a super sick or is crackled for sugars for mm hm. ah. with the headlines on asi international, colin's make you turn on the incidence that killed 2 people near the border with ukraine as warsaw admit that the miss all probably came from kids as defensive. which washington also agrees with nato's chief says, there is no indication to miss all strike with deliberate wallet light came from you crate. a key points with finger work, russia, and calls on the west lead block to weigh in with some africans accused western

countries of trying to capitalize on massive loans instead of grants to the construct continent which has to pay for global emissions. but africa is least responsible. africa has, i don't want it to be a leave. i'm due to their own economies without following the store to cope with 5 pm here in the russian compet dylan. this is asi international with the very latest world news, not. they are very welcome to, you know, start with our breaking news story. the polish president has made a u turn now saying he has no evidence that a missile that fell within polish borders was find by the russian military law. while acknowledging the high probability that ukraine's defense system was responsible. nato secretary general also doubles down on the point. however, he now adds that russia should be held responsible. most likely, it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was

a missile fired by the russian side. much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland to have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and you have no indication that russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the insolent will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense. miss arn fired to the fens, ukrainian territory against the russian cruise missile attacks. but let me be clear, this is not ukraine's full. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility. ah, it continues. it's illegal war against ukraine, or fall under the latest development. far as the 18th donald quoted the 2, and he joins me in the studio now. don,

thanks to coming in. what do you make of the you turn in by warsaw a festival? well, nickie, this appears to indicate that warsaw may be more interested in just pointing the finger at russia and risking in all our global war than it actually is interested in getting down to the facts as to whose weapons actually killed 2 polish citizens in this impact near the border, because let's not forget, poland began to imply that this was russia's fault after it began saying that these missiles that landed there were, or, or rather missile or missiles were actually russian made. and after giving in to all this hysteria, giving rise to it in the western media among western politicians, it only then said it was going to have an emergency meeting to discuss what is actually known about the situation and then decide what to do from there. so naturally this evoked a not so nice reaction from moscow. we heard from the kremlin spokesman, who said, basically what, why didn't war saw just tell the truth to begin with. poland could have immediately

told the truth about the missile incident. then everyone would have immediately understood that russia had nothing to do with it. but 2nd of all, we have to think about the timing of all this because we're saw as reaction actually came just just moments after we got reports that joe biden was saying that this was likely a ukrainian missile that hit in the in polish territory and kill those 2 people, so now we have a situation where basically washington and warsaw are actually towing the line of the russian government. because we also heard from russia's defense ministry. they said that the rockets that were shown are the remnants of the missiles that were shown in the pictures that came out from that territory were actually indicative of surface to air missiles that came from a soviet made in missile the air defense system that was only used by the ukrainian military, so that's definitely something interesting to, to take into account here. we're talking about s 300 missiles, which by the way, our s 300 missile systems rather which by the way,

cannot even hit ground targets when news broke. that missile had landed within the territory of a nato ally. it led to concerns that this could be the straw that broke the camel's back. this could lead to a very serious escalation in the conflict. however, no evidence points that it towards that being a russian missile. and yet we still have ukraine here, calling for an escalation from nathan that's. that's right. instead of waiting for any of the information to come out, basically, after this became known, we heard from ukraine and officials immediately pointing the finger at russia. we heard from ukraine's foreign minister, who on twitter said that the now widely accepted story of events, which is which is that ukrainian missile fell on post territory. was a conspiracy theory that russia was spreading around. that's what ukraine's foreign minister said. and we also heard from lot of mirrors the lensky who said that there should be consequences, there should be action taken against russia for this. i mean, it was as if that there were the ukrainian president was ready to sacrifice his

entire country in the 3rd world war over this scheme as you, how many times as you claim said that the actions of the terrorist state will not be limited to our country alone, pissing nato territory with missiles. this is a russian missile attack on collective security. this is a really significant escalation action is needed. russia now promotes a conspiracy theory that it was allegedly a missile of ukrainian air defense that fell on the polish theory, which is not true. no one should buy russian propaganda or amplify its messages. this lesson should have been long learned since the downing of hash m age 17. now it's also important to note that right after all this took place, we started hearing talk among western politicians and the western media about nato, potentially invoking articles 4 or 5 of its charter. and just to give our viewers an idea of what that is, article 5 of the charter says, an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against all. so as the

