sponsored with a, with headlines this, our china hughes is the b, b. c of deliberately just built in flags and spreading rumors that punish the nation's perception. the west as it faces protests over strict cove and policies. bronson says it will maintain truth in book, you know, for this quite violent protest against the continued ministry president of the former colonial power in the west african country. the french are going through all the means to take control to dominate us. we no longer trust them if africa wants

to save itself, this has to be done by africans. first italian lawmakers cause amendment that would have permitted funding weapon richie claim without parliamentary approval. they say shit with by parliament with good afternoon. good evening where ever you are in the world. welcome to ortiz and actually just gone. 6 am here in the russian capital, and it's great. so have you with us. i'm rather mommy. let's take a look at today's top stories. china has accused the bbc of deliberately distorting facts to tarnish the nation's perception in the west that deals with the wave of protest, strict antique over policies. those comments came off, the chinese authorities detained a, b, b. c reporter of protest in shanghai involving you were your none. the remarks from the british side are a serious distortion of facts and constitute

a grave interference in china's internal affairs. we firmly reject it. everything was conducted within legal procedures. this pbc journalist refused to cooperate with the police, his law enforcement efforts, and then acted as if he were a victim. the bbc immediately twisted the story and massively propagated the narrative that it's journalist had been arrested and beaten by police. while actually he was working simply to try to paint china as a guilty party. so i said the babysitter of order was detained for refusing to leave the c as it became potentially dangerous. the authority to release him after confirming his identity, they said the jealous didn't identify himself as such until he was taken into custody. western governments which previously opposed anti lockdown protests in their own countries. and now speaking out in support of the demonstrations in china among them, if canadian prime message just intruder, similarly forgetting about his own harsh thongs against similar protests in his

nation earlier this year. if you join the protest, because you're tired of colvin, you now need to understand your breaking laws. we heard your frustration with cove it with the measures that are there to keep people saying. we heard you. it's time to go home now. where the media outlets have changed their thoughts of the previous he can demi anti cove progress than that wasn't in the way of rallies in china, in a positive light. just a few months ago, popular broadcast, branded the processing as a fringe minority who are opposing the general consensus on how to fight the virus . we heard from inserted criminal lawyer, christopher black in canada. he says it's common for the western media to show china in a bad light. they're using every pretext they can to put china in

a bad light. because you can be rest assured that of china had relaxed, honest corbett measures. and many people died in china. they were be accusing china doing nothing protect as people. the fact is that china is trying to protect his people as best it can and using measures which were effective and are effective. they're trying to undermine the, can't the chinese government as they are trying to undermine the russian government by supporting any, any small protests which they can den, drive into something bigger, to try and influence people in china against the government and try and support with the domestic populations, the anti chinese policies are adopting. i didn't see the chinese government complaining about what the canadian government did to the processes them or since. so as, as i say, any, any chance they had, the canadians, the americans, the british, and all the rest of nato. any pretext they can use to bash china they're going to use it and we can expect more of the same to her policy. it's just staggering. the

pentagon has claimed that china is attempting to a road us influence in the asia pacific region by drawing attention to the chaotic us withdrawal from afghanistan last year. in 2021. the peoples republic of china employed multiple diplomatic tools in an attempt to erode u. s. and partner influence, such as highlight in the u. s. withdraw from afghanistan, and criticizing us backed security partnerships people's republic of china, officials and state media outlets also repeatedly condemned the u. s withdrawal from afghanistan incited to withdraw as evidence that the u. s. is an unreliable partner and declining power. cs withdrawal with one of the defining moments of recent history, often 20 years of his manager operation in afghanistan, the pentagon quit in the face of a taliban advance and left behind thousands of people who had been helping the u. s

