a, i don't know, i just won't go crazy reason, but i am a fan of guaranteed income because it is this idea that everybody is deserve it. and just bad virtue of your being here. ah, she wouldn't. you would like to ask in this regard. what did you expect? how else do they treat those who allow themselves to be treated? as you officials way come to the fact that your wife is the one capitalizing on the bond class of functions against russia. vladimir putin phase, the europeans, should have seen it come with the u. s. military decides to immortalize its most notorious panels in a rog by name. it gets new warship for new jersey to fight massive civilian casualties or the use of chemical weapons. that last instagram were thought the

video of an indian woman being sexually assaulted, quoting the shocking footage newsworthy, and claiming it's good for raising awareness with . i will welcome this is actually international. with the latest world news update is good to have you with more. did you expect that's what a lot of a putin is asking you. officials who have started admitting that the us is the one caching in on europe. the energy crisis says she wouldn't do it today. the you authorities, themselves are already saying that the policy of their main partner, the u. s. is directly leading to the d industrialization of europe. they are even trying to present some bills to the american susan's aim over this matter. at times their statements even contain words of resentment. so like, why are you doing this to us? which one would like to ask in this regard?

what did you expect? how else do they treat those who allow themselves to be treated as you been after all taken? so it is their own business? actually, it's important to understand. first of all, that the european union is always ideologically driven. first and foremost, its entire available data, forcing a patchwork totally disparate cultures and countries into a single political and economic straightjacket is totally ideological. so a reasonable person looking at some of the moves that the u as made recently will be left scratching their head if they are looking at these things through the prism of logic, reason, and pragmatism. instead faced with any given issue, the e, u, adoption, ideological virtue, signaling approach, and then when it fails, and the g, p. s, navigational system is streaming at them. do a, you turn, do you turn, you're about to drive into a ditch? they then try to correct course now in a classic example of the kind of ideological driven reasoning that risks to being

translated into actual policy here in europe. here's polish prime minister mateus mar wiki, wondering why some e u countries just refuse through logic to fix the blocks exploding gas prices, which are ultimately the result of their own anti russian sections. by simply refusing to pay the market price for gas. some countries which have to deal with this crisis from the point of view of the prices of gas on the prices of oil. do this in a very, very selfish way they do. let's see the bigger picture. while they just stick a cap on it, it's not easy, right? actually the selfish thinking that he's referring to is thinking that the whole world revolves around europe and will just bend to its will to mitigate the mass made by its own policies, particularly when the block is making no effort to climb down from the ledge on which it perched itself and its citizens. now another example of ideology above

pragmatism, the e, you cut itself off from russian gas through its own sanctions and only then clued into the fact that they'd have to rely on the goodwill of washington for a decent price on american allen. g. not only did the price get jacked up, but then biden, on top of that, to add insult to injury, introduced this inflation reduction act, which he calls a climate act. i guess you're supposed to think highly of it because of that because you know, they're all about the climate. and this thing includes tax and energy incentives which could be ultimately applied to europe, european businesses that can't afford expensive american gas in europe. so they can just, you know, move to the u. s. and enjoy the low domestic price of it over there. now, french president a, my grand michael, went to washington a couple of weeks ago, only to try to talk by the out of this. no doubt the americans dock right on, not straight away boss working on it day and night. which is why the you is still

complaining about it just this past wednesday. the u. s. inflation reduction act provides generous incentives for investing in the us, including in some ways that are discriminatory against european companies and other companies as well. we already have war in europe. the last thing we need is a trade war on top. okay, so other than complaining it's sounding like a broken record or being the same thing over and over again, and just hoping things change. what else can be done about it? while european commission present ursula vauder line said on thursday that the e u is just going to set up a quote. sovereignty funds for businesses. nothing says sovereignty like you business is going broke. because of the eas owen, energy policy fiasco so much for sophisticated policy, it looks like they're just going to start flashing the cold hard cash. now, some european politicians are under stand at least skeptical. and this whole idea,

