a with a headline stories from that being said, posted malignant influence in the middle east to fueling the ukraine crisis. tehrani find itself today blamed for stirring up trouble across the world. least according to the u. s. secretary of state and is really prime minister. we've been holding talks in israel. malott comes in the wake of a drone attack, inner round it on the house, reportedly summoned a ukrainian diploma for questioning. after a talk, he of officials said attack home, the country is expected. i made claims it supporting rushes military, also with the countryside and expect them not to interfere in the bilateral relations between the pakistan and russia. pakistan foreign minister and say,

continued partnership between islam about and moscow will include new plans for an oil pipeline. the country faces the beer energies with the hunt for lithium. the german chancellor tours south america in an attempt to secure a supplies of the strategic material. but he's berlin, too late to the q. 3 nights in moscow. good to have your company say, let's get into our top story here on our tea international. iran's find itself as something of a punch bag as the u. s. secretary of state touched on in israel on monday. anthony blanket and been holding talks with prime minister benjamin netanyahu on both were quick to assign blame to tehran for all sorts of natured reasons. it's a time where many and international community i would say, most of the international community have seen the true face of iran. we've seen the

barbarism of this regime against its own people. they've seen how it exports aggression beyond its border and beyond the middle east. and i think there is a common consensus that this regime must not acquire nuclear weapons. we discussed deepening cooperation to confront and counter a rance destabilizing activities in the region and beyond. just as around as long supported terrorists that attack israelis and others. others seems now providing drones that russia is using to kill innocent ukrainian civilians. pamper, says i certainly rising as we hear these statements from these railey prime minister in the u. s. secretary of state, just days after an iranian military facility was attacked by drones to her and did not blame anybody officially, but they were careful reports in both american and israel and media that israel with the u. s. support may have been behind the so tag mcfall come in here to

israel blink and sat in an interview that all options are on the table regarding the ran in threads including military. so very, very bowling moldings. but i have to say that the ra tensions even closer blinking came to israel at the time of a major escalation and a dramatic tweet in these rally palestinian conflict that he himself called as circle of violence. america's top diplomats said that washington is committed to the idea of 2 state solution and that anything that contradicts this idea could be hung full to ease railey security in a long term and could damage israel's identity as a democratic jewish state. he also said that both sides should work together, hard to try to de escalate the situation and to ease the tensions. but unfortunately, so far we have only been witnessing the opposite. last thursday was the deadline day for palestinians in 2023. as 9 people were killed in the idea of military raid,

of the camp of jeanine in the northern part of the occupied west bank, including police, one civilian. it was followed by a deadly terror attack in east in jerusalem, but took the lives of 7 jews, a group of washer for his was attacked by a gunman at the time when they were coming back from a suburb prayer. after that, we heard a number of har statements from both the palestinian authority and israel with ramallah announcing. but they now cut security cooperation with jerusalem and israel expressing its firm determination to counter terrorist. and after jerusalem, lincoln is expected to visit both the west bank and gaza, where palestinian protests have already been announced against washington as w. send a policy. so the world is now watching closely whether this visit will be able to is the tensions on the ground or rather make it worse. well, as maria mentioned there, ron has reportedly summoned a senior to ukrainian diplomat. it follows controversial comments by an advisor to

ukraine's president after a drone attack on a military facility in central, around, in a post on twitter. the key of official said it was no surprise. a run was attacked because he claims that country militarily supports russia. in the ukraine con, like a lot going on there on my colleagues, research share and eager she doesn't talk through this statement or more than once, he craned warned a rum, the consequences of supporting aggression against crane. we far larger than the benefits from cooperation with russia. we don't know reason for the explosions at the reigning facilities, but as persian folk wisdom says, don't hum others and you won't harm yourself. we're logic is inexorable and murderous. it builds the authors and accomplices, strictly explosive nights in a rum drawn and missile production oil refineries. ukraine did warn you. the stories kind of weird and the details aren't really just in there yet. so we have

