[000:00:00;00] ah, [000:00:00;00] with the headlines on all t international, hungary, foreign ministers, the you all price copies a bad idea. at 7 european countries threatened to veto the blocks, restrictions on russian oil imports during an emergency meeting with russia's defense industry. so the railway trunks for foreign weapons, the kid forces was disrupted during wednesdays. high precision strike patrol to crane and to fund western accusations. moscow say not

a single russian rocket struck the city with a democratic republic of congo. and rwanda agreed to immediately seize, hold, still, it needs to withdraw the arms 4 and 23 from the congolese 8th, where they held a head to become the fastest growing g 20 economy next year. despite the global slow down, i'm even suggesting the country could overtake japan and germany to make the financial talk the rate. a very welcome to you. this is darcy international with the very latest world news update. its good to have you with no rush is that latest smith, all attacks on talk. it's across you cray not to swap to the flow all the western weapons to the conflict zone, according to russia's defense ministry, which i did the best strikes, did not target ukrainian capital last claimed by keith negotiations on

the introduction of a ceiling on gas prices. i can say that these are bad proposals, which also threaten europe's energy security. the ear right now is like a little group of girls and junior high school, the things they rule the whole town when all they really control is their own schoolyard. and they can't really even agree on how to do that. we're hearing today from the hungarian foreign minister that the blocks energy ministers could not agree on a natural gas price. ceiling and divisions have also emerged over a russian oil price cap, bulgaria hungry slovakia, the czech republic, estonia, poland, and latvia threatened to veto it for the block. arguing that the cap price will be set so high that it's virtually useless to day. russian oil is trading at 77.7 dollars down already from yesterday's $81.00 and that's without any price cap, which the u. s. argued needed to be higher than what the you initially wanted and

knox to avoid major global oil market disruption. russian, deputy prime minister, alexander novak has said that any customer implementing a cap just won't get oil. we're not planning to supply oil and petroleum products to countries which will apply the price cap. we could instead divert our supplies to market oriented partners or reduce output. the whole idea of a cap was cooked up in the 1st place between the g 7 and the unelected. you commission bureaucrats and it's supposed to be implemented starting december 5th, which is coming up pretty quick. on that day, the you is supposed to totally ban russian oil imports and their g 7 allies are supposed to stick to the cap price. but get this. the us treasury has already issued permits, allowing us firms to continue to provide maritime transport of russian oil, including t e u countries like bulgaria, croatia, and other landlocked member states of the you,

as long as they abide by the price caps. so, so much for all that, like height about the you banning russian oil. the idea of course is to deprive russian president vladimir putin of cash. they keep talking like they're hitting him personally. bam. right in the pocket book, which frankly isn't much more ridiculous than the idea of hitting the russian economy when the g 7 and e, you represent just a fraction of the world market. so what's the west going to do? sanctioned the rest of the world buying russian oil at market prices. former u. a secretary, treasury secretary steve minucci and sounds like he's in awe of the price cap idea . but in the way would be an av. someone jumping out of a plane without a parachute. i think it's the most ridiculous idea i've ever heard. a price cap. the market is going to set the price. so if you put sanctions on it, higher prices in a way, you're just making the situation worse. in my opinion, the you had already reduced its direct imports by 90 per cent in anticipation of this cap, all while gorging itself on russian fuel like

a fat kid who was about to be dragged away from the buffet table. they've imported it through offshore transfers between russian tankers and tankers of other countries. and also they've imported it from other countries that bring in russian oil themselves. and then you know, the authoritarian russian oil co mingled with molecules of oil from other nationalities and the storage tanks and then gets shipped out to the u. moscow's oil output has been humming along at its highest level since the onset of the ukraine conflict. that's according to western press reports, opec plus member state saudi arabia has pointed out that it's unclear how the cap would actually even work in practice. so looks like another largely symbolic act for the e u and not without huge potential blow back. but who's going to let pragmatic reality get the way of ideology? apparently not the european commission. president ursula vander line, who sounds like she's already limbering up for virtue signaling. the way in our