a solution in the multi and the old financial framework comes to light and risks been too small. so of underline said that define should be all set to go for next summer. well, come on. greatness takes time, right? unfortunately, bankruptcy doesn't. the us is to name a new warship after notorious battles, a ford in iraq in 2004, and which human rights groups claim, washington committed war crimes, something the u. s. denies. earlier don court has helped me more on why the navy has chosen to glorify the role of his marine corps despite the grim legacy of the battle. it's an honor for me and for our nation to memorialize the marines. the soldiers and coalition forces that fold valiantly and those who sacrificed their lives during both bottles of fallujah. this namesake deserves to be in the pantheon of iconic marine coal bottles. while it's probably not the best idea to immortalize

an event that is remembered by most people as one of the bloodiest episodes of the u. s. is a military occupation in iraq. i mean, just look at the civilian casualties over 600 unarmed men, women and children were killed in the 1st battle for felicia and another 500 of those people, unarmed men, women and children were killed by the end of the 2nd battle for it. there was even an instance in which u. s. troops fired upon a crowd of protesters and killed 13 people that were simply demanding an end to the u. s. military occupation there. but for many observers, probably the most scandalous thing that happened was the fact that the u. s. used white phosphorus as a chemical weapon in civilian areas. and then on top of that, they lied about it for years. it was only after actually a documentary came out showing previously on showed unseen footage and interviews that we started, c u. s. troops coming clean about this kind of stuff. i will proceed from the us

department. once for susan, susan williamson to leave in 8 animations for this trip to use the rain fresh from use hampton's and was seeking some of these attempts to manipulate the narrative of what happened. didn't even stop at these lies about white phosphorus. either. i mean, the international press institute accused the u. s. a violating press freedom in iraq because it said that the u. s. was delaying the publication of photographs that showed us troops abusing prisoners. why, apparently the military top ras thought that that would make their job influence a lot more difficult. i remember the battle so well, and now here we are almost 2 decades later. i can't believe that one legacy had events left behind for the people living that of course, the usage of chemical weapons on the people of felicia has had a serious negative long term consequences for the people living there. i mean, horrific birth defects began to be reported, incidents in which babies were dying within the 1st 30 minutes of being born were

reported as well. and we even saw a 12 fold rise in the rate of childhood cancer in felicia, after the battles of 2004 there. and there have been a lot of reports have been made since then that link these types of illnesses to the battlefield. findings suggest the enriched uranium exposure is either a primary cause or related to the cause of the congenital anomaly. and cancer increases. questions are thus raised about the characteristics and composition of weapons now being deployed in more than battlefields. so the us military is trying to name the ship, of course, after felicia, in an attempt to honor its troops. but really, it's more likely that it's just going to remind most people around the world of the horrific human suffering that us troops inflicted on the people of felicia and instagram video of an indian woman being sexually assaulted by a group of men has been restored to the platform as often an oversight board

underlined what they call the news worthiness of the distressing footage. it's not recognizing that the video both violated the company's adult sexual exploitation policy, and i also am bold and perpetrators. instagram ruled that the content should remain publicly available in order to raise awareness. given that the video does not include explicit content or nudity, and the majority of the boards finds that the victim is not identifiable a majority. for instead the benefits of allowing the video to remain on the platform behind a warrant screen outweigh the risk of harm. let me take it to the timeline 1st. so in march of this year and instagram account in india, that usually talks about marginalized community, both about marginalized community in india, boston, a widow of a tribal woman who was being sexually assaulted by a group of men. now are this we do, of course are, or this is instagram account has about 3000 or followers. are most of them from india are, but then of course, so one user reported this we do after which after

a human review met and decided to remove it saying that advice leads is a sexual exploitation policy. but after that, what happened was that this was further flagged of wire met. i employ to a larger committee to a larger global operations committee. and well, they viewed it and they thought that in large of public interest, and that it was news worthy to restore it. so they restored it this time with a warning in factor, and they restricted the content for minors are but of course met as always i bought also upheld the decision or to restore the instagram account. but there was also a split as far as this sir, or side board is concerned, a why law are some of them. i did see that while the woman's face is naught, with the bull, while is no new ditty. i bought

