no medical reason why you should be alive. you to find something to believe. john story is a story of ho story, victory and whatever i can do to help him with top a lot of our the you can live in chief delete some post on twitter in which she claimed a 100000. you claim to thought it had been killed in the conflict. figure is 10 times more than the one. and now if you couldn't officials in oldest the team at least to believe our view, i see no reason why these these scores continues. it's in the interest of those who want to continue the lead in the old blame, blame game on russia, a any potential to nuclear war. and in an exclusive interview with all the time that is,

is the b c of deliberately distorting facts and spreading rumors to tom nation, the nation's perception in the west, as it faces protests over strict ppo bid policies. with do i, there are 3 good evening where ever you are in the world. welcome tara t. internationalists. just gone for a m here in the capital next week to have you with us. i'm right, i'm on it. let's take a look at today's top stories. the head of the commission has said that 100000 ukranian soldiers have died in the conflict. she made the claim in a video posted on twitter, which was later deleted. russia's invasion of ukraine has brought death, devastation and unspeakable suffering. we all remember the horrors of butcher it is estimated that more than 20000 civilians and more than 100000 ukrainian

military officers have been killed so far. so there are a whole lot of questions here. first, where did european commission president ursula vander line get the figure from of a 100000 ukranian troops killed in the conflict in ukraine. secondly, why were those figures so quickly deleted? not even corrected or updated, but just simply memory hold. did you catch herself out spreading fake news or something? now the commissions deputy chief spokeswoman dana spin aunt said in a later tweet that the $100000.00 killed figure should have included both killed and injured ukrainian. troops, she called the figure an external estimate. now that would have perfectly aligned with a $100000.00 killed or injured grey and soldiers that u. s. joint chiefs chairman, mark, milly cited earlier this month. okay, so then where is the clarification with the updated accurate figures?

what exactly is the source of this quote, external estimate that the you consider to be legitimate enough to have underline site in a speech, to someone at brussels, just write these speeches on their bathroom breaks or something, and then just pass it to vander lines, teleprompter person on the way back to their desk, why did russell simply delete the figures from everywhere, like the information never even existed. a spokesman for ukrainian president vladimir zalinski calls the 100000 figure extremely far from reality. ukraine's military chief had previously said that the figure of 9000 ukrainian troop lost his back in august. so why didn't you commission site that as it source, it was picked up by the western process is publicly available, just like the american estimate of the 100000. now, given the massive discrepancy between washington's estimate of ukrainian troop losses and what keeps military leadership had, pre missy conveyed them to be brussels is really in a position here to act as

a sort of tie breaker. are they just not interested in giving people an accurate depiction of the human loss and suffering that the west continues to enable with weapons and funding instead of pushing for peace negotiations? the only thing that this inexplicable backtracking does is so a lack of trust in the actions, information and motivations of european officials. one part of the chief statement that wasn't delayed did was where she said russia must pay fine lavishly the devastation that it caused the damages so far estimated by the you at 600000000000 euros. the e commission chief has also hinted at where the money could come from refugees $20.00 and we have the means to make russia pay. we have blocked 300000000000 euros of the russian central bank reserves. in the short term, we could create with our partners

a structure to manage these funds and invest them. we will then use the proceeds for ukraine, reminded me of the western responses that you know that you are against the company, that companies even pricing. they tend to stop the time that the national, my quality down for a project by orient you back and then the all from the western nation. now even the case is really about, you know, who is in the position to make a judgment, to basically be thinking what is, what is wrong. and then what is the result? what is the punishment, even energy and it's arching. so that's what i would say. you don't have that the ability and it's offering to you all the go back probably for a while. it's in order for that you have been luckily it's very difficult to make

that complex mandatory age, your cleaning brackets all t spoke to one of russia's vers senior diplomats, a deputy head of the foreign ministry in moscow. in an exclusive interview, he says the world is undergoing considerable transformations. the new points of tension emerging, but he dismisses any potential for nuclear war. this is because of the u. s. actions of that just for gas on fire. now and again, that we couldn't continue this business as usual. i recognise that russia i took the decision to postpone. ah, the already planned a regular session of bilateral consulting commission, due to be held these very days in cairo, egypt. but we did so because we couldn't just ignore ah,

what has been an ongoing attempt by the us to add a problems to the place of the c u. s. administration. the by an administration decided to halt these dialogue. i am disturbed by the fact that the very idea of a nuclear war became over time, more and more acceptable if you wish. for general public, it's in admissible in our view. i see no reason why these discourse continues. it's in interest. so those who want to stir fur further as a general sense of uncertainty and find ways how to continue this litany of blames, blame game on russia. we can not accept it. it's completely completely abs or them has nothing to do with the reality. we do believe that us and others come closer