a singer does scale before a big performance. i'm confident that we will very soon approve a global price cap on russian oil with the g 7 and other major partners. we will not rest until ukraine has prevailed over putin and his unlawful and barbaric war. and washington is only too happy to cheer her on, as he continues right down this particular garden path to washington's own, ultimate economic benefit. now moving on, russia's latest missile attacks and targets across the ukraine of disrupt the flow of western weapons to the conflict zone. according to russia's defense ministry, we tried that is trying to not target the ukrainian capital as claimed by care. where does it go to? a little bit of the strike has disrupted the railway transfer of the ukrainian armed forces, their reserves, foreign weapons, military equipments, and ammunition to combat area. i would like to stress the fact that not a single strike was carried out on targets inside here of all of the destruction

inside the city declared by the regime is a result of falling ukrainian. and for an air defense missiles fired from residential areas of new cranium capital. so it's been circulating on social media, sharing missile de breeza to have been found that the scene in tears marked with the words know lift which appears to be long to an air defense system. similar to those washington sent to ukraine. 2 weeks ago, me want a number of western leaders were quick to condemn moscow for the strike the own ukraine, french president, emanuel mac, ron brown, did the attacks, a war crime which cannot go unpunished. and us secretary of state antony blinkin, said russia, they was to keep ukrainians cold. and then the dog, however, rush, representative to the un slammed wood called western double standards saying key of blockade of crimea on the dawn bus was ignored. logistical, many lamented that the residence of ukraine are at risk of being left without electricity and water. but we don't recall

a similar reaction in the west in 2015 when residents of crimea were left without water and electricity is due to ukraine's actions not to mention the dumbass, which has been started off economic oxygen for 8 years. this comes with ukraine, faith country wide blackouts, off a series of russian missile strikes. targeted its energy facilities that will apply in some areas, was also cut off with ukraine's energy infrastructure severely damaged off to 2 months of russian attacks. moscow say this goal is to we can ukraine's military and logistical capabilities as it responds to the flow of western on supplies. well, the west, the case is russia deliberately targeting ukrainian civilians that were tired, us on mcdonald douglas mcgregor se let's go with in fact, the great thing, the training and military which is the one that's been targeting residential areas and don't boss and other new russian territories we keep saying should be an

infrastructure, but if you're in a war and the electrical grid is supplying your troops and you destroy the electrical grid, it's not because you set out to harm civilians. you set out to deprive the military capacity of any access to energy. there's a lot of evidence. so on the other side, that high mars has been used to deliberately target russian civilians international hans, good and crime here and other places. i was a director of the joint operation center during the kosovo campaign. and we very rapidly ran out was in the 1st week and a half of let's say, military targets in the purest sense. i was, we'd hit all over airfields, we did barracks, these guys. things really wasn't much left over. he was flavio, remember was really almost a 3rd world country terms of development. he had gotten hurt for the associated press as find a journalist who was quick to believe

a source from us intelligence, who accused russia of targeting poland with a miss file. it was later admitted it was most likely a miss all 5 from ukrainian air defense systems for the tension spock face that nate, i would directly intervene in the ukraine. conflicts ortiz kellum open house. this house last week. it was almost world war 3. media told us that russia had attacked poland, a member of nato. now details are starting to come to light about the origins of this fake news. the journalist who filed this false story has since been fired, because apparently, despite all the talk of high journalistic standards, the agency didn't even look for a 2nd source to confirm this rather important news story. law poor to share the u. s. officials to pin an electronic massive should on 1 30 pm eastern time, and that, that i immediately asked if associated press should issue in the loads on his tip. or would we need confirmation from an all the source and all poland. after further

discussion, a 2nd added so sad that she would watch for publishing and the votes add in. i can imagine a us intelligence official would be wrong on this. so all the a p just ran with russia, did it. apparently, the polish president had a very different version of events from the beginning. some russian pranksters were able to call up duda, impersonating the french president mc kron. they had this chat last tuesday, the day the missile exploded. believe me, i have an extra thankful. i don't blame and the russian, i won't do it well. washer. never really. you don't do half of it. they don't do. it was with extra hateful, extra careful. now it's being kept from the u. s. public who the official was, who provided this false information to the a p. but the practice of us intelligence agencies,

