a year after noon, a squad, so to handle most of his emotional, specially to with this issue. there's openings and you talk to you with a no one dares to deprive russia it's true, right? to participate in international, multilateral negotiations. china foreign minister, back to russia's position on the international arena on the 1st day of the g. 20 summit. as western members call to further isolate russia over the conflict in ukraine. the un general assembly adopt the resolution on russian war, reparations to ukraine, with dozens of member states abstaining or voting against the initiative in the biggest fall in support for ukraine related resolutions. this is the start of the war with dr. rivers to fulfill the drive is reaching

less and less support in the united nations. it is being shaped as are the news from on the gradient subject. what everybody understands that this is about stealing russian assets. the west must take responsibility for its global polluting activity. that's the call at the top 27, un climate change conference with africa blaming, industrialized nation for today's climate crisis on the continent. with good morning for martine or national studios in moscow, and from wherever you may be watching, i'm fiorella isabel, bringing you the hour's top news stories from around the world. happy to have you with us, overshadowed by rowing tensions. the g. 20 summit in indonesia seats its opening day on tuesday. the world is watching to see whether leaders will be able to agree

on a joint statement as divisions deepen over the conflict and ukraine. the no one dares to deprive russia of it's true, right? that's what chinese for administer, wang ye had to say on western countries trying to prevent russia from taking part in international forums. the statement comes as the minister met with his russian counterpart survey lab ross on the 1st day of the g 20 summit. but also we support russia and its worthy role in the g 20 summit. russia has strong influence in various spheres of cooperation of the world community. no one dares to deprive russia of its true rights participate in international multilateral negotiations. previously, the indonesian president, the host of the summit called on to the members to prevent another cold war. in

turn, the indian prime minister warned against promoting any restrictions on energy supplies and called for insurance. the ability of the market. this comes as this here summit has already seen calls from western members to isolate russia, nevertheless, moscow's cooperation with developing g 20 nations including india and china continues to grow our cheese, maria f, a notion or reports from bali as the some. it starts here in volley. the question rises. what can we expect at its end? the main intrigue of the here is the 20, whether the members will at all be able to come to come from i to the consensus over the final declaration, as the group was torn apart, unprecedentedly by the enormous divisions within the group over how to approach russia ukraine conflict had of the global gathering, the german chancellor pushed and hold on the nation for and i solution of russia

here at this summit, or rather more isolation because that is what the west has been exercising for months now with endless packages of economic sanctions against russia, but it didn't seem to be working and even seems to have the opposite effect as the economies of the united states and western europe are now projected to be declined to. with near for decade, high inflation and rockets in prices for food and energy. you to enter the russia economic sanctions. they, in fact, in the created wild india and china, russia logically trends and ties and corporation with after being pushed towards the east and isolated by the west are on the opposite to become the world's leading economists in the near future. and they seem to only increase trade with russia, some impressive figures for you in the last, in the 1st 8 months. so base here, china is investment in russia showed 150 percent increase compared to the last year

and multiply. and b gene are planning to invest. another $1300000000.00 in joint project, russia, india, bilateral trade, another 130 percent growth in september compared to last year and also ra. she's now emerging has induced top energy supplier in october after the meeting with the russian foreign minister last tuesday. he's aimed in counterpart said that buying oil from russia would be to del, is huge interest and advantage. it is hard fundamental obligation to ensure that the indian consumer has the best possible access on the most advantage. it comes to international market, an inductor aspect of quite honestly, we have seen that a d in daughter. shared relationship has worked to advantage. and other countries want to join breaks and walk all leading, developing countries continues expanding its political and of course,

financial influence with algeria, argentina, and iran. now applying saudi arabia, egypt of gun a son in turkey are very much interested to, along with indonesia that is expected to make a formal application to join here at the g 20. if accepted ricks would become an entity with a g d p 30 percent larger than the united states and in control of 30 percent of global gas reserves, no wonder why the west is so furious and is desperately looking for an escape goat . russia is trying to succeed the global economy. we must join together to stop them in their tracks and restore economic stability at the g. 20 leaders need to step up to fix the weaknesses in the international economic system. which putin has exploited for years. that is actually ironic to here are these allegations as a was the west decision to hobble russian economy by sanctions. but why, when

a didn't go as when the west was quick to blame russia for the collage of the global economy and, and now it seems the us and the u. k. have come up with a perfect plan, how to avoid any responsibility for the economic crash. the ras, or the talking now is the economy will not recover unless the war and restrictions have only been growing. and now, when the western nations are at the data and let's wait and see where the g 20, these here may be able to find to bring any solution. almost half of you and member states abstained or voted against the resolution adopted by the general assembly calling on russia to pay war reparations to ukraine, co sponsored by the united states and its allies. the resolution received the lowest level of support for ukraine related motions since the conflict began. 94

