ah, with was not just an intentional attempt at this information, but it conscious attempts to bring me to which is currently conducting a proxy war, into a direct conflict with our country rushes ambassador to the un slams allegations of moscow's involvement in poland. missile incident as anti russian hysteria, adding the accusations could have led to a dangerous escalation. that's as western powers admit, the fallen missile apparently came from ukraine with p at going against his allies narrative existing. it was not a ukrainian nestled floss the south african leader calls on the june 20 group to

accept more countries from the continent into their ranks as africa pushes for a bigger role in geo politics. a mosque out of the world. this is our t international. i'm rachel blevins here with the top stories of the hour. welcome to the program. poland has decided not to invoke a provision of nato's charter for an inquiry into the missile incident. the un security council can mean to discuss the situation. according to russia, un ambassador, the missile incident was a deliberate provocation by ukraine and poland to bring nato into the conflict. yes, we believe this meeting had not been scheduled. we would have had to convenient anyway to discuss the attempts by ukraine and poland throats to provoke a direct clash between russia and nato. but it was not just an intentional attempt

of this information, but a conscious attempt to bring natal, which is currently conducting a proxy war, into a direct conflict with our country. at the meeting, we heard russia present evidence regarding the deadly incident in poland. and russia came forward and pointed out that these allegations that were leveled at russia in the aftermath of the incident, diesel allegations led to a very dangerous escalation. it appeared. this was an attempt to draw nato countries in the conflict in ukraine, which is quite serious, and russia presented evidence. we did hear from different countries that spoke. they continued to criticize russia, but they did not focus on the incident. they didn't repeat some of the heavy allegations that were escalating things within the previous the previous day, previous 24 hours. it seems like they are moving away from trying to blame russia

for the deadly incident. but it was pretty clear that western leaders did very much want to keep the focus on demonizing, russia. we've heard from the nato chief stolen burger from the german chancellor. they do admit that this missile, it appears to have been of ukrainian origin. and that the deadly incident that took place was not the direct responsibility of russia. however, they continued to argue in kind of a convoluted way, because the conflict itself is one that they blame on russia, that the incident is, therefore, russia's fault here. some of what we've heard to have no indication that this was the result of a deliberate attack. and you have no indication that the russia is preparing offensive military actions against natal. the incident will slightly caused by a ukrainian air defense mi sign, fired to the fens, ukrainian territory against russian cruise missile attacks. but let me

be claire. this is not ukraine's fault. russia bears ultimate responsibility as it continues. it's illegal, war against ukraine. guns is one thing is clear, no matter who's rocket it was, and for whatever reason it fell in poland. this would not have happened if russia had not started a war against ukraine. now this is slightly different than what we've heard from the landscape and the ukraine government, despite all of the weapons and support that's been given to me, it appears that they trust their own general more than they trust the western countries and their own investigation. the words that we're hearing from granting official seem to indicate that they still blame russia who are the deadly incident . here's what we've heard from this, from the allies. i have no doubt about the reports and the commander of the 4th and

commander in chief allusion in that it was no time missile and not a missile strike. i have no reason not to trust them because i've been through this whole war with them. well, this is quite interesting. we see the lensky basically saying that the dutch prime minister, the white house, the pentagon, the nato cheese, the german chancellor, all of them are not correct. do you think you'd be insisting that somehow this is russia's fault? this is russia doing and it reminds us of what was said before the un security council by ambassador benzine. when he spoke for the council, you said this was got to rob occasion and candid to draw nato directly into the conflict and watching the granting leaders stick to it. despite the fact that western leaders who have been quite quite generous and giving quite a bit of weapons and support to the government. the fact that now we have the government here insisting that. busy no, they are wrong. this could not have been inherited metal from,

from ukrainian forces. the fact that we're hearing that things indicate there may be a sign of the key of government kind of thumbing its note at the nato countries that have given them so much military support. over the last few months, journalist and political analysts, john rowley says that the west is likely to turn a blind eye to cranes. involvement in the missile incident created the native protector. in course, they have gone to do whatever they want. any outrage, provocation is acceptable for nato. any ukranian publications? this is a war of nerves. it's a propaganda war of the site. sy, off the idea is to, under russia under moscow as you know, ukraine, the de facto protectorate of nato, of the usa. so they can of course, do whatever they want and it will be forgiven. it will be, it will be ignored. for example, incident like this. okay, so they,