crafting media narratives and distorting reality, is decades old. when we the c, i a wanted to circulate this information on a particular issue. this information is not necessarily not necessarily a lie, it may be a half truth, and we would pick out a journalist. i would go through that briefing and hope that he would put the information in print. now the job of journalists isn't to just repeat the words of the rich and powerful. it's to ask tough questions and dig for the truth. but apparently, at a moment where the danger of a new world war was hanging over the world, some journalists decided their job was simply to cut and paste from the cia my. take it that the argument that the united states government, the government that put forth the weapons of mass destruction, argument, the government that literally hired a public relations firm to create

a false story about iraqi soldiers throwing babies out of incubator is not working to stop mis information in this information, what they're doing is they're actually using that as a cover story, so that they can work to push with this information. so the reality is, it's just the cover story, the u. s. empires. mechanisms of control are running on some very, very easily debunked narratives. and they have to fight very hard to keep anyone who's pushing back against those narratives with empirical evidence from being heard. and the u. s. applied at miss all was responsible for another incident in ukraine back in september, which k have tried to blame on russia. that's according to a new expose, a from the new york times. the outlets report revealed the 3 civilians were wounded in the don. bye city of crime, a tourist after an american anti wait on missile hit a residential building where ukraine accused russia of the attack, which was going to them. and they denied the new york times that say,

this journalists analyzed, stay brief on the scene and concluded that an h e m a c h thomas style has been used off to being supplied to ukraine's armed forces by washington. let's go back now to our top story this, our 7 e u countries are threatening to veto the g 7 price comp on russian oil imports, while the proposed restriction on moscow's gases being ridiculed in the western media as an unworkable joke. let's not discuss this with richard ivana, a professor of banking and finance that the monford university. many thanks for joining the program is let me see. so we should also take on the biggest, from if occasions of these price cuts for europe and why exactly on several countries going against them? well, they come to agree, some say this price that they proposing as

a cap is too high and some say too low. and now that's the trouble. when bureaucrats or petition decide they want to set prices. and they used to be as a time when certainly in much of europe, people went favor of a market economy and market setting prices. but see how far we've come. it's now politicians and bureaucrats. the one to the price is obviously the european commission has been very much in the business of intervening for many years. but things have really accelerated. it doesn't make much sense. and that's the trouble in as to where you said, if you want to set the price cap, i think russia is like you just to sit back, watch and essentially continue what it's been doing, which is deliver roll materials,

oil and gas to its customers at market prices and prices that have been set by markets and then put into contracts. sometimes some people get a discount, but essentially, that's been the procedure and i don't see why russia should really be too concerned by this squabbling and actually political posturing going on in europe. which is, reveals that preference for the wholesale soviet has ation of the european union and the restriction of economic transactions that's, that's reached at, well, soviet proportions really. so to what extent would you say be your opinion restrictions would be a destabilizing fox. and when it comes to the broader global n g markets, but certainly, i don't see any destabilization of russia as a result and russia and has being

a reliable to delivering it, supplying raw materials to business owners. the problems that we've seen in europe are entirely self imposed by the europeans on themselves. and that's what they're trying to do. let's have some other european restrictions, harming the european economy. and i think on the global scale the impact is going to be limited. yes, of course, the biggest demand is you know, some of the biggest mama's and uses and consumers all over all materials and energy in particular on euro bought. you know, these unofficial restrictions can't really move. the market price is very much. so we'll just see the development like in the soviet union over several segmented markets. and you know,

where the market free market prices will be said. and by supply and demand. and we'll have to come up with an extra $25800000000.00 before 2024 to cover the loss. is that the country's largest gas in port a unit? once you assessment all of that situation, which is like the german gas joined to the brink of bankruptcy, i've been calling of importance from long term supplier. russia. especially considering that most of us, that he's prepared to deliver the gas in full as low as a fair price. precisely, exactly. so it is a shocking situation that needs to be analyzed. more and sadly, journalism in europe has had long cease to exist, it would it certainly the mainstream, traditional media ad because one needs to analyze is what's going on. why other german tech k as opposed to bailout these companies that are forced into bankruptcy, but falls off political decisions because of politicians and bureaucrats intervening in markets that were functioning quite well. and the public

