just a moment please. systems to see the steve both there's no rules. you motivation says do you do both? ah russians. defense ministries, they miss all that fell in poland, killing 2 people with fired from a ukrainian as 300 and defense system that says more so what makes you turn on the crime? says it switches to admitting that the myths are probably came from ukraine, which has been backed up by washington, is pointing the finger at russia and judging nato to weigh in with some african vicarious western countries of trying to extort trillions of dollars. 3 loans to the continent to pay for global admission,

but africa is least responsible for a lead. i'm due to their own economy without following. they took up a new test by police and germany moved to nationalize a form, a subsidiary of russia's gowns prom, and apparently sacrifices liberal economic values to tackle the snowballing energy crisis. with school here in the russian capital. and this is the international with the very latest world news update, a very warm welcome to you today. now russia defense ministry says it has identified wreckage found in east and poland. does elements of a guided missile from an as 300 ad different system used by neighboring ukraine. also analyzing photos from the scene. moscow stress that all allegations of russian missile sporting and poland, a deliberate attempts to escalate the situation. the overnight incident came off,

the russian forces launch the bow out of high position miss sauls at military and energy infrastructure sites in ukraine. moscow stress that it's trying to carried out against targets inside ukrainian territory as no closer than 35 kilometers from the polish border while meanwhile, so if i didn't have report to the informed americans g 7 and nathan partners that the incident was likely caused by ukrainian ad defense miss all the polish president has made a youth now saying he has no evidence that the fall and mister with 5 by the russian military. while acknowledging the high probability that ukraine's ad defend system was responsible, most likely, it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was a missile fired by the russian side. much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland. poland could have immediately

told the truth about the missile incident. then everyone would have immediately understood that russia had nothing to do with it. when it's discuss it further now with the corresponding to the studio, donald quarter, thanks for coming in dawn. and what do you make opponents? apparently, you turn here when the key, 1st of all this appears to indicate that war saw probably cares a bit more about pointing the finger at russia and risking the possibility of an all out global conflict over this. then it actually is in terms of getting to the truth of what killed 2 of its actual citizens on polish territory. because let's not forget, poland actually began pointing the finger at russia for all of this saying that a russian made missile was involved without giving, giving any sort of more explanation as to what it meant by that. and then right after it said, it would hold as an emergency meeting to discuss the details and decide where it was going to go from there. but 2nd of all, let's think about the timing of all this because we're salt statements that this

was likely not some sort of russian military russian missile attack. this came just moments after we heard reports that bite and had made a similar statement, and it was only after that that war saw began towing that line as well. so it makes you wonder how much actual investigation is going into finding. discovering the facts surrounding the situation here. so now we're in a situation where both bite and reportedly and what war saw definitely are both towing the line of basically what the russian defense ministry said. rushes defense ministry said that this was this. the missiles that were shown in the photos that came out of this polish territory were actually missiles that were surface to air missiles that must have come from a soviet made missile defense system. specifically the s 300 that the ukrainians are using. so it must have come from that actual missile system, which by the way, is even incapable of striking ground targets at all. and more recently,

we heard also from the head of nato, the he, he trying to. and he basically said the same thing that the missile that made the impact in that area was a likely to be a ukrainian one. but at the same time, he still says that rushes to blame for all of this have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and we have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against nato. the incident was likely caused by a ukrainian air defense, nissan. fired to defend ukrainian territory against the russian cruz me saw attacks. well, as we know, if it hadn't been determined that this was a russian miss, all these could have spelled a very serious escalation of the conflicts you get. meanwhile, ukraine is still a calling for nathan to intervene, basically right from the beginning just minutes moments after this,

this was declared by the polish authorities without waiting for any sort of information to emerge. ukraine immediately started blaming russia. we heard from ukraine's foreign minister on twitter, who said that this now widely accepted story of things that it was a ukrainian surface to air missile. was a conspiracy theory that russia was trying to spread ukraine foreign minister said that and also zelinski immediately called for action to be taken against russia. as a result of that. and we heard from officials from the baltic, nato states, basically echoing that sentiment as well. it was as if they were all ready to martyr themselves in a future 3rd world war. let's take a listen to what they said. skis. how many times as you claim said that the actions of the terrorist state will not be limited to our country alone. pissing nato territory with missiles. this is a russian missile attack on collective security. this is a really significant escalation. action is needed. brush and miss south,

