you the century for room, we will reduce the little minister, child shall go, my good friends, sad that russia did not fully fulfill it in this agreement and indeed it is. so it's a complex issue, but we had other agreements with turks as well. besides ne, putin, president putin and present every one as of signed an agreement and protocols on it'll, it where it took here has taken upon itself to distinguish literature. though the opposition that coordinates whither to reduce new turkey and then radical terrorists changes. we have agreed to move at the same instance at the same time in 20182019. we have agreed to jointly patrol m for road leading to a laptop. it's also not entirely working out. so we need to continue and strive to deliver on their agree tasks. they're still very relevant. wilson released

as for an economic rebuilding of syria. these issues are of tremendous importance as well. the west, by hook or by crook, would like to maintain the channel was soon of providing humanitarian aid without your control of damascus through the turkish border to 11. soon, slowly we have allowed to leave just one such crossing with a condition network. and we have to be dead legitimate, legitimate issues, methods of delivering communitarian aid according to international law, would increase. we'll move on to you. so there would be more opportunities to finance early rehabilitation project. so not only you, food and medicines provided, but to bring back hospitals roseville,

to bring back power supply and everything the water supply given. we were promised that there was also a security council resolution was supported by the wes and for the 2nd time in a row we see very limited progress. this is also a matter that you and should engage more actively in one more question from region m. b, an u. s. company, please. russell mckinney to rush al mardina mbm please. sure. you asked media, mr. minister and relations between russia. sure. and the u. s. m. like so, my little her, her as they are not in their best shape of cassini over 3. and one of the little was from the russian point of view, what would, what should washington do to bring back the relations to the previous level? that he and the vision in addition only to these if you chance relationship between brushing through us or do they stand in the way of finding solutions to other

crises. for example, yemen, syria, libya and iran. thank you. you really are every time when too powerful here, countries solution which is a really good room do not cooperate or if even mostly dont talk to each other that has an impact on their viewable capacities to find solutions to international issues which requires joining of averages. that's no objective thing. what is required? if you normal, when you're looking for the relation stew, beep, beep broad walked right back to normal sates. well, normal state, what is the addon? it will not be as in the past any more as stolen. barry has said that the relations between russia and nato and west will not be as the wearing the passive. that's what we have sad. we said that will be no more such situation when you are aligned to us,

what you through the premium when you're signing some documents. well, that going back on the word, we were as it happened with russia, nato council declaration, as it happened with a soon bull always see declaration. you always see that your declaration from austin, i in 2010. so, sublet shooting him of woody lou, as it happened with the ukrainian settlement agreement in february 2014 guaranteed by france, germany and poland. as it happened with minsky agreements that were signed not only been francy germany, but they were also endorsed by the united nations security council. all these agreements for the room were completely disregarded. they were not even going to implement them. they were lying to our face, the world, signing that at the level of ministries and prime ministers and presidents. we're all signing this lofty promises last lou to retrieve this from. so we stopped

taking their word for it. let's see. probably that used to be the russian tradition when the merchants used to agree and everything. they just shook hands on it. you school and if he dont deliver later than no one would even respect you. what's also peculiar. well, so we learned our lesson that, that doesn't happen when to produce was because we were promised that nato would not expand. so we started signing, documented political politically binding and legally binding documents. for example, the united nations security council resolution on risk agreements is a legally binding document. now, the u. s. is calling upon russia for russia to leave the ukrainian territory and to implement the un charter. this charter, among other things, mentions that all members of the united nation should implement the united nation security resolutions with you and such resolution on ukraine. on the misc

agreements was simply sabotage rules flexible new blue, moon, stubborn, and that's why the conflict was impossible to settle without any additional suffering. exposure, that's apparent for me. you're right now, our western france. good evening. some time ago, you know, somebody brought around, do you know, general assembly decision? that means every time someone uses a veto at the security council, the general sample should hold a hearing on the modes of voting on using the veto. we agreed to it, we have nothing to hide a little. so you should, you were very open about all of our books of votes voting positions. but the question is, do you which, why the general assembly will doesn't want to review the matter to lead to the

