Skip to main content

tv   News  RT  November 8, 2022 3:00am-4:01am EST

3:00 am
ah, sure, we could do that with americans gear up for key mid term elections with the countries economic crisis. the main concern for many me while for the ruling democrats manifest sports for ukraine, overshadowed domestic concerns. pakistan sees a 4th consecutive day of protest after an apparent assassination attempt on former pm run con. with demonstrators afloat. the streets have gone at capital demanding the president resign and an end to negotiations with inflation rises. and the currency weakens with
3:01 am
from moscow to the world. this is our international. my name is peter scott. here with the top stories at 11 am moscow times tuesday morning. welcome biden's. public approval rating has permitted to a near historic, lo, that's according to a poll conducted on monday, which is of course the eve of the u. s. midterms outings is concerned that democrats will lose the majority in congress when the elections are held on tuesday . the vote could see around one 3rd of us, congressional senators voted out well in the lower parliamentary chamber, the house of representatives, all 435 seats on the ballots. new governors for 36 states will also be chosen on tuesday, as well as new secretaries of states. you are responsible for further elections. major domestic issues such as abortion, access, gun, on both rights are very much in focus as well. now, many u. s. media outlets have been echoing biden's claims that us democracy is at risk
3:02 am
prompting phase. that republicans could take control of congress and drawing parallels with a possible red wave with us as us citizens seem not to share such concerns when asked what motivates their votes? as most americans say, the domestic problems are their top concern in the upcoming election battle always drives everything. i think that that is probably the factor that most directly influences people's day to day lives. so definitely a prominent decision in voting. i think the economy is an issue, but i think abortion is a here just you, especially in this city. i think the economy is definitely a big issue right now. i think a lot of people will be motivated, motivated by it, but i don't think the economy is like the biggest issue that happening in our society right now. well, one you could take a look at the condition of everything, the jobs, the unemployment, people are struggling. i can't even get so security in the benefits that they
3:03 am
offered me when i was paying taxes. i don't get. so there are hundreds of thousands of people that are really crushed under false economy. according to recent poll, a 79 percent of americans say their voting decision will be driven by economic issues, naming domestic problems as their biggest concern. now comes as washington recently approved a $400000000.00 aid package to ukraine, remaining firmly focused on events abroad. crane ukraine, ukraine, united states rule never, never, never recognized russia's claims on the ukraine. we demonstrated the united states commitment to the government and to the people of ukraine. pla, crana. i live in washington. it's all ukraine, ukraine, ukraine, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day. and it's not just costing time. it's also costing money over $18000000000.00 already spent. no surprise that with washington's big names all focused overseas,
3:04 am
many americans are feeling left behind. it seems that ukraine 1st america last, according to the latest polls, at least when it comes to the issues that americans are concerned about. ukraine is nowhere near the top of the list. america's working families are getting crushed by inflation. the high gas prices are squeezing them dry, the cost of living keeps going up and up. mortgages are also rising. but yet the government of the united states continues writing checks to kia with prices, surgeon and american. struggling to keep up. the federal reserve takes a bold step to chain what seems like relentless inflation and raises interest rates by 3 quarters of a percentage point. it's biggest hike in nearly 3 decades. food prices, up, 13 percent rent up more than 6 percent. if you're in the market for a car, new or used, you're paying more about 9 percent more than this time. last year. we've never seen drastic actions like this under janet yelling. we never saw this on november,
3:05 am
nancy, or even alan greens, when you actually to go back to the early 19 eighties under paul volcker. and i think this says a lot about not just how high inflation is, but how stubborn it raytheon and other military contractors are making a killing. but the american people are suffering. is anyone now shocked at the public is fuming? it's, i'm getting my money to ukraine. i have every way to disrespect you because you're the one pause inflation with 80000000 cray. again, i'm sorry, bill, in my mistake that you are a fraud. now some would say that heckling public officials is certainly not the way out. but what exactly does one do when the president himself seems to be somewhat out of touch with reality? not concerned about with i'm concerned about with when the people you, a lack did are focused on a country overseas, while things in your community just keep getting worse and worse. you might think
3:06 am
that it's time to be a little bit less polite. maybe it's time for some unconventional politics. the polls are now swinging to the right, regardless of any shouting at town halls. my republicans aren't exactly peace does either. and no one's expecting that if they come into office, they'll pull a complete 180 and reverse u. s. foreign policy in europe, ukraine in particular, but unlike their arrivals, they seem to have at least picked up on the widespread public opposition to prolonging a foreign war at the expense of the american people. nation building didn't work out too well in iraq, afghanistan, i don't think we should be doing it in ukraine. so targeted military assistance. one thing i favorite that, but yeah, this kind of nation building worse, less about our national security. it's more about nation building. i think it's a problem with ukraine everywhere, right. our country prices are borders. how to control human traffic. we've inflation, gas prices out of control. i mean, that's are covered with now such words from republicans have sent the dana crabs
3:07 am
