of alyssa holla, but usually i used to live with this with with the headlines on all the international, poland makes a u turn on the incident that killed 2 people near the border with ukraine. as war, thor admit, that miss all apparently came from key of the air defenses. them was not by russia as early as suggested without the key f points, the finger at moscow and called on nato to way in with the force. despite the blocks chief saying, there's no indication that miss r crash, which likely came from ukraine, was deliberate, so that russia is thinking to target the online. oh that it's our,

the south african lee that calls on the g 20 group to accept more countries from the continent into their ranks as africans push for a bigger role in jail. polk with it's 9 pm here in the russian capitalism is hasanti international. with the latest the world news update is very good to have you with us. and we start with the polish president who has made a u. turn on the missile crisis off to initially blaming moscow. president do dot now says he has no evidence that the missile, which fell in east in poland, killing 2 locals, was launched by the russian military. it's also admitted that ukraine's ad offenses were likely responsible. most likely, it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was a missile fired by the russian side. much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland. latest chief has doubled down

on the fact there's nothing to implicate russia in the incident which was apparently caused by a ukrainian missile. the leader of the u. s. block also says moscow is clearly not trying to target the alliance have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and you have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the insolent will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense. miss arn fired to the fens ukrainian territory against russian cruise missile attacks. but let me be clear, this is not ukraine's fault. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility ass if continuous it's illegal, war against ukraine. kia, meanwhile, refuses to accept that the message came from ukraine,

demanding as representatives are allowed to visit the site. to investigate ortiz donald court, i takes a closer look. this appears to indicate that warsaw may be more interested in just pointing the finger at russia and risking in all our global war than it actually is interested in getting down to the facts as to whose weapons actually killed 2 polish citizens in this impact near the border because let's not forget, poland began to imply that this was russia's fault after it began saying that these missiles that landed there were, or rather missile or missiles were actually russian made. and after giving into all this hysteria, giving rise to it in the western media among western politicians, it only then said it was going to have an emergency meeting to discuss what is actually known about the situation and then decide what to do from there. so naturally this evoke to not so nice reaction from moscow. we heard from the kremlin spokesmen who said, basically why didn't war saw just tell the truth to begin with. poland could have

immediately told the truth about the missile incident. then everyone would have immediately understood that russia had nothing to do with it. but 2nd of all, we have to think about the timing of all this because we're saw reaction actually came just just moments after we got reports that joe biden was saying that this was likely a ukrainian missile that hit in the input was territory and kill those 2 people, so now we have a situation where basically washington and warsaw are actually towing the line of the russian government. because we also heard from russia's defense ministry. they said that the rockets that were shown are the remnants of the missiles that were shown in the pictures that came out from that territory were actually indicative of surface to air missiles that came from a soviet made in missile the air defense system that was only used by the ukrainian military, so that's definitely something interesting to, to take into account here. we're talking about s 300 missiles, which by the way, our f 300 missile systems rather which by the way,

cannot even hit ground targets instead of waiting for any of the information to come out. basically, after this became known, we heard from ukraine and officials immediately pointing the finger at russia. we heard from ukraine's foreign minister, who on twitter said that the now widely accepted story of events, which is which is that a ukrainian missile fell on polish territory, was a conspiracy theory that russia was spreading around. that's what ukraine's foreign minister said. and we also heard from latimer zalinski, who said that there should be consequences, there should be action taken against russia for this. i mean, it was as if that there were the ukrainian president was ready to sacrifice his entire country in the 3rd world war over this scheme as you, how many times as you claim said that the actions of the terrorist state will not be limited to our country alone, pissing nato territory with missiles. this is a russian missile attack on collective security, but this is a really significant escalation. action is needed. russian now promotes a conspiracy theory that it was allegedly

a missile of ukrainian air defense that fell on the polish theory, which is not true. no one should buy russian propaganda or amplify its messages. this lesson should have been long learned since the downing of hash m h 17. and it's also important to note that right after all this took place, we started hearing talk among western politicians and the western media about nato, potentially invoking articles 4 or 5 of its charter. and just to give our viewers an idea of what that is, article 5 of the charter says, an armed attack against one shall be considered an attack against all. so as the story was unraveling and it became clearer and clearer that it was likely key of was to blame for this. many were wondering if nato would come down on key of as hard as it would on moscow. but based on a stilton burges recent comments, it's clearly not going to be the case. immediately after this happened, we started seeing headlines saying that this was a russian attack on polish territory. and there was no shortage of sensationalism.

