ah, a incident, it was a deliberate provocation by ukraine and poland to britain it into the conflicts of the you turned on the incident that killed 2 people near the border with ukraine as well. so admitted cement, apparently came for thieves and defences, and was not launch by russia, as a suggested with

the south africa needed close on the g. 23rd world countries from the continent into their ranks as africans push for a bigger role in g, appellate 6. with hello i well the national broke off in a live a from last year. it just pops the out. i'm happy that you joined us. i'm where i'd come mommy a little the top. so this out poland has decided not to invoke a provision of native child to inquire into the missile incident. the un security council gathered on thursday to discuss the situation according to russian. you,

ambassador, miss allison was a deliberate provocation by in queen anne poland, to benito into the conflicts. jesse, but he was this meeting had not been scheduled. we would have had to convene it anyway to discuss the attempts by ukraine and poland to provoke a direct clash between russia and nato. it was not just an intentional attempt at this information, but a conscious attempt to bring nato, which is currently conducting a proxy war, into a direct conflict with our country. this wasn't alive mouth of his porcelain caleb, both over the latest details of it. sure will the un security council meeting was conducted and we heard from various countries and we heard the leaders of countries align with united states very carefully trying to shift the conversation away from this missile strike incident is missile hit ah, because it appears every bit of evidence is coming forward to indicate that russia

was right from the beginning. this was not a attack by a russian missile. this was an attack by ukrainian forces. this is a ukrainian missile that was shot by ukrainian forces. and we've now had the leaders of nato and the leaders of various western countries. admitting that this c hit did not come from russia. this is what we've heard. we have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and we have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the incident will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense me, san fired to the fens, ukrainian territory against russian cruise missile attacks. but let me be clear,

this is not ukraine's fault. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility. ah, it continues. it's illegal. war against ukraine comes class. one thing is clear, no matter whose rocket it was, and for whatever reason it fell in poland. this would not have happened if russia had not started a war against ukraine. and that seems to be the line of argument that is now being gone with by western leaders. they're trying to change the conversation and say, sure, this wasn't a missile from russia. but this strike took place in the context of a war that they then blame on russia. so in a roundabout way, they're trying to argue that somehow the incident in which 2 folks in poland died. this incident is somehow russia's falls. now, it's important to note that while the world is looking on and looking at the evidence presented by russia and the photo graphs and, and other images of,

of the strike, seeing this isn't as 300 missile that is used by ukraine for air defense. it is not a weapon used by russia. i'm the ukrainians are sticking with their store. they are insisting, despite all the evidence that has surfaced that somehow it is russia that is responsible for this he had in poland. maintenance realize i have no doubt about the reports from the commander of the air force and commander in chief resolutions that it was not a missile and not a missile strike. and i have no reason not to trust them because i've been through this whole war with them. now when the russian ambassador of bens, it's up to the floor of the un security council meeting, he pointed out how dangerous this provocative act was. that if article 5 were article 4 had been invoked, this could have led to a much bigger confrontation. nato countries would have gotten into a direct conflict with russia, and that would be a very, very serious situation. furthermore,

the russian ambassador pointed out that now in the aftermath of this event, we have the ukranian government banning any of its citizens from posting on social media, the images of missile heads or missiles strikes. and that raises the question. is this done to make sure that actual evidence and actual, you know, photographs of what goes on in the future, can't be used to debunk allegations or incidents that are blamed on russia. now, the russian representative also pointed out that a number of the weapons that have been given by the united states to ukraine and up directly in the hands of terrorists are being sold on the black market. he pointed out that russia has presented to the un all kinds of evidence of her rendez, atrocities being committed by ukraine forces. but the western countries seem to have no interest in it. and western media seems to ignore those reports. and it was very clear as the meeting wrapped up, that there were very big differences between major countries and how they regard