. army over thee is a bomb attack brian isis linked group at the curb level. as people were trying to flee killed a nissan sits, the civilians and 13 u. s. marines by some media outlets have described the us pull out from our fence on as a disaster. republican lawmakers have been putting the blame squarely on the button administration. the biden administration repeatedly misled the american people about the real situation on the ground in cobble issuing public statements that were in direct opposition to the internal reports being sent by the state department and u. s. military. at one point, the state department spokesperson net price was encouraging people to make their way to the airport and telling the press, the evacuation was efficient and effective. but the apple gates were closed, and internal memos were talking about how there were too many dead bodies at the airport. and they don't know how to deal with all of them. for the i a, a al,

it's larry johnson says, the u. s. is trying to justify aggressive little stance against china. the reality as united states can do very little to stop china. if china decided to be that kind of aggressive, let's call them an expeditionary military force. the fact of the matter is for the last 30 years, there's only one country that has consistently been involved with experts at expeditionary military, in counters, sending their troops overseas to occupy other countries. that's the united states. what, what, what this document provides. you got to have an enemy be got to have it well defined at it. but then when you look at it from an economic standpoint, what you see is that the united states is wanting to cultivate, has it's embed economically with the chinese on a variety of fronts, from the national basketball association. eli bus with tesla,

apple. so that's why it gets a frantic it's, it's really pulling into different directions. on the one hand, china has to be presented as is the worst and ever, on the other hand it's, it's a lucrative market. the united states wants to take advantage of france has insisted it will keep troops in bikini faster to fight terrorism. just one reason why i'm protest against the continued military presence of a former colonial power in the west african nation. several western african countries have been looking to full net own collectively few fools under the so called aqua initiative to combat terrorist groups. if i say 0 to receive 2002 from neighboring countries, including ivory coast nisha and gone out to fight against insurgency last month, problems officially ended its own 8 emergency operation that had been tossed with

eradicating terrorism in the region. laguna also interviewed residents on what they think. oh, the security issues, the aqua in the city. so years it was created an initiative of come to his overcoat gun law, been so good and could do was go on to speak by sending hoops and equipment. this copy of his aho, stopping by book, you know, possibly an immediate neighbor waive up running to sin who for the military right now. 10th of them late nipples to hear the handle phrased, behind was clear, shallow. this 4th member of a quiet and shitty as barbaric candle for his release closed as do 5 ahead is almost beds day. simply it's a bit dubious. i'm skeptical because burkina faso is not the only country in an emergency situation. i think the initiative should come through the economic community of west african states,

or it should concern all the countries affected by terrorism. france could be a shareholder of the a cry initiative in the process, but to them with the french are going through all domains to take control, to dominate us, to present themselves as a guide and protect them. they know that since molly lived g 5, so how it grew became non switch. we no longer trust them pay. people now have eyes open and if france doesn't change its way of dealing with people with our states, i would say they're not welcome. 5000000, but some book you might be believes in this are caught in shits eve, african countries supporting an outlook on country. thus buffer. no doubt, it will be success long to host with i think it's a good initiative. we feel a climate of solidarity between african countries. thank god. the initiative is coming from ghana and thank god ganna is not a francophone country. so we can believe that france doesn't have a full control of gonna, and we don't have to worry about it. it's a good initiative because we were told that if africa wants to save itself,

this has to be done by africans. first western countries are not done yet with africa in the south of the sahara. no doubt. they are going to explore many ways to re colonize their last territories for vis. experts and politics. also editorial is of the newspaper. livin mom. read his mom to learn from the across, initiative masculine speak with you. when coastal countries like ghana ivory coast been in and togo, realised the terrorism was heading to the coast. they were considering burkina faso as a rampart. but this rampart was not able to contain that progress. we waited a long time for concrete things, but to day, as the fire is burning and there is the threat of terrorism. it's really time to update this project because it's a question of existence for these countries in sort of 2000 soldiers already waiting. it's good, but will the funds come from online resources? if they are going to still wait for hypothetical support from our traditional partners? i have doubts. but the question now is, you know, if walk in

