more stalling a scared out and go saw men do not she then da da. nearly desert wonderful r lucille malice? lot a lot you there's been a fool because i'm running fine. theatre. that layout. ah, western defense chiefs discuss new arms supplies to ukraine with yet another huge usa package. but there's still no decision by germany on whether to send a coveted leverage with western faith move to a pump more arms into ukraine. russia draws attention to the deadly results of the use of such weapons in done by the un security council and to take your locals from the region would be the harder. so they've been a little bit at the residence of don't pass thanks to so called persistence of the notice land mines haven't joined. he wants from

a pay to house cents before you sent them back to life with the indian foreign ministry slums that controversial b. b, c documentary about prime minister, no rent remedy can they make it provokes colonial mindset. with broadcasting live from moscow. this is our t international into our top story, this our more weapons to ukraine, but still, no german tax, not the outcome of a meeting of western defense chiefs of a u. s. or a base in germany, voiced by washington's defense secretary to view the party contributor rachel marston on old secretary lloyd austin, basically just used the opportunity to ask america's allies to toss more cash into

the pot for the u. s. military industrial complex. oh, i mean ukraine military support spoken like a true board member temporarily. recused for 4 years by the way. and stockholder that yes. now canada actually did that. by the way, canada bought a u. s. made miss hubbard beg system as a gift to ukraine. so they're basically throwing money at the u. s. military industrial complex for ukraine. and now austin announced all the western allies that are also donating their old us patriot missile systems to ukraine gas. that means that the u. s. needs to make more to replace them for their allies. how about that? i had this meeting there. is there been a lot of pressure on berlin, notably from ukraine and from some of its european allies to cough up leopard 2 tanks, which no country can re export under german law without berlin's permission and berlin's position has been that it won't budge on the issue unless washington sends

its abrams tanks 1st. so germany has basically been telling the u. s. i won't jump unless you do and the u. s. is looking at germany and saying no, you go 1st. so they're both just kind of staying there at the edge of this cliff with no one willing to take the leap on this tank issue. now as recently as this week, there were a report citing senior pentagon officials, including under secretary for defense policy calling call, who said that washington simply wasn't ready to take that leave of sending tanks abram tags to keep citing maintenance and training issues. now even nato supreme allied commander, europe, or u. s. general christopher can volley said this week of western tanks, quote, there is not a particular weapon system that is a silver bullet. a balance of all systems is needed. so these statements by actual us military experts clearly diverged from the ideologically driven take of

politicians who keep framing western tanks as some kind of magic solution for military victory for ukraine over russian forces. on friday, zalinski made a direct request for the new tanks to the nato defense ministers meeting in germany poll and prime minister mateus mar wiki even said that either warsaw gets berlin's permission to send its leopard tanks to ukraine. or they'll just go ahead and do it calling consent, a quote to secondary importance. nice example of european unity there when it comes to being careful about potential escalation. apparently it's okay to run around off leash as long as their hearts in the right place. it's like the drivers slams on the brakes, trying to play hero to a pedestrian waned across the street, not realizing that he's going to get a whole lot of people run over and killed with this chivalry act. by the way, what exactly is this all this talk of tanks, world war one. if only this crowd could see fit to put as much time and effort into resolving the conflict peacefully as they are in serving up words,

salad and paying lip service in response to whatever demands he if tosses at them. and while the u. s. is following yet more weapons into ukraine. moscow convened the un security council and friday with a view to letting the global community your 1st time, the accounts of those suffering relentless shelling by keith's forces. russia's ambassador to the un stated constant military assistance by washington on that's allies. mix them party to the atrocities committed by ukrainian troops in recent years. zillow knew was critical accuser since can coordinate the use of western weapons and targets with representatives of the supplying states. we have every reason to assume that the united states and righto a consciously and intentionally complicit in the crimes of the key every game against the civilian population of dumbass soldiers in ask and against residents live in constant fear for their lives and at regular shelling money armed forces of