country supported the initiative to hold moscow accountable for violating international law. while 14 nations including china, voted against the resolution, claiming it lacks sufficient legal basis. 73 states, among them, india and brazil chose to abstain. we spoke to dmitri polio on ski, russia's deputy ambassador to the us, who said the resolution lacked a legal basis. the nature of these initiatives, it's not about you crate it. it is being shaped as a resolution on ukrainian subject, but everybody understands that this is about stealing russian assets about some illegal move which is being contemplated in the hands of some western politicians. and it's very difficult to conceal these tools. that's why all the countries that we're considering the draft. so they were absolutely mindful of these double layers of this resolution. and of course,

they were understanding that by prioritizing ukrainian crisis, once again, they risk to put all the other issues on the agenda of united nations in kind of say me, i believe in. and this is a very dangerous times, which is not up held by a lot of member states, as you see from the results of the voting. while some un member states consider the move illegal, others were called western interventions and call no hello, you know it's location which never yielded reparation and justice. our teeth, caleb martin, explains, is certainly significant because since the ukraine conflict escalated, there has certainly been an effectiveness on the part of the united states and mobilizing the world to condemn russia not today. as the vote took place, it became very clear that a number of countries just were not comfortable with this resolution. there were 16

countries that signed a statement pointing out that there are a number of countries around the world that have suffered illegal invasions sanctions, attacks, slavery, colonialism, and that those countries are certainly entitled to reparations. and can talk about iraq. you can talk about vietnam, korea. 2 other countries and those countries have not yet received any reparations for the crimes committed against the, by the united states or it's western allies. however, the reparations should be carried out on a sound legal process. not simply through these resolutions that are just presented randomly to the general assembly. now, the russian ambassador to the u. n. a ben zia he took to the podium and he pointed out that a number of countries simply don't want to go along with what appears to be an attempt to justify the outright daft of russian assets around the world. he also pointed out that the entire basis through which this is being carried out doesn't

fit with un procedures. decisions like this should be made by the un security council, not the general assembly body where the united states took this resolution. here is some more of what the russian ambassador had to say about today's resolution. shibley's 2 pins with inferior already of this initiative is obvious. from a legal point of view, the provisions of the draft to not stand up to any criticism or legally no and void . it's an attempt to legalize what can't be legalized from the point of view of current international law. this is a classic example of the concept of rules based order when a group of states does not act on the basis of international, but seeks to sanctify lawlessness using the authority of the general assembly and positioning it as a judicial body, which by definition, it is not as just close to now, the russian ambassador also pointed out that one of the key deceptions from those supporting the resolution was this claim that somehow the money that was being used

would go to help the ukrainian people. when in reality, the money was going to be used to prolong this conflict to supply ukraine with more weapons, to carry out more military actions and prolong the conflict lead to more killing lead to more death. i. it was a moment where it became clear that the support the united states has had for its efforts to isolate russia or staff to russian assets and unilateral sanctions on russia and attempts to push russia off of the international economy. that support may be faded as the economic consequences of this effort from the united states and this prolonging of a conflict. as the economic consequences become more and more apparent, many countries around the world are starting to ask questions and not have the enthusiasm they may have had once before. dmitri pollyanna k russia's deputy ambassador to the un again believes western attempts to isolate russia are seeing

less support among you and member states. what happened to the, in the year might be a very serious warning for western countries, and they are allies that drive. they are supposed to drive, reaching less and less support than the united nations. they might be disappointed and discouraged by the result. results of today's voting. not only the voting, it's necessary to point out that there was also very unfavorable for them of the beads where developing countries where pronouncing their grievances against the western countries that they were reproaching to them. lack of constructive approach . in other cases, we show where we could involve reparations and the remedy for their actions. so they were saying quite directly that this is a clear example of double standards that the rush they,

the western countries won't to prioritize ukrainian crisis. and to forget about all other crisis situation in the world. so there was a lot of very, very passionate speeches where as simply not the music to the west some years today . and the general assembly whole secret talks between moscow and washington have taken place. center kia according to reports, which were confirmed by will both countries. the meetings were held by high level intelligence officers, including the director of the cia and his russian counterpart. according to the us, the subject was the rising risk of a nuclear conflict and did not directly involve the conflict in ukraine. a u. s. national security spokesperson added that ukraine was breached in advance, and that negotiations would not be held without cabs participation. a spokesperson for the kremlin also confirmed that bilateral talks took place,