a fossil will accept rip troops from his neighbors or willoughby country, do like money. oh boy, caught it the leading of our crop and did it. at sammy's, a european secured heal, denies asian of which russia is a member, has prohibited. several russian corresponds from covering a high level meeting, coney, and the way in poland. this is a blatant act of political censorship and a flagrant violation of o. s. c commitments. we demand the speedy restoration of the russian correspondence accreditation and a strong response from the l i. c representative on freedom of the media. theresa ribeiro. one of the o. s. c e. 's main principles is to uphold freedom of the press. the organization even has a specific protocol thing. the inch issuance of janice could the accreditation

should not be manipulated for controlling content all sanctioning. a member sate also believes that the organization violated those rules when the polish authorities, organization, organizing the event decided to withhold accreditation for the russian journalists . poland has also refused to allow russian for mr. sega leverage to attend the same event, also as cool that decision, unprecedented and entirely incompatible poland currently holding the o. s. c e chairmanship. days earlier, poland also refused a grant. russian parliament members, visas to attend the o i. c. e. assembly rushes delegation will be headed by the countries permanent representative to the o. s. c. throughout the ongoing council. best cross live now to radio host. kerry harrison carries great to have you with us here in

our t. now the a c. e doesn't really matter what it stands for, but it was founded and includes 57 countries. and one of their mandates is freedom of seat speech. i mean, this is the european union. we told her, i mean, these are the guys that invented freedom of speech and now we have this. no, russia can't come in. no russian journalist can come in. what kind of message is this really sending? well, let me be typically american and say we invented freedom of speech back in the late 17 hundreds when fighting king george and establishing our constitution. but the europeans, after world war 2 became much more open to our way of life. let me read because you're exactly right here. what the european union says under its laws, everyone has the right to freedom of expression. this rights shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive an impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. that means every one

gets to play in the sandbox. you have a camera microphone, a pen, and a pencil. you're supposed to be there. so this is a problem. yeah, isn't it? i mean, odd t, as he noted, sense it in many countries, the low we know people use the peons these days. i mean, but what do you think west, some past fears as an alternative missiles? well, an alternative news source offers alternative information to the official information . i think every country has this problem, whether you're in russia, whether you're in china, whether you're in the united states or cuba or venezuela doesn't really matter. if there's going to be a certain theme that is repeated, that is in the interest of your covenant and the people that own the media who function at the pleasure of the government allowing them to do so. and so it becomes a problem when there is other information that might tease provoke somebody into different thinking, asking questions which could be forbidden in certain countries. so why would we,

the united states that have spent 5000000000 dollars on ukraine, for instance? going back to ned and e d, you can look that up. it's super easy. you find that we have invested so much in ukraine to be able to put us businesses in and other things. and we have a story to tell if somebody is challenging that story and changing that story, that we have to explain what we were doing to begin with. this is neither good nor bad. it's just what's coming into play here, especially now in poland, which is linking up with nato and is obviously following the will of not the european union. but i would imagine the united states. that's what i interesting. now if we kind of take a step back here, this meeting could have been a perfect time for maybe back room talks to 3 made bring a resolution to the region. i mean, in your opinion, what benefits if any, does the o s. c e view from keeping this conflict alive. well, ah,

regrettably, and we all know this is intuitive. i think to many of us and smedley, butler, a famous u. s. general. set it after world war one. war is a racket. people get rich, if you're making hats, band aids, helmets, uniforms, wool, gloves, rubber, eye glasses, whatever it is in the world. you're suddenly making a lot of them for every single person, every single side of a war. those people want this to continue. it's a fact we know it, in fact they've been bragging about it publicly on wall street here in this country . and certainly is a lot of europeans that benefit from having this perpetual war. if, as everyone is saying they really want to have peace, then you have to allow that piece to happen in a public place. if you block certain people from covering it, well then maybe what you're saying is you really don't want peace. i mean, that's how else does one interpret that and it is very worry and he does hope that they come to their senses. i'll sit down, i'm have a chat and