ukraine, that tragedy happened because the criminal regime, which came to power in 2014, readily and obligingly refused to fulfill the geopolitical tasks, which western sponsors to weaken russia to fulfill their sacrificing their own citizens, pushing them to war to the loss ukrainian when the west is testing new weapons implicitly getting rid of the old ones. i've been sharing over at abilene i st, and shopped on boston, thanks to the so called assistance of the north atlantic lines have been done for late. months from nate shall send to the quarter something baffling. they burned their loved ones every day, but maybe one of you can go and talk to people about how to so just of the armed forces of ukraine in the nationalist dissolve. italian use your tongue smartest to shoot their houses. how snipe is shot people he came out of there in the basements . the food of montana shows or let speak. now to serbian american journalist and former long time columnist that anti war dot com, no boucher knowledge. good to see you again that the u. s. and allies today pledged

more military supplies to ukraine, not considering ki, have coordinate strikes with its partners. do you think there, there is much concern among the allies over the civilian casualties? we see these weapons causing they're not concerned at all. not in the slightest bit any, any person on the other side of the line any, you know, they're, they're only concerned about western casualties and ukrainian casualties. any russian casualties or civilians and don bass or any of the other regions, are simply no concern to them at all. they don't exist, or they're considered legitimate targeting, which they said this explicitly. they said it implicitly, and the simply don't give a damn. and i don't think the russian presentation is security council today, generally aimed at them because i think moscow is well aware by now that they don't pay attention or can't be reached. i think it was intended more for the rest of the

world and relative charge of the world, which isn't trapped in this western information. self referential bubble isn't part of the golden 1000000000 of north american and made residents who considered themselves the world entire and is actually paying attention to what's going on on the ground. under those seem to be a 3rd for independent news in those wider parts of the world as well. net. i'm sure you'll agree, rushes, i'm pastor to the u. n. c's western military supplies to keep mix them party to the crimes. quote, committed by ukrainian troops cannot be disputed at all, not. well, it can't, but again, they, the west is basically trying the whole, it doesn't matter what is it only matters what we say is technique. and they're saying, oh, well, you know, we're not a party to cos. how are you not part of the conflict? because we say, well, you've armed this country, you,

you've sent it weapons. you've sent that advisors, you've sent it intelligence. you're literally paying the salaries of the government officials. it's again a scan, 2 point oh with this point. but no, you're, you're technically not responsible because you say so, i mean, this may fly in their own publics, which don't really have much choice, but the believe their government officials, what are they going to do for them out. but it definitely fails to land again among the rest of the world which sees this western germany for what a truly, it's a significant take away. i'd suggest from the meeting of defense chiefs in germany, it's, they know agreement yet on sending those german tanks are western nations not as united as they claim when it comes to arming ukraine. is that what we're seeing more and more? no, i think the discussion on the tanks and the types of tanks and who's going to send tanks versus frankly irrelevant. the, this entire tactic has been basically a giant media surface to prepare people for the gradual escalation. because if you

remember, they started off with sending seniors and javelin, portman portable and then they wrapped it up to artillery, and then they wrapped it up to self propelled artillery, and then they wrapped it up to high mars. and then they sent soviets, pigs from like old, eastern european are so, and they sent armored personnel carriers. now they're sending, you know, the french sending the like tank. pretty sure, sending calendar. none of these are being sent in quantities that could actually change tied to possibilities, but that's, that's beside the point. the idea is that they will gradually commit likely turning up the heat, the, to the whole boiling the frog metaphor. that's what they're shooting for. and did this whole drama, you know, will, they won't, day, the germans will eventually do what they're told, because the germans don't have independent agents. they're good vassals of the empire. they will eventually submit. it's just the question of how is it done and how is it packaged in sort of a piano move to, to make it fit the narrative from the western perspective from moscow is

perspective, it doesn't really matter. i mean, not ready, basically constantly accepted that it's fighting nato and is hopefully acting accordingly. one can only assume, again for the rest of the world. you know, it's just a question of whether they will accept wholesale, the optics that the need to meet their peddling, or will they actually add the 2 and 2 together that they can see and hear that was them heart rendering. i'm not sure if you saw all of it, but the un session today heard testimony from a mother and done boss whose daughter was killed just days ago just on a, on a human level. net. like how, how frustrating, how and re must somebody be when she sees the west death to their cause whenever she may be seen what is being talked about in the west? it's all about russia, tax, russia, taxi, me know about something and energy infrastructure in the main part, but yet, fatalities,

