a super school that did you, do you put up a list of all, but each with ah ah, the headlines on autopay international? well, the went pushes its ukraine agenda, most of the wild ones that peaceful solution. that's the message from russian foreign minister at the ongoing g. 20 summit. but un general assembly adopt the resolution on russian war, reparations to ukraine over dozens of member states, abstain. once again, the initiative is the biggest fall in the ukraine related resolutions since the start of the war. the dr with dr. reaching

less and less support in the united nations. it is being shaped as a resolution long ukrainian subject. what everybody understands that this is about stealing russian assets, that the west must take responsibility for its role in global pollution. that's the call it the cub 27. you and climate change conference with africa blaming industrialized nations for the continent. climate crisis with a very well and welcome to you from all of our team here in moscow. this is not the international with the very latest news update. i shot out by growing tension. the g 20 summit opened in indonesia on choose day. well, it is war tank to say of leaders can agree on a closing joint statement as divisions deepen over the conflict in ukraine. the

well, most of the world has not cited with the west of the ukraine. conflicts pass the message from the russian foreign minister, his leading moscow delegation at the g. 20 summit in bali of correspondence. maria phenomenal. is that for us? well, many expected this year is d. 20 to be tough for russia ahead of the global gathering here in indonesia is bali longdon, for example. sad that the venue could be used to confront moscow and call out booting. also, we expected to see some extra moves towards even deeper isolation, both political and economic of moscow. that was the german tensile as appeal again before they summoned officially started on the u. s. also had plans to turn this event into an anti russian platform. it's picking up the press conference that he gave at the end of the 1st day of the 20 here, a foreign minister, la rog, sad that's far from everybody's ready to support this rhetoric pushing for

a story. and the answer is very simple. no one except the west and its close of satellites joined the anti rushes sanctions. it is impossible not to touch on this topic because the west makes a priority to fro the ukrainian situation into any discussion. for 3rd world countries, a calling for a peaceful settlement for agreement, the know perfectly well with this process is handed by ukraine, which is legally been negotiations with russia. and i have to say, we're heard a lot here proving that the indonesian president, who is the cost of the j 20 summit, has asked the western leaders to tone down their rhetoric against russia. well, china said that russia too important to be excluded from global forum rights. for years. we support russia and it's where the role in the g 20 summit russia has strong influence in various spheres of cooperation of the world's community. no one dares to deprive russia of its true right to participate in international multilateral negotiations. it seems that the razor division within the west itself,

we more and more often hear words such as peace and negotiations from different west and politicians and officials. the new now seems to run out of sanctions imposed on russia. i had a chance to ask for a so la, rob, whether we actually can take this as an official shape. and if so, what could we expect? let's take a listen. j gucia. but you don't, you, you never know what's going on in someone else's mind. short periods of mutual understanding with the european union evaporate quickly. just today i had a brief conversation with president micron, reaffirmed his intention to maintain contact with vladimir potent to find some kind of agreement and resolve the whole situation as he put it through force. i told him once again, all the problems are on the ukrainian side, which categorically refuses any negotiations and put forward obviously, unrealistic conditions such are inadequate in this situation. the man intrigue of

this year is to 20 was and still remains whether hates members will be at all able to come to a consensus over the final declaration as the group which brings together 19 of the world's major economists lost the u is torn apart by internal divisions over how to approach russia, ukraine conflict, the document used to be signed on wednesday in sydney, law, voracious foreign minister said that some western countries wanted this document to be politicized. and they wanted to include condemnation of russia's special military operation in ukraine on behalf of the entire group. that would mean russia included in that as absurd, of course, was indo china. saudi arabian brazil refused to move and they refused to accept this condemnation. so now we have to wait for the end of the summit here to see what the final edition of the declaration will look like. the russian and chinese foreign ministers have agreed to condemn the latest foe to the un

general assembly, which called on moscow to pay reparations to care of the non binding western backed resolution, received the lowest international support of any credit related draft at the u. n. with almost half of the member countries either abstaining voting down the motion. online he for officials chose to support the initiative to quote, a hold moscow accountable for violating international law. well, 14 nation, including china, voted against the resolution $73.00 states including india and brazil chose to abstain moscow's deputy ambassador to the un, dimitri pollyanna. he told us the resolution is an attempt to legalize the theft of frozen russian assets by the west. the nature of this initiative, it's not about you crate it. it is being shaped as a resolution on ukrainian subject. what everybody understands that this is about stealing russian assets about some illegal move which is being contemplated in the

