bearing for intelligence officer, scott ritter, analyzes the possible influence. the new weapons on the battlefield depends on the quantities in the timing right now. what it, what appears is that these tanks and these aircraft are not going to be a sufficient and quantity. and the, the way they're going to be committed will be piece meal. so 14 here, 10 here. 14 here. um, if that's the case, they'll have 0 impact on the battlefield. but if you crane is able to rapidly acquire these tanks and they arrive at the same time, together with a, you know, trained personnel, then the outcome will be a massive escalation of the fighting. um, you know, russia has made it clear that if the west provides these tanks and these aircraft that russia will be compelled to respond and it won't just be more tanks and more aircraft, or, i don't think russia's talking about nuclear or weapons. but there are significant

conventional weapons that russia has yet to employ. ah, and i, i think we'll see an escalation in the fighting and more dead ukrainians. more did and displaced ukrainian civilians, more destroyed infrastructure and tragically, it also means more dead russians. but, you know, i think russia understands what's at stake here. russia has mobilized sufficient resources and rushes prepared to adapt and deal with whatever escalation the, the west attempts. it's not going to change the final outcome, which i continue to believe will be a decisive russian military victory. that was the weekly with the hour and week sob stories coming up. you will never erase russia from the world map. we are a major player, that's the message from russia's envoy to the un and an exclusive interview, or he also addresses foreign policy as well as western threats and much more up next on

r t c as in ah ah ah hi alex santos. i'm here to play with you, whatever you do. do not watch my new show. certainly why watch something that's so

different. my little opinions that you won't get anywhere else. welcome to please. i do have the state department, the cia weapons makers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations. choose your fax for you, go ahead, my change and whatever you do. don't watch my show, stay main street because i'm probably gonna make you uncomfortable. my show is called direct impact. but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way. mm. thing for a ship african who, what is the best time to do on the actual the i do about them. this is on the vocal . believe it was of it, a complicated with what i to school for car wasn't report backwards but something, something that might seem important to me. a national krinski part of

it, which it, it said to jeff. so i knew the minimum is gone, can be a comma, a utah vehicle, or somebody at the community that they've got a lovely not result. like it's supposed to start out. affected door only out of the july, the media with us. that's clear, but, but then what's the routing just leaving it right now for you to facilitate them during the summer? because a, we didn't, i would show capital much with career was it was the case then you paid us over for you will go that they should receive a notice to pick up and that were still a, a

ah, last has got some kind of a bombing their own good perception that even a he'll get, they are putting a game in every ever seattle for life, but they are giving him the opportunity to share your views. not only important in some ways, but also in the universities add to the young. well, i'm making a villain, but that is definitely not the give. and oh, do you know that he understand what is good for damnation? oh, which is good for you to see with ah,

well mister ambassador, i do wanna thank you for this great opportunity to speak with you and also extend your greetings for the day of russian diplomacy. so i will begin by asking you recently we heard that zalinski, the ukrainian leader, has said that the minsk agreement was simply to was simply a concession. that's the language he described it with. and he went on to say it cannot be implemented. we've also heard from angela merkel. she has said that it was simply a tactic to buy time for the ukranian army. so my question is, does that change the possibility of future negotiations and on what terms would russia be willing to engage in such talks? first of all, thank you very much for your congratulations and due to the survey means for us, this is a day or remembering the tradition, so be russian. so it and russian diplomacy and well look to remember, oh,

on what you asked me. i think you already gave an answer partly at least indeed we heard this citizen statements by zelinski, by a medical by you a bible on the bipartisan himself. which simply betrayed extra confessed that means agreement. so what a hoax to buy time for you cream besides means agreement. so use the keys of the failed you implement because have they been implement faithfully? nothing. what were witnesses they would be happening, but they were not meant to be implemented. so when people say this started dealing with some will might be, will medina, mercy, who say you are on chronology that started 9 years ago. 9 years ago we were begging you to listen to us. nobody at it. now we've heard from a number of western leaders that they think the only way this work and is with the