so close to her. that's just all but ignored another scene now as the norm, how can not continue? well, it's a good question because i've lived through the same exact thing 30 years ago and bosnian. this was the exact same, i don't want to say playbook because it cheapens the experience. but it's literally how the west behaved. you know it, the, the claim can concern for civilian victims, but they only see victims on one size and everybody on the side of the designated enemy serbs then russians now either doesn't exist or is by definition and has it coming. and it's simply the, the, the moral framework that they've built for themselves. and that's how they operate, which is why i think that the un presentation wasn't aimed at the west. because at this point beyond persuasion, it's aimed at the rest of the world. so that they can make a choice whether they're going to side with this golden 1000000000 that if the

claims to dominate the globe on, you know, by the virtue of them being to select, chosen or touched, or whatever. john kerry said douglas the other day. or if the, if the op for somebody who actually has printed well, good to have you on the program to say, always good to hear your thoughts. no boyish knowledge. serbian american journalist live and rti, thank you. ah, well, let's turn attention now to don boss itself. we're a russian journalist has been severely injured after artillery hit her grip in sala doris city, that russian forces recently took control of from ukraine's military war correspondent, our fate news portal rudolph g. f. honest. the cea yell souk of a was wounded when a piece of shrapnel struck her leg. she traveled to the city with other russian journalists when there were caught under shelley soldiers from the private military group in russia. wagner transferred on the c a to a local hospital where she's been operated on and likely is known

a stable condition r t spoke with the soldier who saved the generous lot. i know i heard her screaming and saw how she sent him to the street from a station building and quickly ran up to her, took on and dragged her by his body armor inside away from the window. i saw her left leg was injured with shrapnel. i stopped the bleeding and waited until the reserve group came to collect us. the bbc is peddling a narrative. again, those words from the indian external affairs minister as a new documentary is released by the channel that summer calling simply a hit piece on the current prime minister. is anything this film or documentary is a reflection on the agents and individuals that are peddling this narrative. again, it makes us wonder about the purpose of this exercise and the agenda behind it. and frankly, we did not wish to dignify such efforts. the bias lack of subjectivity and continued

colonial mindset is blatantly visible. bbc is to bart documentary c vs called india. the more the question, whatever that means has been slammed by india labeling 8 a propaganda piece. the documentary is about the 2000 to which arthritis and marine the more these are all in the violence in his home state out sued to 1000, to withdraw thrive for the. 2 worst error community lives that india has ever seen . nearly 2000 people had lost their life. it's also true that initially the blame was been on mr. moore, the were not being able to cobb the widens, but the supreme court of india has rubbish. all those allegations, in fact, a special investigation steam and 2012 has also given mr. moore the a clean chit, the documentary failed to mention any or that. in fact,

the document read efforts to a u. k. government report that claims that are in the us prime minister and then chief minister all could draw noreen the more they had proactively stop the police from preventing the riots. oh, human dri has lots of question marks. i'm not to lose paul, it's concentrating. it does not mention these basics, the supreme court would act on the s i t theme findings. this saw report and fact was prepared by a team that was headed by the then foreign secretary of the you care jack straw. but the question was, the british government holding an inquiry in india, india or a british colony, at least not often 1947. indians are outraged bbc's propaganda series on prime minister modi is aimed at denting his image. so they can as a state, broadcast or cast doubts on india's current foreign policy. our stance on russia or

our trade deals with middle east is upsetting the west. they're all hands on deck, the sole back fire. and not the 1st time that the west has published, such reports that greek or for colonial mindset, remember, in their belong has been complaining about the coverage that it gets in the western press. take, for instance, that time magazine colored divider in chew. but india also gives it back again. and again, take a look at this previously recorded b, b c interview with mr. moore the eve, was there more relevant than ever? so i would say it as a human role here as a jew internet, even john grey book bridge, just the human birds be and all of our the homeowners are your british has not reached over my eggs. but the brits never worried about human rights when millions of indians dined during british rule. take, for instance,