a talk. so like civilized people radiate who's carry harrison. i was a pleasure, so thank you so much for joining us here and see. love talking to you. thanks again for your time, my friend. but this is on now. lawmakers, an aide. so member anthony have pushed back against sending more weapon me. do you claim they cancelled an amendment that would have allowed on supplies to give without parliamentary approval? as they say, the parliament must authorize every single shipment. auntie contributor mitchell madison tells us more. looks like we're seeing the 1st signs of a shift and public opinion on weapons supplies to keith actually impacting on the behavior of a western government. so there may just be hope for democracy yet. maybe italy's prime minister george or maloney's rightly coalition was elected largely on a populist domestic agenda. maloney immediately went gaga for ukrainian president

vladimir zalinski all over twitter as soon as she was elected. but her coalition partners aren't on the same page. our position is clear. we feel that peace negotiations are needed at this time. countries like the u. s. continue to supply the ukrainians. i don't think this is the priority at the most powerful weapon. a woman diplomacy, not missiles and warheads. i'm counting on no more talk of sending weapons but of sending diplomats. so what do italians? what well, you think that would be the only thing that really mattered if you were running the country of you know, italy mainly. they want to be able to pay the bills for their basic needs. a mid rising energy and inflation. and the state is already spending around $5000000000.00 euros a month to offset those household costs, which maloney considers unsustainable. no sign that she considers the cost of the ukraine conflict for italy unsustainable though. but it seems that the italian people have figured out that sending more weapons is exacerbating their own

problems. just 39 percent of italians support their government's continued weapons supplies to ukraine. that's according to a recent european opinion poll and the streets in italy tell a similar story with thousands of citizens and trade unions testing or any of this month. your volume at all. what i want to say is stop giving ukraine weapons. let's start peace negotiations. that is the only way to end the conflict. i run with those. if you can let people pay for the costs of conflict, does the governments to start the conflict, but it is always the people who buy the price as to what i mean. the major european countries are scrambling to strengthen their arsenals. i don't think they should do this pieces the priority, but obviously they are not doing this for piece calls for democracy over weapons. have been ramping up recently in the west. the u. s. joint chiefs chairman mark, milly said earlier this month that ukraine should head to the negotiating table before winter sets in some prominent republicans also made negotiations over more

weapons, a wedge issue. and the recent mid term elections in which the g o. p one back control of congress. so while maloney might want to personally back salinity, her governing coalition is nonetheless supposed to be democratically accountable to the people voted the men. and the tug of war that we're now seeing within the italian government suggests that some lawmakers might actually be interested in listening to what their own citizens want. in like the story, nearly 200 passing in civil society groups have written to the international criminal court in the hague, demanding legal action against israel over its treatment of parsons. the letters highlighted. the designation of 6 past was asians as terrorists by israel, as well as later reigns on their headquarters. israel accused them of operating as part of

a network run by the popular front for the liberation of palestine and left. this group considered as terrorist by israel and western powers. the civil society grows but pendent, the letters have called on the courts, condemned moves by israel and further scrutinize his actions in palestine. they also urged the issuing of statements de money. israel stopped practices which according to the palestinians, are human rights violations. we discussed this with general director of the passing group that signed one of the letters when we send our letter to the court just to encourage them to move. that's the issue because to disagree us, and it's not the 1st time to be honest with you. we have been under smith campaigns for the last 15 years. we said to them, you have to use also to come out, you know, just to defend. also your partner, as i see and you do this and in your statute,

this is called the preventive. a preventive statement, or preventive cold or something like that. you have to do this. you can't keep silent. another think is about also the victims fall, assign has been a good a, an internationally crime scene so long. and you haven't, you move one practical step and you haven't taken any specific action like, no warranty, as for instance, against li criminals. this is what we say. we said euro or justice delayed. justice denied. that's what we said, present my record of so i see about digital currency. brazilian law makers have approved a framework for using crypto currencies in the country. as