story was unraveling and it became clearer and clearer that it was likely kia was to blame for this, many were wondering if nato would come down on kiev as hard as it would on moscow, but based on thornton, berg's recent comments, it's clearly not going to be the case. i don't know. what kind of coverage of this are we seeing in the mainstream media? well, again, immediately after this happened, we started seeing a headline saying that this was a russian attack on polish territory. and there was no shortage of sensationalism either. we saw headline saying that it was a shocking act on behalf of russia. some saying that this is going to be a lead up to a 3rd world war. one even said that russia had bombed poland and also in on western television screens, there was no shortage of this kind of hysteria. either nature, he shouldn't be restrained, at least in its language, in its message to russia, were the us need to adjust its force posture there. and there is actually

a lot that nato could do. and this is, in fact exactly the kind of scenario that journalists like myself, have been posing to nato. what exactly does it mean that you will defend every inch of the alliance territory? so that's going to be put to the test. now, what would that mean? now, for this conflict, and whether it now spills toward, elicits a reaction from nato. these kinds of reports, they're definitely shocking, but actually not very surprising because throughout russia special military military operation, we've kind of seen western media just blindly parroting what the saying about the conflict without doing any sort of critical examination of that information. so here again, we see this the same kind of thirst for a 3rd world war that came out of kids is basically republished in the western media done. thanks for coming over the details. the thought is on quarter nato allies. the in the bowl fakes have been singing the same tune as ukraine,

accusing russia of directly attacking the block and calling for immediate action. rush and miss south, hidden the territory of the ne to members a very dangerous escalation by the kremlin latch bay expresses full solidarity with our ally, poland, and will support any action deems appropriate by poland. russia will bear full responsibility for all the consequences. latest news from poland is most concerning . we are consulting closely with poland and other allies. estonia is ready to defend every inch of nato territory. we are in full solidarity with our close allies. poland, or celia spoke to dr. stephen guy is a professor at the institute of european studies in belgrade, who says an escalation in the ukraine conflict is in no one's interests apart from kids. i honestly do not expect an escalation of, but i did expect a lot of hysteria. unfortunately, i in many eastern european society,

these are there is this war mongering unless he culture in the last a couple of months, which really, that is growing out of proportion. i think they're very responsible, especially for countries bordering, ah, bordering russia, that are members of nato because it's the last thing for tara national interest would be to actually on get involved in a conflict then, and for the conflict to escalate. i mean, i expect it to be down played look at what happened with the investigation about the north stream. we have an elephant in the room. ah, and we have germany and france which became literally a punching bag for london or washington even key of ah, and they are not even almost, they're not even allowed to talk about the, you know, who was the perpetrator. what i see is not only censorship. let's say when it comes

to do the lives of people who work for cancelled. but also it seems that certain countries are being muted. and especially i said, the core of european union that the biggest victim of the war is the e u, which is being stripped from from powers. and by the, by the anglo american coalition, the u. s. department of homeland security secretary has said americans, it shouldn't worry about a nuclear escalation in ukraine as any destination in europe wouldn't reach the us . although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . me while for me you as president donald trump announcing he would run for president in 2024 accused the global community of overlooking the nuclear threat

to renew deal. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately, or never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years belgrade bass, professor steven guy. it again say that even an atmosphere of global paranoia over this situation, the ukrainian creating a real nuclear fact. it seems to me that we live now in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent and people got used to it. i really think this is more dangerous. not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistic literally. but because, because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoia is so high that certain events can be

misreads by the other side. and then, and things can go out of course, just because of a series of mistakes. and i think that we are in a really a grave, an association of a possible ha, global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean, all that. but this all comes after we're done with the imminent threat. i b, g, 20 summit, grain shipman, sand world hunger. we're 2 with the main topics on the agenda. russia, foreign minister agreed that russia is interested in an extension to the great deal allowing russian and ukrainian wheat fertilizers to be exported through the black sea. but only if it goes to those you urgently need it. on the sidelines on the summit, we said the russian minister finance about the grain and energy crises he spoke of

quote, to russia's isolation, saying that despite efforts from others, moscow participated in all this is not simply yes, indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relate to the russian federation, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization. you're asking about continuing the grain deal. it's true that many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal because we all see the situation with hunger and the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain. so to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal and the source of communication with colleagues. sir, j love rob, speaking of the summit of leaders said that russia is for the continuation of the deal only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries. and countries with a european economy as is happening now. therefore,