so you brain kill to be said, no big deal of russia did it. we're going to vote article 5. let's start world war 3. you're dealing with extremely unhinge irresponsible people in washington in london and in brussel with ukraine. anything is possible because they are trying to drag, you may go into the conflict into their conflict. right? with russia, they are trying to do that, so i think it's quite probable. also, there was an accident. they were trying to shoot down a russian missile. but chances are, this is a deliberate effort to provoke nato to invoke article 5 and to tack russia possible . and other developments c, u. s. secretary of homeland security says americans shouldn't worry about a possible nuclear escalation. ukraine has any potential fall out would not affect the us. although the united states has expressed concern about the russian nuclear unrest. we do not anticipate that

a nuclear detonation in europe would have direct health consequences in the country . meanwhile, donald trump, who's an l. c, will run for hasn't again, in 2024 has accused the global community of overlooking a growing nuclear threat. oh, the re new deals and the environment which they say may affect us in 300 years is all that is talked about. and yet nuclear weapons which would destroy the world immediately are never even discussed as a major threat. can you imagine they say the ocean will rise 18th of an inch over the next 200 to 300 years. but don't worry about nuclear weapons that can take out entire countries with one shot. oh, very advanced professor steven guy. it says that an atmosphere of global paranoia over the situation ukraine is creating a real nuclear threat. it seems to me that we live now in an era where

a nuclear threat is imminent and people got used to it. i really think this is more dangerous, not necessarily because somebody wants to to go ballistic literally, but because it, because it creates an atmosphere in which a foreign oil is so high that certain events can be misreads by the other side. and then i, things can go out of course, just because of a series of mistakes, and i think that we are in a really grave, an association of a possible aah, global nuclear conflict. the global warming is important, of course, the levels of the ocean all that. but this all comes off or we are done with the imminent threat,

international grain shipments and escalating global hunger. we're among the main topics at the g 20 summit, which is wrapped up and bali rushes. foreign minister agreed that moscow is interested in extending the brain deal, allowing russian and ukrainian we, and fertilizers to be exported through the black sea. but only if supplies go to the countries that need them the most. on the sidelines of the summit, we spoke to the russian minister of finance about the grain and energy prices. he said the rushes activity at the summit proves the west has failed to isolate moscow just to confirm the symptom. yes, indeed. many issues were discussed at the summit that directly relate to the russian federation, such as the energy crisis, grain, health issues. we also actively participated in discussions and digitalization. you're asking about continuing the grain bill to that many g 20 countries proposed to continue the deal. because we all see the situation with hunger and the number of african countries. and so the flow of grain. so to these countries was

a major topic of discussion. the russian delegation drew attention to the grain deal and the source of communication with colleagues says a love, rob, speaking of the summit of leaders, said that russia is for the continuation of the deal. only for grain that is supplied under the black sea agreements to go precisely to countries which urgently need grain but not to western countries and countries with a european economy as is happening now. therefore, we spoke in favor of continuing the deal under the control of grain dispatch points . so grain would go to countries that really need it. we also talked about the need to control the volume of energy supplies and prices about the various restrictions that western countries impose. and that these restrictions hit them since they lead to price increases and such increases in the, the growth of the economy and the well being of people living in these countries. therefore, we are in favor of removing all barriers to the export of energy resources. removing all barriers that prevent us from exporting our and he resorted to other countries. and to day, there are many barriers. this homes, the world economy,

and the g 20 itself was, it was considered the issue was a world economy and its dynamics. all of this was stressed by the russian delegation, and i think that the western countries heard this on behalf of our anti delegation . i can say we do not feel any isolation here. yes, in the speeches of an individual western countries joining the events of the g 20. there was a certain tone in terms of restrictions and culture rush at the end. it's special operation, etc. but no issue was discussed without russia on key issues. since our country is a significant part of the world economy and not a single issue can be resolved without us. versus the african union, which includes $55.00 countries, should become a permanent member of the g 20. that according to the south african president who says that the global food energy crazy is, can only be saw through the continents. how we call for continued g. 20 support for the african renewable energy initiative as

a means of bringing clean power to the continent on african terms. in this regard, this can be best achieved with the african union joining the g 20. as a permanent member, it is only through a collective and united response that we can resolve the challenges of food and energy and security across our world. africa's issues have been one of the main topics at this year's g. 20 summit has the continent faces increasing hunger. china's president has also back the idea of inviting more african countries to join the international group. all the worlds total my roof area, china's supports the african union succession to the g. 20. the concerns of developing countries must be taken into account. her fessor, antony van, new kirk says that it's crucial for african countries to play a bigger role in organizations like the g 20. the g. 20 is not the only international instrument that africans can use to promote and enhance their own

