a, a with was not just an intentional attempt at this information, but a conscious attempt to bring me to, which is currently conducting a proxy war, into a direct conflict with our country. russia, the master to the un slammed allegations of moscow involvement and the pool and missile incident as anti russian hysteria. adding the accusations could have led to a dangerous escalation that as the western powers admit, the fallen mental apparently came from ukraine, yet still insist the missile was not one of his own going against the statements of its allies. plus the south african liter calls on the g,

2000 and group to accept more countries from the continent into their ranks as africa pushes for a bigger role. and you politics with, from month down to the world. this is our t international. i'm rachel blevins here. with the top stories of the our welcome to the program, poland has decided not to invoke a provision of nato's charter for an inquiry into the missile incident. the un security council convened to discuss the situation according to russia un ambassador. the missile incident was a deliberate provocation by ukraine in poland to bring nato into the conflict. just we believe this meeting had not been scheduled. we would have had to convenient anyway to discuss the attempts by ukraine and poland rhodes to provoke a direct clash between russia and nato. but it was not just an intentional attempt

of this information, but a conscious attempt to bring natal, which is currently conducting a proxy war, into a direct conflict with our country. at the meeting, we heard russia present evidence regarding the deadly incident in poland. and russia came forward and pointed out that these allegations that were leveled at russia in the aftermath of the incident, diesel allegations led to a very dangerous escalation. it appeared. this was an attempt to draw nato countries in the conflict in ukraine, which is quite serious, and russia presented evidence. we did hear from different countries that spoke. they continued to criticize russia, but they did not focus on the incident. they didn't repeat some of the heavy allegations that were escalating things within the previous the previous day, previous 24 hours. it seems like they are moving away from trying to blame russia for the deadly incident. but it was pretty clear that western leaders did very much

want to keep the focus on demonizing, russia. we've heard from the nato chief stoughton burger from the german chancellor . they do admit that this missile, it appears to have been of ukrainian origin. and that the deadly incident that took place was not the direct responsibility of russia. however, they continue to argue in kind of a convoluted way, because the conflict itself is one that they blame on russia, that the incident is, therefore, russia's fault. here's some of what we've heard to have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and you have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the incident will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense mi sign, fired to the fens ukrainian territory against russian cruise missile attacks.

but let me be claire. this is not ukraine's fault. rashaw bears ultimate responsibility asked if continuous it's illegal, war against ukraine comes claw is. one thing is clear, no matter who's rocket it was, and for whatever reason, it fell in poland. this would not have happened if russia had not started a war against ukraine. now this is slightly different than what we've heard from zalinski and the ukraine government. despite all of the weapons and support that's been given to kiya, it appears that they trust their own generals more than they trust the western countries and their own investigations are the words. ringback we're hearing from ukraine. officials seem to indicate that they still blame russia were the deadly incident. here's what we've heard this from you live. i have no doubt about the reports from the commander of the air force and commander in chief zone lose knew

that it was not a missile and not a missile strike. yeah, and i have no reason not to trust them because i've been through this whole war with them. well, this is quite interesting. we see zalinski basically saying that the dutch prime minister, the white house, the pentagon, the nato chief, the german chancellor. all of them are not correct. he seems to be insisting that somehow this is russia's fall, this is russia's doing. and it reminds us of what was said before, the un security council by ambassador benzine. when he spoke for the council, you said this was some kind of provocation, intended to draw nato directly into the conflict and watching the ukrainian leaders stick to it. despite back that western leaders who have been quite quite generous in giving quite a bit of weapons and support to the key of government. the fact that now we have the government here insisting that no. busy they are wrong that this could not have been an air defense message from, from ukrainian forces. the fact that we're hearing that seems to indicate there may

be a sign of the key of government kind of thumbing. it's no at the nato countries that have given them so much military support. over the last few months, journalist and political analysts, john verola, says that the west is likely to turn a blind di, ukraine's involvement in the missile incident created the native protector. of course, they have called blinds to do whatever they want. any outrage provocation is acceptable for nato. any ukrainian provocation. this is a war of nerves. it's the propaganda war of the site. sy, up, the idea is to, under russia under moscow, as you know, ukraine, the de facto protectorate of nato, of the usa. so they can, of course, do whatever they want and it will be forgiven. it'll be, it'll be ignored. for example, incident like that. ok, so they,

