this was on the, on the billions says to submit a, you do what i see the student both use the little gear motivation. so do you do gumbo sub ah, without help headlines right here in austin international as a nato plans to create a fleet of spy satellites, to provide for the props military mission, russia. those, as you've used them as a law full target, if indeed they used to help you frame on the battlefield. also ahead for corporate media in the united states, still telling the story of your brain, they started from invasion. they don't know why to invade. if they don't know that the ukrainian government was bombing those people for the 3 years and slaughtering them, they don't know that there been with nazis literal nazis and people have no idea that that's what happened for an out american political commentator jimmy door

explains what the west narrative on a conflict in ukraine is missing from the program. new delhi says india state it. democracy is under threat by george soros that calling the hungarian american businessmen to quote an economic war criminal. ah. and so we don't just reporting your news or what are you into national roles or bringing you both sides of today's stories, something typically missing and western coverage. nonetheless, let's get straight into it right now. so us, lead nato is now planning to use commercial satellites for spy purposes. a nicknamed a keeler. the orbital fleet is aimed at providing support to nato's military missions. of his comments as russia has accused the west of launching yet another alms race in space will cease rachel blevins. now joining us here live and it's

friday afternoon here in the studio. talk more about that. it's rachel. great to see you as always. but here we are looking at a new type of spy fleet, new nato plans. what do we know? how to write nato is now advertising their plans for spy satellites, which they say are all about data collection and really streamlining their data sharing for the entire nato alliance. now what's notable about this plan is that it will involve around 16 nato member states, as well as finland and sweden, even though they're not officially part of the alliance that we've heard from nato . in recent years, they've complained about russia and china in space. the alliance says that they're concerned about being, as they put it restricted in outer space, but they're justifying this new plan by saying that it all comes back to this based policy that they adopted back in 2019. now, as all of this is happening, we've also heard from nato secretary general. he was talking about the ways in which the alliance is assisting ukraine right now. and he said that they plan to

continue using commercial satellites for military purposes. despite all of the warnings that we've heard from russia, and when you talk about warnings referred from russia, i can only expect what kind of response you've had from moscow to regarding this a new fleet of spy satellites, and any would, well russia, foreign ministry is again warning that this conflicts could get escalated all the way to outer space and that it could end up with civilian infrastructure being targeted because of the way that it is being used by nato. take a listen to the latest statement. the risks of turn an outer space into military front have taken shape. civilian infrastructure components provided to ukraine for military purposes in outer space may become a legitimate target for retaliation strike. now at the same time, the head of a military space academy in russia is also speaking out and saying that there are legitimate concerns that these new satellites from nato are going to be used, your target russian satellites. and that it could disrupt communications as

a result. here's what he said. did miss each it mother was small combat spacecraft . we can be deployed as part of multi satellite low orbit communication systems, such as one web star link. this poses a threat of a space attack on critically important satellite of our country. this pertains to communications and telecommunications. what does that mean? it means the possibility of losing control over strategic nuclear forces. we cannot be allowed to beach with us. so there are rising concerns that civilian company is, could end up becoming a part of this entire conflict. as nato shows no signs of backing down somebody. obviously we've got thousands of satellites over the plan is at the moment and, and many of them a commercial satellite companies may have a have they responded to any of this? well, we have heard from space ex, recently. now we have to remember starling satellites have been a very popular option for nato use in ukraine. but space that came out last week,

and they said that they are taking steps to prevent their satellites from being used by the ukrainian military to control their drone. now space act says that the satellites were never meant to be weaponized. at the same time. we also have to remember that space act has privately shipped thousands of satellite terminals to crane, the majority of which they have donated. but now they're coming out and they're saying that those satellites and the internet they provide are only supposed to be used for humanitarian purposes. however, when it comes to the ways in which space x is actually going to take action to make sure that those satellites aren't used for military purposes will that remains to be seen. yeah, because i mean, you were talking about stalling that rachael. and as i understand, you also said this that they, they've kind of reduced the ability of satellites that have been used for the complet in ukraine. apparently they've kind of been back pedaling because at the end of the day, there are countless ukrainian officials who say for example, when we use the u. s. made highmark rockets, washington tell us where to shoot them. so we get all adjusted logistics from

