their goal is to undermine the russian federation and to gain dominance over russia itself. ah, well, the west pushes it's ukraine agenda most of the well once a peaceful solution. also a message from russia. foreign minister, the ongoing g. 20 summit. the un general assembly adopted resolution on russian war reparations to ukraine, although dozens of member states abstain over to gateway initiative. it's a big, it's for, in support for ukraine related resolution. but since the start of the world, the dr. with dr. reaching less and less important, the united nations is being shaped as a national cranium subject,

but everybody understands that this is about stealing russian acids class. the west must take responsibility for its role in global pollution, half the court. they comp 27 new and climate change conference with africa blaming industrialized nations for the continents climate clients. with that very well, welcome to you from all of our team here in moscow. this is alta international with the very latest news that is good to happy with us. now overshadowed by growing tensions. the g 20 summit opened in indonesia on tuesday. the world is wanting to see if leaders can agree on a closing joint statement as divisions deep over the conflict in ukraine. ah,

most of the world has a note sided with the west on the ukraine conflict, thus a message from the russian foreign minister, his leading moscow's delegation of the g. 20 summit and barley get the latest details. now from our correspondence who's there for? is maria phenomena. maria, good to see you. oh, what were the main point for me? is to say, i love rob made well, many expected this year is d. 20 to be tough for russia ahead of the global gather and here in indonesia is bali longed. and for example, sad that the venue could be used to confront moscow and call out booting. also, we expected to see some extra moves towards even deeper isolation. both political and economic of moscow that was the german transfers appeal. again before this summit officially started on the u. s. also had plans to turn this event into an anti russian platform. it's picking up the press conference that he gave at the end

of the 1st day of the 20 here a foreign minister la rob said that's far from everybody's ready to support this rhetoric dealership for a story. and the answer is very simple. no one except the west and it's close of satellites joined the anti rushes sanctions. it is impossible not to touch on this topic because the west makes a priority to fro the ukrainian situation into any discussion. for 3rd world countries calling for a peaceful settlement for agreements, they know perfectly well with this process is handed by ukraine, which is legally been negotiations with russia. and i have to say, we're heard a lot here proving that the indonesian president, who is the cost of the j 20 summit, has asked the western leaders to tone down their rhetoric against russia. well, china said that rushes so in portals to be excluded from global formats with we support russia and it's where the role in the g 20 summit,

russia has strong influence in various spheres of cooperation of the world's community. no one dares to deprive russia of its true right to participate in international multilateral negotiations with it. it seems that the razor division within the west itself, we more more often hear words such as peace and negotiations from different west and politicians and officials. the new now seems to run out of sanctions imposed on russia. i had a chance to ask for a minister, elaborate whether we actually can take these as an official shaved. and if so, what would we expect? let's take a listen to her gucia. but julia, you never know what's going on in someone else's mind. short periods of mutual understanding with the european union evaporate quickly. just today i had a brief conversation with present mccrendon. a boy reaffirmed his intention to maintain contact with latimer potency, or to find some kind of agreement and resolve the whole situation as he put his to

your voice. i told him once again, all the problems are on the ukrainian side, which categorically refuses any negotiations. and put forward, obviously, unrealistic conditions such all inadequate in this situation. while the main intrigue of this year is g. 20 was and still remains actually, whether its members will at all be able to come to ag compromise. so consensus over the final declaration as the group which brings together 19 of the world's major economies was the you seems to be torn apart by internal divisions over especially how to approach russia, ukraine conflict her survey. la rav told us a little bit about her, how it is go. in the process of preparing these declaration, the document is to be signed on wednesday. and lobrado said that some western countries wanted it to be politicized than they wanted to include. condemnation of

russia's special military operation in ukraine on behalf of the entire group, which is, which would mean actually russia including, which is absurd and was a, did china, saudi arabia and brazil refuse them. so now we have to wait for the end of the summit to see how balanced the final edition of the declaration will be the 1st day of the to day. some it up for this is g 20. maria financial is that covering all the latest for is maria. we really appreciate it. thank you. the russian and chinese foreign ministers have agreed to condemn the latest vote to the un general assembly, which called on moscow to pay reparations to kiss the non binding with him back to resolution receive the lowest international support of any ukraine related dropped at the you with with almost half of the member countries either abstaining or voting down the motion, $94.00 officials, toast,

to support the initiative to quote, hold moscow accountable for violating international law. while 14 nation, including china, voted against the resolution $73.00 states including india and brazil, chose to abstain. moskos deputy ambassador to the un, dimitri polanski told us that resolution is an attempt to legalize the theft of frozen russian assets by the west. the nature of these, the initiates, it's not about to crate it, it. ready is being shaped as a resolution on ukrainian subject, but everybody understands that this is about stealing russian assets about some illegal move which is being contemplated in the hands of some western politicians. and it's very difficult to conceal the still. so that's why all the countries that we're considering the draft, so they were absolutely mindful of these double layers of this resolution. and of course,

