when are you one of them 11? i think it's an up with a with we have no other choice but to protect our citizens. it wasn't not to stage a coup and ukraine. they started a great conflict on a low running west policy aimed at new binding. russia being a refusing to piece beijing said its relations with moscow are unshakable off the russian leverage and national security. tv posted by the tribe is president a just a, this is push the platform to post containing any non mainstream narratives on

ukraine, africa call on london to finally compensate the victims of colonial era crimes 70 years off with route to the cross to allow my rebellion in kenya, or our parents greatly suffered and some died in the process of the brutal colonization in our country leadership. we have now should emphasize the importance of compensation to the mouth with good morning. good evening where ever you are the whoa, whoa, comes up party in 10 national broadcasting live out of the most. i'm right. hm. i mean, today we're looking at the weekly pass, any breaking news. so let's get started. some news from the afghan capital where an explosion has rocked the diplomatic district which houses foreign embassies. according to the taliban officials, the blasts took place near and close the door in sight. no casualties have been

reported and there is no word on what could have gone explosion. the incident happened not far from the russian embassy in couple, but afghan police say the facility has not been effective with rocket motor mike of muslim. wanted to put in, says the west left moscow, no choice, but to defend his country's interest and people. the president added that russia always showed a willingness to pull peace, but all such attempts have been blocked by moscow's opponents. as our thieves, marina casa river explains, vladimir putin reiterated once again that russia has always salts negotiations. it has always sorts a peaceful solution from as early as 2014, but again, to no avail. and he reminded us once again who started this whole mass and who is

behind it, most importantly, tickets that you've used, we had to stand up for the people that live in these territories. we had to support the choice of commands. it wasn't us who stage a coup and ukraine, they started it. basically, this is all the policy of our opponents aimed at dividing russia. well, our goal is to unite the russian people to chicken. and the focus is, and always has been defending the rights of the russian speaking community in ukraine and those who asked russia for help. and also of course protecting rushes and national interests. those were the key points from this little short interview that we heard. and this is something that we've heard from latimer boots in time and time again, but it seems that the west are either unwilling to hear what he said or they're unwilling to acknowledge that period used to i believe that we're doing things right. we protect our national interests, the interest of our citizens or people. we have no other choice but to protect our citizens who we are ready to negotiate acceptable solutions with all participants

in this process. but this is their business. we're not refusing to negotiate to sexy, mckesson commits so once again, we can hear that russia is willing and is ready to negotiate. but we train seamlessly based on willingness and also is strong on to me and encouraged by its western allies. there is no conversation of peace thought some are even discouraging ukraine from trying to negotiate with russia. and while russia pushes the, the so caves, western allies who keep arming ukraine are sending the opposite message for mentality imply mr. merit druggie claims the current is unwilling to deescalate. while nate is chief, as at hughes moscow trying to play full time with the proposed says fire brush hopes to freeze the war to allow its forces to regroup, rearm and try to launch her a new defensive. however, worse than politicians themselves are the ones who use the mens piece deal for for

don barzyk game time for ukraine. back in 2014. then german charles, either merkel admitted she helped the broker, the international agreement only to allow him to prepare for new conflict with moscow. the 2014 minsk agreement was an attempt to give the crane time. he cried yes, this time to become strong. as you can see today, the ukraine of 20142015 is not the ukraine of today. the little alice nicholas merkel, which says nato has vain army and training the claim, menchie to fight against russia for the past 8 years. and nato few, this war does not forget that there was a acquitted time 2014, then nato trained ukrainian army. now the, the full fledged war is not forget that this war did not start last february, but it did start in 2014 was said, habitants. inhabitants of don bass being shelled on a daily basis or 10000 people died. the west nurse speaks about this,

