ah ah, a ah quest of officials blame russia for the deadly incidents in easton, poland, despite methink ukrainian myths all at once, lightly respond with poland make you turn on the incident that killed 2 people near the border with ukraine, as also admits the method. apparently came from key of the defense business was not launched by russia as early as suggested with, if not the south african leader who was on the g 20 group to accept more countries from the continent into their rank as africans pushed for

a bigger role in geo politics with hello and welcome. it's 10 pm here in the russian capital, and this is our t international with the very latest world news update is good to have you with us . now, while the investigation into the polish missile incident is still ongoing, washington has already pens the blame on moscow regardless of the probes results by the fact that several western officials have admitted that the ukrainian ad defends me, thought was the likely cause of the event. they killed 2 people in eastern poland. whatever the final conclusions may be, it is clear that the party ultimately responsible for this tragic incident is russia, which launched a barrage of missiles on ukraine, specifically intended to target civilian infrastructure. ukraine had and has every

right to defend itself. let's get up to speed on the latest details now from our new york correspondence. caleb more pin. caleb. good to see you. so even off the several western officials admitted it was probably a ukrainian mess. all that long been poland, still blaming russia. why is that? well, it's quite interesting. so we now have us present, joe, by nato general secretary stoughton berg. and on top of that, the polish president himself, admitting that the missile was most likely a ukrainian air defense missile. it was not a missile fired by russia. russia did not launch this attack this attack. and this piece of weaponry did not originate from russia. however, they argue that somehow this is still russia's fault. they argue that because the conflict is taking place, because because russia has engaged in air strikes, this is still somehow russia's fault,

even though russia is not to blame for their russia did not launch this. this is not a piece of russian military hardware. here is what we heard from the nato. she basically admitting that what russia, that, in the immediate aftermath of the black was true, that this was not a russian action. here's what he said. no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and we have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against nato. the incident was likely caused by a ukrainian air defense. nissan. fired to defend ukrainian territory against russia. cruz me saw attacks. but let me be clear. this is not ukraine's fault. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility, and it continues it's illegal war against ukraine. now these

words we heard from the nato chief acco, what was said by the german chancellor. he had similar conclusions based on the evidence he was presented with. here's what we heard from the german later guns class. just one thing is clear, no matter who's rocket it was. and for whatever reason, it fell in poland. this would not have happened if russia had not started a war against ukraine. now what's interesting am, is that even though ukraine has admitted that they did launch an air defense missile, they still insist this is not their doing, even though we have joe biden. and the nato chief and the german chancellor and the white house all confirming that this was indeed a ukrainian missile. the ukrainian forces and the ukrainian government still maintains that that's not the case that this somehow was russia's doing. they are

sticking with their original story that has been thoroughly debunked, even by their nato allies. and here's what we've heard from ukrainian officials sticking with their original story, widely dis, acted and disprove young. i mean, assume you live. i have no doubt about the reports from the commander of the air force. and commander in chief solution is that it was not on missile and not a missile strike. yeah, and i have no reason not to trust them because i've been through this whole war with them. so this is an interesting case study, but events that have gone on, we have a situation where a missile takes place. an attack happened, there's a hit, people die, and immediately, all over social media, russia is being blamed for it. russia comes forward and presents the truth. meanwhile, western officials look into evidence, etc. and it comes to the forefront that russia was telling the truth the entire

time. russia was being completely up ranking on it. this was not their missile, this was a ukrainian missile that was unloaded. and even western leaders are now confirming that russia was completely upfront and honest with the world the entire time. however, we have ukrainian officials still sticking with their original version of the that even though western leaders are buying it, ukrainian officials still and said that somehow dismissal that the world is acknowledging, came from. the grand forces was a grainy and weapon. somehow it is russia's doing so, it seems like this is an important moment to pay attention to how quickly western media and social media goes into an anti rush and spin, and how quickly the deceptive claim can be disarmed and how certain forces will stick with disproven claims no matter what, as long as it fits there, and he, russian, narrative, keller many thanks for the data thought is caleb moore. mean,

while the polish president has made a u. turn on the crisis after initially blaming moscow. president dude on now says he has no evidence that the missile was launched by the russian military. he also admitted that ukraine's defenses were likely responsible. most likely. it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was a missile fired by the russian side, much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland. journalist on political analysts, john thoroughly saved the west, is likely to turn a blind eye to ukraine's involvement in the missile crisis crated the native protector. of course, they have called blinds to do whatever they want. any outrage provocation is acceptable for nato. any ukranian publications, this is a war of nerves propaganda. war of the site sy, up the idea is to,