washington. washington can get goes the distance from these satellites as well, because those high mos rockets are almost always hitting civilian regions and east ukraine. all right, so they, we are nato now plans to create some sort of spy fleet up in the skies above us. rachel blevins, thank you. thank you. and while attentions rise and space nato has been out for a while on the ground now by provoking the conflict in ukraine. well, that's not me saying that that's american political commentator jimmy door, latest episode of going underground with action return. see the to discuss the routes of the conflict and how ukrainian forces have long been talking civilians in don't pass. you can watch the folding to be all day saturday for now though, is a bit of what's to come. but they're doing so they're unwittingly using the american that the people of ukraine has cannon fodder and a proxy and economic proxy war. what we did was provoke this invasion,

and the german chancellor just admitted that we provoked this invasion in 2014 the united states over through the democratically elected government of ukraine. why did they do that? the people who say that i'm aiding russia somehow, i've been propagandized, they don't know the history of what's happened. they don't know. nieto is an offensive course. natal provoked this invasion ukrainians, their own citizens, ukraine government was killing and bombing them. people don't know this, they don't know the history because when the corporate meeting in the united states still tells the story of your brain, they started from pollutants invasion. they don't know why, but invaded, they don't know that you gradient government was bombing those people for a straight years and slaughtering them. they don't know that there have been with nazis literal nazis and people have no idea that that's what happens. so you can call me anything you want. there's only one way to end this war. it, everyone knows that the you bring war is going to end with the negotiation. so we have to get people at the negotiating table right now. nato doesn't want joe biden,

doesn't want to negotiate, and he wants to keep this going on. he wants to keep people being killed in ukraine, so we can bleed russia economically and that plan isn't working. what we're doing is russia is now becoming closer and closer with china, and they're going to become the new center of economics in the world. i don't understand why the people will wake up to this because, but the reason why they will wake up to this is because they don't get to see shows like this or hear voices like me. they only heard voices from the parole or military industrial complex bought media so good to have your company focused program today. quote, an economic war criminal wants to break india's democracy. that is the warning from the indian minister of unions who says that george soros is plotting to intervene in the country. the man who broke the bank of england, a man who is known and designated, sold by

a nation. as an economic war, criminal has now pronounced his desire to break the indian democracy and the government of angry. they've hid boxing the sources trying to target in dallas democracy. we hard, the indian municipal smithy. ronnie was really angry there who held a press conference just while back no source has said to be the fees behind the regime change attempts in, in the i'm remember next year or 2004. india is due for a general election now sort of the 92 year old american given billionaire has questioned indian prime minister. in more these silence or the of donnie control was see post the hindenburg report in the it's an interesting case. it's democracy. but he's li, the no and her mobile the is no,

them are correct. moody and resist going down the closer lives faith. you seem to try and more the sign and understand it, but you will have conflict questions from foreign investors and in parliament. and then the hindenburg had said that the need to hold the largest court in corporate history. and of course all the dani group had hit back out the us basically church form. this was a 413 page document that the donnie group came with that rejected 88 allegations really that were pressed by indian bug against the dani group. now of basically what the donnie group said that he didn't book had clear intent of profiteering of the cost all saw the she whole those as well as the public

investors. but who is george sorrow is he's arguably one of the most controversial figures in the world. he's known of a financial group by some by boast. he's known for his malicious influence, a billionaire who is known to move mock. it's really, he's also called the man who block the bank of england. he's in fact the master manipulation of global master, as he's known by many now india of course, is extremely angry, and they're saying that they are always listen to any lecturing by this man. let's take this conversation further now. crossing like a gordon. shake. jerry political analyst and a former spokesman for the thea john at a party, a very warm welcome to you. so thank you for joining us here on the international today. what, what do you make this a source coming out against the indian prime minister and arrange a modi calling him saying that he's not a democrat? what do you, what do you make?