adding they were initiated by washington. former c i. a analyst and host of ortiz new showed the whistleblower stock. curious to says such communication is in u. s. interests as americans can afford to provide blank checks to ukraine. talks are always good. it's always better to have a channel of communication open than it is to ignore one another. we can't afford in the united states to just provide a blank check for weapons and weapons systems and materiel indefinitely for the regime in key f, because people don't ukraine. i think that we will see a push for basic talks, both from pressures inside nato and the european union, as well as here in washington within the congress. i think this is a very big deal. and bill burns, the c i, director is far, far more experienced in these kinds of issues than is the secretary of state

himself. tony blinking, he has spent a good part of his career working with russians. the russians know that they can trust him and take him at his word and vice versa. so this was a big deal to send burns and not to send tony blinking. it tells me that the u. s. is serious about keeping this channel of communication open. even if it's indirect through the turks, ah, the industrialized west much answer for the global emissions problems we face today . that's the message raised that the cop 27 you and climate change conference entering its 9th day. we spoke to mohammed and dow, director of the power shift africa, think tank, who said africa needs support from historically polluting western states. if it is to become a leader and green technologies. 2 things we need to understand a continent has the greatest population in the world that it's got into energy.

we have 650000000 africans currently don't have access to electricity. close to a 1000000000 africans don't have access to clinical care. and so it's in our interest to address the limited image excess chunk, but do it in a way that is climate compatible. if you look at the climate change phenomenon, where the continent that is suffering and fussed on lost, and so a transition to renewables and africa becoming a green leader and effectively helped in the well to limit global warming to below 1.5 to can interest only sure way, talk to them to secure our welding and our future prosperity is by transition to renewables, not just in africa, but up close to was included in the historic pollutant countries. i think what we shouldn't month of the historical looters is for finance and clean technology. and i think we should demand that they actually assume responsibility for the hums that they've cost. the climate problem that we're dealing with was largely caused by the

historic emissions in the current so called industrialized countries. until in london, they actually pay the climate debt. we shall use duct opportunity to help paula our sustainable energy access, but also our future development. so that we attract finance on clean technology and use that to help after the explosion. incredible potential for renewables in our continues. while it's at the center of talks that have $27.00 and pushing a green agenda, the west seems to be sidelining problems on the african continent. the question of clean water access is still one of the most pricing topics at the summit. as a round one and a half 1000000000 african still live in areas of high water vulnerability. our teeth, corolla topped law reports, despite the many bodies of waters peppered across the continent, the dams, the rivers, the legs, the valleys, africa continues to suffer from water shortages,

as well as what a borne diseases, water scarcity effects, one in 3 people in the african region is getting worse with population growth, urban ization and increases in household and industrial uses. water scarcity often encourages people to store water in their homes. this can increase the risk of household water contamination and provide breeding grounds for mosquitoes. mosquitoes or carriers of dang, gay fever, malaria, and other diseases. the impact of climate change on water resources from past and current emissions is as clear as mud because water does not fall under the 1992 treaty of the united nations framework convention on climate change. but africa and much of the developing world will be arguing that it does and it should very much form part of the formal agenda. the white water rarely appears in international climate agreements, even though it plays a key role in issues such as food security, energy production,

economic development, and poverty reduction. this potential of water must be explored, given that our actions to reduce global warming a currently lagging behind our ambitions. water does not need to be a problem. it can be part of the solution. water can support efforts to both mitigate and adapt to climate change. from the floods in nigeria to the drought in somalia, in the millions of this place, people will be looking upon this conference asking themselves why it seems to serve the interest of the global north and turning a blind eye to the true realities of climate change on the ground, because more often than not the true impact of climate change is measured through the ability or inability to separate glass of clean drinking water. the problem with africa is said that it's inability to turn its natural resources into a beneficiary value at product. this is

a universal problem across the african continent when it comes to war to use the all parts of africa that extremely well watered, just as the parts of africa that have got very little water like namibia. for example, at the moment the buying issue seems to be agreement around what the temperature increases in weight, what the acceptable temperature official is. that way we forget about the fact that as your temperature changes, so does the ability of b atmosphere to absorb water or from water body change. oh, thing about climate when it comes to water is about how does it change in ambient temperature over time, influenced the distribution of fresh water resources around the planet who benefits? who loses? who pays? this is really what, what the politics of this whole things about the u. s. treasury secretary is

