you know, we're looking looking at every economy really in any developing nation. we've got a very big problem now, which is really the real problem is it's my problem, which is the stagnation of the us. all that for obvious reasons that we're experiencing now. the way the crypto comes in that take the most well known cryptic, i see big, you know, i would say big digital gulf because the amount of big points, you know, most comments. he's including the us, all that used to be based on something called the gold standard. right. so every dollar that within circulation, you know, there was supposed to show us that there was a bar of gold in the ball. really, it could be an absolute saving grace for brazil. we've seen that with another last american economy. el salvador, central america. in this case where, you know, they've made a huge transition towards holding a lot of big coin within that government. so really, this could be a transition for the whole of latin america to really adopt adult bitcoin, a big gold standard, which, you know, which we predict would change fundamentally the way in which those currencies

operate. in the way those governments seem to be be, be liquid solvent. while they're out of this news, ours always great to have you with us back of the top of the hour, more top stories in the meantime. check out all t dot com for more international news. mm ah a . so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy even foundation, let it be in arms. race is on offense. very dramatic development. only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successfully, very difficult time to sit down and talk

with a really long that they have written for the most part. the summer's warren with the bill was then yeah, like i'm on that single dental but a deep nozzle. but in point additional full and i would at last but i had i like that mission with policy daily mother started at that. my idea what i did well, that's edible up. it's like let me love it mostly for fun. with like, got your got to replace for dealership or whatever. so when you go to meeting, you do so there's also the up, i'll say no problem or go lose ball supposedly i

mean, you could or the army got them on the road from you guys mentioned with grave on you have to run it almost ah, deputy foreign minister, you're most welcome to the program. can we begin with the stalls negotiations on reducing nuclear weapons? do you agree? the new star treaty could be a significant step, not only towards reviving broader arms control talks between russia and the u. s, but perhaps also towards enhanced overall communication with washington at this 10th time. why were they postponed? number one to lisa on our aren't we have never stopped any of the

talks? aw, ah, any forms of dialogue. otherwise, beyond the talks white country, we underscore, and on the line, ah, all the time, our redness to continue from the point where this u. s. administration, the by an administration decided to halt these dialogue. it happens ah, after our special media variation started without any explanation whatsoever, unilaterally, ah, and this is it, ah, the, you start country to this a continues to be implemented. this is an important tool that ensure predictability and sustainability. all the remains of what earlier was quite sophisticated, complicated,

and functional architecture of arms control in the world. but now we only have probably these bilateral treaty that limits the most dangerous or nuclear weapons of strategic reach. but it functions because apart from inspections that the attract that much of attention, both in washington and elsewhere as we understand there is a great deal of other means how to insure visibility or was going on in this area for both sides. now i recognise that m a russia, i to decision to postpone. ah, the already planned a regular sessional, bilateral consult of commission. due to be held these very days in cairo, egypt. but we need so because we couldn't just ignore ah,

what has been an ongoing attempt by the us to add a problems to the plate. and deb, undeniably the overall situation in and around ukraine and around new territories of russia. rob is so difficult, troubling, and in many ways ah, this is because of us actions of that just for gas on fire. now and again that we couldn't continue this business as usual. but the moments a u. s. wants to come back to the table and resume strategic security dialogue with russia. we will be there. ah. on the other hand, that aids are away too premature for me to predict. when

a russia will come back with val turns if dates for best possible bilateral consulting commission meeting ah, in any case, lease is not going to happen right away. ah, and i have my doubts in regard to possibility to do so. before christmas, before new year, it was rumored that during recent talks in an cra deputy foreign minister between russia and the u. s. that then you, as she was raised, can you perhaps tell us a little more about that discussion you heard before from russian. my ranking officials, but this contacts a was a very close to one. ah, i am not supposed to dwell on any of the details with respect to what was discuss what was not discussed there. and he said that i would also offer you a point on how we see our public messaging on the part or washington. this is

troubling because i as ever and as this happens all the time. and as it happened many times in the past, despite old understandings that we have something delicate, sensitive, something that should not be disclosed despite all this, washington leaks, and also portrays i situation in a manner that suits or eats, interests. bab, for instance. ah, we have several messages of substantial character on their part though view as high ranking officials on what transpired in ankara. i will limit my comments further to the sand ah, only to state that in some important aspects of these messages are not exactly compatible with our knowledge. how this meeting

went on and what was discussed their terms like nuclear, a war on world war 3 were increasingly hearing that both in the media and on a government level. what's the purpose of that? who benefits from this type of aggressive rhetoric? i truly regret that these happens ah, ah, more broadly apart from my, the immediate situation in the media and i, in public discourse these weeks and months. ah, i am disturbed by the fact bad them. the very idea of a nuclear war became over time. more and more acceptable if you wish for general public this, this is one of the dangerous consequences of how new generations that never

