a with russia says berlin's decision to send tanks to cab is a serious escalation, also stating red lines no longer exists for the way we are fighting a war against russia and not it gave each other think and germany is foreign minister says the you should unite and it's more against russia, despite poll showing most people oppose the decision as the countries officials previously pledge to stay out of the fight. china says the us better mind its own financial problems instead of accusing beijing of being responsible for the

economic crisis across the african continent. with good evening, from our cater national studios in moscow and from wherever you may be watching, welcome to the hour's top stories from all around the globe. i'd fiorella is about russia, says berlin is not seeking a peaceful solution to the ukraine conflict, and it's focused on permanent escalation that says germany has caved and approved, sending 14 of its main battle tanks to ukraine following months of pressure from nato allies. and once again, we see that germany, like its closest allies, is not interested in a diplomatic solution to the crane crisis. it is focused on his permanence escalation and unlimited pumping of the key regime with more and more deadly weapons. red lines are a thing of the past. as a 1st step, germany will provide

a company of 14 leopard to a 6 tanks from boon despair. stocks of a european partners will also hand overlap into tanks. the training of the ukrainian cruise is to begin immediately in germany. germany will issue the appropriate transfer permits to partner countries that want to quickly deliver leopard to tanks from their stocks to ukraine. at the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe on tuesday, jeremy's foreign minister called on the e. u to unite, and it's war effort against russia. and therefore, i've said already in the last days, yes, we have to do more to defend ukraine. yes, we have to do more also on things for the most important. and the crucial part is that we do it together and that we do not do the blame game in europe because we are fighting a war against russia and not against each other. thank you. let's

cross live now to our, to contributor rachel mars then rachel, what are the latest developments on the story? yeah, well, as you can hear there, this is really just all about projecting unity. a p r, exercise. essentially berlin said that it wouldn't send modern leopard tanks unless washington sent its abrams tanks. apparently it was enough for word to come out of washington on tuesday that the u. s. would do that for germany to probably take a flying leap, sending 14 of its own leopards, and allowing other european countries to send theirs as well. so now germany finds itself leading the way in escalating a military conflict for europe and the west. yeah, that's always turned out super well. so it's hardly surprising that some german politicians are pretty upset about all of this right now. the delivery of leo, pod battle tanks, which leaped another taboo potential. it takes us closer to wardwall 3 than so it's peace in europe. the decision to continue making germany

a war policy doesn't have the support of the majority of the population. lip hot tanks all the pollute, to possible sly towards a catastrophe. now what does the german public think? well, it's split on the issue except for an m d r survey which found that 94 percent of listeners are against the deliveries. but that was before the broadcast or said well as just not rep. yeah, that would not be too convenient, would it? so according to an infer test survey, 54 percent of germans were in favor and the a r d morning magazine found 46 percent in favor. so roughly split half, 4 and half against. but no sign of any massive public. oh cry injury descend these tanks to ukraine. well, if their say ever mad, remember foreign affairs minister and alida bear, bach said a while ago that she'd do what it took personally for ukraine, regardless of what germans thought. so now it's a race to see who's tanks can get blown up 1st. it's hard to imagine this playing

out any other way, frankly, because it's not like there's air superiority to protect these tanks. there have also been issues with german tanks in the past. it's puma tanks different tat same zookeeper didn't survive arissa military exercise a friendly military exercise. none survived as in 0 were operational afterwards. and these leopard 2 tanks, the same ones heading to ukraine, were used by turkey against isis and syria and ended up destroyed by things like o anti tank missiles i. e d 's rockets and mortars, not russian military hardware. those things sticks and stones essentially. so actual pumas and leopards should probably sue for defamation, for the use of their name. with these tanks, sounds like these cat tanks are more ready for a petting zoo then for battle. and apparently, there are also high maintenance as well and is unclear whether ukrainians will have the training necessary to maintain and handle them. this whole tank issue really is

a p r exercise that allows now to project unity just a few days ago, nato had an image problem with press report, suggesting a fracture of the alliance over this tank issue. but actual western military experts have expressed skepticism over the real value of these tanks on the battlefield. how any one thinks that 14 challenger tanks or 14 leopard tanks or 14 am, was, will make it a damn difference, is beyond my imagination. you have the feeling that in washington we've got to get the most out of our investment in this ukraine proxy war. and you do that by postponing an end to the conflict. you drag it out and drag it out. but that seems to be the strategy or the goal of the current strategy if you want to call it. oh, but guess what tanks getting blown up mean that more have to be made. which means that the undisputed winner of this whole tank debate is the military industrial