to, we have to tread carefully here. this what i mean to say, unlike what the ukranian advisor to the president to zalinski did when he went on twitter and just rambled on twitter and openly gloated about this attack against iran. and so really, it's no surprise that right now. apparently, the deputy ambassador is being summoned into iran for questioning because look at it from the following perspective. like iran is not attributing any blame, like iran is not blaming anyone for this just yet. nobody has claimed responsibility for the attack too, but really hardly a surprise that right now to iran is apparently summoning the deputy ambassador to do some explaining because they're saying, well, look, maybe they go like, well, do you know something that we don't know who is behind it, why did you say that it was a long time coming or stuff like that? so in terms of detail, again, they're very various costs. we do know we've seen pictures of a military compound in the town of it for hon. it's a town to the south of the capital to iran,

and it is also this is where the site producing iranian unmanned drones is in military drone as and they have been kind of boosting the production as of late. and we've seen some photographs with some very minor damage done to that particular compound and the rainy and saying that a bunch of drones were shut down by the air defenses. and just one just happened to crash on top of that compound. and again, a lot of a lot of that has been coming out on the story has been well just for it was fake news. and so we have to really tread carefully. but anyway, we do know that iran has, of course, condemned the aggression and has said that well the, this, these attacks, they will not stop iran and prevent iran from following its own diplomatic route heavily. hello. sorry that my height was following efforts by the enemies of iran's nation aiming to make you run insecure in recent months. this cowardly action has

been taken today. our country security will act with maximum potency to provide national security in the country. and such actions must not affect the will and intention of our experts in order to progress in the field of peaceful nuclear plants and see iran got in the wrong side of the west in so many so many areas and aspects as of late like it has been expanding its nuclear program, it has been accused of supplying military drones to russia, to a russia in its effort, in its military effort in ukraine. so really, that has been plenty of speculation as to who's behind these attacks. maybe it's israel, you know, the usual suspects when it comes to that part of the world and iran, maybe the united states, both nations have explicitly denied their involvement. however, listen, pentagon spokesperson brigadier general petri cry and said no us military forces were involved in strikes in iran, but declined to commend further. so he was saying that the facility was only slightly damaged to look pretty minor. frankly,

the israeli media is called the whole story, essentially a lie. and when you talk about potential culprits behind this, this drone attack and iran, ok. you say it could be some sort of clandestine israeli thing. could be the codes as well. it could be any kind of us sympathizing group in that part of the world, frankly. and the fact that ron hasn't singled anyone out and yet it's only right now, reportedly summoning the ukrainian ambassador in the country that i mean there are angles say we just are not getting a clear pitcher on, but what do you think is actually happening? well, it is difficult to make a judgment on that without being on the ground and watch and seeing it with your own eyes. but definitely it looks like the information attack against iran. it has been more of a, it has had a larger scale than what has been happening actually in terms of physical violence and physical damage. like initially when the 1st attacks happened, the reports that poured out of the region had been all over the place. some sources suggested that israel had begun a ground operation of all things in iran,

just stopping just short of will, you know, mewling whether or not that was the start of the war. and so there have been all sorts of claims that there were multiple missile attacks against multiple military compounds and to iran, in iran, again still oil refineries and oil facilities. and all of that were under some oil facilities. they were caught on fire, they were all the videos of them being a blaze. but again, iran has blamed the aftershocks of an earthquake for that. so again, it looks like the information campaign against iran and against iran has be in full swing right now. and by keeping silent by not jumping to conclusions and to just, you know, dishing out accusations by refraining from that. it seems to iran is trying to douse this whole hysteria and so that everybody has time to come to senses and then figure out what to do and would sorta retaliation. and more importantly,

who will have to bath boosting bilateral trade was the key focus of a meeting between the russian foreign minister and his pakistani counterpart on monday with the letter stating he expects other countries not to interfere in trade between the slum about and moscow. the words came in response to a question from the media on potential u. s. encroachment in that regard. deed, we've had and continued to have detail conversations on energy, cooperation, between buxton and russia. as you may be aware, pakistan faces severe and the energy of a crises and problems, and as far for them are the countries right, expect them not to interfere in the bilateral relations between the pakistan and russia. we absolutely will do whatever is necessary to provide our people oh, with the necessities that they to, they require, or both parties reiterated their commitment towards developing an enhancing