they were understanding that by prioritizing ukrainian crisis once again or east to all the other issues on the agenda of united nations in kind of say me, i believe in. and this is a very dangerous trend which is not up held by a lot of member states as you see from the results of the voting well, several human members have called the resolution in legal termination for both i pointed to the failure of western countries to pay reparations to nations there previously explored this colony that he's kind of more pain. expense is certainly significant because since the ukraine conflict escalated, there has certainly been an effectiveness on the part of the united states in mobilizing the world to condemn russia not today. as the vote took place, it became very clear that a number of countries just were not comfortable with this resolution. there were 16

countries that signed a statement pointing out that there are a number of countries around the world that have suffered illegal invasions sanctions, attacks, slavery, colonialism, and that those countries are certainly entitled to reparations. and to talk about iraq, you can talk about the vietnam korea. 2 other countries and those countries have not yet received any reparations for the crimes committed against the, by the united states or it's western allies. however, the reparations to be carried out on a sound legal process. not simply through these resolutions that are just presented randomly to the general assembly. now, the russian ambassador to the you and ben zia, he took to the podium and he pointed out that a number of countries simply don't want to go along with what appears to be an attempt to justify the outright daft of russian assets around the world. he also pointed out that the entire basis through which this is being carried out doesn't

fit with un procedures. decisions like this should be made by the un security council, not the general assembly body where the united states took this resolution. here is some more of what the russian ambassador had to say about today's resolution shibley's to been so to achieve. the inferiority of this initiative is obvious, from a legal point of view, the provisions of the draft to not stand up to any criticism or legally no and void . it's an attempt to legalize what can't be legalized from the point of view of current international law uses. this is a classic example of the concept of rules based order when a group of states does not act on the basis of international, but seeks to sanctify lawlessness using the authority of the general assembly and positioning it as a judicial body, which by definition it is not listed as are corners to now the russian ambassador also pointed out that one of the key deceptions from those supporting the resolution was this claim that somehow the money that was being used would go to

help the ukrainian people when in reality the money was going to be used to prolong this conflict to supply ukraine with more weapons, to carry out more military actions and prolong the conflict lead to more killing lead to more death. i. it was a moment where it became clear that the support the united states has had for its efforts to isolate russia or staff to russian assets and unilateral sanctions on russia attempts to push russia off of the international economy. that support may be fading as the economic consequences of this effort from the united states and this prolonging of a conflict. as the economic consequences become more and more apparent, many countries around the world are starting to ask questions and not have the enthusiasm they may have had once before. rations deputy ambassador to the u. n. o says the western attempt to isolate moscow a thing less support among human members. what happened to be in the year might be

a very serious warning for western countries and their allies that drive. there was a big dr. reaching less and less support than the united nations. they might be disappointed and discouraged where there is the results of today's voting. not only the voting, it's necessary to point out that there was also very unfavorable for them of the beats where developing countries, where pronouncing their grievances against western countries. that they were reproaching to them. lack of constructive approach in other cases where which could involve reparations and the remedy for their actions. so they were saying quite directly that this is a clear example of double standards and that the rush of a, the western countries to prioritize ukrainian crisis. and to forget about

all other crisis situation in the world. so there was a lot of very, very passionate speeches where as simply not the music to the western ears today in the general assembly hall, i think we're talks between moscow and washington have taken place in turkey. and according to report was confirmed by both countries. me things were held between high level intelligence officers, including the director of the c i, a and his russian counsel pause. according to the us, the subjects was the wising risk of a nuclear conflict. and discussions did not directly involve the conflict in ukraine. a us national security spokesperson, i did that. ukraine was briefed in advance on negotiations on the conflict would not be held without kiev participation as folks posted for the crime. and also confirm that bilateral talks took place. i think that they were initiated by washington a full night at c. i a analyst on host of ortiz new show. the whistleblower and

john kerry. okay. say that such communication is in new ethan trusts as americans can't afford to give blank checks to ukraine. talks are always good, it's always better to have a channel of communication open than it is to ignore one another. we can't afford, in the united states to just provide a blank check for weapons and weapon systems and materiel indefinitely for the regime in key f. because people don't ukraine, i think that we will see a push for basic talks, both from pressures inside nato and the european union, as well as here in washington within the congress. i think this is a very big deal. and bill burns, the c i a director is far, far more experienced in these kinds of issues than is the secretary of state himself. tony blinking, he has spent a good part of his career working with russians. the russians know that they can