into a tizzy. joe biden is now talking about nuclear armageddon and saying he's not interested in any talk of de escalation or negotiation. biden is declaring roughly half the electorate to be your redeemable right wing extremists, and he's also taken actions to cause an energy crisis that is certainly not unrelated to u. s. foreign policy. now it's little wonder that even for some long time democrats, this is all gotten to be a little bit much. now i believe in a government that's of the people by the people and for the people. unfortunately, today's democratic party does not. instead, it stands for a government that is of by and for the powerful elite. now in the mid term elections, americans don't vote for a president. they vote for representatives in the house and the senate. but these mid term elections are turning into a referendum on one man, a man who is not on the ballot,
3:08 am
but does live in the white house. and so while biting goes on with his democracy is at stake. montrose, it looks like a lot of americans are just not thrilled with his performance, and they may be recalling a few things that his predecessors sad about america 1st failed mop and r t. new york geopolitical strategies and us state departments, consultant johns at the ladies where he believes that despite concern for ukraine, the american public still puts in its own need. first, most americans are being pulled as being concerned, primarily about inflation, hudson gasoline prices, runaway crime, illegal aliens. and the rest of the ukraine war does not register very high for most americans because they're concerned about the wrong well being and economic hardship right now. i believe most americans are still very concerned about the well being of the ukrainian peoples, but ultimately every country and every citizen is going to be concerned with his own well being. first, the republican party is going to come in with
3:09 am
a very robust agenda that will be promoting economic growth. i think we'll see a number of issues that also help provide freakonomics relief for every day americans because they're entering a period of great anxiety. and i think the republican party will look to see how we best alleviate that anxiety by promoting job growth, economic growth, energy production, safety for our citizens and ceiling. the border and providing for control of our sovereign territory as the united states of america. and moving on now, protests have raised across pockets, done for 4 consecutive days, an apparent assassination attempts on former pm in wrong calling last week. and it comes as the country supreme court ordered police to investigate the shooting. a local journalists brings us the details. after 4 days when former prime minister, eminent composite acting vizier, but when he was leaning the lat long march towards capitelli slammer brought today,
3:10 am
the supreme court of pike, his band has ordered the police chief of the largest paris off one job to register the case against the attack as within 24 hours in the meanwhile into an 4 days are the protested and supporters of what i'm con. dad, they protested across the country in on major cities. he went to dave there at all straits. there was anger. there, there had a hat for it, i guess the government and the military or body in fiscal. you will take revenge for him on kong. it doesn't matter if the march continue, sir, and you firm on con this, he or not all children will answer their houses and apply them like they did tell many more will you kill, how many more will you burn alive? we are here, come and kill us. we will die for our country. we will step forward for him. ron con, we will march for him. ron con. audio man, i want to warn all federal institutions and the government stop this one day. you will have to answer for this. they will be running the rest of the for a plea. man,
3:11 am
suspects one is the primary. so one is the into there. melissa. not that is the heart. see that out of me off he said had implant cameras are raising cedar crest housing in his press conference yesterday when he was asking the judicial system. father justice saw that to today the supreme court has ordered the case must be registered within 24 hours. been long mass will again start from over 0, but i'm test it and it will go to the 1st level. and then it will come back to islamabad in 2 weeks out, 3 weeks. so inbound counties recovering. he has been shifter to his home, but the other leaders of the p t. there they will lead to protest, and later in montgomery joined them. i mean, the luck on our tv is slower, but pakistan. meanwhile, tensions are also on the rise in west africa as anti government protesters process, a ruptured in gonna as fuel and food prices hit record highs. is,
3:12 am
will some people in the streets had to say i this i too high. we are starving. we've lost copies out the book on by medicine and we have the most expensive in a new . we have to come out and put that gun in and have had enough. it has been a mess managing of a nation. we have been land our resources, everything that we have has been mis appropriate with appropriate bio politically. if you have seen that, what should belong to the people has been taken away from the people who are not happy. well, we don't see that bread i and people are talking, we're talking with crowds, so to the streets, to rally against the government's mismanagement. amid a worsening economic crisis,
3:13 am
calling for the president's resignation process is also demanded. and so ongoing faults for the i m f, which the president sees as an opportunity to overcome the downturn and cautious with his earlier pledge of a no 8 policy canadian list. winston, saki says the i mass flow will not save the country from a full blown recession. currently, the gun is economy. so phase significantly sees the early this year i was trained to, to, there's been a plunging plant in the country to a full blown economic recession. inflation rose from 10 to point 9 percent in january to 27.2 percent in september. and some of the analysts to believe the actual level is more than twice the official re possibly as high as 98 percent. our debt level has increased so astronomically compared to 2022 to $1.00. and for that reason, our inability to meet our debt repayment at lighthouse brought
3:14 am
a lot of pressure on the economy. the delicious possibly dam if will give us a boost, but it will not basically take our weight what we need to do in the country domestically by reviving our domestic industries and companies and also fortunate another quarter in of the news rushers become india's top oil supplier overtaking the likes of major exporters like saudi arabia and iraq, the new trade figures emerged prior to the indian foreign minister visit to moscow for talks with his russian counterparts. the 2 day trip which began on monday is aimed at expanding corporation during a period of key global challenges. and it is of course, a major topic on the agenda. and that's especially after the g 7 confirm plans to put a price cap on russian oil. when you deli on moscow show much more than just energy, both the members of bricks and beyond economic and cultural partnerships, they also cooperates heavily in the defense sector. we suppose also show
