a 2nd you stop to with the girl who's ah fallen says it's con, confirm who is behind a deadly method lost on its border with ukraine. moscow called the explosions of provocation, aimed at escalating regional tensions. then it's nothing to do with all the rest. it's unlikely the messiah was fired by russia due to its trajectory. lots of nato states have already called for article 5 to be implemented, triggering a collective military response is caught from 7 continues. africa accuses

western countries are trying to install trillions of dollars to pay for global emissions. the continent, it least responsible for africa has an opportunity to be a lead. i'm due to their own economies without following they took up with it's one minutes past midday. in the russian capital money is peter scott's been here is how the world looking this wednesday and lunch time. welcome to the program . the poland says it has no evidence of who was behind a missile strike the kill 2 people near its border with ukraine. moscow says the fragments reportedly found at the site do not resemble any rockets currently used by military. although many western media outlets have been pointing the finger at russia, ortiz america, steve has more. poland caused quite a scant internationally had world war 3 in nato. and the world trending on social

media, people were genuinely afraid that this could be to another escalation, and poland never one to to, to miss an opportunity to antagonize russia has now been playing with was saying that this is a russian made me saw likely a russian attack, despite all manner of inconsistencies. now, however, poland is saying that it has no information about where the miss up could have come from. who could have launched it. nevertheless, the russian military has come out and has had said that this is all nonsense, and that the media is playing with fire. stevens by polish media and officials about an alleged russian missile strike, or a deliberate provocation, aimed at escalating the situation. the russian military has not conducted any strike on a target near the ukrainian polish border. the fragments shown by the polish media

do not pertain to russian weaponry in any way. you have the b, b, c. for example, for example, come out and say trumpet poems, position rising a headline, sing russian missile lands in poland. rapport. and there's, there's very little by way of, you know, a investigation or whatever else all we had to go by was a couple of blurry pictures of fragments, apparently reportedly of the wreckage. but even that was quickly de bugs. you had news outlets in conjunction with various military experts. come out and say, look, this, this is a mess. $300.00 miss allan and t m is all the oh would, would probably belong, belong to ukraine. that this was an errand massage. launched by ukraine. they even went to the specifics, they identified that the engine fragment in the picture was the 4086 engine of the a 5 v 55 as 300 ag miss out which ease station in

the awesome oversight of ukraine, which ukraine has actively used pulling quickly changed position saying, you know, this is a russian made miss al, which is of course a play with was this miss, i was like, you made in the soviet union of which ukraine was also part of. so you could equally say that this is a ukrainian made miss up. there's again, all manner of and inconsistencies we have the pictures, for example of, of, of the crater, apparently caused by the missile. and again, it doesn't match the sheer power of a russian cruise missile, or, or jet law launched x one or one miss out at which russia used in the, in the wide strikes we saw faster than critical infrastructure sites and i, in ukraine. i as a consequence of which much of ukraine experienced blackouts, there are power shortages all over all over the country. but the further strike was a near revoke. a city that is

a 100 kilometers away from the are from the polish border, which is where fragments of that. michelle f l i. e, you have, you have the united states are also coming out casting down in poland, a version of events. nevertheless, poland seems a desperate for this month to continue to continue with this strike to try to pin some measure of blame on russia despite all this new information coming out of pointing again at ukrainian air defenses. bowlens military remains on high alerts and the country's leaders in concerts with fellow nato members about the incidents which while the polish presence has called for. com. nato allies in the baltics of accused russia of directly attacking the block uncalled for an immediate reaction. russian miss south, hidden the territory of the ne to members a very dangerous escalation by the kremlin. lach bay expresses full solidarity with our ally, poland,

and will support any action deemed appropriate by poland. russia will bear full responsibility for all the consequences. latest news from poland is most concerning . we are consulting closely with poland and other allies is stony as ready to defend every inch of nato territory. we are in full solidarity with our close allies, poland nato's. article 5 states that an attack against a member states is considered to be against all members, resulting in a collective military response, which is one of the alliance is called principles. an attack can only be defined by members and ask 5 has only been in votes once after september, the 11th made. so scheduled an urgent summit for later on wednesday, former pentagon security analyst, michael maloof, says that quote, hysteria can be dangerous these off the record. so called government spokesman could get us engaged in a war and race hysteria. it already has got the,

the corporate media all fired up, claiming that it's all the components were rushed. russian. we don't know that we have no idea what, what they are and what they're to. it could be some piece of equipment from something that the ukranian got from the west. who knows, we gotta be very careful because the next step in this is something that could involve world war and that's what we are trying to avoid at all costs. ready this thing could easily mushroom, this is a where we're at a very recent important crossroads. and we've got to tread very, very carefully on this. and this should go before the un, the un should appoint examiners of the equipment, ensure that are that the debris rather to ensure some object to but he's so that both sides can accept certain conclusions. and that's what right now you don't have