trust him and take him at his word and vice versa. so this was a big deal to send burns and not to send tony blinking. it tells me that the u. s. is serious about keeping this channel of communication open. even if it's indirect through the turks, ah, the industrialized west must dance if and the global emissions problems we face today. that's a message from the cop 27. you and climate change conference entering is 9th day. we spoke to mohammed at dow, the director of the power shift to emerge, africa, think tankers that, that the continent need support from the west. if it's to become a leader in clean technologies. 2 things we need to understand. our continent has the greatest population in the world that is currently energy. we have 650000000 africans. currently don't have access to electricity. close to

a 1000000000 africans don't have access to clinical care. and so it's in our interest to address the limited image access challenge, but do it in a way that is climate compatible. if we look at the climate change phenomenon, where the continent that is suffering fussed on lost, and so a transition to renewables and africa becoming a green leader and effectively helping the well to limit global warming to below 1.5 degrees interest. the only sure way talk to the secure our welding and our future prosperity is by transition to renewables, not just in africa, but our close to was included in the historic pollutant countries. i think what we should demand of the historic pollutants is for finance and clean technology. i think we should demand that they actually assume responsibility for the hums that they've cost. the climate problem that we're dealing with was largely caused by the historic emissions in the current so called industrialized countries. and so in london that they actually pay the climate debt. we shall use duct opportunity to

help paula a sustainable energy access, but also our future development so that we attract finance on clean technology. i knew that to help us to exploit incredible potential for renewables in our continues, while the west southeast center of cop 27 talks and pushing a green agenda, it seems to be sidelining problems on the african continent. the question of clean was access remains. one of the summits most pressing topics is around one and a half 1000000000 africans still live in areas of high water vulnerability ortiz corolla hotline reports. despite the many bodies of waters peppered across the continent, the dams, the rivers, the legs, the valleys, africa continues to suffer from water shortages as well as what a borne diseases. water scarcity affects one in 3 people in the african region and is getting worse with population growth, urban ization,

and increases in household and industrial uses. water scarcity often encourages people to store water in their homes. this can increase the risk of household water contamination and provide breeding grounds for mosquitoes. mosquitoes or carriers of dang, gay fever, malaria, and other diseases. the impact of climate change on water resources from past and current emissions is as clear as mud because water does not fall under the 1992 treaty of the united nations framework convention on climate change. but africa and much of the developing world will be arguing that it does and it should very much form part of the formal agenda. the white water rarely appears in international climate agreements, even though it plays a key role in issues such as food security, energy production, economic development, and poverty reduction. this potential of water must be explored, given that our actions to reduce global warming a currently lagging behind our ambitions. water does not need to be

a problem. it can be part of the solution. water can support efforts to both mitigate and adapt to climate change. from the floods in nigeria to the drought in somalia, in the millions of this place, people will be looking upon this conference asking themselves why it seems to serve the interests of the globe o north and turning a blind eye to the true realities of climate change on the ground, because more often than not, the true impact of climate change is measured through the ability or inability to separate glass of clean drinking water. the problem with africa is said that it's inability to tune each natural resources into a beneficiary to of value and product. this is a universal proper problem across the african continent when it comes to water. yes, they are parts of africa that extremely well watered, just as the parts of africa,

that of what the little water like libya, for example, you, at the moment the buying issue seems to be agreement around what the temperature increases in weight, what the acceptable temperature official is that way we forget about the fact that as your temperature changes, so does the ability o b, o at the sphere to absorb water off of auto body change? oh thing about climate when it comes to water is about how does it change in ambient temperature? over time, influenced the distribution of fresh water resources around the planet who benefits? who loses? who pays? this is really what, what the politics of this whole things about. the us treasury thank was harry is struggling to whistle you partners after washington past the landmark climate law that left europeans less than thrilled. we are consulting widely with affected

groups, including europeans and other countries that have concerns about the law. we are willing, within the limit of the kind of law that congress has passed to work with them to address concerns to the extent that we can. and also to explain the ways in which the law will benefit them. though the white house in the western press keep referring to biden's inflation reduction act as a climate law. so within the u. s, it's mainly being framed as something to help americans with inflation, which is pretty much their main concern right now. but overseas, they're really emphasizing the climate aspect because who would dare to complain about the so called climate initiative, right? certainly not europe, but french and german officials have caught on to the fact that the new law incentivizes the purchase of american electric vehicles through tax credits and discriminates against european cars. the car batteries also have to be sourced and made in america. so now europe's talk to economies, france and germany,