a lot of them also thought that i are the content, the risk of putting out the content was not to look at what all of this essentially highlights is that meta has nor clear policy when it comes to sensitive content such as this one. what to bam and what not to ban. in other developments, new sites, the palestine chronicle say facebook has threatened it with restrictions and the total ban for alleged community standards violations. the chronicles chief editor told us there's no oversight when it comes to matters. controversial decisions. actually in 2021 of human rights watch. did you know a thorough internal, a thorough investigation of facebook, a behavior that was palestinians. and that's precisely the conclusion that they have reached. that there is a decided anti palestinian sentiment that facebook and many palestinian accounts have been wrongfully deleted. now facebook itself, actually a few months later,

this august to its own internal investigation. and that's also what they've added. so even facebook agrees that facebook is silencing palestinian voices. now, the problem is you just really, you don't know how to respond to this sort of and that's because, you know, that we have very, very little leverage as palestinians aside from course, raising the issue internationally. and hoping that there would be some, some backlash in which people would put pressure on facebook and these other social media platforms. but for the time being there is no oversight and is just free censorship. and there is no accountability, legal or otherwise, ah, a new countries are failing to work out the details of setting up a special war crimes tribunal for ukraine. as according to e foreign policy chief use at burrell, he states the blog is considering bypassing the international criminal court.

monday we were discussing about it without result, which is the most efficient way of hiding impunity. they say c a c c. when is something more, it is possible to be something more? this is an interesting discussion that the time being has not a concrete answer. several countries have expressed some conflicting opinions on the proposed tribunal. amsterdam wants to host such an organization was saying it should not interfere with the work of the hey, court. not via won't tribunal based in the baltic country with no wide support among you. members for that proposal either. let me, while the us is in the middle of examining ukraine's proposals for the tribunal, one of the you k, and already set up a training program for ukrainian judges to conduct trials on alleged war crimes. moscow say the us and if you are paying our lines, have no legitimacy to prosecute russia over its actions in ukraine. moscow was also

accused the west of turning a blind eye to kfc military atrocities, including the deadly shelling of civilians in dumbass. ukraine's 4th is are also stepping up. they're cracked down on a ledge, traitors and collaborators. brittany guy, news outlets has as a report about civilians being at risk on territories, we captured by ukraine and some local say, key of can persecute anyone accused of supporting russia. most of the refugees we meet are reluctant to show their faces a scared of what they've heard about the hunt for collaborators in areas we captured by ukraine. to put up a diet to cover people go missing. they say that the taxi drivers who were taking people to the russian border were killed. and many people who were cooperating, who went to work for the administration. they were all imprisoned, which is independent journalist look where they say that a new tribunal in the west would not be approved by other countries unless they can also take pause while ukraine's own potential war crimes should also be

investigated on in the west. the indignation has valuable geometry on which, seeing that in iraq, him with seeing that libya was seeing that are in remain out for remember in 891, they found out that 4630 people had been massacred in our team shorter and it was so a fate use if you speak of a tribunal international tribunal, who will you call as judges? i mean, not the cranes. i mean, they should be members. oh, you know, they should be called to the bar, but they should opt to churches. it should be international judges. what about china? what about india? what about african countries? for example, in here. so in all the places, the fact that they have now, own commandos cleaning command those there to, to liquidate to people who sympathize with the russian troops. what about the

ukrainian atrocities in this conflict that you know it's, it's fairly difficult to, to get the world to agree on an international court and creating one on when, oh, just like that because the european commission of britain and you west side. so it is exactly what the world refuses from the west to a us lawmakers, one congress to vote on a proposal to remove russia from the un security council. here's how the bypassing congressmen have justified their draft resolution. the russian federation has carried out and the legal premeditated unprovoked and brutal war against ukraine. resolved that the house of representatives urges the president of the united states to limit suspend or terminate rights and privileges that the russian federation exercises in the security council of the united nations. we've heard the u. s. ambassador to the un make noise around such an idea before,