either. we saw a headline saying that it was a shocking act on behalf of russia. some saying that this is going to be a lead up to 3rd world war one even said that russia had bomb to poland and also in what on western television screens, there was no shortage of this kind of hysteria. either nature, he has shouldn't be restrained, at least in its language, in its message to russia. would the us need to adjust its force posture there. and there is actually a lot that nato could do. and this is, in fact exactly the kind of scenario that journalists like myself, have been posing to nato. what exactly does it mean that you will defend every inch of the alliance territory? so that's going to be put to the test. now, what would that mean? now, for this conflict, and whether it now spills toward, elicits a reaction from nato, these kinds of reports. they're definitely shocking, but actually not very surprising because throughout russia's special moment military operation. we've kind of seen western media just blindly parroting what

keith is saying about the conflict without doing any sort of critical examination of that information. so here again, we see this the same kind of thirst for a 3rd world war that came out of key of is seen basically republished in the western media. it has both take members have been thinking the same tune as ukraine, accusing russia of directly attacking blow, commend the poland. russian missiles hidden, the territory of the night to members, a very dangerous escalation by the kremlin. lots bay express is full solidarity with our ally, poland, and will support and the action deems appropriate by poland. russia will bear full responsibility for all the consequences. latest news from poland is most concerning . we are consulting closely with poland and other allies is stony as ready to defend every inch of nato territory. we are in full solidarity with our close ally, poland journalists on political analysts. john thoroughly says the west is likely

to turn a blind eye to ukraine's involvement in the missile crisis created a native protect, or, of course, they have blinds to do whatever they want. any outrage provocation is acceptable for nato. any ukranian publications. this is a war of nerves. it's a propaganda war of the site. sy, up the idea is to, under russia under moscow. and, you know, ukraine, the de facto protectorate of nato, of the usa. so they can of course, do whatever they want and it will be forgiven. it will be it'll be ignored. for example, incident like this. ok, so they, so you frame kill to always be no big deal of russia did it. we're going to vote article 5. let's start world war 3. you're dealing with extremely on hand, irresponsible people in washington in london, and then brought them with you crying. anything is possible because they are trying

to drag. you may go into the conflict into their confidence. right? when russia, they are trying to do that. so i think it's quite probable. also, maybe there was an accident. they were trying to shoot down a russian missile. but chances are, this is a deliberate effort to provoke nato to invoke article 5 and through tac, russia possible. and other developments, the us secretary of homeland security says americans shouldn't worry about a possible nuclear escalation and ukraine as any such destination in europe wouldn't reach the us anyway. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . meanwhile, donald trump, whose allows he will, was the president again in 2024, has accused a global community of overlooking the nuclear the renew

deals. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet, nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately, or never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot. well, about great bass professor steven guy. it says that in the atmosphere of global paranoia and the situation in ukraine is creating a real nucleus threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent and the people got used to it. i really think this is more dangerous. not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistic fully thoroughly. but because of because it creates an atmosphere in which

a paranoia is so high that certain events can be misreads by the other side. and then that things can go out of course, just because of a series of mistakes. and i think that we are in a really great a the situation of possible global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, the 4th levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes after we're done with the imminent threat mala key meeting between the chinese and british leaders on the sidelines of the g. 20 has been sculpus by the overnight incident in poland where she was expected to face president. she's paying for the 1st 7 meeting, which would be the 1st space to face talks between a chinese and british leader in 5 years with many issues on the table. but surely ahead of the schedule discussion soon,

i took off to attend an urgent meeting with brittany g 7 and nathan partners instead. journalist martin j tonight is not really an independent leader, and he still says to washington, when it comes to foreign policy. well, i'm disappointed, but not entirely surprised. it was actually taking a step in the right direction. is being pragmatic spangler, we should talk, but some, he's such a poodle of the americans, that it's actually very difficult to take him seriously. in any respect he today, he just referred to americans. he said, when, you know, if you look at american foreign policy and what the americans of doing it with her much aligned to that. you know, hugely disappointing. you know that we've become such a pathetic poodle or inner, with, with the americans. we don't even have a, a foreign policy anymore. so it's very difficult to imagine what those 2 would discuss. we have seen in recent months is a massive shift on the global self countries who don't necessarily agree with putin sir position in ukraine, but actually are sick and tired of the gemini that's being forced on the throats