hidden the territory of the ne to members a very dangerous escalation by the kremlin. lots bay express is full, solid charity, with our ally, poland, and will support any action deems appropriate by poland. russia will bear full responsibility for all the consequences. latest news from poland is most concerning . we are consulting closely with poland and other allies. estonia is ready to defend every inch of nato territory. we are in full solidarity with our close allied poland. and it's also important to understand that right after it became known that this missile impact took place. there was already talk among western politicians and what people in the western media about nato, potentially invoking article 4 or article 5 of its charter. and to give our viewers a bit of understanding of what that is. article 5 says that an armed attack against one member states should be considered an attack against all. so that basically

immediately started getting people wondering if this was going to lead to some sort of war with russia. but it also made others start to wonder if ukraine is really to blame for this. would nato take the kind of action against key of then it would against moscow with russia were to blame. obviously with this new statement from stolen burg, it's pretty clear that they're going to be a lot lighter on than if it was milestones focusing. how is this being covered in the west of mainstream media? well, across the western media, of course, we started immediately seeing headlines blaming russia. i mean, saying that this was a russian missile attack, and there was no shortage of sensationalism either. we saw some headline saying that this was a shocking act on behalf of russia. some saying that that it was an attack on polish territory. one even said that that russia bombed poland territory. i mean, one of us, so the and there and in the televisions. also, there was no shortage of sensationalism either nature. he shouldn't be restrained,

at least in its language, in its message to russia. would the us need to adjust its force posture there, and there is actually a lot that nato could do. and this is, in fact exactly the kind of scenario that journalists like myself, have been posing to nato. what exactly does it mean that you will defend every inch of the alliance territory? so that's going to be put to the test. now, what would that mean? now, for this conflict, and whether it now spills toward, elicits a reaction from nato, of these kinds of reports or no doubt shocking, but to be honest, they're not very surprising because throughout russia's military operation, we've seen time and time again, the mainstream media, just pirating basically what keith has been saying without any sort of critical examination. so this is just a repetition of that the same kind of thirst for a 3rd world war that would be absolutely devastating. that key of 1st expressed now

being shown in the western media dawn that many thanks to coming in with those details that somehow correspond that donald caught them off. the ellia spoke to dr stephen guy. it's a professor at the institute of european studies in bel. great, who says an escalation in the ukraine conflict is in no one's interests apart from kids. i honestly did not expect a escalation of, but i did expect a lot of hysteria. unfortunately, in many eastern european societies, there is this war mongering a lazy culture in the last a couple of months, which are really that is growing out of proportion. i think they're very responsible, especially for countries bordering, ah, bordering russia, that are members of nato because it's the last thing for tara national interest would be actually, i get involved in a conflict then,

and for the conflict to escalate. i mean, i expect it to be down played look at what happened with the investigation about the nor stream. we have an elephant in the room. ah, and we have germany and france which became literally a punching bag for london or washington even keel. and they are not even almost, they're not even allowed to talk about the, you know, who was the perpetrator. what i see is not only censorship, let's say when it, when it comes to do the lives of people who work for cancelled. but also it seems that certain countries are being muted and especially i say, the core of european union that the biggest victim of the war is the you, which is being stripped from from powers and by the, by the anglo american coalition. the u. s. department of homeland security

secretary has said americans shouldn't worry about a nuclear escalation, and ukraine as any destination in europe wouldn't reach the us. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . me while for me you as president, donald trump announcing he would once a president in 2024 accused the global community of overlooking the nuclear threat to renew deals. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately, or never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years now, grant bass. professor steven gaia to again say that in an atmosphere of global

paranoia, of the situation in ukrainians, creating a real nuclear threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent and people got used to it. i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistic for literally but because of because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoid is so high that certain events can be misreads by the other side. and then what things can go out, of course, just because of a series of mistakes. and i think that we are in a really a grave, a situation of a possible global nuclear conflict. and at the same time,

these polls, modern issues are blown out of proportion. of course, the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes off or we're done with the imminent threat. and that is one of a, of a global nuclear conflict. the latest escalation of ukraine comes in the 2nd day of the g, 20 summit in barley where some countries have reported the agree to set aside the differences to agree on a joint statement of correspondence. maria phenomena is beth weiss, it was a big question at this year's day 20, whether its members are torn apart by unprecedented divisions with the over how to approach russia. ukraine conflict will at all be able to come to consensus over the final declaration. and now we hear that the document has been adopted. we heard earlier from russia's foreign minister instead of a live world that some western countries wanted the document to be politicized. and

include condemnation of russia's special military operation, the ukraine, but certainly russia and also china, india, brazil, saudi arabian, indonesia, at least refused to accept such wording. and now that the final edition of the final declaration also notes that the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is an acceptable that the ukrainian conflict. divorce and existing problem is the global economy and also stress the importance of the grain deal. so cold black sea grain initiative walker earlier by turkey as and the un allowing the expert of rain from earlier and walk ukrainian fords to poorest countries. and all g 20 members are in favor of ex extension, if not prolonged. it is supposed to be expired in just a couple of days on the side lines of the summit. we also spoke to the russian minister of finance about the grain and energy crises,