is that what's his position there and are his allegations meddling in india is affairs, as claim definitely is trying to model. but 1st of all, everybody must not be fully. this is as follows. and this is l. e. he's a list of look at the list, is the call on board him. done any the great market own living all to 5 minute political market. do you want that? he wanted to speak leave that the government must have gone on if you want so that he can make it go up any doesn't on he's be will. he won't, could cheat in the gym at more abuse guys up, rotting in the orbit. ready no more be a sub, but we could go on the internet for the nation in both for the benefit pick up in the lead,

but they call them not for the most popular people, not trust, didn't work. i've been going to do what it was. this is you didn't shake, jump in the country. i'm so sorry for interrupting you, but just, i'm just trying to understand what the so called threat of george soros is to india . and if i understood you correctly, you're saying that so are also interested in that of regime change. definitely one would think they want to, they do change and they want a refund will be done for you. and that will be not a one, no, not from different people. he does what is it, what, what indian for the nation. and secondly, you should look for that this sort sure. and see hunt on the market. right now. the most is terrible. market more profiting

market for the other end. and so he uncertain it be in the indian market and he won't listen. i don't think that is that is what he's getting all think. well, i mean, george saw somebody he certainly known for having or should have suspected of having skeletons in the closet, even the well, i mean, even even his home, even his home country hungry has ultimately condemned him as well. at the end of the day when you get it man with that much money, he gets a lot of people in his back pocket. gold rush show you the fit. even with the fair name, his name is also fit. well, there it is, mr. show you. i appreciate having you on the program here at our t into now geo political. i listen for my b j. p spokesman, thanks for joining the top. western medical professionals of oat israel to end it's blockade of gaza. they said in a joined letter, the restrictions on imports jeopardizing the lives of palestinians and the western

powers continue to turn a blind eye to the ongoing crisis as an occupying power, controlling policy and life. israel continues to flower, its subrogation for international humanitarian law is really impunity continues to be bolstered by the shameful inaction of the international community in this situation. or israel imposed a blockade on the gaza strip by land, air, and sea. more than a decade ago. the air is divided by fences and walls, and people are regularly shot in skirmishes in the borderlands. locals on both the israeli and palestinian size of the border. they've all been expressing outrage over the conflict and they're trying to build bridges of their own. meantime, one or 2 crew has visited an exhibition by jewish and palestinian painters demonstrating that desire of peace and that part of the world. they leave just one kilometer apart but have never met. they capture the exact same landscape with cameras from different sides of the fence that separates them. between us is the

name of an exhibition by 2 photographers. live in an opposite size of these railey garza border, a jewish lady and a young palestinian man doing us. we have a firm, but there is a lot of thing that we have to girl in there. this is the main idea that they want to show you. but she has partner hides his identity for security reasons. she's the only one who knows his real name, but not his exact whereabouts. they exchange text messages, never video or voice. this is what he sent for the opening of the band. i hope that with the help of my photos, the israel society and the whole world will know that the gaza strip is not only a place of raucous missiles, but a place worth leaving him in dazzled people, simple love life and not fighters and tourists galaxies ruled by the hammock, milton group considered terrorists by israel. every time israel does or says

something, hammers doesn't like the group fires. miss. how's an easier response and kind the night before we met battier, besides exchanged rockets again, people living near the border high in a high risk area and to miss our banker is a scattered all over. every house had a so called security room, $45.00 to survive, a rocket attack. but you won't see any of that in the picture is displayed here. as both artists say, what's the point? we said a lot of time to live heel. it's a $95.00 fill cent off heaven in fayetteville, sent off hill with delight all much less the hill and more the heaven. it's not always oh, with our ends, but we tight all to make it. it wasn't always like this after israel captured garza him the 6 day war in 1967. it was relatively open until 20 years later,