and closer to the point when they would be regarded as parties to these conflicts. the risks associated with this evolution and development are undeniable, and i have huge and that grow we, we do not abandon needs irrespective of how our adversaries and opponents describe or interpret this just because they like us or a c, e 's collapsing as a structure. so our absence of minister law growth in lloyds is regrettable, but this is also a sign on how furious our adversary's are in terms of just destroying the fundamentals of procedures. not only the fundamental political and security architecture, but the very essence on how the international system works. oh,

china has a his, the b, b, c of the liberty to so thing, facts of tonisha nations perception in the west. so it deals with a wave of protests against strict anti cove and policies. those comments came off, the chinese authorities detained a, b, b. c reporter as a protest in shanghai. you've on your way. another remarks from the british side are a serious distortion of facts and constitute a grave interference in china's internal affairs. we firmly reject it. everything was conducted within legal procedures. this bbc journalist refused to cooperate with the police, his law enforcement efforts, and then acted as if he were a victim. the bbc immediately twist to the story and massively propagated the narrative that it's journalist had been arrested and beaten by police. while actually he was working simply to try to paint china as a guilty party. tacit china said the babies the reporter was detained for refusing

to leave the scene as it became potentially dangerous. he thought his release him after confirming his identity. they said that the journalist didn't identify himself as such until he was taken into custody birth and elements which previously opposed anti locked down protests in their own countries are now sticking out in support of the demonstrations in china. among them is canadian prime minister, just intrude of seemingly fin guessing about his own harsh stars and similar protest in his nation. just earlier this year. if you join the protest because you're tired of co vin, you now need to understand your breaking laws. we heard your frustration with cove it with the measures that are there to keep people saying we heard you. it's time to go home. where the media outlets have changed the dawns of the privacy condemning anti cove and protest than now presenting the wave of rallies in china

in a positive light. just a few months ago, popular bukosa branded those processing as a fringe minority who are opposing the general consensus. i'm how to fight the virus. says course live loud to international criminal lawyer, christopher black, based in toronto, canada. chris are great to see you here and i are to start with a, b, b, c. now, the child for mrs. accused the b, b. c, of distorting the facts. i mean, what do you make of that? they try to put china in a bad light. they're using every pretext they can to put china in a bad light because you can be rest assured that have china had relaxed all its corbett measures, and many people died in china. they would be accusing china doing nothing, protect his people. the fact is that china is trying to protect his people as best he can and using measures which were effective and are effective and which were

dropped in canada and the rest of the west in c auto process took place, which fruita was complaining about. since then, there's been no protection for the canadian people against corbett and the other virus is raging in his, in the north american continent. busy cases arising rapidly, but nothing's being done to protect people whatsoever. c so this is nothing about cobit, it's about. busy any pretext bash china on any level for whatever reason. this is jesse, how did this year know? we had the truck drivers protesting in the us, people protesting the e with low global crack down on them quickly. but when it comes to china, like you say, this is to be something different, is there a bigger play here? yes, this is, it's, they're trying to undermine the contemporary chinese government as they are trying to undermine the russian government. by supporting any, any small protests which they can den drive into something bigger to try and.

busy influence people in china against a government and try and support with the domestic populations, the anti chinese policies. they're adopting arm. i was at the 20, the g. 20 protests in toronto and 2010 where the army and the police beat thousands of people and arrested thousands and a very peaceful protest armed with that's forgotten these days. and if the i don't, i didn't see the chinese government complaining about what the canadian government did to the courts as them. c or since, so as, as i say, any, any chance they have the canadians, the americans, the british, and all the rest of nato, any pretext they can use to bash china, they're going to use it. and we can expect more of the same accuracy is just staggering, very probably indeed, playing a big role. it now some say that the processor really coordinated on tiny social media by some western agents even could that be

a possibility is quite possible. i'm, i've read about that, i'm not sure i'm not there. i don't know. but we do know from the hearings in ottawa about the protester took place here in ottawa, that her american money was used to, to fund some of the projects groups which are very right wing and were. and if colby was actually approach a pretext to read to room, embarrassed the government by right wingers here, the american influences. and then the government actually didn't crack down on the project here until the americans force them to. so as a very complex that. busy situation taken place in canada, but the hypocrisy is nevertheless, quite apparent. an o canada is now released as new china policy, which is riddled with rhetoric of anti china hostility, which has been going on since the arrested mang juan ju, on trumped up charges several years ago. and held her for 2 years or illegally in canada. and they've been doing the same with chinese here ever since. since her

seeing such a powerful country like china, owns a lot of the debt on many countries. and yet, at this antique china movements interesting, incisive women letters of a black, thank you so much for joining me here. artie was a pleasure to live usa. thanks again for your time. you're welcome. credit. one out jeremy's present has said that a peace deal between russia and ukraine would be an act of injustice. the freezing, the convert would only solidify the gains that russian trains have already made. and he calls for a cease fire now, and not serious, because at the moment a truce would mean, in fact, recognition of the injustice that is already occurred. sci fi now would mean that russia will keep the occupied territories. this means that borders have been violated. international law is being violated and land is being seized and all this will be allowed. kiera has been de la, knew that nato countries increase weaponry,