a payment method. the move will still need the ratification of the present, but if approve, the people will be able to buy goods and services as well as hold crypto currencies as an investment offense. however. 3 it will not be considered an official legal tender. brazil already has a prominent trip to economy with resilience acts of exchanging digital coins such as bitcoin. we heard from crypto conceal entrepreneurs, chris ems who says big client chemist is economic development in latin america and diversify away from dependence on the us dollar. the whole point of the what we call the so called crypto economy. is there anyone anywhere in the well can participate in it? we, the basis of the technology is an ability for people to transact all around the world and make it borderless and free and also very, very cheap. which is why developing nations like brazil, credit cards,

he still has a very significant place within their economy. you know, we're looking looking at every economy really in any developing nation. we've got a very big problem now, which is really the real problem is this microcosm, which is the stagnation of the u. s. dollar for obvious reasons that we're all experiencing now. the way the crypto comes in, that is like the most well known cryptic on see big, you know, i was a big one, is digital go because i finite amounts of big points. you know, most currencies, including the us dollar used to be based on something called the gold standard. right. so for every dollar that was in circulation, you know, that was supposed to show us that there was a bar of gold in the vault. really that could be an absolute saving grace for brazil. we've seen this with another last american economy. el salvador central america. in this case where, you know, they've made a huge transition towards holding a lot of big coin within that government. so really, this could be a transition for the whole of latin america to really adopt that say, i don't, big coin is that gold standard, which, you know, which we predict when you know,

change fundamentally the way in which those currencies operate in the way those governments seem to be, you know, b, b liquid solvent because over so whole digital, gold in the us doesn't look so bright thompson, major crypto contractors, f t x. because of a former, theo is now address obligations of helping you claim a lot of money for the u. s stuff i think policy is admitted that he would have liked to have done such a thing. i wish i believe in the goal of it. i don't think you fremont funds for the democratic party. i you prince, wandering funds for them. i know which one the wandering i bring the whole direction. and then i was part of the internet security back as yes was the world's 2nd largest crypto current since changed into that suddenly lost

billions of those leaving investors out to dry. the former c o wasn't me to back out of the us democratic party. media reports raise questions about the possible money laundering via heave. ukraine has denied the things cooling them, conspiracy theories, but the world riches ma'am. a la musk says, quote, is a question. we're asking, we heard from you as a legal, i me the alas lionel he says the democratic party is ties with the f t x founder are obvious. and the middle of the allegations are just scratching the service when you are giving money to any party that has a tremendous amount in end tried to, to court favor with the so just so happened. he might be a democrat himself in virtue, he has been bank rolling and he claims as well to be fair republicans as well. so he's of the same ideology. he has

a bank roll them and he then turns to the same people as, as, go ahead now regulate me, investigate me. me who has been writing checks. i mean it's, it's perfect. and you're worried about a conspiracy very it's, it's, it's beyond that is obvious. there's, there's no scull dugger, we hear, i mean, but here's the thing. remember i'm telling you this, this is going to go away so fast, but in other sectors involved financial and otherwise, this is going to be the biggest unraveling that anybody has ever seen. because you haven't even gotten to the, to the, the 1st level of this. well, next of the cost of everything looks up. the cost of winter will be here again, low. are totally out with

i am, my name is frank from a reserves and philadelphia got in the room in the age of 13, going on 14 to we were violent towards those people because we believe that we're in this race. we're here 1st and this is our country being part of that movement. i got your sense of power. when i felt powerless, we got attention when i felt invisible, him accepted when i felt level the life after hey, is an organization that was founded by poor skinheads not see white supremacists in the u. s. in canada. and they found each other and they knew that they wanted to help other guys get out. was 2 parts to getting out of a violent extremist group. the 1st part of disengagement which is where you leave the social group. and then the next part is d. radicalization we're belief systems

audiology are removed. it was very impactful when someone finally came along with no fear, no judgement, you heard my story did nothing to challenge it. validate with i does these are the federal discrepancy, whole gone.