relations between the 2 countries, especially now as russia is seeking alternative markets as we know, and also park as soon as we heard from the foreign minister rick country right now is facing severe energy crisis and also severe economic challenges to which is something else he touched upon. so this is of course perfect timing for both countries to help each other out. and this is something that started 75 years ago. this may, ah, pakistan, and russia will celebrate 75 years of diplomatic relations. and let's not forget that in 2015 park, it's on em. russia agreed to build a multi $1000000000.00 gas pipeline tax food to run through august on transports, and russian liquefied natural gas from karate to lavoy was supposed to start in 2020, but it was put on hold because a western sanctions, and this is the status of the project right now, what was the 4 digits was of, but i do not. the issue is that as an advanced stage of development, and i'm sure that further progress will be done on the near future. in this regard,

i would like to dwell on what was said to my pakistani colleague regarding the u. s . guarantee that they will not interfere with our energy deals. of course, they will interfere the united states literally publicly without embarrassment, quite arrogantly declares to every one that it is impossible to make deals with russia, but to prevail. a majority of countries, including our colleagues and custodians, are guided by their legitimate national interests. both parties expressed a desire to continue dialogue for the shanghai corporation organisation was sergey live rover, reminded us once again that it is more of a reflection of the world right now. the reality because it's a multi polar platform, a pakistan foreign minister also said that develop relations are currently suffering through the negative consequences all the crisis in ukraine water. the threats of western sanctions will not intimidate them and will not stop them from continuing to do business with russia. the i g seat covered

a white gender encompassing a cock economic trait and especially energy cooperation, pakistan views. russia is an important player in the west, south and central asia, pakistan and russia have good cooperation on over on his thumb. we aimed to continue cooperation with our russian friends and realizing our common goals of peace and stability in a varnish thought. we also just discussed bilateral cooperation at multi lateral, for especially within the united nations and the shanghai cooperation. so mainly right now we're really waiting to see one pack swing. we'll get go in and also when the 2 countries will switch to national currency, something else that we heard about. so national currencies, when it comes to doing business, some interest in development. germany is interested in lithium production bouts,

the message from the countries chancellor on his tour of south american countries that are rich with the strategically important material. but we'll berlin have to join the back of the que german companies are very interested in expanding corporation, especially in the field of lithium. and we want to support chilly on that path to sustainable mining. schultz follows natural resources around the world like a group. he follows a rock band last year. he was obsessed with scoring gas, which wasn't a very good look for a guy who keeps openly fantasizing about ditching fossil fuels. so now he's in south america begging for lithium, which is needed to power his dream dreams as a key component of electric car batteries. for example, schultz is hitting up. she lay the world's 2nd largest supplier and argentina, which isn't too far behind the ra states that think that all raw materials come from china. but this is not true. men or raw materials in fact come, for example, from argentina or chilly, get cheap to china, upper says there and sold again. the question is,

can one milk move the procession of these materials, which creates thousands of jobs to those countries where these materials come from? yeah, guys don't send it to china, process it and generate on the pollution right here and then ship it straight over to me. come on, do you want jobs or not? jessie figured that talking about quote, sustainable mining of lithium means that people won't notice, the extracting lithium from the ground isn't actually sustainable. when it comes to you, the water that depletes leaving the soil destroyed, or that each ton of mind, lithium produces a 15 ton carbon footprint that's occurring to mit researchers. so, why don't countries like germany use erupts, lithium along the fact that it's nasty to get out of the ground? well, it simply doesn't have enough to meet its needs as it pushes electric cars as the way of the future headlines all over the western processor. and shelters visit to south america have focused on germany's lithium shortage and how the lack of supply negatively impacts berlin's ability to compete with china's electric vehicle

industry. european greens don't want mining in their own backyard, even if it's for green cars. yes, it's ok to mine it in latin america though, because there is going to be obviously green and sustainable. schultz says, unlike in europe, really, this is all about the use economic engine, germany scrambling to secure supply of critical resources that they've been getting from china. washington hasn't been shy about the fact that it wants its allies to cut trade ties with china, but that's a tall order for germany. and for europe, given that china produces more than 70 percent of the world's batteries and refined 80 percent of all critical minerals. and south america, trade ties with china are just expanding like with a new deal inc with bolivia, and that includes help to develop its lithium reserves, which are the largest in the entire world. so that means that germany actually end up having to deal with china any way to get any lithium in that place or in