from america and from london and so on. and so have moved over towards this new emerging eastern block, which i think her name yet, you know, and bricks has got new members are right across the world. signing up, wanted to join it to look at the seo as well as south shawnee corporation. and so, you know, when things a shift and this affects relationships very much in a if, if britain can't really understand and predicts where it stands next 5 or 10 years in the shifting ground, there's not really gonna have much position to talk to the chinese on any level, so g, about build politics, play a big role. well, it's national grain shipman, sand escalating global hunger among the main topics of the g 20 summit, which has wrapped up in barley, luscious, foreign minister, agreed. did. moscow is interested in an extension of the great deal allowing ration and ukrainian weight to answer to lies is to be exported through the black sea. but only if the supplies actually go to the country that neither unless on the

sidelines of the summit we spoke to the russian minister finance about the grain and energy crisis. and he said there rushes activity at the summit. prove that the west has failed to isolate mustang registered nurse him to achieve yes, indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relate to the russian federation such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization you asking about continuing the grain deal. it's true that many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal because we all see the situation with hunger and the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain food to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal, and the source of communication with colleagues says, a love rav. speaking of the summit of leaders said that russia is for the continuation of the deal, but only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries and countries

with the european economy. as is happening now, therefore, we spoke in favor of continuing the deal under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions hit them since they lead to price increases and such increases into the growth of the economy. and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources, removing all barriers that prevent us from exporting our energy resources to other countries. and today, there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy, and the g 20 itself was it was considered the issue with the world economy and its dynamics. all of this was stressed by the russian delegation and i think that the western countries heard this on behalf of our anti delegation. i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes. in the speeches of an individual western countries

joining the events of the g 20. there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and calls who rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy. a not a single issue can be resolved without us versus says, the african union, which includes $55.00 countries, should become a permanent member of the g 20. as according to the south african president who stays the global food and the energy crises can only be solved with the continence help. we call for continued g 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms. in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and energy and security across our world. africa's issues have been one of the main topics that this yes, g 20 summit is the continent face is increasing hunger. china's president is also

back the idea of inviting more african countries to join the international. great, 83 percent. china's supports the african union succession to the g 20. the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account. professor antony, violet, new card phase, is crucial for african countries to play a bigger role in organizations like the g 20. the g. 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance data and prospects in the global economy and local governance. by the way, there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important, i think, for africa than the g. 20 many of the problems in africa relating to peace, security, conflict, instability, but a source exploitation are caused by colonial, any period behavior by exploitation, by external actors. and so many of the problems that africa faces are not caused by

africa itself, although we can't escape some blame of course. but nevertheless, some of the big issues, for example, you know, when well and gas food sources are discovered, their former colonial mosque. these are quick to, to jump into africa with promises of development, aid and support, and a seat at the table, all important decision making machinery and instruments back. we know what the agenda are, which is why my view is important for the f, for africa as it presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the g 20 to protect its interests and enhance its own stature. but at the same time, can it cannot be the only in international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the west, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. freaks i think is really important and might become even more important in this global term will that we are

going through and some even speak of a revival of the non aligned movement, maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa has different options to choose from. and as must be very careful who it makes alliances, but as we faced this turbulent time globally, harrison has announced this military mission will withdraw from molly ahead of schedule. the african countries ruling johnson has now turned to the russian private power and military volcano group to help fight against islamist insurgents . according to a u. k government minister, the troops were supposed to remain in molly for 3 years, but would now be pulled out over the next 6 months. around 300 british soldiers was sent to the country in 2020 to protect locals from islam as the militants, as part of the nation. however, the crisis has recently escalated and the ruling jones has begun working with the washing voc group and responds. france also withdrew from molly and bring it to

decade, long presence in the african country. meanwhile, the leaders of malia became a foster held 2 meetings and a tightening cooperation in the fight against terrorism, a local journalists and this report. so he serv visit abra booking a parcel cup till the brim tower has chosen to pay a visit to the army. to be great if that makes sense. so must be. we met with a week later, let me nissan defense. on monday, i'd be head of a high level delegation. was that what that do go for the meeting with cali of looking at possible security? is that come on issue between the 2 countries that need a type corporation between the 2 armies, including the choice of to be going made the choice of buckner showed you, but i am told a follow him up. also, molly,

