when you buy a new one, you can look it up by mia? the the the, the, the headlines on all the international holdings make the use her know the incident that killed 2 people near the border with ukraine as well. so i met for miss all, apparently came from k ups defensive. i was not launched by russia at the earliest suggested well, that's the key point the finger at moscow and calls on a post to way in with the 4th, despite the block teeth saying there's no indication that miss or crash which likely came from ukraine was deliberate or the russia is taking targets the ally of

the south african liter calls on the g 20 group to accept more countries from the continent into the rank of africans push for a bigger role in politics the sunday pm here in the russian capital and mister garcia, international with the very latest world news update. welcome to you. now the polish president has made a u turn on the missile crisis off the initially blaming moscow. president, dude on now says he has no evidence that the missile, which fell in the eastern poland, killing 2 locals, was launched by the russian military. he's also admitted that ukraine's at the fences were likely responsible for the incident. most likely, it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was a missile fired by the russian side. much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland. now as chief is also doubled

down on the fact that has nothing to implicate russia in the incident, which was apparently caused by a ukrainian missile. the leader of the u. s. lead blockhouse essays most goes clearly, not trying to target the alliance have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and you have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the insolent will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense. miss arn fired to the friends ukrainian territory against the russian cruise missile attacks. but let me be clear, this is not ukraine's fault. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility. ah, it continues it's illegal war against ukraine. he has, meanwhile,

refuses to accept that the miss al came from ukraine, demanding his representatives, are allowed to visit the site to investigate. ortiz donald quarter takes a closer look at the controversy. this appears to indicate that warsaw may be more interested in just pointing the finger at russia and risking in all out global war than it actually is interested in getting down to the facts as to whose weapons actually killed 2 polish citizens in this impact near the border because let's not forget, poland began to imply that this was russia's fault after it began saying that these missiles that landed there were, or rather missile or missiles were actually russian made. and after giving in to all this hysteria, giving rise to it in the western media among western politicians, it only then said it was going to have an emergency meeting to discuss what is actually known about the situation and then decide what to do from there. so naturally this evoke to not so nice reaction from moscow. we heard from the kremlin spokesman, who said, basically what, why didn't war saw just tell the truth to begin with. poland could have immediately

told the truth about the missile incident. then everyone would have immediately understood that russia had nothing to do with it. but 2nd of all, we have to think about the timing of all this because warsaw reaction actually came just just moments after we. we got reports that joe biden was saying that this was likely a ukrainian missile that hit in the in polish territory and kill those 2 people. so now we have a situation where basically washington and warsaw are actually towing the line of the russian government. because we also heard from russia's defense ministry. they said that the rockets that were shown, or the remnants of the missiles that were shown in the pictures that came out from that territory, were actually indicative of surface to air missiles that came from a soviet, made it missile air defense system that was only used by the ukrainian military. so that's definitely something interesting to, to, to take into account here. we're talking about s 300 missiles, which by the way,

our s 300 missile systems rather which by the way, cannot even hit ground targets instead of waiting for any of the information to come out. basically, after this became known, we heard from ukrainian officials immediately pointing the finger at russia. we heard from ukraine, foreign minister, who on twitter said that the now widely accepted story of events, which is which is that a ukrainian missile fell on post territory. was a conspiracy theory that russia was spreading around. that's what ukraine's foreign minister said, and we also heard from lot of mirrors, lensky, who said that there should be consequences, there should be action taken against russia for this. i mean, it was as if that was the ukrainian president was ready to sacrifice his entire country in the 3rd world war over this scheme. how many times, as you claim said that the actions of the terrorist state will not be limited to our country alone. pissing nato territory with missiles. this is a russian missile attack on collective security. but this is a really significant escalation. action is needed. russian now promotes

a conspiracy theory that it was allegedly a missile of ukrainian air defense that fell on the polish theory, which is not true. no one should buy russian propaganda or amplify its messages. this lesson should have been long learned since the downing of hash m h 17. now it's also important to note that right after all this took place, we started hearing talk among western politicians and the western media about nato, potentially invoking articles 4 or 5 of its charter. and just to give our viewers an idea of what that is, article 5 of the charter says, an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against all. so as the story was unraveling and it became clearer and clearer that it was likely kia was to blame for this, many were wondering if nato would come down on as hard as it would on moscow. but based on stoughton burges recent comments, it's clearly not going to be the case immediately after this happened, we started seeing a headline saying that this was a russian attack on polish territory. and there was no shortage of sensationalism