3:15 am
a majority of indian people consider russia the country's most reliable partner since new delhi came independence way back in 1947 with defense relations with moscow, also viewed as crucial by most well as cross live. now to ortiz, donal call to who's at the reception hall. i will just buy the venue of those folks . don, good morning, phil. can you tell us what we can expect from this meeting? good morning, peter. well, vh. these talks between rushes, foreign minister, circ, a laugh rav and his indian counterpart are just about to begin. specifically on the top of the agenda, is going to be trade specifically using national currencies in the trade agreements between these 2 countries to reduce dollar dependence. now, are also going to be talking about the focus of the, the main focus of the area of trade between these 2 countries that they want to talk about as energy. and a lot of the proposed energy projects they have are centered around the arctic as
3:16 am
well as rushes, far east. now they're also expected to be speaking about the ran nuclear deal, as well as preparations for india's presidency of the shanghai cooperation organization. well, despite a lot of pressure from the west, russian india have maintained very close bilateral ties. what areas are they cooperating in the moments? and do you see room for expansion? while the 2 foreign ministers are also expected to discuss joint plans to combat terrorism and also plans to ensure the security of the asia pacific region. but they're also supposed to discuss the security situations of afghanistan, syria, and of course ukraine as well. because after all, india is the 2nd largest market for russia's defense industry. so naturally, this is a sphere of cooperation that's especially critical for these 2 countries. now, it's also important to note that in the run up to these talks,
3:17 am
rushes foreign ministry released a statement saying that both countries are working to create a more fair a more just world order. it said that such a world order would not heed the dictates of imperialist powers. so that really set the tone for this, this meeting and probably for what we're about to here in the press conference a little bit later. we're done. i hope you, you'll keep us posted on developments from those talks a little bit late us ortiz, donald colts, thanks very much or daughter. so row come all built in politics and foreign policy experts also expects the trip to be constructive. visitors very significant such and especially when there is so much of then change at the international level. there might be some more new in this shape or there might be 5 more to do that such and of course and you are very involved. you get to read that to re fi santa divided by 10 and she went on. so strong relationship in relation to our difference,
3:18 am
which is very thought. yeah, really not to jeopardize heart relationship with russia at the false top usa and russia also on the fans. that you will not example by relationship with the united states of america at all. russia not, you know, so i do understand that that is the kind of a on strong terms, both of us in the n b, american ship and relevant gym live when it comes to tackle jake, it's an army and bilateral size. and that's why we are kind of trying to find no russia relationship. and boy, boy, n y s. and the us on the african parliamentary union cause to fight against extremism and terrorism. molly and vicky fossil of agreed to take measures into their own hands. combs,
3:19 am
after western troop involvement failed to pay off from the countries to themselves to try and stabilize the region. the correspondent scrub on the top la has more in the story african countries in the hell are cooperating in the common type of security for years. the region has been and f p center for conflict. and critics, i saying that this is largely due to the actions and in actions of western government . there are currently not enough funds to meet people's ever increasing needs, which compromises the humanitarian relief that can be provided. more than 400000 people are now internally displaced in molly, forced to leave their homes, livestock, and livelihoods behind. and france in particular, has he checked that itself out of a conflict? it promised to quell a decade ago. the situation remains dire. i'm in some of the most brutal fighting in the region. and now many of these countries,
3:20 am
i rejecting cooperation with france and a painting their hopes on a new alliance with russia. perhaps with the new security situation, we will re examine our relations with russia to see if it should be strengthened in one sector or not. and i'm a former french colonies in the for hell are cooperating with each other for the security of the nations. as stated by burkina, faso kept an abraham toward his 1st visit abroad to money. the most important thing for us in the current situation as the security challenge, we came here to share experience on how to strengthen our military cooperation and how to conduct our operations better and to secure the population. this is the main objective of the visit. and while the info alice of the west diminishes, countries like the united states, a being accused of hiding behind the veil of democracy and pluralism as they throw
3:21 am
sanctions at some of the poorest nations in the world. i am taking this step because i have determined that the government of burkina faso has not established or is not making continual progress toward establishing the protection of the rule of law and of political pluralism. this a hell as become a by word for conflict, following years of unceasing fighting and for the millions of displaced people in the region of ed to enjoy the brutality of that conflict. hope for peace, seems untenable. got abolish had 40 in jonathan on new england university scholar eunice, a boob says that western attempts to secure peace in the saw hello, of only exacerbated to the situation on the ground since 2014, when the bar can operations started, things have gone from bad to worse, and then we realized today that this, the way this whole situation has been handled, has led to further the state disintegration,
3:22 am