but there's really no mechanism for making this happen. there is no mechanism in the un charter for removing a permanent member of the un security council. permanent means permanent and there is no procedure for removing members of the un security council that are prominent members. so if you look over the resolution is 11 pages long written by these 2 u. s. lawmakers then it basically argues that because they consider russia's intervention into ukraine to be improper. busy because of that, russia should be barred from participating in the un security council. now what's interesting is they're citing the fact that the un charter gives only 2 criteria for when a country may carry out a military operation, one as self advance and to as being done with the the, the permission of the un security council. if that was the grounds upon which a country could be removed from the 15 member body, that leads the you add the united states would have been removed quite

a long time ago. let's recall the 1999 bombing of serbia by the united states. that was not done with the approval of the security council. let's recall the nato invasion of afghanistan of 2001 we said, or we can recall the 2003 us invasion of iraq, which the un secretary general at the time even admitted was a violation of the un charter was illegal. here's what he said at the time, i have indicated it was not in conformity with the un charter from our point of view. from the charter point of view, it was illegal. now the 2011 us nato intervention libya was done under very spurious grounds. and the un only approved a basically in arms embargo and then the united states moved into with the new, the no fly zone and eventually a military intervention. then you'll also recall in 20, in more recently 2017, the united states conducted air strikes targeting the syrian era republic,

a sovereign country. the usa continues to violate the terry of tauriel integrity of syria with us troops in syria. without the permission of the international recognized government. so if you look over, if you look over the list of u. s. activities that have been carried out in a country simply intervening militarily and another country is enough to remove a country. the usa should have been removed a long time ago, but this kind of activity fits a pattern of the united states and its allies trying to politicize the activities of the united nations. recently, we saw iran being ousted from the women's rights council of the united nations. now, many of pointed out that this sets a dangerous precedent when one country can essentially be ganged up on by the united states and its allies and removed from international bodies. this kind of violates the purpose of the united nations, which is to bring countries together to work on problems that affect the whole global community. even a lot of countries disgusted by

a runs behavior would have preferred something milder, like temporarily suspending iran from the commission on the status of women. but the u. s. effectively forced other members to get in line by announcing the initiative with very little warning. now iranian leaders that pointed out this sets a very dangerous precedent. country is facing some international disapproval. then that gives the rest of the countries the ability to kind of gang up on them and force them out of international bodies, which is quite dangerous. now it's also been reported that the representative of the military government of me and mar, has been blocked from reaching the united nation than taking his country seat in the united states as kind of arbitrarily preventing the military government of b and mar, from representing itself as a member of the united nations body and all of this points to the united nations essentially being abused. the un is, is essentially becoming

a mechanism for the united states to carry out international agenda. busy and violation with proper proceedings. iran had spoken up about us abuses of the un. here's what's been said to stick with is simply another respect example of us hypocrisy. the u. s. has merited as fender practice to abuse and drill such valued concept as human rights. in order to achieve its energy to make political goal. and it has achieved so by utilizing the platform of the sources, the organization and multilateralism of the nations were exposed to have countries working together to carry out their goal. these, these, these goals don't seem to be being carried out. we see a situation where it appears that the united states using the un for political purposes. this latest moved to try and introduce legislation in the united states that would lead to russia being removed the permanent member of the un security council. it has no legal basis. you and charter,

there is no mack in his m for removing a permanent member of the security council, but it, it accompanies another creased effort by the united states to politicize the activities of the united nations. the u. s. has slapped a new round of sanctions on zimbabwe, accusing the son of the african countries, presidents of corruption and human rights abuses. and bob boys, government has hit back saying the white house is actually targeting the nation's economy. the intention was never to attack individuals who do not matter any way in terms of interstate relations. the intention has always been to cripple as empower way and economy. and it's not fortuitous to they are picked on suppliers of key and puts to a critical sector of our economy, namely agriculture. they did it before and i can assure you that they will do it in future. several different us ministrations of upheld sanctions against symbolic way for 2 decades. white house claims the african country has been carrying out