either side of trusting the other and their so called experts. so we really don't know. the only thing we do know is that some debris that fell into a farm field was not an intent to aim at military targets. whereas the military target, so this, this is hysteria on steroids of it need those top military power. the u. s. has sought to tone down calls to invoke article 5. president biden has said, it's quote, unlikely that russia find the missile dependence against stressing that they cannot confirm its origin. jeremy information with i don't want to say that we completely immersive i from my mind that was fired or will say, well it feels like the hysteria that we have witness in the 1st hour is after the

deadline may fall incident in rural fall under the border with ukraine is now over not only the u. s. leader, but we are more and more voices calling for an investigation expertise before any allegations, an accusation statements. and i'll be more careful and more balanced. speaking at the press conference here in bali, just a while ago, the president of turkey, a, another nater said, said that quotation to raise a general impression among the leaders here and of quotation that russia has nothing to do with the attack. adding that the countries are now considering the version of a technical mistake that could have been behind the incident. i had a chance to ask me about why then some members of the north atlantic hawaiians before any expertise before any probe that everybody now agrees is needed, were very quick to point fingers at russia while it was certainly lead to further

escalation on the ground in the region, but globally, as, wow, i, mr. ever been sad that insisting that russia is involved in what happened in poland would be ab provocation. all mother, there's a general impression that this miss hall is not russia made. i do not think we should insist that this massage was launched by raw shot. this would be a pro occasion that the gun also said that turkey is now working hard. oh, continue in working hard to try to bring moscow and key of together for negotiations. stressing that he believes that this conflict could and should be resolved for whole average and free dialogue. and certainly groundless accusations, do not help these efforts. and we also added that he's planning to talk to reference. president wymer, put in after he's back from the d. 20 it was a big question, at least here is day 20, whether it's members, torn apart by unprecedented divisions with the over how to approach russia,

ukraine conflict will at all be able to come to consensus over the final declaration. and now we hear that the document has been adopted. we heard earlier from russia's foreign minister, said to gay la grove, that some western countries wanted the document to be politicized. and include condemnation of russia's special military operation, the ukraine, but certainly russia and also china, india, brazil, saudi arabian, indonesia, at least refused to accept such wording. and now that the final edition of the final declaration says that most of did d 20 countries condemn military actions in ukraine, but quotation, there are other opinions about this situation. d 20 final declaration. also note that the use of threat of use of nuclear weapons is an acceptable that the ukrainian conflict to worse and existing problems of the global economy. and also stress the importance of the grain deal so called black c grain initiative brokered

earlier by turkey at and the un allowing the expert of rain from earlier unblocked ukrainian fords to poorest countries. and all g 20 members are in favor of ex extension. if not prolonged, it is supposed to be expired in just a couple of days. ah, us called $27.00 continues to appears to be morbid news for africa with the world economic forum is saying that the continent needs to pay $2.00 trillion dollars to meet his parish agreement. obligation to minimize emissions or of the african continent use is less than 4 percent of global emissions, which fails in comparison to the 19 percent produced by the u. s. and 13 by the u. the demands have spot process among eco activists with cop $27.00 guests, saying that all the solutions must be found for the continent. can we be paid for the damages so far caused by extraction?

before we've been sleep down to see that we need to highlight strapped with benefiting in this for me to not africa. so if africa is to develop, let africa sit down, look for solutions that african and decide decided solutions. we are going to take africa ms to go there. we africa has an opportunity to be a leader and build their own economies without following as they store capaluto pathways. because if we sell competing with, if total polluters, their systems are very well developed, we might not bid them, but we can bid them by going green, we can bid them by being renewable permit us. latino corolla toddler explains how the west impacts on south africa's economy is putting the countries energy independence at risk. an $8500000000.00 pledge made at last year's cop 26th climate change conference in glasgow is finally coming to life rich nations of the west. who, through their own industrial development, created the climate crisis. and now giving our global to south africa to get it off

of coal. it's called the just energy transition plan is a deal between south africa and 5 other governments. the united states, the united kingdom, the european union, germany and france. but what's in it for south africa? we are using the transition to put yourself in debt, in circumstances where we're not even using the transition to creating the best out of renewables. we just want to get one on a weston money the, the, the, the, the equipment is gonna come from china. and we're just going to be of assistance of the debt and the image. so i'm sick, i'm, you know, i'm still skeptical about the strategy income. so the benefit, the long term benefit percent of 97 percent of the $8500000000.00 will be loaned while 3 percent will be grant protest in germany have already kicked off the