today's incident. i was amusing to watch the western countries back away and tried to change the conversation away from the allegations that were being leveled against russia just hours before. now ukraine is still sticking with its story that somehow this was not, they are mis. all this was somehow rushes rushes doing, but it seems like the rest of the world, including most of the major nato countries, is realizing, based on the very solid evidence presented by russia and others, that this was not russia's doing. russia is not responsible for that strike in poland because he's kind of building that have always good to talk to. my experience obviously likes white so old that i spoke to him earlier. he's the host of the conservative dandy of cause. and he says at the west reaction to the incident, expose his weakness and its leadership. they already had created

a narrative and they didn't want to go back on that narrative. so instead of actually going back in the narrative, they said was, if russia wasn't in a place of aggression against ukraine than ukraine never would have fired the rocket that killed 2 people in poland. so it says kind of the circular ability for them to again spin truth into something that's or spin that it's been a lie to something that they create as the of the truth of the day. it shows the absurdity and the weakness of the people that are in leadership. there, there is a global est agenda. you have election systems across, across the world that are being influenced or you know, we're election stolen. so they're, they're selecting these people to be in these positions so they can be controlled by someone above them. know who that person above them is. i don't know. and i think that russia has never played by those rules. they've always played by having their own of sovereignty and own autonomy and have you know, largely spoken the truth. you have to respect the apparatus when the apparatus is

telling the truth and doing things that are necessary and that's what i see, the rushes done. and other developments the u. s. sanitary of homeland security says americans shouldn't worry about possible nuclear escalation. you going as any such destination in europe wouldn't reach the us anyway. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . meanwhile, donald psalm who's announced he will run the prison again in 2024 has excused a global community of overlooking the nuclear threats degree new deal. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately, or never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over

the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot belgrade bass. professor stefan, got dick says that an atmosphere of global paranoia pollution situation. ukraine is treating a real nucleus, but it seems to me that we live now are in an era where a nuclear threat is imminent and people got used to it. i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to to, to go ballistic fully thoroughly. but because it, because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoia is so high that certain events can be mis read by the other side. and then, you know, things can go go out of course,

just because of a series of mistakes and i think that we are in a really grave a situation of a possible aah, global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes after we're done with the imminent threat. meanwhile, the but it has to you to and the crisis often issue blaming off the president. do the now says he has no evidence that the missile was lost by the russian ministry. he has also admitted the trains and defences will likely responsible. most likely, it was a russian made as 300 missile at the moment. we have no evidence that it was a missile fired by the russian side. much indicates that it was an air defense missile, which unfortunately fell on the territory of poland. just an political alice,

john bery, says the word is locked in front of blind eye and c claims in bowman, and then a. so costs created the native protector. of course, they have blinds to do whatever they want. any outrage, provocation is acceptable for nato. any ukranian publications, this is a war of nerves, if the propaganda war of the site sign up, the idea is to, under russia under moscow, as you know, ukraine, the de facto protectorate of nato, of the usa. so they can, of course, do whatever they want. and it will be forgiven, it will be it'll be ignored. for example, incident like this. ok, so they, so you brain kill to always be no big deal of russia did it. we're going to invoke article 5. let's start world war 3. you're dealing with extremely unhinge

irresponsible people in washington in london and then brought them with you crying . anything is possible because they are trying to drag. you may go into the conflict in their conflict right. with russia, they are trying to do that. so i think it's quite probable. also, maybe there was an accident. they were trying to shoot down a russian missile. but chances are, this is a deliberate effort to provoke nato to invoke article 5 and to tack russia possible . meanwhile, a key means imaging that the chinese and british leaders in the side line of the g 20 has been scuppered by the overnight incident in poland. richey soon i was excited to face present easing pain for the 1st ever meeting, which would be the 1st face to face talks between a chinese average the, the in 5 years with many issues on the table shortly ahead of the schedule, the discussion. so that took off to attend an urgent meeting with brittany g 7 and