the sudden massacre or the bing all famine where millions of indians dying from starvation while the brits were busy transporting indian green to the u. k. no apology filled by the way through can't possibly blame mr. moore the for not being willing to take a lesson a morality in human rights from them. in fact, india, under the leadership, mr. moore, the in the last few years has been extremely fearless. believe his example of india defying west and sanctions, and specials to condemn rochelle is offensive in ukraine. but it looks like the west and the u. k. i simply not getting the point, but india has reiterated that he doesn't want other countries. poor king then knows in dallas matters a new killer blast for washington. that is how i rushed. his foreign ministry house described the recent report by

a private us watchdog which cleans 1000000000 or george sort of funded, leading media figures in the u. s. in order to promote his views, who had to new york city now and speak to our correspondent caleb. hi, caleb. some interesting findings and some big figures spoken about take us through the study. sure. well, the spokesperson for the russian foreign ministry, maria the carver pointed to the report that was released by the m r c group to indicate that this is yet another bit of evidence point toward why us media is simply not to be trusted. here's what she said was united states. such statement is a nuclear blast. if it is proved at the late in american media, received money for correcting how they present information than all the democracy. this taste is wrapped top in their constitution and thrown into the dustbin of

history. after all, washington has always insist that the freedom and impartiality of the media on the basis of the democratic structure of the country. now this report documents how george soros, the hungarian born billionaire, has been using his money to influence different media personalities and figures within the united states. and it's media and essentially, you know, trying to push them to put for at a particular agenda that serves the more liberal wing. busy the western power structure. now this is what's included in the report. it's just important to look at the details m r c businesses. extensive research has uncovered 253 journalism and active media groups across the world. finance to the tune of $131000000.00 us dollars between 20162025 sars is enormous network of philanthropic organizations which allows him

to leave an unparalleled footprint on global media. now the report was assembled by experts and fox news is reporting on it pretty extensively. they are giving it quite a bit of coverage and indicates what many have pointed to before indicates that there are facts to back it up about the role of the open society institute and george soros and his network of political allies and the foundations and associations linked to him and how they push a particularly liberal agenda. now, it's also worth pointing out that even though fox news is highlighting this report and the role of george soros fox news itself as a record of being rather biased, especially when it comes to international affairs. they tend to report on things without acknowledging much of the reality of international situations. so when people look at us media, they're not seeing

a voice that is very credible. they're seeing and the institution an apparatus that is created to serve certain agenda. that seems to be very, very. busy well corrupted a lot of wealthy interests and elements of the power structure pushing it in one direction to serve one particular agenda. the rhetoric from the states about human rights and friends, parents, the democracy and the consent to the govern, all starts to fall apart. if you look at this and you look at the recent revelations from a law mosque about twitter, and so many of the details that have come out, you can see that in the united states, there are many powerful interests that are working very, very hard to control and craft public opinion to serve their own ends are key corresponding killer my pin live from new york. well, let's stay with the story and get some reaction to it. always good when you can well come onto the program. talk show host steve mouth berg. the thanks for your

time today. i would suggest these are pretty interesting findings by the conservative watch dog. if there are fun to be true and you know, even 50 percent of the morrow. and if this is actually legitimate on the power that mr. soros wheels the way he's been using his cache to influence media figures. how significant are those findings? well, the media research center, i know that organization and interviewed people from that organization for, for years and years and years. i find them to be pretty respectful and pretty accurate. again, everything that we're talking about is in their reports, they get a 3 part series on this. and let's, let's give a few specifics which i think are important. first, let me just say that i don't think that george soros needs to give money to groups to influence journalists. for the most part, journalists, journalists, they're not really journalists anymore in this country. and most of the networks

and most of the media are far left. they push your far left agenda, they believe in a far left agenda. so this is just kind of the icing on the cake. and in many instances, according to the report, some of these journalists are then going on to defend and or praise george soros specifically. but let me give it an example. here you will have the committee to project journalists, all right, who's a senior advisor on there? according to the report, christiana, i'm a poor cnn international correspondent, top p b. s figure for years and years. everybody knows or she's on that committee that george soros gave allegedly $2750000.00 to between 20182000. 6 and 20, he's also very pro palestinian. i don't think the money to the organization makes that way, but it certainly doesn't hurt. lester hope is in that same organization. and. and he of course is the host of the n b c. nightly news. has he oddly very strangely,