are sharing the same border. 1200 kilometer if please wait till the group. actually 3 borders books and mud. countries to put the pressure on those with lea. we'll see what that was. we also spoke to some local citizens who shared their assessments of the long running and controversial french involvement in molly. oh, paris shouldn't interfere with what we are doing here. burkina faso belongs to us. paris has no say in deciding its future. my luggage, paris is war. it does, it can lose a colony like the wants it sees in book, in a faso, in molly, when we are confident that russia consoles our problem with the equipment they have, we believe that they can help us fight terrorism in we are not satisfied with the situation in booking a fossil, we can understand what is happening in there. we also do understand why we keep on

suffering defeats we support of such will. equipped latrice and the french mandated critical analyst at 90. ever him can say, says the european military missions and molly has failed to yield and he positive results for lack of it will look at it all for you before you come in and money. and you know, i even thought if you didn't get to any activity or the pollution or from the government that in especially in my so i don't think so any more money will be impacted on, on the situation. even if they decide to leave off concrete or are you sure now for us now, we'd be happy. it will be, there will be no,

we are going to put the not because now they changed any concrete one to follow up with the, with the, with africa, with african from fif might be we must be late on the physical level. ation not under any idea nipple and in africa. i think it's important for the country open country for no doubt, but i don't think so if they did, they wanted it on with well, joe biden can't seem to get his hands on rushes military muscle. he's managed to get up close and personal with some real rush and muscle instead, as he hopefully jumped on the chance to group a bulky camera man's by sat on the sidelines of the g. 20 summit. his biceps bridges my caps. there is a man and i hope we're in the same. sorry. so he's russian. i don't care who he has got some real biceps. we call them guns training.

well, the camera man who works for russia's tv channel one says he didn't expect such praise from joe biden onto manuel macro. you re show, show month he plays hockey and enjoy working out. say, he's happy, his muscles didn't disappoint. the american president noticed me. he walked right up to me, which i didn't even expect. so i started backing away. he started talking about how big my arms were and then he touched my biceps with thank you for joining us there . when i say international web, back at the top of the app, ah, ah, ah,

ah, watch and it was a shag now shorter one, and i'm not trying to stay like a national z. m no less shyly yours in there. when you buy, when you sit down with, ah, luis to come to russian state will never be on the north lansky

with anyone else with will ban in the european union, the kremlin machine. the state aren't russia today and archie spoke next. even our video agency, roughly all brand on youtube with a was recently, it's been your scarlet. imagine if you speak russian,

keep your voice down while out and about a quarter. don't put your home and symbol us on display. oh, the social stays, each nice. all right, so you guys don't talk to strangers. i. 7 avoid noisy gatherings with what she can do. i get him in the marashi eaten your colleagues and perhaps also your friends, since you're guilty because you'll russian much now the bomb. so what can i do was my, i'm sick leave, so i'd be glad to with bbt a by mutual be i'm like conceptually body specific story short with

a with hello and welcome to cross out. were all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle for some reason, a number of so called european intellectuals and politicians maintain the e. u represents the highest level of human development we're told europe is a garden and the rest of us live in the jungle. rhetoric aside, europe is in serious trouble. hardly a model for the rest of the world. in fact, europe is declining into irrelevance. ah, with cross stocking europe, the client, i'm joined by my guest, john laughlin and paris. he's

a university lecture in history and political philosophy in munich. we have brow niemeyer. he is the chairman of the council for constitution and 20 and in providence we have vladimir goldstein. he is the chair of the department of slavic studies at brown university car, a gentleman cross stock rules and the fact that means he can jump in in time. he won, and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you 1st. he been on this program probably for it since its inception. i know you're a straight talker. you don't mean to words. i'm not gonna means my words with my question. does europe within the context of the e u when it's current political elite have a death wish? oh, that's a good question. i think in some ways, yes, i mean obviously what you're referring to in your question is the extraordinary way in which european leaders have taken orders from the americans. and it's very important to understand that they did take orders from the americans. i'm particularly of course, thinking of the closure of the not stream to pipeline. i'm not talking about the sabotage at this point. i'm talking about the closure back in february. and what's remarkable is the way they take orders.