nato partners instead. jonas martin j says some is not really and independently that he still office of washington when it comes to foreign policy. disappointed, but not entirely surprised. it was actually taking a step in the right direction is being pragmatic spangler, we should talk, but some, he's such a poodle of the americans, that it's actually very difficult to take him seriously. in any respect he today, he just referred to the americans. he said, when, you know, if you look at american foreign policy and what the americans of doing it with her much aligned to that. you know, it's hugely disappointing. you know, that we've become such a pathetic poodle in our, with, with the americans. we don't even ever a foreign policy anymore. so it's very difficult to imagine what those 2 would discuss. we have seen in recent months is a massive shift on the global self countries who don't necessarily agree with putin so position in ukraine, but actually are sick and tired of the gemini that's being forced on the throats

from america and from london and so on. and so have moved over towards this new emerging eastern block, which i think her name yet, you know, and bricks has got new members are right across the world. signing up, wanted to join it to look at the seo as well as south shawnee corporation. and so, you know, when things a shift and this affects relationships very much in a if, if britain can't really understand and predicts where it stands in the next 5 or 10 years in the shifting ground, there's not really gonna have much position to talk to the chinese, on any level, so g, about build politics. play a big role. angela glen shipments and escalating global hung though were among the main topics of the g 20 summit, which has wrapped up in barley. brothers for a man agreed that martha is interested in an extension of the great deal alone with russia and ukraine in week and further the eggs was through the vac. see,

but only if supplies at figure the country that need them the most on the fly, the, the summit to leave both the russian matter of finance, but the grain and energy prices. he said the russian activity of the some improves the worse of failed to isolate moscow. legislator no, no symptom. yes indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit. the directly relate to the russian federation, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization you asking about continuing the grain deal with to that many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal because we all see the situation with hunger in the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain food to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal, and the source of communication with colleagues says a love, rob, speaking of the summit of leaders, said that russia is for the continuation of the deal, only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to

countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries and countries with the european economy as is happening now. therefore, we spoke in favor of continuing the deal under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions hit them since they lead to price increases and such increases in the, the growth of the economy and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources. removing all barriers that prevent us um, exporting our energy resources to other countries. and to day there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy. and the g 20 itself was it was considered the issue with the world economy and its dynamics. all this was stressed by the russian delegation and i think that the western countries heard this on behalf of our anti delegation. i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes. in the speeches of individual

western countries joining the events of the g 20. there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and culture rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy and not a single issue can be resolved without us versus europe. this is sonya, you represent the african union, which in 5th 55 countries should become a permanent member. the gene 20. that so claudie to the south african present, who says the global food i'm and as utilizes, can only result with the continents. hope we call for continued g 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms. in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and

energy and security across our world. however, this is i have the in one of the main topics that this he is g 20 summit out of the continent faces increasing hunger. dr. present has also brought the idea of inviting waffling countries to doing the international group total my roof area. china's supports the african union succession to the g 20. the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account a versa. and tony violet and new kirk says is crucial for african countries to play a bigger role in organizations like legit 20 the g 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance their own prospects in the global economy. and in global governance, by the way, there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important, i think, for africa then the g. 20 many of the problems in africa relating to peace,

security, conflict, instability, resort exploitation are caused by colonial and imperial behavior by exploitation, by external actors. and so many of the problems that africa faces are not caused by africa itself, although we can't escape some blame of course. but nevertheless, some of the big issues. for example, you know, when orland gas when actually sources are discovered, then the former colonial mosque was quick to, to, to jump into africa with promises of development, 8 and support and a seat at the table, all important decision making machinery and instruments back. we know what the agenda are, which is why my view. it is important for the, for africa entity presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the g 20 to protect it interests and enhance its own stature. but at the same time,

it cannot be the only international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the way, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. bricks i think is really important and might become even more important in the global term will that we are going through and some even speak of a viable of the non in line movement, maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa has different options to choose from and as must be very careful who it makes, aligns as best as we face this turbulent time globally. ah, germany says is increasingly concerned about is national security physically when it comes to fighting this information. the country's interior minister mention some foreign threats as she outlined, a massive security strategy make over our external and internal security are closely into bound and attack strong domestic politics to ensure security and,