so you brain killed 2 people that said no big deal, but of russia did it. we're going to vote article 5. let's start world war 3. you're dealing with extremely on hand, irresponsible people in washington in london, and then brought them with you crying. anything is possible because they are trying to drag. you may go into the conflict into their confidence. right? when russia they are trying to do that. so i think it's quite probable. also, maybe there was an accident. they were trying to shoot down a russian missile. but chances are, this is a deliberate effort to provoke nato to invoke article 5 and through tac, russia possible. and other developments, the us secretary of homeland security says that americans shouldn't worry about a possible nuclear escalation. ukraine, as any potential fall out, would not affect the us. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest. we do not anticipate that

a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . meanwhile, donald trump is announced. he will run for president again in 2024. has accused the global community of overlooking a growing nuclear threat to renew deals. and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet, nuclear weapons, which would destroy the world immediately are never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine? they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot. gallagher advanced professor stephen guy. it says that an atmosphere of global paranoia over the situation ukraine is creating a real nuclear threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where

a nuclear threat is imminent and people got used to it. i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistics, literally. but because it, because it creates an atmosphere in which a paranoia is so high, that certain events can be misreads by the other side. and then, and things can go out of course, just because of a series of mistakes. and i think that we are in a really grave a situation of a possible aah, global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes after we're done with the imminent threat,

international grain shipments and escalating global hunger. we're among the main topics at the g 20 summit, which is wrapped up in bali rushes. foreign minister agreed that moscow was interested in extending the green deal, allowing russia and rational ukrainian, we, and fertilizers to be exported through the black sea. but only if supplies go to the countries that need them the most. on the sidelines of the summit, we spoke to the russian minister of finance about the green and energy crises. he said there rushes activity at. the summit proves that the west has failed to isolate moscow. is due to move him to p. yes indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relates to the russian federation, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization. you're asking about continuing the grain bill to the many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal. because we all see the situation was hunger in the number of

african countries, and so the flow of grain. so to these countries was a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal and the source of communication with colleagues. so j love rav speaking of the summit of leaders said that russia is for the continuation of the deal, only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries. and countries of a european economy as is happening now. therefore, we spoke in favor of continuing the tail under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions hit them since they lead to price increases and such increases into the growth of the economy. and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources. removing all barriers that prevent us from exporting our end. he resorted to other

countries. and to day there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy, and the g 20 itself was always considered. the issue was a world economy and its dynamics. all this was stressed by the russian delegation and i think that the western countries heard this on behalf of our anti delegation . i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes. in the speeches of an individual western countries during the event of the g 20, there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and calls for rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy and not a single issue can be resolved without us is or is his caresses. the african union, which includes $55.00 countries, should become a permanent member of the g 20 that's according to the south african president. he says, the global food and energy crises can only be solved for the the continents help we call for continued g 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as

a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms. in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and energy and security across our world. africa as issues have been one of the main topics at this year's g. 20 summit eyes the continent phases, increasing hunger, china's president has also back the idea of inviting more african countries to join the international group, the world total. my roof ery, china supports the african union succession to the g. 20. the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account. professor antony van new kirk says that it's crucial for african countries to play a bigger role in organizations like the g 20. the g 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance their own

prospects in the global economy and, and local governance. by the way, there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important. i think for africa then the g, 20, many of the problems in africa relating to peace, security, conflict, instability, resort exploitation are caused by colonial, any period behavior by exploitation, by external actors. and so many of the problems that africa faces are not caused by africa itself. although we can't escape some blame of course, but nevertheless, some of the big issues. for example, you know, when in gas when actually sources are discovered, then the former colonial masters are quick to, to, to jump into africa with promises of development, aid and support. and a seat at the table, all important decision making, machinery and instruments. but we know what the agenda are,

which is why my view. it is important for the, for africa entity presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the t 20 to protect it interests and enhance its own stature. but at the same time, it cannot be only in international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the way, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. bricks i think is really important and might become even more important in this global term will that we are going through and some even speak ahead of i will of the non line movement maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa has different options to choose from and as must be very careful who it makes, aligns as best as we face this turbulent time. globally canyon troops have arrived at the war, ravaged east of the democratic republic of congo in a bit to help the congo these government fund off the m 23 rebels. the soldiers who