terrorism chaos. i think this whole country's, it's high time. did they get organized and look for ways to cooperate among each other, to serve their own interest in the interest of their population? i think what happened in molly when, what's happening? i'm booking a parcel is, has some sort of postcolonial reflexive and to says that these countries have, are tied from the, the form of glowing it powers. they haven't seen any positive things coming from all these interventions. and now this switching sized to new partners, maybe they can get better security and better development through these new policies. so it is understandable and staying in africa. western media has slammed the uganda songs in the joint crude oil pipeline project, which could relieve the impacts of the energy crisis on africa with you,
3:23 am
accusing the countries of human rights violations and harming the environments where the pipeline was done that around 1500 kilometers long would help top in so you can, there's massive oil reserves and also supply other countries through the port in neighboring tons and here and helping stabilize oil prices in the region. both back in september, the european parliament votes its issue, a resolution condemning you get the funds in the vote is talking of backlash in the countries which in turn accused the you of a fun things that independence. so as a result of that, the european parliament we thought its approach and overturned its decision. we lighting the project just days before the start of the africa hosted un climate change conference. earlier we spoke to a journalist from the exchange newspaper, who says the pipeline could benefits all parties, but the you doesn't want to have a constructive dialogue due to its own business interest. and the epithet to me
3:24 am
means it is a deli bibs or mission of attention validation, but also support when it comes to energy ambitions in the developing economies. i found it to be a month of business in the matter of economy monopoly because we all know that one of the most biggest import that africa. but also kind of in this case, because on oil, and if you got in touch with me, i would bring the pipeline projects on board and re functioning well. we'll see that number dwindling. and if that number dwindle will could see now it has to be coming if you got any of the stuff can look at. so becoming independent. and i think it's time right now for your can unit itself to have a kind of composition with africa on proper ways. going how we can explore fossil
3:25 am
fuels, but also sub tentatively trans speed from that standpoint to clean energy view and climate change. so it kicks off in egypt on monday with leaders from $120.00 states taking part in it. the organizations secretary general said that the plan is done on the brink of climate hell. one of the main topics on the agenda the conference is addressing the life of funding for the common cause from western states. a recent report by climate foundation, carbon brief, suggests that the u. s. u. k, australia and canada are the leaders in carbon emissions, but failed to pay their fair share. falling 1000000000 short enough, despite these countries being the most vocal supporters of the green narrative, the executive director of the pon, african climate justice alliance says that western states all playing a game of musical chairs with the african counterparts when it comes to climate change. the point here is about the implementation of the commitment and that's why
3:26 am
we was saying this is operable implementation there. but not for me to means we could the admin fee or up the yeah, the mandate in glasgow. a c. s. copenhagen. i've never met it. what we are saying is, as long as we are not to agree this, it would defeat as long as we are, we are, we are trying, we're, we're, we're playing hide and seek game. never to be in this book. this will be like an endless game of new scots. yes. come here. come this. yeah, they've got my, this is that yes, we come down this if that as that next year, i need to midway. science is telling us that we are, we are missing that to me. typically, we didn't mean to be cd us, odd that future generations when dad to vent hastily these people, the lead us who are here pretending that they are taking action. whereas there is nothing bad doing and finally,
3:27 am
the israeli army has declared the hebron home of a well known palestinian human rights activists. a closed military's own. according to the campaigner, the decision was made after he complained israeli forces violently targeted him and his colleagues. his is the arm ro himself, with more details on what happened. i around 10 soldiers came the city, the house, they asked all my friends to leave. they asked my guests to leave and they said that i am the only one was allowed to be in the house. this closure came after a series of attacks from israeli settlers toward them, the house to where the visitors didn't want any kind of, you know, documentation, advocacy. and they don't want our voice to reach the international community to see that is that it is not democracy. and israel is not defending itself, so instead of making the settlers accountable for their violence, the punished us as the victims of the settler violence. they punished us by closing
3:28 am
the house and declared it as a close militarism report. say the decision to turn ambrose house into a closed military zone was taken by israeli army brigade commander jo huda, rizal leo. it's also targets the youth, again, settlements activist group that operates from ambrose home. the renovation plays a key role in rallying locals. participate in non violent protests activist and human rights fender isa. amber again says the palestinians will do everything to confront the order that as a settlers were asking and slunk time to close this house. and they are asking to displace the bill. athenians from h 2 in hebron to we try to do go to the records to wind sometime and to prove that it's a, it's not fair and just legal system that will it, you know, challenge confront. the closed military is on order. we started an international campaign, we started a local campaign,
3:29 am
we are addressing the state department. we are addressing many other auto been a countries or been union and other, you and institution, which is, you know, helping, and usually try to protect human rights defenders. so we'll do our best to challenge confront the order. last is how the world is. look in its 8. sorry i was heaven. the 30 i am moscow time on pizza scott's on the back again with another look at today's biggest stories and around half an hour's time to thank you for watching ah, the supreme court of the united states is there session with rulings on a 2 of the most controversial issues in america, gun ownership, and abortion rights. however, were the decisions by the highest court in the land contradictory. while the case