and now nato wants to act as a piece keeper. how can you be a pyro man and a fireman at the same time? so this, this really doesn't make any sense. the only thing we hear coming out of western europe today is war, war weapons funding, the war. i mean it's, it's, it's been, it's extremely interesting enough to run through and through the internet to try to find prominent europe, western european politicians speak about peace and we've got victor or been, or the prime minister of hungary, but we've got very few, a prominent politicians in the west, speaking about piece of this, it was in this what the european union was supposed to be about peace. they can't, they can't broker piece because they're only interested in following the atlantis washington rhetoric of going to war. because that was, that was the, i would say the, the target since the beginning of the sleep present was in warm, the, you, the consequences of unilaterally sat seeing a policy on russian energy. i layla moscow has no plans to stick to lewis and

impose camp saying russia will set its own prices. yes, in england, in general, you know, sometimes our colleagues and partners surprise me with their unprofessional decisions. after all, at one time it was the european commission that imposed on us the transition to so called market pricing for gas. and we persuaded them, i personally did this, we persuaded them in brussels not to do this, said that the gas market does not work. this way, it will lead to serious consequences to a surgeon prices. it's happening right now. now they don't know how to get out of here in or trying to regulate gas prices as well. simply, bush. russia has at his a u. s. and the e. u. of attempting to manipulate the international energy market. this comes after the e, impose a price cap, one russian energy in an attempt to undermine moscow's ability to finance the conflict in ukraine. now, new russian legislation will free the states no age, a gas exporters from fulfilling foreign contracts. if they violate national

guidelines, the details of authors revise policy will be finalized by the end of next week was his gdc declined less than predicted this year in defiance of the unprecedented western sanctions. independent just look, reveal, says you have in economies of the ones feeding the bites of the backlash, that's what we were told by the germans, by the french, by our leaders in the west and our sanctions when necessary to branca, russia to we sneezed, but we are all armies, energy wise, it is, the situation is that we have mine a stand last week for us. it's a terrible winter. i mean he rushes minus than is quite frequent. but here people start to realize that we had a huge problem of energy, no fuel, no gas, no, no one, no, no solutions for oil within months,

in long term solutions, not before years from now. our economies in tatters everywhere. i mean factories closing. the cost of life is increasing. we have for 10 percent, 12 percent inflation. we can't get energy. this is terrible and they don't have an answer on so our economy can countess and rushes seems to do well. so china's foreign minister has applauded the relationship between moscow and asians. first thing that the bilateral tires remain unshakable thirty's aperture among with a cap put into china. russia relationship which is based on non alliance, non confrontation, and non targeting of any 3rd party remains. rock solid, such relationship is free from interference or any attempt to so discord between the 2 countries in is immune from change in the international environment. to russia and china said to deepen, thighs and moved towards

a more multi polar world. the sentiment came earlier this week, julia, a visit of russia's deputy ahead of security dmitri medford of to beijing where he met will present vision thing. so dtn correspondence sit near as the details according to a chinese reed out after that meeting between general secretary after cbc central committee and president sheeting and the chairman of russia, united united russia party demetri. many of the 2 had covered quite some ground in the range of topics. china would provide more opportunities for what he's and prosperity and on relations of the 2 parties. she had said that the long institutionalized context between the 2 parties have become a unique channel and platform for a consolidating mutual political trust between china and russia. and she said he hoped 2 parties will continue in depth exchanges on governing experiences, development strategies, and international and multi national corporations. and on the china,

russia relations. she had said that in the past 10 years, china, russia relations have was due to changes in the world and have always developed in a healthy and stable manner. she said that china, russia comprehensive, strategic partnership of coordination were a new era, is a long term strategic choice made by both sides based on their own respective conditions. and he said that china is, were willing to work with russia to deepen relations, enjoying the promot global governance in the more just and reasonable directions and on the crisis in ukraine. she had said, as always, that china continue to hold an objective and fair sense. and promote peace talks. he hopes that relevant parties could be reasonable, restrained, and have comprehensive dialogues and resolve security issues. through piece talks about the long vice chairman of the sy,

sense of its actual study says that russian troy releases can explain by the fact that both states share a common vision for the world order. or i think the year of the target audience is, of course not only the 2 countries, people of russia and china, but also to the rest of the world actually shows china's resolve to seek for a better understanding. with the rest of the world. was this announcement that china believes in peace. china believes that the relation was russia really reflects the core interest, respecting of the core interest of the respective countries. so this is something that i think are our friends in other parts of the world need to understand that

