do in meetings of this type, claiming that everything russia does is somehow a conspiracy theory every threat of evidence that russia has presented is somehow

all fabrication not going into any. simply not acknowledging the fact that russia brings before the council, the typical actions and words of the usa and there allied before the council. however, there was a moment of optimism that we did see which was we heard un officials announcing they will be conducting an investigation of the attack on the blacks. the fleet. mister president, it would indeed be a grave abuse of the black sea grain initiative. if it were used in any way for military operational advantage, united nations has the sullen privilege of assisting the parties to implement this unique arrangement. and acting as a secretary it. the u. n. is ready to investigate along with member states, party to the initiative. any and all evidence, if requested quite a day at the un headquarters in manhattan, let's remember that very building that house the,

the un security council also posted the world food program and all kinds of n g o. the hands of use that are responsible for dealing with the situation regarding world hunger. so today in that very building, we had the un security council of 15 member body that leads the united nation. we convened to discuss the aftermath of an attack on a humanitarian corridor. and candidate for enabling food to be ex bored in graham. and just returning to president putin's speech on monday, he also said that around 5 percent of the export only from ukraine, have gone to the pseudonym poorest nations. earlier i discussed the issue and more with human rights labor rights. laura dunn complex here in the studio. well, obviously i am saddened by it. it's, you know, people are going to be hurt by that. a lot of the world, particularly the middle east in africa, depend on grain from this region for their survival at the same time. and it does

appear that they wore attacks against the russian fleet in the black sea by ukrainian forces. and apparently the u. k. was somehow involved as well, and obviously, you know, when that happens, it's no longer humanitarian court or right. it's now a military chord or so it's, it's very regrettable. but i would say that it's, that it is understandable. russia points, i fence for many months since the initial you and broker deal was done, a lot of the grain was going to europe are countries. in other words, that didn't necessarily really need it at the expense of african, in particular, in asian countries to russia, says that it will give grain to africa for free, and then at market prices afterwards. so they are saying we want to look after the people most the in need, but again, not message isn't getting through in the west. no, i mean look the disinformation,

the censorship around this conflict in ukraine and around russian general the dis, information and censorship in the west. and particularly in the u. s, which i can speak to because i am from the united states is unprecedented. i have never seen this level of disinformation ever regarding any conflict in that saying a lot because we've been lied to a lot about many things about weapons of mass destruction in iraq about the gulf. it's all again in vietnam, etc, etc. but this is the worst i've ever seen it. they do not want to humanize russia or even the russian people. they want the dehumanizing them to justify continuing to send billions and billions of dollars of armament to ukraine and returning again to the russian presence beach yesterday. he also called the sabotage of the north stream pipeline system, a quote, terrorist attack that's off to russia's top gas producer was finally allowed to investigate the site of the explosions

a full month after the damage was done. we still exist in the just problem has been allowed to examine the explosion site on the north stream pipeline system. there were 2 craters, 3 and 5 meters. deep pipe 40 meters long was ripped out of place, bent at a 90 degree angle, and hurled 40 meter to the side in the direction of the north train to pipeline, which was also damaged by the explosion and fragments of that pipe. this was clearly a terrorist attack. it is difficult for us to maintain control over this part of the system because it's within the territory of the special economic zone of denmark, sweden, in germany, a gee, the explosions on the north stream pipelines occurred on september 26 on were quickly declared as sabotaged by both the west and russia, an international probe was launched, but moscow was denied participation. russia claims that the u. k. was involved in the attack and accusation london was dismissed for a pentagon security analysts,

michael maloof, offered his thoughts to our t. y sweden and denmark did not initially allow russia to inspect the site of the nor stream pipeline exposure. and the 1st impression that comes to mind is that they may have been involved, or some special forces may have been involved. you cannot rule that out and it just doesn't make any logical sense for russia to, to damage or, or destroy its own pipeline. so, and there may be other entities involved. and those, those countries may be trying to hide through the real culprit is from the west. i mean, you cannot buy deduction. it had to come from the west. and i suspect it was either great britain or the united states. they're never going to admit it. and we probably will never know for sure. i think it's reason why we, it would be good for russia to go down and,

and check it. it's check or investigate its own on its own. and to see if they can find any evidence as to who might have been involved. in other headline story today, china is warning of a potential arms race pushed forward by washington. after it emerged up the u. s. as plumbing to deploy up to 6 nuclear capable, b 52 bombers in northern austria. the relevant u. s. behaviors have increased regional tensions seriously undermined regional peace and stability and may trigger and arms race in the region. the investigation bias really as a b. c, television network claims washington a seeking to how is the bombers of the tindle or a base south of darwin, the regional capital up in northern territory. it said the project will cost upwards of $100000000.00. all the work is due to be completed within 4 years. our team reached out to washington for comment on the plan deployments of the b

