just as i can just walk on the billing system a, what i see the senior boss who's no room you medation says decent to to gumbo sub. ah, the ukranian president now says he's not sure who's responsible for a myth file that came down in poland, killing 2 people. that's just one day after he claimed the massage was russian on cold for a western response. $11800000.00 is going to assistance, including for direct budget support. the question is, is ukraine. now the 51st state of the united states of america, republicans pledge the count, every sense of financial aid allocated to key it is the policy prepares to take control of the house of representatives and

a biased on politically motivated verdicts against russia. for that's moscow's reaction to the hague verdict on the 17 plane crash. ah, from moscow to the world, you're watching r t international. my name is peter scott with the top stories. it's 11 am moscow time. welcome to the program. the ukranian president's now says he's not 100 percent. sure. if the parents miss out, it's kill 2 people in poland on tuesday was russian. that's a sharp contrast to his previous statements. sure. ah, voice, i don't know what happened this time. we don't know. 100 percent. i think the world also does know what happened on present in the situation. we have to be fair and honest until the investigation is over. give you how many times as you claim

said that the actions of the terrorist state will not be limited to our country alone. pissing nato territory with miss isles. this is a russian missile attack on collective security. this is a really significant escalation. action is needed. this comes as ukraine clashed with its western allies in a rare public rift. reports have emerge, suggesting that biden's national security advisor asked ukraine and officials to trek carefully with their accusations. the u. s. president also reportedly refused to speak with zelinski fall an incident. despite the ukrainian leaders repeated requests and his are biding, responded when asked about his version of those events. i on tuesday, a michelle crushed into a polish village near the ukrainian border, killing 2 people. within ours,

a number of polish and ukrainian government officials, including zalinski, claimed it was a russian rocket. warsaw later conceded the rock. it was likely a ukrainian air defense miss other went to stray a position that has also been echoed by nato and washington. although an official investigation is still under way, the ukrainian presidential adviser has said it should encourage nato to be tougher on moscow asking the country's allies to provide more defense systems or the key of has been excluded from participating in the official investigation. anonymous nato source told the financial times at western confidence in keith had been undermined . this is getting ridiculous. the ukrainians are destroying our confidence in them . nobody is blaming ukraine and they are openly lying. this is more destructive than the missile. and this is incredibly destructive to the key of regimes propaganda because here we see them being directly contradicted and doubling down on the lie in the face of even the u. s. president himself saying otherwise,

i think that this is not so much them are trying to break free as reacting petulantly as a child confused. because they have become used to an expectant that whatever absurd lie that they claim blaming russia will be backed up by them. um, as if it's god's honest truth, no matter the situation. but here we see with a, a direct potential ward war 3 sparking event with a missile landing and a nato member that, that they walked back from that a, poland should rethink it, stun sewell's, ukraine in the wake of that deadly missile incidence. that's according to the former man of the polish city of lubin. of course, this is a ukrainian rocket. of course, this is a provocation on the part of the ukranian authorities. the rocket could not be

fired 100 kilometers in the opposite direction by mistake. the purpose of the provocation is to accelerate the supply of weapons to ukraine, to intimidate europe with terrible russia, so that civil society demands an increase in assistance the ukraine from the governments of european countries. we have seen a ukrainian regime ad dedicated to this process of trying to drive natal on european countries into this war. and there, there is a form of what not formal. there is a brinkman ship being played on the part of the ukrainian military authorities and its government. but quite frankly is a dangerous situation to how europe in it has been clear from salt and. busy bergs position that this is not being, you know, treated the way the ukrainian government would like to be treated. but there is also the fear that elements within natal may wish for best to be treated the