supplies the crane's war effort. the u. s. a. loan has sent nearly $20000000000.00 of met v 8, the ukraine, and the european commission has announced it will send another $18000000000.00 euros and assistance this coming year. a former assistant secretary of the us treasury says e countries have been following americas lead on the ukraine conflicts washington and you are responsible for the war. and so. ready if there's blame it rested on their shoulders, wester's thoroughly involved it so widen. the warrant doesn't want to let go of it, because it's a source of permanent propaganda against russia. and if you, if your government has the goal, that is, if the american government has the goal of our world, hey, germany, the more discomfort and pressure and stress it can create in moscow,

the better. so, don't expect that the west to see you frayne is anything by a way of demonizing, russia, and pressuring russian, this german chancellor or whatever he is. he, he's a, a paul for washington. he doesn't represent the german people any more than they hear you commissioner represents your band people. all of these people have been car washington's embarrasses the end of world war 2. when you, she reports that german industry is having to flee germany because of no energy. they're coming to america and you see this type of thing. you sometimes wonder. c how much punishment the germans will except for being a empower so there is that sort of oh,

on the other hand these european leaders are probably very well paid and they look after their own interest long before they look after the country's interest the vote ahead of the disgrace, so current things change f t x addressed allocations of helping ukraine. rwanda money, the u. s. i think policy surprisingly, he says he wishes he could have done that. i, i believe in the all day i'll be you free monitor funds for the democratic party. i don't why you print wandering funds are you, i don't know which ones are wandering. i really whole direction. i was part of the internet and the back of the world's 2nd largest cryptograms insurance until it suddenly lost billions of dollars leaving its investors out to dry the pharmacy. it

was a major backer of the list of i think, party media reports, raise questions about the puzzle. money little written black eve. ukraine has denied the claims cooling them. conspiracy theories, but the world's richest via the law says, quote, it's a question, was asking that goes live now. so one of my favorite guess, lionel, he legal and that mean the alice joining us now from new york line. always a pleasure to see now ribbons of this and t x. loan money from here to the democratic party, causing court to stir. what do you make of this 1st interview by sam franklin? them read. so they write me a free thinker. yes. well, bank went bankruptcy. you do the, the pun of your, of your selection. this is, has to be one of the most ill conceived of moves on anybody's part. i'm a lawyer my profession and you always tell your client shot up. now,

when you are somebody, so printer, naturally weird and strange and odd and dismissive as, as to be f regarding f t x and f t g. let's get our initials correct. what you're doing is you're making yourself a bigger target. now let me say something you alluded to something, my friend will you use the word? conspiracy theory, translation. true. whatever something is 100 percent. correct? you only catch flack when you're over the target. you're a conspiracy theorist. oh congratulations. let me give you the worst possible scenario, which has yet to be proved. if indeed he was a part of a of apes laundering scheme, funnel links aim, some international conspiracy to find either democratic candidates or awe frame. you versus this could be the biggest, should get

a crime ever investigated bigger than enron, bigger than our own. bernie made off bigger than anything you can imagine. this is, this knows both. well, and we're just getting to the, to the surface level of this. you also have somebody and i can say this enough and it means a lot here in this country. he has no jury appeal. he is weird. he has come to us as this woke, left dis, demented. he's into affective altruism. i'm sure you've heard this. he's not doing it for the profit he wants to give everything away. and what's happening is that for the 1st time in a long time, citizens are looking to find out women who is this person and who are these people, and what is this crypto and where's the government? and when you hear, because if you hear his interview, he said that was an oversight. i don't know how do you much,

but at the x account basically to to, to fund your lavish lifestyle and then claim some accounting oversight. i mean the man, there's not enough room, he's hanging up. so this is gonna be the biggest thing you've ever seen it online. okay. i mean, i know you get excited and i love your passion. i. whenever we talk with lewis, look at it. i mean, he's denied it. he's been asked about it. can be slow without fire. and can we see that the does this denial really mean anything? or is it just something that he doesn't maybe try to kick the problem or in a kick the can down the road as we say? absolutely not. ah, he's coming across as though he's, he's extended a to far beyond the skis that he made some a county errors. let me explain in another way. there are millions of ways

for you to incur criminal liability, civil liability and to find yourself in a position you can imagine. what also is human nature is that when somebody is grabbed by certain tender parts of the anatomy, they start to squeal. and this is not somebody who has the wherewithal, and the temerity to withstand this scrutiny to him. when you look at his initial interviews, it's almost like a game. he doesn't understand this. it's like this weird juvenile detachment when he is put under fire. and with a new democratic, excuse me, and you had a republican leadership in the house looking for their next scalp if he is the one who is theoretically, again, yet to be proved. connected with basically funding ukrainian operations under the table and bankruptcy causing trillions of dollars to just disappear.

