[000:00:00;00] a with headlines of this our, the g 7 joins the, you impose your price, kept on russian oil in pools. well below the current market price is despite lost is saying that could lead to further shortage the crucial commodity in europe. a warrant to serving images. i had 3 people are killed in the crating, the latest obsolete shelling of a residential neighborhoods in the city of the local official say, native shells we used in the a must wax claims of the previous management. took extraordinary service to suppress information about us present due by the

controversial son hunter. i made pressure from the white house and a canadian opposition party call for the diplomatic boy court of indian g 20 leadership. ledger minority rights violations. turning a blind eye today on his own, documented his treatment of native americans with you want to go to get anywhere anywhere in the world. welcome to international, just gone 5 am here in the russian capital and it's great to have you with us. i'm right mommy, let's take a look at the top stories of this. our the g 7 has joined the you and imposing a price cap on russian oil supplies at $60.00 per barrel. that's about $20.00 lower than the current market rate. the measure is part of stripping sanctions against russia over the green conflict. we deliver on the commitment of g 7 leaders to prevent russia from profiting from its war of aggression against ukraine, to support stability and global energy markets and to minimize negative economic

spill overs of russia's war of aggression, especially on low and middle income countries who have felt the impacts of putin's war disproportionately. russia has repeatedly said, it won't supply oil prices below the regular market value, if it contradicts the country's national interest, and as also condemn the western attempts of manipulate commodity. markets also contributes a rachel mawson shares her views on the issue. so the european union has finally decided on a $60.00 barrel ceiling for russian oil. now i guess european commission president and de facto, i'm elected queen of europe. ursula vander line can brag about how europe is united for ukraine, together with our partners. we stand united and firm in our opposition to russia's atrocious war. yeah, well that's sure didn't take very long. wagner line also tweeted that the price, capital, quote, help us stabilize global energy prices, benefiting emerging economies around the world. sure. or it could spike prices in

deregulate everybody's economy. and our particularity of benefits, europe, that really is having a hard time paying the energy bills. now that take care of itself off of cheap russian gas, but not sure what planet she was schooled on in market economics. but former us treasury secretary, steve minucci and certainly doesn't agree with the idea of a price cap when he called it unfeasible last month. and quote, the most ridiculous idea i've ever heard look a price cap, the market is going to set the price. so if you put sanctions on at higher prices in a way, you're just making the situation worse. the big concern here among american officials who wanted a higher cap is a spike in oil prices and a deregulation of the global market. it's almost like there is pressure for the you to ram something through before the weekend to avoid the embarrassing optics of getting to monday the day the price cap is supposed to be implemented. december 5th,

and not actually having agreement in place behind the scenes. there's a lot of talking to you about how much this is already worth since rushing crude has already been selling for less than the proposed cap. and this move also introduces another risk factor. that is, russia's position is that they simply won't sell to any countries implementing the ceiling. but white house national security spokesman john kirby welcomed the news. a pros, carpool help limit. mister put his ability to profit tier of the oil market so that he can continue to fund a war machine that continues to kill innocent ukrainians. so we welcomed the progress at our e partners, our macon on bush. the whole idea is to reduce rushes revenue. so that vladimir putin can't spend it in ukraine or, you know, fulfill is amazon wishlist or maybe finishes christmas shopping. what kirby didn't say is that the us treasury department has already granted exemptions to american

companies transporting russian oil. even if they're transporting it to some landlocked european countries, as long as they abide by the price out. so much for europe cutting off russian oil revenues. here's what the estonian prime minister cry a callous thinks is happening with the price go. every dollar counts, every dollar that was negotiated down, mince an estimated $2000000000.00, less income for russia. the initial proposal was to set the price of $65.00. i think partners who agreed to come down to $6.00 to $1.00. this man's $10000000000.00 less for russia to finance a genocidal war against to craniums. but europe has also been importing russian fuel transferred to the tankers of other countries off shore right before they offloaded into europe. and they're also buying it from countries like china and india that have been bingeing on russian oil and then, you know, selling it to europe and elsewhere. also,