process by depositing 3 $100000000.00 euros each to the south african treasury this will be a 20 year loan, 5 years included of grace period, and they will be at an interest of 3.6 percent for france and 3 percent for germany . but south africa says more grants and less loans would work better. while south africa welcomes low interest or concession loans, a substantial portion of this funding needs to be in the form of grants. the move towards lower carbon emissions is imperative as the toll will begin to weigh heavily on south africa's economy. the list of interest rates rising, mr vet is the other one. the, the issue of south africa had been taken. the loans in foreign countries is only going to exacerbate the problem because the currency, the south african brent will continue to weaken is all in all major currencies. but europe is essentially a fossil fuel addict and cannot currently survive without them when russia reduced

this natural gas supply to europe. leaders of italy, france, and especially germany, came rushing to africa thinking the same fossil fuels they used to buy from russia . europe wants to turn africa into its gas station. we don't have to follow the footsteps of the rich world that actually caused climate change in the 1st place. and they are also so seen those floats m. i mean, cold from south africa and m, guess from the rest of the good, the continent. that's the focus, the. but i think we need to be looking at and see what does it mean, depths of this loan. so this touch western nations, apparently taking a huge gamble on the south africa, being a successful model for how developing countries can transition from high to low cupboard. while south africa is itself taking a huge gamble on the west, then green agenda. and some commentators say it is being done at the peril of

risking energy independence and sovereigns. gabriella sat on 4 out of tea and jonathan and moving on. now, germany plans to nationalize a former local subsidiary of russian energy joint gas problem. that's as is, government seeks ways to maintain energy security amid the looming winter. let's get more in this now from artie contributor ritual master. earlier this week, the german government announced plans to nationalize a former subsidiary and germany of russia's state own gas problem, which it seized earlier this year. the company called gas prom germania has been renamed to securing energy for europe, or se f e. so where did berlin get the bio cash from? from brussels to the tune of over 225000000 euros worth of aid. and now poland plans to do the same with gas problems, euro, coal, gas assets,

inside the country. they're just the latest of a wave of nationalization that have hit european energy companies. already this year, france nationalized gas and electricity. supplier electricity did a false or death, which also sells gas by the way. and berlin did the same with uniform. the countries taught gas importer in order to prevent the country's energy system from collapsing. it says we're being told that the nationalization are necessary to save these companies because russia left them high and dry. but it was just back in september that you commission president ursula vander line, and now the decision to confiscate a 3rd of european oil gas and coal companies. quote, excessive profits as a so called a solidarity contribution to help europe in household struggling with energy prices . we're not exactly sure how that's paying or translating into any kind of relief

for them that hasn't been detailed. it's also hard to imagine that investor confidence in european energy companies wouldn't have been spooked by that kind of a move even more than the u. sanction of it, of its own energy supply from russia as a part of a deliberate ideological and virtue signaling strategy. are you really serious? we need mine own russian oil and gas before you will have yours up as far to the old net ban. so in my opinion, it's time debt after the americans and the british. also we decide on of for temporary ban on russian oil and gas, as long as this a gretchen and case continuing. nonetheless, russia repeated virtually non stop that it was willing to continue energy supplies to europe. even after gas prompts north stream gas pipeline system into europe was mysteriously blown up. russia was ready to snore. mitchell's apply though, the boys in the european union got close enough. i want to say that i can just open

the title stuff going back this week. if such decisions are made by a european colleagues with regard to gas supplies for their consumers, all necessary procedures will be carried out to insure the supplies. so now the narrative being peddled by germany is that it has to nationalize energy companies including gas prompt assets. because russia come off europe's energy supply. in reality, it's the e u that cut itself off and then was so oblivious to the damage that it had done that it figured that it could treat them like cash cows on top of that to fund the damage that their own sanctions had done to european households ability to pay for the inflation and energy price hikes caused by their own policies. and now just like someone who breaks an expensive vase in the store, brussels is having to pay aid to germany, to buy the gas from subsidiary that it broke. yet another resounding success for european economic policy. um on this,

let's cross live now to shine shoe cla and economist jonah's from delhi. thank you for joining us. now what do you make of this move by germinate to nationalize the former gas from subsidiary while you thought thank you for inviting me. i thought i didn't actually, the issue is i believe it is. it is, will move on part of the buses as well as why i say so is because in the, in the bar straight has gone down the route of nationalization and the only from economic but it doesn't work out well. neither are the most needed for investor confidence in the utopian economy, which is already they think many people will head when the euclidean was being just one of them. secondly, i believe one of those was,