either. we saw headlines saying that it was a shocking act on behalf of russia some saying that this is going to be lead up to 3rd world war one even said that russia had bombed poland and also in what on western television screens, there was no shortage of this kind of hysteria, either native, he shouldn't be restrained, at least in its language, in its message to russia. would the us need to adjust its force posture there. and there is actually a lot that nato could do. and this is, in fact exactly the kind of scenario that journalists like myself, have been posing to nato. what exactly does it mean that you will defend every inch of the alliance territory? so that's going to be put to the test. now, what would that mean? now, for this conflict, and whether it now spills toward, elicits a reaction from nato, these kinds of reports. they're definitely shocking, but actually not very surprising because throughout russia special millet military operation, we've kind of seen western media just blindly parroting what keith is saying about

the conflict without doing any sort of critical examination of that information. so here again, we see this the same kind of thirst for a 3rd world war that came out of key of is seen basically republished in the western media. that has both taken members have been singing the same tune as ukraine, accusing russia directly attacking block member poland russian. miss south. hidden the territory of the ne, to members a very dangerous escalation by the kremlin lots. they express full solidarity with our ally, poland, and will support any action deems appropriate by poland. russia will bear full responsibility for all the consequences. latest news from poland is most concerning . we're consulting closely with poland and other allies. estonia is ready to defend every inch of nato territory. we are in full solidarity with our close allies. poland, well as cross at 2 journalist and political analysts, john verola,

now many thanks for joining us on the program. and they tell us, chief, has doubled down on the fact there is nothing to implicate russia and the incident which was apparently caused by ukrainian miss all. but at the same time, you install some becker's tried to play moscow for what happened was you'll take on nato's thoughts on best incidence. well, this is a war of nerves. it's a, it's a propaganda war of the site. sy, off the idea is to, under russia under moscow so that they relent, so that they pull back from the conflict with ukraine. and of course, it's not going to work because russia is fighting for survival, right? nature has been very clear that their goal is to destroy russia. the russia obviously could continue this, fight, victoria, and so natal relax. nato has to relent you at 70 tonsil. has that the quote no matter his walk, it was for whatever reason it fell in poland. this would not have happened if we had not started the war against ukraine. does he have a point?

oh no, he has no point and he's his line clearly lie and he knows that this war began in spring 2014, when he began, brutally subjugating the so called separatists. the ethnic russian population and dunbar was very care. that's when the war began. that's going to work again in russia and intervention. this conflict is merely protecting the ethnic minority in dawn, but that's before it into the conflict. anyone who tells you otherwise they are lying or they are ignorant to me. very, very clear about that. i mean, while the estonian prime minister has said that if the miss all the felon potent was ukrainian, but it's clear that it was not an attack on poland. so does that mean the kid which is the magically be considered innocence bias western allies? i mean, as you know, ukraine is a de facto natal protector, it and it's being used as a pawn, as a battering ram to attack. russia could destroy russia. they mean this has been the

plan going back for many years. so, an american official told cnn that the ukrainian military warrants the us and its allies, that it attempted to intercept to russian missile of the same time. and near the area of the instance in poland. does that sound like an admission of guilt by the ukrainians to no, i mean, certainly, but, you know, we have to be very clear. nato is a partner to this conflict, right? nato troops are fighting in ukraine, killing russian civilians killing russian soldiers. they should not be there, nato should not at all. busy be in this conflict, right. so i am an american, obviously, i'm a technically a member, i citizen of a nato country and i don't have no idea why we are fighting to protect the poorest country in europe, the most corrupt country in europe. i think a lot of americans feel this way. and the pentagon spokes person referred to cnn to

comments made by the us president joe biden last night when he said it's unlikely in the minds of the trajectory that the missile was fired from russia. solely off to that statement, the polish president admitted that the ukrainian defense system was most likely responsible, doesn't look to you like the u. s. is setting the tone when it comes to assigning blame for this incident. i mean, again, we have to go back to the very origin, washington or the u. s. has been behind this since the very beginning, since the cool, cool in, in 2014. so this has all been carefully planned, organized, orchestrated from washington. washington is calling the shots. border is a certainly are certainly a very aggressive anti russian state. but the end of the dog again, the day. it's just a bo god for washington. everybody was so quick to point. fingers weren't they, do you think polling should have waited until there was more conclusive evidence of who actually find them. it's all before trying to pin the blame on moscow.