complex. don't take my word for it, just ask ukrainian president, flamer zalinski. everyone can become a big business by working with ukraine in all sectors, from weapons and defense, to construction, from communication to agriculture, from transfer to id from banks to madison. everybody can make money in weapon sector working with you. craig clarity, it looks like the american abrams tanks won't arrive by the spring. that's according to western press report, citing u. s. officials. so the leopards will be 1st stop in this circus and also in the firing line. and everyone will be watching to see how they manage with their jumping through the flaming hoops test. maybe the u. s. can even sell europe and replacements for those, particularly if they fail and leave the audience disappointed,

or take contributor rachel mars then. thank you rachel. germany, which had previously abstained from providing heavy weaponry to ukraine over fear of being viewed as a party to the conflict, has now along with washington gone back on their pledges. disregarding previous precautions, us republican senator michael mccaul seems to have made a 180 degree turn on the matter as well. should ukraine be worried that the money is going to stop coming from the us? no, no. i think there's enough support on both sides of the aisle majority in the democratic party majority in the republican, the national security chairman like myself, supports us we. we have to educate our members. i don't think that quite understand what is at stake. so it was just right before the last election november the michael mccaul, that guy was saying, no, we really should audit all these billions we've sent to zalinski and his wife and craig with no idea where the money went. and we should know before we send more now,

is just saying no. the only group in america doesn't need to worry you off to where you can afford eggs. but so when seen his wife don't have to worry because we're never going to stop sending them billions of dollars. ralph niemeyer, chairman of the german council for constitution and sovereignty, says that germany's delivery of tanks to ukraine breaks a number of international treaties and makes germany a direct party to the war and ukraine. it is a violation of article assassin off to you and charter, which clearly says that we cannot, nobody can legally send harms into a zone of conflict. so that is number one. secondly, what is also clear is that nato treaty article 5 credit is violated because ukraine is not a member of nato. and we only allowed to move our military within the defense off nato territory. and of course,

german law because article 26 of our basic law, which some people say is our constitution is prohibiting us from participating from anything other than defending ne, 2 territory. since 1945, we do not have a peace treaty. we just have a ceasefire. agreement to potsdam agreement, we never got our food, some right, in the tape and up names. now, russia can argue, of course i'm say, well germany has violated ceasefire of 1945. so having said so, where does it leave us? we are becoming a direct party in a war earlier we spoke to italian journalist under our lucida after his recent trip to don bass, where he covered events outside of the western media is narrative. the visit got him placed on a potential terror watch list in europe. he says, the, you need the enemy,

and right now that has to be russia. i am include that in the essay. yes, lisa, that says shank and information system about the potential saturdays and potential salesperson's in europe. now europe needs enemy and this enemy needs to be rush. this is a very, very say it very said and make a lot of problem for person like me that's work with information about about what's in europe. the media said about the bus. totally totally fake the media now are science on most when you say that there is a rational pe shown russian invasion mccomb 3 federal contract. it's the there's a faith that is a people, not my people i,

i've seen those with the russian soul there. so with the personnel of the people in the business and it's not a month people's also the soul, the normal guys like for example, like they tell you. and so in the 1st year, so we're getting some what is the difference? because the, with the media fee that the some so there are like most that's a want to rape to steel everywhere. everything isn't there yet. there's no real rush. just thought diplomat survey lab. rob has praise moscow's growing relations within the african continent during his latest official visit to angola and went on to commend the unions peacekeeping efforts in the region. when would you, missouri bug, but different so we will continue to support approaches at the un security council

. suppose aimed at resolving crises, situations in africa, promoted by african countries themselves. russia supports the consistent efforts of the african union and the southern african region president lorenzo place a special role in those efforts. as we discussed, the implementation of all the agreements discussed today within the framework of the rush africa summit and approved the new meeting at the summit at the end of july in st. petersburg, full russian foreign minister, sir gay, live, rob, and his angolan counterpart have concluded their press conference after several hours of bilateral talks. the ministers discussed ways to deepen economic and political cooperation. specifically, in the spheres of atomic energy and education lab, rob said that russia will continue to provide angle and students with grants and education opportunities in russia. they also mentioned a potential cooperation in terms of atomic energy. and there was some talk also about the ukraine conflict. and labrat said that russia supports the un charter, the sovereignty of all nations, as and is against intervention in the affairs of these sovereign nations. he also

said moscow supports the african union and development attempts by south africa as well as angle and peacekeeping efforts, assuring that everyone that russia will continue to support security efforts in africa. so that's basically a rundown of what was said here in the capital of angola. angle is the 3rd stop of the leaders african tor on tuesday. laugh rob was an s one. teeny were a visa, free travel agreement for diplomats was signed. it was the 1st visit by a russian foreign minister to the kingdom since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1999 on monday law for i've also spoke with his south african counterpart where they agreed to combine efforts to boost the african countries atomic energy grid and other infrastructure meanwhile, zambia has been put in the middle of a diplomatic spat between china and the u. s. beijing has criticized washington and its relations with africa. after the us treasury secretary accused the country of failing to help zombie

