a most of them with your sewerage, no speaker for a girl who's a headline going out they international. poland makes you turn on the incident that killed 2 people near the border with ukraine as well to admit the myth. all apparently came from. yes. the defense is on with not launched by russia as a suggested well, not of k, a point to finger word most go in cause on nato to way in with all the blogs chief saying there's no indication that miss paul crash, which likely came from ukraine, was deliberate or that russia is seeking to talk with also this our,

the south african liter calls on the g 20 group to accept more countries from the continent into their ranks as africans push, pull a bigger role in geo politics. a 7 p, i'm hearing the russian capital, and this is oxy international. with the very latest world news updates, a very warm welcome to you. the polish president has made a u turn on the missile crisis off to initially blaming moscow. president duda now stacy has no evidence that the missile, which fell in easton, poland killing 2 locals was launched by the russian military. he's also admitted that ukraine's defense is likely responsible for the incident. most likely, it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was a missile fired by the russian side, much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland. nato's teeth has also double

down on the fact there's nothing to implicate russia in the incident, which was apparently caused by a ukrainian missile. the leader with the u. s. lead block or so says moscow is clearly not trying to target the lines bev, no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and you have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the insolent will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense. miss arn fired to the fens, ukrainian territory against russian cruise missile attacks. but let me be claire. this is not ukraine's fault. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility. ah, it continues. it's illegal war against ukraine. he has me,

mom refuses to accept that the method came from ukraine, demanding representatives are allowed to visit the site to investigate ortiz, donald corta, takes a closer look. this appears to indicate that warsaw may be more interested in just pointing the finger at russia and risking in all out global war than it actually is interested in getting down to the facts as to whose weapons actually killed 2 polish citizens in this impact near the border because let's not forget, poland began to imply that this was russia's fault after it began saying that these missiles that landed there were, or, or rather missile or missiles were actually russian made. and after giving in to all this hysteria, giving rise to it in the western media among western politicians, it only then said it was going to have an emergency meeting to discuss what is actually known about the situation and then decide what to do from there. so naturally this evoked a not so nice reaction from moscow. we heard from the kremlin spokesman, who said,

basically what, why didn't war saw just tell the truth to begin with. poland could have immediately told the truth about the missile incident. then everyone would have immediately understood that russia had nothing to do with it. but 2nd of all, we have to think about the timing of all this because warsaw reaction actually came just at just moments after we got reports that joe biden was saying that this was likely a ukrainian missile that hit in the in polish territory and kill those 2 people, so now we have a situation where basically washington and warsaw are actually towing the line of the russian government. because we also heard from russia's defense ministry. they said that the rockets that were shown, or the remnants of the missiles that were shown in the pictures that came out from that territory, were actually indicative of surface to air missiles that came from a soviet, made it missile air defense system that was only used by the ukrainian military. so that's definitely something interesting to, to, to take into account here we're talking about as 300 missiles, which by the way,

our s 300 missile systems rather which by the way, cannot even hit ground targets instead of waiting for any of the information to come out basically, after this became known, we heard from ukrainian officials immediately pointing the finger at russia. we heard from ukraine's foreign minister, who on twitter said that the now widely accepted story of events, which is which is that ukrainian missile fell on polish territory. was a conspiracy theory that russia was spreading around. that's what ukraine's foreign minister said, and we also heard from lot of mirrors the lensky who said that there should be consequences. there should be action taken against russia for this. i mean, it was as if that were, the ukrainian president was ready to sacrifice his entire country in the 3rd world war over this scheme. how many times, as you claim said that the actions of the terrorist state will not be limited to our country alone. pissing nato territory with missiles. this is a russian missile attack on collective security. this is a really significant escalation action is needed. russia now promotes

a conspiracy theory that it was allegedly a missile of ukrainian air defense that fell on the polish theory, which is not true. no one should buy russian propaganda or amplify its messages. this lesson should have been long learned since the downing of hash m h 17. now it's also important to note that right after all this took place, we started hearing talk among western politicians and the western media about nato, potentially invoking articles 4 or 5 of its charter. and just to give our viewers an idea of what that is, article 5 of the charter says, an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against all. so as the story was unraveling and it became clearer and clearer that it was likely kia was to blame for this, many were wondering if nato would come down on kiev as hard as it would on moscow. but based on sultan burges recent comments, it's clearly not going to be the case. immediately after this happened, we started seeing a headline saying that this was