since this price have only affects russian oil, transported by c, hungary, pipeline oil from russia has received an exemption to the cap. and the country's foreign minister said just a few days ago that that's the case. so, well, harry also got an e u exemption to import russian crude via maritime transport until the end of 2020 form. so that gives you an idea of how united the you really is on all of this. and by the way, japan has already reportedly been given a green light by the us to keep importing russian oil from their joint project with moscow. one thing's for sure, though, the so called defenders of the free market are pretty quick to throw out even their most cherished values and principles. if it means taking another wild swing at russian president vladimir putin, even though they're batting average so far, isn't very good. if they were hitting home runs, they probably wouldn't be talking already about

a 9th round the sanctions. we heard from finance professor richard would a who says the e youth simply refusing to rush lives, card marker pushes. it looks like we could reach the point where europe will decide not to buy oil from russia, but that's europe's decision. and it's going to be a disastrous decision. if europe says we're maximum going to pay x, you know, $60.00 per barrel or whatever it may be. and you know, this may be fine if the market price is at that level or the market price is lower . but it's a market price, but it's a global international market that is worldwide. if the market price is above that cap, then of course every supplier in the world. and that includes russia will say, that's the market price you need to pay the market price. and then europe says a, no,

we're not willing. then the way to describe what's happening is that europe has decided not to buy from russia at the market price. so if russia decides to reduce the supply, i mean that's russia's decision. and europe clearly cannot complain about that because it's europe that refuses to even recognize market prices. ah, 3 people have been revolted, kill, and 5 others wounded in the latest you plan on to the shelling of begin areas that don't ask on the city of the not wanting you may find the following video. disturbing. local officials say you can, a forces have conducted dozens of artillery strikes in the us republic over the past day alone, while using nato ordinance residential building, sort of damage by the shilling. all his ruined causeway reports from the regional capital. and again, a warning some up coming images could be distressing. ukrainian nationalists

continue to terrorize peaceful civilians. here in done as one of the bodies is right here. behind me, this woman was probably walking into a store when a shell landed right here on the very busy street right next to her, her bus stop. judging from what i'm seeing here on the ground, her head was blown off. now there are plenty of shops here. plenty of pedestrians are spoken to. a woman who was in the store. ah, well doing her work during the shilling and this is what she said. yeah, mother, i was working on a c machine. when the 1st shell hit, the windows rattled, and when the 2nd fell, the gospel inside, i got to run deeper into the building. then there was silence and the smell something burning. i went out into the street and saw a dead woman and another wounded and they say in a nearby store,

another woman died. sure, as the day progresses, the number of casualties continues to mount. there is another person who was killed by ukrainian nationalist. so looks like his body was ripped into 2 pieces and a right next to him, his his dog that he was proudly walking when ukrainians showed this area in the next. judging from the remains of, of this shell, ukraine used multiple launch a rocket systems to so are, gets a vis neighborhoods. and they're judging from all of the shrapnel holes in this building. this particular shell was design in order to cause as much damage as possible to take a look at this car. thankfully the owner was not in it, but it looks like its sustained quite a lot of damage as well from on. call for a marty,

done this republic. the head of ukraine's national security council has called for russia to be destroyed with his existence as a state completely wiped out, insisted that they can be no peace thoughts with moscow. as off the recent statements form of the russian side, we said moscow would want to resume negotiations with keith. if was that there was an issue additional when they put it on the list a lot. they just need to be destroyed so that they start to exist as a country within the borders in which they exist. they're just barbarians. and when they say that we should sit down at the same table with these barbarians and say something. i generally think this will be unworthy. the great official may, those the laws, junior security form in cave attended by name to and the representatives. we heard from a european studies professor said the west has never considered russia an equal. and the i did express for the, for an official rooted in extremist ideology. let me just remind you that