exactly of the provocation. and as a reason for natal involvement, so whether it has been an accidental, sophistic straight going off target or it has are the that may have had the made of liberal, has that it has been by a deliberately in the wrong direction. then both to the same thing, you know, ultimately a provocation on the part of ukraine. let's cross live now to hendrick, weber's norwegian rights, a political analyst, and form up politician. and jeff, thanks so much for joining us in the studio today. thank you. am i guess it makes off by starting off talking about this incidence in poland? how do you think that the western politicians and immediate reacted to this incidents i don't know about you by suddenly woke up to some shocking headlines that morning. i that's right, but it's easy as it's as easy as possible. as a always reg, blame the russians and then we can see what will happen. so at the 1st time of most of them are over. the politicians of course, say that sir,

russia is sending this missile and, and then maybe we find out that it was a ukraine. ah, but then this case is already forgotten. so it's always the same. first blame the russians, and then we'll see what happened yet. you said, you think this incident was over blown? i mean, as far as potential flush points in this one ukraine. how significant would you say this polish incident was? i think it was not so important. of course, it should not happen if we could avoid all this all this war, of course, but it is not one of the most important points in this sir case, or in this war, no, biden, and the polish did they seem to have so fell. it measured responses to this incident. were you surprised by that? and now i think it's not surprising because say the polish share politicians have 1st to wait, which kind of order they get from washington, or they can say,

that is my view on this case. and 1st we blame the russians and then we'll find out, okay, it was or, or the comes in and you order from mary washington. and then we changed a little bit that the, this, there's a topic or the view on this, on this thing. we're talking about blaming the russians. president zalinski initially. so the flu in the face of washing and so on. poland, and continued to say it was a russian rocket. and that he had full confidence in his own troops. he has has since then seemed to roll back to that and says he not 100 percent. sure. now that it could be a ukrainian rocket. do you think he was playing his domestic audience in that it was a very rare rift between him and his western allies? yes, of course, say he is standing in the middle between there, between washington and the nato countries and his own as citizens in his own countries in his, in a very difficult situation and has to balance all the time

a what to say on one side, he is dependent on on money from western countries or otherwise say ukraine would go down wherever fast and depends on rap and lipp deliveries. and on the other side has to come down his own citizens. if so, he is in a difficult situation and has to change all the time a little bit the the view or the site. i think of when i'm talking of the, the blame game or nature's chief and the german chancellor. they have still maintained that ultimately, the blame for this incident does lie with russia that, that logic is that hot. this one started in the 1st place than and rashad not, not launch these. these, these missiles over ukraine, ukraine won't be launching missiles to take them down, and that is so on. that is completely right. yes. but if a western countries did not support and the cooper todd in 2014, then we don't would be in this situation at all. and so we in the entered so

question, way when to start for me in, in my mind that all the situation starts in 2014, maybe before that. and so if we would not have supported this through a coup d'etat in kiev, in 2014, we would not be in the situation now and would not be a war in ukraine at all. yeah, i think many people forget that this actually dates back, you know, before february 24th, that this, that i said before, for the most people and in our western press and the whole history, his thoughts in february and this year. but actually it starts 8 or almost 9 years ago. and when we forget about this history than we don't understand the situation right now. now initially, when, when this incident is miss an incident occurred in poland, there, there some sort in the media and, and rumors that nato would invoke article 5. now that, that does seem so di, done somewhat given the information, it's come to light. but do you think that nate's a will boost is air defense is now on the polish border with ukraine. i don't know,

and this is not an incident for article 5 at all. it, and i think nature, no, this is all too dangerous to involve ne, to in this directly. or we are already involved as through a delivery of weapon and all these kind of things. but, but i don't think that was sent. troops are really into the ground in ukraine, and if, if they are doing something with a different system, i don't know maybe. yes, i think that said u. s. s. secret services, a cia and the u. s. military knows very exactly what's going on in ukraine. all the time and they are sitting in cave and they are controlling a i think most of their ukrainian initiatives. so i think they know very exactly what is going on there. i did, they have emitter to supply and intelligence suits of ukrainians. do you think this