defeat of russia. so if that is the town, is there any hope for negotiations or peace? they're not just saying that it can only end with the end of russia. they're saying they're talking now about dismembering russia. they're talking about destroying russia. they are, they are a talking talking are some of the officials, high level officials are talking about the russian leadership. what's that where they should be, where it is now, some state things go beyond the beyond more just simply diplomacy, but, but serialized, civilized communication or on a possibility of negotiations. opposition is very clear. we stated numerous times ah, we stated the goals of our, our special military operation. what the design tool we were already and still

already foresee as negotiations which were interrupted so see stop by, but ukrainians, or of course on the, on the order from their masters and sponsors in april last year. besides, there are numerous statements by the ukrainian high level officials on how they see a possibility of negotiating was russia. besides, that is a law had decreed that was signed by president zelinski himself, where he and where he prohibited himself to deal with the current russian leadership. ah, so we do not see any seated attempts from the cleaning side to engage the negotiations and all those initiatives that were hearing from them on, on the piece plan on very assignments. so this is frankly joke. oh, besides, we know for good that the they're not calling the shots, those who can enforce them for cds negotiations. or they lever

in this country somewhere in europe or on one of the piles across the, the english channel. if they are willing to do so, they will engage, but so we don't see any willingness on the bottom responses of give to go to her negotiations. was russia a and her do it, do it to citizen? and besides, besides, we are not negotiating with divisions of ultimatums, but for you now at the united nations security council, you have repeatedly pointed out that pouring more weapons india is not going to bring peace. it's going to prolong the suffering, prolong the deaths. but we hear the u. s. representative, just continue to dismiss everything you put forward about the danger of lethal aid and weapons going in to kia. do you think that there is any hope for waking up the last about the long term consequences and what's going to result from pouring all

these weapons into ukraine? there is always a hope for waking up, but a, i'm afraid they, they're still fast asleep on that matter. we just said we had the security council briefing, which we requested cluster of this week. in fact, earlier this week on the i'm supposed to clean and where does it leave an enormous efforts money that pours into grain, that feeds the conflict. you know that we invited the roger what to so for that briefing them and there were doubts that he could be a brief on that better, which he brought, he could, and quite a, quite ably i would say we, he was not the pro ration when he spoke he spoke from what you think we never when we invite brief us to the security council will never dictate them condition on what they should be saying, not writing scripts for them. you had what,

what happened the at the meeting? indeed, to we're so far, this is a conversation between the deaf and the blank. now, there is talk of the western countries convening some kind of war crimes tribunal against russia. and if that were to take place, would it be possible for russia to then bring things to the front and go back to 2014, talk about the atrocities that have been committed. i, you know, talk about the repression of the orthodox church and other activities going on in ukraine. would this be possibly a mistake where things they don't want brought into the conversation would suddenly be a topic we've been raising these issues all is 9 long, 9 years a consistently we continued to do so. but so you have for to recognize there is an iron wall, a night of media will i would say that we are trying, we're doing our best to bring that that to the people recently. lots of our not so

long ago we held the so called a formula meeting on what is happening in don't bust then what has been happening there in not just all these years within this months, because in this months the shelling of doors both residential areas. anthony, i intensified enormously. i 16000 in the couple of last months. ah, if i'm not mistaken. we brought witnesses live witnesses who, who gave their personal accounts on what is happening. all is ignored. they read their mantises from the script, are not willing to listen to anything. yes, many of those who are committing crimes in the grain today on the part of the givers you should stamp. and we are saying about that the officially that we're noting down all the crimes that the give resume is committing against its own population basically. and the gains the people of numbers. ah,

we will not forget it. and they will one day with another stem throw for the graves they committed to including on the battlefield fund. when they usa, usa civilians, as a shield with other uses as a shoe. they do all the time when they commit crimes against the prisons of war. even those outrageous things like what happened to a couple of days ago with the killing rabbit repeating the killing a blank shots of the russian prisons. a war is a, is largely a glory ignored by the worst of what the office of human rights was, was forced to recognize that it looks a geniune and the deserves being investigated. now in western leaders talk and they frequently reference this rules based global order. that's the other thing they constantly are speaking about. my question for you is how is that kind of rhetoric