watch what happens when you have someone by the heart, their heads and hearts will follow. and that is not hyperbole. before i get to the full, the, the, the legality of crypto goes in and maybe regression. but before i get there, if we look into a little bit deeper, if we look at the money going from a cave back to the democratic party or i don't, i don't know how, how does the laundry? i mean, is it like the democratic part is sending money over the keys to help them on their thing while we're gonna buy crypto currency on the f t x. and you can get the money back is, is that how the laundering system work? i, it works on a variety different possible theories that could be one. again, this is yet to be proved, but we, other people have been asking when moneys are allocated for war effort? is there in a county word is that even go, who knows?

you know, remember in a, to our system of laws, you don't necessarily have to actually effectuate laundry laundering. i should say, as long as your intention was criminal, we have conspiracy laws we have aiding and abetting an accomplice that you, if you and i agree to do something, which is a legal and we never actually do it. we've broken the law that is a comp conspiracy to commit something. so you don't necessarily even have to go through it for you to be criminally. culpable. ok. let's look at the, the room. the regulation group to conceal crim toes f t x is all or you know, these exchanges, these bitcoin, the non regulated do they have to offer to anybody? i mean, should they be regulated? oh, absolutely. the 1st problem is, is that nobody really understand what it is. let me go back. i don't know if you remember this or if this was a big story for you. but we had

a fraud in this country called fair, and i was there was a woman named elizabeth holmes who made the most preposterous claims ever regarding the ability to detect cancer from a single drop of blood. it was read dead gillis and all of silicon valley came on board. everybody from kissinger to billionaires, rupert murdoch, they forgot money. so you, you could have all the regulation you want, but as long as you have human beings and please forgive me, who are stupid enough to jump into something they don't understand, caught up in this weird moravian, as long as that happens, you can have all the right, you, elation you weren't. there are people who were wiped up. let me also say something very quickly. if what i'm hearing is correct, the people who were wiped out this is a veritable who's, who of you know, who it wait until it hits the fan. okay,

so all right, so if we, we know, i know that story, i think she was recently convicted for some movie was in the head. i was just a few days ago, but no, legally speaking, i mean that is the whole bitcoin a scam. i mean, do people really know, but i know you said what is it really, but is there a way, is a way to so like help balance or people that don't want to be involved with bags to maybe what, you know, hire their money or i'm just confused about the whole thing really well, does you sound like they did in the tulip craze? in 1634. the idea is that you have a block chain. the idea is that you do not have to be dependent upon a central bank. individuals we create our own sense of currency, we don't need to have a central bag, determine what it is worth. it can be used theoretically to wander,

to hide for all types of illegal activities or regular commerce. the idea is spawned by this idea of alternative and alternative currencies. you know, we live in a world right now of d eyes and e as geez. and again, let me also tell you what, believe it or not, what was this young man's drawing power? was this thing called effective altruism, this hippy dippy left d. i'm sorry, this idea of we are the world where people can make money for, for good causes. but for reasons for no other reason than the fact that people just like it because it was cool. they jumped on it, but there is a lot to this. this does make sense. this is a sound and potentially wonderful alternative means of exchanges. and i like, i don't wanna, i love it. i, you know,

everything by everything. it's fantastic. clearly, this is to go out, one thing, it was this guy linked to the democratic policy. i mean, there's a little bit by the politics on a i, i wasn't given favors or i didn't, i will is i could the i though i don't want to keep adding more conspiracy theories out there. but clearly, wow, is a getting favor to the democratic party. i mean, is he helping them out in some way? i mean, why the democrats, what will 1st of all, please don't ever be a detective. don't ever apologize for following something that's obvious. he himself, by virtue of what he is saying, a spouse is exactly the same mindset of many democrats and many people who are the entertainment business luck. get him. this is this he is. they fell in love. he's the kim carr dash he had known of finance. that's one thing. number 2, when you are giving money to any party that does

a tremendous amount in and tried to, to court favor with them. so just so happened. he might be a democrat himself and were to he, he has been bank rolling and he claims as well to be fair republicans as well. so he's of the same ideology. he has a bank roll them and he then turned to the same people as, as, go ahead now regulate me. investigate me. me who has been writing checks. i mean it's, it's perfect. and you're worried about a conspiracy very big and it's, it's beyond that is obvious. there's, there's no scull dougherty here, i mean, but here's the thing. remember i'm telling you this, this is going to go away so fast. something is going to come up in the next 2 to 3 days where people are sick. because number one is not low hanging fruit enough is a little wank ish. it.