when it comes to relations between china, russia or our 2 countries do have a lot in common, not only in economic or you know, dependence interdependencies, but also are about our view towards the future of a multi polar world time as express anger over washington's authorization of up to $10000000000.00 imagery support for tie one without mincie. would that said the u. s. as a direct threat? the international order. meanwhile, the chinese navy conducted patrols and live fire military exercises near ty, one bicycle into the chinese military command. facts have repeatedly proven that the united states is a direct threat to the international order and the driving force behind regional turmoil. the united states stubbornly pursues its own interests 1st and the

willfully wages worse and quits conflicts with other countries for its own self interest, causing the large number of innocent civilian casualties and displacement. the resolution of the taiwan issue is the chinese people's business, and china's eternal affair, which does not allow any external interference and the u. s. has no right to make a responsible remarks. according to the latest u. s. defense act up to $10000000000.00 will be provided over the next 5 years, a modernized try one security capabilities. the iris defense murphy says the decision showed. washington is committed to his ally obligation, u. s. arm sales to try one of continue to grow this despite the issues, training beijing relations with washington there's, there's a wall again and he says the us uses tie one as a tool. it's multi level strategy with china where i think it's quite apparent

that her the taiwan strait or is not at peace at the moment. and the main reason we all know that it's because the u. s. is making use of this tie one issue and trying to to, to play this card so hard as to, to irritate china. but on the other hand, the bad government has repeatedly said that they respect the one china policy that they do not seek a taiwan independence. they won't assist taiwan independence, but what they do and what they say they don't actually match. so of course, the chinese government is quite unhappy about this, and we've already seen a spokesperson from china's defense ministry making our position very firm. so let's see. let's see. but i hope during that meeting of us,

or secretary of state blinking when he visits china matters like this will be discussed. the latest batch of leaks, twitter files reveals that us intelligence agencies aggressively push the blue bird to send any anti ukrainian narrative, dismissing them as part of a so called russian propaganda campaign. the documents, detail events between 2020 and earlier this year before a law mosque bought twitter. yes, the i and other security agencies suggested that counselors compare the cleaning government to nazis of world war 2 were created in russian troll farms. they also labs that any of the $280.00 characters scripts which said ukraine is home to multiple violent, neo nazi, been tires patrols and should be banned. the platform,

the file so that washington's collective massive with queue could not be cast into doubt. and any implication before that russia was provoked and the conflict was to an investigator has been given access to the twitter files as questioned the story line, but forth in tell about the shady origin of these accounts might be true. but so my at least some of the information in them about neo nazis rights abuses and done by us, even about our own government. should we block such material? this is a difficult speech dilemma. should the government be allowed to try to prevent americans and others from seeing anti ukrainian accounts? according to the ex jose, the us labeled uses as pro russian trolls simply if a person verified for digital fax, sharing footage of near nauseous carrying 3rd reich and other fashion civils would accusations of spreading misinformation. a tooth investigator with access to the

lead file says of platforms executives were under pressure to look for shreds of foreign middling, but came up with nothing born meddling had been the ostensible justification for expanded moderation. since platforms like twitter were dragged to the hill by the senate in 2017, the twitter files show execs under constant pressure to validate theories of foreign influence, and unable to find evidence for key assertions, found no links to russia, says one analyst, but suggests he could brainstorm to find a stronger connection. louise, go on to further shed light on us intelligence agencies showing screenshots of messages were agents allegedly told twitter soft to ban specific pro republican and counts as well as the suppressed stories like law hunted by laptops, capital. my last person live now to discuss this with martin j, his own award winning jennison,