certainly, again, poland is, is the bulldog. it's very aggressive. it wants to attack russia. i'm looking for any excuse. my name is troops are fighting in ukraine, killing russian civilian killing russian soldiers. so, but again though, who holds the leech? washington on the leash and washington quickly brought poland into line under control. so how significant do you think this particular incident is in the big picture of the conflict in ukraine will sort of run of occasions. do you think we should expect? it's not really too significant. but at the same time, countries like poland have to be real life at the real life, they are legitimate, really took no targets. there are sending soldiers and weapons a to the battlefield, kill russian civilian russian soldier, ponies, legitimate target. i'm sorry, that's just an objective fact. they have to be very careful about that. washington has the thing very careful. worser has to think very carefully what they're doing.

i think everybody is waiting for the points at which ukraine will feel that it's ready to sit down for talks with brushes and paste, talk, send some truth talks, at least. do you think that this incident could finally be the purchase them to the negotiating table or at least could kids western allies try to push that agenda? now they can travel distinguish between truth and a piece that can be a truth, which is obviously something temporary before finding begin. again, that's possible. that could be a truth. can there be no there? cathy piece. there only can be one victor. both sides have made it very clear that there can be one victor. this words going to go on until there's one man standing well, one blocks and in the rush or naval sample. let's go unless john valley many thanks for joining us on the program. really great to get your thoughts on this. thank you . but us like what terry of homeland security has that americans shouldn't worry about a possible nuclear escalation in ukraine as any such destination in europe wouldn't

reach for us anyway. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . may well, donald trump, who is the now he will once a president again in 2024 has accused the global community of overlooking the nuclear renew deals. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately, or never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot belgrade bass, professor steven guy. it says that an atmosphere of

a global paranoia over the situation in ukraine is creating a real nuclear threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent and people get used to it. i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to go ballistic for literally, but because because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoia is so high that certain events can be misreads by the other side. and then what things can do, go out of course, just because of a series of mistakes. and i think that we are in a really a grave, a situation of a possible, a global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes off or we are done with the

imminent threat. meanwhile, a key meeting between the chinese and british ladies on the sidelines of the g. 20 has been scuppered by the overnight instant in poland, where she soon i was expected to face president sheet in paying for that 1st step of meeting, which would be the 1st face to face talk between a chinese and british leader in 5 years with many issues on the table, there's only ahead of the scheduled discussions do not took off to attend an urgent meeting with britain's g 7 and nato partners. instead. journalist martin j sooner is not really an independent leader as he still answers to washington when it comes to foreign policy. well, i'm disappointed, but not entirely surprised. it was actually taking a step in the right direction is being pragmatic. spangler, we should talk, but some, he's such a poodle of the americans, that it's actually very difficult to take him seriously. in any respect he today, he just referred to americans. he said, when, you know, if you look at american foreign policy in what the americans are doing it with,

are much aligned to that. you know, it's hugely disappointing. you know, that we've become such a pathetic poodle in our, with, with the americans. we don't even ever a foreign policy anymore. so it's very difficult to imagine what those 2 would discuss. we have seen in recent months is a massive shift on the global self. countries who don't necessarily agree with putin serve position in ukraine, but actually are sick and tired of the gemini that's being forced on the throats from america and from london and so on. and so have moved over towards this new emerging eastern block, which i think her name yet, you know, and bricks has got new members are right across the world. signing up, wanted to join it to look at the seo as well as south shawnee corporation. and so, you know, when things a shift and this affects relationships very much in a if, if britain can't really understand and predicts where it stands, the next 5 or 10 years in the shifting ground, there's not really gonna have much position to talk to the chinese on any level,

so g, about build politics, play a big role, international grain shipment, sand escalating, global hunger were among the main topics of the g 20 summit, which is wrapped up in barley marshes. foreign minister agreed in moscow is interested in an extension of the great deal allowing russian and ukrainian wheat and fertilizers to be exported through the black sea. but only if the supplies actually go to the countries and meet them the most. on the fine lines of the summit, we spoke to the russian minister of finance about the grain and energy crises. he said the luscious activity at the summit proves that the west has failed to isolate moscow. but just looking over no symptoms. yes indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relate to the russian federation, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization. you're asking about continuing the grain bill to that many g 20 countries proposed

to continue the deal. because we all see the situation with hunger in the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain food to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal and the source of communication with colleagues. so as a lover of speaking of the summit of leaders said that russia is for the continuation of the deal only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries. and countries with the european economy as is happening now. therefore, we spoke in favor of continuing the deal under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions had them since they lead to price increases and such increases in the, the grow for the economy. and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources.