a russian attack on polish territory. and there was no shortage of sensationalism either. we saw headline saying that it was a shocking act on behalf of russia some saying that this is going to be lead up to the 3rd world war. one even said that russia had bombed poland and also in on western television screens, there was no shortage of this kind of hysteria. either nature, he shouldn't be restrained, at least in its language, in its message to russia, were the us need to adjust its force posture there. and there is actually a lot that nato could do. and this is, in fact exactly the kind of scenario that journalists like myself, have been posing to nato. what exactly does it mean that you will descend every inch of the alliance territory? so that's going to be put to the test. now, what would that mean? now, for this conflict, and whether it now spills toward, elicits a reaction from nato, these kinds of reports. they're definitely shocking, but actually not very surprising because throughout russia, a special military military operation. we've kind of seen western media just

blindly parenting what key of the saying about the conflict without doing any sort of critical examination of that information. so here again, we see this the same kind of thirst for a 3rd world war that came out of key of is seen basically republished in the western media nato allies in the both take. so i've been singing the same tune as ukraine accusing russia directly attacking the block and cooling for immediate reaction. rush and miss south hitting the territory of the ne to members a very dangerous escalation by the kremlin latch bay expresses full solidarity with our ally, poland, and will support any action deems appropriate by poland. russia will bear full responsibility for all the consequences. latest news from poland is most concerning . we are consulting closely with poland and other allies. estonia is ready to defend every inch of nato territory. we are in full solidarity with our close

allied poland. australia spoke to dr. stephen gaia, a professor at the institute of european studies in belgrade, and he says, an escalation in the ukraine conflict to the no one in no one's interests apart from kids. i honestly did not expect an escalation, but i did expect a lot of hysteria. unfortunately, you know, in many eastern european societies, are there is this war mongering unless he culture in the last a couple of months, which are really that is growing out of proportion. i think they're very responsible, especially for countries bordering, ah, bordering russia, that are members of nato because it's the last thing for tara national interest would be to actually on get involved in a conflict and, and for the conflict to escalate. i mean, i expect it to be down played look at what happened with the investigation about

the north stream. we have an elephant in the room. ah, and we have germany and france which became literally a punching bag for london in washington. even give, ah, and they are not even almost, they're not even allowed to talk about the, you know, who was the perpetrator. what i see is not only censorship, let's say when it comes to do the lives of, of people who work for cancelled. but also it seems that certain countries are being muted and especially i said, the core of european union that the biggest victim of the war is the you, which is being shipped from from powers and by the, by the anglo american coalition. the u. s. department of homeland security secretary has said americans that shouldn't worry about a nuclear escalation in ukraine as any destination in europe wouldn't reach the u.

s. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest. we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . me well form a u. s. president. donald trump announcing he would love the president in 2024 accused. the global community of overlooking the nuclear threats. to renew deal and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately or never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot. a bow grade based professor stephen guy had to again say that an atmosphere of global paranoia over the situation in ukraine is

creating a real nuclear threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent. and people get used to it, i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistic for literally, but because of because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoid is so high that certain events can be misread by the other side. and then, you know, things can go out of course, just because of a series of mistakes, and i think that we are in a really grave, a situation of a possible ha, global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes after we're done with the

imminent threat. when we want a key meeting between the chinese on british leaders on the side lines of the t 20 has been scuppered by the overnight incident in poland, where she's still not worth expected to face president. she's paying for that 1st step of meeting, which would be the 1st face face talks between a chinese and put to sleep during 5 years. with many ac was on the table there solely ahead of the schedule discussion to not get took off to attend an urgent meeting with brittany g 7 and nato partners. instead. we'll as discuss these developments with martin j award winning journalist on that. it's a of margaret b dot org news outlets. many thanks for joining us on the program martin. so what's your reaction to this cancellation of the meeting between the british chinese leaders? what sort of message do you think london is sending? well, i'm disappointed, but no insight is surprised. i mean, i think that the actual meeting it so was a huge event officials i started talking about a day before normally such meetings are prepared weeks in advance. so no hiccups

and disagreements or for parks in front of the cameras. i think the message that it sends is that the british prime minister now who we haven't had one who's met she in 5 years. so i think he was, was actually taking a step in the right direction as being pragmatic saying look, we should talk, but some, he's such a poodle of the american. so it's actually very difficult to take him seriously in any respect. so i am quite disappointed. but other, say not know until you surprised. so what do you think that you can really wants to achieve in his relations with china and wilson if a base in there's not much in it for by jim really other than to keep cor relations with a lot of these western countries, which are huge, expanding markets for them, you know, for the western conflict, britain and america, they've got trade deficit with china, which they desperately want to redress. you know, in the case of britain, it's something like between 3 and 4 times when we import from china that we export