$52.00 bombers that responded and said the rotational presence of us are a craft industry as a part of the 2 nations cooperation. at the statement we received also highlighted the pentagon. quote, investment on commitment to australia will the director of the center for a country hedge a monic studies thing tank, tim anderson safe people in australia are concerned. now the military conflict could break up between the u. s. and china. it's really a terrible development, which is scaring a lot of people who strike no matter what they're political persuasion because they know that china, which is non threatening to australia and which is the straightest largest trading partner, has been for some time. it's an impossible task to step into a conflict with a power that big and for no real reason. and unfortunately, it's being done simply because of the dependence of successive governments in

australia, on the their role to play a supporting role to the us. it which the u. s. as in launched itself onto this aggression against china because of extreme jealousy. it seems so. unfortunately, the pendant politics is really creating a huge dilemma involved in a separate military development. japan say's its considering increasing the range of its new high speed miss file to beyond a 1000 kilometers. the significance of that is that would put coastal areas of china and north korea within range. wherever military sources within the country claim the improvements to the project, which is still under development, would facilitate better defences of japan's remote islands. of politics on china for a specialist, joseph gregory mahoney sees the us this long been brandishing its weapons in that asia pacific region. this has been something that we've seen sequence again and again, starting out really with the, with the obama administration,

with the so called pitted. i think there's already an arms race. there's an arm there, there's a race to rearm japan, to upgrade weapons in south korea, to sell advanced weapons to taiwan again to sell nuclear submarines to australia and stationed the bombers. there. we know the us as a new bomber class entering service. we know the major powers are working on hypersonic missiles i, japan has made the decision to take more responsibility for its national fence. on the one hand, many of the region will find this provocative. on the other hand, it's a historic opening for japan to start to make itself less reliant on the u. s. was for security, and this is a necessary development given the lack of trust that many have in their alliances with us. you know, if you depend too much on the u. s, than you risk abandonment or simply declines leaving you vulnerable. right. something else to tell you about it. a south african president has slum the american embassy in the country for causing panic. with a warning about a potential terrorist attack that never happened,

the u. s. reportedly did not consult the south african government or disclose any details at all or t corresponding problem. natalia can fill in the blanks is in all hands on deck for the south african law enforcement and intelligence services. they were sell, scouring for any information, and evidence of a potential tara tag announced by the u. s. embassy in pretoria. the u. s. government says that it had intel that terrorists were planning on taking large groups of people in the greater sent an area of johannesburg. this did not please officials in pretoria at all. presidential roman plaza said that it was unfortunate that the u. s. government issued such an alert and sold panic among the people. but is this diplomatic route caused by the failure of intelligence to inform the president and use proper channels. the relations between the 2 countries will

be likely negatively affected by blood for long. the ease, long established trade relationship that goes way beyond issues of security. yes, indeed to people and go to buy the behavior of the u. s. in this instance. but it's something that the 2 countries are most likely gonna be at work in law center . the city, if africa's richest square mile, and as a prominent list of tenants involved retail end of the space, it regularly attracts business travelers and holiday makers to this weekend. the city hosted various events which attracted 1000 and a comedy show is thought to have been a possible target of the attacks. the eminent warnings were echoed by the french and german empathy, as well as the high commissions of britain, canada, in australia. but for the south african authorities, they think that by not sharing any of the information or evidence, the united states is showing just how much they do not trust the south african law

enforcement authorities. to investigate countries in the developing world would always be sensitive to the attitude of the super our counterparts. so this doesn't bode well for that. thank especially him environment in which sub africans are doubting the capabilities of the south african state or to to protect them. but it was good, but the government responded to say they were following up on the matter the you have empathy, seth. it issued the alert that are wanting to its citizens and that it has done so before in 2016, a similar situation happened. the u. s. embassy issued a terror alert saying that is lambing terrorist groups were planning on taking malls in johannesburg and kicked out places americans frequent. but the south african authorities, i choose the united states of causing a panic. there is