this was the idea of the ideologists, the national socialist party of germany, of nazis. the system of international relations, as seen from the political wise is racist to the core. even when we look at, you know, these calls for creating a war tribunal. let's look at the word tribunal for the crimes in former yugoslavia, right? well, these are crimes only applied for the locals. it doesn't matter on which side of the of the. busy of the front in the yugoslav civil war people were fighting. but if it says that the mandate of a court is for crimes against humanity on a certain territory, and it only applies for the local and not for for foreigners. so nato's war crimes that happened in, during the wars of, you know,

you was love learning the was of civil wars and they were not even considered. so the same racist logic is applied to russia. russia is seen as an object. and as a problem, the point is that russia was never seen as equal. and the idea that it can have a, if you have a say and power to defend its interest is dangerous by itself for the creators of policies in the west. and i think that's where all this comes from. suassa says toland has taken advantage of his position as the host of m. o. s. c, conference. him in the russian foreign minister and journalist from attending, we heard from moscow's own voice to the o. s. c. he says, pulls, moved to brown, the russian top to prove that was an unprecedented violation of the organizations principles. won't you mind mutable? it was unprecedented in the history of the

o. s. e. to prohibit the russian foreign minister from attending this form. we have noted this fact and expressed our official indignation and protest. we have been supported on this issue by several participants of this forum. for example, the austrian foreign minister said this dialogue was meant for everyone and such an action was inadmissible. so it was impossible to negotiate about this if the polish chairmanship failed. it was a rooster phobic, confrontational, aggressive atmospheres specific of thoughtfully. the e u is not necessarily a member state in the o. s. e, but it has his own seat and acts on behalf of the whole group of e u. member states. this contradicts the procedural rules which specified that 57 sovereign states worked within the oversee framework and should act in a sovereign capacity with some of the you is violating these rules, which is we have drawn attention to this each time there is

a new chairmanship. lucas with us. yes, ma'am. i think that is impossible to say that europe is isolating russia. it is the bureaucrats in brussels. we're trying to isolate russia. it is not europe or its people. in this regard, it is necessary to separate politics from normal life with the fact that life in europe is already not normal, is shown by recent events. the sanctions pressure on russia has turned into a glimmering against europe's own residence to the citizens who are actively protesting and demanding an end to this policy, which is impacting the well being of european citizens. near details have emerged in the hunter biden laptop, scandalous twitches. neonatal must box claim that the platform previous management took extraordinary sets to sentences, publications about the u. s. present controversial son allegations were posted by

pullman american journalist. twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story. removing links and posting warnings that it may be unsafe, they even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases. for example, child pornography was was logged as all thinkers, one. caleb lopez in neil came great to see it seems scandal. adam manipulation is afoot, can you break down some of the details for us? sure. well, it was hours ago that alon musk said he had bomb shell information about the suppression of the un turbine laptop story. he teased the online community with that. and later he didn't meet his own deadline and he continued saying. busy information was coming, that was being fact checked. and then finally we did hear from alon mosque and he shared an a long thread posted by the journalist matt

t. i. e bay mats i. e bay brought us this information about what had gone on. some of the 1st tools for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and financial fraudsters. slowly over time, twitter staff and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools. outsiders began petitioning the company to manipulate speech as well. first, a little, then more often than constantly by 2020 requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. one executive would write to another more to review from the biden team. the reply would come back handled. now, in addition to that match i. e bay has shared a screen shot that seems to indicate that the biden team wanted the 100 by laptop to be suppressed. now alon laws promoting this work by met i. e bay and providing this information fits a pattern now on mosque has been raising the issue of the need for transparency about twitters operations and

a frank discussion about the role of information and access information and social media companies in political discourse in the united states. there has been ongoing outrage about how the scandal surrounding 100 biden's laptop was suppressed now us mainstream media assisted it was simply russian dis, information and has now confirm a confirming that it was actually true. there's been ongoing scandal and outrage about this now. alignment taking control twitter seems to be moving in the step of providing more transparency about how these decisions are made. giving voice to those who feel that the big tech companies and monopolies that they're essentially engaging in partisan political activism for certain sections of the establishment. so this is a pretty big revelation from a long mas indicates that under previous management, twitter seems to have been playing a political role. we will see what alternately is to fall out of these new