is given the appearance in western europe, that somehow because russia is bad, the story has been put out. the russians of cutting europe off energy supplies. that's why things are bad. prices are going up and there's a place where the truth could be further from it is a lead foss entirely imposed buying the european decision makers, who sadly think and just be very keen to do what america is telling them to do. and the situation is much easier for america because once again, as we already talked about, 1415 america is saying to europe, okay, let's you guys impose sanctions on russia and let you guys in europe restrict you economies. what america is going to sit back and actually take a lot of european businesses has been going on for the last 7 years. so the real question is,

how long will europe the european population and decision makers in europe allow this us impose and devastation of the western european economy and to continue because it's entirely and unnecessary and imposed from the outside and not from east is from the west. and speaking to richard werner, professor banking and finance at the monitor the university in the u. k. many, thanks for joining us. really appreciate it. not leading well. the economic in business organizations are predicting that india's economy will continue to grow despite a global slow down. with some even suggesting the country could become the world's largest economy. over taking japan and germany. we expect that is going to be the fastest growing she 20 economy next year. but high inflation poses the downside risk to india as growth, as households and businesses have less purchase in power. inflation is the problem

in india currently and undeniably, in fact, the pain inflation, particularly, which is caused by international call prices and extreme weather patterns. in fact, around april the c r in the l. so in all time, high inflation in or what. but we are seeing only signs off it cool off. now let me also point out, but india is also at the 6 place when it comes to g, d p, amongst all g 20 countries. but the, this for example, india inflation rate is at $6.00. 7 percent, much lower than u. k. which is that 9.6 percent. well on the opposite side of the g 20 economy quote list according to the full cost by o e. c. d. india is projected to have a group 3 or 7 percent compared to yuki, which in fact, the 2nd worse before, more, after it sanctioned russia. in fact, it's not going to grow,

but it's going to shrink my 0.4 percent. but in the u. k itself, while additions tend to believe russia and not themselves for the current condition, for the current downfall in britain's economy. the last thing impacts on supply chains has made goods more expensive and fuel inflation. and this has been worsened by a made in russia energy crisis. what india hasn't sanctioned, what thought node with russia. and remember, india has overtaken britain and become the 5th largest economy in the world. and it's projected that it's brought is going to be even more substantial in the coming years. india will witness an unprecedented explosion in economic growth in opportunities from a 3 trillion dollars economy. india will grow to be a 40 trillion dollars economy by 2047 ranking among the top 3 economies of the world in your working life. and there is a can always say fans, we can see a lot of decisions going on all around the world. but you see the lot

of employment being generated on the government is taking a lot of steps in this feed. the economic growth is expected to be very high. the market is going very fast, both in consumer and it and the banking sector. so as a whole, the world economy and the nuclear me, if you company nicholas is going definitely faster than what it is. so very surprising. but it does depicting india's economic and political might be, are going ahead, the right, but, and be things article the laser, what else? it's shining example. and while india is experiencing a period of growth and development and other briggs member rush servers, hosting a 3 day gathering in some petersburg with business delegations from 50 countries, joining the blogs meeting to discuss the investment initiatives. the bricks number of states are presenting their perspective projects in the no northern russian city . the main session on friday will discuss digital developments, the increase of living standards in cities as well as some rural economic projects