struggling to reassure e. u. partners after washington past a landmark climate law, leaving europeans, a less than thrilled. we are consulting widely with affected groups, including europeans and other countries that have concerns about the law. we are willing, within the limit of the kind of law that congress has passed to work with them to address concerns to the extent that we can. and also to explain the ways in which the law will benefit them, both the white house and the western press keep referring to biden's inflation reduction act as a climate law. so within the u. s, it's mainly being framed as something to help americans with inflation, which is pretty much their main concern right now. but overseas, they're really emphasizing the climate aspect. because who would dare to complain about the so called climate initiative, right? certainly not europe, but french and german officials have caught on to the fact that the new law incentivizes the purchase of american electric vehicles to tax credits and

discriminates against european cars. the car batteries also have to be sourced and made in america. so now europe's talk to economies, france and germany, are not only facing an energy crisis after washington successfully tormented, cutting their own cheap brushing gas supply off. but now washington's trying to use the climate change projects to take a whack at european car manufacturing. maybe u. s. officials figured that europe would be a little more passive. they were certainly led a long way down the garden bath by washington when it came to the ukraine conflict . former french army chiefs of staff general pierre de via, has been publicly saying this recently, basically pointing out that the big vanish fishery of the ukraine conflict is the u . s. and not europe. the war in ukraine is not in the interest of the europeans say that base, certainly not a france sold, but perhaps of the americans shifted more by just going along with washington lead initiatives, whether on the climate or in ukraine, europe, risks becoming

a vassal german weapons manufacturers seemed to be well aware of this. they are worried about germany serving the american defense industry by funding weapons purchased from the u. s. instead of funding weapons to be manufactured in germany or in europe. with regard to german sovereignty, we must ensure that we will not put ourselves completely in the hands of the americans for the next 30 to 50 years. the weapons industry wouldn't be the 1st german industrial sector to take a hit to americas benefit. western sanctions have already hit germany's manufacturing sector to the competitive advantage of the u. s. on the global playing field, as some german politicians have pointed out on these exclaim horn and ag costs. now these extremely high electricity prices have a positive side effect for the us, while our competitiveness is falling. but the exploding energy costs are not the

direct result of the ukraine war. they are the result of the sanctions package, which then started an economic war to which russia responded. gotcha. so if you, us treasury secretary j jaelyn thinks that the biden administration is going to try to convince europe that there is some kind of benefit in all of this. for them, they may succeed in hoodwinking european officials again. but good luck trying to convince the average european citizen e u countries have agreed to introduce new sanctions against it on following protest that of rock the country for months. meanwhile, the iranian government has accused the german chancellor of undiplomatic behavior. as berlin continues to express support for the protesters appears to european union has already adopted a number of sanctions packages. we want to continue to step up the pressure on the revolutionary guard corpse and the political leadership,

my message to the demonstrators and to citizens with iranian roots. here in germany as this, we stand for everything that you are calling for, for human rights and women's rights. we stand shoulder to shoulder with the iranian people. karen has repeatedly accused the united states and israel of being behind the countries unrest. it amy and officials have also blame the german foreign minister for taking an intervention is stands on protest. and you don, after the official said that berlin would not let up in pursuing sanctions over a crackdown on protesters. protests erupted in the country last september, following the death of martha mimi. her family claimed that she was severely beaten while in police custody. the authorities, on the other hand, claimed that she had a heart attack. she had been arrested in toronto by the morality police for not wearing the head scarf properly. protest have continued made ongoing internet restrictions imposed by the government over 2000 people have reportedly been taken

into custody since the demonstration began. political analysts and research for christopher holly thinks that western countries will support anyone regardless of the ideology to promote their interest. this is part of the hybrid warfare that the u. s. u and nato on leaching on the run. this the current batch of her sanctions not only targets individuals and those connected for example with there is your i r g c. but also it targets press tv, which is a media outlet. so it goes to show how bankrupted the european ideas are of freedom of speech and freedom of expression and the media independence. this is the natural reaction to support anybody who's against the governments that are, you know, supporting liberation struggles that are supporting a self determination in the global south against western intervention and western regime change operations. so ultimately, you know, those support anybody,

regardless of the political ideology, we've seen that in their covert support, for example of islamic state and al qaeda and aldosterone in syria. we see that the west, over and over, doesn't really care about anything but its own interest. its own financial gain and its own power and the supremacy in all the regions of the world. so they will support now any protests, regardless of what they're demanding. and those are the hour's top news stories made sure to head over to r t dot com for 247 coverage and video content. and don't forget to follow us on odyssey and rumble. thanks for tuning and we'll see again next hour. ah, ah

ah ah ah

ah, i don't like the united states or the united kingdom have the slightest interest in ukraine itself. said place something to mobilize people around. i think that all tibet laid out their goal was to undermine the russian federation and to jane dominance over russia itself. ah huh. what used to be considered an easy answer and the scientific community has become a quite complicated and modern day society.