. and i think cynic probably wants to try to do something about in facing a nickel economic calamity in britain. increasing trade in china would be a good way around that, but it's very difficult in the present circumstances, there's not much dialogues increasing tension between the west and china and, you know, so there was an opportunity. i think it was lost by a cynic when it comes to the prospects of relations between china and the u. k. how does the political activity of russia in the us play into the big picture here? well, i think there's a huge role because the china, the beginning of the war was not quite sure, but where it was going to go when it finally went with russian support. russia. and what we're seeing increasingly is that we study every inch in every mile. the ground in ukraine moving in both directions, but more recently, ukrainians, gaining ground in the mistake that we make in the west. i think certainly don't

this make is that russia is using the wars in reality, the big picture of ukraine war is not a nuclear holes. around the world, and what we've seen, we have seen in recent months, is a massive shift on the global self. countries who don't necessarily agree with boots in position in crane, but actually are sick and tired of him and it's being slowed down the throats, america from london and so on. and so have moved over towards this new emerging eastern blog, which is not a name yet. you know, bricks has got new members, right across the world, signing up, wanting to join it to the ceo as well. so i was trying to cooperation and so you know, things that shift and this effects relationships very much in if, if britain can't really understand and predicts where it stands in the next 5 or 10 years in the shifting ground, there's not really have much positions to towards the chinese on any level. so build politics. those play a big role and ment stickler when we talk about china,

we talk about tie one because all of the experts are saying it's only a question of time for the chinese move into play one, but they won't do that while the war ukraine is going on and if soon i can see do have a, get the chart on the tide line. do you expect them to talk about tie one already thought. so i'm trying to speak with the u. s. and something that the u. k. wouldn't get involved in? well, he awesome, i mean sort of hasn't stuck his neck and made statements about taiwan. unlike trust before him, he was only in office 44 days, so he's playing it very care. but it's incredibly disappointing. whenever german is asking questions about any of these big issues today, he just referred to the americans. you said, well, you know, if you look at american foreign policy and what the american doing, and we very much aligned to that, you know, hugely disappointing. you know, that we've become such of such a poodle, you know, with, with the americans, we don't even have a foreign policy anymore. so it's very difficult to imagine what those 2 would

discuss when you get together. i would imagine that soon we'll try and use human rights leverage to try and work better working relationship and improve trade. give british companies a bit of a bigger break. they've got change in china and trying to address this. this does just trade in balance. but he won't talk about china taiwan on. imagine that many thanks for joining in the program. really appreciate your thoughts. martin j award winning journalist, editor of mcgray b dot org and news outlet. the african union, which includes $55.00 countries, should become a permanent member of the g 20. that's according to the south african president to say the global food and the energy crisis can only be solved with the continents help we call for continued g 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as

a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and energy and security across our world. africa, this is, has been one of the main topics that the c s g 20 summit is the continent. faith of increasing hunger. china is president, has also box the idea of inviting more african countries to join the tional. great off the world's total. my shyness supports the african union succession to the g 20 . the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account with both a professor anthony van at new kirk. he thinks it's crucial for africa to continue with international organizations. if it's the voice is to be heard, the g 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance their own prospects in the global economy and, and local governance. by the way. there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important, i think,

for africa then the g. 20, many of the problems in africa relating to peace, security conflict, instability, resort exploitation are caused by colonial. any period behavior by exploitation, by external actors, and so many of the problems that to africa faces are not caused by africa. so although we can't escape some blame of course, but nevertheless, some of the big issues. for example, you know, when orland gas when actually sources are discovered, then the former colonial masters are quick to, to, to jump into africa with promises of development, aid and support, and a seat at the table, all important decision making, machinery and instruments. but we know what the agenda are, which is why my view. it is important for the, for africa entity presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the t 20 to protect it

interests and enhance its own stature. but at the same time, it cannot be the only international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the way, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. briggs, i think, is really important and might become even more important in the global term will that we are going through and some even speak ahead of i will of the non line movement maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa, different options to choose from. and as must be very careful who it makes lions as, as we faced this turbulent time globally, ah, ukrainian government website that hated to raising funds. the key of war effort has been deleted 2 days before multiple scandals involving its crypto currency partner ruptured as, according to the greys own news website. and the partnership with the crypto currency exchange f t x was birth announced back in march 20 k of lowest in size

for donations f t. x pledge to convert contributions into cash, which would then be sent spent on amunition and humanitarian aid. $60000000.00 was said to have been subsequently received, however days before f t x, columbia. the ukrainian website was taken down grades and reported that prior to the disappearance, the amount of donations have not been officially updated for some time raising concerns over how much had been raised and how much had been distributed. well, let's get the details on this now from the all of the grades and report himself kids, clara burge who's also the outlet u. k. editor. many thanks for joining us on the program kids now your investigation certainly raises plenty of questions. so could, could you please break down the details of these allegations that ukraine raised $60000000.00 through f t x and then spend that money on his war efforts with 0 accountability? have i got that right? yeah, just about, i mean,