flew into go math from narrow b r. part of the 900 canyon troops who have been sent to the d. r. c. they will be joined by troops from other east african member states to help the congo lead government battle rebels who now control key towns. former canyon president kenyatta has visited a conflict zone in the democratic republic of congo, where he met with people displaced by the fighting and pleaded with warring sides to end the clashes. sally, i my name is you and we have all sin, the children, the mothers, the old men who are now become an displaced in their own country. and no matter what our differences are, even though we have our problems please, let's have mercy on them. let's still de swore and start a dialogue. so what can be the visit? can the med continuing clashes between the congo least army and am 23 rebels who have more than doubled territory under their control in recent weeks by taking

control of key towns, according to local officials, more than 200000 people have been displaced since the fighting began the east african community has scheduled a november 21st piece talk in the canyon capital aimed at defusing the crisis we spoke to hassan can n g, who believes that the talks will help ease the situation. the current escalation, especially in conflict or considering that has been reported as an infinite via making advances towards goma, eats extremely dangerous. and the threatens, that they can kind of busy initiatives and efforts being made right now by regional countries led by the president of canyon one cause a team about next week's dea talks ease and they're taking place on, mediated by president til looking out of prison of kenya, who seems to have a good wheel, bullets up from the government of update video, see,

as well as the ripples and in parties. a google has been build a policy the last few years by these also a collect to rid of mission in the region that is going to pick nice to end in pots because it's yes out of one of the pump. exactly what's going on. and so that a demonstration of goodwill, as well as the kind of of consensus, oh, when comes through, they need an agency to so the conflict can add some fuel to what, what is alicia? joe biden has visually congratulated the republican party with securing its majority in the house of representatives in the mid term elections. despite the result being a projection republicans are already sol, brain victory will be required. 218 majority reached by the expect. it the house will replace nancy pelosi as a speaker. the senate, however, remains under the democrats, by ends administration, was able to secure

a one vote majority amid the ongoing us trying to trade war a top world, bank official says that you country shouldn't dominate discussions on subsidies or restrictions for other countries. we have to manage it in a way that builds trust and provides predictability. otherwise, it can lead to higher costs and who pays for higher costs? consumers and developing countries who can be shut out of these global value chains . the world bank also says that subsidies and trade restrictions should be applied hand in hand with the world trade organization, which has its own means of insuring market stability. this comes after us trade representative. katherine tight said that washington's aim is to prevent beijing from using quote, non market policies. i think that is part and parcel with the non economic practice and concerns, and we will continue to work on those issues. journalists,

action ritathui says that institutions like the i m f and the world bank have cause great problems across the developing world for many years. well, who is this? the managing director of the world bank? you don't have to be john perkins, his book, economic whitman, conventions of ego, again, when a showed how that institution with the i m. f has done so much to torture and misery. hundreds of millions of people across the developing world, the so long to to know a bit about or i'm, he's very difficult from that interview to take the managing director of the world bank. seriously. especially when, of course, breaks on as seo or you know, that coming fast on the tracks of both those institutions. i remember being here in, in do my 22 years ago being told in foreign affairs magazine, the china will never be a powerful country at all. i don't think john is worrying too much about any of

this, and you know, none of the bricks a country leadership saw they seem very excited. indeed, i'm coming to you from, from do you by. i was at a conference here and organized by ross congress, moderating in the u. a health ministry was saying, we've got to have close collaboration, business cooperation in elca, for instance, with russia. and that's not the kind of thing you're going to hear in the european union. it is in the global south, which opposes everything. arguably, the world bank, p i m f, and increasingly the w stanfull ukrainian government website dedicated to raising funds for key abs. war effort has been taken offline just days before multiple scandals involving its crypto currency partner erupt. it that's according to the grades on news website. the partnership with crypto currency exchange f t x was 1st announced back in march when he had launched its site for donations. as