and his talk of a rules based global global order? how is that viewed in south america in asia, in africa? how is the world reacting to the words of us and western leaders? we, we've been speaking about this settles based world order, long time. are saying that it's not international, which is a in woodard primarily in the u. injured. not many listen to our citizen the time. but now i think the, the opinion in those countries, the to that you mentioned sir, is changing. we just recently celebrated the 20th anniversary of the of colin powell v o. in the security council, which you may consider to be the beginning of the current phase of this new rules based international order. we are saying to our partners that what is happening

today? ah, you should look at it carefully. amen. the said to day they came after russia. busy tomorrow they will come after any country that will be not marching in june with those who sinking the on the world. and let me follow up by asking, what do you see the role of russia being in, in a multi polar world that is emerging. the world is much bigger than, than the so called collect to west of the world in africa. the world is a great the you asia, the world is latin america. and indeed, indeed, the world is becoming more multi paula, multi paula: perhaps it becomes less and less multilateral on the parts of at least a certain group of countries. but the role of russia, you will, you will never erase ashley from the world map whether somebody alexis on the russia will be always a major playing the world politics. okay, now let me ask about the un security council itself. how do you assess the work

that they've been doing? i know there been calls for reforming the un security council and the representation on it. where does russia stand on all of this? we are not subjecting the reform of the security council of that process goes long time, more than 20 years. and that is not the. that is not the a problem over of russia or anybody else blocking it that are such grave contradictions between the positions of groups of countries. an individual covers that we cannot chiva anything that could be could be construed as consensus or sometime shortly. so to say, but we are saying that we, we, we recognize that the world to do it today. and the security council does not represent fully the world today that has changed since the time when the security council was established. we say that that such such religions as,

especially african asia and latin america under represented there. and that should be, that should be rectified. we do not see any of that value in adding to the security council, especially as primitive members of the countries of the so called collect to west because we have enough of them already. and we don't see that they will contribute to the work of the security council any anyhow differently from what we're seeing today. but again, i say the processor, the so called into governmental negotiations on the security council reform are going on in the general assembly. but so far we are not the somewhere we get where we can, we didn't, we were where we can say we can the chief in chief agreement, so on this reform in, in the near future. now, earlier in our conversation, you referenced that horrendous video of the execution of prisoners of war. and it's

now verified, it's authentic, this crime was committed. what will it take for western media to kind of start acknowledging the horrible things that he is doing? do you see any possibility of widespread acknowledgement of these atrocities? i mean, is western media just not going to acknowledge these realities. perhaps the other canola jing that, sir within themselves, but they're simply ignoring its own on the mass media. if you thought perhaps, or of course, remember her such sure, such a horrible stages as you, as the so called massacre and witcher or the killing of people at the railway station, grammar tours are on crowd those. these unfortunate people were, were, were heaped up killed by the ukrainian me so which was on before to now they're not talking about that at all. but in the public opinion of it is the russian crime.

nobody looks for the, for the details. what happened? how it happened, what was throwing up, so i'm not very optimistic that this to her and describes, will be brought to the western public her by the west media. now, recently i, you talked about how western leaders were objecting to cooperation between molly and russia and the you use the term neo colonial to describe their attitude. why is it that they seem to be so bothered about russia's growing relationship with africa? and can you describe that relationship for us? the relationship between russia, america, with african countries, where many partners that is growing, and that the causes jealousy on the pots of those companies who consider that that to be their back yet, i will give you one example. i think i will not betray anything secret. now by now, a couple of years ago, at the high level segment of the general assembly minister lovegrove was meeting

the current chief european diplomats was edburg, who distinguished himself recently was some comment. is that the arrest conservation among the public and then the barrel was asking minutes to love her. why are you dealing with my why molly's trying to to, to engage with you to which minister laurel said, look at this is a sovereign country. they decide with whom to do if they chose to deal with russia, that's their sovereign choice. to which the chief european diplomat said to him the following place. don't mess up in our book yet. can you imagine that while, while it is repeated in western media, frequently that russia is to blame for the global food crisis, that it's all russia's fault? how do people see this around the world? there was a meeting recently her as a recent, as a late january this year of