. we caught up with some of the former participants who was very optimistic about the event showing him that he's with us. we see the results of the form at face value. it's happening in the right place at the right time in on this platform. russia has convincing me demonstrated it's reliability and stability, not only in the mix fair, but also in the moral spare. indeed, we have always wanted a multi polar world. and today we are already moving forward. as we see thousands of entrepreneurs forum. i mean all the chaos in the world, we are starting to follow the right path with russia going its way. the president is the flagship of this path forward. therefore, it must be supported all 1st of all by the e, a u. s. seo and break, the ha, i see it, i ha m of attend in the, in breaks from 2000 launch into 2 is to make sure that we create a link on a partnership between our companies, back in common room. and the companies are from countries of the embryo,

that's why we are here to be, to create that contract to credit partnership with most of these portions for them to come on invest in our counties and to come and pick over many business positions in our country. because the business opportunities and idea and they are very attractive opportunities. so we are expecting them to come over and to her and to propose order concrete solutions are we know that the solutions are there. now we just have to grab the opportunities and to link to partnerships and to make it happen. a democratic republic of congo, ange bewanda had agreed an immediate cease fire, and the withdrawal of the n 23. gwinnett from the congolese east talks were facilitated by former canyon president a who were can you answer? they all say as a case, we're one of supporting the rebel forces, which it denies. ortiz correspondence. corolla toddler brings his mom, an agreement between the parties has been reached to without the main instigator,

according to the new one, the summit, which is really dealing with the conflict between the democratic republic of congo and its name bar to the east, a smaller one, the nation is that from as early as friday, the 25th of november at 6 p. m. there should be a ceasefire in the east, the new part of the, the of c. now the main is the gate of the high end of the conflict and the eastern part of the d. r. c. is a rebel group called the m $23.00. chiefly, they will be focusing 1st on the m $23.00 rebels. who the d r. c. government accuses that one them government of supporting and backing. and this 5, the promises that have been made to re kenyatta by president of rwanda polka guy me to be in attendance at the summit. he was a no show,

but he had promised that he will impress appointment the m 23 rebels that they should lay down their arms and try as best as the hen who leave the occupied territories. this is not meant with a great amount of tribulation from nationals of the comb release because they claim that they are partners in this deal that they cannot fight among which are the kind and truths. and as well as the word of president polka guy me of rwanda. but here is a feeling of what some comalies nationals feel about what's happening in their home country. people on a similar plan to do what we were sitting in a camp and told to evacuate. that's why we're fleeing. they told us that m 20 free was a few meters away. we're afraid sugar units. it hurts as a lot that we'll still fling me afloat. from colombia, and now we are fleeing jensen that her mom we are now heading to go mom. we have no hope with them. we are suffering a lot to go then after guarding noise,

to say we need government assistance because we are suffering a lot. the displeased loss suffering, we have no food and a sovereign is getting worse every day. it relates receiving whether this the buyer will actually take holes. and if the m $23.00 rebels will adhere to the demands made by the regional forces and whether one of the what as long as the running conflict on the east than in though continent will actually come to a halt. cannibal if had to 40 in johannesburg the u. k. government made great financial errors in teaming up with washington to fund and ultimately fails campaign to promote democracy in afghanistan. as, according to a british watchdog, tasks by the government to monitor the foreign development aids. the report finds that the u. k. a to afghanistan, feel to achieve its primary goal of building

a viable state. and that the you case decision to prioritize. partnership with the united states led to some poor choices on the use of aid which contributed to the ultimate failure of the international coalitions state building approach. according to the report, the british government spent a total of $3500000000.00 pounds on assistance to afghanistan. however, the organization rated the u. k. actions as unsatisfactory and most areas, although with some positive results. the government has also been criticized for as cooperation with the u. s. which the report was that led to some poor choices. after withdrawing from afghanistan, the u. k. concentrated assets on ukraine, the country has already given 2300000000 pounds and military assistance to key if the purchase government is also announced that it will send helicopters to ukraine for the 1st time. it comes off the u. k. prime minister, where she's soon, i cannot stay new at defense packaged during his recent surprised trip to keith journalist actually returns, he says, the case,

main priority is to follow washington's orders. this information will not be widely widely disseminated in british media. they will be focusing on the need to support the as well, but tally of who knows, and the approach and their breakaway elements of the ukranian army. there will be nothing about corruption and how this aid money is going down the drain. we shouldn't act for him. the important thing is to worship and to the blank and state department as currently configured, and to help with britain, that's what the british population will be. should be thinking, according to the detractors of so next policy on ukraine. and as for the british public, they don't get the information the u. s. department of agriculture stays around a 1000000 turkeys have died of avian influenza this year. but officials are also