3:30 am
of god, it took away the rights of a state to decide the legislation regarding concealed carrying a firearms. but in regards to abortion said, it was a decision which should be left to the states. why the difference in today's a 1st edition of that $360.00 view, we're going to look at the issue of abortion rights here in america, with the latest ruling reversing. roe vs wade and making the procedure immediately illegal in 13 states with more expected to follow. but abortion is not just a controversial issue in america, and we will not only look at how abortion is handled by other countries. but why many countries that like the united states have recently changed their policy? i'm scale hughes and join me as we look at abortion and a global context on his inaugural episode of 360 view. ah, abortion is one of the most controversial topics in american culture. oh,
3:31 am
wow. wow. and the supreme court decision had fired up this, a divisive issue, leading to cause for a summer of rage. buildings into see were boarded up after the decision came down. riots erupted outside the supreme court, spilling into streets across america, even shutting down highways. is that this reaction solely unique to america? now we want to take a look around the world at which countries have the most restrictive and most similar laws to america. when it comes to abortion, now, polling shows countries that differ on their opinions of abortion, depending on their culture and their religion. for this report, we want to go to our international correspondent. that's right, scotty. we're seen differences in opinion, an abortion across the world. but 1st,
3:32 am
i want to start with current global abortion loss before the american federal supreme court drove drove versus wait, america had the most lenient abortion loss. if you look at the map created by the center for reproductive rights, you can see america's laws were comparable to most of europe, china, russia, columbia, argentina, turkey, and australia. this countries in blue have the fewest restrictions on abortion. however, let's so mean into china. we're in the past 6 months, the chinese state council has issued guidelines to restrict the number of abortions . china is going through our fertility crisis as the one child policy has led to a male dominated population. now china solution is to restrict abortions and citizens can no longer abort the baby due to it gender. this all began with the one
3:33 am
child policy were families wanting a boy to carry on the family name girls or either ill cared for or died shortly after birth or heated until school age. starting in the 1980s when doctors could predict the sex of the baby before it was born. the number of pre term abortion skyrocketed and has now led to a large male population. in china. in the more rural provinces were 2, children were allowed per family to help on the form. you see a higher number of girls you can see in the map parts of china have i want to for rachel of girls, 2 boys. while the government has did this new sex, selective abortion, prohibition. apple from world public opinion that org, fine, 67 percent of people in china re fair the government leave. these matters to that individual. half of the port countries believe abortion. decisions should be left
3:34 am
up to that individual. this includes 6 countries where abortion is legal, france, great, britain, the united states or crane russia and china. not surprisingly, france and great britain came out with the highest number of in the beatles preferring the government take a hands off approach to abortion. restrictions. france allows abortion on demand up to 16 weeks while britain allows abortion up to 24 weeks. or if the baby will be born with physical or mental handicaps, or will bring physical or mental harm to the mother. but breton also does not require doctor's under duty to perform the surgery. meanwhile, 3 of the countries were the people, one less government involvement have highly restrictive loss. this includes pollen, mexico, and south korea. through, over the years,
3:35 am
mexico's loss had the loosening and now restriction very at the state level. on the other hand, in countries like indonesia, thailand, iran, i, nigeria, people believe the government should restrict abortions, but only indonesia has an overwhelming 60 percent support of the government using criminal enforcement. while 84 percent of nigeria believes in restricting abortion, only half of those 42 per cent in tor don't believe the government should have criminal enforcement. currently, nigeria only allows abortion to save a woman's life. while indonesia only allows abortion to save a woman's life, and in cases of rape or fetal impairment. however, when looking at the sample, these views have substantial differences. when you add religion door, the catholic church is very clear on abortion views and has even turned down certain public figures from accepting communion due to their outspoken support of
3:36 am
abortion, christian pollard showed the most liberal views. 65 per cent are in favor of leaving that association to the individual and only 8 percent support criminal penalties. muslims have the highest percentage of supporting a government's restriction on abortion at 59 percent with 31 percent in favor of the government enacting criminal punishment to enforce abortion restrictions. according to the world public opinion poll, there were no significant differences of opinion in their find is between men and women in the study for 360 view and brooks and us. wow. thank you for that report. now i want to welcome in rural, riling to an attorney and legal and as well. thank you so much for joining us on this new initial show. thank you for having me. it's an honor to be your 1st guess . well, let's talk about this because how has the supreme court decision really,
3:37 am
how is it already impacted the states across the country? well, it's already impacted a number of states because some of them have passed. what we typically refer to as trigger laws. meaning that when an event takes place, it triggers the law in motion. so with the anticipation of this ruling, a number of states passed laws that said if row were to be overturned, that abortion would either be illegal or restricted in certain ways in those particular states. and with the ops decision coming out last week, that wasn't fact, the event that they were referring to that would trigger those laws go into effect . so we already have seen a number of states. the law has changed or certain other states that never repealed old abortion laws. for example, wisconsin had an $849.00 law bidding worship on the books that was never appealed. just wasn't in force while row was supreme court precedent. so that's really what we've seen is that these trigger laws are either already going to affect or have