elsewhere in south america. that would be an awkward conversation. may i speak to niger in china, comes up. that would be a little weird, but european commission president, queen ursula vander line, is kind of acting like a character of a j. r. r. tolkien novel in the sense that she wants the precious da da china controls the global process and industry almost 90 percent of rare earth and 60 percent. the fleet, him a processing, china, will, will identify strategic projects all along the supply chain, from extraction to refining from process and to recycling, oval build ups, her teacher cruisers to worry supply is at risk. so i guess it's bad when china makes resource deals, but good when europe does because europe would never, ever consider. it's mercantilist approach. a kind of neo colonialism, even though it's foreign affairs chief, joseph burrell, literally compared europe to a garden and the rest of the world to a jungle during his speech last year. speaking of which beryl has also recently got

off in blatant search of natural resources to africa, saying that he needs them for europe screen agenda. but the big question is whether these countries to which european leaders are going cap in hand, are willing to play on the west terms. when it seems to be pretty clear that they hold i good hand of cards. the french president, emanuel mackerel, has lost his credibility. thus the dumbing verdicts of the turkish liter ridge up, ty berto, on whose last night not his counterpart, claiming paris only house itself to blame for its fading influence in africa. actually the head of france, believe me, does not have the weight to be the head of that state. look there. exploiting african countries. right now molly is in a complete break with france right now became fast. so gave it one month. now it macro on has lost his credibility in the parliament. he's not honest. francis constantly losing credibility. his losing credibility in the international

community as well. just to put are the one's words into context empty from sentiment is currently on the rise and parts of the african continent including quino fast. so molly, i'm the central african republic. thousands of people recently rallied in the capital. why do calling for the expulsion of french troops from the country within a month? paris has already withdrawn the remainder of its forces from molly, the c or the t. r t. news channels, world editor, a large use of our believes president early seized from the source of instability in africa. they definitely are losing credibility at the international stage and they're losing ground as well. i mean, we're entered an era, right? the new powers. now we're seeing very competition with new countries like china, to yeah, russia entering the african market with much more to offer than the french much

more metric relations much more way to approach them to print shop in the past. when we look at the french history and the recent action side, france has been monopolizing brain has been exploiting africa for a very, very long time. use the french as a source of instability inside africa. when we look at the civil war, one could say that france was one of the major actors and major decision makers basically bringing about the libyan civil war and the follow mark for that b k. know the story to bring you today. the president of croatia have flung the e u plan or block. there are all of us, he puts it to end. the conflict in ukraine. zora milan of stress is not the current course of continual arms. deliveries only ensures that more will die, let you know. so i am again sending any lethal weapons to ukraine prolongs the war

. people are dying, and there is no plan. what is the plan, the disintegration of russia government change? i see in the a u parliament that some polish and lithuanian representatives are talking about tearing rusher apart. it's frantic. it's manic depressive behavior. yet the remark come of a conservative grouping is set to host an anti russia conference in new europe in parliament, topics up for debate slugger. this russia is supposed to the imperial ideology, the impact of the conflict on russian regions on the prospects for they d, imperialist zation on de colonization of the country. one of those behind the event as a former polish minister of foreign affairs on current european parliament member who recently wrote an article calling for russia, which she bronze the loss colonial empire to be destroyed and carved up the international community cannot take

a comfortable position on the sidelines waiting for developments, but must undertake a brave initiative that supports re federal. i zation of the russian state. taking into account the history of russian imperialism and the respect for the rights and desires of its nations. this terrorist organization, even if it is seen by many as an empire, should be dismantled. there are many possible solutions and strategies for a controlled, constructive and non violent, dismantling of the last colonial empire in europe. this project or for breaking up russia or to fragment jew particularly rush hour. each said is the dream of from birth must or russo phobic cure, err leaders of some european countries. but all, sor, we're united states or united kingdom. so we'd say we old saw to were destroy, rush us power is since you know g will be sort of consolation or, or ideology her o to, to concept rush are simply and do,