when the violent palestinian uprising known as the 2nd intifada and the mountain cross border violence, made israel erect multi level protection along the frontier. hope is something battier and her partner hoping to plant or strengthen through their works. in the 1st week, 1500 people visited the exhibition and share it pretty similar feelings can be a cooperation between us and the other side that there is there. they're also good people that think about peace and they're not. they just stay and want to fight and who knows? maybe maybe we'll see more exhibitions like this that we, we, we, a author come in the halls of the, of the wall that we, we fighting on to time when we are expecting that the governments of both sides

will realize that we can, we can live together because the people, the ordinary people, live to live together and to build a new future inspired by her 1st success. but here seems ready to think about the next step. armed with her phone. she walks along the border with a mission to build a bridge across what may look like an obese from this israel and community called kid boots. you can clearly see garza very close, but the 2 are separated by an intricate series of fences, trenches, barbed wire, and walls. letters from both sides, one to make sure they are properly divided from one another. despite these obstacles, projects like between us, give a voice to the ordinary people from both sides and the message is simple enough. they have more in common than what meets the eye. and most important of all, they want to leave in peace. richard ocean are

r t reporting from gas border just about 20 past the hour here at moscow. so good to have you with us in his a latest interview, bill gates expressed a plan to fight digital misinformation with artificial intelligence. when analyzing, for example, the capital riots. now this, while eli mosque describes a i as one of the biggest risks to our world, as we know. i'm certainly concerns about political polarization. and i know the u. s. situation best of all. you'll have to take artificial intelligence into consideration to solve the digital misinformation. this will change our world. one of the biggest risks to the future of civilization is a i, it's both positive or negative and has great, great promise, great capability. with that comes great danger. i think we need to regulate a i safely, frankly, it is, i think actually a bigger risk to society than cars or planes were medicine. but it seems like a,

i does not have a 100 percent neutral ideology as a newly popular service chat, g d p has a denied to make a story about job items, scandal riddled son hunter. instead, it protected him users of the, of no to the liberal bias of the service. however, big high tech companies like microsoft are already using chat g p t in this search engines. well, that's course live now to luca longo, an artificial intelligence, a researcher engineer and found over robots dot i and web site. excuse me, that would be i beg your pardon, luke longo, and a 1000000 raj. i beg your pardon. that's the founder of ro, boss, dot i, and both of you gentlemen, very well. welcome to you. thanks for coming on the program today. so bill gates expressing a plan, get this to fight digital misinformation with an artificial intelligence. look at long go over to you. does that raise any concerns or is it a good thing?

do you think? well, as i said yeah. so again, this idea, sorry guys, gentlemen gentlemen, do beg your pardon, luke longo, we'll go 1st to you and then we'll come to mister raj, luca over to you a good thing or a bad thing from gates. i think in some sense his plan is there is a resume or is it reasonable? and if we think who wants to have a pre craft controlled by his information on line, i guess nobody. so his plan to fight against these injustices is kind of a movie my, my highs or i but ok, but mr. mr. mr. raj, you seem to be able to make a comment on this. what, what are your thoughts on bill gates? say, what is it a good idea? no, i strongly believe it's a very bad idea, because eventually it's something b i, b, it's a pivot point of missing the mission. i'm using ai to counter misinformation,

and political polarization is a threat to humanity. and i scroll against this idea and i firmly believe being a i developer. my company is, was a, i don't, i strongly believe it's a, it's a super dangerous idea. and i completely against emotion. yeah. well, i mean, look over to you in on mass says this is a huge threat to the future. your saying using ai. it's a monitor misinformation. it is a good thing. it was a why is the law must having such a different opinion to you perhaps? so let me just the am make you the, the question is how do we fight and ms information now in the web. the question is, we don't have any means. there is an abundance on the information produced every day, but humans and by machines. so the question is, how can we classify these pieces of information as pieces of dizzy information or not? is too much knowledge too much information. that's why i think i might have in tackling