under russia under moscow. and, you know, ukraine, the de facto protectorate of nato, of the usa. so they can of course, do whatever they want and it will be forgiven. it will be it'll be ignored. for example, incident like this. ok, so they, so you brain kill 2 people said no big deal of russia did it. we're going to vote article 5. let's start world war 3. you're dealing with extremely unhinge irresponsible people in washington in london and brought them with you crying. anything is possible because they are trying to drag. you may go into the conflict into their conflict, right? with russia, they are trying to do that. so i think it's quite probable. also, maybe there was an accident. they were trying to shoot down a russian missile. but chances are, this is a deliberate effort to provoke nato to invoke article 5 into tac, russia possible. the un security council is due to me shortly to discuss the

missing crisis group and you live coverage of the events later in the program. so to stay with us on asi international for that. now, in other developments, the u. s. a secretary of homeland security phase americans shouldn't worry about a possible nuclear escalation in ukraine as any such destination in europe wouldn't reach the u. s. anyway. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . meanwhile, donald trump is announced, he will run for president again in 2024 as acute the global community of i've been looking the nuclear threat to renew deal. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately, or never even discussed as

a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot. belgrade bass, professor stephen guy edge says that an atmosphere, the global power noise of the situation in ukraine is creating a wheel nuclear threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent and the people get used to it. i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistics, literally. but because, because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoia is so high that certain events can be misreads by the other side. and then, you know, things can go out of course,

just because of a series of mistakes. and i think that we are in a really grave, a situation of a possible aah, global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes off or we are done with the imminent threat. meanwhile, a k meeting between the chinese and british leaders on the sidelines of the g. 20. it has been scuppered by the overnight incident in poland, where she soon that was expected to face president. she jim, paying for their 1st ever meeting, which would be the 1st face to face talks between a chinese and purchased leader in 5 years, with many issues on the table to be discussed. but slowly ahead of the scheduled discussion soon, i took off to attend an urgent meeting with britain's g 7 and nato partners. instead, journalist martin j, they do not is not really an independent leader as he still answers to washington

when it comes to foreign policy. well, i'm disappointed, but no insight is surprised. i was actually taking a step in the right direction as being pragmatic spangler, we should talk, but some, he's such a poodle of the american. so it's actually very difficult to take him seriously. in any respect he today, he just referred to the americans who said, well, you know, if you look at american foreign policy and what they're doing and we very much aligned to the, you know, huge disappointing. you know, that we've become such of such a poodle. you know, with, with the americans, we don't even have a foreign policy anymore. so it's very difficult to imagine what those 2 would discuss when we have seen in recent, most is a massive shift on the global self. countries who don't necessarily agree with boots in position in ukraine, but she are sick and tired of her. it's being slowed down the throats of america from london and so on. and so have moved over towards this new emerging eastern blog, which is not a name yet. you know, bricks has got new members,

right across the world, signing up, wanted to join it to the ceo as well as china corporation. and so, you know, things that shift and this affects relationships very much. if breton can't really understand and predicts where it stands next 5 or 10 years in the shifting ground, there's not really gonna have much position to towards the chinese on any level. so build politics. those play a big role. international grain shipman, sand escalating global hunger were among the main topics to the g 20 summit, which is wrapped up in barley marshes. foreign minister agreed that moscow is interested in an extension of the grain deal allowing russian and ukrainian wheat and fertilizers to be exported through the black sea. but only if the supplies actually go to the countries that need in the most of the sidelines of the summit, we spoke to the russian minister of finance about the grain and energy crises. and he says that rushes activity at the summit proves that the west has failed to isolate moscow. legislated messenger. yes,

indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relate to the russian federation, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization you asking about continuing the grain deal. it's true that many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal because we all see the situation with hunger and the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain food to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal and the source of communication with colleagues, sir. j love rav. speaking of the summit of leaders said that russia is for the continuation of the deal, but only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries and countries with a european economy. as is happening now, therefore, we spoke in favor of continuing the deal under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need

to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions hit them since they lead to price increases. and such increases hinder the growth of the economy and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources. removing all barriers that prevent us from exporting our energy resources to other countries. and today, there are many barriers, this homes, the world economy, and the g 20 itself was it was considered the issue with the world economy and its dynamics. all of this was stressed by the russian delegation, and i think that the western countries heard this on behalf of our anti delegation . i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes, in the speeches of an individual western countries joining the events of the g 20. there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and culture, rush at the end at special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is