will affects weapon supplies to care if after this incident? i am and as another point to that question, we obviously know the republicans that they will take the house of representatives now. and this seems to be some division about continued aid supplies to ukraine, at least asking for some accountability as to where these weapons on this money is going. how do you see 8 supplies to ukraine changing the future? ah, the ukraine for ukraine. it's very important to get this weapon supplies and to, of course, we have to build up the history that these weapons supplies are very important to convince sir nato countries to give more money and more weapons am, i don't know what's happened now when the republicans said taking over a little bit more and the u. s. if they are still deliver is the same amount. i don't think it will stop directly. they will deliver weapon also. i'm but i don't

know what's what will happen the future? no, if it, if only we all you, what would happen in the house july for this one was so much easier. but just staying with that note. do you think that the chance of a somewhat ukraine fatigue setting in obviously america, europe, the u. k. they're also offering huge inflation at the moments sparling fuel costs or the cost of living crisis. do you think these domestic issues are going to influence the foreign policy of these blocks? that's why a cylinder is for him. it's so important to get this attention on ukraine because all the other european countries have their own problem problems now with increasing prices of a electricity eager oil. yes. and so that's for him. it's very important to get the intention attention of these countries said to ukraine, but i think at the people in other countries,

citizens in other european countries will soon a get very mad and very angry. i am and their governments have to decide what to do now. and maybe they change their views a little bit more to domestic problems. and, and, and that would be a problem for ukraine again. so it's a difficult situation for all the decisions in your own is and the, in the scope of our interview 40 doesn't allow us to, to speculate for too long on this, but, but his, the $1000000.00 question hendrick, do you, how do you see the situation been resolved in ukraine. some people for dates of is going to be an entrenched ball for years, decades to come at least a very cold and miserable winter. and do you see discussions at some point restocking a negotiations? i hope so. i hope so, but it depends on am. i think russia is open for that. i think also other european leaders would be open for that, but it, everything depends on washing a washington and says,

now we have to start real negotiations and for peace then it would be possible. i think am it's a question what they want. and the not been reports indeed that washington has tried to encourage representing to soften his stunts on, on negotiating while putin is in power. i'm sorry. may i say? it say yes. is it possible? because it, in the end, when this war ends, who is, who is a country, is building up ukraine again, that it would be russia maybe because a u. s. is not interested any more. they are losing their interests and turning round to other programs in the world. maybe it's china, and then ukraine is left, and no european country will build up a ukraine again. it will be russia. now moving on to sanctions. hendrick oversee russia is the most sanctioned country in the world. now think 8 packages of sanctions and there's a possible 9th in, in,

in talks how these sanctions affected russia and you think they've had the impacts that the ear in the west household. i don't. so i don't think that this impact is like they hoped am, and the most important and all this new sanction package, i don't know how many want to a improve her, maybe from 20 more. i don't know. the most important thing i think is that the people in the european countries at least believe that the sanctions are working. that's the most important because then the european leaders have a free pass and nobody is traveling really to russia to see if the sanctions are working. i'm now here in a week in the us here. they sanctions are not working here. is there light in the streets? the everything is working. well, i'm so there is really question of the sanctions of working at all and also blow back effect. do you think that having on europe itself, to what extent, as you are cutting off his nose to spite the faces, the old saying goes

a let me give a a short example. maya small assist there is studying in a big city in germany. he has a small apartment and normally she pays $30.00 for electricity. now she has to pay $150.00 a month. it's almost unfortunately for her to to get this amount of money, only for electricity. and so we see it clearly that blow back of the sanctions, but the as long as politicians and men edge to describe this sanctions or, or twisted around that is to blame russia again. and then people are not so angry and, but it's their own force. we could sofas problems very easily. well, i hope she's managing to stay warm there. i will, she will well, good. i may be next to jumper will, will help. i know my parents are doing the same. i'm not just looking more globally, that is a lot of talk, you know, particularly going from russia about