and instead of the my grabby dot org join us from market. thanks a lot for joining us today. that was your reaction to these latest leaks which detail of as that happened, of course before, must bought twitter. it's very warm, isn't it? that this idea that america stands firm on liberty and freedom speech from freedom of expression, etc. when in reality, the more we look at the scandals between the american states and social media platforms previously was facebook. now as twitter, the more and more we realize that that's not really true unless it only seems to want to support a narrative which corresponds with his own. so, you know, if there are, seems to be this push, this is this, this initiative, this is inertia within twitter to route house. all those who don't really follow the, the white house a narrative on ukraine. and the idea is that it would be so much easier to control and manipulate how the people, how to just everyday use of twitter,

interprets the nuances of the everyday war and ukraine. but i think it's interesting the timing as well. this come, this is come out. news this come out just a few days after. so then sky was a motion turn with a begging bowl. just aps, a week or 2 before congress is supposed to back biden's military, a plan of $40000000000.00 of half of the military to the ukraine. i wonder if politics played a role in this, but we'll have to wait and see on that one. but you know, not, not a very good sign. i think it reminds me very much of the mark twain, the quote about some newspapers, you know, being misinformed, uninformed whether you buy them or not. yeah. yeah, good car indeed. right, so i mean, what does this leave? twit said, i mean it's reputation and passes. now people still buy fee to, to use it, or is going to be able to turn things around. what seems to be the last place to go if you wanted to debate ukraine will or really anything if you want the truth about

corruption, america, when we're talking about 100 bonds, laptop, or other such candles, you know, it's not gonna help it miss it. i mean, you paid over the also the company in the 1st place, way of the 40000000000. i can't imagine the company's worth even half that today. you know, with the ubiquitous understanding now from anybody and follows these events, you know, more or less, you could say that twitter is in the pocket of the intelligence agencies. i mean, it's not exactly great advertisement for social media platform. is it? no, said, i mean other, any other social media platforms out there that i'm probably under the influence under the se, west and pressure? i think you know, at a glance more next for these things. but at a glance, i would say the law, you know, i think there is a very strong push from western leads to manipulate social media platforms. because we should never forget that one of the war is going on on the ground in ukraine with the greatest victims. in my view, the humble ukrainian people, there's

a big war going on outside of ukraine, which i think is possibly even bigger and more significant, which is an information in an american's wherever they go around the world. get involved in local political scraps. they always follow this doctrine of horizon issues dumbing down every think. and then following up with a disinformation campaign, i think, you know, the more we look at the social media platforms, we see that they seem to correspond more with that ideology with those, those more morales of us, the right word than, than objective i should say, than anything else? so it's out there, you know, it's very, very hard to say western social media platforms as soon as you, when there is this real lucid objective to root out. anyone who doesn't really agree, who actually threatens to even start a debate on how we interpret the news every day from c, n, n, an n, b, c, and b, b, c cetera. make a very good point. i'm, i don't know if i can, the day when i was younger, they used to be debates all the time. i just took on

a subject until it was about it. and, you know, we, even at school, i remember who we were told to, to have an opinion and argue it, we see that these days. but certainly there's a fine line between free speech and anarchy. right? isn't i mean, what, what, where do we, jewel that lives for twitter and social media platforms? should there be a line of who gets to decide what goes on to it? what doesn't? yeah, that's a good question. i mean, sure you're showing your age when you're talking about me being allowed to be encouraged to beta schools. and so for that was the case in the old days. and it was the case for many, many days for many is it most of my career in media. and so more or less the advent of social media and the internet around 20020012002 where, you know, people became much, much more lazy. they had much less time to watch the news and read the news. media starts to implode, loses credibility,

and start to emulate social media as well. and i think in some agencies started to wake up and realize that to actually into trace those social media platforms would be hugely powerful and very, very useful for them. i've always said, i believe as a journalist that am i 6 and person, for example, has a disinformation department which is used specifically to feed information to general as you know, most recently a couple of months ago. i think there was a story buzzing around british newspapers about the russian president, possibly even being dead or being for in the least. and it was picked up by a lot of mainstream british newspapers and nobody even had to underline the nuances or caveats. it was just written, the future will be dead according to intelligence sources. so i think the intelligence sources to actually get the fingers i grubby paws into social media is a very, very sad day indeed. and these put files, i think it really discussion servers. it was much more behind them, but it's