these this challenge and in the precision to identify museum formation. but a, i can be also also a threat, for example, machines can generates in theater, gain formation, that is bias. so human says human, we have the, we have the object, we have the goal of controlling the sources of the you formation we generate by do i do believe a i can pass. so it looks like it's not part of the problem, luca, because at the end of the day you have, you have to program a software to, to be aware of circles misinformation, but who is going to program it. mr. ross over to you doesn't give the programmer overriding kind of authority to decide what is and what is not misinformation right of cause. so like the wheat, one thing which i strongly believe is dr. you cannot replace the natural

intelligence of humans with artificial intelligence because after all, the set of data, which is being treated by humans and we humans are the biologically creator of that data. so you know, so it gets 1000000 bias and what was to get fed to protect that. he mentioned example off the january 6. what happened in washington? not e. i could control that, but i believe that a i is going to rule on such an agenda. this is going to give last to every national security threat to every nation will be strongly high rate. and this is something which, which shouldn't happen. and i strongly agree that a lot less. it is far more dangerous than news on the, in a recent interview with mr. ma him, he said that if we do not stop the speed, which is the rising, it's going to be too late very soon. well, i mean, i mean,

look, let me bring it over to you because, you know, for example, when, when trump was banned from twitter, or, for example, anyone in the world during the whole pandemic crisis of coven, anyone dissented the mainstream narratives they were blasted. anyone, if anyone descended against the vaccines, for example, they were essentially blocked on twitter and any number of social media platforms? i mean, do you think luca bringing in a i for this to, to, to tackle misinformation. i mean, do you think the a, i will truly be on bias? well, my question is, is the human truly bias? so of course, as a i can be biased as much as humans that and bias. i don't believe those examples you ever mention were done by machine. i think they were done by humans. my point is both humans and the i are bias and my is simply a, i can speed the recognition over. i'm biasing information away faster than human,

but the human should be at the source of the generation of information and we shall control everything. that is the output of a emissions miller. what about go on will go on please. yeah, but it, but the data, which is the beating, the beating in the after all been done with humans. so like the one day will come when the dominating countries might just declare and digital was on the countries who are not so found to be technology development. so i believe that it will dominate countries and because eventually is driven by humans like so i don't agree on the statement like it's, it's a great read. yeah. so look at what, why look at, take it one step further if you'll be so kind of the us state department says that a systems should not be used to control nuclear weapons. i mean, how is that something lucre that even needs to be clarified?

while we are all agreed that a, i will not take those decision, but imagine nasty tuition where we have a kind of safety critical systems where we have to take decision very fast. in a matter of seconds. we cannot ever meetings and take a rational decision over 2 or 3 days. so a, i can speed up, can support the decision making process. of course, again, humans must have the control of the i, we built bought a, i can speed up decision. the most important is to verify whether these decision, right, actually rational decisions. but what, what about the evolution of a i, luca? i mean this is something that ok, so humans may be original programming. but there's all this chatter today about a evolving and a i wanting to be creative to do things to be more more human like. does that concern you, luca in any way?

well, know, in the sense that it a i, if there is something i keep repeating over and over if there is something that a i cannot do. and one be couple of doing either reasoning, reasoning as human ai is simply train. we the example humans then try to mimic replication forecasting of, of things. but i thought you were going to be full. it's not always going to be that simple though, because a eyes that you know, part of their route existence is that being designed to evolve. i 1000000 the over you, i don't want to go on hollywood on anyone here, but sky net come into this kind of stuff. issues. any concerns? millen. yeah. hi sir. yeah. yeah. so one thing i would like to just mark here, what do you say that fast decision? so if a ha is giving a fast decision, then i take it as

a fast decision on destruction. a fast decision of this, it was invasion or the country faster. she isn't too completely shut. are they? they political system of missions. so you know, so this is a something which should be considered a very alarming. you know, priority i think is a good point. there, but look, we've got 20 seconds. your last comment, please say yes, you can apply the same reasoning for doing good things. maybe takes a while. mean us to help or humans in the streets, but no. yeah, definitely is not paid because not with ecology for the good things. and that's not just what we say by the technology mastermind alone must also say that is far more dangerous news, and one fine day will be i will be authorized to take up a new decision is going to take a very part of the 2nd of destruction and like a.