a sense of responsibility about issuing such an a lead, but also a sense of impunity in the way washington goes about in a sovereign state. they know that even if they information is wrong or lacking in the weight of evidence, there will be no consequence. indeed, the ease a sense in which the developed world how it relates with countries off the global south. it has got a, an underlying told off continued domination men power. however, i thames made more to was soft. i deployed and diplomatic ways of approaching south africa rather than the forceful approach stuck receiving historically. following the corral it in 2016, there was only a dispute between us ambassador and the spokes person for south africa, international relations department. and very little has changed since day. and as

much as the south african intelligence community may be this made in the manner that the terror was issued, the united states is only expecting noise. and no consequence. got a letter for arthur enjoyed is that an overly familiar scene. once more in israel, for the 5th time in just 4 years, dozens of parties are competing in elections for the national parliament. recent poll suggests the right wing party of former prime minister benjamin netanyahu is a head, possibly restoring him to the premier ship, the liberal party of the current prime minister, your love, it is expected to come in 2nd. in the background to all that though a local, a human rights watch dog has raised concerns, are repulsed indians in contested territories, not being allowed to stand as candidates in the elections or even cast boats. whereas is really living in those areas come. the organization also alleges that

israel has reduced palestinians to a state of apartheid while the un envoy for the palestinian territories recently slammed israel for, quote, settler colonialism. the as really government has previously said, such remarks had the goal of defaming and isolating israel by betraying it as a racist entity. will a palestinian authority prime minister also criticize the is really election restrictions claiming that even campaigning has led to more bloodshed, committed against his people doesn't have his and i e learn to say, but i am the campaigning for israel's elections has led to more killing more israeli settlements and blockades against our people. we know these elections will not bring about a partnership for peace. the world must force israel to allow our palestinian people to exercise their right to vote during these elections, including in the city of jerusalem. is there any state in if you like in the 1st place,

it's an apartheid ecolog nearest estate. so the violence is part of this colonial project anyway, all the time since the establishment of it was, it was based on violence. and today, the violence is even more with the atrocities by these are army on the one hand and the settlers who are protected by this army who are also very reckoning international law. and by letting the human rights for the parisians, by all these attacks and atrocities against the better seniors, in all of their life aspects. these are really, thanks to them. they provide us every day with the new evidence of these violations . but if the international community are going to stop that, i think today it's, it's really very hard to say so or to even expect that because they are not going to take any action against it unless they take action. and i think will happen on the one hand, most of the european who do know that there's a lot of a ratings,

international law and validity, even the european, those and the human rights close. but at the same time they is saying, or they think that their relationship as their interest with america is more important than the, the rights of the. but as soon as which quite clear that which is a kind of what you know, hypocrisy, i'm doubly stone. but the u. s. c's, russia is responsible for math protests that recently erupted in moldova, with thousands of demonstrators demanding the pro western president resign over failed economic policies. the same time, of course, washington has staunchly supported protests in other countries, challenging governments. it doesn't like ortiz, donal quarter takes up the story. dozens of protesters detained in moldova over the weekend, turns out they have some pro russian views, and washington's ringing. the alarm bells that it's all a kremlin ploy. russian influence operations attempt to exploit weaknesses in

target countries in order to destabilize them from within. the united states continues to support mold of on efforts to combat corruption and counter russian influence. us didn't give us any proof that the protesters were somehow agents of moscow. here's what we do have proof of though washington supports agitators challenging governments. it doesn't like all over the world. take the protests and ran. the state department openly says it's working in support of their goals. we're working together to hold the iranian regime accountable for its vicious crackdown on brave young women who continue to come into the streets to demand their rights. back in 1979 though the us didn't think iran's absolute monarchy was all that vicious political prisoners were tortured in mass under the pro western shaw. but apparently that was no big deal. even now in haiti, the tone of u. s. officials is a lot different to dealing with protesters when the state there are opposing represents the interests of the red, white, and blue. the united states strongly condemned the acts of violence, looting,

and destruction that have recently occurred in haiti. and those who instigated these events for their own ends. patients throughout the country and across the social spectrum need to create the conditions that will allow a democratically elected government to take office as soon as possible. a full 180 degree turn from 2004. when the u. s. was widely believed to have been on the other side of the barricades supporting violent regime change in that very same country. by the way, if we go back to moldova, we see the same jekyll and hyde style foreign policy, u. s. as these current protests are controlled by moscow, but when they warrants pro russia, it was a different story. we encourage government authorities to continue to show restraint. citizens of a democracy have the right to assemble and express their views in a peaceful manner. be encourage all mould of on citizens to work together and resolve their differences amicably. even joe biden came out in support of those