d. e. u. comedian agriculture, where they gave where they gave a quite a saba analysis of their problems in the agricultural sector. which is related to the bus demi to inflation, to energy and food prices, to their hiding green transition, etc. so when it comes to themselves, they are able to describe it to describe with a, probably enough while for the public, they blamed the current foot crisis on the in fixed by the climate. we are saying consistently that the put crisis didn't start one year ago that that was the result of their own policies which preceded that at least 3 or 5 years. or including massive or printing of her or her money by the major economies. including the agrees to current policies on food, the supplies, et cetera. so of course,

this crisis is not the result of for over what was happening last year. now if you are referring to the brained deal or other, not the grain, you were least of wool agreements because there's construct, they consist of 2 parts. one is the green deal for ukraine, and the other is memorandum on the extra russian food and fertilizers are from the russian federation. so the, the grain deal is working full steam. ah, it's already more than $20000000.00, a dance of various grays that for exports. it's from ukraine and they are not flying to the most needed countries are mostly yes, some portion, but very small ones like 3 percent of those who are really struggling with hunger at the same time. not a single grain. huh. in singular and very little fertilizes,

were exported. so according to the 2nd part of the deal. yes sir. the 2nd that a gentleman i recognized is doing his utmost to, to, to, to solve it. but he's a, he's a knocking against the wall because there are so many sanctions are there. they keep saying that the agreement for to my there's a are not on the sections. yes. they are not formally, but friday's insurance is, but banking and financial transactions are you named are. so that does not also contribute to solving the food to crisis in the world, and at main exacerbated because one thing is the full crisis and the, the, the, the, the food itself. the other thing is the future harvest, which depends a lot on the 30 loaves and fertilizers, are russian fertilizers, which are, which are paramount for the future. future to commercial production. right,

and i believe russia at this point is being blocked from sending fertilizer to syria. and i was wondering if this is actually being addressed at the united nations. it's not that of asha was blocked from sending fertilizers to cedar. it is the open 8th is not willing to do so because because these fertilizers are considered to use it. sure products which come on the, the, the, some famous caesar like by the, by the united states. yes i that was the secretary general and asked him to help solve that problem because students needed badly, especially now in this vic times of the living through. but so far so far, no, they have not been ship. and part of the grain deal and the negotiations was that there should be a lifting of all sanctions affecting russian agriculture. but this, from what you're telling me doesn't appear to have been implement, you know, is there any hope for this being implemented whole was always there, but with the,

with the multitude of rules and regulations. so on sanctions these countries introduced in, particularly, you know, they say they, they made some delegation delegations, but in fact, when, when it comes to the national level, it is not implemented. then. secondly, that is, this so called a compliance when the companies are simply freights to be sanctioned themselves, who are dealing with russia, even if it is in their view, legal, although it is a legal person. well, i want to thank you for your time. i know you are very busy and you're, you've got quite a, a task at hand. you know, standing up to all these lies at the on security council. i wanna say it's really been an honor to speak with you and thank you very much for taking time out of your day to go. this was purpose. thank you a a

ah at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according to modern historians. in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local be both any resistance to the british was answered with doubled cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women and children are shot whenever they can be met with squatter, henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england,

in $1846.00. australia's bass is rightly described as blood soaked and races. if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent. then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had decreased del 100000 people despite the indisputable historical facts. the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against the aborigines has not been resolved so far. at this hour, american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free its people. and to defend the world from great danger whose

we will bring to food and medicine supplies and fleet with as got some kind of a bombing, their own good perception that even and he'll get they are putting the zalinski as a hero and bring him in a life, but they are giving him the opportunity to share his views. not only important in some ways, but also in the universities and to the younger people are making a president of put in as a villain. but that is definitely not the case. and do you know that he understand

what is good for their nation, which is good for you to see with ah, the wagner group head says his fighters have taken control of the town of cross naya gora a key point of defense near audio, most also known as about an identified object spotted over canada is shot down by the u. s. air force that the mid tensions simmering between washington and china over its weather balloon crossing us borders. over $26000.00 are confirmed dead after catastrophic earthquakes. hit turkey and syria. as the decimal continues to rise and both countries struggle to cope with the fallout and a bomb shell report by an american award winning journal.