a shift ins of global power dynamics and move away from maybe the us in the western had gemini. so most of what is multi polar world. do you think this is we're seeing this now? a bible says in the counter argument to this been the while you're a nature more unified than ever, nature's even expanding. what would you say to that? i'm boasting, so maybe right, or on one side, nato countries are standing together. but nato countries. if you look on the weapon of the world world, there are not so many countries. and so we are seeing clearly it shift to a multiple, a world. well, and we've it no reason right at political analyst and form a politician. it's been great to get your thoughts on those a wide range of topics we discussed. today's been a pleasure talking to you. thank you. thank you repeated. ah, i know the news, the white house has hit back the republicans after the g o. p. 's pledge to probe jo biden's evolvement in his son hunter's foreign business dealings

r t correspondence kennimore bin has the story. so it appears that now the republicans are taking up the role the democrats once held, and now the biden administration may be subject to the kinds of investigation and scrutiny to which democrats held trump. this is what they said. our investigation is about jo, bud. and we already have evidence that would point that joe biden was involved with hunter biden, only just so we will the bank records and that's our, that's our focus. we're trying to stay focused on was joe biden directly involved with hunter biden's business deals, and is he compromised? that's our investigation. marjorie taylor green, a prominent congressional republican raised the issue of ukraine and the billions of dollars sent there by the biden administration. we're funding ukraine's budget with with trauma, $11800000000.00 is going to assistance,

including for direct budget support. the question is, is ukraine now the 51st state of the united states of america? and what position does the lensky have in our government? this is outrageous, and the american people deserve answers. the reality is that many of the weapons intended by the united states for the ukrainian military have gone directly into the hands of terrorists and criminal organizations. some of them have simply been sold on the black market and other questions are being raised about the money that is poured into your brain from the united states as well. so it seems that these questions may be taken up by republicans for congressional investigations, as they take control of the house of representatives. there is an interest in seeing where some of those funds have gone. and if there was in the foul play by the biden administration, and it's congressional allies, when it came to writing these 1000000000 and billions and billions of dollars to checks to you, crap, it's high time to stop sending any more money. don't send another penny to the

ukraine and to start auditing where the money went. so it'll be interesting to see how the u. s. congress proceeds. and what turns up in any potential investigation with republicans back in control of the house of representatives. the goal for the audits comes as the u. s. has already spent nearly $55000000000.00 on a few crane this year with $37000000000.00 and additional help requested by biden, from congress. and that's 20 percent more than was entire annual defense budgets. but the same time outspoken us congress wound marjorie taylor green has the last outset washington's funding of ukraine. after a number of countries i knowledge, it was likely a ukrainian rockets that hit poland. we must stop letting zelinski demand money and weapons from us taxpayers. while he is trying to drag us into world war 3, no more money to ukraine, it's time to end this war and demand peace. and as some officials demand an end to

the war before points of no returns reached the u. s. home security chief is apparently trying to calm people's nuclear worries. while the united states has express concern with russia, nuclear saber rattling, we do not anticipate that a nuclear detonation in europe would have any direct health consequences on the homeland. we spoke to retired us air force left tenant colonel, turn krakowski, who said that washington's poly towards ukraine is primarily driven by its own business interests. the united states defense establishment is making a lot of money out, you know, to via the american taxpayer. in depleting all of our reserves of old weapons, sending them to ukraine, that freeze up production lines for more of what we want. and then of course, justifies demand to the congress that our own budget, our own military budget can be increased. so this is something that i think benefits, it's viewed by american government, people as you know,

have benefits. it benefits america, not in the way that we think of a war. but just in the way we think of a business military business. the next house of representatives that will be sworn in in january. many of them do not see the benefit of conducting this proxy war and funding this proxy war in ukraine. it's very clear that we don't have the resources to throw away anywhere and certainly not to conduct a proxy war that has no real benefit to the security of americans. in the news, russia accused the hey, colts of bias saying it's verdicts on the image. 17 plain disaster is a politically motivated ruling against moscow. in passing its judgment, the court preferred to ignore the fact that all the conclusions of the dutch prosecutor's office are based on the testimony of anonymous witnesses, whose identities are classified as well as on information of dubious origin and