could on iser remind of peeper a fragment on if access to where you would resources of all your guys and under re resources ok. and finally this news, our turn. i didn't chin izzy as parliamentary runoff election has amounted to only 11 percent. according to preliminary data, a large number of voters and opposition groups boycotted the vote, claiming campaigning and the ballot itself wasn't carried. i fairly a dot of the huddle, almost 90 percent, or rather 89 percent of denisia voters has been ignored this piece of fear and refused to be involved and this good a tough scenario that does not represent them at all. she. oh maris do we hope to take turns yes, from good to better because tunisia has deteriorated for the worst in all economic and political fields. and we wish that those we voted for you give us their best and be in line with our choice. so as to how you said,

when he wrote his constitution, he ignored the committee. he had formed because he wanted the parliament to be a group of people in a close place who had no influence over the country situation. now the next parliament will have no control over the government. so then how will the impedes who are making promises to the people have the mechanisms to keep their promises. they have no authority in the government. well, less than 900000 of the 8000000 people eligible cast their slips. according to the head of the electoral commission, a number of independent organizations observing the voting process reported a lack of transparency and some of the polling stations unclaimed. they weren't given access to termite data. now on december 1st round vote incidentally termite was even smaller at 8.9 percent. no significant reason for that is believed to be parliament. having its power is limited under legislation introduced by the changes in president in 2021. indeed,

discontent with the leaders policies brought thousands of protesters to the chimneys in capital streets earlier this month. a dozen years after raleigh's in the north africa nation called a chain reaction in the region resulting in the sony or a spring box in western powers. praise that protest for bringing about suppose democracy and transparency to the middle egyptian academic doctor seed. so deck believes the uprisings fail to deliver that change as people have been hoping some political accuracy in tunisia, local inflammation, and many offspring countries. they feel that politics have between the provis performances and the chances it was going to provide that can to tuition is also feeling and not happiness was the situation. so there was general apathy in the country club, the parliament,

to the president of the opposition. and so nobody can claim and justify what is happening is that the people of fed up with politics in general and next examiner speaks exclusively with jemila said, deaths alamahood, wife of the iranian president and psychology professor at one of the country's leading universities international relations ethics cultural resistance and western standards all on the agenda in the lie the discussion say close for that good by for ah patel. i'm also the, let me start with the issue that has been a lot and the headlines recently, an, i mean the, the tragic death of our mos armine, which sparks ah, a reaction not only in this country, but also a broad, wider thing. these are tragedy costs, such an last sing and such

a broad response public response. and i am a man who's i believe it with your permission. i would like to discuss this issue in depth. the thing you referred to as a tragic death and the news of which resonated throughout the world is actually a new form of what we call the policy of intimidation. says a policy that america's carrying out against my country. iran is the very essence of american foreign policy is intimidation, says over the past 50 years, the u. s. has always sought to scare our people into submission. they've sent their navy to our shores as her showing off their warships and their missiles. well, they've forced us into flawed and unfair agreements with them going on. it is always been about intimidation. however, what you mentioned is just a new form of the same policy that are more by doing this. the u. s. wants to say to us, love the service,

i'm right here in your very cities. i can take terrorists to the streets and set cars on fire. so they want us to submit to surrender lawyers. this is a component of policy of intimidation that america has deployed and is pursuing against iran to show a skewed picture of our country to the world. i imagine that you too now have a similar experience of dealing with america. as it promotes false narratives about russia to the rest of the world, america exercises its power through the media and others. mass media is used to push intimidating narratives and falsehoods. that's their modus operandi. or if you want to sell weapons, make a country afraid of something and no buy it off. you. so americans to bully our neighbors into being afraid of iran. they do the same to the global community. they want people to be scared. i agree with you that the west has always,

or has long used propaganda as a, as a to against countries that they disagree with. and that happened with regards to russia. there augusta run and with regards to many other countries. but if you look at the particulars of the story, you know, our young, 22 year old woman who was detained in tac, ron, it happened she was visiting her brother. she was out of town, and her family never got a chance to see her again. now i know there are many speculations about what actually happened, that her family, for a long time was very bitter about the way how this whole situation was handled. i wonder as, as a woman, as a mother of 2 daughters as a university professor, i'm sure you have many similar students. what was your personal reaction knob to the weight was played out and used but to the actual tragedy to what happened to that girl to that.