matters of such resolutions that were adopted when no one used to veto. but no one is still implementing them. for example, a palestinian issue resolutions there adopted with the security council. there is even a unanimous one. every one forgot about them. but the general assembly, when they're discussing palestine, they've been so rueful about the non implementation. which will you, reuben? why didn't they hold a special session today about the resolution williams about mr. agreements in ukraine as well? but some think about it, but no one wants it. instead of clicking through. there were discussions on some agree, some very you yourself through blue cross and blue shirt ideas about creating tribunal or, and with him. reparations mechanism coming from the russian federation. well, as they say to the woman, whatever does it. but all these tribunals also provides are needed,

beecham, bi ukrainians and their masters. we flew 3 will know, well not the whole 3 more. they moved, they don't need the tribunals said they, we want to use their problem as a podium for her to speak their minds. that's all they need. you, me a little closer to us in your system. so numerous that we didn't. so we'll destroy our relations with us after the summit in geneva, in june 2021 between a person by then present putin, formal group, which is where their gorbachev reagan formula was. yet again, confirmed that the nuclear war can never be won and must never before we have promoted this formula very actively, the west agreed to do it. i have to give it to them that the biden administration, unlike the trump administration, supported this statement right away. that allowed us would of your body in january

should will 2022 will seem to make yet another such statement that nuclear war must never be waged on behalf of the p 5 rule variable stupid. and the 2nd degree emitted after the u. s. russia, some men will let you know what was the beginning of a strategic dialogue in the senior reward on what would be the successor treaty to go after the nustar treaty runs out. at the beginning of 2026, we started a strategic dialogue with diplomat military participating intelligence services as well uses what? oh, there were 2 rounds of negotiations. you do? i think it was in july. and later in september, i think of william 2021 little fun. yeah. good. it was clear. morales. what's the next step for organizational matters. where did you discuss?

that's also important because somehow after september the rush have discontinued the strategic dialogue. because as you said, you would have no now when they say that we need to bring it back while we were knocked it, tear it up from the national and none of the dimensions of our corporation or content related if it was discontinued by the us, not by russia and he's fallen at them around and ask him, then let, let, let's be friends again. well, it's not up to our 6 of you. they know that we are serious people and will always respond to serious appeals, prescript, bluetooth, prison, biding request, state prison, pushing dad burns should meet with the nourish king the meeting took place. it was very serious event. it was quite useful. there was no breakthrough, but a serious dialogue by itself is valuable. so it's not a meeting when you are just simply hurling mutual recombination against one another

. when there is a serious, mutually respectable dialogue. it's always good at the bullies in their court right now. cas, please. somebody minister ladder off. good afternoon, remy nazena oliver tass. information agency has a follow up to the question on the relations with the u. s. i would like to watch whether you understand when, when you are, the new us ambassador is going to arrive. and what are the prospects for the activities of the diplomatic missions? and what about the visas issued t, the russian citizens and is the foreign minister ministry doing anything to stimulate this process? i don't know when the new ambassadors gonna arrive. i think the official procedure has been finalized the agreement as been issued. we've got a lot of horrible. so we're waiting for her now as far as the conditions for the

diplomatic embassies are concerned. as in the previous case, i like to say that we were never the ones to begin taking any actions to hinder or make diplomatically cavities. more difficult. what's happening right now was initiated by the nobel prize winner, barack obama. and october 20, 163 weeks prior to the inauguration of president trump leaving the white house. give me prison, brack obama decided to create some, you know, pigeon, perpetually create some difficulties for his successor. some diplomatic property was taken away from our diplomatic embassy. and honestly, it was really somewhat dishonest. the diplomats were wonderful given at

dead line, mutually when there was no flight from washington. and there were more than 100 people diplomats with their wives and children. and it took them several hours to go to new york with all of their luggage. you know, to hop on a flight from new york, it was something low, amiable, undeserving of her. and, you know, through the president of the us, of a blue shirt. sure, and gillman with her sister. and they told us that we should wait until present tramp arrived in the white house and we'll sort this out . that's what they told us. we took a pause, but nothing happened even once president trump arrived and we had t reciprocate. we had t introduce a special regime for