removing all barriers that prevent us from exporting our and he resorted to other countries. and today, there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy, and the g 20 itself was it was considered the issue with the world economy and its dynamics. all this was stressed by the russian delegation. i think the western countries heard this on behalf of our entire delegation. i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes. in the speeches of an individual western countries joining the events of the g 20. there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and culture rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy and not a single issue can be resolved without us versus usa system. the african union, which includes $55.00 countries that should become a permanent member, the g 20. as, according to the south african president, he says, the global food and energy crisis can only be solved with the continence help. we

call for continued g 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms. in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and energy and security across our world. africa's issues have been one of the main topics that this is g 20 summit as the continent face is increasing hunger. china's president, as also by the idea of inviting more african countries to join the international, great 3 percent of the world's total. my group, china's supports the african union succession to the g 20. the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account. professor antony van at new kirk says it's crucial for african countries to play a big a role in international groups like the g 20. the g 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance data and

prospects in the global economy and global governance. by the way, there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important. i think for africa than the g. 20, many of the problems in africa relating to p security, conflict, instability. but a source exploitation are caused by colonial, any period behavior by exploitation, by external actors. and so many of the problems that africa faces are not caused by africa itself, although we can't escape some blame of course. but nevertheless, some of the big issues, for example, you know, when well and gas when the sources are discovered, their former colonial mosque, these are quick to, to jump into africa with promises of development, aid and support, and a seat at the table, all important decision making machinery and instruments back,

we know what the agenda are, which is why my view. it is important for the f for africa additive presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the g 20 to protect its interests and enhance its own stature. but at the same time, can a, it cannot be the only in international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the west, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. freaks i think is really important and might become even more important in this global term will that we are going through and some even speak of a revival of the non in line movement, maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa has different options to choose from, and as must be very careful who it makes alliances. but as we faced this turbulent time globally, her son has announced his military mission withdraw from molly ahead of schedule, the african country. the ruling johnson has now turned to the russian private

paramilitary wagner group to help fight against the islamist insurgents. now, according to a u. k, government minister, the troops with opposed to remain in mali for 3 years, but would now be pulled out over the next 6 months. around 300 british soldiers was sent to the country in 2020, to protect local from islamic militants as part of the un mission. however, the client, this has recently escalated the ruling john to has begun working with russians, talking to group and response from also withdrew from molly and the decade long presence in the african country. meanwhile, the leaders of marley and bettina also held 3 meetings and a tightening cooperation in the fight against terrorism. a local journalists census this report. so he says visit, admirable, possible cup tele brim tower has chosen by my call to pay a visit to your is the army for us to be great. that makes sense.

so most of the women a week later means of defense of monday. i've the head of a high level delegation, was that what that do go for meeting with colleague of looking at possible security is a common issue between the 2 countries. there is a need of type corporation between the 2 armies, including the choice of to be going made the choice of buckner showed you, but i am told a follow him looking at possible molly, sharing the same border one going to 200 kilometer. if please wait till the group actually 3 bought as well. and if i were to put the pressure on those with then lee will see what that was. wells i spoke to some local citizens. they said their assessment of the long running and controversial french involvement in molly. oh,

paris shouldn't interfere with what we are doing here as burkina faso belongs to us . paris has no say in deciding its future. my lousy paris is war it as it can lose a colony like the wants it sees in balkan faso. and molly, when we are confident that russia consoles our problem with the equipment they have, we believe that they can help us fight terrorism. luke, we are not satisfied, would he sits, we shall in book, enough fossil we can understand what is happening in there. we also do understand why we keep on suffering defeats. we support of such will equipped latrice and the french needed political analysts and muddy abraham county says the european military missions in marley have failed to yield any positive results for locals. equal look at all the european come in and money and you know, i thought if you didn't get to any activity or the pollution

or from the government that in especially in my so i don't think so any more for them. i remind you to be in it will be on the situation even if they decide to leave off concrete or are you sure now for us now we'd be happy. it will be, it will be what they know, and we are, they know, because now they've changed any country once a week with africa, with africa from fif might be we must be late on the physical level. ations not on depending idea, nipple and in africa. i think for them for the country, open country for that, but i don't think so if they did, they wanted it on with me. thanks for joining us on our team to national plenty

more updates to be found on our website on dot com. and we'll be back in 30 minutes . ah, for some reason, a number of so called european intellectuals and politicians maintain the you represents the highest level of human development. we are told europe is a garden and the rest of us live in the jungle. rhetoric aside, europe is in serious trouble, hardly a model for the rest of the world. in fact, europe is declining into irrelevance. ah, ah, with a

with ah. so with our shoes on yeah, americans gray you road, you have to really just touch not good to know ceiling and provide you are still searching for a child voicing.