both of which have come up the discussion of bali. he also spoke of quote, rushes, the isolation saying that despite efforts, while others moscow participated in old talks, that just isn't it no symptoms? yes, indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relates to the russian federation portion, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization. you're asking about continuing the grain deal. it's true that many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal because we all see the situation with hunger and the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain food to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal, and the source of communication with colleagues says a love, rob, speaking of the summit of leaders, said that russia is for the continuation of the deal, only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries and countries with the european economy as is happening now. therefore,

we spoke in favor of continuing the tail under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions had them since they lead to price increases and such increases in the, the grow for the economy. and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources, removing old barriers that prevent us from exporting our any results of the other countries. and to day, there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy, and the d 20 itself was always considered. the issue was a world economy and its dynamics. all of this was stressed by the russian delegation and i think the western countries heard this religion here. microscope. cosigner should delegates in kirkwood is on behalf of our anti delegation. i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes. in the speeches of individual western

countries joining the event of the g 20. there was a certain town in terms of restrictions and calls to rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without rush on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy and not a single issue can be resolved without us use or if you could assist me while a high level meeting between chinese and british leaders on the fringes of the g. 20 has been scattered by the overnight problems in poland, where she soon was expected to face president. she'd been paying for the 1st meeting in 5 years with many issues on the table. but just moments before, he was whisked off to an urgent meeting with g 7 and nato partners. let's discuss these developments with kinder shoot. i put on the list senior fellow at the pango institution things. how many, thanks for joining us on the program. and so what's your reaction to the consolation of the meeting between the petition, chinese ladies, what sort of message do you think london is sending? if any well,

i think they failed it too much over the lives of the 1st beach in the 2 countries in about 5 years. we've been it's a difficult time and i think it's 30 steps at the u. k. i'm trying to resume a face to face discussion between the leaders, you know, they have a lot of challenges, a lot of issues and needed to listen to the consent of the right front. the way to resolve a problem, the disputes. but also i think it shows that the u. k for the ukraine issue. all your affairs, prioritize them with defined. i would say that's also very exponent because you okay, if you look at the, become global in the after breakfast, they don't have a strong ties with china economically. it least fit on the market. to tweak this on me, i'm not sure that they can ever achieve their goal of global break. so what do you

think you can really wants to achieve in its relations with china and more senate for beijing? well, i think for your particular right now, i will be having a very big problem economy, session and inflation has been in the highest a more than 40 years. and there is a cost of living quite an awkward breakfast to the struggling to stabilize the economy. you know, the imagine that the us, the. ringback sign of free trade creek with okay, that becomes hopeless at no sign at all when the us would agree to grant them such a free trade deal. and now the phone number you asked would challenge china? oh, shoot example on calm down and of the even talk about that the on to one that's very wide to see the least. so the need to,

to really open more less a relationship with, with the child in particular times in order to compensate to the laws from breakfast loss from a relationship. but with, with you, you're not doing that well. so we're struggling to come the issues for you to a chinese investment is important for them because it's a presentation you okay. you know, take pride in the a tweak that want to increase the china and before breakfast, you know, we've got the k as a bridge basically to the best european unit congress. but off the graphic value of the okay to the shami is operation to the european continent. it has to be that not all that is

a reality. so if you compare to gp people trying to get more than 5 backed up the page. so you can see in the sense that if you are playing with the, the other, the most of the u. k. the, the back like a week position of the need to re sold or resume healthy relationship with china. what she didn't was placed on the list and senior fellow at the panel institution things, how many thanks for your time. really appreciate your inside. and last i think my plan now made the ongoing cop 27 climate change conference. there is more bad news for africa with the world economic forum saying that the continent needs to pay $2.00 trillion dollars to meet its obligations to cut down on a mission with us. despite the dia, economic state of many african countries, which are deep in debt to western economies, however, the african continent produces less than 4 percent of the global emissions,

which pales in comparison to the 19 percent produced by the us and 13 percent by the u. the demands of sparked protests among the co activists with some cop 20000 guest saying other solutions must be found for the continent. can we be paid for the damages caused by its structure? before we've been sleep down to the left, we need to find drug benefits for me. so if africa is to develop africa loop for solutions, africa, and decided this other solutions we are going to. africa needs to go away. africa has an opportunity to be a leader and due to their own economies without following, they still copper loot that spot rate because if we start competing with total pollutants, their systems are very well developed. we might not beat them, but we can beat them by going green, we can bid them by being renewable for us. he's corolla, toddler,