a significant part of the world economy. a not a single issue can be resolved without us. versus your answers. the african union, which includes $55.00 countries that should become a permanent member of the g 20. as according to the south african president, to say the global food and to energy crises may only be solved with the continence help. we call for continued g 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms. in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and energy and security across our world. africa's issues as being one of the main topics at this. he has g 20 summit as the continent face is increasing hunger. china's president is also back to the idea of inviting more african countries to join the international group. that is 23 percent. china supports the african union

succession to the g 20. the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account. professor anthony van at new kirk say, it's crucial for african countries to play a big a role in organizations like the g 20. the g 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance their own prospects in the global economy and local governance. by the way, there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important. i think for africa than the g. 20, many of the problems in africa relating to peace, security, conflict, instability, but a source exploitation are caused by colonial, any period behavior by exploitation, by external actors. and so many of the problems that africa faces are not caused by africa itself, although we can't escape some blame of course. but nevertheless, some of the big issues, for example, you know,

when well and gas when actually sources are discovered, their former colonial masters are quick to, to jump into africa with promises of development, aid and support. and a seat at the table of important decision making machinery and instruments back. we know what the agenda is are, which is why my view. it is important for the f, for africa as it is presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the g 20 to protect its interests and enhance its own stature. but at the same time, can it cannot be the only in international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the west, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. bricks i think is really important and might become even more important in this global term will that we are going through and some even speak of a revival of the non in line movement, maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa has different options to choose from,

and it must be very careful who it makes alliances. but as we faced this turbulent time globally, may be ongoing trade war between the u. s. and china, the world banks managing directors, the 2 countries, is, shouldn't dominate discussions on subsidies or restrictions for other countries. we have to manage it in a way that builds trust and provides predictability. otherwise, they can lead to higher costs and who pays for higher costs? consumers and developing countries who can be shut out of these global value chains . the world bank of essays, subsidies and trade restrictions that should be applied hand in hand with the world trade organization, which has its own means of ensuring market security. this comes off the us trade representative katherine ties said washington's a misty, prevent paging from using so called non market policies. i think that is part and parcel with the non economic practice and concerns and we will continue to work on

those issues. well, let's discuss this with you on a list. actually, my tansy ass in a good to see you now despite the fact the washington has essentially led and he cannot make war against aging. for years, the u. s. remains a key trade partner of china. so what do you think washington's really trying to achieve? well, who is this managing director of the world bank? you don't have to be john perkins, whose book, economic man, confessions of ego, again showed how that institution with the i m. f has done so much to torture and commiserate hundreds of millions of people across the developing world for so long to get to know a bit about her. i mean, she gave that interview just play the clip from from the tv channel of bloomberg. i think there's one the 1st channels to say that the survey lever of the russian foreign minister had been hospitalized in bali, complete a complete lie. but if you just look at it twitter time when she's talking about

over the, in the global south and then retweet something, obviously, from her sister organization, the i m f for as many people in the global south. convinced i is a sort of global torturer, the i m f being the bad go up to the world bank so called good cop. she tweets priyah by sue, who is a, i think in barley of the g 20 talking about i wonderful janet yellen is the black rock vassal federal reserve member. even elizabeth warren didn't think much of her support for that. and she was the one in 2017, he said there wouldn't be a economy crisis. so it's very difficult from that interview to take the, the managing director of the world bank seriously, especially when of course, bricks and s c o r. you know, that they're coming fast on the tracks of both as institutions after the chinese trade partners they, they're being affected by the american restrictions on beijing's international trade. what do you make of that?

i mean, the idea that there are impartial observers at the will trade organization, the managing director of the world bank, the i m f. m. the idea that these institutions, which clearly, as a matter of policy, are opposed by a large suede to the global south fee chinese communist party and so forth. i mean, you know, about time that some of these local vessel states realize they are not their friends, they're not a friend to those that are angry and miserable and they're starving millions. so it's about time they do speak up for those people. but of course, many of those politicians who are speaking up just a little are themselves enslaved by the new liberal forces that washington has unleashed. so we'll see how fierce they, they actually are as your previous interview. we, they're, one of them were saying it from africa. it'll take a bit bit more time. i suppose the ukraine crisis may have sped it up

a little. and with the chinese economy booming in recent years, how do you think beijing could avoid a slow down of its financial progress in the face of these american restrictions? here you say booming, but if you read the western nature synagogue of repressed, they'll tell you all the time. i remember being here in, in dubai 22 years ago being told in foreign affairs magazine, the china will never be a powerful country at all. i don't think china is worrying too much about any of this. and you know, none of the bricks, country leaderships are, they seem very excited indeed. i'm coming to you from, from do by. i was at a conference here and organized by ross called rest, moderating it in the you a help minutes to was saying, we've got to have close collaboration, business cooperation in healthcare, for instance, with russia. and that's not a guided thing. you're going to hear in the european union, it is in the global south, which opposes everything. arguably, the world bank,