look funny mentally. this is louis with much fanfare in march on march 14th, that it was set by that point that you created already to see about a 100000000 encrypts reservations, which is already spent since february 20 for now this website in on april 1st or 2 weeks after it was loads, it updated its records to state that it had received $70000000.00. this was revised down to over 60000005 days later. it's not clear why that could be missing 10000000 in the mix. that other very least already. but then what really, quite bizarre is in a boat in april and in july it published updates of all of its spending on various weapons radios and fuel. rushes was one of the things you might need while you fight a war, but it doesn't appear to gain anymore funds the total of 60000000 or was it 70000000. we don't know was unchanging throughout the entire year until the website

is mysteriously deleted. late october and then replaced with the standalone website to aid for ukraine. a few days later it was thought they've done that just before. ready gets thrust into a, you know, international financials can generally historic proportions. it is not clear whether any more money was raised and if so, where it went, whether it was followed to ukraine or some kind of black fund, 4 of the books operations that she entered. it's west back is the one that was not in the public domain, or whether it was embezzled, white, fried shelf. you know, the 2 year old tech guru who was behind this company over the democratic party to which the tree just needed tens of millions over the past 3 years. and you were pull. you also mentioned that one of ukraine's biggest single expenditures from the crypto donations with $5000000.00 on a worldwide. and he will media campaign,

the details of which would only be published off the ukraine's victory. why exactly would care have refused to be immediately transparent on where the money is actually going? well, i mean, i would imagine that the trainings and again, the western back is, would be somewhat keen to suppress the extent of that powers of many medium manipulation and control deep vos bar sums they pumped into manipulating western or due to the surface of this prop proxy this could involve effect bribing journalist . this happens all the time. you know, funding p off to mount elaborate wide red, wide ranging prop again, glitches on that. i mean, again, we don't really know that they would have every interested in keeping the fine details of the ways in which they manipulate and tell us and pressure people into sending them incalculable amounts of weapons and financial aid is achieved. other

said, you investigation certainly raises plenty of questions here. have the mainstream media, western media picked up any of these details. you know, i mean, and this is, you know, of course you have to be expected. i mean, you know, all the information is that all public domain, even though yes, the government seems to have taken measures to raise quite a lot of this means that you can still find that using web archive. i mean, it's quite extraordinary that the, the, the collapse of f d x has been documented in the forensic minute by minute detail is dominating by the financial media and the wider mainstream press. day by day more and more reports all of our fraud. and this is back to the freed up rates in which allows him to take funds out of that t x without anyone noticing and potentially pocket to himself or pass on to other

company seemingly fraudulent company. but no one has only the very obvious. ready of why, how or how on earth a donation resource for you? too much. and then the power, the only raises 60000000 in its 1st 2 and a half weeks of ration. but you know, has been open donations the whole time. i mean, it seems inconceivable as see more police how much we don't know where it's going. we've no idea. and we need the officers. natalie. okay. what's your take on the timing of the lead ukrainian schema, which is wrapped up very quietly, 2 days before the f t x collapsed off to be exposed to the scam? i mean, you know, the, i mean this is almost rosetta stone point. you know, in the, in the narrative me so yes, is in october 26th, or thereabouts. that the original to night to ukraine or to a ukraine website is quietly leads it. i'm on november 1st 8 entirely. yes. standalone and see is registered using a m. i, p mosque had such

a known can be quite sure of who actually created it. and it could be a perfectly emulates, existed before. but then, you know, the narrative is narrative as well. okay. it wasn't receiving donations anyway. why would you launch a new website? why would you not just close it down? this is all very, very strange. i think that the, i mean, it should just be to incidents but 5 days before the website was treated october 21st at texas financial authorities now. and she and investigations were yet to potentially legal practices and sally legal financial products. you know, this was largely ignored, towing by the media. it was regarded, it's just, you know, a fairly mundane example of regulators cracking down on the large, the unregulated and essentially criminal crits, a currency industry more, more generally. but you know, if a t x was a fraudulent yes,

some back and freed seems to have high level connection with c. ready democrats in us politicians, he's visited the white house almost every week this year. ready to discuss, god knows what this would have said, alarm bells ringing across washington and thus he at. ready need to know the paper trial relates to this entity. so setting up a new, a new organizational new interface might have yes. your cervical dummy or from purpose can't 20 thanks for joining than a problem. really appreciate your time and explaining as to why is the way we've been speaking to kit, clara, and bag. be a great a. thank you. my pleasure. me thanks to you for joining us here on all t international web back at the top of the hour with all the very latest we see them. ah,

for some reason a number of so called european intellectuals and politicians maintain the e. u represents the highest level of human development we're told europe is a garden and the rest of us live in the jungle. rhetoric aside, europe is in serious trouble, hardly a model for the rest of the world. in fact, europe is declining into irrelevance. ah ah ah, in the ukranian oligarchs, private armies, a murdering thug had a salary of $1300.00 a month for this the well nationalist battalion fighters.