a couple of 100 diplomatic properties of the west in moscow. and they took a for the fence, but a lot of them were moment. honestly, this was not a level playing field was murdered, and it was a chain reaction unleashed political not so right now. we do not have parity. and of the us as a serious advantage in terms of the number of diplomats if you look on those, you know, marshal because we have different count in techniques for the overall number of diplomatic, the staff. in terms of the count, we also have to count the russian permanent mission in the us believe it should be counted separately, but they are counted as the diplomatic staff stationed in the us. and as one had

written 40 people. okay, full issue. so the americans have a very serious advantage. so when the lament that you, those snell staff to su visas to the russian citizens. so do not believe that because we have a few people by when i bring in 40. but we never stopped su in visas, and we never really asked the american citizens to go to venezuela to nicaragua, to cuba, to get a visa. so we're trying not to be petty was let's move on to asia. china, media corporation, please. with the minister lover of good afternoon, what was included in the global chinese looking

a little tv thank network. my name is nate re mass like i'm stationed here in moscow. china, when you, when you play as spin, talking a lot about that piece and how important piece is to the world. china has been speaking about it, non confrontation line, and it's not alignment policy. but maria, that notwithstanding the west is seriously talking about a russian chinese ally and strangers care the world with this very alliance with what do you think? i think it has not been mentioned yet, but this is a typical tactics employed by the west. if they don't like something, they simply destroy it, crush air to sort of a heap of opera. so, as russia taken node right now, over the tablets are driving a wedge between china and russia, maybe some information or tags, you know, some blackmail, the signature technique employed by the american sort of move our relations with

the people's republic of china are going through the best spell ever fish root over the course of history. and this has testified you by president putting and prison teaching ping. this has been enshrined in the mutual bilateral documents. the latest one was adopted back in february when president putting paid a visit to the people's republic of china. so it was a special declaration of special statement about the international relations entering a new era, a stage of steady development museum. this is a very strong document which represents our point of view. i will world you and the spirit of solidarity between our 2 countries. and as you remember, i will,

chinese friends. you have said that our relations are not an alliance, but we are not a union, but in many respects it's even stronger than a union. these relations are pragmatic, based on mutual trust. mutual respect, founded upon enrollment due regard for the interests of one another, one or more. in other words, it's the ideal paradigm for building a relation with any country. and it's directly based upon the principal since trained in the you and charles her. and this year we are going to head record eyes in terms of our trade. it was a little less than 200000000000 years dollars. well, our little traditionally, i've been using dollars to you count. maybe we should count in robles. but apart

from that, we have very good corporation in the you were in the as seo and bricks encountering new challenges and threats. and of course, there is the corporation between the ration economic union and china and harmonizing evasion. integration on the one hand and the one belt one road initiative. the other one on the other hand, military and technical corporation joined exercises boulevard, reinforces our strategic partnership. and there's no doubt about that. the west can see that with you. one of them you said whether we have any data on the west, tampa ad, driving a wedge between our countries. well, you don't need to search for them specifically because these data are freely available. you know, there is a strategy o doctrines adopted by the viewers. there is also a declaration between nato and the e. u, and they directly mention russia and china,

a little nuance. they consider us to be an immediate threat. really want to be done with as soon as possible, whereas china is perceived as a long term systemic, serious challenge. and it's gonna take more time to deal with china as the west and a standard li, useful. but many independent observers be that in the us all elsewhere, you say that europe is making a mistake, trying to counter both russia and china at the same time. but they think they are of quite up to read the u. s. would be incapable of doing that on its own social school. you know, you had me say in brackets, i spoke about them. were basically enslaving durable, putting it to the service around strategy for world dominance and that's what

they're trying to do to japan. and they will try to involve others in such alliances as orchestra, new zealand, and canada probably, you know, for the anglo saxon 5 countries to become ever tighter. they're also making advances to south korea. adults to work with you to people may be, but in order to pursue it's fidel severely when you're listening line to what's world domination to contain russia and into china in the us needs new some others. it's impossible to do it on the road. you just use the form, so what they're trying is not a partial mobilization, etc. total mobilization of the western world. and it's just occurred to me, they understand that their strength is running out in terms of countering the