a salt it step problems. even if the u. s. one day solves its debt problem, it is not qualified to make groundless accusations against all press for other countries out of selfish interests, because it cannot at all alleviate us. tremendous responsibility for the reason of the world debt issues. south africa journalists got lago miss, so me brake found the latest diplomatic spot between the u. s. and china. the tensions between washington and beijing is based on the increasing geopolitical tensions between the current nations. i mean, washington is seeing beijing as a country that is making very big inroads within the african continent and is focused on that military power and the economic influence that it has on the continent. they also worried that the influence that china now has on africa will soon so pass that of the u. s. i mean the u. s. has gone on to accuse china of

making inroads with regards to unfair trade and also taking out the natural resources unfairly on the african continent. but of course, china has come out to say that all the a cooperation as well as the trade agreements between themselves and the african continent have been above board and rather for the benefit of the african people. now we do know that in the last week the us treasury secretary jenna t. ellen has been on the african continent. her state began on saturday in senegal, and this comes weeks after china had already come on to the continent to solidify some of the relations that it has made inroads with the continent of a number of decades. who also know that the russian foreign minister is also on the continent and solidifying. we know that he wasn't as far as the land in south africa and now in angola. and as typical of the western jaelyn came out to say that the chinese have contributed towards the debt that has been accumulated. in zambia,

we do know that zambia has had very close ties with china with regards to some of the influence and the economic growth in that country. now it's quite typical of the us as we do know that they are trying to weaken the relations that the chinese have with the african continent. but a little too late. since we do know that the americans have spent more time, not solidifying. they stance in terms of growing africa, but all the in creating walls and instability among many african countries, while china was making those inroads in terms of policy making, it has made, made investments, most of which have been loans to the zambian nation. however, we've seen 2 upgrades of a ports. we've seen, dams, we've seen telecommunications roads, many off the countries infrastructure has been developed over the years. and ensuring that zambia is not equal to many of its african counterparts with regards to being able to be more economically active with the kind of infrastructure that

has been placed on that on the country. the inroads made by china investor ambien region has really benefited that region in terms of economic growth and can only seem to benefit them even more. the russian defense ministry has released footage of its admiral gorge cove warship holding drills in the western atlantic. the crew conducted an exercise on involving its hypersonic zircon missile, utilizing a computer simulation. the admiral gorge cough will then go on to take part, enjoy exercises alongside chinese and south african bodies. in the end of february . ah, now is the ukraine conflict escalates a 30 year old publication by george charles has resurfaced casting further dow on the western narrative that nato at its allies have no stake in the conflict. the bellingers piece discusses how crises could be manipulated by the u. s. for its own

goals, through the use of european soldiers as cannon fodder instead of americans. the united states would not be called upon to act as the policeman of the world when it acts. it would act in conjunction with others. incidently, the combination of manpower from eastern europe with the technical capabilities of nato would greatly enhanced the military potential of the partnership. because it would reduce the risk of body bags for nato countries, which is the main constraints on their willingness to act. this is a viable alternative to the looming world disorder. all the nato countries continue to insist they are not a party to the conflict, but this document from 1993, published by george soros is open. society institute gives a different impression. this document from 993 lays out how the united states and its allies might be interested in using countries across the eastern europe as proxy by russia. and they could incur the losses that might make the

conflict on popular if nato countries themselves were directly involved. and it was their own soldiers who were doing the dying. now, to coo and 2014, in which the united states over through the ukraine government and installed a fanatically anti russian group to power in kiev, seems to match what this document put forward. what we generally here in western media is that ukraine is simply under attack, turning for help from the democratic west. but jeffrey stack, the columbia university. he recently came forward and said that's not the case. the united states as overthrown dozens of governments. it definitely contributed to the overthrow of yanna, ko bitch. and i know this from the inside, not just from the outside. so i just want to be clear. i will bid, i know from top people involved in these issues is what i'm discussing right now. now the soros document not only matches the situation where

here is having us web smiled into it's i and being supplied with weapons by the united states. it also matches that the government of poland is very war mongering and hostile to russia. and furthermore, if you look at the situation, there are some estimates that the ukrainian casualty rate it, we may have seen over a 100000 dan. they are being carried out and people are dying to serve nato goal. that, yeah, has recently admitted this is what's been sad, shouldn't you, could i, isla, is any mindful today we occurring out nato's mission without the loss of their blood twist, but with the loss of ours. that's why they need to supply us with weapons. cathy and furthermore, we've had us officials admit that this is indeed the purpose of the conflict in ukraine. it's about serving nato's goals, the united states, age ukraine, and her people so that we can fight russia over there. and we don't have to fight