and for our country. if for in states want to deploy just to sorry, cheapest disinclination campaigns, the domestic politics must react versus each curve those days off the jeremy 2nd largest channel, the d f. publish a documentary about archie and some other russian hours. first event, despite an ongoing by and many europeans are still using the piazza chin in our coverage of thought to some russian propaganda. machine keeps going and probably won't let the use of it russia to dave audio and push it today was banned in march . if you look at the history of search queries in google, because we will see attempts to bypass this block in the west as well. for example, using a vpn this to access russia. today i was get the job i live in city odyssey. in reference to the head of our teeth, german, i was charl says the df should very well be wary of our on the answer is he which

the e. u is unlikely to be able to stop human rights lawyer martin. those are says that the europeans respect the freedom of speech and turn to media coverage then to try off some extra us in germany like into that as well. to blend out to cut out different opinions. we had already some people who lost their jobs because they were bringing with bringing forward the nations for peace. some people are clinging to the mainstream media, which all tell the same narrative, but other people don't believe it because they see that it's 21 sided. and so they try to get access to different use to news from all the most important. let's say the synagogue conflict and the moment is the conflict and the ukraine and

that european union and the german government decided to have a wall sided stance on the side of the ukrainian government, which is as well supported by fascist and in this wall. and we have a saying in germany in wal truce is the 1st who dies. so in this situation, who is an attempt to blend out to cut all the information from the so called enemy? i think this attempt is stupid because we in central europe, we should have an idea to bring for the diplomatic solution for the conflict. and we want that we should listen to everyone that is low and in the broadcast. like in the top right. well that this is

our check out of the dot com for more national and international is moving back at the top of the hour. so we hope you'll join us with ah, ah ah

ah ah ah, no one else showed seemed wrong. when all 3 just don't move and you will have to sheep out these days because the advocate an engagement, it was betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground.

ah, ah ah, ah. hello and welcome to cross out. were all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle for some reason. a number of so called european intellectuals and politicians maintain the e. you represents the highest level of human development. we are told europe is a garden and the rest of us lived in the jungle rhetoric aside, europe is in serious trouble, hardly a model for the rest of the world. in fact,

europe is declining into irrelevance. ah, crossing europe, the client, i'm joined by my guest, john laughlin in paris. he is a university lecture in history and political philosophy in munich. we have brow niemeyer. he is the chairman of the council for a constitution in sovereignty and in providence we have vladimir goldstein. he is the chair of the department of slavic studies at brown university. are a gentleman, cross stock rules, and the fact that means you can jump any time you want. and i always appreciate, john, let me go to you 1st. you've been on this program probably for since it's inception, i know you're a straight talker. you don't mean to words, i'm not going to means my words with my question. does europe within the context of the e u when it's current political elite have a death wish? ah, that's a good question. i think in some ways, yes, i mean obviously what you're referring to in your question is the extraordinary way in which european leaders have taken orders from the americans. and it's very

important to understand that they did take orders from the americans. i'm particularly of course, thinking of the closure of the not stream to pipeline. i'm not talking about the sabotage at this point. i'm talking about the closure back in february. or what's remarkable is the way they take orders, and yet they are the ones of course, who suffer from these orders. i mean, we've seen this now for, for months since the ukraine war started, or the americans in a way, one the war on day one. because the not stream to gas pipeline was closed down and her once it was closed down again, leaving aside the question of the later sabotaged. it was obviously always going to be very difficult for it to be opened up again. so indeed, one wonders whether they have a death wish because they doing things all their order to do stuff by other people which are not in their own interests. and i have to say that the death, which i think in my view, are manifest itself most obviously in green policy,

so called green policy, which of course involves a negative growth, negative economic growth. a reduction in economic activity. obviously a reduction in energy consumption reduction in a travel and all kinds of all the sort of other things that we've got used to in recent decades. and increasingly what we see, for example, very recently in the last day or so in france and in finland and in other countries . now the idea of a carbon no permits which will track your carbon emissions. you know, every time you go and buy a pint of milk, you will la, you know, you'll be told how much carbon that costs and the logical consequence of course, of this i in these kinds of ideas even if they're presented as voluntary at 1st, is rationing and socialism on central control and in other words, exactly where are the soviet union was right.