t x pledge to convert contributions in the cash she spent on ammunition and humanitarian aid. $60000000.00 were said to have been subsequently received their grades and reported that before the deletion, the amount of donations had not been officially updated for some time raising concerns over how much had been raised and distributed earlier. my colleague, nikki errant, discuss this with other of the greys own report kit clarin berg. this merits. it is, well, it wasn't receiving donations anyway, why would you launch a new website? why would you know, just close it down? and you know, this is all very, very strange. i think that the, i mean, it could just be coincidence. but 5 days before the website read october 21st, texas financial authorities now. and she and investigations where to potentially practices and selling the financial products. now this website in, on april 1st or 2 weeks offer launch,

it updated it records to state it received $17000000.00. this was revised down to over 60000000. 5 days later it's not clear why. and they could be missing 10000000 in the next at the very least already. but then it was really quite bizarre in a boat in april and in july it published updates all of it spending on various, you know, weapons radios and fuel rations. well, the things you might need while you're fighting a war, but it doesn't appear to have gained anymore funds the total of 60000000 or was it 70000000? we don't know what was on change. you have the mainstream media, western media at picked up any of these details. i'm so, you know, i mean, this is, you know, of course, to be expected. i mean, you know, all of the information is that all public, i mean, even though yes, government credit seems to have taken measures to raise quite low. this means that

you can still find it using well cards. i mean, it's quite extraordinary that the, the, that the x has been documented in forensic minute by minute detail is dominating by the financial media and the wider, you know, mainstream pressure. but no one has called it the very obviously oh, you know why, how was a donation resource for you kind. ready in march, and then apparently only raises 62 and a half weeks look ration. but you know, has been organizations the whole time. i mean, it seems inconceivable as well. i mean how much we don't know where it's gone. we know i did. we need the answers at the i director christopher reg, warned us on makers on tuesday that allowing to talk to continue operating in the united states could pose a threat to national security. we do have national security concerns, obviously from the f b i z

n about tick tock. the chinese government could use it to control data collection on millions of users or control the recommendation algorithm which could be used for influence operations if they so choose or to control software on millions of devices. however, the f b, i doesn't appear to see similar threats from us platforms like facebook, which has had its own share of scandals caused by massive leaks of user personal data. back in 2018, a former employee of facebook's british consulting firm cameras. emma analytics revealed their personal data, nearly 90000000 users with collected without their consent. the following year, facebook was find $5000000000.00 by the federal trade commission due to its policy violations. but the social media giant continued operating with founder mark soccer burke, saying that the med take cooperation with the f b i seriously. if the f b i, which i still view is a legitimate institution in this country. it's

a very professional lawn force and they come to us and tell us that we need to be on guard about something that i want to take that seriously. we spoke to legal in media analyst lionel, who says that there is a thin line between ensuring safety of citizens and imposing censorship. when launch forestman comes forward and does what law enforcement should by trying to protect the consumer to make sure that your data, your information are not being used or stolen. that's a good thing. if that's what government does. if that's what government does. if it comes in to shut down a platform or a means of expression that it finds problematic or it finds to be not consistent with the government message, that's a different story. then that becomes censorship. you've got to have and develop an allergy for when ever any intelligence lawn forestman anywhere

comes in and looks out for you looks out for you to make sure you don't get. and here's the most important disinformation misinformation. we don't want you to get the wrong information. we want to protect you, because after all, that's dangerous. that's all for now. be sure to check out our t v dot com. we're all boy is breaking news and updates. we'll see right back here at the top of the hour. ah, ah, ah, with

a ah a ah, lisa canter, russian state patrol narrative. i've stayed on the most landscape with eclipse in 55. been okay, so mine is to 5 must be the one off with we

will van in the european union, the kremlin media machine, the state on russia for date and school ortiz spoke mckibben, our video agency, roughly all brands on youtube with me. oh, when i was showing wrong, when i just don't hold any well, yes to safe out disdain becomes the advocate and engagement equals betrayals. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look so common ground

with ah, the stuff for the wooden business and then you will clean the area a, b, e l does not assume zine. yeah. americans, grain. when you wrote it, you know, you got to have it is just such an upgraded to the ceiling and provide you with stuff such and sure. of course, you may not have a fitness center pool which helps to wash him, get you thrown with them to throw in just a moment. that was true. i made sure that it was correct. it was i was sick yesterday she louis louis this is jill meadow.