hands of some western politicians. and it's very difficult to conceal these tools. that's why all the, the countries that we're considering the draft. so they were absolutely mindful of these double layers of this resolution. and of course, they were understanding that by prioritizing ukrainian crisis, once again, a risk to all the other issues on the agenda of united nations in kind of say me, i believe. and this is a very dangerous trend which is not a held by a lot of a member states, as you see from the results of the role to a while. several un numbers have called the resolution a legal. some nations have also pointed to the failure of western countries to pay reparations to nations that previously exploded as colonies as on teeth. chemical explains,

this is certainly significant because since the ukraine conflict escalated, there has certainly been an effectiveness on the part of the united states and mobilizing the world to condemn russia not today. as the vote took place, it became very clear that a number of countries just were not comfortable with this resolution. there were 16 countries that signed a statement pointing out that there are a number of countries around the world that have suffered illegal invasions sanctions, attacks, slavery, colonialism, and that those countries are certainly entitled to reparations. and can talk about iraq. you can talk about the vietnam korea. 2 other countries and those countries have not yet received any reparations for the crimes committed against the, by the united states or it's western allies. however, the reparations should be carried out on a sound legal process. not simply through these resolutions that are just presented randomly to the general assembly. now,

the russian ambassador to the u. n. a benzo. yeah, he took to the podium and he pointed out that a number of countries simply don't want to go along with what appears to be an attempt to justify the outright daft of russian assets around the world. he also pointed out that the entire basis through which this is being carried out doesn't fit with un procedures. decisions like this should be made by the un security council, not the general assembly body where the united states took this resolution. here is some more of what the russian ambassador had to say about today's resolution shibley's to pin. so to achieve inferiority of this initiative is obvious from a legal point of view, the provisions of the draft to not stand up to any criticism or legally and void. it's an attempt to legalize what can't be legalized from the point of view of current international law used to show this is a classic example of the concept of rules faced order when a group of states does not act on the basis of international law,

but seeks to sanctify lawlessness using the authority of the general assembly and positioning it as a judicial body, which by definition, it is not previous owners just now the russian baster also pointed out that one of the key deceptions from those supporting the radical illusion was this claim that somehow the money that was being used would go to help the ukrainian people, when in reality, the money was going to be used to prolong the conflicts to supply ukraine with more weapons, to carry out more military action than in for along the conflict lead to more killing lead to more dep. it was a moment where it became clear that the support the united states has had for his efforts to isolate russia or staff. the russian asked that that unilateral sanctions on russia attempts to push russia off of the international economy, that support may be faded as the economic consequences of this effort from the united states and this prolonging of

a conflict. as the economic consequences become more and more apparent, many countries around the world are starting to ask questions and not have the enthusiasm they may have had once before. well, russia is deputy ambassador to the you and also say is the western attempts to isolate moscow a thing less support among us members? what happened to be in the year might be a very serious warning for western countries, and they are allies that drive. there was a big dr. reaching less and less support than the united nations. they might be disappointed and discouraged by the result. results of today's voting. not only the voting, it's necessary to point out that there was also very unfavorable for them of the beads where developing countries where pronouncing their grievances against western countries that they were murray approaching to them. lack of constructive approach

. in other cases, we show where we didn't build reparations on the remedy for their actual. so they were saying quite directly that this is a clear example of double standards that the rush they, the western countries won't to prioritize ukrainian crisis. and to forget about all other crisis situation in the world. so there was a lot of very, very passionate speeches where absolutely not the music to the west some years today. and the general assembly whole top us defense official suggest ukraine would be better narrowing. it goes on cementing we saw military gains at the bargaining table with moscow, and that however hasn't stopped nato secretary general from insisting ukraine should continue fighting ukraine us. they said they're ready to negotiate. but to also of course, no,

that's the only way to achieve the acceptable outcome for them is that to have the strength on the battlefield. so what we should do is to support ukraine and to strengthen their hand while our to contribute to rachel martha and joins me with more details on this. rachel, nice to see if there was a split in the west on ukraine's future here. and what's with stoughton bergs? hawkins stones? yeah, well i'd like to know who made young stilton burke, the ultimate voice of authority on military conflict. what's his actual battlefield experience? the guy served his norwegian, mandatory military service at an infantry training school. his background is in journalism and politics. he's no general and more of an arm chair general, the rose through the ranks of the 1st battalion of desk jockeys to head up the nato bureaucracy. so who exactly is still timbered? speaking for here, which actual military experts have giving us some name so we can assess and decide