but may be very honestly and telling about a year ago, all of a sudden declared it an interview. we don't have to give both sides. we don't have to be fair. fairness is overrated. really from a journalist from the host of the in the nightly news fairness is overrated. i'm not saying that's directly related to the sorrows money, but this is the kind of people you're dealing with. you also have a sally busby who's a editor at the washington post affiliated with that organization. another organization, the international fact checking network. i'd love to see everyone who then there, but a couple of people who are in there. one is the editor in chief of political fact. she's affiliated with that group. she's on the board also reportedly john manson, the president, the ceo of national public radio. yeah. so this is what soros does if

all those groups you mentioned, steve and there's quite a few more, the media research center has done extensive work on this. will they be likely to investigate themselves those stations, those channels? because you know what, if they did the public wouldn't not be quite a sight to the public to say look where hold our hands up. maybe some people were influenced a we're going through a 3rd fact checking job on this. no, i don't believe they'll even acknowledge it. they haven't acknowledged it and they're not going to acknowledge it. you know, they considered the media research center a right wing organisation, which they will ignore, like they ignore when you know, when the pro life centers are, are attacked or fire bomb or when a, a supreme court justice is fascination attempt on him. if he's a conservative, now they covered it, but not to the extent they would have had it been a, a liberal judge on the court. so no,

there is no way they're going to police themselves or look into this and not at all russia. foreign ministry spokeswoman describe the revelation she was pretty direct of a nuclear blast for us. democracy is this seismic as that, you know, i would allege that that means that she's saying that journalist have being bought and paid for in this regard. how important is this for, for us democracy, for it to be actually checked properly? i could be honest with you, as i said in the opening, i really truly believe that if george soros did not give a dime to any of these organizations, these huge lester hold would still be the same left her whole christian emma poured the same christiy and emma, poor little back would be the same. npr would be the same. the people that you gave me. why does he do that? why, why, why does he do that? what's his, what does he get from it? ok? because because as, as the study pointed out,

that it less to hold has defended george soros against accusations of, of influencing elections, of giving money to, to very left wing district attorney, candidates in places like san francisco and philadelphia. and trying to drive the agenda to elect people who will not prosecute criminals for many crimes. that kind of thing. soros comes under criticism. a lot forgiving is money, but, but, but from the right. but let me, let me just point something out. you've heard of the coke brothers, right. you've heard of the coke brothers and the mercer family, big right wing contributors to political candidates on the right. and then the media makes a scandal out of it and their influence. but they don't report on the billions reportedly given by sorrows the every left wing possible the from the l g b t q. 2 important, it's important, but this, this is not buying journalists necessarily don't need to be bought. unfortunately,

what impact then could this potentially have on media in the us? well, again, you're not, you're not going to see anybody disciplined themselves left the whole. it's not going to say, oh, the media researcher says center says i'm influenced christian m a poor is not going to become fair. all of a sudden. and on the other hand, you know, they're, they're just going to go about their business as usual. i don't think it's going to affect the way the media operates. one little bit. you don't think this is going to get traction among the public. now, because again, it's not being reported except, you know, in the states, it's not being reported anywhere except on. right. when media to an extent fox is, as caleb mentioned, and you know, on, on the of the certain websites. but no, i think the, the american public already knows according to many, many polls. some done by the, the media research center that the media ranks way,

way down when it comes to trust because everybody knows it's a left wing mouthpiece. and that they, if they, they know that and they accept that and they go about their business accordingly. based on that, well, it's all there are people can make up their own minds. they can read it up the media research center dot org site. let's see if they. well, steve, always a pleasure. thanks for your time today. steve mouth for a talk show hosts live and thank you. yeah, and that is where we leave a busy news. our 9 30 in the evening here in moscow. i'll be back at the top of the hour with all the main news headlights. they with the.