revelations. are very interesting to find out how things pile out. so it's fun to watch what's going on, coming out from the white house, kind of always good to you. so thanks so much for joining us. last minute i forgot . let us go live now to big tech expert. i'm the author of google archipelago. michael. rent for michael for joining us here. see also doing it for the last minute. now, these are allegations of manipulation. most of the opinion, if the why have potentially pressure that they put pressure twitter to commit censorship moving. they are alligators, after all. yeah, there are basically 3 issues involved here. the 1st issue is the twitter. it's been revealed and we knew this, but it's really official now has been operating as a democratic party, oregon, essentially with democratic operatives running the company before a law muster over and may be

a little bit now as well. the 2nd issue is that we have the question of government officials directing twitter to squelch particular speech, which is a 1st amendment violation. you'll hear a lot of people say, well, this not 1st of amendment violation because of the private platform. well, government intervention to square speech is a 1st amendment violation. and the 3rd issue is that we have election interference here. and it's apparent that we do, and that would be an in time donation on the part of twitter to the democratic party without any recognition or acknowledgement which is against the law. says no, no causes a twitter levers. blue is what you're saying. okay. all right, so the social media platforms have a lot of power. is it potentially whoever owns that social media platform? do they have? i mean,

is that something that we need to be worried about or the general population to be worried about today? we've uncovered censorship tomorrow. wasn't to our well, i mean when we're seeing censorship, it matters a great deal because 1st of all, this is not only the control of the information that users would pervade to each other. but it's also controlled by the state of information. and we've gotten revelations recently from the intercept that in fact, the help part department of homeland security has a back to work to facebook and instagram, telling them what types of post to utterly squelch to strangle, in effect is 68. so what we're looking at is a very serious situation in which information these are now the, the bottlenecks, through which information is delivered to,

to the public and such their power is extremely important. and unfortunately, it is being misdirected entirely. so it's a whole homeland security having, i mean, this is security issues. this is an important thing, but what the head of the know the leader of america, joe biden, in this case, would he have, you know, this kind of power to, to squelch and he kind of, you know, gossip about his family to have that power. yes, i mean they've said that basically this was revealed that they, they squelch narratives of all kinds including about the virus and the vaccines, but also national security and also international policy are. so it was during, they were directed not to allow certain stories about the, the russia, ukraine conflict, for example. so this, this goes very broadly and it could go to personal matters, or in terms of the biden family and their various enterprises to put it lightly. so yes,

this could go to those kinds of issues because they said anything that that undermines trust in the government can be squelched. well, that doesn't sound like freedom of speech to me, michael, thanks so much for joining me here. last may r t. thank see great, thanks again for your time. my pleasure. well, let's move on now. as india has a, she and the g. 20 is presidency, a major opposition policy in canada called for a diplomatic boycott of indian leadership in the book of alleged human rights violations. democratic calling on the government to strongly condemn india's discriminatory anti minority laws. if threats of ethnic cleansing, the persecution of minorities and the rest of journalists and human rights activists in canada should reject any g 20 activities plant in kashmir,

and refuse to attend these activities. while the human rights abuses continue, carter has been heavily criticized in recent years of allegations of his own human rights abuses. last year i'm the international issued a report exposing some of the most egregious issues that includes the discovery between may in the summer of last year, all the remains of more than 1300 indigenous children buried at several former schools of indoctrinated native americans into european culture and commission concluded that at least 4100 students died was sending those schools. i need you to miss treatment or neglect. indigenous peoples have been forced to live on reservations with underdeveloped infrastructure. i'm pull was a surprise to have been concerns that indigenous women and children facing