for ourselves if they are credible or is he just speaking for other bureaucrats and politicians like himself because his opinion is absolutely in contradiction with the view of general mark milly, that chairman of the u. s. joint chiefs of staff who said recently in the western press that it's time to sit down and talk. milly also said quote, we've seen the ukranian military fight the russian military to a standstill. now what the future holds is not known with any degree of certainty, but we think there are some possibilities here for some diplomatic solutions. retired us army colonel douglas mcgregor, who was the talk planner for general wesley clark, when he was nato commander. and who has actually seen battle in iraq and elsewhere, unlike stilton berg, who may or may not have gone to war with the photocopier and ended up with a paper kite is also saying that negotiation is the best off ramp you grin. hands

are in bad shape. they're not prepared for what's coming. the russian so now repeatedly at night demonstrated their ability to target precisely energy, fuel, transportation, and so forth. he knows that the ukrainians are running out of those things. it won't be long before they run out of food. it won't be long before they're freezing . it's time to negotiate. but unlike pentagon officials, the american national security bureaucracy seems to be dominated by those grasping at any excuse, like the recent russian withdraw in curse on to keep the action going on the battlefield. it's the pentagon officials who are focusing more on taking into account all of the lives lost and made the intense fight inc, her song. and you see it not as a victory, but instead as a potentially bad sign of more deadly fighting to come. why not start talking about

peace talks before you throw another 100000 lives into the abyss. over here in europe, we keep hearing the matter from politicians that ukraine should decide if and when it wants. peace. british defense minister ben wallace apparently wants the west to continue to enable it. keeps efforts to fight russia down to the last ukrainian until zalinski decides. otherwise, we won't ukraine to be able to discuss or resolve this issue from a position of strength, not a position of weakness, and thus is the current direction of trouble. oh, you know is gonna be absolutely thrilled to hear that the arms industry, which has spent over a $100000000.00 on lobbying this year to date. but these faceless war profiteers and their lobbyists aren't accountable to voters or to anyone except maybe their shareholders. just like no one elected yen stoughton berg or any one else involved

in these bureaucracies who are adamant in their refusal to take a chance on peace. it really does seem like the less skin they have in the game, the more radical they are in their position against negotiations and in favor of continuing on the battlefield may thank flat rate, thou thought they contribute to rachel moss in the industrialized west mouse dancer for the global emissions problems we face today. that's a message from the cop 27, un climate change conference. we spoke to mohamad, dial the director of the power shift africa, the thing time. can you said that the continent need support from the west? if it's to become a leader in green technologies? 2 things we need to understand. our continent has the greatest population in the world that it's currently in the pool. we have 650000000 africans currently don't have access to electricity close to

a 1000000000 africans don't have access to clinical care. and so it's in our interest to address the limited image access challenge. but do it in a way that is climate compatible. if you look at the, the climate change phenomenon, where the continent that is suffering fussed on lost, and so a transition to renewables and africa becoming a green leader and effectively helping the well to limit global warming to below $1.00 to can interest only sure way to actually secure our wellbeing and our future flows party is by transition to renewables, not just in africa, but across the world included into his total pollutant countries. i think what we should demand of the historical looters is for finance and clean technology. i think we should demand that they actually assume responsibility for the hums that they've cost. the climate problem that we're dealing with was largely caused by the historic emissions in the current so called industrialized countries. and so in london that they actually pay the climate debt. we shall use that opportunity to

help paula a sustainable energy access, but also our future development so that we attract finance on clean technology and use that to help actual exploit incredible potential for renewables in our continent. well, the west's at the center of cop 27 talks and pushing a green agenda and seems to be fine lining problems on the african continent. the question of clean water access remains one of the summits most pressing topics as around one and a half 1000000000 african still live in areas of high waters like mobility ortiz corroborate, it's hot lab reports. despite the many bodies of waters peppered across the continent, the dams, the rivers, the legs, the valleys, africa continues to suffer from water shortages as well as what a borne diseases, water scarcity effects, one in 3 people in the african region and is getting worse with population growth urban, ization, and increases in household and industrial uses. water scarcity often encourages

people to store water in their homes. this can increase the risk of household water contamination and provide breeding grounds for mosquitoes. mosquitoes or carriers of dang, gay fever, malaria, and other diseases. the impact of climate change on water resources from past and current emissions is as clear as mud because water does not fall under the 1992 treaty of the united nations framework convention on climate change. but africa and much of the developing world will be arguing that it does and it should very much form part of the formal agenda. the white water rarely appears in international climate agreements, even though it plays a key role in issues such as food security, energy production, economic development, and poverty reduction. this potential of water must be explored, given that our actions to reduce global warming a currently lagging behind our ambitions. water does not need to be