protests back then. america will walk with you on this journey you've undertaken for a simple reason, a successful, moldova will benefit this region. it will benefit europe and it will benefit the united states of america. america's definitely proven it's ready to walk the journey of resistance with foreign agitators right up until the goals of the revolution start to diverge with u. s. foreign policy objectives. germany's top diplomat say's they e u is preparing to ramp up it's sanctions against around on this considering labeling the middle eastern countries islamic revolutionary guard corps terrorists . i made it clear last week that we will launch another package of sanctions that we will examine how we can also list the revolutionary gall. it's as a terrorist organization. the islamic revolutionary guard corps is integral part of runs armed forces, charged with defending the country against foreign interference. the u. s. s also

needed a key member of the guard general council sullen molly 2 years ago, sparking demonstrations throughout the country, runs regional rivals, saudi arabia, bahrain, already from the guard corps, a terrorist organization, la drummond, foreign ministers, words rung country somewhat to the current state of the use relations with to run the blocks bilateral trade with iran, reached almost 3000000000 euro in august. germany dominates the trade with a run among the countries as well. locking up 1200000000 euro exports and 192000000 and in port so far this year. the political analysts, chris, for a hell ali leaves, western governments are primarily seeking regime change in to run the iron duty court has done nothing to europe, but the iron, you see, is the military force, the legitimate armed forces of iran. it has done nothing to europe, it has attacked europe. it hasn't done anything that would bring about any need to

classify it today as a terrorist organization. this is simply a political move and move in line with the us. you need realism, which is ultimately the goal is for regime change in run, they don't want the islamic republic anymore. and i believe strongly that they are looking to balkanized iran and to destroy this very proud nation. germany is be asserting itself as a major power military power in central europe, and will now use its power to do the bidding of the united states in europe, which is to slowly taken the noose on tier run. so pulling it away from having a, a policy done aligned with the u. s. on this issue. but bringing a closer in line with the u. s. in israel and saudi arabia in tightening the sanction. and, you know, really cutting off iran from the diplomacy. and by labeling the i r b as

a terror organization, they try to accomplish this i, i believe they will fail. but this is what their goal in political attentions are rising in kenya, opposition leaders have denied recently elected president william router for his embrace of genetically modified crops amid fears of mouth, hunger, lifting the bomb on g. m. crops that has stood in place for 10 years was one of the 1st news by the new administration. it opens the door for the cultivation and imports of the scientifically engineered seeds, including the country, staple corn, according to information provided by the un. it is happening as kenya is experiencing the worst dry conditions in 40 years, putting millions at risk of famine, well, with food insecurity, seeming to be president reno's main concern, his opponents. will they think of

a larger schemes of play. they have accused the ruling government of profiting from the approval and becoming dependent on imports or of her back in 2011. the opposition has a very different opinion calling those opposed to g m. o foods to conservative. the americans cannot be so negligent as to allow the american people to consume gym of food if it is harmful. let us not be too conservative because science is moving on . conservatism is not going to help this country. alarming statements are calculated to instill fear. in this scheme, the worst, the pain, the bigger the gain for the shy locsin government manual, a tomba coordinator of the route to food initiative in kenya says that genetically modified crops while they're not the solution. because for one thing, they make the african country reliant on the west. i think that the fact that this has been done now, and that x is being given. that's fine. okay?

now, now testing solution is really unfortunate because, you know, they are all available options to you on that. you know, this can fishing division, you know, get that bait, inquire to get back on their feet on to be able to give them also to be able to be supporting, knowing that they can be able to engage the meaningful so that they can be able to see themselves, there is no one single who is interested in being fed by the government. i think that i asked before talks about being ever received yourself in dignity. i don't think that we have a student problem in this country that we need to use jim us. i think that's more of a hypes. what do you talk about of the benefits of gym loss? basically, we know that is really i didn't see introducing gym on

so many times in making sure that he likes to watch food. somebody in the sense that we can refund he was used to off. well, they're busy news day to remember to check in with r t dot com for all the latest developments and sending more besides, i'll be here again of the soft do hope you can show me that ah, ah me me.