prospects in the global economy and local governance. by the way. there are other forums and alliances, for example, bricks which might be even more important, i think, for africa than the g. 20 many of the problems in africa relating to peace, security, conflict, instability, but a source exploitation are caused by colonial, any period behavior by exploitation, by external actors. and so many of the problems that africa faces are not caused by africa itself, although we can't escape some blame of course. but nevertheless, some of the big issues, for example, you know, when well and gas when actually sources are discovered, their former colonial masters are quick to, to jump into africa with promises of development, aid and support, and a seat at the table, all important decision making machinery and instruments back, we know what the agenda are, which is why my view is important for the f,

for africa as it is presented by the a you to take its place at the bargaining table with the g 20 to protect its interests and enhance its own stature, but at the same time can a, it cannot be the only in international instrument available to the african continent controlled by the west, which is why i mentioned one or 2 other instruments. bricks i think is really important and might become even more important in the global term will that we are going through and some even speak of a revival of the non in line movement, maybe in a modern form. so yes, africa has different options to choose from, and it must be very careful who it makes alliances. but as we faced this turbulent time globally, ah, canyon troops have arrived at the war, ravaged east of the democratic republic of the congo in a bid to help the congo least government offend. i'm 23 rebels. the soldiers who

flew into goma from narrow b are part of over 910 troops who have been sent to the d. r. c. they will be joined by troops from other east african member states to help the congo these government battle rebels who now control the towns. former canyon president kenyatta has visited a conflict zone in the democratic republic of the congo, where he met with people displaced by the fighting and pleaded with warring sides to end clashes. yeah, liam, i made you. we have all seen the children, the mothers, the old man who are now become and displaced in their own country. and no matter what our differences are, even though we have old problems, please, let's have mercy on them. let's stop this war and started dialogue. so what do you mean the visit? can the med continuing clashes between the congo lee's army and m 23 rebels who have more than doubled their territory and recent weeks by taking control of key

towns, according to local officials, more than 200000 people have been displaced since fighting began these african community has scheduled peace talks for november 21st. in the canyon capital aimed at defusing, the crisis we spoke to hassan can. angie, who believes that talks will help ease the situation. the current escalation, especially in conflict considering that it's been reported that mtc making advances towards goma extremely dangerous. and he threatens kind of the initiatives and efforts being made right now by regional countries laid by one positive about next week's talk. these are that taking place, mediated by looking at the canyon who seems to have a good we'll both from the government as well as the ripples unemployment. people

will have been b, c the last few years, but they also collect to read admission in the region that is config needs to any impacts because it's just part of one of the conference actually going on. and so in that demonstration of goodwill as well, that kind of consensus when it comes to the need and i didn't see to so the conflict some fuel was sort of the listen. joe biden has officially congratulated the republican party for securing a majority in the house of representatives in the mid term election. despite the result being a projection republicans are already celebrating their victory with the required 218 majority reached by the g. o. p. it is expected that the house will replace nancy pelosi as speaker. the senate however, remains under the democrats, as biden's administration was able to secure a one. but with jordy i mean the ongoing

us china trade war i top world bank official says that the 2 countries shouldn't dominate discussions on subsidies or restrictions for other countries. we have to manage it in a way that builds trust and provides predictability. otherwise, they can lead to higher costs and who pays for higher costs. consumers and developing countries who can be shut out of these global value chains. the world bank also says that subsidies and trade restrictions should be applied hand in hand with the world trade organization, which has its own means of insuring market stability. this comes after us trade representative catherine time, so that washington's aim is to prevent beijing from using quote, non market policies. i think that is part and parcel with the non economic practice and concerns and we will continue to work on those issues. journalist action

ritathui says that institutions like the i m f and world bank have cause great problems across the developing world for many years. well, who is this managing director of the world bank? you don't have to be john perkins, whose book, you know, make a hit man conventions of ego yet when it showed how that institution with the i m. f has done so much to torture and misery. hundreds of millions of people across the developing world for so long to know a bit about him. he's very difficult from that interview to take the managing director of the world bank seriously, especially when of course breaks on their seo or you know, that coming fast on the tracks of both those institutions. i remember being here in, in do my year 22 years ago being told in foreign affairs magazine, the giant will never be a powerful country at all. i don't think john is worrying too much about any of this. and you know, none of the bricks,