explains how the west impacts on south africa. the economy is putting the countries energy independence at rest. an 8500000000 dollar pledge made at last year's cop 26 climate change conference in glasgow is finally coming to life rich nations of the west, who through their own industrial development, created the climate crisis. and now giving our loans to south africa to get it off of coal. it's called the just energy transition plan is a deal between south africa and 5 other governments. the united states, the united kingdom, the european union, germany and france. but what's in it for south africa? we are using the transition to produce so in debt, in circumstances where we're not even using the transition to creating the best out of renewables. we just want to depend one on a weston money, the, the, the, the,

the equipment is gonna come from china. and we're just going to be of assistance of the debt and the image. so i'm sick, i'm, you know, i'm still skeptical about the strategy income. so the benefit, the long term benefit percent of 97 percent of the $8500000000.00 will be loaned while 3 percent will be grants. protest in germany have already kicked off the process by depositing $300000000.00 euros each to the south african treasury. this will be a 20 year loan, 5 years included of grace period. and they will be at an interest of 3.6 percent for france. and 3 percent for germany, but south africa says more grants and less loans would work better. while south africa welcomes low interest or concession loans, a substantial portion of this funding needs to be in the form of grants. the move towards lower carbon emissions is imperative as the toll will begin to weigh heavily on south africa's economy. the list of interest rates rising,

mr vet is the other one. the, the issue of south africa had been taken. the loans in foreign c is only going to exacerbate the problem because the currency, the south african rent, will continue to be can i get all of major occurrences? but europe is essentially a fossil fuel addict and cannot current. he survived without them. when russia reduced his natural gas supply to europe, leaders of italy, france, and especially germany, came rushing to africa seeking the same fossil fuels they used to buy from russia. europe wants to turn africa into its gas station. we don't have to follow the footsteps of the rich world that actually caused climate change in the 1st place. and they are also so seen those schools m, i mean cold from south africa and m guess from the rest of the good, the continent. that's the focus that i think we need to be looking at and see what

does it mean depths of this loan. so this touch western nations, apparently taking a huge gamble on the south africa, being a successful model for how developing countries can transition from high to low cupboard. while south africa is itself taking a huge gamble on the west, then green agenda. and some commentators say it is being done at the peril of risking energy independence and sovereigns, gabriela santa, for r, t. and jonathan. germany plans to nationalize a former local subs the dairy of russian energy, giant gas prom, which was renamed, securing energy for europe, back in april as it takes ways to maintain energy security. i'm at the looming winter in order to secure the gas supply in germany. the federal government is transferring ailing gas company, securing energy for europe into federal ownership. the reason for this is securing

energy for europe's over and deafness in the commercial balance sheet and the resulting threat of insolvency which would jeopardize the security of supplying germany. the german government announced plans to nationalize a former subsidiary and germany of russia's state own gas problem, which it seized earlier this year. the company called gas prom germania has been renamed to securing energy for europe or se f e. so where did berlin get the bio cash from? from brussels to the tune of over 225000000 euros worth of aid. and now polen plans to do the same with gas problems, euro, coal, gas assets, inside the country. they're just the latest of a wave of nationalization that have hit european energy companies. already this year, france nationalized gas and electricity. supplier electricity did a false or death,

which also sells gas by the way. and berlin did the same with uniform. the countries taught gas importer in order to prevent the country's energy system from collapsing. it says we're being told that the nationalization are necessary to save these companies because russia left them high and dry. but it was just back in september that you commission president ursula vander line, and now the decision to confiscate a 3rd of european oil gas and coal companies. quote, excessive profits as a so called a solidarity contribution to help europe in household struggling with energy prices . we're not exactly sure how that's pay or translating into any kind of really for them that hasn't been detailed. it's hard to imagine that investor confidence in european energy companies wouldn't have been spoofed by that kind of move, even more than the u. sanction of it, of its own energy supply from russia as

a part of a deliberate ideological and virtue signalling strategy. are you really serious? we need man on russian oil and gas before you will have yourself. it started on netflix bond, so in my opinion, it's time debt after the americans and the british also we decide on of for temporary ban on russian oil and gas, as long as this aggression and case continuing. nonetheless, russia repeated virtually non stop that it was willing to continue energy supplies to europe. even after gas prompts nord stream gas pipeline system into europe was mysteriously blown up. russia is ready, astonish, rules apply for the board is in the european union's colon if they want it, they can just open the top and that's it. if such decisions are made by a european colleagues with regard to gas supplies for their consumers, all necessary procedures will be carried out to ensure the supplies. so now the narrative being peddled by germany is that it.