disproportionately higher levels of violence. and there's also reported lack of health care facilities and emergency services in those areas. am indian a former senior, their provider says it's noble for western countries to meddle with other countries relations without tolerating interference in their own domestic affairs. canada is creating problems with not only i've spoken with many other countries, including russia. do you think it is perfectly normal for them to interfere in the internal relations? a lot of other countries internal matter with other countries, but will not tolerate any interference and then in so this is zack, a double status that we see from law. many, many countries and they hide behind the so called values of democracy and freedom of expression. but this doesn't, doesn't, doesn't apply when it comes to what they decide should be the normal freedom of

expression. another thing is that they are used to this kind of thing because partly because it is part of the western world is protected bottom natal. it has got a strong relationship with united states, and therefore the thing they can do all these things with impunity because there will be no price to pay. and this has been true now for so many, so many decades. but the world is changing. the world is changing, if i want a sifting for the rest of them, have the same kind of dominance over international affairs as they had in the past . and not the people more and more see the double standards under your policy of these countries. and therefore in time in time, they'll be a blowback and they will be a price to be. for this top us defense manufacturer has unveiled and next generation self boma. the beach want to one reader, which it says will be able to reach any target the b $21.00 rate or will be capable

of penetrating the toughest defenses to deliver precision strikes anywhere in the world. the be $21.00 as the future of deterrence. yes, cross is, is lines and gather most intelligence, in addition to being out for the long range missiles, an anti drug and munitions. the launch was initially scheduled for last year, but was beset with significant delays. meanwhile rush, i'm try and also developing their own self bombers with reportedly similar features . let's cross live mouth retired us air force, lieutenant colonel. karen, good koski can always good to see this new bomber. i mean, we don't really know a lot about it as tension areas, heights and tension, the wall. i mean, what would you make of the timing of this? well, frankly, it was, it was at the same time is that you know,

on musk and twitter released the i twitter cover up. so i'm not sure who was watching the b 21 unveiling. the timing is such that i, you know, 7 years since they got the contract and they now have of the of the airplane. the prototype anyway, hasn't flown yet so. so the ceremony tonight the unveiling was really it was kind of a non event in many ways. it's a, it's a pretty airplane. looks a lot like the one that came to for it. and it'll be interesting to see what the other countries have, how similar it looks because we've been, we've been down this road before. losing to say, i mean, it's good, nothing to do with what's going on in ukraine. you think? i mean, the reason why i ask is because it's constantly hear about, you know, the start initiative in the new clarissa issue. we've heard this craft canarsie carrying nuclear weapons on me. i don't know if this is true, but these are just speculations. but in a time where we're low here in peace, it looks like,

i mean you are lieutenant colonel retired. mm hm. oh is it not time for p, some sort of bringing out new weapons. a bigger girl is a bigger cough. was it? certainly it certainly isn't. and if i watch the unveiling in such a defence austin did explain as we knew that you can carry a nuclear weapons. and when he described that, he kind of stuttered a little bit on whatever he was reading it. it is really a, it's a dangerous thing and it's, it's something that is probably not necessary, but it, what struck me is, it kept talking about how this change is everything. and the way i see it, it, it actually, it changes nothing. this is the same trajectory that day, certainly the united states military has been on for 35 or more years. nothing changes. but they emphasize that repeatedly, that was the theme. this change is everything. and i'm not sure that it really does

. although some interesting technology they talked about and they did it every all for you, i have you have come, i'm, i do enjoy to leave you alone with me. all. so you won't question on my go by dora to saying enough, but i just one more question. go the republicans now having more power in congress . i know it's a bit of a political question, but he explained to the us to reduce its military aid to ukraine. will reduce anything, you know, what this will do, foresee the future of municipal for q i, i've, even though they're talking about more dribs and drabs and a lot of money, certainly up to 100000000000 in this one year to ukraine. i see it slowing down, i see it dropping off partly because a lot of the things that ukrainians can use. we don't have any more of a delay in producing some of those think some things we're not going to produce and the new or we're strategic weapons. those kinds of things we are not going to give . nobody is going to put those in ukraine because this is,