disruptive actions against u. s. foreign policy. washington, as also hendrickson bumper, is the ability to borrower from foreign financial institutions which has contributed to hyperinflation. in the country. well meanwhile, them bob white house traditionally maintained good ties with russia, with the african nation, also refusing to support us back to our solutions against moscow at the u. n. political scientist which at my home versus the usa to bring down, as in bob when government, when the sanctions come in to make the economy males down. and when the, when the economy melts down, there is a search of the citizen despondency, these ions and all of that functions did not playing the we're not playing introduced into this. but when political stays, sanctions, german with sponsored with them propaganda, functions came in with this subtle get a position political part, just thought the idea is to assist you all at

a 1000000000. again, elected governments. because even to not do that these years from a very, very straightforward transport to that since 1967, a partner in dismantling western imperialism. so without doubt, december's direction with russia may actually contribute to that. but i'm don't want to give us a constancy in madison bob. wish it convinced by your story called quenches to maintain its relations with russia. a turkish president, faith he wants to came up with moscow under moscow to come back what he's called american fact. terrorist groups inside syria is comes off, the u. s. military resumed its patrols with kurdish leg militants in northern syria following week of turkish as strikes in the area non cos military targeted side, sunday deville, jewels of the so called syrian democratic forces,

led by us fax kurdish militias. ankara accuses because of carrying out a bomb attack and he stumbled last month, killing 6 people will be moving a few. others had previously reminded washington stopped supporting the warning that anchor would otherwise send its own troops into northern syria. report say they joined us as the patrols received on saturday of the turkish ariel campaign had lost the largely subsided and assembled based professor of international relations and law told us that washington is pursuing a policy of double standards in dealing with turkey is the wifi syrian to protect its people and carry, carry according to your article, 51, and it stayed in acceptable to us recognize pika, theories, organization and other side when it coming to syria. these are the ticket forces that will stand out the american sources and pick a guy. it seemed people,

there are people. and also the are killing c, building people the in our country, the us, the stop the given this effort that, that there is going to be serious up. he has to, we can give out. he can be go ahead, step by step to establish with normalization, syria and listen number one. and number 2 is the s after a huge well known dad. gary, don't any intention of the very total integrity against syria? why did you have ever real 80 mail thought you pick a p and given support and up and down united states of them, right. i hope the us in sanctions on to the air and pull up your file and why do they want? why the sam from soldiers is due at border they are the pro, texting to who and for what the if they want to protect the cherokee except of if they want to protect the a p a. p. he why they were se, the peck sort of

a feel bayside between reflecting the separate thing if they're, if they are going to say things they may, they do like the cry indian, they've got a glass and they have the reagan administration. poland the police chief was hospitalized after a gift from a work trip to ukraine reported. he exploded in his head quarters. a ceiling on the ground floor is understood to have collapsed at rooms above were damaged, and the officer is not being treated for minor injuries. ponens ministry of interior of the present was given off for a meeting with ukraine. police and emergency services. proposal claimed it was a grenade, launcher and investigation into the incident. has been launched with poland, austria asking ukraine to provide an appropriate explanation. many thanks keeping his company here on archie international as always you can find the latest updates on our website out. ah,

ah, ah, ah ah, ah ah . mm.

so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy, even foundation, let it be an arms race group is on often very dramatic development. only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very difficult time time to sit down and talk is 2 days. we love in this country its cache and freedom. but anybody, it's ever been poor here can tell you that in america, if you've got no cash, got no freedom shackle jackal. do a job that explored you shackle to get interest right? this app she draw shackled to medical bills for ailments, so old they could have their own student loans, their default. they know it's an oppressive.