objective cause of history. which leads to an emergent multiple, a world, both the chinese and we can see that review. missoula was re camera, and this was dual go off, containing both russia and china. the west is trying to reserve to the tactics of driving, a wedge between our 2 countries. but or neurons, natalie's new listings, and you know, they want to convince russia to become a western partner. and then they will take pity and may as soon as. but they will use russia to contain china. i don't know, judy roberto or your group as come up with such ideas. they're cool of the analysts, but these serious, are you more completely divorced from life and we, we life, li,

russia and china see quite clearly that among the realities quite different. china is immersed and involved in the globalization in the economic fabric. they have a very big economy, bigger economy and schools. they've got enormous financial resources that are the bullies and utilities. we figured it's far more difficult for china world to withdraw from this west and domination than for russia. for russia, it's a process. this person has been facilitated by v blanket sanctions. so you can reach the ccb and the people who were trying to involve us into their economic system. i've made it clear that it's impossible to trust them any more with you. you are just

a couple of days ago. our prison has once again we affirmed and control confirmed i work cause i think that our chinese counterparts fully understand this review thread. and once the west decides to deal directly with china sanctions will be employed. well, the sanctions have already been introduced in particular with regard to what china can do in producing my purposes and a semi conductors. it's been publicly declared that there should be no dependence whatsoever in china that the west should have a such are manufacturing capacities of their own. so sanctions will be used. i'm confident of that. so we're not doing anything that would be really deeply problem, undermine our corporation. total solution,

but we are working together with china with the chinese businesses to woods lesser dependence on western supplies. almost half of our trade is being settled in you, in ren mean, be an in dubose and the share is going to grow rapidly. it's going to be bigger, greater. but let me reiterate, once again, china understands for well, these, each of west western doctrines, that 1st of russia and then on to china. this is not a joke. you, you know, as the sun goes the west, we'll try to do that as long as lee can. the worst has already declared its intentions with regard to taiwan. and these positions are absolutely land violation of a chinese, you and the

a national law. and that will create irritants for china on hong kong on king john anti bad. china understands which is quite clearly that stain within the western systems. and the complete dependence on the west or that is associated with strong risks to their independence, to their development. as a follow up of sputnik asia, please. good afternoon. leah need kovachick sputnik asia in december last year minister lab robin. you said that one of the important outcomes and foreign policy was the complete clarity for them as to who you are. could you talk to and whom do you couldn't trust looking for? so yes, i feel,

even though we average some clarity with regards to the collective west, but what are our views on the asian directions and what are our priorities in asia? in the east, i've touched upon the subject was western countries trying to impose ab block approach on the whole world. and particular in asia, it's trying to obtrusive, it's in the pacific strategy on the east. this strategy has been devised specifically to drive a wedge between india and china to involve india in its schemes. and it's quite obvious, you know, just as the establishment of august august, which was accompanied by humiliating france with this case for the supply of submarines when france was told that room and submarines were no longer

needs it. and the west is also pursuing soil approach, which is aimed at expanding loop wooden blocks with and of course sir, japan is going to be more heavily militarized. it's going to augment it, sir. defense expenditure. the same goes for new zealand and south korea. so they are potential participants of this. so pray says, initiated by the us. i don't know whether this will lead to but it's up to the government of these countries to make a final decision on that. but this whole process as aimed at dismantling with an undermining the structures that have been underline the security architecture in asia for decades. these structures were

based and centered around assay on which has always been the center piece of architecture in terms of humanitarian, economic or corporation. economic corporation they have created your logo very as smarty fast is, is mechanisms such as the dialogue mechanisms between ass in and specific partners, the east asia summit, which brings together when the money, the $10.00 as in countries and the aid partner country is a brochure. the where the india, australia, south korea, of course, uniforms of china. and it still exists. there is also v, as in regional security forum, which was attended by all the ass in can cheers and the partner countries as well as many other invitees. there's also the

e d m m plus from mechanism. so these are the defense ministers of asean countries and as he and partner countries, they are what other mechanisms that allowed to talk about economic corporation corporation encountering natural disasters, humanitarian corporation mechanisms for academia, corporation. it's still you existent on paper you for, but the worse and course is still friend loma which they do not want these formats the to set the pace to set the direction for future development. they want to concentrate new purchases with each narrow structures like or course that are going to be just expanded through new members. the americans are already showing.