3:38 am
a timeline where they will be going into effect soon and worry. i found it interesting. these trigger laws were not just passed within this latest legislation . it was 8 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years. and a lot of these people did this, campaign promises this to fulfill a pro life promise. think he ro versus wade would never be overturned. and here we are. and those laws are going to affect. but there are some state judges who are temporarily blocking these abortion bands in some of these states. now, is this legal with the supreme court who is supposed to be obviously the highest court of the lands their decision? and how do you see this playing out? well, i think the short answer your question is that it's complicated. so in many cases, the types of arguments that we're seeing. so louisiana, for example, the trigger law and not state was state. but the reason was because the law was unconstitutionally vague. the plaintiffs there argued that there were a number of laws had conflicting provisions, so it was hard to comply with the law until those ambiguities will result. so in
3:39 am
that sense, yes, it's legal, but it probably does nothing more than by time. while state legislators who are obviously very passionate about their pro life views will respond to what the perceived ambiguities are as a court decision comes out. in contrast, in utah, for example, the plaintiffs there have argued that even though there is not a national constitutional right to abortion, that utah state constitution reserves that right. so the state constitutions very, in terms of what their language specifically says. so that will really vary from state to state in terms of what those specific state constitution say. so for example, in colorado and they didn't include in their state constitution a legal right to abortion, that most states have not done that. but how we interpret things like a right to privacy protection, that is going to be an issue in a lot of these cases. so at this point, in terms of the lawsuits that we have seen, yes, they are legal and it's oftentimes we have
3:40 am
a big precedent like this that changes the legal landscape. the question becomes not what is legal and what does not, but what does the implementation look like and figuring out the details of the implementation can get quite complicated. so that's what we're starting to see now with some of the state court decisions, which when you realize of the supreme court is just based on it's not necessarily on the issue of abortion, but on the 10th amendment. this is exactly how it's supposed to be playing out according to constitution. each individual state making the rules for their land if they have not already. but now we are hearing this pro, abortion is call for a summer of rage. you saw that initially. we even see that building up to the decision from a democratic leaders to a video of a pro lifer who was actually beaten and rushed to the hospital all by a group of antique members. should in this behavior be condemned especially by leaders of the democratic party who are obviously upset with the decision. well, i certainly think that behavior should be condemned. i think that violence should
3:41 am
be condemned in pretty much all instances. and over the past couple of years, we've seen some conflict between what constitutes a protest, obviously there's a constitutional right to protest. and when that protest crosses that line towards violence, and we don't want to promote violence in anna, it's certainly i think leadership starts from the top. so you can certainly have your opinion. you could be angry, you could disagree with that decision. that is absolutely you're right. but i think when you start in flipping violence, entering other citizens in inflicting damage on property, that's the thing that are politicians on all sides, i think should be condemning regardless of circumstance. so as i think so, and yet you're not hearing very much coming out from in fact you've heard a lot of them in the streets, actually encouraging people to take this route. like i said, peaceful, protest protected by the constitution. but this violence is something that i was almost as recently becoming an answer for when you disagree with something,
3:42 am
you actually take the violence into damage and property. but another argument that's come out for pro abortion is this idea of climate change. you know, the fact that they, we have this over populated world studies have shown that a child is one of the worst possible things you can do to the environment. we're not just talking about in your own home that we know a child can rec, within 5 minutes, we're actually talking on the bigger picture. you know, when a child is a big, big deal, how do you think this push towards a greener future has actually impacted possible changes in abortion policy, which is obviously to limit the amount of children that are able to be born. well 1st i just want to say that as a mother of a toddler, yes, i can confirm that. destroy your own home in a matter of minutes. but to get you a, your bigger question about environmental policy. i think that that's certainly a factor and people who are supportive of rights to abortion. they want to appeal to people in any manner that will get them to support their side. and that's true
3:43 am
of any policy argument. so people are not receptive to the traditional arguments about abortion, perhaps they'll be receptive to this is green or planet argument. with that being said, i don't know how much of a factor that truly is, because i think that we've seen people who hold these beliefs. they've been pretty steadfast in their beliefs even before there is this push for greener climate. there are many people who feel that you know, this is a right bodily autonomy. and while i think that this talk of climate change certainly adds to it. i don't think that it's necessarily a game changer. i think that even if that argument were off the table. ready would still be seeing a lot of what we would be seeing today in terms of the arguments for people who are in favor of abortion. so, i mean, yes, i think it's a factor, but i don't think it's a game changer. ok, so one other factor that come out because no one ever expected this to happen.