materials transmitted from the interested party. the s b u, which has been repeatedly convicted of providing false contradictory information. we deeply regret that the district court of the hague has neglected the principles of impartial justice in favor of the current political situation, thereby dealing a serious reputational blow to the entire judicial system of the netherlands. that is called sentence to 3 people to life in prison in absentia, for the unintentional downing of the plane over the don bus. in 2014, the suspect to russians on one ukrainian have denied any involvement before defendants or russian national has been acquitted. and has all the court describe this decision is not over them. the stevie to the defense presented as an argument that the prosecutor's office has a constantly one sided view which has been upheld throughout the entire investigation. so the essence of this defense line is that the prosecutor's office has adopted the point of view of the ukrainian special services from that point is

that the prosecutor received many materials from ukraine security service. however, the prosecutor's office has also carried out its own investigation. and has confirmed that the origin of the materials provided, although the call it concluded that made 17 crushed a few hours up to take off after being hit by a russian supplied missile. but judges didn't directly link the strike with russia . almost 300 people were killed on board. those conveyed, said will now need to pay over $16000000.00 euros to the victims families. the attorney of the acquitted defendant says he wants to know why not all of the wreckage from the aircraft was analyzed by western investigators was not taken into account by the court, but we don't know why. and it's still the problem of this summary verdict to say, therefore, we have to read the whole verdict in writing, but i'm very anxious to know why our, our arguments were not followed by the court. and the problem is that didn't onshore, let's say our arguments in our views, and please on,

on those aspects where the findings of a further investigation into image 17 are expected to be announced to some points next year. independent judge journalists, sonya vanda, and de believes that the trial like objectivity though it was a shell trial. because 1st of all, they did not really do a thoroughly investigation in the beginning. and the malaysian part that was not allowed to go to the place of the accident later on. they were allowed to do it. yeah, it was to be expected this show a trial. it would be like dead and i think it's empress, a dentist in yet that here is 6 and that just ignore defects. and this is what they are doing. the radar evidence was never taking into account. it was never at taken as a piece of evidence. also, i guess they didn't take into account and it actually wasn't ukrainian defect matters. what was found at the wreckage,

where the numbers olson ukrainian back 7379. so actually, you know, it's and ukrainian and good fella. so straight away they blamed russia, russia it is, and this is actually, so i think this whole trial is candy shoot. start with old pieces of evidence. they have from both sides. and then you can speak about a real fair trial, and this is not haven't and finally, the british governments has blocked the sale of the country's largest semi conducts of plants, chinese owned and experius. i think national security concerns today i've issued a final order under the n s. i act requiring next peria to sell at least 86 percent of new port wafer fab. we welcome foreign trade and investment that supports growth and jobs. but where we identify a risk to national security, we will act decisively. next barrier will have to sell 86 percent of it shares

despite the chinese government saving the company from bankruptcy back in 2019. but since m p 's dealings to beijing as a threats, hundreds of people may have to find new jobs. we are genuinely shocked. the decision is wrong, and we will appeal to overturn this divestment order to protect the over $500.00 jobs at newport. we spoke to the director of european studies at when min university of china, who thinks the decision is not in london's economic interest, but does comply with us foreign policy. this is a political interference of that market. at least $500.00 a job, so that be loose. and also for the for the british companies. competitive advantage also in danger and also to the investment environment for you . okay. put it off as a brag seat. so you'll have to be very neat. china,

maybe india market to replace it with a single market that you're paying you need. so those behavior actually is on their fi onto the oil or their turn on the u. k. relation, because you okay, so 5 eyes, airlines of united states. when the u. s. puts a lot of chips and semi conductor and then the force or the allies of the 5 ice allies to follow this law. so it doesn't even your case, not pendant not, you know, sacrifice the economic interests to serves for the american national security. well that's are up for now on peter scott ought to be back again in around 30 minutes time with the latest news views and analysis here on our c. c a, then the

ah ah ah ah .