experienced any of the wars and troubles associated with this. and take it very in a very like a light way in a very laid back manner as if we're talking here on something similar to a computer game. ah, this is dangerous. i and the, it's in admissible him our of you or rush us part. we stay very firm with both what is spelled out in our military doctrine and other relative is for men's. and that's a has to do with this very important than central essential issue. the one that fundamentally on the pins on national security. but we also fully subscribe to the formula, which was coin several they decades ago on the fact that nuclear war

and not be one and thus should not be fought ah, as late as junior this year, these famous formula was reconfirmed once again. now on a collective basis by all nuclear powers, so cold p 5. and we were gratified with the ways how counterparts, how a partners and our opponents worked together to send this message out to the broad public, to them through the world. ah, on november 2nd, a russia once again sent out an important message, informal press statement by the foreign minister, you from here, from this very building. ah, to explain once again where we are. so i see no reason why these, these scores continues. it's in interest of those who want to stir fur further on

the general sense of uncertainty and find ways how to continue this litany of blames, blame game on russia. we can not accept it. it's completely completely absorbed them has nothing to do with the reality. you mentioned in the last number of days that the situation iran, ukraine, has no influence over the nuclear deterrence. i believe that's right. what i'm saying. but it's in contrast to western views, what we're hearing, who try and tie up ukraine and nuclear issues together. can you maybe elaborate a little on that? there is simply no connection between the 2. we see situation in ukraine unfolding, ah, in a disturbing manner because of us and so called like minded allies and some others ah, beside to they decided so and they continue to implement this decision,

ah, to all for ever broader forms of assistance to ukraine in order to inflict so called strategic defeat upon russia, this is the hugest strategic miscalculation ever made by western governors, a governments and western elites. russia will never be defeated. russia will sustain the course and old goals and objectives of this special military operation will be achieved. this is a very from ah, unwavering result by our political leadership. ah, the whole government and the russian people, the people of russia. ah, having said that, i would underscore, that there is meaningless to discuss and debate. ah, what a possible relation. ah hypothetical use of nuclear weapons may

have ah, over the situation in ukraine. again, there is no other way. but to see these as effectual statement on my part, ah, that is ah no 1st use of nuclear weapons apart from 2 highly hypothetical scenarios described fully and completely, ah, in a very, in ambiguous form, in our military doctrine, the one we want the 1st narrow ease this scenarios, hypothetical aggression against russia, with use of nuclear weapon or other weapons of mass destruction. and the 2nd one, aggression against russia, ah, with use of conventional weapons. ah, that takes form where a very existence of the rational state is in jeopardy. otherwise,

there is no possibility for us to consider the use of nuclear weapons, as you see as you easily imagine and conclude that it has nothing to do with the current situation in ukraine crushes foreign ministry has said multiple times that the u. s. is increasingly close to becoming a party in the conflict in at ukraine. don bos, through its weapons, supplies to key of us veterans, private contractors. they have been at documented, widely fighting against russian troops. so is america actually not a party in the conflict? and are you concerned that endless declarations from moscow without any real follow up will be seen as toothless on perhaps a sign of weakness globally? first of all, ah, i disagree with the idea that there is no follow on. ah, much happens behind the scenes. much happens in terms on how we configure own

military posture and what we do in terms of our military planning and our actual tactics. this is not for a foreign service officer like myself to discuss and debate about. i know what i am telling here about number 2 on my part. yes, we do believe that us and others come closer and closer to the point when they would be regarded as parties through these conflicts. the risks associated with this evolution and development are undeniable and a huge and they're growing. but we all so ah, act in our pronouncements, in the most responsible manner. we understand and appreciate that such a statement may have not on lee political but legal and other consequences. so we measure our pronouncements with great care. i know these days when people

are more inclined to send and receive simple messages, ah, such a game one, as we said, ah, in our part of the world in the diplomatic world, shades and nuances such game is probably not the most popular one. but we do not abandon needs irrespective of how our adversary's and opponents describe or interpret this just because they don't like us. we do so deliberately not to always stretch our own messaging. and also let me be very frank, to maintain a great deal of flexibility on how to configure our further action. because this is something that will be, that will be with us for a while yet. and we should be prepared to all sorts of contingencies in future big attempts right now,