are not only facing an energy crisis after washington successfully talk, commended, cutting their own, she brushing gas supply off. but now washington's trying to use the climate change projects to take a whack at european car manufacturing. maybe u. s. officials figured that europe would be a little more passive. they were certainly led a long way down the garden path by washington when it came to the ukraine conflict . former french army chiefs of staff general pierre de via, has been publicly saying this recently, basically pointing out that the big beneficiary of the ukraine conflict is the u. s . and not europe. the war in ukraine is not in the interest of the europeans say that based certainly not a france sold, but perhaps of the americans shifted more by just going along with washington lead initiatives, whether on the climate or in ukraine, europe, risks becoming a vassal german weapons manufacturers seem to be well aware of this. they're worried about germany serving the american defense industry by funding weapons

purchased from the u. s. instead of funding weapons to be manufactured in germany or in europe. with regard to german sovereignty, we must ensure that we will not put ourselves completely in the hands of the americans for the next 30 to 50 years. the weapons industry wouldn't be the 1st german industrial sector to take a hit to americas benefit. western sanctions have already hit germany's manufacturing sector to the competitive advantage of the u. s. on the global playing field, as some german politicians have pointed out on these exclaim horn and ag costs. now these extremely high electricity prices have a positive side effect for the us, while our competitiveness is falling into place. but the, exploding energy costs are not the direct result of the ukraine war, cause they are the result of the sanctions package, which then started an economic war to which russia responded and built shafts. so

if you, us treasury secretary j jaelyn thinks that the biden administration is going to try to convince europe that there is some kind of benefit in all of this. for them, they may succeed in hoodwinking european officials again. but good luck trying to convince the average european citizen a country's allegory, to introduce new sanctions against a wrong following months of protests in the country may walter ron has accused the german chancellor of under platonic behavior. as berlin continues to express support for the protest us, your pistol to european union has already adopted a number of sanctions packages. we want to continue to step up the pressure on the revolutionary guard corpse and the political leadership. my message to the demonstrators and to citizens with iranian roots. here in germany is this. we stand for everything that you are calling for, for human rights and women's rights. we stand shoulder to shoulder with the iranian

people. to run has repeatedly accused the united states and as well as being behind the countries on rest, a rating official, civils. i blamed the german foreign minister, i taking an interventionist, stong on protests. after the official said berlin would not let up in pursuing sanctions. i have a crackdown on protest as a protest, sir. up in the country last september, following the death of a young woman in custody. a family claim. she was severely beaten malo. dorothy stacy had a historical condition that led to a heart attack over 2000 people have appointed he been taken into custody. political analyst sandra, such a christopher halle thinks western countries will support anyone regardless of ideology, to promote their cell phone track. this is part of the hybrid warfare that the u. s . u and nato on leaching on your, on this the current batch of sanctions not only targets individuals and those connected for example, with your i r g c. but also it targets press tv,

which is a media outlet. so it goes to show how bankrupted the european ideas are of freedom of speech and freedom of expression and the media independence. this is the natural reaction to support anybody who's against the governments that are, you know, supporting liberation struggles that are supporting as self determination in the global south against western intervention and western regime change operations. so ultimately, you know, those support anybody, regardless of the political ideology, we've seen that in their covert support, for example of islamic state and al qaeda. and now lou srp in syria, we see that the west, over and over, doesn't really care about anything but its own interest, its own financial gain and its own power and the supremacy in all the regions of the world. so they will support now any protest, regardless of what they're demanding me,

thanks for joining us. how naughty international went back in the top of the hour with the very latest news update. we'll see you then. mm hm. ah ah, don't think that the united states or the united kingdom had the slightest interest in ukraine itself. that shed way something to mobilize people around. i think that all about laid out their lowest undermine the russian federation and job to jane dominance over russia itself.

awe on november, the 3rd 1945, just a month after the war ended, the u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 and select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. as the u. s. s all was devastated by wal united states last about 400000 people at the brit sloss less than the americans did. and the soviet suffered 27000000 deaths. mm mm. 27000000 is an incredible number. quite john

kennedy, american university of commencement address invitees. 63, he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 is the equivalent of the entire united states. east of chicago. have you been destroyed? mm hm. initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan over time it evolved into pincher bush, lack of crankshaft, half moon coke wheel off tackle. and sherry idea, december 19th, 1949 saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets operation. dropshot, date of attack, january the 1st 1957. the plan outlined the complete annihilation of the usaa under the democratic guise of liberating the nations from communism. but those very nations would be

wiped out along with communism. in the 1st phase of alteration, dropshot and visits dropping 300 nuclear and 250000 tons of conventional bombs on the soviet union. in 100 soviet cities were pre selected as targets. the 2nd phase, the ussr is attacked by 250 nato divisions. soviet thought so taken over by nato naval forces. the 3rd phase, annihilating the usaa, wiping it off the world map. to that end, all new weapon types that to be deployed nuclear, chemical, radiological, and biological as well as small items. the final phase breaking the ussr into full.