3:44 am
companies almost immediately are now offering to pay for travel. all this to other states for their employees to get abortions. i have to tell you the working female, my red flags went up on this. and because obviously is this because they just feel bad, they want to take care of their employees. or is it actually because it's cheaper for a government, for a, an employee to, for an employer to actually pay for the employee to have an abortion, rather than actually offer decent maternity paternity leave or any sort of program that makes it a better working environment for working mothers like yourself. well, i think we could certainly have another conversation about what adequate maternity leave looks like. we can do a whole other show about that. so i, well, i get bogged down in the details. there are, well, economics are probably a factor for some companies. i think the bigger factor is we've really seen over the past couple years companies waiting into the culture war in a way that they have not in the years previously. and you look at what has happened
3:45 am
with, with disney in florida. and whereas before, companies didn't want to offend any potential customers, regardless of, of issues that social climate has change. the culture wars have escalated and there is no expectation, i think, particularly with the younger gen, see that companies take a stance on some of these issues. and so i think we're seeing that more and more. i mean, really, i think that the death of george floyd was a turning point in terms of companies waiting into the culture or so i think that this is just, you know, not no exception, that they're continuing to make statements on cultural issues where they would not have before, and this is companies, i think, particularly companies who perhaps are operating in blue or states and want to appeal to the population in the workforce. they're, that's, that's a stance that they're, they're going to take. so, i mean, again, i think that economics certainly play a factor. we think bigger pictures just of corporate landscape has changed. and we now see businesses take stances on controversial issues when that's not something
3:46 am
that they did even just a few years ago. well, obviously things are changing and worry. i appreciate you joining us in lending your legal insight. thanks for joining us. are. and we're going to your short break in ad words. we're going to give you more of the a 360 view on abortion. ah well look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence and the point obviously is to create trust rather than fear i would like to take on various
3:47 am
job with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot most protective phone existence with a 1000 as well. yeah. wow. give easy. wow friend. oh, yeah. or you know it's a one slide. yes. south. yeah. rush south with your doc garza or you know, watch them up all me at that
3:48 am
a bull up i beat them. is emma? yeah. pull video from sure. let me just kim's room. sure thoughts. did you say the why fi ela? a yes, my thought watching in there again. do you watch anybody out? maybe a lot about this morning shows financial. ah, welcome back to you 360 view. i'm your host, scotty. now hughes, now america was founded as a country with the right to choose your religion. but it has historically been founded mainly on christian views. as the country has progressed, these religious views have been pushed out of politics, schools in the home. and how do different religions integrating and these social
3:49 am
pushed to wipe out religious influence? change a population's view on religion? well, we went to bring in political act was itsyana colleague, welcome, and thank you for joining us all the way from london. thank you so much for having me. i'm very excited. ok, so located there in the u. k, you have a lot of the same freedoms in england as americans when it comes to the freedom of expression. would it be strange to see people violently protesting the way they are right now considering the row versus way decision? i think on a see abortion has been legal in the u. k. since about 967. and you can actually still have an abortion here, up to, i believe, 23 weeks into pregnancy, and abortions can only be performed up later on in the stage. then if there is some sort of significant risk to the mother's life, or if there's a fatal fetal abnormality that's detected. but i don't think, you know,
3:50 am
i'm after the roe v wade decision. i think that there has been a lot of misleading just misconception throughout, especially in my generation. i think a lot of people love to jump on the bandwagon of whatever is trending on social media and whatever it is without actually having any sort of basis and understanding and knowledge of this is because this is such a complex issue at the end of the day and it's a very nuanced issue, but i don't think there hasn't been protests that i know of yet. but you know, who knows, who knows it's just started. well, as we were talking about before, even during the break it or whatever starts in the u. k, usually funnels' across the u. s. a few weeks later, this started, this argument has started mainly because probably it's an election year in the united states. you'll see it in a few weeks when parliament of parliament decides to take it up. and i should point out england like america, and most of europe really does have some very lacks abortion laws,
3:51 am
termination of other reg, nancy is up to those 24 weeks or as it would harm the mother. or if the child could possibly be born with a physical or mental disability, a lot of this debate actually came from post. what happened up until the moment of life was what were the debate coming from? now i also ask you about the muslim community, because here a lot of our laws are based off of judeo christian believes. but how does the muslim community actually feel about abortion laws in the u. k. and how do you actually approach it from the muslim perspective? so, you know, as a general consensus, i think muslims view abortion as her arm and it's unlawful and it's forbidden and islam. however, there are a few exceptions. and i think islam is one of those religions that take, that takes the golden mean, if i can say when it comes to this issue. and by which, i mean, basically that it takes the middle path and says that, you know, abortion is permissible up to a certain stage of the pregnancy. and most islamic scholars, i think, would agree that the termination of
3:52 am