we spoke in favor of continuing the deal under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions had them since they lead to price increases and such increases into the growth of the economy. and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources. removing all barriers that prevent us from exporting our and he resorted to other countries. and to day, there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy, and the g 20 itself was always considered. the issue was a world economy and its dynamics. all of this was stressed by the russian delegation, and i think that the western countries heard this religion. who am i, was kroger cosigner to delegates, and gregory's on behalf of our entire delegation. i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes. in the speeches of an individual western countries joining the

events of the g 20. there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and call to rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy and not a single issue can be resolved without us. and they'd be ongoing cop $27.00 climate change conference. there is more bad news. the africa with the well they cannot make for and the saying that the continent is to pay to put a trillion dollars to meet its obligations to cut down on emissions. that if by the dia, economic state of many african countries, which a deep in debt to western economies. however, the african continent produces less than 4 percent of global emissions, which pales in comparison to the 19 percent produced by the us and 13 percent by the u. that demands have sparked protests among eco activists with some cop $27.00 guests saying other solutions must be found for the continent. can we be paid for

the damages so far caused by extraction? before we even sit down to see that we need to further extract with benefiting in this for me to not africa. so if africans to developed, let africa sit down, look for solutions that are african and decide this other solutions. we are going to hit africa ms. to go there, we africa has an opportunity to be a leader and build their own columns without following the store capaluto spots was because if we said competing with historical polluters, their systems are very well developed. we might not be to them, but we can bid the by going green weekly bid the by been to the yearbook where me, us artes carumba to let hartley explains that how the west's impact on south africa's economy is putting the country's energy independence at risk. an 8500000000 dollar pledge made at last year's cop 26 climate change conference in glasgow is finally coming to life rich nations of the west,

who through their own industrial development, created the climate crisis. and now giving out globally to south africa to get it off of coal. it's called the just energy transition plan is the deal between south africa and 5 other governments. the united states, the united kingdom, the european union, germany and france. but what's in it for south africa? we are using the transition to put yourself in debt in circumstances where we're not even using the transition to creating the best out of renewables. we just want to depend one on a weston money, the the, the did the quick when it's gonna come from china. and we're just going to be the subject of the debt and the image. so i'm sick, i'm, you know, i'm still skeptical about the strategy. can so the benefit, the long term benefit of 97 percent of the $8500000000.00 will be loaned,

while 3 percent will be grant fantasy and germany have already kicked off the process by depositing 3 $100000000.00 euros each to the south african treasury this will be a 20 year loan, 5 years included of grace period, and they will be at an interest of 3.6 percent for france and 3 percent for germany . but south africa says more grants and less loans would work better. while south africa welcomes low interest or concession loans, a substantial portion of this funding needs to be in the form of grants. the move towards lower carbon emissions is imperative as the toll will begin to weigh heavily on south africa's economy. the list of interest rates rising, mr. red is the other one. the issue of south africa had been taken. the loans in foreign is only going to exacerbate the problem because the currency, the south african rent will continue to be connected all in all major currency. but

europe is essentially a fossil fuel addict and can not current he survive without them when russia reduced its natural gas supply to europe. leaders of italy, france, and especially germany, came rushing to africa seeking the same fossil fuels they used to buy from russia. europe wants to turn africa into its gas station. we don't have to follow the footsteps of the rich world that actually caused climate change in the 1st place. and they are also so seen those schools m marine corps from south africa and m guess from the rest of the good, the continent. that's the focus. but i think we need to be looking at and see what does it mean depths of this loan. so this touch western nations, apparently taking a huge gamble on the south africa, being a successful model for how developing countries can transition from high to low cupboard. while south africa is itself taking a huge gamble on the west,

then green agenda. and some commentators say it is being done at the peril of risking energy independence and sovereigns got melissa to fill out a t and jonathan ponce. it will take temporary compulsory management of gas prom share in the mall gas pipeline system and polish territory. germany plans to nationalize a former local subsidiary of russian energy giant gas problem, which was we named securing energy for europe back in april. as it sneaks ways to maintain energy security and the looming winter in order to secure the gas supply in germany, the federal government is transferring ailing gas company, securing energy for europe into federal ownership. the reason for this is securing energy for europe's over indebtedness in the commercial balance sheet and the resulting threat of insolvency which would jeopardize the security of supplying germany. the german government announced plans to nationalize