a problem. it can be part of a solution. water can support efforts to both mitigate and adapt to climate change . from the floods in nigeria to the drought in somalia, in the millions of displays, people will be looking upon this conference asking themselves why it seems to serve the interest of the global north and turning a blind eye to the true realities of climate change on the ground because more often than not the true impact of climate change is measured through the ability or inability to separate glass of clean drinking water. the problem with africa is so that it's inability to tune each natural resources into a beneficiary to of value and product. this is a universal, proper problem across the african continent when it comes to war to use the all parts of africa that extremely well watered, just as the parts of africa, that of what the little water libya for example,

you at the moment the buying issue seems to be agreement around what the temperature increases in weight, what the acceptable temperature official is. that way we forget about the fact that as your temperature changes, so does the ability or b o atmosphere to absorb water off of auto body change. oh, thing about climate when it comes to water is about how does it change ambient temperature over time influenced the distribution of fresh water resources around the planet who benefits who loses pies? this is really what, what the politics of this whole things about your countries had agreed to introduce new sanctions against the iran following months of protests in the country. meanwhile, to run the case, the german chancellor then diplomatic behavior has been and continues to express support for the protest. this the patient, european union has already adopted

a number of sanctions packages. we want to continue to step up the pressure on the revolutionary guard corpse and the political leadership, my message to the demonstrators and to citizens with iranian roots. here in germany is this. we stand for everything that you are calling for, for human rights and women's rights. we stand shoulder to shoulder with the iranian people. so rob has repeatedly accused the united states and as well as being behind the countries on west reigning official, zable for planes. the german foreign minister for taking an interventionist stance on protests of the official said berlin would not let up in pursuing sanctions over a quack down on protest. this will protest throughout the country last september, following the death of a young woman in custody family claim. she was severely beaten model, dorothy said she had a historical condition that led to a heart attack of the 2000 people have been taken into custody, political analysts,

and with quincy. so how long these things the western countries will support anyone, regardless of ideology to promote something. this is part of the hybrid warfare that you and nato are leasing on the run. the current batch of sanctions not only targets individuals and those connected, for example with your higher g p. but also target press tv, which is a media outlet. so it goes to show how bankrupted the european ideas are of freedom of speech and freedom of expression in the media independence. this is the natural reaction to support anybody who's against the governments that are, you know, supporting liberation struggles that are supporting. that's up to the nation in the global south against western intervention and western regime change operation. so ultimately, you know, does support anybody, regardless of the political ideology, we've seen that in their covert support for and full of islamic state and al qaeda

and i lose stress in syria. we see that the west, over and over, doesn't really care about anything but its own interests, its own financial gain and its own power and the supremacy in all the regions of the world. so they will support now any protest, regardless of what they're demanding. monday, thanks for joining us. there are not international as always. plenty more updates to be found on our website. i v dot com that we're back in 30 minutes with ah with

what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms. race is often very dramatic. development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical time time to sit down and talk with

ah no one. no, sir, no, not a joke. no, no. what go more shrill than what they should end up? unit 73. 1 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short and build the most powerful and most deadly biological weapons program that the world had every now and will not to production it, it gives you or she'll book a dinner. good on you son,

new rochelle. he on more, more general manager thought this is meant new again from all one of our new and i got the much sale. i got ya know, i got on monday. i wish to know about joey. ho knew he didn't or gotten more or less than a jr. let's i had to put up with an all everybody bill could. you could help us out. nice. oh boy, that's good to go on. what the on the wow she my a new on it. i'm all i can send more on all said mom. good. so you don't the you you love or put them i don't think give us a

with with ah hello and welcome to worlds apart. the americans never had a problem starting wars, especially far away from their shores, but putting in that to them has often been a bloody mass barely hear after it's disgraceful pull out of gas sunday. but an administration got itself involved in the ukrainian conflict with no formulated exit strategy at this point. are there any better options to finalizing this conflict than at that end wars the end of the world? well, to discuss it, i'm now joined by richard black, former virginia states senator and returned to us army colonel sen. it's a great on a great pleasure for me to talk to you. thank you very much for giving us this up

and change it. well, thank you. i'm very pleased to be where we're here on. i'm very concerned about the branch that are taking place and so look forward to our discussion. now, before we got to the details of the current confrontation, i want to give our viewers a little bit of a sense of who you were in your active military life. and i know that before becoming an elected official, you spend 32 years in uniform 1st as in marine pilot them down as an army lawyer. and i guess it's no surprise, a man who saw wars up close and personal would be concerned about them. but i wonder if i in, you'll be you'd, the ukrainian conflict stands out in any way from all the other wars that the united states has been involved in. well, this is a very intense war. and.