p i m f, and increasingly w stanfull option, you could potentially replace the u. s. as a strategic trade partner for china in the future. well, i mean, i would say in that could it, could it be giant? i mean, china goes famously says they want a multi polar world. and clearly as far as london, frankfurt, paris, washington, they obviously confused, multi polar from manic, depressive, or bipolar. my hope i'm making a joke too much about mental health, but think of all the mental health ruined by a u. s. a gemini, all these years are china clearly saying they don't want to be the you need power in this world. they want a multi polar world with different countries pursuing different things and being allowed to without being slaughtered or mass by the u. s. and european military industrial complex, i'll say may thanks for joining us on a program with

a speaking teacher analyst. ashley mckenzie. thank you. person half an hour. this military mission will withdraw from mali ahead of schedule. the african countries ruling john says now turn to the russian private power military volcanic group to help fight against islamist insurgence. according to a u. k. government minister, the troops with opposed to remain in marty for 3 years, but would now be pulled out over the next 6 months. around 300 british soldiers were sent to the country and 2020 to protect flow tools from islamist militants. as part of the un mission, however, the crisis has recently escalated. the ruling, johnson has begun working with russia and agree, and response from author withdrew from molly and its decades long presents in the african country. meanwhile, the leaders of molly on the kena foster held 2 meetings aimed at tightening cooperation in the fight against terrorism. a local journalists centers this report

. so he says visit abra booking part. so come jelly bram tawana has chosen by my going to pay a visit to your is the army for us to be great. that makes sense. so most of the women a week later let me self defense of money. i've the head of a high level delegation. was that what that do? what a meeting with colleague of looking at possible security is that come on issue between the 2 countries. there is a need for poison between the 2 armies, including the choice to be made. the choice of burglar showed you, but i told a follow him up also. and molly are sharing the same border, 1200 kilometer. if please wait till the group actually 3 bought us and much countries to put the

pressure on those who was n lee. we'll see what that was. we also spoke to some local citizens who shed their assessment of a long running and controversial french involvement. molly? oh, paris shouldn't interfere with what we are doing here. what's burkina faso belongs to us? paris has no say in deciding its future. my luggage, paris is war it as it can lose a colony like the wants it sees in balkan afar. so in molly, we are confident that russia can solve our problem with equipped and they half we believe that they can help us fight terrorism in. we are not satisfied with the situation in book enough fossil, we can understand what is happening in there. we also do understand why we keep oneself and defeats we support of such will equipped militarist and the frenchman. political analyst, maddie, abraham conte says the european military emissions and molly have failed to yield

any positive results for locals. if we look at it all for you to come in and money and you know, i thought if you didn't get to any activity or the pollution or from the government that in especially in my i don't think so. any more money will be impacted on, on the situation even if they decide to leave off concrete, are you sure now for us now we'd be happy. it will be, it will be never, they know we are great, but they know because now they changed any country once a week with africa, with africa, from fif month to be. we must to be like one of the physical

level ation not on dependent idea. new political in africa, i think this is for the country, open country canada, but i don't think so if it, if they did, they wanted it on with well, joe biden can't seem to get his hands on russia's military muscle. he managed to get up close and personal with some real rush and muscle instead, as he happily jumped on the chance to group a bulky camera man's biceps on the sidelines of the g. 20 summit, his biceps or bridges my caps with. oh no sir. there's a man, i hope we're on the same side. you know, so he's russian. i don't care who you ha, ha, he's got some real biceps that we call them guns, with training. the camera man who works for russia's tv, china, one a said he didn't expect such praise from joe biden on the manual mcclung. you re,

so mom who plays hockey and enjoys working outside, he's happy, his muscles didn't disappoint. the american president noticed me. he walked right up to me, which i didn't even expect. so i started backing away. he started talking about how big my arms were, and then he touched my biceps. while we've got that story fully fleshed out on our website, our t dot com online all the time with plenty of, of the news, opinions and analysis of some of the world's biggest events. first, the ones the mainstream media isn't telling you about may thanks for joining us, a on our t international that. so for me, but mariah will be here at the top of the out with the latest. ah, for some reason, a number of so called european intellectuals and politicians maintain the he, you represents the highest level of human development. we were told europe is a garden and the rest of us live.