deputy foreign minister on from months really previously to isolate russia at you had for mister love raw, for instance, bun from the o. s. c e parliamentary assembly and the russian delegation from the munich security conference as well. will such actions? will they work in separating russia from the global community? the munich security conference is just ridiculous. i. e degenerated over recent years into the platform, were only the western nurse entertained themselves and enjoyed. ah, nice companies are which other? ah, the formal fog? denial of alternative messages that was practice sized in munich brought us well before this year of 2022. and the next year 2023. so

low were the level of russian participation there. and we were a close to boycotting these events on our own. and even in absence, in a hypothetical world with no special military operation, oil is c. e e's are collapsing as a structure ah, aids being cynically abused by the very same a group of countries to diminish importance of alternative views on global architecture and on european architecture. so our absolute of minister law girls in lloyds is regrettable, but this is also a sign on how furious our adversaries are in terms ofa, just destroying the fundamentals of procedures. not only the fundamental or political and security architecture,

but the very essence on how the international system works. they are afraid of truth, and they continue this ah, culture of denial in diplomacy, a b, or polish presidency at o a c e completely completely nullified any relevance ah, to the sand by the section. i want to get your thoughts finally on the big issue that they the big picture right now in the world. a multi polar world is that coming around is not close because russia, russia is not alone, but it is clearly seeking to develop its partnerships. busy all around the globe. what is moscow's vision of such a world as an aside to that as well? if existing powerful nations resist the rise of the east, the global saif,

what's the consequences of that? i think that rise over new centers of gravity. let me use the word not centers of power, although this is also a relative notion. but centers of civilization of gravity ah cannot be stopped. much less stopped by will, willing to re means by a group of countries who ah, entertain, ah, the sense of their own superiority or others. our vision of the new world order would be the one where international law is abs served and where there is sovereignty and mutual respect at the center, ah, of any relationship between countries, ah, no matter big or small, close neighbors or some one at a distance. ah, i would suggest that this division nowadays is probably

a further away than ah, many would wish, but i am very convicted and i firmly believe that there is no other way if our western union paulo world, ah, with all its deficiencies and distortions ah politically, economically psychological in whatever form and also in the important barrier or values prevail, then we will have a long term period off conflicts began small ah, and the troubles that will grow well beyond what we see to they. we should not allow these to happen and we should have an upper hand in our defense of cor human values. that's what russia will do on international arena in the time to

come. while we appreciate you coming in the program and giving us your time today. thank you so much sir. gay. rob, cough rushes deputy foreign minister. ah ah ah, ah ah .

so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race is often very dramatic. development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successfully, very difficult time. time to sit down and talk with you. no one. no, no, no. hon closure. no, no. well, go more shrill than what they should end up unit 731 was a unique organization in the history of the world. what they were trying to do was to simply do nothing short and build the most powerful and most deadly

biological weapons program. that the world had ever known and real no to production. it was it's, i guess she'll she'll book a enough fuel to good on. you son, new rochelle. he moved monica. she no longer thought this meant new. again, the more i got to learn much sale, i mean, i go on monday, i about doors. oh new. i know you didn't or guzzle more or less enough, jr. once i had to put all the sco their mother and all our buddy build garage door couches. nice. oh boy, that's good to go that route on what the on this the wow,

she my a new i know. i'm all i can send more or said mom, good student. i don't a year you're not on. all of them are going to keep us together with ah, needs to come to the russian state patrol narrative. i've stayed as i phone and ignore some scheme div us. mm hm. no jingles, lamps and a group in 55 with. okay, so i need to bargain speedy. when else calls with we will ban in the european union,

the kremlin media machine. the state aren't russia for date and split from ortiz spoke neck, given our video agency, roughly all band to on youtube. and pinterest with me. ah ah ah

i look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings except where such orders at conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. at that point obviously is too great truck rather than a very job with artificial intelligence. real. somebody with a robot must protect its own existence with

will because these are the fee. i don't the sweden c o c solution condo, also for the about shown on please be fun, claudia with a gun since your engine remains in your deal. when you come to the partition, you show a teacher who gets a shot and you don't know if she liked, the deal is get a minute for a minute. those no bob with motions to get a minute. those new with story crease ga. gov to other, but i should. characters should a new thank you. so when you have a sub washington, dick, tier 2 dash 12 swift t says ok,

so vice his mission v fan to the circle. as all you could do a dead deutsche when it's sun behind billing fun for by my daughter. now, let me look on the ones when i spoke with, ah, the headlines this hour as paris tries to remain part of an african initiative like terrorism, local didn't book, you know, process out about francis continued minutes in presence in the region. the french are going through all the means to take control to dominate us. we no longer trust them. if africa wants to save itself, this has to be done by africans. first, authority in central african republic have raised concerns all from a me to origin was used to attack a national significant type. so 53.