a wake up call for an awful lot of nice people who actually think that social media is the place where you look for news. whereas in fact, it's ashley. anything but my view was said i was self. why 1st and then the people got the news from facebook or instagram, but anyway, saturday morning, that's all we have time for. thank you so much for joining us here. and i see a pleasure talking to you, sir. thanks again. oh, i said are centers now to africa where the flight of the mile mile war veterans who stood up against british colonialism in canyon. the 1950s is far from over. this week. they urge the canyon present to the man to compensation from the u. k. government, which westminster has pledged several times, but as yet to fulfill why view we are calling on the current government in kenny are to ensure they keep on press and the british government so that the ma, ma, veterans and their siblings can receive compensation well in advance. the british

governance agreed and 9059 to pay the compensation than place to do so again in 2003 and once more in 2007, most of the concerned parties should sit down and come up with the conclusion for the veterans. we don't know why it's taken too long for the agreement to be implemented. we are requesting to be paid the full amount from the world bank. 3 trillion dollars. let's give you some background on this. so now the 1950, the canyon people rose up against british rule. in response, the colonial army confined some one half 1000000 canyons to detention camps and lodged, emergency operations, torturing and killing thousands of suspected mouse opposers. war crimes was said to have been committed by both sides of the conflict. it was laid to revealed that british officials try to cover up their own atrocities. the surviving victims at home with their supporters are still seeking justice. somebody might not get out the some that house in camping by the world bank for mo, mo,

should be released immediately. some of us are certainly very all done and seeing that the others have died and we're only surviving by the grace of the lord. honestly, really suffered at the hands of it can yeah, yeah. it was for our parents greatly suffered and some died in the process of the brutal colonization in our country. the leadership we have now should emphasize the importance of compensation to the mal. oh, some of the remitted veterans couldn't even walk to this meeting. they are very old and seek some of it was a memory as a result of the torture underwent dirty colonial period. so our president should feel for the veterans and pressure. you could go for me while care is pushing for a measure response over alleged iranian arm suffice to russia. washington has approved almost $2000000000.00 of additional menchie 8th grade, which includes

a complex of us patriot missiles that an alpha was made falling present to lindsey's recent visit to the us. it was the legacy, his 1st trip abroad thought of the conference in february and his address to congress. he expressed gratitude to the europe for weapons already provided. and then off for more, russia has criticized the visit and weapons request and says the density was more interested in securing arms than piece. we spoke with the label rights lawyer and also dan me, over lic, who says the u. s. has profited greatly from it. supplies of military hardware to grow, that before, think that the u. s. is happy to give that money, whether the patriot missiles are used or not. it's also a matter of putting money in the coffers of the defense industry. us criminal institution, i'm forgetting which one, but that they are now sounding the alarm bells that they expect these weapons and

up the hands of criminal elements by the ministration has no uses interest in handling. and how do we know this? we know this because the democrat slowed down in a house committee or a republican proposal to audit the weapons that have already been sent to you. great. so we know that the u. s. has no interest in being held accountable on any false is has tucker carlson questioned why washington should keep supplying key with tens of billions of dollars in financing and weapons. we the historic debt to ukraine to have a historic animosity with a non soviet russian. no, no. how do we win here? what's in it for us, isn't this our country, and where do you get off talking to us like that? we hate ourselves so much. to have so little respect for the united states of america will put up with that. that will applaud it. thank you sir. may i have another? what's wrong with us? what's wrong with our leaders while you are slow,

like who's approve sending more money and weapons? you great, not all will so enthusiastic. republican congress from marjorie taylor green, criticized landscape, visit as absurd, labeled him a shadow president of the u. s. and called ukraine americas 51st state. media lionel says, is unfair to make american citizens pay for the government's decision to keep taxpayers funds pouring into ukraine. we're looking right now in the united state at a 1.7. think about this trillion dollar omnibus bill. american citizens are say, 1.7 truck trillion for what we're wondering, where are we going to pay for our operation? what get, what is our goal? are you suggesting? does this intimate, that we are involved in a war that we are a participant in this, that.