country leadership saw they seem very excited. indeed, i'm coming to you from, from do you by. i was at a conference here and organized by ross congress, moderating in the u. a health ministry was saying, we've got to have close collaboration, business cooperation, and healthcare, for instance, with russia. and that's not a guided thing. you're going to here in the european union. it is in the global south, which opposes everything. arguably, the world bank, p i m f, and increasingly w stanfull ukrainian government website dedicated to raising funds for key abs. war effort has been taken offline just days before multiple scandals involving its crypto currency partner erupt. id that's according to the greys own news website. the partnership with crypto currency exchange f t x was 1st announced back in march when key have launched it site for donations at t. x pledge to convert contributions into cash to spend on ammunition and

humanitarian aid. $60000000.00 for side to have been subsequently received their grades out, reported that before the deletion, the amount of donations had not been officially updated for some time raising concerns over how much had been raised and distributed earlier. my colleague, nikki aaron discussed those with other of the grades own report kit, clarin berg. the fish merits. it is, well, it wasn't receiving donations anyway. why would you launch a new website? why would you not just close it down? this is all very, very strange. i think that the, i mean it should just be 2 incidents, but 5 days before the website read october 21st, texas financial authorities now launching an investigation threat to potentially legal practices and selling legal financial products. now this website in, on april 1st, are you 2 weeks of launch? it updated it records to state it received $17000000.00. this was revised

down to over 60000000. 5 days later, it's not clear why it could be missing 10000000 in the next at the very least already. but then it was really quite bizarre. in april and in july, it published updates on of its spending on various weapons radios and fuel rations was one of things you might need while you're fighting a war, but it doesn't appear to gain anymore funds the total of 60000000 or was it 70000000 we don't know what was on change. you have the mainstream media, western media at picked up any of these details. i'm so, you know, i mean, and this is, you know, of course, to be expected. i mean, you know, all the information is that all public, i mean, even though yes, government ukraine seems to have taken measures to raise quite low. this means that you can still find that using well cards. i mean,

it's quite extraordinary that the, the, that the x has been documented in forensic minute by minute detail is dominating by the financial media and why the mainstream press. no one has called it the very obviously oh, you know why, how will i donation results for you? trends in march. and then apparently only raises 60 and it's 1st 2 weeks look ration. but you know, has been to nations the whole time. i mean, it seems inconceivable as well. i mean how much we don't know where it's gone. we know i did we need the ox is nam may i? director christopher re warned us lawmakers on tuesday that allowing tick tock to continue operating in the united states. good pose, a threat to national security. we do have national security concerns, obviously from the f b i z n about tick tock. the chinese government could use it to control data collection

on millions of users or control the recommendation algorithm which could be used for influence operations if they so choose or to control software on millions of devices. however, the f b, i doesn't appear to see similar threads from us platform. facebook, which has had its own share of scandals caused by massive weeks of users personal data back in 2018, a former employee of facebook, british consulting firm cameras. analytic reveal the personal data of nearly 90000000 users was collected without their consent. the following year facebook was fined $5000000000.00 by the federal trade commission due to its privacy violations . but the social media giant continued operating with founder mark soccer burke, saying that meta takes cooperation with the f b. i seriously book if the f b i, which i still view is a legitimate institution in this country. it's a very professional line force and they come to us and tell us that we need to be

on guard about something that i want to take that seriously. we spoke to legal and media analysts line on it says that there is a thin line between ensuring safety of citizens and imposing censorship. when launch forestman comes forward and does what law enforcement should by trying to protect the consumer to make sure that your data, your information are not being used or stolen. that's a good thing. if that's what government does. if that's what government does. if it comes in to shut down a platform or a means of expression that it finds problematic or it finds to be not consistent with the government message, that's a different story. then that becomes censorship. you've got to have and develop an allergy for when ever any intelligence law enforcement anywhere

comes in and looks out for you looks out for you to make sure you don't get. and here's the most important disinformation misinformation. we don't want you to get the wrong information. we want to protect you, because after all, that's dangerous. that's all for now. we sure check out our t dot com for all believe is breaking news and updates. we'll see you right back here at the top of the hour. ah, ah

ah ah mm with a so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy even foundation,

let it be an arms race group is on offense. very dramatic development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical time time to sit down and talk with i look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence at that point, obviously is too great trust,

rather than fear. i would like to take on various job with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot most protective own existence with small boy, is this the best of both? no issue. my for the mobile one, annual g d. p per capita is about $4000.00 euros. i'm calling in a mobile with a planner, cost the seal for the, for any auto renew, please. when you switch, restoring your mobile home to come out, please note your little.