russia here. ultimately, i think this is a sound investment for us national security because not only are we defending a country from authoritarian aggression, not only are we taking one of our biggest geopolitical competitors down several notches in the process and we're doing it without us boots on the ground in harm's way. now it appears that the on a coach, government, and new grand wasn't the only government that the united states had. its eyes on were stirring up some kind of regime change and perhaps using it against russia. any place to here looking at, in terms of a potential regime change that could be stabilizer, region or, or the world will obviously a good one would be russia, but i don't think they're on the precipice there. i think things have to get worse economically and there have to be many more body bags and frankly, military losses before there's a change in the government. in, in moscow, we have a very casual statement from western leader that they seek to utilize the

lives of people across eastern europe. let them go out and die to serve their own political agenda. and it shows that it's more narrative where your brain is simply being targeted. it's a democratic country, just begging for help. it doesn't fit at all. this is part of geopolitical maneuvers. palisades ambassador to the e. u says european officials have condemned israel's atrocities against palestinians. he made the statement after a high level talks and brussels, the envoy also says the e u has opposed israel efforts to seize funds from palestinian authorities. according to reports, europe is preparing an aide, deal with a $325000000.00 grant to palestinians. meanwhile, palestine sworn ministry has called on the west shore pressure israel to stop the demolition of a village in the occupied west bank. the plea comes after residence came out to

protest against the destruction by israel. the crisis in the village which links the west banks north and south is part of it is really planned to destroy, so called illegal building. locals have voice their fury over the move. and what are people came to day to tell that's in the yahoo been give ear and all the extremist right wing officials that this land is palestinian. we did not allow the destruction of our hon. allah march. this government led by the and yahoo had been given or will go to the dustbins of history, and the palestinian flag will continue to fly on this land and will do that. we existed on this land before these railway government came and occupied it. a message to this railway occupation, we will not leave this place. this is all property and we will remain here. and i'm not, we are afraid that al con alack, mar may be demolished because have been fears, actions. his electoral campaign was to demolish al khan. alack!

mar and he is now forced to do so. the head of the palestinian national initiative party told us the real goal of the current israeli government is to expel palestinians from their lands. if i'm kind of like a necessity up out of subject to the process of being the other leaders and the government to you. if that happens, this will lead different loan because it will be perceived 1st as an act of beginning annexation of the ban of the section of the convention, an independent. this is also another that we can any potential to sticks. and so in my opinion, these are very danger the facts and this will be stopped immediately and they can be only with the start from the ground, as well as a serious national pressure on israel, threatening with voice divest men,

sanctions. if it does not stop the processes of ethnic cleansing and then, but more than that, this is really government include, the people who are described even in israel as they are very in their goal is really to destroy. i mean potential for being and they continue to declare that the whole family is fine, but the fun is exclusive for jewish people. so practically that if let's what, what can be called as jewish supremacy system. and this is a good thing is there we go. which will not be fulfilled, i hope is to expel from that land. and the question, not only, but also to come to life day and i did this and you why do you stand it? why didn't 55 years of military completion of the bank as

well as 75 years of ethnic, not as soon good faction was used against, allowing it to be above the low above international law. imbued the so this sponsibility in front of international law. this has led to the creation of the most extreme racist government in this field. and that is one of the direct result of this international behavior that continues to use double standards when it comes to posting image. those are the hour's top stories for more news head over to r t dot com. in 1943. what are the most horrifying non combat tragedies of world war 2 occurred far from the front lines, holes, jews, russians, and are. medians were accident, burnt alive, and brutally tortured, involved here more into the tragedy. next on our tea, stay with us. we'll see you back soon. ah,

i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, accept where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. at that point, obviously is too great truck rather than fear a job with artificial intelligence. real summoning with a robot most protective own existence with will. oh is your media reflection of

reality in the world transformed what will make you feel safer? isolation, whole community? are you going the right way or are you being that some with direct? what is true? what is great in the world corrupted. you need to descend a join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah

ah ah, the nuremberg trial is ervin von la housing, head of advert sabotaged section 2, testified on september the 12th 1939. up where chief admiral canada is with his structured by 3rd, ry foreign minister, a yell at him. von reuben truck. oh, it's necessary to reach out to the ukranian nationalists with whom intelligence had already had military contact to cause an insurgency in poland, which would have as its result, the extermination of poles and jews from the testimony of an arrested member of the organisation of ukraine.