was talking they that this is, this is just one of the story said back through the f b. they want to secure that and actually highlight the other side is that there needs to be a certain dialogue that needs to be initiated between that action site as well as a european site to figure out what best can be done to ensure that ordinary household in europe do not face a harsh winter on the one hand and sorting gas bases on the other. yeah, certainly a problem that many you, you households a face and now jimmy's government has argued that this move is necessary to protect its energy security given the war and ukraine. do you think that so so this is a bit of a misnomer in my mind and i let me read it. this is a bit often been found in c,

which is being shown on the back of the german administration. wherein if a dialogue takes place, i'm sure they got strong is willing to supply gaps to determine why they're there are certain concerns and they may be valid around the modalities in how do they do not as simple as somebody said that going on. but it just nationalizing something which does not belong to you in the 1st place and then using you need to kind of fund it kind of and then you know, a natural, nationalistic story is not something that is going to go down. because sooner or later, you know, what are we and the damage that is being done?

why many household as well as the back of you, particularly berlin, is something that will have a long on the back of something that the nationalization i'm have very bad it. but where you've just taken my next question out of my mouth. do you think this will affect your reputation as a business partner? yes, definitely. because as i said, right, gone down by bob before doing off mrs. we had a we have off nationalization. i know that impacted on me. so in the calling you back, any kind of new which is against the market economist 11 will mentally shake, invest one for the right. that is, that is something that is a given i'm, it's, me go now on this spot. then every economy,

there are no. if i say got anybody can pick what they want, they want the want any other country can just go ahead and nationalize the effort on investments off of various multi national. they come across different countries and in back in the entire international economics pick up from crashing down the this is the blow to the basic and it's off the, the match. acknowledge that have been that since when you are 2. i know now that has been challenged in the long term. i really agree that this is about why showing so clear economists, donors live from delhi. thank you very much for sharing your thoughts to those today on that nationalization. and you know, the news candidates, security intelligence service has ruled, the freedom convoy protest movement did not pose a threat to national security. and that's

a revelation that flies in the face of the government's early decisions invoke the emergent designs to end this blockades. at no point did the service or says that the protests in ottawa or elsewhere constituted a threat to the security of canada. canadian security intelligence service did not assess that any foreign state supported the protest through funding that foreign states deploy disinformation techniques or that any foreign state actors attempted to enter into canada to support the protest. a separate convoys of truck driver's blockaded streets in also where to protest against kobe 19 mandates and the legit to government mismanagement as well as holding for just introduce resignation. the prime minister then a vote, the emergencies in a bit to end the protest. and that was a move that extended the government's powers, but was questioned by some legal activists. canadian lawyer on legal come and say, said david fray hates says that the police responds to the movements was over zealous from basically per day

to the very last day when the police came in heavy handed holy, militarized police force. so by don't be surprised, protest everybody knew it was an overreach at the time. the justification at the time was that there was a blockade of being back to the bridge critical infrastructure for anybody who's been watching this public emergency commission. we all knew it from the time the emergency that was invoke the ambassador bridge blockade had been resolved, be a court order. by the time the market was invoked, there was no national threat, threat to infrastructure, threat to overthrow the state. what we're seeing through the inquiry is that even by true, those own recognition, the provinces had all the resources they need to put an end to it. but it went on for a little too long embarrass, just intrude on the special scale and his underlining 10th behind all. this was what prize holes and punishing the project. what they did, which is why

a lot of people think he invoke the act on the one hand to punish them. but on the other hand, to try to trigger a violent response from them to sort of retroactively justify in boca yeah, that's all for now to be sure to check out our t dot com for all of the latest breaking news and updates. and we'll see you right back here at the top of the hour. thank you for watching with for some reason a number of so called european intellectuals and politicians maintain the e. u represents the highest level of human development. we're told europe is a garden and the rest of us live in the jungle. rhetoric aside, europe is in serious trouble, hardly a model for the rest of the world. in fact, europe is declining into irrelevance. ah,

with the for the business. and you agree in the daily

shoes you made? it comes green. when you lose, you got it is just such not critical. can you provide you with such a short lapse? you opt out of the defense, you're unemployed. shelter. you get thrown with them probably. and you're still here, i think if yesterday she was fluid, this is jim that i'm going to make sure it's not as cold yellow you listen lation your particular message and asking gillian, you speak to it and if it goes ellis to new premium, i love that which lady because she was going to initiate the new speed to include reflects with the vision when you somebody else focus focus on yeah.