a pregnancy for fetal anomalies is allowed before installment. and i'll tell you what i mean by that. but i think you, however, after $120.00 days, abortion is only deemed acceptable if the pregnancy poses any exceeding danger to the mother, or if the fetus is actually examined, to have any sort of abnormality or will, or caught, or, or, you know, if it's possible that it will have any sort of severe disability. but you know, what's really interesting is that even within each school of islamic thought, there is honestly a lot of variance, a lot of disagreement on abortion. and there is a lot of dispute about which circumstances really qualify as an acceptable reason. and this difference, i think of opinion is based on which stage of pregnancy do scholars think that the soul really answers the embryo? so you know, to really answer your question. i think muslims in today's progressive age have so
3:53 am
chair have a much more i think the liberal approach to abortion and the laws in the u. k. tend to mirror that ideology. so, you know, especially especially for the muslim youth that are heavily, heavily influenced by social media and just pop culture. so on the surface level, honestly, i don't think it's a very polarizing issue within the muslim community because i think we'll come from the very ethical background that has instilled a basic moral code within each of us. so in bangladesh, for example, where i'm from, the general consensus among an overwhelming majority of the population will always align more with them cuz i've to principals. if that makes sense, now you are current a london resident. but as you mentioned, you're from bangladesh, which borders indian have knowledge of this culture and india at work. courts have been perceived as a very progressive. more than 70 percent of the abortions in india are because of unplanned pregnancies or health complications and legally admissible reasons. even then a quarter of them actually take place at home, not necessarily in
3:54 am
a facility. how much could a restrictive abortion on the u. s. actually have this ripple effect on access is to services, information choice and resources for abortions in india you've been considering their already very progressive. can i 1st address that there actually are no restrict of abortion laws in the u. s. united ticket that you're obviously referring to, the so called restrictions that have resulted from overturning of roe v wade or the harpy laws those, those were in place even before rose roe vs wade. if you could, your heartbeat and abortion was not certain states had those, those were i'm talking about the restrictions that have been in the u. s. year. right. so you know, i just wanted to address that the roe v wade thing is like the general consensus about roe v wade and what people are deeming it to mean is a complete fallacy. because i think there's a massive misconception because abortion hasn't been bound in the u. s. right. and the reason why roe v wade, i think was overturned,
3:55 am
is because abortion rights were never part of the constitution in the 1st place. so now goes back to obviously each individual state on a case by case circumstance, which means abortion is still at accessible in almost every single state. but this is actually a win for both sides, whether you are pro life, whether you're pro choice and sadly a big win if you, if you believe in democracy. but secondly, i think abortion laws may have a ripple effect in india. but only i think in the metropolitan city areas where people have, you know, become more progressive or they could because because of western ideologies and particularly the american way of life, which is obviously now become like a standard for living amongst a lot of people who live in the cities, but in the rural areas you'll find that, you know, there is, and i saw in the rural areas where most of india and the population reside. they're actually very entrenched in ancient religious morals and values and principles that
3:56 am
so, you know, there isn't always, will be a very strong cultural identity when it comes to foot for the, for the vast majority of the population. you know, tianna kelly. thank you so much for joining us on that very controversial issue and kind of giving us a little perspective of how not only people knew k as well as how the influences might have on other countries. policies such as india, thanks for joining us. thank you. so much who gantski had, like you know, the debate regarding abortion not only here in the united states, but around the world is a combination of environmental and theological influence, which results and government policy. in fact, i cannot think of a controversial a health topic whose legislation is a less to do with science and more about the country's a religious perspective than abortion. maybe this is why we're seeing such radical changes these days. but science does come back into play in regard to preventative options. and will those now become more of
3:57 am
a priority to have access to and by who and let us remember mankind to can only continue if they are fruitful and they multiply. therefore, the challenge for all should be not to figure out how to prevent life rather how to create a world which encourages a good life. i'm sky now. hughes, giving you at the $360.00 view of today's news from around the world. thank you for watching. ah ah, with for the all new business and you will clean the predator b e d. that was chosen yeah, americans, grey you, when you wrote it,
3:58 am
you just got the videos just touching up curriculum can certainly provide you with stuff such and sure. ruckel in was named after of the different student info, which helped with you use their own the with them the problem you're still with yours that are both in the study groups on christopher leaning towards choice thought it was coming to the one off on i thought it was jewish and the longer you bullshit, just a push to, to stream to put him on because of you know, a divorce. look you school of course. i don't know who stevie i know for the don't know if i should just to do with you used to play in finances come up with a more school boys show you the
3:59 am
most. all who are so phobia is in the west. russia is the aggression know his answer much about her. i mean, it wouldn't do too much. dealerships, lowball what we have, any quality for russia and all we gotta do is just feed them over the head and just tell them the right way to live. and there is going to do with a team with nice gloves, with the new share, with
4:00 am
our season. it actually works well with the watch with with american gear up for key mid term elections with the countries economic crisis. the main concern for many me while for the ruling democrats, military support are ukraine, overshadows domestic concerns. also, they saw india foreign minister, meet his russian counterpart on the last the 2 day trip to moscow. discussions on new trade deals on energy project on the table. bike is done the 4th consecutive day of protest after the parent attempt on former pm on con, with demonstrated afloat. the st.

22 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on