a former subsidiary and germany of russia state own gas from which it seized earlier this year. the company called gas prom germania has been renamed to securing energy for europe or se f e. so where did berlin get the bio cash from? from brussels to the tune of over 225000000 euros worth of aid. and now poland plans to do the same with gas problems, euro, coal, gas assets, inside the country. they're just the latest of a wave of nationalization that have hit european energy companies. already this year, france nationalized gas and electricity. supplier electricity did a false or death, which also sells gas by the way. and berlin did the same with uniform. the countries taught gas importer in order to prevent the country's energy system from collapsing. it says we're being told that the nationalization are necessary to save

these companies because russia left them high and dry. but it was just back in september that do you commission president ursula vander line, and now the decision to confiscate a 3rd of european oil gas and coal companies. quote, excessive profits as the so called a solidarity contribution to help europe in household struggling with energy prices . we're not exactly sure how that's paying or translating into any kind of really for them that hasn't been detailed. it's hard to imagine that investor confidence in european energy companies wouldn't have been spoofed by that kind of move, even more than the u. sanction of it, of its own energy supply from russia as a part of a deliberate ideological and virtue signalling strategy. are you really serious? we need 9 own russian oil and gas before you will have yourself. it's 14 on netflix bond. so in my opinion, it's time debt. often the americans and the british. also,

we decide on of for temporary ban on russian oil and gas as long as this aggression and case continuing. nonetheless, russia repeated virtually non stop that it was willing to continue energy supplies to europe, even after gas probs nord stream gas pipeline system into europe was mysteriously blown up. russia is ready to start such supplies. the boat is in the european union's court. if they want it, they can just open the top and that's it. when you said, if such decisions are made by a european colleagues with regard to gas supplies for their consumers, all necessary procedures will be carried out. trends show the supplies. so now the narrative being peddled by germany is that it has to nationalize energy companies including gas prompts, assets. because russia cut off europe's energy supply. in reality, it's the e u that cut itself off and then was so oblivious to the damage that it had done

that figure that it could treat them like cash cows on top of that to fund the damage that their own sanctions had done to european households ability to pay for the inflation and energy price hikes caused by their own policies. and now just like someone who breaks an expensive vase in the store, brussels is having to pay aid to germany, to buy the gas from subsidiary that it broke. yet another resounding success for european economic policy and asked designed to help the u. s. target companies involved in theory as reconstruction is crippling good. they can all make recovery . that's according to a video publish on twitter by the former us special envoy to damascus. one of the architects of anti serious sanctions. the caesar act really lowers the bar for us. we don't have to prove, for example, that a company that's going in to do a reconstruction project in. ready damascus region is dealing directly with the

assad regime. we just have to have the evidence that proves that a company or an individual is investing in that sector. are you an expert with recently visited the war where we cons recalled on western and our country is to lift the sanctions claiming their prolonging suffering until the any prospects of the country rebuilding off the years of war. the statement followed a 12 day trip during which the special rapids collected evidence of the devastating effects sanctions, half heart across the country. atlanta do say 90 percent of seriously below the poverty line with limited access to food, water, and shell. so, importers are unable to access essential medical supplies on the international banks below payment system. an interview with r t, the us rep watershed. her experiences on explain why she feels the sanctions have to go a sanctioned, impose violations in violate international legal sanders. the human rights of

people in theory enormously, and the continued fact that even alone got the information from interlock, which i was able to collab theory really the month straight that the board over the huge. but fortunately, it became even higher talking from 2019 and caesar acts has been adopters. and today the impact over the economy and over all are all functioning. i would say critical or use is so enormous that i even feel that it shall be lifted immediately . starting at the 1st page will lead to all the sanctions imposed over critical infrastructure because we are not speaking now about the life of people these easier or more complicated to us that can about the survival of syria. people the global and by the use of, you know, later on tension, there are a number of legal treats which are used to. so q and b exist legal not to deny the

existence of such states for example, or include the enhancements of the country of the countries on so ter, and rejection on the ground state immunities as well as application of principles of international law that in the go the similar situation agrees with the announcement of the state of national emergence. it was done by the united pete told us every country as a ground to impose unilateral sanctions was absolutely doesn't correspond the criteria of national emergency. many thanks for joining us. heroin asi international. this wednesday we're back at the top of the the

the news ah watch and it was a sham, shorter one and i'm not trying to stay like a finance national z. m, known this is shyly yours, is when you buy, when you sit down with ah luis, counter russian state control narrative on the most landscape

with will ban in the european union, the kremlin machine, the state on russia today and archie spoke next. even our video agency roughly all bands on youtube with ah.